42C12NW015S 2.082 MOLSON LAKE 010..CE1VEDAUG - ^ 1SC2

MINING LANDS SECTION

REPORT ON EM17L AND MAGNETOMETERSURVEYS

GOLIATH GOLD MINES LTD.HEMLO AREA

THUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION

By: Bruce Durham July 13, 1982

J

REPORT ON EM17L AND

MAGNETOMETER SURVEYS

GOLIATH GOLD MINES LTD.

HEMLO PROPERTY

THUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION

Julv 13, 1982 Bruce Durham Timmins, Ontario Project Geologist

D.R.Bell Geological Services Inc.

-1-

INTRODUCTION

A magnetometer survey of the Goliath Gold Mines property

neer Hemlo was done during 1981 by Prospecting Geophysics Ltd.

using north-south grid lines at 400 foot intervals. As a result

of this work it was decided that a more detailed magnetic survey

and some HLEM profiling were required on the four claims covered

by this report.

The additional line-cutting, rechaining, and geophysical

surveys were carried out by Mid-Canada Exploration Services Ltd.

of suite 8-251 Third Avenue Timmins, Ontario, during Feburary 1982,

Bell Geological Services of Box 1250, Timmins, Ontario, was

coiTimissioned by Goliath Gold Mines to write this report.

PROPERTY LOCATION AND ACCESS

The Goliath Gold Mines property consists of 58

contiguous unpatented mineral claims located in the Molson Lake

Area in the Thunder Bay and Sault Ste, Marie Mining Divisions.

The work covered by this report was done on a group of four

claims immediately east of the Corona Resources gold property.

The claims covered by this report are: TB576869, TB576870,

TB576878, TB5768?7.

The recorded holder of the claims is R.A. Schiralli, Suite 420

181 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario.

Access to this portion of the Goliath Gold Mines Ltd. property is via a railway access road which leaves Highway 17 at a point approximately two miles west of the junction of Highway 614.

GEOLOGY

The geology of the property is described in a report by Thomas Skimming, P. Eng. dated August 20, 1981. The geology of the area covered in this report is illustrated on Map 2439

-2-

ublished by the Ministry of Natural Resources of Ontario. The area covered by these detailed geophysical surveys is currently

being mapped using the existing north-south grid lines for control. Since a full report covering the geological survey will be submitted in the near future no further mention of the geology is made at this time.

SURVEY PROCEDURE AND INSTRUMENTS

Approximately 2.5 miles of additional line cutting was done to establish grid lines at 200 foot intervals across the four claims. Magnetometer and EM17L readings were taken at 100 fooc intervals along the north-south grid lines.

A Barringer GM-122 proton magnetometer was used for the magnetic survey. A magnetometer base station was established at L 128E AOS and was assigned a value of 59620 gammas. Loops were read and regular tie-ins made to the base stations at intervals generally less than one hour apart. From this data a graphical diurnal correction was applied to all data.

A Geonics EM17L Horizontal loop system using a AGO foot coil separation was employed for the HLEM survey. In phase and guadrature readings were taken at each station.

Copies of the instruments' specifications accompany this report. (appendix).

SURVEY RESULTS

The data obtained from the magnetometer survey more or less correlates with the previous work done by Prospecting Geophysics Ltd.. Better definition of the southeast trending magnetic anomaly was obtained using the 200 foot spaced lines. This magnetic trend appears to be offset between lines 134E and 136 E with the east side being shifted south. Geological mapping to date indicates the cause of this anomaly to be a southeast trending diabase dyke. The magnetic anomaly which

-3-

foughly parallels line 164E from 52S to 63S is most likely due to a north trending diabase dyke.

At this point it is difficult to say if the areas which ga\e background readings which are in the range of 750 gammas to 850 gammas are underlain entirely by metasediments or a conbination of metasediments and felsic to intermediate volcaniclastics,

The EM17L horizontal loop survey failed to delineate any real bedrock conductors.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

No further work is recommended until the geological mapping program has been completed and fully evaluated.

