42069NETOie Z.7383 PIC 010

WORK REPORT

NICOLLE ANNEX CLAIMS

HEMLO AREA

PIC AND COTTE TOWNSHIPS

THUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION

ONTARIOP F fi: M *r - NTS. 42D/9 l i : V' L J V i''

f';1 0V O V 1J?fM

^ JENS E t HANSEN

l Nepean, Ontario

t Project: 60-130October 23, 1984

•o m i m m m 1 1* i i m f m II IB 11 II HW

I N D E *2D*9NEWie 2.7383 P| C010C

J-''

fif.-

PAGE

li INTRODUCTION l

FIGURE l - LOCATION MAP

FIGURE 2 - LOCATION

II. PROPERTY LOCATION 2

III i PERSONNEL 4

IV. GEOLOGY AND PREVIOUS WORK 4

Vi PRESENT PROGRAM 5

VI i MAGNETOMETER SURVEY 6

VII. VLF-EM 6

VIII; GEOLOGY 7

IX. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS 7

Xi CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9

DECLARATION

BIBLIOGRAPHY

MAP l - Magnetic Contours

MAP 2 - VLF Contours

MAP 3 - VLF Profiles

MAP 4 - Geology

INTRODUCTION

The property consists of 17 claims straddling the contact between the Gowan Lake granodiorite pluton and the Hemlo

region metasediments. The claims are owned by Golden Rule Resources Ltd., of Calgary.

The objective of the present work is to prepare geological

and geophysical maps showing geology, structure and electro magnetic conductors.

The claims are located approximately 15 kilometres west-north west of the Hemlo gold discoveries which are now being put into production by Noranda, Lac Minerals and Teck.

The objective of the survey was to locate geophysical and geological targets to be explored in greater detail for gold. The discovery of the Hemlo deposits has led to a careful examination of the belts containing theses deposits.

* * * f * * w

GOLDEN RULE

NICOLLE ANNEX PROPERTY

HarbourFIGURE l

LOCATION MAP

Is 250,000

FROM GEOLOGICAL MAP 2220

MANITOUWADGE WAWA SHEET M

t ,

r/''?

/t,

I i

^:

' .'

'

i i -"

' *"?

*\

--*

. ;

* i

**

* .

* .

* *

i *Y

**

-j

*. .'

r\n '*

t

: -K

H^L

l l

A

*|.

.'*

\n-

"* ' io

i M--

.I

h'--

.--- .i

iff—r,!

Jx !-

lH\i*

i!,^

f

: --

li W

.-i&

f..

• y I

s. i.-^

iJ

- !

* !

-' rJ

n in

i^r

VfvT

l

K

i t

i/j

t't

i':

' '

j

-J

'•5 i'

s f

# . .

i'

-1*3

'l.

r^jj

-*H:

'. i

:OJ:

;;.

? -vj

; '

ez

- t

.-^i;

-.' -f ^

'\i

\* z

*-

*!-V

.*

* i "r

^..'

i^|-^

f*s

•-i

' V

i "i '

i;? -f

f^y 'f

.-j 'j

~ -

J—-

. *

" *

* **

• s

*s '

s .

r u -

-t!

*1 'l ^

J'

j ' :

i^ l

' *:

*:*

'i

' '

': . j

r '

f Jo

k r H

ri'

4*!J

sQ'V

j

S'?

':.•S

* - x

i -

Jy '^

.-S .?

^;

.5

'J&

j-. ,-

.

•N

. c;, s

i',

i j

j^f'

^-\*'

j -j --j

^f^j

V

; t

r*.*

*

JJL

J

* .' *

.

*

r -f

v*?

-si '

r'*Sf

;?--*

-j *^**-1

-~''

f *!

S^

V?

- 5

. ,

-r^f

l-

i -H?

i i

v-r

' 'A--'

5

^:}

t

*

*

k

. *

J r.*

.tr-*

- - :

; K

. :

. --

?' i

^ -

'

f ^-'

!r^

; -r

! -S

;:;

5- :

-t *^ *-

^l

i' t

' *

~.

:-i'1

'

\ ^•:.1 -

1:•15

-" -i-

i^

-i'T

. jV..

j. t.

,.f

*

. ^ ":*

" j'S

^;i

'I'b i

-

11

: -.:

-J

- i

: "i

f t

.i

.;

\.-

_j.-

_

T^r^

x! a

T^r

^-^p

v-if

-r-j

rT-.

-l

t .-i f!' 1

'Ic

bJ'j

^.;

;f 1

1Tr^

L-j-j

PI?

! T

T'T

-T

FIG

UR

E 2

LOC

ATI

ON

l"

= l

mil

e5^

i :j-

m

•.'•-•.o

^-vT1

.?j :

-2-

II. PROPERTY LOCATION

There are no bush roads or trails to the property so the

only practical means of access is by helicopter from a

base at Cedar Lake or alternatively from a base at

Marathon. Marathon is 15 kilometres to the west and Cedar

Lake is 25 kilometres to the east. The claim group' is 4 kilometres north of the TransCanada Highway and the CPR

railroad.

The location of the property is shown on FIGURES l and 2.

The following claims were surveyed:

CLAIM NO i

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

s:9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

767523

767524

767548

767549

767550

767551

767552

767553

767554

767555

767556

767557

767558

767559

DATE STAKED

June

June

June

JuneJune

June

JuneJune

June

June

June

June

June

June

16,

16,

16,

16,

16,

16,

16,16,

17,

17,

17,

17,

17,

18,

1983

1983

1983

19831983

1983

19831983

1983

1983

1983

1983

1983

1983

DATE RECORDED

June

June

JuneJuneJune

June

June

June

June

'June

June

June

June

June

30,

30,

30,

30,

30,

30,

30,30,

30,

30,

30,

30,

30,

30,

ON EXTENSION TO

1983

1983

1983

19831983

1983

19831983

1983

1983

1983

1983

1983

1983

November

NovemberNovemberNovemberNovember

NovemberNovemberNovember

November

NovemberNovember

NovemberNovember

November

30,

30,

30,

30,30,

30,

30,30,

30,

30,

30,

30,

30,

30,

TOWNSHIP

1984

1984

1984

1984

1984

1984

19841984

1984

1984

1984

1984

1984

1984

Cotte Twp.

