42CI58NM2 e. MM3 HAMBLETON """™010

2.140431

NORANDA EXPLORATION COMPANY, LIMITED (no personal liability)

REPORT ON GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS

DAYO SHOWING

HEMLO GOLD MINES LTD.

NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO DIVISION

RECEIVED

APR l l 1991

MINING LANDS SECTION

PROJECT NO. 2084/2092 JOHN GINGERICH HEMLO, ONTARIO SR. DIVISION GEOPHYSICIST APRIL 6, 1991

42C15SW8ee2 8.14043 HAMBLETON 010C

TABLE OF COIN iu\iz

1.0 INTRODUCTION l

2.0 LOCATION AND ACCESS l

3.0 CLAIM DISPOSITION l

4.0 GENERAL GEOLOGY l

5.0 AIRBORNE MAGNETICS 2

6.0 PERSONNEL 3

7.0 INSTRUMENTATION 37.1 Magnetometer Survey 37.2 VLF-EM Surveys 37.3 Induced Polarization/Resistivity Survey 4

8.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS 48.1 Magnetometer Survey 48.2 VLF 8i EM Survey 4

8.2.1 NLK 48.2.2 NSS 4

8.3 IP/Resistivity Survey 48.3.1 Resistivity Survey 48.3.2 IP Survey 6

9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7

List of Figures

Scale

Figure l Location Map 1:1,584,000Figure 2 Dayohessarah Property Map 1:253,440Figures Grid Location Map 1:253,440Figure 4 Total Field Magnetic Values 1:2500Figures Total Field Magnetic Contours 1:2500Figure 6 VLF-EM Values (NLK-Seattle) 1:2500Figure 7 VLF-EM Values (NAA-Annapolis) 1:2500Figures VLF-EM Profiles (NLK-Seattle) 1:2500Figure 9 VLF-EM Profiles (NAA-Annapolis) 1:2500Figure 10 Resistivity Contours 1:2500Figure 11 IP Contours 1:2500Figure 12 IP/Resistivity Pseudosection Line 9800N 1:2500Figure 13 IP/Resistivity Pseudosection Line lOOOON 1:2500Figure 14 IP/Resistivity Pseudosection Line 10200N 1:2500Figure 15 IP/Resistivity Pseudosection Line 10400N 1:2500Figure 16 IP/Resistivity Pseudosection Line 10600N 1:2500

.0 INTRODUCTION

The Dayo Showing area, consists of 2 claims and covering virtually the entire length of the gold bearing vein found by prospectors working for Noranda Exploration on behalf of Hemlo Gold Mines Ltd, Hemlo Gold Mines Ltd optioned 652 claims encompassing most of the greenstone belt from Broad Horizons Inc.

Between February l and March 3, 1991 a total of 3.8 km total field magnetics, 3.8 km VLF-EM and l .3 km of IP/resistivity was completed. The objective of the program was to map the mineralized structure which hosts the gold bearing Sugar Vein and assist mapping of other similarly mineralized features.

2.0 LOCATION AND ACCESS (Figure 1)

The property is located approximately 30 km northeast of the town of White River. The claims are accessible by trail north of a logging road from White River. Access is most easily achieved by helicopter.

3.0 CLAIM DISPOSITION (Figure 2)

The Dayo Showing property consists of 2 claims, staked by Norex personnel SS 115498 and 115499 and recorded Nov. 15, 1990.

4.0 GENERAL GEOLOGY

The Dayohessarah greenstone belt consists of a small arcuate north-northwest trending volcanic-sedimentary package 32 kilometers long by 6 kilometers wide situated between the larger Hemlo and Kabinakagami Greenstone Belts. The stratigraphy appears to be fairly simple with a central band of metasedimentary rocks centered on Dayo Lake. The unit is flanked and underlain by mafic volcanic flows and tuffs. The metasedimentary- metavolcanic sequence is enclosed and intruded by plutons of tonalite to granodiorite and equivalent metamorphosed orthogneiss. Minor mafic to ultramafic stocks and dykes outcrop around the northern end of Dayo Lake.

Structurally the greenstone belt is a clearly defined symmetrical syncline which appears to plunge to the south and whose axis trends approximately 335*. The resultant regional foliation and subparallel bedding trend at 310* to 330* and dip steeply to the

•91 03/13 10:51 O l 807 238 1175 Norex Hem l o 05

L AKI SVHKIQ*

'91 03/13 10:19 l 807 238 J 175 ttorex Hcmlo (2) 04

P-O OHf CX*HtM AMOMU

MYAHittAIUN MIOWITY

west, east of Dayo Lake and steeply to the east west of Dayo Lake.

Mineralization has not been well documented and previous exploration, although limited, has not had any significant results. Best values include Q.33% Ni and ,080xi) Cu over 5 ft with no economic gold values recorded.

