rpt on additional heavy mineral sampling on the kap …
TRANSCRIPT
42G02NW2005 2.20389 ECCLESTONE 010
RECEIVEDJUN 1 5 2000
GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICF
N.T.S. 42G
REPORT ON ADDITIONAL HEAVY MINERAL SAMPLINGON THE KAP PROPERTY
ECCLESTONE TOWNSHIP, KAPUSKASING, ONTARIO GEMCAL PROSPECTING SYNDICATE
FOR: GEMCAL PROSPECTING SYNDICATE. c/o G. SILVERMAN 75 ACTON AVE. NORTH YORK, ONTARIO M3H 4H2
BY: R.J. DILLMAN8901REILYDRIVEMOUNT BRYDGES, ONTARIONOL l WO(519)264-9278
JUNE 4, 2000
PROVINCIAL
R E'C'E i v E DJUN 1 5 'M)0o -* 3 o '^r^ ^ p M
8'l'9llOlliil2lll2l3l4l9K
N.T.S. 42G
REPORT ON ADDITIONAL HEAVY MINERAL SAMPLINGON THE KAP PROPERTY
ECCLESTONE TOWNSHIP, KAPUSKASING, ONTARIO GEMCAL PROSPECTING SYNDICATE
FOR: GEMCAL PROSPECTING SYNDICATE. c/o G. SILVERMAN 75 ACTON AVE. NORTH YORK, ONTARIO M3H 4H2
BY: R.J. DILLMAN8901 REILY DRIVEMOUNT BRYDGES, ONTARIONOL l WO (519)264-9278
JUNE4' 2000 ! RECEIVED
JUN 1 5 2003
iEOSCiENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICE
REPORT ON ADDITIONAL HEAVY MINERAL SAMPLINGON THE KAP PROPERTY
ECCLESTONE TOWNSHIP, KAPUSKASING, ONTARIO GEMCAL PROSPECTING SYNDICATE
This report summarizes additional heavy mineral sampling for kimberlite indicator minerals
in stream gravels and glacial till on the Kap Property located in Ecclestone Township, 40
kilometres southwest of Kapuskasing, Ontario. The property is owned by Gemcal Prospecting
Syndicate and held in trust by George Silverman of Toronto, Ontario. The program is a follow-up
to an initial heavy mineral program which investigated kimberlite indicator minerals discovered in
1997 by the Ontario Geological Survey (O.G.S.). Gemcal's program focused on detail sampling
to correlate areas of kimberlite mineral anomalies with low-altitude (45 m) aeromagnetic and
ground magnetic anomalies detected by previous surveys. During this program 47 heavy minerals
samples were collected, adding to a total of 98 heavy mineral samples from the property.
Gemcal's Kap Property consists of 33 contiguous unpatented mining claims covering
6,432 hectares. The property is situated on the northwest boundary of the region covered by the
1998 O.G.S. heavy mineral survey. With respect to previous glaciations, the Kap Property is
situated 'up-ice' from the kimberlite indicator minerals discovered by the O.G.S. survey.
The initial heavy mineral survey conducted by Gemcal on the Kap Property located five
areas where kimberlite indicator minerals occur in glacial tills and stream sediments. The minerals
include: chromite, picroilmenite, pyrope garnet and chrome diopside. Microprobe analyses on the
various minerals confirmed the minerals are kimberlitic. Some of the analyses coincide with
minerals from diamond-bearing kimberlite indicating suggesting diamonds could be present in the
source.
This program resulted in the detection of good concentrations of kimberlite minerals (15
grains/sample) close to six ground magnetic anomalies resembling kimberlite pipes, two dyke-like
magnetic features and the discovery of a new kimberlite mineral anomaly close to several
aeromagnetic anomalies on the property.
The success of Gemcal's heavy mineral sampling programs and geophysical surveys are
very encouraging and provided strong evidence suggesting diamond-bearing kimberlite occurs on
the Kap Property. Additional heavy mineral sampling, ground magnetometer surveys, trenching,
overburden and diamond drilling are recommended.
42G02NW2005 2.20389 ECCLESTONE 010C
INDEX
SUMMARY i
I. INTRODUCTION
LOCATION AND ACCESS lMINING CLAIM LOGISTICS AND PROPERTY OWNERSHIP lDATES AND PERSONAL lTOPOGRAPHY AND LAND-USE l
II. REGIONAL GEOLOGY
BEDROCK GEOLOGY 6QUATERNARY GEOLOGY 8PREVIOUS WORK 10
HI. SURVEY METHODS AND RESULTS
METHODS 10MINERALS FOUND IN HEAVY MINERAL CONCENTRATES 12
CHROME-BEARING CLINOPYROXENE 12GARNET 13CHROMITE 14PICROILMENITE 14ACCESSORY MINERALS 15ECLOGITE GARNET 17
IV. RESULTS OF SURVEYA GRID 15B GRID 19C GRID 19D GRID 22E GRID 25NEW KIMBERLITE MINERAL ANOMALY 25KIMBERLITE MINERALS AND "KEATING FILTER" ANOMALIES 28
V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 29
REFERENCES 30
AUTHOR'S CERTIFICATE 31
FIGURES
1. REGIONAL LOCATION MAP 22. PROPERTY LOCATION 33. CLAIM MAP 44. GEOLOGY OF KAP PROPERTY 75. QUATERNARY GEOLOGY 96. KIMBERLITE MINERAL PLOTS 177. A GRID: GROUND MAGNETICS AND KIM LOCATIONS 188. B GRID: GROUND MAGNETICS AND KIM LOCATIONS 209. C GRID: GROUND MAGNETICS AND KIM LOCATIONS 2110. D GRID: GROUND MAGNETICS AND KIM LOCATIONS 2311. CHROME CPX ANOMALY: D GRID 2412. E GRID: GROUND MAGNETICS AND KIM LOCATIONS 2613. NEW KIMBERLITE MINERAL ANOMALY 27
INDEX CON'TSCHEDULE 1. CLAIM LOGISTICS 5
TABLE I. PROCESS TO ACHIEVE HEAVY MINERAL CONCENTRATEAND KIMBERLITE INDICATOR MINERAL IDENTIFICATION 11
TABLE 2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS 16
APPENDIX
I. RESULTS OF KIMBERLITE INDICATOR PICKINGH. MICROPROBE RESULTS OF SELECTED GRAINSIII. SAMPLE LOCATION MAP AND RESULTS
REPORT ON ADDITIONAL HEAVY MINERAL SAMPLINGON THE KAP PROPERTY
ECCLESTONE TOWNSHIP, KAPUSKASING, ONTARIO GEMCAL PROSPECTING SYNDICATE
I. INTRODUCTION
LOCATION AND ACCESS
The Kap Property is located in Ontario (Figure 1), situated in Ecclestone Township, 40 kilometres southwest of the town of Kapuskasing (Figure 2). The property is seasonally accessible by two-wheel drive vehicle. Following the Cargill Road 35 kilometres southwest of Kapuskasing, the property can be reached via two new logging roads constructed west from the Cargill Road. The logging roads cross the east and southeast corner of the property 10 kilometres west of the Cargill Road.
The property is situated on the N.T.S. sheet: 42G; Kapuskasing.
MINING CLAIM LOGISTICS AND PROPERTY OWNERSHIP
The Kap Property consists of 33 contiguous unpatented mining claims located in Ecclestone Township (Figure 3). Schedule l summarizes claim logistics. The claims are owned by Gemcal Prospecting Syndicate and currently held in trust by George Silverman of 75 Acton Road, in North York, Ontario.
DATES AND PERSONAL
Field work for the survey was completed during times between June 18,1999 to July 4, 1999 and September 27,1999 to October 4, 1999. A total 18 days were devoted to sample collection.
The program is supervised by: Robert J. Dillman of Mount Brydges, Ontario and has been assisted by: Jim Chard of Cordova Mines, Ontario and Graeme Scott of Toronto, Ontario.
TOPOGRAPHY AND LAND-USE
Typically, the Kap Property is defined by broad, flat terrain. Relief is low with local variations of 10 to 20 metres. The most dominate topographic feature on the property is a northeast trending ridge of outcrop crossing the west boundary of the property and forming part of the east slope of the Opasatika River valley.
The central area of the property is cut by Ecclestone Creek. The creek drains northward and has poor drainage due to damming by beaver dams.
Page-l-
Late Michigan
PROPERTY LOCATIONGEMCAL PROSPECTING SYNDICATE
KAPUSKASING REGION, ONTARIO
O 100 200 300 400km
n
10 Km
FIGURE 2.LOCATION OF KAP PROPERTY ECCLESTONE TWP., ONTARIO
GEMCAL PROSPECTING SYNDICATEN.T.S. 42G
OPAZATIKA TWPBOURINOT TWP
FIGURE 3.CLAIM MAP
KAP PROPERTY
ECCLESTONE TWP., ONTARIO GEMCAL PROSPECTING SYNDICATE
CLAIM No.122298912229901222991122299212229931231001123104812310491231221123122212312231231225123122612312271231228123123012312311231232123123312312291231234123123512312361237531123753212375331237534123753512375361237537123753812375391239236
No. OF UNITS161616161616816161616161616816161616116881616281684886413
HECTARES25625625625625625612825625625625625625625612825625625625616
256128128256256321282561286412812896
6,608
SCHEDULE 1.CLAIM LOGISTICS
KAP PROPERTY, ECCLESTONE TWP. ONTARIO GEMCAL PROSPECTING SYNDICATE
DATE OF RECORDING June 18,1998 June 18, 1998 June 18, 1998 June 18,1998 June 18, 1998 June 18, 1998 June 18, 1998 September 9,1998 September 9,1998 September 9,1998 September 9,1998 September 9, 1998 September 9, 1998 September 9, 1998 September 9, 1998 September 9,1998 September 9,1998 September 9, 1998 September 9, 1998 October 22,1998 October 22, 1998 October 22,1998 October 22,1998 March31, 1999 March 31, 1999 March31,1999 March31, 1999 March 31, 1999 March 31, 1999 March 31, 1999 March 31, 1999 March 31,1999 March 17, 2000
Page -5-
Ridges and lineaments on the property are orientated northeast and northwest. Both directions coincide with large, regional geological fault structures which cut northeast through the area or with the general trend of underlying geological rock units.
Outcrop exposure across the property is poor and mostly restricted to areas of higher relief. The greatest extent of outcrops are found in the vicinity of the ridge located along the western boundary of the property. The ridge of outcrop trends northeast into the central area of the property. Eastern areas of the property are swampy and outcrops are rare.
Most areas of the property have been extensively logged. The operations have left isolated stands of mature poplar and buffer zones of spruce, jack-pine, birch and poplar along most of the creeks and lakes on the property. Forested areas extend over the southwest side of the property.
II. REGIONAL GEOLOGY
BEDROCK GEOLOGY
The Kap Property is situated within a region underlain by four Archean bedrock domains (Figure 4). The domains include:
1.) a metavolcanic suite consisting of amphibolite, schists and amphibole-pyroxene- plagioclase gneiss;
2.) a metasedimentary suite consisting of greywacke, arkose, and iron formation;3.) a migmatite-metasedimentary-metavolcanic complex consisting of supra crustal,
metavolcanic and minor metasedimentary rocks, and mafic and granite gneiss;4.) felsic intrusive suite consisting of massive granite, foliated granite and granite
pegmatite.
The north and west areas of the property are underlain by east-west striking metasedimentary schists and mafic metavolacinic flows belong to the Quetico Subprovince. South and east areas of the property are underlain by hornblende-quartz-feldspar gneiss and granite bodies belonging to the Wawa Subprovince.
The sequence has been intruded by northwest trending Archean diabase dykes and northeast trending Proterozoic diabase dykes.