Respectfully submitted,

Bruce DurhamProject GeologistBell Geological Services Inc.

-4-

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONS

I, R. Bruce Durham hereby certify:

1. That I am a consulting geologist employed byDavid R. Bell Geological Services Inc., Sutie 14 251 Third Avenue, Timmins, Ontario.

2. that I am a graduate of the University of Western Ontario with a Bachelor of Science degree in geology (B. Se.) 1976.

3. that I have been practising my profession as a geologist continuously since 1976.

A. that I do not have nor do I expect to receiveneither direct or indirect any interest in this property or in the securities of Goliath Gold Mines Ltd.

Timnins, Ontario R. Bruce Durham (B.Se.) July 13, 1982 Consulting Geologist.

^ ,6 ,5900 .5905

576855I576856 '

i , *t*ei"i.Jlt l 1576691 15766931 5550 8 l l

. ~_, __ L. ._ ^^ —J.— -J^—r T B i ^

\ ' 677652J577622 677626,5775281577581 L ____

i seu ceu . \ e cu 1 ttu l *. -.*jj

t5776S4 I8T'*M l"*"7 ^ (f

- --1 -- -L- ..1677623 877624 J6. "7762 9 J 67 7 58 O 1877559 1 ! J.' L X- —-u^--^-.-^-— ,-L--,---^-,

626868 j 626664 [628866 L[63 5560 J •^58jlJ 688562

8M~ * ~" IwriT T MM~"

BOMBY TPScale r'sSs mile

DAVID R. BELL GEOLOGICAL SERVICES INC

Location of Claims covered by surveys

Area of Molson LakeGOLIATH GOLD MINES LTD

DISTRICT OF THUNDER BAY, ONT.

July 13. 1982

Horizontal-Loop Electromagnetic UnitLow Frequency Large Separation

Now there are two horizontal loop EM's available: The standard EM17, 16('Q Hz, up to 400 ft. separation and the new EM17L, 820 Hz, u| to 600 ft. separation.

FeaturesAutomatic Lightweigt Excellent i be cai ned POO, 300, Thin, light Provision 1 loop mocl( Powered b Tin.' iransrpower

meter readout to lake fast, accurate readingst coilsoise suppression in difficult conditions: Survey caniut in the vicinity of power lines

• 00 and 600 ft. coil scpaiation.viMght, unsheilded reference cable between coils)i use in coaxial loop mode as well as in horizontal-

,' easily obtainable flashlight batteries itttii can bi: switched to either normal or reduced

The outst; idmg power line noise rejection of the EM17L enables us to demonstrate the instrument right here inside Toronto

Specifications ; preliminary data sheetCoil Orientation

Quantifies Measured

Range of Stales

Coil Separa ion

Frequency of Operation

Method of Reading

Readability

Repeatabili y

Bandwidth of the Receiver System

Transmittfl' Output

Co-planar or co-axial.

Real component (in-phase) Imaginary component (quadrature).

Real: i SO'/i, HOCr/i Imag.: ± JO0/.,, ± 50?i

200, 300, 400 and 600 f t.

820 H?

Self-indicating meters for each com ponent. No manual compensation after initial nulling at start of survey.

D.25% Imag., Q.5% Real on narrower scales.

± r/o0.1 Hz

24 At -m* reduced

Dimensions:

Receiver Console

Receiver Coil

Transmitter Console

Transmitter Coil

Weights:

Receiver Console

Receiver Coil

Transmitter Console

Transmitter Coil

Shipping Weight

Instrument Supplied with

19.5 x 13.5 x 26 cm (7. 7 x 5 inches)

63 cm (25 inches diameter.)

15x8 x 26 cm (5.85 x 3. 15 inches)

63 cm (25 inches diameter.)

3.1 kg (6.83 (bs.)