Cotte Twp.

Cotte Twp.

Cotte Twp.Cotte Twp.

Cotte Twp.

Pic Twp.Pic Twp.

Pic Twp.

Pic Twp.

Cotte Twp.

Cotte Twp.

Pic Twp.

Pic Twp.

3

CLAIM NO. DATE DATE ON EXTENSION TOWNSHIPSTAKED RECORDED TO

15. 767569 June 19, 1983 June 30, 1983 November 30, 1984 Pic Twp.

16. 767570 June 20, 1983 June 30, 1983 November 30, 1984 Pic Twp.17. 767571 June 20, 1983 June 30, 1983 November 30, 1984 Pic Twp.

* * * f *

-4-

III. PERSONNEL

The ground geophysical and geological surveys were carried out by Wade Kornik and Tim Elliott, both third year geology students at Carleton University in Ottawa. They were assisted by Albert Audet of Val d'Or.

The author compiled the data and prepared this report from their field data. He did not visit the property.

IV. GEOLOGY AND PREVIOUS WORK

The general vicinity has received some attention for base

metals during the 1960's and 70's because of the presence of felsic and mafic volcanics. It is possible that the claims may have been covered by past airborne geophysics

however there is no evidence of any work in the assessment

files.

The Geological Survey of Canada Aeromagnetic program covered

the entire region and this data has provided information concerning the regional geological trends. The area was

also covered by the G*S*Ci regional lake sediment sampling

program carried out in 1978.

Aerodat Limited flew a helicopter survey over the entire

Hemlo region inearly 1983. This data was sold on a non

exclusive basis.

The claim group straddles the contact between the Gowan Lake Pluton and intermediate to felsic volcanics consisting

mainly of flows and tuffs in this particular region.

The Hemlo gold deposits are hosted by a sequence of meta-

-5-

volcanics and metasedimetns.

The main orebody is composed of a group of stratabound,

pyrite-rich siliceous and locally barite rich metasediments which are probably of chemical sedimentary derivation.

One objective of the geophysical survey is to locate pyrite

rich horizons.

V. PRESENT PROGRAM

The geophysical program consisted of a proton magnetometer

survey (Geometrics 846 Unimag II) and a VLF-EM survey {Geonics

EM-16) on lines which were laid out using a hip chain for

distance control and labelled flagging at 25 metre intervals

using a compass. The survey lines were tied in to claim posts

and tie lines were surveyed at the ends of the grid. The lines

were spaced at 100 metre intervals with geophysical readings

taken at 12.5 metre intervals.

A geological observation was made at each station and the

nature of the outcrop was reported whenever outcrop was observed.

Boulders were observed at a number of stations but these

have not been reported on the map. Where no observation is

indicated on the map, the bedrock was obscured by overburden.

A total of 28 line kilometres of profile was surveyed.

-6-

VI. MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

The G-846 magnetometer measures the total value of the earth's

magnetic field to a precission of one gamma. The data has been contoured to an interval of 250 gammas and it is presented at

a scale of 1:2,500 on MAP-1.

An independent ground base station was not operated. The data was levelled and corrected to readings taken along the tie lines. A base reading was taken at 2 to three hour inter vals at station 4S on line 4W which was adjacent to the camp

setup.

VII. VLF-EM

This survey was completed using a Geonics EM-16 instrument.

This is a one man-instrument which measures the distortion (in degrees and as a percentage of the transmitted primary field) caused by a secondary electromagnetic field from con

ductors in the ground. Various types of conductive sources can

cause an anomalous VLF-EM reading. Among these are conductive sulphides, graphite, clayey material in shear zones, clays in swamps or bedrock depressions. Fresh water is not conductive

as seen by the VLF-EM unit.

The primary electromagnetic field is transmitted by radio

transmitters communicating with submarines. There is a net

work of such transmitters around the world and the station used

for this survey was Cutler Maine (NAA) operating at a frequency of 24.0 kHz.

* * * f 9 t l

-7-

The results from this survey are presented in profile form on MAP-2 and in contour form on MAP-3. The contours were generated

from the inphase dip angle using the standard Fraser numerical

filtering technique.

VIII. GEOLOGY

Geological observations were made by the geophysical operators

at each station along the grid. The results are presented at a

scale of 1:2,500 on MAP-4. The map also shows contacts and structure as interpreted from the mapping and the magnetics.

No attempt was made to look at the geology in the vicinity of the conductors in detail nor were there samples taken for

chemical analysis.

IX. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

The magnetic contour map quite clearly shows the contact

between felsic meta volcanics and the Gowan Lake pluton. The

interpreted contact is shown on MAP-4. Several magnetic narrow

trends of low magnetic readings traverse the pluton in a west-

northwesterly direction (approximately 115 0 )i These appear

to cross the contact of the pluton and metavolcanics and may

be indicative of shear zones. It should be noted that the 105 to

115 0 direction of the mineralized zone of the Hemlo orebodies.

While any relationships between the trends on the property and

.../..o

-8-

those at Hemlo is speculation. The trends should nevertheless be checked in detail particularly those with associated con ductors.