The property lies within the LePage Fault System. This system is part of the western margin of the Kapuskasing Structural Zone (KSZ) and consists of a series of parallel northeast trending fault structures which include the Rufus Lake Fault and Opasatika Lake Fault. Both faults cross the property and are easily identifiable on the regional government airborne magnetic survey sheets. The Rufus Lake Fault can be traced through the Cargill Carbonatite complex, located 15 km northeast of the property.
Page-6-
T~"A ' "
Proterozoic31 e Diabase Dikes24 Carbonatite 21 a Diabase Dikes 17a Diabase Dikes Archean 15 Granodiorite to granite13 Granite11 Tonalite to granodiorite8 Migmatized
Supracrustral Rocks 7a Metasedimentary
migmatites and paragneisses 6 Felsic to intermediate rocks
. 5 Mafic to intermediatemetavolcanic rocks
Granulite Facies H10 Km
FIGURE 4.GEOLOGY
KAP PROJECT, KAPUSKASING, ONTARIO GEMCAL PROSPECTING SYNDICATE
Faults associated with the LePage Fault System were active through the late Proterozoic. The structures exhibit both strike-slip and vertical displacement.
Aeromagnetic data suggests faulting has occurred along northwest orientated fractures. In the field, these structure are evident by a series of northwest orientated lineaments. The age of these structures is uncertain since some appear to be older and some are younger than northeast orientated faults associated with the KSZ.
Throughout the Archean and into the late Proterozoic, the region has been intruded by swarms of diabase dykes. The orientations of the dykes coincide with the major fault zones. Diabase is easily recognizable on the government aeromagnetic sheets. Some of the dykes trending northwest appear to cross both the northeast orientated faults and some diabase dykes suggesting that a young dyke phase has occurred in this direction.
QUATERNARY GEOLOGY
Surficial deposits of glacial till cover most areas of the property (Figure 5). Till was deposited during several pulses of the Wisconsinan glaciation. Striae found in the region suggest three ice advances have occurred, the youngest advance was orientated 1200 and two older sets orientated 1600 and 2200 (Boissoneau, 1968). On the Kap Property, a striae was recorded at an orientation of 1550 .
The different striae correspond to pulses of an ice sheet moving in a general north to south direction changed towards the southeast. The youngest striae, 1200, reflects an ice pulse moving northwest to southeast and deposited the Cochrane till. During the initial Matheson advance, ice moved across the property from north northeast to south southwest depositing the Monteith flow till. As ice shifted towards the southeast during the Cochrane readvance, the ice overrode, reworked and capped the older till deposits.
Glacial deposits on the property are comprised of clayish boulder till. The material consists of approximately 95 to lOO'Mi fine-clay matrix material and particles ranging from grit to boulder- sized rocks. Rock fragments generally consist of: limestone, granite, gneiss, diabase, garnet-rich gneiss, metasedimentary schists and fine-grained metavolcanic fragments. There is a high carbonatite contented associated with the Cochrane Till.
A small gravel pit on the north side of the logging road on 1231226 is the only exposure of Matheson till found on the property. Pyroxene-rich rock fragments found in the pit are believed to have been transported from the area of the Cargill carbonatite indicating an ice sheet moving towards the southwest. The till occurs on the lee side of a diabase dyke which protected the till from the Cochrane readvance.
An esker stretches intermittently for several kilometres in a north to northwest direction through the central area of the property. The esker follows Ecclestone Creek in the north area of the property. A similarly orientated esker was found on the west boundary of the property. A northeast trending esker is partially preserved at the base of the northeast trending outcrop located in the central area of the property.
Page-8-
5 overburden
swamp
3) area of outcrop S Cochrane Till
2 Cochrane Till
1 Matheson Till
Aesker
V^, Xi glacial striation
gravel pit
kimberlite minerals
2 Km
FIGURE 5. QUATERNARY GEOLOGY
KAR PROPERTYECCLESTONE TWP., ONTARIO
GEMCAL PROSPECTING SYNDICATE
Much of the property is overlain by swamp and flat, boggy terrain. Recent deposits forming in these environments include peat and silt deposits. Local sand and gravel deposits are continuously developing along active streams on the property.
PREVIOUS WORK
Diamond exploration has not been documented in this region until the release of results obtained in 1997 of a heavy mineral survey preformed by the Ontario Geological Survey over a section of the Kapuskasing Structural Zone, south of Kapuskasing, Ontario. Sporadic diamond exploration occurred through the mid-60's at Coral Rapids, north of Kapuskasing and more recently, in the Wawa region where four kimberlite and several alluvial diamonds have now been discovered.
In 1987, some areas of the Kap Property were covered by airborne magnetic and electromagnetic surveys preformed on behalf of Golden Trio Resources Limited. The surveys were followed by geological work.
The Kap Property was bordered to the south by Canabrava Diamond Corporation but these claims have elapsed. Berland Resources also held claims in Ecclestone Township but these have elapsed.
Within the region, Agrium Resources is mining apatite from the Cargill Carbonatite located in Cargill Township. The operation produces phosphate to be used as a fertilizer.
In the fall of 1999 a claim was staked adjoining to the northeast corner of the Kap Property. The claim is owned by unknown parties and ties onto patented claims covering the Cargill carbonatite.
III. SURVEY METHODS. RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION
METHODS
Forty seven gravel samples were collected on the property during this program. Most of these were taken in creeks since there are very low quantities of heavy minerals in till on the property. A total of 98 samples have now been collected on the property.
N.T.S. locations for all samples on the Kap Property are included with the heavy mineral descriptions appended to this report. Sample locations and results have been plotted on l :20,000 scale maps included with this report.
Heavy minerals contained in the gravel samples were extracted by Robert Dillman in Mount Brydges, Ontario. The processes used to extract the heavy mineral grains are summarized in Table 1. Visual examination of the heavy mineral concentrates and kimberlite indicator mineral selection was also preformed by R. Dillman.
Page-lO-
— TABLE 1. —PROCESS TO ACHIEVE
HEAVY MINERAL CONCENTRATE ANDKIMBERLITE INDICATOR MINERAL IDENTIFICATION
SAMPLE COLLECTION
SIEVE
l O kg gravel -5.0 nrni
SEEVJ^I5.0 mm heavy
mineral concentrate
SIEVE microscope examination
j 23 minera
LO mm heavy mineral concentrate
microscope examination +0.5 mm heavy mineral concentrate
-0.5 mm heavy mineral concentrate
remove magnetic minerals
heavy mineral concentrationusing Lithium Metatungstate
sp.g. 3.0d
lite minerals discarded
microscope examination
remove magnetic minerals
heavy mineral concentration using Lithium Metatungstate
sp.g. 3.0
lite minerals discarded
microscope examination
microprobe analysis of "KIM's"
Gravel samples taken from till or stream beds consisted of collecting 7 to 15 kg of gravel material which had been sieved through a 5 mm screen. Each sample was again screened into the fractions of: +2.0 mm, +1.0 mm and -l .0 mm size. Heavy minerals grains contained in the three largest fractions were extracted in the field using bowl-shaped screens called Brazilian Bata. The -1.0 mm fractions were sorted in the laboratory into two fractions using a No. 20 screen (0.5 mm). The heavy minerals contained in the -1.0 to 0.5 mm and in the -0.5 mm fractions were concentrated from the lighter minerals using a 'Mansker' cable-jig. Ferromagnetic minerals contained in the heavy mineral concentrates produced by the jig were removed using a magnetic tray. Refinement of the non-ferromagnetic fractions is accomplished using a high density liquid called lithium metatungstate. This liquid concentrates the minerals having a specific gravity of 3.0 or higher. Most kimberlite indicator minerals have a specific gravity of+3.0. The end-product of heavy minerals is visually searched for kimberlite indicator minerals under 20x magnification using a binocular microscope.
Mineral grains suspected of being kimberlitic were analyzed using an electron microprobe. The microprobe determines the exact chemistry of a mineral grain by measuring the reaction of an electron beam when transmitted onto the surface of a mineral grain. Grains suspected of being kimberlite indicator minerals were sent to R.L. Barnett Geological Services located in Lambeth, Ontario. The microprobe is operated by Robert Barnett who has 30 years experience in microprobe operation and kimberlite indicator mineral analyses. His laboratory uses a 733 JEOL electron microprobe for the grain analyses. Results of the microprobe analyses are included with this report.
MINERALS FOUND IN HEAVY MINERAL CONCENTRATES
Heavy mineral concentrates collected on the property typically contain grains of: amphibole, clinopyroxene, garnet, ilmenite and pyrite. Most of the minerals come from local sources such as: diabase, metasedimentary rock and mafic metavolcanic rock. Mineral grains known as 'kimberlite indicator minerals' are present in low quantities (1-12 grains per sample) in some of the concentrates collected on the property. The minerals consist of: pyrope garnet, chrome diopside, picroilmenite and chromite. Kimberlite minerals are visually separated from heavy mineral concentrates and verified by an electron microprobe.
Chrome-bearing Clinopyroxene
Green clinopyroxene grains are a common constituent in heavy mineral concentrates on the property. There are several types of igneous derived chrome-clinopyroxene which can be distinguished by visual appearance and geochemical variations determined by microprobe analyses.
Most of the clinopyroxene grains are believed to be derived from the mafic metavolcanic units belonging to the greenstone sequence striking through the central regions of the property. Typically, these clinopyroxene grains are dull-green in color. Microprobe analyses indicates the composition to be augite with little to no chrome.
Page-12-
Another type of clinopyroxene with appreciable increases in chrome and 'brighter' green color are found in abundance at several localities on the property. Previous heavy mineral sampling located hundreds of large bright clinopyroxene grains in: (1.) Graveyard Creek in the southeast corner of the property (D Grid); (2.) crumbly rock fragments of clinopyroxene in the gravel pit exposing Matheson Till north of the logging road on claim 1231226; (3.) north of the logging road on E Grid, in the small stream crossing claims 1231235 and 1237531; (4.) during this survey, in Gosselin Creek just east of claim 1237531. The distribution of the clinopyroxene appears to follow the Opasatika Lake Fault and areas to the southeast.
The chrome-bearing clinopyroxene grains are easily recognizable as glassy bright-green grains. Occasionally, black rims are preserved on larger grains and fragments suggesting some zoning. Microprobe analyses indicates the core composition as mostly diopside having G.5-1.2% weight chrome. The chemistry weakly overlaps with some documented compositions of clinopyroxene from kimberlite, however, the low-sodium content suggests there may be a lamprophyre or ultramafic association and possibly a relationship to the emplacement of the Cargill carbonatite. It should be noted that traces of kimberlitic chromite, picroilmenite and garnet have been found at several locations with this type of diopside.
Rare kimberlitic chrome diopside has been found in two areas on the property: (1.) in Ecclestone Creek crossing B Grid and in till north of B Grid; (2.) with low-sodium chrome diopside in Graveyard Creek crossing D Grid. Only a total of 4 grains have been found signifying the rarity of this mineral. Kimberlitic chrome diopside is translucent and turquoise-green in color making it easily distinguishable from other clinopyroxene. Microprobe analyses indicates a diopside composition with high chrome C5* I'M)) and a chrome-sodium ratio of roughly l to 1. In terms of diamond prospecting this type of diopside is both visually and geochemically akin to chrome diopside used as a kimberlite indicator mineral.
Calcium depleted, high chrome clinopyroxene is sometimes used an indicator of diamond since the composition is frequently found in clinopyroxene inclusions in diamond. On the property, calcium-depleted diopside was found the with strong concentrations of chrome diopside grains on D Grid. The kimberlitic diopside grains found in the central area of the property also exhibit a depletion in calcium.