5.0 AIRBORNE MAGNETICS

The Dayohessarah greenstone belt was flow by Terraquest Limited in 1988 with a Cessna horizontal gradiometer and VLF-EM system. Compilation of the data was completed in 1990 when Hemlo Gold purchased the unpaid survey from Terraquest. The north-south trending belt was flow with east-west lines at 100m line spacing. The relatively tight line spacing provided good magnetic coverage. However the VLF-EM data is only marginally useful as NAA, the selected transmitter station, is less than ideally oriented to provide mapping of north-south features.

The aeromagnetic data defines two dominant magnetic trends, one approximately north-south (350*-370") and the other northwest-southeast (315* -330*). There is also minor evidence of east-west and northwest magnetic trends.

The greenstone belt is characterized by an a arcuate trending magnetic low bound to the east and west by slightly more magnetic granitic batholiths. The core of the belt is mapped by a strong magnetic high most pronounced in the central portion of the belt, decreasing in amplitude and thickness both to the north and south. The entire belt is cut by a series of predominantly northwest trending magnetic linears mapping diabase dykes. Several northeast trending dykes are also evident.

The extensive area of low magnetic relief which defines the limits of the belt is interpreted to reflect predominantly sedimentary lithologies or felsic to intermediate volcanics. It should be noted that magnetically there appears to be limited difference in what is mapped as mafic volcanics and sediments. Thus using magnetics as a lithologic mapping tool should be used with caution. It is also equally true that geologic mapping may also be suspect.

The area of strongest magnetic relief occurs ostensibly north of Dayohessarah Lake in an area of mafic intrusives (gabbro). Within this area previously defined conductors were tested for Cu-Ni mineralization.

The magnetic expression of the mafic intrusives indicate thicker more massive units to the north drapping the northern apex of a coarse (conglomerates) sedimentary core. The southern extension of the elevated magnetics displays a more uniform, less intense expression and may map a poorly exposed (largely within the lake) volcanic core or iron

rich metasediments.

The diabase dykes which crosscut the belt disrupt magnetic trends making resolution of stratigraphy locally difficult. Not withstanding these considerations, there are several structural-lithologic features identified which warrant ground follow up.

6.0 PERSONNEL

The ground geophysical surveys were undertaken by T. Walmsley, C. Schultze, J. Maclsaac, P. Maclsaac, M. Stares, S. Stares, K. Keates and C. Sedleski. All are employees of Noranda Exploration Company, Limited.

7.0 INSTRUMENTATION

7. l Magnetometer Survey

The survey was undertaken with the Scintrex MP-3 proton precession magnetometer. Measurements of the earth's total geomagnetic field (accuracy of .1 gammas) were taken at 12.5m stations and locally 5m. Diurnal corrections were made by integrating the magnetic variations recorded every 30 seconds by an MP-3 base station with raw field data.

7.2 VLF-EM Surveys

The VLF-EM system used was the Geonics EM-16. The survey parameters used were as follows:

Transmitter Frequency Reading Interval Measurements Total

Transmitter Frequency Reading Interval Measurements Total

Annapolis, Maryland24.0 KHz25 metersIn-Phase and Quadrature components in percent3.8 km

Cutler, Maine24.0 KHz25 metersIn-Phase and Quadrature components in percent3.8 km

7.3 Induced Polarization/Resistivity Survey

The IP/Resistivity survey was carried out by Noranda Exploration personnel using the IPT-IB transmitter with 2.5 kw generator made by Phoenix Limited and the Scintrex IPR8 receiver. A dipole-dipole array used with an 'A' spacing of 25m and spreads n = l to 4. The current "on/off time was 2 seconds. The primary voltage measured during the "on" current cycles is a function of the electrical resistivity of the ground. The calculated resistivity R is: R ^ K * V/I, where V is the 'on' time voltage, I is the 'on' time current and K is a geometric constant determined by the relative positions of the current and potential electrodes.

The secondary voltage, measured in time intervals during "off current cycles, is a function of the polarizability of the ground. In all cases, the chargeability measured by the IPR-8 is the mean value of the transient voltage over a selected time interval which is:

1) normalized for the length of the integration interval2) normalized for the primary steady state voltage3) normalized for the decay curve shape4) normalized for number of pulses

The units of the quantities measured are therefore dimensionless and are normally expressed in "millivolts per volt."

8.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

8.1 Magnetometer Survey

Prospecting open ground in the Hemlo Gold-Broad Horizons Joint Venture area resulted in the discovery of a gold bearing quartz vein within a sulphidized, northwest (320') trending shear. Subsequent to the discovery, the showing was staked and a grid was established and surveyed.

The total field magnetic survey defined an area of moderate magnetic relief varying from 58500 to 62400 nT and averaging approximately 58975 nT. Magnetic trends are ostensibly grid north-south (340 *)- Central to the survey area a broad zone (200m) of northwest (315*), crosscutting magnetics is defined.

The larger amplitude magnetic features in excess of 59500 gammas appear to map mafic intrusives and iron formation within the mafic volcanics. The strike of these features are usually less than 400m indicating a complex structural area.

The background area displays an erratic magnetic response. The amplitudes are generally small and strike is poorly defined. The relatively low amplitude of the magnetic response indicates iron poor mafic volcanics with local, minor segregations of iron formation.