Six VLF-EM conductors were mapped by the survey. The majority are long, relatively straight, continuous features which traverse several lines. The conductors are listed below:

CONDUCTOR LENGTH on property

COMMENTS FOLLOWUP

200 m (115 0 ) strike

This conductor is located within the mapped meta- volcanic metasedimentary unit.

YES

B

D

1200 m (115 0 ) strike

600 m (080 0 ) strike

600 m (115 0 ) strike

500 m (115 0 ) strike

100 m

It occurs within the Gowan YES Lake pluton and coincides directly with a magnetic low. It is highly probably caused by a major shear. Conductor A may be an extension of this conductor into the metasedi mentary unit.

This conductor is located YES along the contact between the Gowan Lake pluton and the metasedimentary unit.

Sharp crossovers are noted YES on three lines namely: 1+OOE, 8+OOE and 7+OOE. It occurs within the Gowan Lake pluton.

It occurs within the Gowan NO Lake pluton.

Pyritic schist with meta- YES sediments was noted by the geophysical operator at this location.

* * * j 9 9 y

9—

X, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Geological mapping, prospecting, rock sampling and geo

chemistry should be carried out on the conductors listed

on the previous page.

It would not initially be necessary to examine the long features along their entire length but the work could

be confined to the strongest portions (strongest cross

overs) .

Any further work on the claims would be dependent on the

results of the above recommendations.

Conductors A, F, C and B are considered the best targets

in that order of priority.

Respectfully submitted,

JENS E 4 HANSE

Geophysicist

DECLARATION

I, Jens Eskelund Hansen of the City of Nepean, in the Muni

cipality of Ottawa-Carleton do hereby declare:

1. That I am a consulting geophysicist residing at 19

Nesbitt Street, Nepean, Ontario K2H 8C4.

2. That I am a graduate of Engineering Physics of Queen's

University, Kingston, Ontario in 1964 and have been

continuously engaged as a practicing geophysicist since

that time, and I am a Registered Professional Engineer

in the Province of Ontario.

3. That the foregoing report is based on personal supervision

and examination of the geophysical and geological data

discussed in the report.

JENS Ei HANSEN, P 4 Eng

Geophysicist

Nepean, Ontario

October 30, 1984

BIBLIOGRAPHY

MAPS

MAP 2220 - Geological Compilation Series - Manitouwadge-Wawa sheet Scale l" = 4 miles.

MAP 5093 - NOEGTS Data Base map - Heron Bay Scale 1:100,000.

MAPS 2156G, 2157G - Geological Survey of CanadaGeophysical Series (Aeromagnetic) 1:50,000

MAPS 42D/9, 42D/16 - Department of Energy Mines and ResourcesTopographical Maps Scale 1:50,000

REPORTS

Bartley and Page, 1957 : A Geological Report on the Hemlo AreaDepartment of Industrial Development, CPR.

Milne V.G., 1968 : Geology of Black River Area - ODM Report 72.

Muir T.L if 1982 : Geology of the Hemlo Area - OGS Report 217.

Muir T.L., 1982 : Geology of the Heron Bay Area - OGS Report 218.

42009NEeeie 2 .7383 PIC

Mining Lands Section

Control Sheet

File No

900

TYPE OF SURVEY / GEOPHYSICAL

GEOLOGICAL

GEOCHEMICAL

EXPENDITURE

MINING LANDS COMMENTS:

7/" - V . ^Lf^'/ii 7/x? 7 /̂ t''t ~~

Signature of Assessor

Date

1985 06 04 Your Filet 593 Our File: 2.7383

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 566

Dear Madam:

RE: Notice of Intent dated May 13, 1985 Geological Survey on Mining Claims TB 767523, et al, In the Township of Pic and the Area of Rous Lake

The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.

Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely.

S. E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-4888

D. Isherwood:me

cc: Jens E. Hansen Nepean, Ontario

cc: Mr. 6.H. FergusonMining ft Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

cci Resident Geologist Thunder Bay, Ontario

End.

A— r\ Ministry or Technical AssessIVy) Natural . ., . - . .. \V/ ^ources Work CreditsOntario ^0

ment ™*2.7383

Date Mining Recorder's Report of Work No.

19RR np IS 593

Recorded Holder JENS E. HANSEN

Township or Area ROMS lAKE. PIC TOWNSHIP

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

Electromagnetic . , ri*y*

Rprlinmatrir rtayc

|n^i,|(;or( pnlari7atinn rlayi

Section 77 (19) S** "Mining Claims Assessed" column

5 Geological ..,, , , , , . . ,,...-—. days

Man days D Airborne CD

Special provision EX! Ground G3

GD Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

Q Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Attested

TB 767523 767548 767550 to 559 Inclusive 767569 to 571 Inclusive

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

LJ not sufficiently covered by the survey Li Insufficient technical deta filed

K 767524 767549

1 The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on t each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77(19) — 60:

828

ano

Ministry ofNaturalResources

1985 05 13 Your File: 593 Our File: 2.7383

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 5000 . .Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 5G6

Dear Madam:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.For further information, if required, please contact Mr. R.J. Pichette at 416/965-4888.

rs sincerely,

frundt *ctor

Land Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

/)D. 'Isherwood:me

Ends.

cc: Jens E. Hansen19 Nesbitt StreetNeoean, OntarioK2H 8C4

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining S Lands CommissionerToronto, Ontario

845

(sgOntario

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Notice of Intent

for Technical Reports

1985 05 13 2.7383/593

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Land Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

ste tes/s)

Report of WorkMinistry of

Se'soles (Geophysical, Geological, Ontario ^^ Geochemical and Expenditures)

(Type of SurveyU

The Mining Act

Jructioni: — Please type or prin ^^^^claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Note: — Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

- Do not use shaded areas below.