Garnet
Garnet grains form a significant portion of heavy mineral concentrates from the property. Typically, the garnets are transparent pink, orange, red and yellow in color. Many contain black inclusions. Most are angular fragments and euhedral shaped crystals. Microprobe analyses indicates the majority of the garnet population have a spessartine-almandine composition. The garnets are mostly the product of metamorphism of sedimentary rock units on the property. Many cobbles of garnet-bearing gneiss were observed in till and garnets were noted in small metasedimentary outcrops close to the granite gneiss contact.
Page-l3-
Red and orange pellet shaped garnets were observed in varying quantities in most heavy mineral concentrates from the property. Microprobe analyses on a limited number of the pellet shape grains indicates a number of the garnets are composed of almandine to pyrope-almandine solid solution, many with significant calcium. Compositions of this type have been found in diatreme occurrences and eclogite in some kimberlite. The garnets could also be associate with metamorphic eclogite terrains thus restraining use as a kimberlite indicator mineral. It is important to note that the frequency of pellet shaped garnets appears to increase in the presence of kimberlite indicator minerals. This was most evident in samples from the A Grid.
A total of eight purple and lilac colored pyrope garnets have been found on the property. Microprobe analyses indicates the pyrope garnets are G9 composition, having similar compositions to kimberlitic pyrope garnet. Pyrope garnets are usually found with other kimberlite indicator minerals in a frequency of 1-2 grains per anomalous sample. Most of the pyrope found on the property range between 0.5-1.0 mm and are consist of fragments of larger grains. Only two preserved pellets have been found. Both grains were found in an esker crossing the A and B Grids.
Chromite
Chromite is the most abundant kimberlite indicator mineral on the property although with certainty, there are other sources of chromite in the area. Microprobe analyses indicates most of the chromite has high chrome and magnesium, characteristic of kimberlitic chromite. A significant number of the chromite population have increased titanium and several chromite fall within the field unique to kimberlite and lamproite. Chromite of this type has been found on the A Grid, D Grid and southeast of the B Grid.
Variations in the chemistry of chromite from different samples collected on the E Grid suggest multiple sources occur in the vicinity of the grid. Chromite detected in samples from the A Grid have consist chemistries between chromite from different sample sites suggesting a common source for the grains.
Chromite grains on the property are black and can be pellet shaped to fragments with conchoidal surfaces or octahedral shaped crystals. Preserved crystals and pellets suggest little migration from source. The best preserved grain shapes of chromite were observed in samples from the A Grid, C Grid, D Grid and E Grid.
Picroilmenite
Picroilmenite has only been found on the E Grid and to a lesser extent on the A Grid although additional probe work on the finest heavy mineral concentrate residues may prove the mineral to occur elsewhere. Picroilmenite in both areas ranges from low chrome-magnesium to high chrome-magnesium compositions, the latter is considered as a kimberlite indicator mineral. Microprobe analyses of ilmenite with high chrome-magnesium compositions in different samples
Page -14-
collected on the E Grid form several fields indicating multiple sources for the grains could be present.
Picroilmenite grains found the property are usually pellet shaped or fragments of larger grains. Several fragments from the E Grid have exceeded l .0 mm in size. Ilmenite can be distinguished from chromite by its metallic appearance and conchoidal fracture.
Accessory Minerals
Some heavy mineral concentrates which contain kimberlite minerals also contain minerals which could also be associated with kimberlite. These include: perovskite, Nb-rutile, Ca-Ti oxides and zircon. Generally, the frequency of these grains ranges less than l grain per anomalous sample and is to low to have any significant meaning.
IV. RESULTS OF THE SURVEY
The 1999-2000 heavy mineral sampling program on the property was geared towards equating ground and aeromagnetic anomalies with kimberlite minerals detected by previous heavy mineral sampling programs. During the program, 47 heavy mineral samples were collected in the vicinity to ground magnetic features and several aeromagnetic targets believed to be sources of the kimberlite minerals. A total of 93 heavy mineral samples have been collected from the property. The samples consisted of mostly stream gravel and some glacial till. Five separate areas were covered by ground geophysical surveys and heavy mineral sampling.
Results are summarized in Table 2. Microprobe results and descriptions heavy mineral concentrations are appended to this report. The surveys define at least five ground magnetic features which could be kimberlite pipes and several linear dyke-like features all of which are situated close to kimberlite mineral anomalies. Heavy mineral sampling on the west side of the property during the recent program led to the detection of a new kimberlite mineral anomaly situated close to several positive and negative aeromagnetic features.
A Grid
Ground magnetometer surveys have located three circular to lens-shaped features averaging 150 metres in diameter and 200-1500 nanoteslas. The magnetic anomalies occur close to the mafic metavolcanic-metasedimentary contact and the Rufus Lake Fault where aeromagnetic data suggests that it is crossed by a northwest trending structure.
Heavy mineral sampling has identified traces of chromite, picroilmenite, chrome diopside and pyrope in samples which tested two of the magnetic features. Heavy mineral samples were collected from stream gravels and periodically along an esker which crosses between the three ground magnetic features.
Page-l 5-
TABLE 2.SAMPLES WITH KIMBERLITE MINERALS KAP PROPERTY, ECCLESTONE TWP. ONTARIO GEMCAL PROSPECTING SYNDICATE
SAMPLENo.
A-l
A-2
A-3
A-10
KAP
CPX-3
CPX-4
GC-2
GC-7
GC-9
GC-13
GC-19
AL-2
AL-3
TOTAL No. KIM's
2
4
5
1
4
~
-
5
2
12
3
--
o
1
PYROPE GARNET
-
-
~
1
1
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
9
1
CHROMITE
1
3
2
~
3
~
~
5
~
6
3
-
7
f
PICRO- ILMENITE
1
-
3
—
~
--
-
-
2
5
~
~
f
f
CHROME DIOPSIDE
—
1
-
~
7
~
~
-
~
1
-
-
7
1
SUSPECTED KIM'S
(not probed)
5
10
--
5
~
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
7
7
REGIONAL DIOPSIDE
(low Na)
—
-
—
—
+1000
+1000
+1000
-
~
—
~
+100
~
~
GRID
A
A
A
A
D
D
D
E
E
E
E
POSSIBLE MAGNETIC
SOURCE
A-l, A-2
A-2
A-2
A-l. A-2
D-l (dyke)
D-l (dyke)
D-l (dyke)
E-l
E-l
E-l
E-l
aeromagnetic low
aeromagnetic low
- not observed in concentrate? presently submitted for probe analyses
KIMBERLITE INDICATOR MINERAL CHEMISTRIES: KAP PROJECT
PROPERTY CHROMITE PICRODLMENITE PYROPE GARNET CHROME DIOPSIDE
Kap Property "A" Anomaly
PLOT-OF Cr.Cyw) -1* VS. -fiDjwi iq
no,
Cr-O,
3Cr^Q,
tt
MgO
Pi^rr OF C--,0,i~i w.j vs. Tio^vn y.,
Kap Property "C" Anomaly Cr.Oj
j l
Kap Property "D" Anomaly Cr-Oj 10C
no,
Kap Property "E" Anomaly
Cr3 O,, ^ Cr,0, c-io. ::
MgO CaO
l \17W 16W 15W 14W 13W 12W HW 10W 9W 8W 7W 6W 5W 4W 3W 2W 1W O
6N
2N
2S
Kimberlite Indicator Minerals
A .^ **
r,pyrope chrome diopside
chromite pteroilmenite
t Barren Sample
Suspected Chromite Picroilmenite
Esker
200 metres
ACRIDGROUND MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
TOTAL MAGNETICSGEMCAL PROSPECTING SYNDICATE
KA P PROPERTY ECCLESTONE TWP, ONTARIO____
Samples collected along a creek which tested the A-2 magnetic target returned chromite, picroilmenite, chrome diopside and a single perovskite grain. The best concentration of kimberlite minerals was found in sample A-3 which was taken in a section of the creek located 100 metres down-ice from the target. Microprobe analyses indicates the chemistry of the grains are within kimberlitic trends. The sample also contained good concentrations of pellet shaped red-orange Ca-Mg almandine garnets which appear to be unique to garnets found in other samples from the creek and abundant augite. A G9 pyrope garnet was found a sample collected from the esker between the A-1 and A-2 ground magnetic targets.
A ground check of each of the magnetic anomalies failed to identify the targets due to overburden. A sample collected in a small creek draining the A-2 target contained 7 grains suspected of being chromite and picroilmenite. Currently, these have been submitted for microprobe analyses.
B Grid
The magnetic survey detected a suspicious magnetic target on the west side of the grid. The target is covered by overburden and is situated within gneissic rocks close to the metasedimentary contact. Aeromagnetic data suggests the presence of northeast trending faults associated with the Rufus Lake and Opasatika Lake Faults. The ground magnetic anomaly appears to be on a crosscutting northwest striking fault.
Only one heavy mineral sample could be collected close to the magnetic feature due to the low flat topography of the west side of B Grid. The origin of the sample material is questionable and is believed to consist of post-glacial lacustrine sediments which were collected approximately 40 meters up-ice from the target. The sample contained eight grains which could be chromite or picroilmenite and are currently awaiting microprobe analyses.
Samples were collected on the east half of B Grid in an effort to define a direction to the source of two pyrope garnets located during the initial sampling program on the property. The samples failed to contain any kimberlite minerals and it was determined the garnets may have come from an esker which was being eroded by the creek. The esker can be traced north to A Grid and kimberlite minerals have been detected at several sample sites along the way.
C Grid
A ground magnetometer survey detected an east-west trending dyke-like feature situated 35 metres north of sample locations containing low-sodium diopsides, chromite and a single pyrope-eclogite grain. The samples were collected on an outcrop of granite cut by a north striking diabase dyke. A sample was collected during the recent program on the west side of the outcrop approximately 10 metres west of the original sample sites and contained similar diopsides as the initial sampling indicate and several opaque grains suspected of being chromite. The grains have not been submitted for microprobe analyses.
Page-l9-
8N
6N
4N
2N
2S
4S
6S
8S
1231234
A Kimtwriit* Indicator A Suspected T Minerals V p&oin*
pyrbp. chrom*
chromitepicroilmenite /N K /S
B GRIDGROUND MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
TOTAL MAGNETICS -—-——GEMCAL PROSflCTlNG SYNDICATE
KAPPROTERTY ECCLESTONE TWP. ONTARIO
4 Kbnterttte indicator A Suspectot Chromite A T Minerals v w***"-"*-
r* 3. 1, -. 2 ^pyrop* "S chrom* dlopskt*
chromite picroiim*nite
denotes Cr cpx of questionable source kimberlitic or regional?
C GRIDGROUND MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
TOTAL MAGNETICSGEMCAL PROSPECTING SYNDICATE
KAP PROPERTY ECCLESTONE TWP. ONTARIO
D Grid
A ground magnetometer survey detected a weak response suspected of being a dyke which strikes east-west and crosses a creek up-stream from a group of heavy mineral sample sites containing hundred's of chrome diopside grains, traces of chromite and pyrope garnet. A VLF- electromagnetic survey detected a 'cross-over' coincident with the dyke-like magnetic feature. The geophysical feature was traced through overburden between granite outcrops for several hundred metres.
The chrome diopside were initially discovered by the Ontario Geological Survey during the 1997-98 heavy mineral sampling program. After numerous microprobe analyses, the O.G.S. suggested possible sources for the diopside ranging from a kimberlite or a peridotite source. Similar chrome diopside occur in many of the unique Monteregian intrusions in the Montreal region of Quebec and have been observed in heavy mineral concentrates collected from till situated within the New Liskeard kimberlite field.