Weak linear magnetic features defined within the crosscutting structures appear to map local sulphidation and magnetite alteration associated with the deformation zone or narrow dykes within the structure. Mapping of these features appears to be important in identifying mineralized structures.

8.2 VLF-EM

The VLF-EM survey was undertaken using 2 different transmitter stations. The lines were first surveyed using station NLK. When the conductive trends were determined to be NW-SE, the lines were resurveyed using NSS which is better suited for this conductive trend.

8.2.1 NLK

The first survey using NLK, Seattle defined a weak conductive zone paralleling the Dayo Showing Deformation Zone. Conductor V4 is interpreted to map a mineralized structure.

8.2.2 NSS

The second survey was undertaken using NSS, Annapolis which has s more north- south orientation. The conductive limits of V4 are better defined but V4 is still a weak conductor.

8.3 Induced Polarization/Resistivity Survey

A total of 1.3 km of dipole-dipole IP/Resistivity was run over the two claims encompassing the defined strike of the Sugar Vein. The generally high resistive host rocks and then overburden locally results in contact problems which results in noisy readings. Direct contact across small lenses of iron function result in unstable current-shorts and IP reading are often not obtained.

8.3.1 Resistivity Survey

The resistivity survey defines an area of relatively high background resistivity in excess of 10,000 ohm-m with trends conformable with magnetic features. The area of lower resistivities ranging from 3000 to 6000 ohm-m appear to map sheared and/or mineralized lithology. Within these areas discrete electrically conductive zones are evident with resistivities less than 1000 ohm-m.

The high background resistivities are indicative of high metamorphic terrain. Bedrock penetration will undoubtably be limited in areas of conductive or thick cover as current will predominate within the less resistive overburden. Thus determination of bedrock responses in areas where low apparent resistivities persist to the second spread (^2) will be suspect.

The contoured resistivity data indicates crosscutting, 315-320*, trends parallel with magnetic and the Dayo Showing Deformation Zone strike. However, there is no consistent resistivity signature associated with the known limits of the Sugar Vein shear. The resistivity signature does indicate a discontinuity in trends with the vein coincident with either a resistivity contact or weak discrete low. This signature is generally weak and is not considered a well defined, mappable feature.

Within the survey area several discrete low resistivity zones are defined. These features are invariably associated with magnetic, weak VLF anomalies indicting a probable sulphide (py) source. In some instances mapping and previous work indicate most of these conductive zones define small lenses of iron formation. Anomalies which parallel the deformation zone should be further investigated as to the possibility of alteration (sulphides/magnetite) associated with the mafic (ultramafic?) intrusives.

8.3.2 IP Survey

The IP survey defined an area of moderate polarizability with background values 6- 10 mV/V and anomalous responses up to 60 mV/V. IP trends parallel magnetic and resistive trends.

The high background resistivities result in the slightly elevated background IP. There is a noticeable sympathetic IP response with variation in resistivity. Weak Ip responses associated with high resistivity are thus not likely reflecting increases in mineralization. Accordingly poor IP response may reflect contact effects or crystalline variations in lithology.

Within the survey area a minimum of IP zones are resolved most of which are marginal ^ 2 x background) responses with the stronger responses generally corresponding with conductive (VLF/low resistivity) iron formation. Zones which crosscut stratigraphy may define mineralized structure.

9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The geophysical program appears to have effectively mapped lithologic and structural features. The primary targets being crosscutting conductive zones.

Prospecting and trenching along the conductive trends is highly recommended.

Respectfully submitted,

NORANDA EXPLORATION COMPANY, LIMITED (no personal liability)

JohtftjtngerichThunder Bay, Ontario Sr. Division Geophysicist April 5, 1991 Northwestern Ontario Division

OntarioDOCUMENT No W9150.

Report of WorkMining Act (Geophysical, Geological and Geochemical Surveys)

42cissweaea

ection;' Mineral Development and Laibkfeffench:Tvpe of Surveyjs)Geophysics

Recorded Holder(s)Noranda Exploration Company, Limited

Pri .icenee No.

dress"O Box 2656, Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 5G2

Company, Limited, P.O. Box 2656, Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 5G2

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technica! Report)John Gingerich, c/o P.O. Box 2656, Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 5G2

DV!Day l Mo Yr. Day | Mo.