Claim HolderU)

Geology (VLF and Magnetics) ^^ ____ Report of wojrk.-^reYiQysly submitted Pic Twp. G-630

Prospector's Licence No.

Area ROUS Lake Area

JENS E. Hansen for Coldon Rule RooouroooAddress

'rospactor

A45202

19 Nesbitt Street, Nepean, Ontario K2H 8C4Survey Company

Geotest CorporationDate of Survey (from 61 to) ]Total Miles of line Cut

17Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

_______JENS E. HANSEN, 19 Nesbitt Street, Nepean, Ontario K2H 8C4

13

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (Thisincludes line cutting)

For each additional survey:using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here

Airborne Credits

Nota: Special provisionscredits do not applyto Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

. ... _ _ __

.

20

Days per Claim

. _ . ____

Days perClaim

——————

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Dayi Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

15Instructions

Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of dayt credits per claim selected in columns at right.

DateOctober 23, l?

Recorded Hold*

84 S,Signature)

Certification Verifying Report of-Work

167148767549767550

CEIVEOV 15 1984

LANDS: SECTION

iAYDIVISION

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

For Office Us* Only

\ hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person CertifyingJens E. Hansen, 19 Nesbitt Street, Nepean, Ontario K2H 8C4

Date Certified Certified byi

1362 181/9)

•f.-

November 5, 1984

DirectorLand Management Branch 6643 Whitney Block TORONTO, Ontario M7A 1W3

Dear Sir:

Re; Mining Claims TB767523-24; TB767548-559incl. TB767569-71 incl. Jens E. Hansen^^.^^^^^

He are enclosing herewith duplicate copies of technical

work reports relating to the above noted mining claims.

Yours very tvuly.

Audrey M. Hayes (Mrs.)Mining RecorderThunder Bay Mining DivisionOntario Government Building435 S. James StreetP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 5G6

Telephones (807) 475-1311

'J*

w M V * ^Vi',Ministryo1 Report of WorkNatural ,-- . . , - . . ,Resources (Geophysical, Geological,^^ Geochemical and Expenditures)

' i/ 767535

7^0- f J) O C

^J^ f~*1{-'

The Mining Act

Instructions:,— Please type or print. ^^^— I f number or mining claims traversed

exceeds ipaca on this form, attach a list.Note: - Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

— Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Survey(t)

Claim Holder(s)

Township or Area X1 ., X//

^ fa* c #A?

Addresss.i/.-y*,' .-* 11st-t/r-f~ '

Prospectors Clone* No,

Survey Company

fievresr57

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

Date of Survey (from 81 to)IT . 6 iM ' \ / i" 7Day l Mo. | Yr. | Day | Mo. | Yr. |

Total Miles of line Cut

5 TCredits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

Airborne Creditt

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

to20

Days per Claim

---- - —

—— ~ —

Days per Claim

——————

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Totel ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Date

f 2 7Certification Verifying Popart of Work

Total number of mining claims covered by |his report of work.

1 hereby certify that 1 have a personal or witnessed same during and/or after

Nnrno nml Pottal

l//;',-/ 5

Add reft of P*f*onX'/

, ".'.A'' '"

and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed neTeto, having its completion and the annexed report is true.

Cwftif ying

/^Al^/J

/^ / S

/51 W

fh'f 'f-/

c S 'If ?'

performed the work

. _ , -f

Date Certified ""^5^^^13G2 (81/9)

PIC TWP.M.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE D ISTRICT

TERRACE BAYMINING DIVISION

THUNDER BAYLAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION

THUNDER BAY

kb

rjm\l ] (Twp.

GEOTEST CORPORATIONP.O. Box 11385 Station "H" 19 Nesbitt Street Nepean, Ontario, Canada K2H 7V1Project: 60-095A

April 18, 1985

Telephone: 613 828-6462 Telex: 053-3911PLEASE NOTE:our telephone no.613-726-1508

is now:

Mr. D. IsherwoodLand Management BranchWhitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3

Dear Mr. Isherwood:

RE: YOUR FILE 2.7383MINING RECORDER'S FILE: 593.575

I am returning the geological maps referred to in your letter dated February 7, 1985 which follows our telephone conversation where you suggested that the data could be evaluated for partial geological credits as it stands.

The work was done by summer students and it is not as complete as it should be. The only acceptable way to increase the detail would be to return to the area this summer and to undertake addi tional geological surveying. I don't think there is anything that can be done to improve the present maps without doing more work.

Yours sincerely,

JENS E. HANSEN Geophysicist

Resource:' •Ontario

February 7, 1985 Our File: 2.7383Mining Recorder's

File: 593,575

Jens E. Hansen 19 Nesbitt Street Nepean, Ontario K2H 8C4

Dear Sir:

RE: Geophysical {Electromagnetic, Magnetometer) and Geological Surveys submitted on Mining Claims IB 767523, et al, 1n Pic Township and the Area of Rous Lake

This will acknowledge receipt of the above-mentioned survey on November 7, 1984. Enclosed are the geological plans, in duplicate.

In areas where there 1s no outcrop, please show on the plans the nature of the overburden.

Also, please provide a more comprehensive written description of the rock types encountered and the nature of the overburden.

Finally, please Indicate whether the lines were cut or merely chained and flagged.

Please forward the above Information, 1n duplicate, to this office quoting file 2.7383.

For further Information, please contact Doug Isherwood at (416)965-4888.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 'Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-4888

r D. Isherwood:mc cc: Mining RecorderThunder Bay, Ontario

End.

REGISTERED

March 13, 1985 File: 2.7383

Jens E. Hansen 19 Nesbitt Street Nepean, Ontario K2H 8C4

Dear Sir:

RE: Geophysical (Electromagnetic 4 Magnetometer) and Geological Survey submitted on Mining Claims TB 767523. et. al., In the Township of Pic and the Area of Rous Lake

Enclosed Is a copy of our letter dated February 7, 1985 requesting additional Information for the above-mentioned survey.