2.3 kg (5 Ibs.l

3.0 kg (6.62 Ibs.)

5.0 kg (11 Ibs.)

31 kg (68 Ibs.)

.3 x 10.2

x 10.2

Consoles in leather cases (tropical-

Power - Rtceiver

Transmitter

Type of Re'erence Cable

48 At-m normal

8 cells, type CLife 60 hrs. continuous duty.

8 cells, type DLife 50 hrs. continuous duty reducedLife 7 hrs. continuous duty normal

Lightweight, ? wire cable, no shield.

ized); receiver and transmitter coils with carrying harnesses; 200, 300, 400 and 600 reference cables; two console- to-coil connecting cables and one spare; manual of operation; set of interpretation curves; one set of bat teries installed and one spare set; field shipping case.

l IMITFD D esigners 4 manufacturers LIJV1I l CL^ Q } geophysical instruments

2 Thorncliffe Park Drive,Toronto/Ontario/CanadaM4H1H2Tel: 425-1821Cables: Geonics

SPECIFICATION i: fia ''^ ' 'ri agr Seniilivily/flesilulion 1 garhrna Absolute Accur icy

~ l 2-Z

Hinge

Gradient Toliunce Operiting flin(e

Si/i

Weight

Output

Sensor

i 10 ppm - belter than ±1 gamma20.000 — 100,000 gammas in 12 ranges with 100"*. overlap 600 gammas /meter-40'F to -t 131 'F-40 'C to -t 55'CO to 100U* relative humidity (tully waterproof)console 3 5" x 7" x 11"

(9cm x 18 cm x ?8 cm) sensor 4'/i" diameter (12 cm)

AW height (11 cm) console 5.5 IDS (2.4 kg) sensor 4 O IDS (18 Kg) staff 2 O IDS (O 9 kg)5 digit incandescent filament display with a 3 or 6 second sampling ratetoroidal, omni-directional and noise cancelling

Logic Function early low battery indicator in the form of a L.E.D. notifies the operator when 250 readings remain in the power supplylock indicator - last 3 digits of the display are blanked off when the gradient is exceeded or when the instrument is operated incorrectlydigital readout test — all display readouts light up to permit visual inspection

Construction high impact low temperature plastic: poly-urethane and lexan case, shock and vibration proof mountings

Power Supply 12 alkaline "D" cells provide up to 10,000 readings

Option Accessories external battery belt staff extender sensor backsack for one-hand operation

Barringer Research Limited304 Carlingview Dr.Metropolitan TorontoRexc ale, Ontario, Canada M9W 5G2Phor e: 416-675-3870Tele): 06-989183

Representative:

5- f

4aC12NWei55 e.4982 MOLSON LAKE300

1983 05 17 2.4982

Mrs,, Audrey HayesMining RlcorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay* OntarioP7C 566

Dear Medarn:

RE:li lv'- ?fr t f T

Geophysical (Electromagnetic S Magnetometer) Survey on Mining Claims TB 576869 et al 1n the area of Molson Lake. 'f^y-jo (f

M^t

The Geophysical (Electromagnetic i Magnetometer) Survey assessment work credits as listed with my Notice of Intent dated April 18, 1983 have been approved as of the above date.

Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours very truly, V ^ f f

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management BranchWhitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380

0. K1nv1g:sc

cc: David R. Bell Geological Services Ine Timmins, Ontario

cc: Mr. R. Bruce Durham Marathon, Ontario

cc: Resident Geologist Thunder Bay, Ontario

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontari f 3

1983 04 18

Your file:

Our file: 2 .4982

Mrs. Audrey HayesMining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 566

Dear Madam:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with state ments listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.

Yours very truly,

E.F. AndersonDirectorLands Administration BranchWhitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM?A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1316

D. K1nv1g:sc

cc: R.A. ScMralU Toronto, Ontario

cc: David R. Bell Geological Services Inc Timmins, Ontario

cc: R. Bruce Durham Marathon, Ontario

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining ft Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

B45 (6/79)

For further Information, 1f required, please contact Mr. F.W. Matthews at 416/965-1380.