Previous microprobe analyses during initial sampling on the property showed most of the diopside having high chrome ^Wo) and low sodium (0.8*^)) compositions. Some of the diopside were also determined to have the high chrome-sodium compositions (^\ 0A wt., 1:1 ratio) similar to kimberlitic chrome diopside. Several octahedrons of chromite, a G9 pyrope garnet and a sodium-rich clinopyroxene of possible kimberlitic origin were identified in a heavy mineral sample submitted to De Beers and later, verified by R.L. Barnett Geological. Chromite was found to contain high titanium, one grain with sufficient titanium and chrome unique to kimberlite and lamproite. Samples with diopside also contain large (+1.0 mm) euhedral red crystals of zircon.
Detailed sampling along the creek traced the chrome diopside approximately 15 metres up-stream from the discovery sample sites. This was easily accomplished in the field since many diopside grains exceed 2.0 mm in size and can be seen with an un-aided eye in the coarse-grained heavy mineral concentrates prepared on site. The diopside grains appear to terminate within 10-15 metres down-stream from the axis of the geophysical dyke-like anomaly. Heavy mineral concentrates collected up-stream from the dyke-like feature and between an outcrop of granite cut by the stream did not contain any chrome diopside even in the finest fractions (0.5-0.14 mm).
A till sample was collected 250 metres west along the strike of the dyke-like geophysical feature. The sample was taken on a granite outcrop situated 15 metres south of the suspected location of the dyke. The sample contained hundreds of clinopyroxene grains many of which appear to be in composite with amphibole. Visually, the clinopyroxene is dull-green and is not similar to the chrome diopside found to the west. The sample does contain large euhedral red crystals zircon although no opaques were observed. Grains have been submitted for microprobe analyses.
Page-22-
."-E -.+100.*-.
fO'SuapactMtJOMV
Ktmtwrtit* Indicator Minerals
A Suspected Ovwrnfe A V
pyrop* ) B*rr*n Sampt*
picroflmanite XX/X e**
"*^ denotes Gr cpx of questionable source kimbertltlc or regional?
D GRIDGROUND MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
TOTAL MAGNETICS—————GCMCAL PROSPECTING SYNDICATE
KAP PROPERTY ECCLESTONE TWP. ONTARIO
IS
ECCLESTONE TWP.
KAR 1 G9 pyrope, 3 chromite
\3W BOURINOT TWP.
Kimberlite Indicator Minerals and/or Cr diopside
No Kimberlite Indicator Minerals
Ground Magnetic Anomaly
note: questionable Cr cpx source kimberlitic or regional?
FIGURE 11.
CHROME DIOPSIDE AND MAGNETIC ANOMALY LOCATIONS;
AREA OF 'D' GRIDKAP PROPERTY, ECCLESTONE TWP., ONTARIO
- GEMCAL PROSPECTING SYNDICATE ~
E Grid
The 1997-98 O.G.S. heavy mineral survey identified 2 pyrope garnet and 6 picroilmenite in a stream crossing E Grid. Subsequent up-stream during the initial sampling program found chromite and picroilmenite up-stream from the O.G.S. site and in a different creek situated towards the northwest. A ground magnetometer survey over the area located a suspicious negative magnetic feature situated 300 metres northwest and up-ice from the location of the closest kimberlite minerals detected by the sampling. The E-1 target is part of a series of northeast trending negative magnetic features visible on the aeromagnetic survey.
Sampling during the recent heavy mineral survey focused on defining the extent of kimberlite minerals in the two creeks and if possible equate the minerals to the E-1 magnetic feature. Low topography of the area greatly restricted the heavy mineral sampling program and many areas of the grid were impossible to sample. It appears as a result of the program that the kimberlite minerals are restricted to the west half of the grid.
Additional sampling found chromite, picroilmenite and chrome diopside in creek samples collected up-stream from the initial anomalous sample sites. The kimberlite minerals were detected up to the point where swampy conditions made sampling impossible. No kimberlite minerals were found in samples collected downstream although concentrates contained many diopsides which appear similar to those diopside found on the D Grid. The diopside are not present in concentrates from the creek which contain kimberlite minerals and almost certainly implying that the minerals come from different sources.
Heavy mineral sampling on the northwest creek found the kimberlite minerals are restricted to a small section of the creek less than 200 metres long. Together, the anomalous sections of both creeks suggest the kimberlite minerals could be dispersed from the E-1 target.
A heavy mineral sample collected in Gosselin Creek in the northeast corner of the grid contained abundant coarse pyrite grains. Many of the grains were in composite with quartz. No assays have been preformed on the heavy mineral residue.
New Kimberlite Indicator Mineral Anomaly
Part of the recent heavy mineral program focused on testing suspected aeromagnetic targets located on the claim block and close to the margins. Two new kimberlite mineral anomalies were identified as a result of the program and each is situated close to aeromagnetic or ground magnetic features. As a result of the survey, eight claims were staked adjacent to the Kap Property and five separate four-claim blocks were staked north of the property covering ground magnetic features located by geophysical surveys preformed in the eighties.
This spring, eight claims added were added to the west side of the Kap Property to cover two negative aeromagnetic features. Heavy mineral samples of tills collected within 150-200
Page-25-
6W 10E
• KimtMrtrto Indicator A Suspect* ctvomto A aM*—— —. — —J— \/ ^tUlW^^nMn
ri^zklMlntralc
pyrop*chromt dlopvkto i x v
chromite x lipicroilm*nite
l/t)! H4* ^' "V W
Gl9ciltl ^.^
f***-
10N
es
8S
10S
E GRIDGROUND MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
TOTAL MAGNETICSGEMCAL PROSPECTING SYNDICATE
KAP PROPERTY ECCLESTONE TWP, ONTARIO
Aeromagnetic Data Senor Height: 100 metresLine Spacing: 100 metres LOCATION OF NEW sun™ nr.fnrm.rf h KIMBERLITE MINERAL ANOMALY H^erTeX^c, *AP PROPERTY, ECCLESTONE TWP.for Golden Trio Resources (1987) GEMCAL PROSPECTING SYNDICATE
metres directly down-ice from the aeromagnetic features tested positive for kimberlite minerals. The samples were collected on bedrock and consisted of basal till material. The minerals are presently awaiting analyses by a microprobe. They include grains suspected of being: pyrope garnet, chromite and picroilmenite. The aeromagnetic features are covered by swamp and situated close to the Rufus Lake Fault.
Kimberlite Minerals Associated With "Keating Filter" Aeromagnetic Anomalies
In the spring of 2000, as part of Operation Treasure Hunt, the O.G.S. released a survey reevaluating aeromagnetic data (sheets 80828 and 80830) covering the Kap Property, for magnetic signatures resembling kimberlite using the a process called the "Keating Filter". This process essentially evaluates the vertical component of magnetic features and compares the response to the response 'expected' over a kimberlite pipe. The definition of twelve magnetic features on the property resulted from the survey. As a result of ground checks almost half of the features can be attributed to diabase. Seven features remain unidentified and could represent potential kimberlite.
Keating filter anomalies of particular interest include:
1.) A-3 ground magnetic target (originally located by Golden Trio, 1989), 1231222.2.) North of the E Grid, 1237534.3.) Ground magnetic anomaly situated on the baseline at 7+50W, C Grid, 1231048/1237539.4.) Negative aeromagnetic feature in the southeast corner of 1222990.5.) Negative aeromagnetic feature in the northwest corner of 1231226.6.) Negative aeromagnetic anomaly on the property boundary south of D Grid, 1231227.7.) Negative aeromagnetic anomaly north of the end of the road, 1231231.
V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This heavy mineral survey has tested a number of ground magnetic and aeromagnetic anomalies for the presence of kimberlite indicator minerals. The survey has been successful and defined kimberlite minerals in the vicinity to: four 'pipe-like' ground magnetic features, two 'dyke-like' magnetic features and two negative aeromagnetic features. Seven additional aeromagnetic targets have been proposed as 'possible kimberlite' after reassessing aeromagnetic data using the Keating Filter.
Evidence continues to point at kimberlite occurring on the property. Based on these positive results further work is warranted to identify sources of the kimberlite minerals found in the streams and glacial till on the property. Some heavy mineral sampling is required to evaluate the 'Keating Filter' aeromagnetic kimberlite anomalies. Targets testing positive for kimberlite indicator minerals will need to be accurately located by a ground magnetometer. It may be possible to expand sections of the current grids to cover several of the Keating Filter aeromagnetic anomalies. To test potential kimberlite magnetic features using inexpensive
Page-28-
methods, overburden sampling using the 'mobile metal ionization' method (M.M.I.) is suggested since the procedure is geared towards evaluating potential kimberlite geophysical targets covered by overburden. It also may be possible to trench some magnetic features found on several of the grids due to the presence of outcrop noted on the margins of the magnetic features suggesting shallow overburden exists over the targets. An overburden drilling program is warranted focusing on testing only pipe-like magnetic features but may not be practical for testing dyke-targets. An overburden drill program should encounter weathered kimberlite rock at the surface of a kimberlite body thus providing conclusive evidence of kimberlite and justifying complete testing by a diamond drill program.
Expected costs to complete include:
Heavy Mineral Sampling20 samples, collection, processing, picking, analyses
Geophysical SurveysMag 8i VLF-EM, 4 grids, 80 km of surveying
M.M.I. Survey150 samples, collection, analyses
Trenchingmob-demob, 4-5 trenches, supervision
Overburden Drillingmob-demob, 500 m drilling, analyses, supervision
Diamond Drillingmob-demob, 750 m drilling, analyses, supervision
57,000
Respectfully submitted,
Robert J. Dillman Project Manager
June 4, 2000
B.Sc. Geologist
Page-29-
REFERENCES
Berger, B.R. 1986. Geology of the Hearst-Kapuskasing area, District of Cochrane: Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 5599, 88p.
Boissonneau, A.N. 1968. Glacial history of northeastern Ontario. I. The Cochrane-Hearst area; Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v.5, p.97-109.
Dillman, R.J. 1999. Results of Gemcal's heavy mineral survey for kimberlite indicator minerals on the Kap Property, Ecclestone Twp., Kapuskasing, Ontario: Assessment report.
Fipke, C.E. 1994. Significance of chromite, ilmenite, G5 Mg-almandine garnet, zircon and tourmaline in heavy mineral detection of diamond bearing lamproite; in Diamonds: Characterization, Genesis and Exploration, Proceedings of the Fifth International Kimberlite Conference, Araxa, Minas Gerais, Brazil, P.366.
Gurney, J.J. 1984. A correlation between garnets and diamonds in kimberlite; in KimberliteOccurrence and Origin: A Basis for Conceptual Models in Exploration, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, publiaction no.8, p.143-166.
Morris, T.F., Carbtree, D.C. and Averil, S.A. 1998. Kimberlite, base metal and gold exploration targets based upon heavy mineral data derived from surface materials, Kapuskasing, Northeastern Ontario; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 5967, 41 p.
Ontario Department of Mines 1963. Magladery Creek; Ontario Department of Mines, aeromagnetic series map 2238 G, scale 1:63,360.
Ontario Department of Mines 1967. Kapuskasing Sheet; Ontario Department of Mines, preliminary geological map P.398, scale l inch to 2 miles.
Ontario Department of Mines 1967. Hearst Sheet; Ontario Department of Mines, preliminary geological map P.397, scale l inch to 2 miles.
Ontario Geological Survey 1991. Bedrock geology of Ontario, east-central sheet; Ontario Geological Survey, Map 2543, scale 1:1,000,000.
Ontario Geological Survey 1991. Quaternary geology of Ontario, east-central sheet; Ontario Geological Survey, Map 2555, scale 1:1,000,000.
Airbourne Magnetic Survey, 1987. Opasatika, Fergus, Rykert, Caithness Townships, Ontario. Golden Trio Resources, unpublished assessment report.
Airbourne Magnetic Survey, 1987. Ecclestone Twp., Ontario. H. Ferderber Geophysics Ltd. For Golden Trio Resources.