Unless you can provide the required data by Narch 22, 1985 the mining recorder will be directed to cancel the geological work credits recorded on November 2, 1984.

For further Information, please contact Mr. Ray Plchette at (416)965-4888.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management BranchWhitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1U3 Phone:(416)965-4888S. Hurst:wecc: Mining Recorder

Thunder Bay, Ontario File: 1593

Encl.

February 7, 1985 Our File: 2.7383 Mining Recorder's

Flit: 593,575

Jtns E. Nansen 19 Nesbitt Strtft Nepean, OnUrlo K2H 8C4Dtar Sir:

RE: Geophysical (Electromagnetic, Magnetometer) and Gtologlcal Surveys submitted on Mining Claim TB 767523, tt al, 1n Pic Township and the Area of Rous Lake

This will acknowledge receipt of the above-mentioned survey on November 7, 1984. Enclosed are the geological plans, In duplicate.

In areas where there 1s no outcrop, please show on the plans the nature of the overburden.

Also, please provide a wore comprehensive written description of the rock types encountered and the nature of the overburden.

Finally, please Indicate whether the lines *ere cut or merety chained and flagged.

Heasi forward the abfve Information, 1n duplicate, to this office quoting file 2.7383.

For further Information, please contact Doug {sherwood at (416)965-4888.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1M3 Phone:(416)965-4888D. Isherwood:mc End.

cc: Mining Recorder Thunder Bay, Ontario

Ontario

Ministry ofNaturalRe^mrces

GeotechnicalReportApproval

File

2.

Mining Lands Comments

/l///) HAPS MO l C A T t: S0T C&r.

Tkty /i 'Ate . C. CAefrrs. /s TMS

if. MOT is TH/S 6, 'f '0*06 /c v?/.

/tr** He

T H fTo: Geophysics

Comments

approved

te To: Geology - E)Comments

f~l Approved

To: Geochemistry

Comments

[| Approved

J '

,

To: Mining Lands Sec

1693(81/10)

^ frA*v*J^y ^

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

FUc.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s) Geophysics and Geology________

Township or Area Pic and Cotte Twp. G-630, G-611Claim Holder(s) Jens E; Hansen for Golden Rule

Resources Ltd./"i-f-o g t-

Jens E; HansenSurvey Company- Author of Report. Address of Anthnr 19 Nesbitt Street, Nepean, Ont.Covering Dates of Survey ^une 25 to July 15, 1984

(linecutting to office)T * m,ri FT- n * 28 kilometresTotal Miles of Line Cut——————^————^-^-——————......——

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer——Radiometric———Other——————

DAYS per claim,

20

Geological. 20

Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

DATE:. SIGNATURE:'Heport or Agent

Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.Previous Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

TB 767523 ,,.,,,.———,

767548

767549

767550

767551

767552

767553

767554

767555

767556

.767.55.8.

767559

..7.6756.9.

767570

(number)

.767.57.1.............

THUNDER BAY.

iSI,M

TOTAL CLAIMS

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS - If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations. Station interval —— Profile scale^—^—Contour interval.

2,240

12.5 metres1;2,500 horizontal scale

.Number of Readings 2,240 JLine spacing ———— 100 metres

Magnetics - 250 gammas

y Instrument. Geometrics Unimaq II G-846

Accuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method.

l gammaLine values levelled to base line readings.

3 hours^^^^^^^^^^^^-^^^^^^———^-—Base Station check-in interval (hours)—Base Station location and value Base station not used.

ic

ot

toj

Instrument, Geonics EM16 VLF

Coil configuration pip angle t remote transmitter

Coil separation .^-^-———--—^-^^——..———.—.—.———— Accuracy In-phase l degree, quadrature J.%

Method: d Fixed transmitter Cutler Maine 24.0 kHz.

Q Shoot back Q In line D Parallel line

Parameters(ipecify V.L.F. nation)

In-phase dip angle (degrees) Quadrature (l)

*31

InstrumentScale constantCorrections made.

Base station value and location

Elevation accuracy.

Z C

s

tt

Q •25

Instrument ————————— Method D Time DomainParameters — On time .

— Off time— Delay time ———

— Integration time.

O Frequency Domain _ Frequency _____ Range —-—————

Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing . Type of electrode

SELF POTENTIALInstrument,—————————-——————,^^—-—;______________ Range.Survey Method ______________________________—^____ -

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument-——Values measured.Energy windows (levels) ____________________________________ Height of instrument_________________________Background Count. Size of detector -—————.——-—————-—-——^—-—.^-^.^—.——.—.-.^—.—...^——.. Overburden _____________________________________________

(type, depth - include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey—————————————————————— Instrument ————————————————————————— Accuracy—————————————————————————Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s) ——— Instrument(s) —————

(ipedfy for each type of survey) Accuracy—————————————————

(ipecify for each type of lurvey) Aircraft used———————————————————————————————Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude———-———-——————-—-———.———,..^—.—.Line SparingMiles flown over total area———————^————————...—^—Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

i Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain—————————

Drainage Development.Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis.

ANALYTICAL METHODS Values expressed in: per cent

p. p. m. p. p. b.

a a aCu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle)

Others__________________'Field Analysis (.

Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory Analysis No.{————^—^-..

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used ——

Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method—— Reagents Used————

.tests)

.tests)

-tests)

GeneraL General.

ano

Ministry ofNaturalResources

November 5, 1984

DirectorLand Management Branch6643 Whitney BlockTORONTO, OntarioM7A 1W3

Dear Sir:

Re: Mining Claims TB767523-24; TB767548-559incl. TB767569-71 incl. Jens E. Hansen——————--.