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Special Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

P/Res- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Other

Days per Claim^-40 —

-20 —

"20 —

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

Total miles flown over claim(s).Dale . ir.* Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)Apr.A/yi - s?i .rf Sv — ~ S^Z***^**'-

Certification Verifying "Report of Work

Mining ClaimPrefix

SSM^SSM-

Number1135-43S ——

T1t3B4S9

Mining ClaimPrefix Number

— REG——— ftPftt^ P. E C-JC

MINING Uf

Mining ClaimPrefix

itVEfi-MR D

ins sAPR ^o 199

- -fteCSlpHter

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

Number

D—

JUD- -CTior\

2

1 hereby certify that 1 have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in this Report of Work, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and annexed report is true.Name and Address of Person Certifying ~-.- n —. , ~ ~. . r,-, r, i-^oCecilia M. Barrett, P.O. Box 2656, Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 5G2

For Office Use Only^-— ~"~~~" ~~~~~"-

Tolal Days^' "Date Recorded Mm CrReeCrded ^. 1,' Up. toto/^//l/) Date Approvedas.B*ecr3ed'-— ^*r"'

-— 'SEEREVISEO^df

Telephone No.(807) 623-4339

ng\ Recorder ^— — ~^

5TfleTal Manager, Mining Lands

^STATEMENT

DateApr. 4/91 c ^y^~:

Received Stamp *"WULT 8TB. WARIE MINING DIVISION

RECEIVED

10AVR19Stu7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3

4

)1 PM i4,5,6

1362 (89/06)

iJ"TX MWUry ol TtchnlciJ Alt* i TT 1 North*fn 0*v*toPm*n* Work Cradltt

Ontario

4meht ' — """^^^^"^^^^^^ ' 1 2.14043

[bei* . I*M*li5!word*r^ R*pon **^!ay 15. 1991 W. 9^50.00046

n*MOCO9G HOtOH*

Noranda Exploratipn Co... i, td.T*wn*rti0 or Area

Hambleton Township., Type of eurvey and number of

Aeeetemerrt day* credit per delm0*ophy*lc*l

tleetromegnatte —————— 10 j Q ————— day*

Magnetometer ——————— 20.0 ————— day*

•tedtometrte ————————————————— - day*

10 0

ft.K~ *y.

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claim* Awwed" column

Geological ^y*

0*xx?K*mlc*1 ———————— *w

Man day* Q Airborne Q

Special provWon K) Ground O

B Credit* hav* been reduced becauM of partial coverage of claim*.

O Credit* have been reduced became of correction* to work date* and figure* of applicant

,, (M-i-.. * ----i•wwnf L ei m MN^^M

SSM. 1135498-499

Spedri watHto under Motion 77 (18) for tha following mining dalmt

-

No eradlto hav* baan aflowad for tha following mining dalmtQ not sufficiently covered by th* lurvey Q Insufficient technical data filed

Tha Mining Recorder may reduce th* above credit* H necettary In order that th* total number of approved eueMment day* recorded on each claim doe* not crated th* minimum allowed e* followt: Oeoohvtleal - K): Qeoloooot - 40: Qeoehemlcal - 40: lAftkon 771101 . ML

S l

eto* O

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Geophyslcal-Geologlcal-Geochemical Technical Data Statement

Ontario

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s)j i l \ i

Township or Area

Claim Holder (s) 60. /"/a/.

Survey Compan

Author of Report J-

Address of Author rt/tf"

Covering Dates of Surveys.

Total Miles of Line Cut

(liifecutting to office)

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysicalml * *j| * l tfr .~*f /vf*^^

//v/^5 V Electromagneticv^.

Magneto Jg-*"

Geological

Geochemical

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne lurveyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

f/ 7

Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

...o.(prefix) (number)

TOTAL CLAIMS.

837 (85/12)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations^2 TP/tt.IlK/ZnVtftP/JliSf/lLoHAl N.imher of Readings/J^J^Atf/gtf Jso'/l/l.tJSfUll/tf/yLofiV f-- -~ f r x ^ is// f ' y fC*m.1fiuL~tviJ@lfJ/JS.S'n* ML?-/S~~fttSirH. /^A< Line snaring foOnn /0na*M /&1)** \dLf- ^r-.j^-i""——— ^T/ f V V ; B y. ^.f.-^ r-^Station interval

Profile scale JL&

Contour interval ^Oi f^t*

M&

/forJ ilSOOj W,Mn tfe4 /O/Jf) *CT y*\d

InstrumentMAGNETIC -f- X -7*""

Arvnrary — Srale ronstant -J * f f\ l

Dilimal correction method /5^jfe J:rfrr7}n\ fPj'jbfCreS'

Base Station rhTk-in interval (ho^rs) "&O -ip^jtf^ rf ^\xt/^

Base Station location and vain*" t-(tCn,vtd f^r ffrf^f* &-J ^**/

i Je+S p* f-J&uvriS

ROMAGNETIC

ELE

Instrument A/LfC

)il configuration

Coil separation —

Accuracy —————

Method:

&M AJ& //.

, o/ t©^"ixed transmitter

/L/LK J- 8

measured.

D Shoot back2- A/t t

D In line CD Parallel line

( Sp(fcifyV.L.F.ftation)

GRAV

Instrument

constant.

Corrections made.

station value and location.

accuracy.

Instrument

INDUCED POLARIZATION

RESISTIVITY

Method LfeParameters -

Power

Electrode ar Electrode sp Tvoe of elec

a i mie Uoma - On time

- Off time- Delay time

- Integration

ray /i

acing ————troHe

m

2- *16

time

^^

r'fltfflrp*Vsj j —

es^o ^H

.•fpTZ^K

Z&c-

ff

1? /*i i iiiJfr^ftt^af^

o^tP *vi S /fi Jt^itojZfs

rr.&s 3:?ri AO;*nfe- /Jtjitib.