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Notice of Intent

for Technical ReportsOr tario

1983 04 18

2.4982

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Ac have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is me ely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits the you expected arid also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining ree irder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enc osed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on he record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If on are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your cla ns, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an xlension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If 1 ie reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not sec relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disf agarded.

If our survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" rne hod would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, wit lin the said fifleen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees nat ies, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be sut nitted direct to the Lands Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a n w statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

SAC 8 2/fa)

fctj\ M mls1 'y ot Technical Assessment File CVgl S rees Work Credits 2 . 4982Onta^P

1983 04 18

Recorded Holder R. A. SCHIRALLI

Township or Area MOLSON LAKE

Type of survey arid number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical 16

Electromagnetic days

16Magnetometer days

Radiometric days

Induced polarization . days

Section 86 (18 days

Geological days

Geochemical days

Man d iys Q Airborne D

Special provis on P9 Ground S

[3 Credits ha.'e been reduced because of partial coverage o' claims.

CD Credits havs been reduced because of corrections to work datos and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

TB 576869-70

576877-78

Special credits under section 86 (15a) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

LI not sufficient y covered by the survey L .J Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does n-t exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 86(18)-60:

828

Instruction*: -- i *̂ afvtstXsJ S&0&7 * ..jtf o A w* — H number of mining claims traversed

,,^;:;.: ;,.:7 ' •;r W c2c2/ e xceeds space on this form^taWalist. d is' "'credits ^ca^iilstedjn the ri

in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns. — Do not use shaded areas below.TheMiningAct

ype of Survey!.- ^.-^-.'OTa^twwu.i^-'H

Prospector'1 .LIcen'cK No,-

A35586RtA. Schiralli

Ae. Toronto, OntarioSuite;_Survey Companv *""* -i-;--- —*- ;l

Name and Addrttt of Author (of Gso-Technlcal report)

irn. lojp.Q.iM.rflnsAt .rjSpecial Provitior s

"'-' F6rf frlst •surwVT""

includes line cutting)

Expend, Days CrVPrefix Number

Enter 20 (ays (for each)

OeopKytlcal-^..i^sSil

- Electromagneticand enter totf '(s) here

Geological i ,

Gepphemica.l ," ;

Electrpmaflneticjcredits do not apply—-.,--.^--^ . •*-- - ' -./Vi '*i^.l-.

Expenditures (e xcludes power stripping)Type of Work Pe formed .

t :̂ f!-.-:t - Jl"' " !. .-''y^y-*'"'.-^"^••--i---"f^jSl.~.-~i-.V ^, .X,..,L ^iSfac^-A.-HiJij..!-^',;. ^Tj•"•"Vi--..-'. ",; ••'™ - ~ '~~-. :'-- .'"~~"^?\\ : ,.-'-~.~~ ''-"'

claims cpvflred by this. report of work.

-Oiie Only '-^choice. Enter number of dtiys credits per claim selected•**M ^wffjV.^^WJ

d OatA'Mfirdved at

Certification Verifying Report of Work ,; - *l:fteS(5y?il^t1tvWS^^^j-|^ittd!j|j^ri^j. -.' t 1 "'t.^SS.'-JC-tStSf' f^*"^ ^*'^'~J*i^ai*^jy^^!|^T^?^Sfci)5r'j^^^ -^^"ryppj ™.1I T;-TityT^F^Tiyfl*\.^yit,i •^v-J.-v*r*j/''1 '^r '•••-'* J;1*^."-(JKsT*:-.'i*'*i*a*V;*i:s;Ti~"'!.""-. - '-'''•'•^'-T't-.'--:-'^^^^.**--^;,-'-~--i??*-r;fvi\ffae.t'iM**f-f-'i**^'ii"~ s------ --- ' * -.-

" "or witnessed Mrrwourmg and/or alter its completion and the annexed report is true.Nam

gi^^liimsai^iiip^^J Dot* Cortlf lad

isaaBsswEsaasKaBasBESEasiTSffiBasssi^^

Ministr i ofNaturaResolves

Ontario

GeotechnicalReportApproval

Mining Lan is Comments

^ ~v~~-1

.^ ^ -- V ^.^ } tj. V V.