Ontario Geological Survey, 2000. Kimberlite Pipe Modelling From Magnetic Grids, ERLIS Data Set1038.
CERTIFICATE
I, ROBERT JAMES DILLMAN, do hereby certify as follows:
[l .] I am a Mining Exploration Geologist and that I reside and carry on business at 8901 Reily Drive, in the town of Mount Brydges, Ontario.
[2.] I am a Graduate of the University of Western Ontario, and hold a Bachelor of Science Degree and majored in Geology.
[3.] I have been practicing my profession as a Geologist since 1992.
[4.] I am a Licenced Prospector in Ontario and have been actively engaged as a Professional Prospector since 1978.
[5.] My report, dated June 4, 2000, titled: "REPORT ON ADDITIONAL HEAVYMINERAL SAMPLING ON THE KAP PROPERTY ECCLESTONE TOWNSHIP, KAPUSKASING, ONTARIO GEMCAL PROSPECTING SYNDICATE" is based on information collected by myself between June 18,1999 and June 4,2000. Any other information gathered from other sources has been cited in this report.
[6.] The information given in this report is as accurate as to the best of my knowledge and I have not stated false information for personal gain.
[7.] I authorize Gemcal Prospecting Syndicate to use this report or any part of, at their discretion.
[8.] I have no ownership or financial interest in the property.
[9.] I am a member of the Geological Association of Canada.
ROBERT JAMES DILLMAN, B.Sc. GEOLOGIST
Dated at Mount Brydges, Ontario This 4 th day of June, 2000
KIMBERLITE INDICATOR MINERALS MICROPROBE RESULTSKAP PROPERTY, ECCLESTONE TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO Page l of 12
Microprobe: R.L. Barnett GeologicalLambeth, Ontario
Petrology: Robert DillmanARJADEE PROSPECTING
Sample Number
A-l
A-2
A-3
A-4
Type
Stream Sediment
Stream Sediment
Stream Sediment
Stream Sediment
UTM and Grid Coord.
356620 m. E. 5457675 m. N.
GRID A8+OOW 0+20N
356725 m. E. 5457720 m. N.
GRID A7+50W 1+80N
356895 m. E. 5457780 m. N.
GRID A 4+80W2+25N
357030m. E. 5457915 m. N.
GRID A 4+60W2+75N
Claim Number
1231223
1231223
1231223
1231223
Grain Size
4-1.0mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
-H.Omm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
Pyrope Garnet
-----
------
------
---
not picked
-
-
Chrome Diopside
:*l 07oCr; O3
~
-
-
-
~
-
1
--
1
-
--
-
--
--
-
--
-
not picked
-
-
Chromite
-
1
-
1
5
1
2
--
3
10
1
1
--
2
-
-
-
not picked
-
6
Picro- ilmenite
—
1
--
1
5
-
-
--
--
10
-
3
--
3
-
--
-
not picked
-
6
Comments
-1 euhedral octahedral chromite, -1 pelletal Mg-il. -20 suspected Cr/il pellets -0.5 mm. -abundant pelletal Ca-Mg almandine.
-1 euhedral octahedral chromite, -abundant pelletal Ca-Mg almandine, -abundant augite.
—1 euhedral octahedral chromite, -abundant pelletal Ca-Mg almandine, -abundant augite.
-mostly chipped and broken opaques, -pelletal or-red Ca-Mg almandine, -abundant augite.
KIMBERLITE INDICATOR MINERALS MICROPROBE RESULTSKAP PROPERTY, ECCLESTONE TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO Page 2 of 12.
Microprobe: R.L. Barnett GeologicalLambeth, Ontario
Petrology: Robert DillmanARJADEE PROSPECTING
Sample Number
A-5
A-6
A-7
A-8
Type
Glacial Fluvial Esker
Stream Sediment
Stream Sediment
Glacial Fluvial Esker
UTM and Grid Coord.
357030m. E. 5457915m. N.
GRID A10+90W 0+20S
356515m. E.5457475 m. N.
GRID A 9+90W 1+20S
356350m. E. 5457860 m. N.
GRID A 11+30W 3+OON
356180m. E.5457775 m. N.
GRID A 12+80W 2+85N
Claim Number
1231223
1231223
1231223
1231223
Grain Size
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 ram
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
O.S - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
O.S - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 -0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
Pyrope Garnet
--
not picked
--
-
--
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
--
Chrome Diopside
>l%CriO3
-
--
not picked
-
-
--
--
--
--
-
-
--
--
--
-
--
--
--
-
--
Chromite
----
not picked
--
1
--
--
--
-
-
-
--
--
-
-
--
--
--
-
-
Picro- ilmenite
---
not picked
--
1
--
--
-
-
-
--
--
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
1
Comments
- 1 chipped pellet opaque. -1 chipped octahedral chromite.—trace augite.
-3 augite.
-good concentrate, -no KIM's.
- 1 broken pellet of ilmenite, shagreen surface.
KIMBERLITE INDICATOR MINERALS MICROPROBE RESULTSKAP PROPERTY, ECCLESTONE TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO Page 3 of 12.
Microprobe: R.L. Barnett GeologicalLambeth, Ontario
Petrology: Robert DillmanARJADEE PROSPECTING
Sample Number
A-9
A-10
B-l
B-2
Type
Glacial Fluvial Esker
Stream Sediment
Glacial Till/ Glacial Fluvial?
Stream Sediment
UTM and Grid Coord.
356000 m. E.5457975 m. N.
GRID A14+00 W 4+OON
356735 m. E. 5457735 m. N.
GRID A7+35W2+35N
356150m. E. 5455500 m. N.
GRIDS17+65 W 2+80N
357700 m. E. 5455500 m. N.
GRID B0+30W 0+80N
Claim Number
1231223
1231223
1231049
1231221
Grain Size
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
-1.0 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
Pyrope Garnet
-i
not picked
1
--
-
-
--
--
--
-
-
--
--
--
--
-
~
Chrome Diopside
>l%Cr2 Oi
-
-
not picked
-
-
-
-
-
--
--
-
-
-
--
--
--
-
-
Chromite
--i
not picked
1
--
--
-
15
--
--
--
-
-
--
--
--
-
2
Picro- ilmenite
-i
not picked
1
-
-
--
15
--
-
--
--
-
--
-
--
-
--
Comments
-several augite, -several pelletal or-red Ca-Mg almandine, -pyrope fragment of larger grain
-some augite. -15 opaques, 2 small octahedrons of chromite, -several brown metallic pellets, -several pelletal or-red Ca-Mg almandine, 1 with rutile inclusions.
-some pellet Ca- Mg almandine, -several augite.
KIMBERLITE INDICATOR MINERALS MICROPROBE RESULTSKAP PROPERTY, ECCLESTONE TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO Page 4 of 12.
Microprobe: R.L. Barnett GeologicalLambeth, Ontario
Petrology: Robert DillmanARJADEE PROSPECTING
Sample Number
B-3
B-4
B-5
B-6
Type
Stream Sediment
Glacial Till
Glacial Till
Glacial Till
UTM and Grid Coord.
357670m. E. 5455395 m. N.
GRID B1+20 W 1+90S
357075 m. E. 5455515 m. N.
GRIDS6+40W 0+60N
355975 m. E. 5456225 m. N.
GRIDS16+90W8+25N
356205 m. E. 5456340 m. N.
Claim Number
1231221
1231221
1231049
1231049
Grain Size
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
-1.0 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 -0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
Pyrope Garnet
-------
-
-
-
~-----
-------
Chrome Diopside
> IVo Cr^Os
~
-
~
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
Chromite
~-----
-
-
i
~----3
-
--
-
-
1
Picro- ilmenite
------
-
-
~
-----3
-
-
--
-
1
Comments
—good concentrate, -several or-red Ca- Mg almandine, -several augite.
-trace of pellet almandine & augite.
-good number of augite, -several Ca-Mg almandine, -traces of pyrite.
-some augite, -several Ca-Mg
almandine.
KIMBERLITE INDICATOR MINERALS MICROPROBE RESULTSKAP PROPERTY, ECCLESTONE TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO Page 5 of 12.
Microprobe: R.L. Barnett GeologicalLambeth, Ontario
Petrology: Robert DillmanARJADEE PROSPECTING
Sample Number
B-7
GR-1
CB-1
D-l
Type
Glacial Till
Glacial Till
Glacial Till
Glacial Till
UTM and Grid Coord.
356395 m. E. 5456425 m. N.
355135m. E. 5450830 m. N.
C Grid 0+60W 1+75S
358345m. E. 5451095 m. N.
359500m. E. 5449950 m. N.
D Grid 6+90W2+20S
Claim Number
1231049
1237539
1231226
1231227
Grain Size
-1.0 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.1 4 -0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
Pyrope Garnet
~--~
-~---
---~-
-----~
Chrome Diopside
>^^Cr2 o3~--
-----~5
-
-
-
~
~
-
-
-
-
--
Chromite
---i
i----3
~
--
--
-
-
~
-
-
-
5
Picro- ilmenite
~-i
i----3
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
5
Comments
-trace pyrite, -trace augite, -some pelletal Ca- Mg almandine.
-lots of black amphibole, -some augite, -bright green cpx similar to Grid D cpx. -some pelletal or- red almandine.
-trace augite.
-abundant dull green cpx, some in composite with dark green amphibole, source very close, -several red zircon crystals. -5 pellet opaques.
KIMBERLITE INDICATOR MINERALS MICROPROBE RESULTSKAP PROPERTY, ECCLESTONE TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO Page 6 of 12.
Microprobe: R.L. Barnett GeologicalLambeth, Ontario
Petrology: Robert DillmanARJADEE PROSPECTING
Sample Number
D-2
KAP
CPX-1
CPX-2
Type
Stream Sediment
Stream Sediment
Stream Sediment
Stream Sediment
UTM and Grid Coord.
359830m. E. 5449871 m. N.
D Grid3+60W 2+05S
359831m. E. 5449865 m. N.
D Grid3+58W 2+12S
359790m. E. 5449900 m. N.
D Grid 3+90W 1+84S
359827m. E. 5449880 m. N.
D Grid3+70W 2+02S
Claim Number
1231229
1231229
1231229
1231229
Grain Size
*1.0mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 -0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
Pyrope Garnet
-
-
--
--
--
-i-i--
--------
-------
Chrome Diopside
>l%Cr2 Oi
+50
+100
+100
+100
+100
+50
+100
+100
+100
+100
-------
--
1--
1--
Chromite
-
-
--
-
8
--
1
2
3
-
--
-
--
--
1
-
--
--
-
2
Picro- ilmenite
-
-
--
--
8
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
Comments
-abundant bright green diopside & augite, numerous large grains, -euhedral red amphibole? -several chromite octahedral, -lots of pelletalor + or-red Ca-Mg almandine.
Sample submitted to DeBeers lab. -Cr diopside not probed. -2 octahedral chromite.
-abundant black amphibole, -some pelletal or- red almandine.
-abundant black amphibole, -some pelletal or- red almandine, -trace pyrite.
KIMBERLITE INDICATOR MINERALS MICROPROBE RESULTSKAP PROPERTY, ECCLESTONE TOWNSHIP. ONTARIO Page 7 of 12.
Microprobe: R.L. Barnett GeologicalLambeth, Ontario
Petrology: Robert DillmanARJADEE PROSPECTING
Sample Number
CPX-3
CPX-4
CPX-5
GC-7
Type
Stream Sediment
Stream Sediment
Glacial Till
Stream Sediment
UTM and Grid Coord.
359829m. E. 5449874 m. N.
D Grid 3+61W1+97S
359875m. E. 5449900 m. N.
D Grid3+20W 1+80S
359875m. E. 5450030 m. N.