7 J f./fe*-f XfoL.1.

LJ frequency uomam FrequencyRange

SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument-——-————————^-———^———————————————.^——.^-—- Range.Survey Method —————————————————————————————————————————————

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument.Values measured.Energy windows (levels)—^^—-————..-..——--..———^—.—^——-.^—.—.^^————

Height of instrument^———-^^———^—..——^—————————Background Count.Size of detector————————-—--——^-——.^^—-———..———.———————.^——Overburden ——-——-—--—-——..^-^-———-—————.^——.———.————.—^-..———.

(type, depth - include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)

Type of survey^—-—————.——————.^—^———.Instrument —^-—-——.—--——.—.-—.-——————.Accuracy__________________________Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s) ————

Instrument(s) ——————(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy————————————.—.—(specify for each type of turvey)

Aircraft used ——————————————————^——————-^

Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude________________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth-———— Terrain—————————

Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent O

p. p. m. Dp. p. b. D

Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Others —________________________Field Analysis

Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used ——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. —————————

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis____

Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used——

Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory— Extraction Method-—— Analytical Method - Reagents Used ————

.tests)

-tests)

-tests)

General. General.

Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ministere duD6veloppement du Nord et des Mines

Mining Lands Section159 Cedar Street, 4th FloorSudbury, OntarioP3E 6A5

Telephone: Fax:

Your File: Our File:

(705) 670-7264 (705) 670-7262

W. 9150. 00046 2. 14043

l, 1991

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Developmentand Mines875 Queen Street, EastP. O. Box 669Sault Ste. Marie, OntarioP6A 2B3

Dear Sir/Madam:

RE: Notice of Intent dated May 14, 1991 for Resistivity,Induced Polarization, Electromagnetic and Magnetometer Surveys on mining claims SSM. 1135498 et al in the Township of Hambleton.

The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent have been approved as of the above date.

Please inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely,

Ron. C.Provincial Manager, Mining LandsMines 8t Minerals Division

CDS/:3S/J1 Enclosures:

cc: Noranda Exploration Co. Ltd. Thunder Bay, Ontario

Resident Geologist Wawa, Ontario

.Assessment Files Office Toronto, Ontario

Noranda Exploration Company, Limited(no personal liability)

P.O. Box 2656, 960 Alloy Drive Telephone (807) 623-4339 Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 5G2 Fax (807) 623-0452

norandaApril 8, 1991

Mining Lands Section 159 Cedar Street Sudbury, OntarioP3E6A5 2.14043^Gentlemen:

Re: Mining Claims SSM 1135498 and 1135499 - Hambleton Township

Enclosed please find Technical Data Statement, Reports and Maps (in duplicate) for the above noted survey. We are also attaching a copy of the Report of Work which was sent to the Mining Recorder April 4, 1991.

Yours truly,

NORANDA EXPLORATION COMPANY, LIMITED (no personal liability)

Cecilia M. Barrett Lands Administrator Northwestern Ontario Division

:cmb

Enclosures - 4

c.c. File - 2084

RECEIVED

APR 111991

MINING LANDS SEC! iON

i

o

o en0•PL

oen0o

o enen o-y

0 O5o o~a*

Instrument

Ootum

Contou^ Inte^/ol

Conducto'- Axis

50m 25tn (hn t l l l l

: MP3

: TOTA:.: 58000.0 nT

50m

DAYO LAKEMAGNETOMETER SURVEY

PROJECT: DAYOHESSARAH LAKE PROJECT # : 2092 BASEUNE AZIMUTH : 340 Deg.

SCALE ~ 1 : 2500 DATE : 2/28/91

SURVEY BY : TW/JM NTS : 42 C/14

FILE: M2092DLNORANDA EXPLORATION

2. 14043,

too oZ

COex* o oz

co Oo O•z.

Ooo0"Z.

Oo01oP:

oooz:

enO

o ro O o z:

oro en O

oCoo o z:

oCJ

DAYO LAKEMAGNETOMETER SURVEY

PROJECT: DAYOHESSARAH U\KE PROJECT # : 2092 BASELINE AZIMUTH : 340 Deg.

SCALE rr 1 : 2500 DATE : 2/28/91 SURVEY BY : TW/JM NTS : 42 C/14

,xA FILE: M2092DLNORANDA EXPLORATION

Fie'd : TOTAL: 58000.0 nT

Contour 'ntervo! : 50 nT

Conductor Axis

100m

2. 14043

too oz

toODo ol

(O

o o

CD o o o0z

o oen o

oo o

oen o

^^B

O ro 0oz

^M*

oen -0z

0 COo0z

.1 0350N

/o

Datum 0.0

fxi*

JO*

RESISTIVITY SURVEY

PROJECT: DAYO PROJECT # : 2084 BASEUNE AZIMirm : 340 Deg.

SCALE - 1 : 2500 DATE : 3/ 1/91SURVEY BY : JM/TW NTS : 42/C/14

RLE: M2084IPNORANDA EXPLORATION

2. 14043.

rC. O -'./.