We are enclosing herewith duplicate copies of technical

work reports relating to the above noted mining claims.

Yours very truly,

rfj^Audrey M. Hayes (Mrs.)Mining RecorderThunder Bay Mining DivisionOntario Government Building435 S. James StreetP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 5G6

Telephone: (807) 475-1311

1984

S& fl

f*CAI O

O'Neill Twp Cotte Twpv ! wp

P jnflif'. 3 ''C

A-'Owk' ins

i - ' n o

*^'

^

^^ _ _. ___t .Lff97*ff-tJV72(.\.

M a r a t h\o-n D i -4 t rm p r o v 8 l m e -, t

Marathcin*-

A'&SS't UjW.55? fcs" 8* f , f"', T'i

fy.L 4.^^.5?!

C'/r

e

fxO-ty-^U

f\h v' v

30,- t O'r

Ree 1

^l -

^^

0r

/r

A

Pt

/?l

/9IMO

rH e /'^

"

5 ^5^,^-4^/'

.VJk 1"^ o•w^-

' X^4"fo

VJC..P•— Nj

/-'x'

•' " , ^jhUrt^r 1 ./J* — .

-^UfriLSrO ,^-i -i y '' 1c3^--. - ^

4-^ -

\Lj*Vfo9 r-.^~^k i^k*^-^ ̂^i-'' ^^ ~" -r- -j' f

•f^ - T ^-^^•^LyjffA Q T " J ^

? ,rJ 6 t7f8^ .S- ~^rJ^. ——— -

a "~'f\" -; -s ' '

^^

(eSfp-aH 1

•"

1

VP

t 1

*- c 1

5fcS4/

.

5^54515

' ZSSt

x ' f 'ifbZStZ^ ^ r ,f -o

^ —

!fft*252U

(o(,25JA\

- r;";'

^tiff/i( ^( xf^

J ^ r ;' '

Co*

iJ35T/

i

(*(*4S27

6UX5 ZJ

^(oiSL^

t^^A^Ji-x' ^*j- j- "~~'

*r~

^*

\

^^"

/^ ^fcl

T-t- - - ——

': ' .

*'

*—— 1"-

- "A"' .'v ' - f **r- . Sf^Nl3 x "if jr ' i^Si ^ j S ^•J (-!?'^**^i

bS(.5^3 ' t,U23U,V

. y . j... . ___ .. U-^fab 3i'

.J*.^55^(rffoc:9'~t f '"Hn ^fe^i jgjf-z.^^ /-'..^w

" ' 1 -" -' WJ '' 'tW55 )^ 5^ W^"- *v P^? - - . ^

' ' Z5*3 fr**9*5\^2*'H,'^2w7t^LS4X-- — - - -i

GA

(.UMzU^*? 1

^

W*25i3

,U5C6

\̂x

^

fet*9rt

U256^

b (eZ 503S l

vSs^

11

t . ^2535 , bieZSffl latoZsS^i (0^233 f "

f , T -'

l 6^

,1** S .1^u*t5/? (*(*z;ii fo ^-^ '

1 . fll ''^ ' ' A

v ̂* ^

'' '''*^^;^'

A *\^7*vN'' f i~{^in-

p,c . '' /7 'p /- ' -CI

V v e ^.:. 7 yOL ' _ - v ^7

-**f^^*^ t^^r^^uV'" S c^fv- S - ^/^.^^ pu

r . .o^ ^ y^1x x *y.?r

P C

.^*3

,* *)'

t*u,^5bZ.v ^ ,

,*^*/ l - ^ '•f . v .^',? /' f^^ ' .1 l

- \\ iRIVIER \ t \ /:

*j

• V

1

1 n d i D n i

R•-. . s

u, . i1

6 s e r v e. ' - r

y NO 9q ^. '#/- - o ,.

? W - ffi. -ix^1 i^^7p^ ' ^^6

y* -ft?

^y•^tit t o!

\4if04

~^^ , —— ̂ ———

( --, l64tfof

MA

b?^'.?^/9/*

^ -" —— f ^/'

ti5M tw#6

^5 ffi ifcffl

64t*t// W/frf

iIf^/ /J-/L— '^4/^jy "ftie""^

C L

^ASKWA- T- - 4

K Jt"^v/^t, e

64' 3 "2 -^ "'f, 7

14W6

MIM^

2 5 2 6 . ': '"

NAT.

^— i-jx v"-^ — 7 x x x X

- i i .—

w/? 1 ? rf*;. /- 1 '-

^/•fjj?^/^^

4^/fj; ^/^^

FG —g- ---1PARK

———

*4t?l7

tt, J3 S'

fotfs -7'

J^— —— *

^4f^w

^"^^^— ̂w

ft

/-^ , *#

Hi'fSj

u;?te

^ '#4t:-J N (t-ita*, i .A

0 1 V 1 b l .

x

\̂

i

\k

*9

^f

7

C4 . 9J5

*4."?3*

tttftf

^flS. j

.--. 1

M 1

1

^4.^2

Wtf4f, ^\}

-^-•—^•s — ̂

l")

{W i 141

r44/144

^'145

—i5

,--. i^

-

^•^ f ' *rlo

64tf47

^.-^.,

? ^.

, : :-l

i4,'M fr*,S?e

^-f'4\^ rwl 7~

W ft S.;* ft S

't&Z*-- - \ ^4.^1

\6fsfy /-r, /7^

44/S7S

v

i-^/: ^//*i t t

'r - -^ ' -. r,.

/^•^

to 1...5^

i J-3^ ?