D Grid 2+90W 0+35N
360330 m. E. 5456485 m. N.
E Grid 0+30E 3+OOS
Claim Number
1231229
1231229
1231229
1231235
Grain Size
H-1.0mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
-1.0 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
Pyrope Garnet
---------
-----
-
-
-
-
-
not picked
-
-
Chrome Diopside
>l%Cri O3
+50
+100
+100
+100
+100
--
-
--
--
s
-
-
-
-
--
not picked
-
-
Chromite
—-----10
------
-
-
-
-
-
not picked
-
-
Picro- ilmenite
-----
10
-------
--
-
-
-
2
not picked
2
-
Comments
-abundant fresh Cr diopside, -some euhedral red amphibole, -pelletal opaques -fairly abundant pellet-shape or-red Ca-Mg almandine, -target very close.
-hundreds of fresh diopside. -8 very-bright green diopsides, two populations cpx?
-small concentrate, -several pelletal or-red garnet.
-good tenor of or- red Ca-Mg almandine garnet, one grain with chlorite rim. -some augite grains, -pellet-shape ilmenite. -1 rutile. -3 apatite.
KIMBERLITE INDICATOR MINERALS MICROPROBE RESULTSKAP PROPERTY, ECCLESTONE TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO Page 8 of 12.
Microprobe: R.L. Barnett GeologicalLambeth, Ontario
Petrology: Robert Dill m anARJADEE PROSPECTING
Sample Number
GC-8
GC-9
GC- 10
GC- 11
Type
Stream Sediment
Stream Sediment
Stream Sediment
Stream Sediment
UTM and Grid Coord.
360320 m. E. 5456460 ra. N.
E Grid0+05W3+25S
360250 m. E. 5456325 m. N.
E Grid 1+15W 4+50S
359940 E.5457155 m. N.
E Grid 4+30W 3+20N
360060 E. 5456915m. N.
E Grid 3+10W 1+80N
Claim Number
1231235
1231235
1237533
1237533
Grain Size
+1.0 mm
O.S - 1.0 mm
0.14 -0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 -O.S mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
^1.0mm
O.S - 1.0 mm
0.14 - O.S mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Notjjrobed
Pyrope Garnet
-----
--~-~
-------
-----~
Chrome Diopside
>\%Cr^ O3
-
---1
-1--1~
--------
-------
Chromite
----2
1
3
2
6
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
Picro- ilmenite
------i
ii3
5
-
~
-
-
-
-
--
-
--
-
1
Comments
-traces of augite.-several enstatite grains.
-1 perovskite. -3 rutile. -1 Nb rutile. -2 apatite. -+10 or-red Ca- Mg almandine.
-several pellet- shaped or-red almandine, -several augite.
KIMBERLITE INDICATOR MINERALS MICROPROBE RESULTSKAP PROPERTY, ECCLESTONE TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO Page 9 of 12.
Microprobe: R.L. Barnett GeologicalLambeth, Ontario
Petrology: Robert DillmanARJADEE PROSPECTING
Sample Number
GC- 12
GC- 13
GC- 14
GC- 15
Type
Stream Sediment
Stream Sediment
Stream Sediment
Stream Sediment
UTM and Grid Coord.
360525m. E. 5457170m. N.
E Grid1+20E 3+70N
360175m. E. 5456845 m. N.
E Grid 1+15E 1+OON
360960m. E.5457325 m. N.
E Grid 7+30E 3+80N
361135m. E. 5457460 m. N.
E Grid 8+05E7+25N
Claim Number
1237531
1237533
1237531
1237532
Grain Size
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - O.S mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
Pyrope Garnet
-
-
-
--
~
------
-------
------
Chrome Diopside
>l%Cr2 O3
--
-
-
--
2
-
--
--
-
-
-
--
-
--
5
--
-
-
-
--
Chromite
--
-
-
--
i
--i2
3
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
--
--
-
-
Picro- ilmenite
--
--
-
-
2
--
--
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
2
--
-
-
-
-
Comments
-abundant hornblende. -2 Cr cpx similar toG2-18cpx(D Grid), -some augite. -+20 pelletal or- red Ca-Mg almandine, -some pyrite with quartz.
-several pellet- shaped Ca-Mg almandine garnet, -several shades of green augite, no Cr diopside.
-large broken pellets of chromite- picroilmenite, 1 with possible luecoxene. -some bright green cpx similar to G2- 18 cpx. -trace enstatite
-W/a pyrite, many eueheral grains and composites with quartz, source close to sample site. -3 G2-18-type cpx.
KIMBERLITE INDICATOR MINERALS MICROPROBE RESULTSKAP PROPERTY, ECCLESTONE TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO Page 10 of 12.
Microprobe: R.L. Barnett GeologicalLambeth, Ontario
Petrology: Robert Dill m anARJADEE PROSPECTING
Sample Number
GC- 16
GC- 17
GC- 18
GC- 19
Type
Glacial Till
Glacial Till
Stream Sediment
Stream Sediment
UTM and Grid Coord.
359950m. E. 5456720 m. N.
E Grid 5+95W 0+45S
362055m. E. 5457265 m. N.
362520m. E. 5457075 m. N.
362130m. E. 5456835 m. N.
Claim Number
1231235
1237532
East of 1237531
1237531
Grain Size
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 -0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 -0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
Pyrope Garnet
--
not picked
--
--
--
-
-
-
-
--
--
not picked
-
--
-
--
not picked
-
-
Chrome Diopside
^roOjOj
-
--not picked
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
not picked
-
-
5
5
not picked
+50
+100
Chromite
----
not picked
--
1
-
--
-
-
7
--
-
not picked
-
2
--
--
not picked
-
-
Picro- ilmenite
---
not picked
--
1
-
-
--
-
7
--
--
not picked
-
-
-
1
not picked
-
-
Comments
-fresh dark green cpx? and ragged ilmenite, -several orange almandine pellets.
-opaques small pellets and fragments of larger grains, -enstatite, -several orange almandine pellets.
-1 rounded octahedron of chromite, -several clear and brown euhedral zircons, -good tenor of crustal il?
-abundant fresh Cr diopside, similar toG2-18cpx, close to source.
KIMBERLITE INDICATOR MINERALS MICROPROBE RESULTSKAP PROPERTY, ECCLESTONE TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO Page 11 of 12.
Microprobe: R.L. Barnett GeologicalLambeth, Ontario
Petrology: Robert DillmanARJADEE PROSPECTING
Sample Number
GC-20
GC-21
GC-23
AL-1
Type
Glacial Till
Glacial Till
Glacial Till
Glacial Fluvial Esker
UTM and Grid Coord.
362515m. E. 5456875 m. N.
361580m. E.5456530m. N.
360060m. E. 5459180m. N.
353340m. E.5455455 m. N.
Claim Number
East of 1237531
1237531
1237537
1239236
Grain Size
-H.Omm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
4-1.0mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.1 4 -0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
Pyrope Garnet
---------
--------
--—-----
----
not picked
-
--
Chrome Diopside
>1%C^^ O3
--
-
-
-
-
--
--
--
-
-
-
-
--
--
--
-
--
not picked
-
-
Chromite
-------
3
--
--
--
-
-
--
--
--
-
2
-
--
not picked
-
--
Picro- ilmenite
-------i
---------
-------
2
-
--
not picked
-
-
Comments
-traces of augite, -opaque pellets.
-traces of G2- 18 cpx.
-several augite grains. -8 pelletal orange almandine.
KIMBERLITE INDICATOR MINERALS MICROPROBE RESULTSKAP PROPERTY, ECCLESTONE TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO Page 12 of 12.
Microprobe: R.L. Barnett GeologicalLambeth, Ontario
Petrology: Robert DillmanARJADEE PROSPECTING
Sample Number
AL-2
AL-3
AL-4
GC-2 (collected in
1998)
Type
Glacial Till
Glacial Till
Glacial Till
Stream Sediment
UTM and Grid Coord.
352800m. E. 5455045 m. N.
352855m. E. 5455160m. N.
353475m. E. 5456250 m. N.
360330 m. E. 5456485 m. N.
E Grid0+75E 1+75S
Claim Number
1239236
1239236
1231231
1231235
Grain Size
+1.0 mm
0.5- 1.0mm
0.14 -0.5 mm
TOTAL KJM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
-t-1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
O.S - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
+1.0 mm
0.5 - 1.0 mm
0.14 - 0.5 mm
TOTAL KIM's
Suspected KIM's Not probed
Pyrope Garnet
~~~--
-i-i-
~----
------
Chrome Diopside
>l%Cr2 O3
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
~
-
~
-
-
-
-
~
-
~
Chromite
~~~-
7
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
-
-
~
-
3
2
5
-
Picro- ilmenite
-~~-
7
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Comments
-lots of dull green augite. -well-preserved octahedron of chromite, -good tenor of purple zircon, -several peiletal or-red Ca-Mg almandine.
-10 purple zircons, pellets + small euhedral crystals. -pyrope fragment of larger grain, -some dull green augite, -close to source of zircon.
-several peiletal or-red almandine.
-pellet shaped chrorm'tes.
GARNET, R, DILLMAN, KAP SAHPLES, September 13 1999, R.L.6.
1SI02 38.08TI02 .10A203 22.64C203 .09FED 30.26MGQ 5.43MNO 2.89GAO .61SUM 100.10
SI 5.975AL .025 6AL 4.162TI .012CR .011FE 3.971MN .384MG 1.270CA .103 90 24.000
F/M 3.F/FH
1 SAMPLE Al2 SAMPLE Al3 SAMPLE ftl4 SAMPLE A25 SAMPLE A26 SAMPLE A37 SAMPLE A38 SAMPLE A3
* 5..000* 4.*** 3.** 1..912* 24.
429774
GRAIN 8GRAIN 9GRAIN 10GRAIN 12GRAIN 13GRAIN 9GRAIN 10GRAIN 11
238.91
.0522.47
.2327,247.34.29
3.69100.22
993 *007 6.000071 *006 *028 *509 *038 *685 -*609 9.946000 *
2.105.678
338.20
.0622.84
.0930.725.721.56.96
100.15
5.971 *.029 6.000
4.177 *.007 *.011 *
4.016 *.207 *
1.333 *.161 9.911
24.000 *3.168.760
438.61
.0222.81
.1228.927.121.99.59
100.18
5.984 *.016 6.000
4.151 *.002 *.015 *
3.749 *.261 *
1.645 *.098 9.921
24.000 *2.438.709
539.
22.,
26.9.1,1.
100.
5.978.022
4.109.000.013
3.347.133
2.126.219
24.000
180098112335033422
*6.000
******
9.948*
1.637.621
i38
22
277
2100
5.945.055
4.022.010.017
3.547.105
1.838.457
24.000
i.48.09.39.14.45.98.80.76.09
*6.000
ttt***
9.995t
1.987.665
738.74
.0922.72
.1426.338.20.63
3.34100.19
5.948 *.052 6.000
4.059 *.010 *.017 *
3.381 *.082 *
1.877 *.549 9.975
24.000 *1.845.649
838,
22.
30.5,1.2,
100,
5.968.032
4.052.001.035
4.007.228
1.284.362
24.000
110113286050721651
*6.000
*****i
9.969*
3.299.767
GARNET, R. DILLMAN, KAP SAMPLES, September 13 1999, R.L.B.
SI02TI02A203C203FEDMGDMNOCAOSUM
SIALALTICRFEMNMGCA0
937.68
.0821.95
.0330.866.281.391.66
99.93
5.932 *.068 6.000
4.004 *.009 *.004 *
4.063 *.185 *
1.474 *.280 10.019
24.000 *F/M 2,883F/FH .742
5.
4.
3.