2.5C -'

A,x : 3

IP/RESISTIVITY SURVEY

PROJECT: DAYO PROJECT f : 2092 !BASEUNE AZIMUTH : 340 Deg. j

.——————————————————————————————————jSCALE = 1 : 2500 DATE : 3/1/91 |SURVEY BY : JM/TW NTS : 42/C/14 j

RLE: M2084IP l__NORANDA EXPLORATION_____ _j

2. 14043

MF4.

r.

IP RES1C, IO1.-

s, .0*.

o i

0=1

n-4

n s iT

m 4

5*50 M 5*00 u 4*60 U 4-00 U 3-90 Uim

U t 4-QC W t

l.t .S .7 t."5

fLine 9800 N

*

* t

* * *

* * * *

s-.r .r e* t: I- 1 I. IPS-3 ^ jc-nc...: . i:-., Hr

INTEPFRFTfiT ION

5tro^.o ijVffijo ."' po^jr.'zjt

ir. r ^5 is i , /; t^.

B.': K no

2 . 14043^DAYOHESSARfiH LAKE

INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEYDAYOHESSARAH LAKE

Project Location

!t7

:-.:e- f-f-tii ':" t ,:

•Sial-: l : r -jOP

NOREXt*C ID

MF4

/ fi J

IP RES m, te

1000.

CJ OJ

.V-\

..^,^'~~—--PES IP

j L;P:O

.——-l

IQL.

5-5C J

f: 21* 3'.' f;!**-

f M t.

n.l

n-2

n-3

n-4

J-f-C^ ^^ ^^L."

i .5 .7 ..:. :~:'*:A- ^ . -;:2J^

.8 .5 .5

n. l

-*-^ - .S V- .!^^ J \'^/ , S"" ^: ^ : ".~"*-.4 O--•X '"Tr"""- i

MF4

tn LU

J.100 Le LO

Im/l

i ID. --s *

Line 10000 N

x f

E .o; t 3:-1

a - ..3 T

. i, 2. 3.

~ f. f : '

PC l y :.-*t lo- We t si r *c t o'

4 t

* * *

* * r

Logar i l HIT ; c Conic jr s 1. 1.5. 2. ?. 5. 7.

I Dr-3

it co r /ir l*, j

i"n r irS i5t i v i !||.

H*!l defined I^crsase In p wllhcut rd'Vtd res.s'lvlty

t,

Ion

DAYOHESSARAH LAKE

INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY

DAYOHESSARAH LAKE Project Local Ion

f t j! .'on b'.,-: l : 50CO P,'

NOREX

4043

MF4-

IP RES 10.. to-..

S-l 13X

CJ OJ

S N

\ X

5-00 M V 4*50 *,oc u 3-50 U MD U 2*50 w 2-00 U 1*50 U 1*00 u 0*50 Uf: l ru ra u* i* s*

5*00 u 0*50 U

n-2 n-3 n-4

'^= l

s*go K ^ 4*fo w **OC H 3-50 U1.1 t.8 1.3 1.4 2.8 i;

3-00 1*50 u 1*00 w 0*W bI.? I.- 1.6 l .9 .J -8 .9 f:l

\-4.^-^FM

" 3 ryp ^'ffiSS^bljrirS ^ (^ i z 3- 4

Hv*r* t f

MF.4

• ri LU-J

Cir ;

O

LJ LC

f!ll*~ RESISTIVITY

2-14043INTERPPETATION

FACTCP

* l OX:

Line 10200 N

J "O D I-?- l J IfC l*- 'V ' -3'^

clot pc .f t

' -' . t e r t? d Fro:

Res.'s: : v; t,. — — — ——Polarl/atJon —————————-Metal Factor ————— ——

l th-ri ; c

filter*

* ** * *

* * * *

Operator: JM/TW.

INTERPRETATION

Strong increase In polarization *cco*p*ri i^d by marked decrease In resist i V i ty.

Hell defined In^rea'-e In pol *r ; z*; ;o w:i k o^t marked resistivity decease.

Poor lu defined oc! 3' Ii*t Ion iwit"" "O resistivity signature.

Lev

DAYOHESSARAH LAKE

INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEYDAYOHESSARAH LAKE

Project Locat ion

Date: 91 D; t 26 Inte--Dr ot a: i or. by:

Scale: l : 5000

N.T.S.:

"H

NOREX

MF4

2.

IP RES—- 1C. tO.

5-1 100C- ..l OCX

CJ oJ 10L.

0*1

o-2

n-3

n-4

nz 4

if t* f;ttw

4*50 W 4*00 H, ^ 3*50 u 3-O) U_____2*50 u* -.* .f .^\\^\j -* "—** '* ^~i 4.7 8.8 12 It TS 12 i* M 1] l'

2-nou 1*00

8.* 8.J

0=3

-3

*-50 W 2-50 H.e .s t. ' I.S 1.1 .7 .6 .9 .S .6 .5 .5 .4 .4 .4 .7

o - fi

Ci

RESISTIVITY

(mV)

2.-14

FACTGP* :ooc-

L Ine lO&OO N

l e-C JDO le 'V

r-3- -;v- ?--

t- j c t p c- - n i

er e

i ; . : t y i J:A t Ion

1*1 F' ac t or

Log Jr i ttim i c

filter*

* ** * *

* * * *

l. 1.5. 2. 2. 5. 7.5. ;0....