C?- S/A

i *. 5/5/0 [^5/S//

is/s/y

"•* V y .-^, .0"^

\\i, 5/5/2

^ 5/J-/J

-*y/Jli^

j j/f-t f ~-t.5 4

~^sy?

bt^.'i

-t-

^^

42D09NEeeH0 2.7383 P IC 200ALL ISLANDS WITHIN 2 MILE

LIMIT FORM PART OF NAT PARK-'

rr-

c **J~~p ^f C ;ra e

- -x.^ ^ ̂e N: *! * "

W , '- '5 rioted

D i V l S ION

A " C; r i'V.

T"! , nj ^ '(*-

R E K

Am*

Land unler fhewoiers of Lake C-up

frcm stokmq by Order in Cojncil doted

Area s hown thus : \xxxxji and islands in front

of concession 2 to concession 6. subject to Sec'.'-

(18 of T:,e Mining Act

(*A,

SAND AND GRAVEL

(G, j M T C- P; T 256 Gro**' K.le 22G..O

90538

IE 14 5r

3I6

3I 7

?D-2 Sra.H C,'* i

It , If a H r,i* .

ID -aiC- 10

1 ' - A'M*

AREAS jyi.THDRAVVN FROM D lSTOSITt^N

S.R.-SURFACE RIGHTS IVLPf. - MINING RtGHTS

^___ Description Order No. Dat* Ditpotition P ila

W NCR 4O/BI

WNCR43/8I

WNCR43/8I

S R WITHDRAWN

S R a M.R WITHDRAWN

^ \ V \r K, oy ^ -x r' " v*,. ** v s

\\ce.*.c.e

i-^'^ic:/^ s 7/g 4

'J T ^ ^i-Cf T

DISPO CB6WII LANDS

rtaT

SAND 8,

NOTE y' LI

AREA

PIC TWP.M N R ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT

TERRACE BAYMINING DIVISION

THUNDER BAYLAND 'MILES/ REGISTRY DIVISION

HUNDER BAY

Natural r^.n Resources L.,. l t .h

1982M.,

G-630

S

f"

S*

* x

w P

b

31 CO H

S

X-

D

On

o —

C O

m T

H

en

O

a i -i t/i O

H)

Q

Z -n

3J O M TJ

O

W H O

Z

OJO

Cf

tm

^

O -

O X

o -

o S

J

33

^

o

m

~n

m o

m C/)

PIC

TOW

NSHI

PFO

R S

TATU

S

OF

LAN

DS

IN

P

IC

TWP

R

EFE

R

TO

TO

W.N

SH

IP

PLA

N

G-6

30

LEC

OU

RS

TWR

G-2

863

WAB

IKO

BA

LAKE

G

-620

01 Of)

s i

O

S :*

Z

O II g o

0-5

v* o

^

>

m

o r o -

m

>

V)

•25 0 =

0-

m M o*

PS y O Z

Z c

S2

'5

S

S ?

Z

2

-n

Z^

>

> ^

H

m g

o ;

X

C) 3 5 O

w

!S

m "

o o

g*

9

m

mz

? 2

*z

5 g

5o

S ^ l

30 ? i

a5

* ?

2x

t ^

n^

m

t i

t i

i t

i 'ifiiii

4G

QB

CO

*

CO

o

s m C

Z

m Z

O>

S

—

5

30

—

J*

(/J

*

—30

r-

H

s;

O 5

*ii*

slen

-n

W

O

-r

i ?

p

Z J

r-

wC

s >

O c

X

Z

30 H

3D

w

en

H o

x

5 2

5 s

S r.

S i

en

m

"'

O

C m8 1 2 g

"

O'

w .'r

O m

f"

i?w

tn O

m 3

O ^

l' i .V

^ ±

x o

m z

^ r

o

5 tn

5C

O

(B

mz

o >

^

m

K e

nen

^

m"l

i•o

en>

' w m O

O Oz D X O C H m

o

2O

c :1w—

i C30

— —

5^:5*

5 "s

^lz

o

Or

^^ip

5S

m

-n

m ^

m

z

o

m C/)

PI 7

675

—

0 +

00

BA

SE

LIN

E

1+00

S

—

2 +

00

S

—

3 +

00

S

—

4 +

00

S

—

5 +

00 S

— 6

-l-

00 S

—

7 +

00 S

8 +

OO

S

9 +

00 S

——

10

+0

0 S

——

II

+0

0 S

12+

OO

S

o

o + o l -J

LU

O oUJ o

o + OJ t

UJ o

o l -J

UJ o o -f-UJ o

o

UJ o

o + IO l

LUU

J o o + OD

UJ O

O O)

UJ o

o * o l

NO

TE

HO

RIZ

ON

TAL

CO

NTR

OL

WAS

BY

C

OM

PASS

, H

IP-C

HA

IN

AND

FLAG

GIN

G,

WIT

H

TIE

IN

TO

TI

E

LIN

ES

AND

CLA

IM

POST

S

N1C

OLL

EAN

NEX

( 17

C

LAIM

S)