1,
24
9 SAMPLE A3 GRAIN 12
GARNETKAR - A1
R. DILLMAN (Sept. 9 1999)
o RLB
GARNET - R. OILLMAN KAR - A2 (Sept. 9 1999)
14
O
** * ______ A
wt % CaO
o RLB
GARNET - R. DILLMAN KAR - A3 (Sept. 9 1999)
wt % CaO
o RLB
ECL-PYROPE, R. OILLMAN, October 15 1999, R.L.B,
1SI02 38.22TI02 .11A203 22.37C203 .03FEO 24.93MGD 7.27MHO .94CAO 6.36NA20 .04SUM 100.27
SI 5.898AL .102 6AL 3.965TI .013CR .004FE 3.217MN .123MG 1.672CA 1.052NA .012 100 24.000
F/M 1.F/FM
1 SAMPLE A-32 SAMPLE A-33 SAMPLE A-34 SAMPLE A-35 SAMPLE A-36 SAMPLE A-37 SAMPLE A-38 SAMPLE A-3
238.
21.
25.6.1.6.
100.
* 5.904.000 .096* 3.915* .013* .002* 3.332* .155* 1.562* i. 090.058 .012* 24.000
997666
GRAIN 41GRAIN 43GRAIN 45GRAIN 47GRAIN 48GRAIN 52GRAIN 53GRAIN 54
14119902747718570456
*6.000
*******
10.081*
2.232.691
338,
22.
22.8.1.6.
100.
5.878.122
3.960.014.008
2.864.141
1.9311.136.012
24.000
471267074148.0994.0429
*6.000
****l**
10.067*
1.556.609
437.93
.0222.71
.0529.657.341.141.18.04
100.06
5.907 *.093 6.000
4.075 *.002 *.006 *
3.862 *.150 *
1.704 *.197 *.012 10.008
24.000 *2.355.702
538.33
.0621.97
.0226.636.88.68
5.75.03
100.35
5.938 *.062 6.000
3.949 *.007 *.002 *
3.450 *.089 *
1.589 *.954 *.009 10.050
24.000 *2.228.690
637.
22.
25.7.
6.
99.
5.863.137
3.931.003.007
3.279.118
1.7251.024.012
24.000
80032606284690160499
t6.000
*tif
if
tif
t
10.100*
1.970.663
138.
21,
26,6.
6.
100,
5.919.081
3.928.011.016
3.450.117
1.4811.046.015
24.000
1
.1409.9213.5840.89.29.05.49
t6.000
***t***
10.063*
2.409.707
838.10
.0622.62
.0630.137.11.67
1.28.02
100.05
5.933 *.067 6.000
4.084 *.007 *.007 *
3.924 *.088 *
1.650 *.214 *.006 9.981
24.000 *2.431.709
GARNET - R. DILLMAN A-3 (Sept. 26 1999)
14 Z•'O
z zs\2 z
-0-4 5 fi
wt ** CaO10
o RLB
ECLOGITIC GARNET - R. DILLMAN A-3 (Sept. 26 1999)
oCM CO
#
v.zu
0.18-
0.16-0.14-
0.12
0.10-
0.080.06-
0.04-
O.02-
0.00 C
o o -oooo
o o
1 l 1 l 1 l 1 l 1 l 1 l 1 l 1 ) 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1
wt CaO
RLB
ECLOGITIC GARNET - R. DILLMAN A-3 (Sept. 26 1993)
z.vu
1.80-
1.60-
04 1.40-
jZ 1 -20
1.00
0.80
* 0.60-
0.40
O.20-
0.00 C
^? ^o
) 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1
wt ** CaO
o RLB
CLINOPYROXENE, R. DILLMAN, KAR SAMPLES, September 13 1999, R.L.B.
SI02TI02A203C203FEOMGDMNOCAOK20NA20SUM
SIALALTICRFEMGMNCANAX0
1234
154.03
.141.40.08
6.8413.78
.2323.17
.01
.58100.26
1.993.007' 2.053.004.002.211.757.007.916.041.000 1
6.000F/MF/FM
SAMPLE A2SAMPLE A2SAMPLE A2SAMPLE A3
*.000*****t**.993*
288224
GRAINGRAINGRAINGRAIN
254.
5.13.
24.
99.
2.009.000.033.001.006.183.753.012.953.035.001
6.000
16171813
3805762193683807024997
*2.009
**t*****
1.978*
.259
.206
352.
3.1.3.
15.
21.
100.
1.933.067.064.018.039.118.848.004.843.062.000
6.000
9965053487601456018708
*2.000
********
1.995*
.144
.126
454.
5.13.
,
24.
100.
2.013.000.029.000.005.177.751.008.963.045.001
6.000
5800671674662738036312
2
1
f
*.013*i**l***.980*
247198
CLINOPYROXENE - R. DILLMAN KAR - A2 (Sept. 9 1999)
W
OL.
0
#•*"*
D.U
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
n f\
* l ' l ' i ' l ' l '
-
-
'
-
Om
^
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
wt
o RLB
NaO
O
o
CHROME DIOPSIDE - R. DILLMAN KAR - A2 (Sept 9 1999)
o.u4.5-
4.0-
3 A -.W
.O
2.0-
1.5 J
1.0-
0.5-
A A
-t
xx
\)/
M —— *"""~__ ̂..
1\x
'X""N
\\
\
\N,
"~~
v^.o
j
-— ̂
l^
—— t
o- >
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
wt CaO
RLB
O
o
CHROME DIOPSIDE - R. DILLMAN KAP - A3 (Sept. 9 1999)
o.u4.5-
4.0-
3 A -,\J
2 fi -.O
2.0-
1.0-
0.5-
ft ft
-i
X1
-"^'
\
)
X
J^*— - i — _ .-^
—~ ~^
r\)
"N\
\\
\
V\\
-•— w-
^^
^
4O
1O 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
wt CaO
o RLB
6
CLINOPYROXENE - R. DILLMAN KAP - A3 (Sept. 9 1999)6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.00.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
wt % Na aO
o RLB
CLINOPYROXENE, R. DILLMAN, October 15 1999, R.L.8.
1SI02 53,77TI02 .04A203 1.11C203 .13FED 6.48MGD 14.26MNO .22CAO 24.11K20 .03NA20 .44SUM 100.59
SI 1.981 *AL .019 2.000AL .029 *TI .001 *CR .004 *FE .200 *MG .783 *MN .007 *CA .952 *NA .031 *K .001 2.0080 6.000 *
F/tl .264F/FM .209
1 SAMPLE A-3 GRAIN2 SAMPLE A-3 GRAIN3 SAMPLE A-3 GRAIN4 SAMPLE A-3 GRAIN5 SAMPLE A-3 GRAIN6 SAMPLE A-3 GRAIN7 SAMPLE A-3 GRAIN8 SAMPLE A-3 GRAIN
253.48
.05
.90
.046.9814.35
.4323.60
.03
.61100.47
1.979 *.021 2.000.018 *.001 *.001 *.216 . *.791 *.013 *.936 *.044 *.001 2.022
6.000 *.290.225
23 INCL APAT24252728303134
353.67
.02
.30
.036.9714.09
.1424.90
.03
.43100,58
1.988 *.012 2.000.001 *.001 *.001 *.216 *.778 *.004 *.988 *.031 *.001 2.021
6.000 *.283.221
452.41
.191.67.02
9.5413.27
.2921.86
.03
.7099.98
1.963 *.037 2.000.037 *.005 *.001 *.299 *.741 *.009 *.877 *.051 *.001 2.021
6.000 *.416.294
552.01
.151.61.00
11.5012.18
.3122.34
.03
.44100.57
1.956 *.044 2.000.028 *.004 *.000 *.362 *.683 *.010 *.900 *.032 *.001 2.020
6.000 *.544.352
653.12
.00
.75
.167.14
13.74.40
24.48.03.62
100.44
1.975 *.025 2.000.008 *.000 *.005 *.222 *.761 *.013 *.975 *.045 *.001 2.029
6.000 *.308.236
753.38
.051.36.00
6.6214.49
.1823.79
.03
.58100.48
1.970 *.030 2.000.029 *.001 *.000 *.204 *.797 *.006 *.941 *.041 *.001 2.021
6.000 *.263.208
353.18
.011.16.12
7.0314.13
.2423.45
.02
.6499.98
1.976 *.024 2.000.027 *.000 *.004 *.218 *.783 *.008 *.934 *.046 *.001 2.020
6.000 *.289.224
CLINOPYROXENE, R. DILLMAN, October 15 1999, R.L.B.
9SI02 53.16TI02 .02A203 1.03C203 .17FED 6.05MGD 14.50UNO .17CACI 24.55K20 .03NA20 .58SUH 100.26
SI 1.968 *AL .032 2.000AL .013 *TI .001 * 'CR .005 *FE .187 *MG .800 *MN .005 *CA .974 *NA .042 *K .001 2.0280 6.000 *
F/H .241F/FM .194
9 SAMPLE A-3 GRAIN10 SAMPLE A-3 GRAIN11 SAMPLE A-3 GRAIN12 SAMPLE A-3 GRAIN13 SAMPLE A-3 GRAIN
1053.62
.001.14.43
6.7314.89
.1322.93
.03
.60100.50
1.975 *.025 2.000.025 *.000 *.013 *.207 *.818 *.004 *.905 *.043 *.001 2.016
6.000 *.259.205
3637383940
1153.41
.021.45.23
6.8814.76
.2622.79
.03
.66100.49
1.969 *.031 2.000.032 *.001 *.007 *.212 *.811 *.008 *.900 *.047 *.001 2.020
6.000 *.272.214
1254.38
.00
.75
.573.86
15.99.15
24.04.02.75
100.51
1.984 *.016 2.000.016 *.000 *.016 *.118 *.870 *.005 *.940 *.053 *.001 2.019
6.000 *.141.123
1352.01
.163.77.23
7.1313.82
.2122.66
.04
.53100.56
1.917 *.083 2.000.081 *.004 *.007 *.220 *.759 *.007 *.895 *.038 *.002 2.013
6.000 *.298.230
CHROME DIOPSIDE - R. DILLMAN A-3 (Sept. 20 1999)
o.u4.5-
4.0-
W a -OCM 30 .^ 4.V
0 . .2.5-
&.U
"5 1.5-1.0-
O.5-
n n
-1
,/
'X^J
\
xX
^- i " — **
~~-..
\\f
\
\\
\
V\\
^.
^v^
__ w
^
'-'s,
l\
,t^
^ —
4
^ x^,.1O 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26
wt CaO
RLB
CLINOPYROXENE - R. DILLMAN A-3 (Sept. 26 1999)
6.0
5.0
O* 4.044
63.0
2.0
1.0
0.0O.O 1.0 2.0 3.O 4.0 5.O 6.0
wt ** NatO
o RLB
CHROMITE, R, DILLMAK, KAP SAMPLES, Septa.ber 13 1999, R.L.B.