D

043,

Instrument: IPt], IPR-6 Freauencyt .125 HI

Deer a t o--: JM/TM.

INTERPRETATION

Strong increase I" pols'r Izj! ion

in res I? t i vi ty.

Ueli defined increase- In po! i' i :t'. loo • Ilr-.O'j! marked resistivity ^ecr^as*.

Poorly defined poly Izs.t Ion i^c'eas? with no resistivity sicmature.

Lov resistivity fea'ore-.

DAYOHESSARAH

INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEYDAYOHESSARAH LAKE

Project Location

Date: 31 /0:X28 Integer e t at r on by:

Scale: l : 5000

N.T.!5.: 31 J/16

NOREX

MF4.

IP RES ic. to-..

5-1

CJ OJ

lOOOj

PES:o.

IP -lo

Ls

—. __ . ___i-.QL Le

3-5DU 3-OOU * 2*S 2-Xi j*ao u i-oo wf:: t* i* st SK at. m i* ' MR l* i* i* f;l

4-00 ^*50 U 3XJO U 2-SD u 2-OD U 1*50 1-00 w

o-3

n-4

to 9.9 t.} J.-" is 10 ts

M

V.

.S

3-00 2-50 U 2-X U 1-00 yI.I

-3

' 4

NF a

LLi

cs CL

RESISTIVITY

Z. 1404J3

l COO J

L Ine 10600 N

D loo 1, e -D l pc-l e i^r

* 25 -n

l. 2. 3.

' : . t e^pfi Prc f : ies

•?e5 : s ; ; v . *. j Polar :^*i :or, Metal Factor

f :l i-r*

* 4

* * *

* * t

1. 1.5. 2. 3. 5. 7.5. 1C....

: IPTl. IPR-8 : .125 Hz

Op*-- j tor: JM/TW.

INTERPRETATION

Strong Increase In accorpan.^d by ijrt in res i st iv i (y.

Uel i defined I^c'^ase In polj'.iition vithout nar*ed resistivity de

Poo'ly defined polarization I with no resistivity signature.

Low resistivity feature.

DAYOHESSARAH LAKE

INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY

DAYOHESSARAH LAKEProject Location

Oat-: ''-1/C2/28I n t er pr e. t a t l O r* by I

S-.ale: l : 50CG

N.'.S.: 3!

i (oNOREX

DAYOVLF-EM SURVEY

PROJECT : DAYO PROJECT # : 2084 BASEUNE AZIMUTH : 340 Deg.

SCALE * 1: 2500 . DATE : 2/15/91 SURVEY BY : TW " NTS : 42/C/14 RLE: V2084DAY FREQ.: 24.8 KHz.

NOBANDA EXPLORATION

2. 14043,.

6 - 1 1 ~

\

A. ""* ^* T \——————79 \ e^* '————-V*X \:^-^ ^\ \^ r-v-v . iV'.1\ V* \ AOJ/ ^ Y\ 3-w ,-x \ -i* ,^' -;a ~*

3 ^ \ 4

-^0 ^ *\

'V^ *0" * V, 6 3

'*, \/ l*

\,V V ^5

-* \ -V*"** \ -4'-^ \ '6^ ' 1,.'-o ^ V-t'^:"^"V \ \3 -^ \ -V-'/ s'A 79 \ VV""'^ '^^ ^ V3 \ V- s^^W-\^\\V- V*.,t \ -^ t'*^v^i 3 ^- '- ^-\M')c'V* u'?,,-0^

t^^,---**

e-3 ^-^ \ 'S^ \ s'fVV

^mi^, v:,•*'\ Y* \ "-1 ^-^\ V\\ s'^* \ -* ^A -O^-i-v\ **\\ v^

o o en o

o ro o o

oro m O

oCJo o

oCOUJo

instrgm*nt : EM—16Vertical Sea!* tnphoM/Quod : 1 cm - 10. OX Fraser Filter Scale (InPhase) : ' cm - 10.0! Tx Location : NSS Annapolis, Md. Contour Interval :

Fraser Filter (on fn— Phase)

100m

VLF-EM SURVEY

PROJECT : DAYO PROJECT f : 2084 BASELINE AZIMUTH : 340 Deg.

SCALE ~ 1: 2500 DATE : 2/28/91 SURVEY BY : 1W NTS : 42/C/14 RLE: V2084DYO FREQ.: 21.4 KHz.

v NORANDA EXPLORATION______

2. 14043

50& 2Sni On Lit i i

VLF-EM SURVEY

PROJECT : DAYO PROJECT f : 2084 BASEUNE AZIMUTH : 340 Deg.