^ To: G.ophv.ic.

Comments

Jftpprov :d l l Wish to see again with correctionsSigna

DTo: Geolog/- Expenditures

Comments

P) Approv E'd l ) Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

To: Geochc mistry

Comments

^Q Approv E'd Q Wish to see again with corrections

Date Signature

To: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. {Tel: 5-1380)

1593 (81/10)

D R. BELL GEOLOGICAL SERVICES INC.251 THIRD AVE.. SUITE 14

BOX I2SO TIMMINS. ONTARIO

f AH 7 J5 I7OSI 2 64-4266

AugtM*. 24, 19S2. RECEIVED!AUG 2 6 1982

IANDS. N.C.R^

. A , \Mi.ni.ng R(COideA Division, blinJJi&iy ofi Na&vicit Re6ouA.ce6, P.O. Box 5000, JhandoA lay, Ontario. P7C 5G6

THUNDER BAYMINING DIVISION

•i it- ^0 ',QR?

AM A

Re: Repeat o^ Wo^ife F^Ie 576S69 C^-:m Wo. IB 5 76887 should IB ;-76S77

Wou-Cd you p^eo^e mfee tne pA,opet cn^nge Should ycu A.eqtuA.e ^uAXneA in&oimcutuM g ei -en icac^i ai youA convenience.

tAaty,

LJO^d R. Bete,

cc. R. A. R.

tkli,

1982 09 16 2.4982

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 5G6

Dear Sirt

Ve have received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims TB 576869 et al In the Area of Molson Lake.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be issued.

Yours very truly

E.P. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phonet 416/965-1316

J. Skuratsc

cct R.A. Schlralli Toronto, Ontario

cc: David R. Bell Geological Services Inc Timmins, Ontario

cc: R. Bruce Durham Marathon, Ontario

~ j \

\

\\

-rK

"l

o o * CD

o o 4-

Q

O

O o 4,

OD

O

o Qc o •K

o o -t-

o Q *

Q)

o •^ o

O Cio •K

SO

UT

H

6 O

O

- 7

00

70 o

-

900

Bo

o

~ 9

00

/QQ

O

-//

O O

//C

O

-/Z

OO

/ZO

O

-/3

OO

/3O

O

-j 4

- O O

/•to

o -

y 'j- o

o

-t-o

o S

OU

TH

GO

LIAT

H

GO

LD

M N

ESM

AG

NE

TOM

ETE

RH

EM

LO

AR

EA

TH

UN

DE

R

BAY

MIN

ING

D

IVIS

ION

O

NTA

RIO

Q

O * 00 ftj

o o -i. o fn

O O -v CN* c*\

O o -V * ** "^

o o -K N* *n V.

o o •1* 00 K)

^•fc

o Q -K O t \

•o Q s, fy

fci V -V

O oo o •N

o o * O)

o o s

o -K

o o 4.o •K N

O

E,M

. /7

X-

82 O

H

z

- O

f Z

SO

UT

H

GO

LIAT

H

GO

LD

MIN

ESEL

ECTR

OM

AGN

ETIC

S

UR

VE

Y/A

^A

/027

HE

MLO

AR

EA

THU

ND

ER

BA

Y M

ININ

G

DIV

ISIO

N

ON

TAR

IO

SC

fltf

iiiiii

iiiiii

iiiiii

iiiiin

iiiiii

ililll

llllll

llllll