I- UJ 1-

I- o

o

LOC

ATIO

N

MAP

l" =

1/2

mile

GO

LDEN

R

ULE

RES

OU

RC

ES

LTD

NIC

OLL

E AN

NEX

C

LAIM

S H

EMLO

AR

EA

NTS

4

2D

/9

SURVEY

DATA

PARAMETERS

SURVEYED BY

REPORT BY

DATE

PROJECT

SCAL

E

PRO

TON

MAG

NET

OM

ETER

( U

NIM

AG T

T)M

AG

NE

TIC

C

ON

TOU

RS

C

ON

TOU

R

INTE

RVA

L 25

0gom

mos

GEO

TEST

CO

.G

EOTE

ST

CORP

ORA

TIO

N JU

LY

1984

60

- 13

0

MA

P10

0400

6OO

nf ^

64

2D

09

NE

90

I0

2.7

383

PIC

PI 7

6756

—

0 +

00

B

AS

ELI

NE

—

l -h 0

0 S

2 4-

00 S

—

3 +

00

S

—

4 +

00

S

—

5 +

00 S

— 6

-l-

00 S

—

7 +

00

S

—

8 +

00

S

—

9 -l-

00

S

——

10

+0

0 S

— I

I +

00

S

— 1

2 +

OO

S

o o + o l -l

UJ o

oU

J o o + CJ l

UJ o o + ro

UJ o

o -I-UJ o o

UJ o o + in l

UJ o o N l -J

UJ

O

O + 00

UJ o o -1-

UJ o

o l -l

NO

TEH

OR

IZO

NTA

L C

ON

TRO

L W

AS

BY

CO

MPA

SS,

HIP

-CH

AIN

A

ND

FL

AG

GIN

G,

WIT

H

TIE

IN

TO

T

IE

LIN

ES

AN

D C

LAIM

PO

STS

NiC

OLL

EAN

NEX

17

CLA

IMS

UJ

H

O

O

LOC

ATIO

N

MAP

l" ~

1/2

mile

GO

LDEN

R

ULE

RES

OU

RC

ES

LTD

NIC

OLL

E AN

NEX

C

LAIM

S H

EMLO

AR

EA

NTS

4

2D

/9

SURVEY

—DA

TA

—PARAMETERS —

SURVEYED

BY

—REPORT BY

—

DATE

—

PROJECT

—SC

ALE

—

VLF

E

M-1

6V

LF

CO

NTO

UR

SFR

ASER

N

UM

ER

ICA

L FI

LTER

ING

TE

CH

NIQ

UE

CO

NTO

UR

IN

TER

VA

L 5

units

GEO

TEST

CO

.G

EOTE

ST

CORP

ORA

TIO

N JU

LY

1984

6

0-1

30

h

2500

MA

P —

20 1 —

——

——

1 ——

——

— t

0

——

——

——

1 ——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

t ——

—tO

O

200

——

——

——

1 ——

——

——

— 1 —

——

——

——

1 ——

——

——

— | —

——

——

——

t—

BOO

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

— F

EE

T

P.7

3B

3

PIC

PI 7

6756

—

0 +

00

BA

SELI

NE

——

l *

00

S

—

2 4-

00 S

—

3 +

00

S

—

4 +

00

S

00

S

— 6

-l-

00 S

—

70

0 S

——

8

+ 0

0 S

—

90

0 S

——

10+

00 S

——

II +

00

S

2+

00 S

o

o + o l -J

LU O oUJ o o + O

J l

UJ o

o + ro l -i

LJ

o

oUJ o o

UJ o

oUJ o

oUJ o o + 00 l

UJ o o O) l -l

UJ o

o

NO

TEH

OR

IZO

NTA

L CO

NTRO

L W

AS

BY

CO

MPA

SS,

HIP

-CH

AIN

AN

D FL

AGG

ING

, W

ITH

TI

E

IN

TO

TIE

LI

NES

AN

D C

LAIM

PO

STS

CO

ND

UC

TOR

AX

IS

42D

09N

EW

18

2.7

383

PIC

NiC

OLL

EAN

NEX

( 17

C

LAIM

S)

UJ I-

t-

o

o

LOC

ATIO

N

MAP

l" =

1/2

mile

GOLD

EN

RULE

RES

OUR

CES

LTD

NICO

LLE

AN

NEX

CL

AIM

S HE

MLO

AR

EA

NTS

42

D/9

SURVEY

—DATA

—

PARAMETERS —

SURVEYED BY

—

REPORT BY —

DATE

—

PROJECT

SCALE

VLF

EM

-16

VLF

PR

OFI

LES

IN

PHAS

E (l

) —

——

lc

m*2

00

QUA

DRAT

URE

(Q) —

— l

cmG

EOTE

ST

CO.

GEO

TEST

CO

RPO

RATI

ON

JULY

19

84

60-

130

1 = 25

00

o xo x

240

-7 /

PI 7

675

—

0 +

00

BA

SE

LIN

E

l -(

-00

S

—

2 4-

00

S

3 +

00

S

—

4+

00 S

5 +

00 S

— 6

-l-

00

S

—

7 4-

00

S

8 -f-

00 S

—

9 H-

00

S

10 +

00

S

+ C

C S

—

12 4

- C

C S

o o + o f

UJ o o -t- — 1

UJ O o -t- PJ 1

UJ o

o ro

UJ o o -t- I -J

LJ

O oLJ

O o

UJ O

O l -l

LJ

O

O -h 00

UJ

O o •f- O)

UJ o o -H o

NIC

OLL

EAN

NEX

{ 17

C

LAIM

S)

UJ H

I-

O

O

LOC

ATI

ON

M

AP

l" =

1/2

mile

L K 6

e M O

M

or

S

fer

Zo

ne

Mor

eW

her

e.

otf

tcro

P

/s 0

0?

/'s

if

eu#S

0

6 f

Core

d,

0/0

*3

GO

LDEN

R

ULE

R

ESO

UR

CES

LT

D

NIC

OLL

E AN

NEX

C

LAIM

S H

EMLO

AR

EA

NTS

4

2D

/9

SURVEY

—DATA

—PARAMETERS —

SURVEYED BY —

REPORT BY

—

DATE

—PROJEC

T —

SCALE

—

/ef/

GEO

TEST

CO

.G

EO

TES

T C

OR

POR

ATIO

N

JULY

19

8460

- 13

0 P

2500

MA

P-4

IOO

2OO

H—————————(-

2.7

383

PIC

25

0