SCALE s 1: 2500 DATE : 2/15/91 SURVEY BY : TW - ^4TS : 42/C/14 RLE: V2084DAY FREQ.: 24.8 KHz.

NORANDA EXPLORATION

2. 14043

Instrument : EM-16Verticol Scot* tnphoee/Quod : 1 cm - 20. OXFraser Filter Scoto (InPhase) : 1 cm — 10.0*TJC Location : NSS Annapolis, Md.

Contour Interval :In-phose :. ——————Quadrature : ...............Fra**r Filter : .-....--

(on In—Phase)

fn Urn 100m

VLF-EM SURVEY

PROJECT : DAYO PROJECT # : 2084 BASEUNE AZIMUTH : 340 Deg.

SCALE - 1: 2500 DATE : 2/28/91SURVEY BY : TW NTS : 42/C/14RLE: V2084DYO FREQ.: 21.4 KHz.

NORANDA EXPLORATION

2 . 14043

Matthews Twp. (M. 1308) Bayfield Twp. (Mrl773)

4- BM.

71ft.

KJ692SB I069ZBS IO6929G IO69

-6,26* IOC92TO

1069264 -ST

1069258 1069259

SSM T*551* l SSM

1069257* 1069256! 1069255 IO69

~ SSM " SSM * 55^

1069246 ID692AB IO6925O 1O6925I

10692*7 IO69246 1069245 1O69244 io69243|

SSM 'In ———— A SSM

69256 ' IO6924O ID69?*! IO69242 S*-\

SSM SSW

IO69235 1069254 IO69ZU,K)6 9 212

l '

1069226 1069227

S069Z25

t9212 1069213 IO69214 IO69215

l SSM f~SSM

^J0555SU _ __ j — ~* SSM *^SM

l055560 [IOS5S59l6 f i 055 fSM TSSM "r55"" l SSM i~

1055564 i IO55565* lOSSSed 1O5556T 1055666 1 ———— -J ™" hambleton

l I055ST3 j I05557Z io5557l (, 055570 l

l SSM

I0555TB ' 1055579 1

D69306 i t0693O9 i D693IO

1055511 105^10 ' 105^09 SSM

1069^ l 0693M ' IO693O * O69SI2 ' D6931

1055516 1C555I7 ' '055518^)5^9 .05552CJ

- " ri683I7 .I069S* D693I9 0693200693

... . ___ .^^i^^V l110254* f "72351

l 1063325 'C63324l D693Z3J O69322SSM , ^

11/o* T'a girrzssSurrESM l

— .JD693301 D693U ' O63332 .

_j__L ——SSM . SSM i SSW

O69OO 1-069(20 1173078 ft o

f 069337 1106^336 | IO69335) O69334 | O69333

| , " Goyegenha

IDG9M4l D69S39 KJ69340 D6934I | D693A2

IXJQ"*^SB~ .SSU l .ei/ AS2W

— -j 1069340 ' D69347

l SSM "TsSM , SSM-I0693SO, D6935I

106988 ' 1069(97 ("O69S6-l-————J. l——————J

ID (T/ CO

Oo

THE TOWNSHtP OF

HAMBLETONDISTRICT OF

ALGOMA

SAULT STE. MARIE MINING DIVISION

SCALE: 1-INCH ^ CHAINS

LEGEND

PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALE

LEASESLOCATED. LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATION

MINING RIGHTS ONLY

SURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSWPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYS

RAILWAYS POWER LINES

MARSH ORMINES CANCELLED

NOTES400* Surface R.^ts Keservoiic." nrr—-* oil Lnkss c^C Rivert.

AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM STAKING UNDE.B SECTION 36 OF THE MINING ACT (R.S.O.) I9BO

ORDER NO.

W60/6C

DATE

21/05^86

DtSPOSITION.

U and SM and S RIGHTS REOPENED FOR STAKING SEE ORDER #0-18/88 DATED MARCH 1O/8B

, .

#O-SSM 12/89 REOPENED NOV. 19/89

M and S

W-SSM OS 789 WITHDRAWN NOV. 26/89

W-SSM O9/89 WITHDRAWN NOV.^6/89

M end 5

M and S

NOTICE OF FORESTRY ACTIVITYTHIS TOWNSHIP l AREA FALLS WITHIN TIC ^^ SS Karle Mining Division (Wawa District)

AND MAY "BE"SUB JECT"To "FORESTRY OPERATJONS.THE MNR UNIT FORESTER FOR THIS AREA CAN BE CONTACTED AT- P.O. Box 1160Highway 101Wawa, Ontario POS 1KO(705) C56-2396RE: Forest Karvageoent Activities

9 M. 8 M. ZH. '" 2.1404-3Odlum Twp.

DATE OF ISSUE -i . r *!": ' *"

MAR 8

SAULT STE. MARIE .MINING RECORDER'S OFRJ5

B^333KTTW^" so

nraposED wmnuHML M a s ttie K*.*,

PLAN NO.- .17"U^

DEPARTMENT OF MIMES

- ONTARIO -