SI02 T 102 A203 C203 FED '
MNO MGDZNO NIO SUM
SI TI AL CR FE MN MG W NI 0
1.00 .16
20.98 48.99 16.00
.43 13.71
2 .09.25
16.88 52.78 14.31
.35 14.72
(\A00 ' uu '.13 -13
100.40 99.51
000 * - 023 * 030 * - 047 *
6 098 * 5.000 * 9|554 * 10.489 * 3.301 * 3.008 *
090 * - 075 * 5.041 * 5.515 *
000 * - 000 * '02624.140 .02624.182
32.000 * 32.000 * F/H -673 ' 559 F/FM .402 ' 359
1 SAMPLE Al2 SAMPLE A23 SAMPLE A24 SAMPLE A25 SAMPLE A36 SAMPLE A3
GRAIN 5GRAIN 4GRAIN 5GRAIN 9GRAIN 2GRAIN 8
3 .00.25
17.21 53.87 13.43
.33 14.97
.00
.19 100.25
.000 * .047 *
5.043 * 10.592 * 2.793 * .070 *
5.549 * .000 * .038 24.132
32.000 * .516 .340
4 .00.26
15.92 53.61 15.43
.47 14.32
.10
.09 100.20
.000 * .049 *
4.730 * 10.687 * 3.254 * .100 *
5.382 * .019 * .018 24.239
32.000 * .623 .384
5.06 .27
15,99 52.24 16.05
.38 14.30
.07
.16 99.52
.015 * .052 *
4.785 * 10.490 * 3.409 * .082 *
. 5.413 * .013 * .033 24.292
32.000 * .645 .392
6 .00 .24
17.26 54.00 14.59
.36 13.43
.11
.20100.19
.000 * .045 *
5.097 * 10.699 * 3.058 * .076 *
5.017 * .020 * .040 24.053
32.000 * .625 .385
70
60
M
O40
10
CHROMITE - R. DILLMAN KAR - A1 (Sept. 9 1999)
l i l i l i l i l i i T r ' l ' l '
Diamond Inclusion Field
l l l li ! l l l .1 l l t l l l l
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
wt % MgO
o RLB
CHROMITE - R. DILLMAN KAR - A2 (Sept. 9 1999)
70
60
d60M
Q40
#30
10
Diamond Inclusion Field
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
wt ** MgO
o RLB
60
d60en
O40
#30
10
O
CHROMITE - R. DILLMAN KAR - A3 (Sept. 9 1999)
T O ' i i i ' i i i ' i i i i i ' rDiamond Inclusion F told
o
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
wt *fc MgO
o RLB
ILMENITE, R. DILLMAN, KAP SAMPLES, September 13 1999, R.L.B.
1SI02 .01TI02 50.61A203 .35C203 .18FED 38.90MNO .47MGD 8.93ZNO .00NIO .08N205 .01SUM 99.54
SI .003 *TI 9.379 *AL .107 *CR .037 *FE 8.444 *MN .103 *MG 3.455 *ZN .000 *NI .017 *NB .001 22.0450 32.000 *
F/M 2.474F/FM .712
1 SAMPLE Al GRAIN2 SAMPLE A3 GRAIN3 SAMPLE A3 GRAIN
.....l. SAMPLE A,? , GRAIN
2.02
48.76.32.00
43.84.95
5.46.14.13.20
99.82
.005 *9.780 *.101 *.000 *
9.778 *.215' *
2.171 *.028 *.028 *.024 22.129
32.000 *4.604.822
414
-^-. -, ^
3.00
49.58.03
3.0136.65
.519.68.00.16.24
99.86
.000 *9.614 *.009 *.614 *
7.903 *.111 *
3.720 *.000 *.033 *.028 22.033
32.000 *2.154.683
4.04
52.15.13.00
44.49.55
2.84.11.12.00
100.43
.011 *10.386 *
.041 *
.000 *9.854 *.123 *
1.121 *.022 *.026 *.000 21.583
32.000 *8.900.899
5.00
49.26.43.00
41.49.59
7.38.00.00.12
99.27
.000 *9.782 *.134 *.000 *
9.163 *.132 *
2.905 *.000 *.000 *.014 22.129
32.000 *3.200.762
6.01
49.02.43.00
41.31.56
7.26.18.00.00
98.77
.003 *9.791 *.135 *.000 *
9.176 *.126 *
2.874 *.035 *.000 *.000 22.139
32.000 *3.236.764
ILMENITE - R. DILLMAN KAR - A1 (Sept. 9 1999)
109
8
O5
3
21
l l ! l l l O l l l l l l l l l l l
4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
wt ** MgO
RLB
U)OCM .O
ILMENITE - R. DILLMAN KAR - A1 (Sept. 9 1999)
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0 i t i
O 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Wt
o RLB
MgO
in OCM .0
ILMENITE - R. DILLMAN KAP - A3 (Sept. 9 1999)
u.o
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
/t f*
iiiiiiiii
-
-
-
-
-o
o
-
.,... .....JU.A.— 1— ——— 1 ——— -i.. — ,,-L. ..J ——— ..-L..,., i. l
O 2 4 6 81012141618 20
wt MgO
o RLB
109 -
8
7O•-"e o
5*4**
* 3
21
ILMENITE - R. DILLMAN KAR - A3 (Sept. 9 1999)
o
4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 2O 22
wt ** MgO
RLB
OLIVINE, R. DILLMAN, October 15 1999, R.L.B.
SI02TI02A203C203FEDMGOHNOCAOK20NA20NIOSUM
SIALALTICRFEMNMGCAKNANI0
148.
4.
30.15.
99,
1.255.131.000.001.001.664.017.602.004.002.002.000
4.000FOFA
F/H F/FM
200626074952751605040060
i1.386
******t**
1.294*
47.5752.43
1.130 .530
l SAMPLE A-3 GRAIN 22
September 13 1999,Mr. R. Diliman,R. J. Dillman Geological Services,8901 Reily Drive,RR 5, Mount Brydges,NOL 1WO
Ph/Fax 1-519-264-9278
R. L. Barnett Geological Consulting Inc., 9684 Longwoods Road, RR 32, London, Ontario. N6P 1P2
Ph. 1-519-652-1498 Fax 1-519-652-1475
Dear Robert,
The identity of "non-indicator" minerals, in the KAP samples A, GD, BP and RG, received September 9 1999, for which analyses were not provided is:
Al grains 1,2,3 ' 6
71112
A2 grains l2,3,6- 1011, 14 15
A3 grains 3 5 7
tourmalines. ilmenitealmandinegrossular almandine ssspessartine almandine ss
perovskites. ilmeniteamphibolespessartine almandine ssgrossular andradite ss
melanite tourmaline s. ilmenite
Sincerely,
R. L. Barnett
Mr. R. Dillman, October 15 1999,
R. J. Dillman Geological Services, 8901 Reily Drive, RR 5, Mount Brydges, NOL 1WO
Ph/Fax 1-519-264-9278
R. L. Barnett Geological Consulting Inc., 9684 Longwoods Road, RR 32, London, Ontario. N6P 1P2
Ph. 1-519-652-1498 Pax 1-519-652-1475
Dear Robert,
,analyses were not provided is:A-3 grains 1,2,23,26.29,32.33.35 - archibole
3,4,6,8,9,10,12,15-18,20 - simple ilmenite5,19,21 - rutile11 - tourmaline13 - lithic42,56 - alnvandine44,46,49-51 - spessartine almandine ss55 - zircon57,58 - epidote59,60 - quartz
80
JUPGemcal Prospecting Syndicate-CAN997143
75
70 -
65 4-
60 j
55 -
50 -
40 -
35
30 ^
Diamond inclusions
2510
MgO wt. "/o
12 14 16 18 20
Gemcal Prospecting Syndicate - CAN99143
'ORIGINATOR i SAMPLE [MOUNT [CRN 'SIZE [MNO [NA2O |AL2O3 |FEO [SIO2CAN99/0143CAN99/0143CAN99/0143
IG2-18 i 1G2-18 l 1:G4 ——— - ~TT- -
1:2,3!
0.30.3 i0.3
0.290.22o.os]
00.02
o|
11.2: 21.03! 019.15j 19.56! 0.0130.22 1 20.01; 0
TIO2 GAO ICR2O3 |MGO !TOTAL2.26! 0[ 521.27 1 0 45
1.7 0 31
23!8141
13.1713.7515.02
100.1799.7998.41
VIBLBLBL
Page 1 of 1
PYROPE, R, DILLMAN, October 13 1999, R.L.8.
SI02TI02A203C203FEOMGOMNOCAOSUM
SIALALTICRFEMNMGCft0
41
196619
5100
5.930.070
3.202.010.783.815.051
4.278.891
24.000F/M F/FM
1.07.09.23.86.75.88.42.76.06
*6.000
***t**
10.031*
.203
.168
l GAR GRAIN l
GARNET - R. DILLMAN GAR GRAIN 1 (Oct. 13 1999)
16
14/
77O
*- *
1O
zzA2
6Z Z1 2 456
wt ** CaO10
RLB
CLINOPYROXENE, R. DILLMAN, October 13 1999, R.L.8.
SI02TI02A203C203FEDMGOMNOCAOK20NA20SUM
SIALALTICRFEMGMNCANAK0
1
155.
3.
7.14.
,
16.
2.100.
1.997.003.154.006.004.214.806.002.623.210.004
6.000F/M F/FM
1223681305920806089934
*2.000
********
2.023*
.268
.211
CPX GRAIN 1
o o
5.0
4.5
4.0
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
CHROME DIOPSIDE - R. DILLMAN CPX GRAIN 1 (Oct. 13 1999)
,
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
wt CaO
RLB
CLINOPYROXENE - R. DILLMIAN CPX GRAIN 1 (Oct. 13 1999)6.0
5.0
O., 4.0
63.0
2.0
1.0
0.00.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
Wt **
o RLB
CHROMITE, R. DILLMAN, October 13 1999, R.L.B.
SI02TI02A203C203FEDMNOMGDZNONIOSUM
SITIALCRFEMNMGZNNI0
1.05
1.6231.5731.4220.11
.2015.15
.00
.13100.25
.012 *
.288 *8.799 *5.875 *3.978 *.040 *
5.341 *.000 *.025 24.358
32.000 *F/M .752F/FM .429
2.07
1.2319.3345.9519.64
.2313.77
.00
.15100.37
.018 *
.231 *5.698 *9.087 *4.108 *.049 *
5.134 ' t.000 *.030 24.355
32.000 *.810.447
3.06
2.1310.1254.1220.59
.2712.55
.00
.25100.09
.016 *
.421 *3'. 134 *
11.245. *4.525 ' *.060 *
4.916 *.000 *.053 24.371
32.000 *.933.483
1 OPAQUE GRAIN l2 OPAQUE GRAIN 23 OPAQUE GRAIN 3
60
q,
1O
Dr8.fr n.CHROMITE - R. DILLMAN
OPAQUE GRAINS 1,2,3 (Oct. 13 1999)70 i ' r ' i ' i ' i ' r
Diamond Inclusion Field
O
O
l , l l l ! l t l l l l l l l l l l
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
wt ** MgO
RLB
CHROMITE, R. OILLMAN, October 15 1999, R.L.8.
1SI02 .04TI02 3.39A203 24.18C203 25.88FED 32.40MNO .28MGD 12.76ZNO .00NIO .26SUM 99.19
SI .010TI .652ftl 7.283CR 5.230FE 6.926MN .061MG 4.862ZN .000NI .053 250 32.000
F/H 1.F/FM
1 SAMPLE GC-22 SAMPLE GC-23 SAMPLE GC-24 SAMPLE GC-25 SAMPLE GC-26 SAMPLE GC-77 SAMPLE GC-98 SAMPLE GC-9
t*ttt***.077*437590
GRAINGRAINGRAINGRAINGRAINGRAINGRAINGRAIN
2.08
1.0027.1039.8414.51
.2216.96
.00
.29100.00
.019 *
.179 *7.588 *7.485 *2.883 *.044 *
6.007 . *.000 *.055 24.261
32.000 *.487.328
816232834145 CENTRAL5 MARGINAL
;
l263521
14
99
.007
.3417.7216.7314.263.053
5.268.000.035
32.000
3.03.87.99.07.00.26.56.00.18.96
t***t***
24.421*
.819
.450
4.01
1.7430.3531.2220.76
.2714.67
.00
.2599.27
.002 *
.315 *8.606 *5.939 *4.178 *.055 *
5.262 *.000 *.048 24.405
32.000 *.804.446
5.00
1.1925.8238.8618.06
.1715.20
.00
.2699.56
.000 *
.218 *7.396 *7.468 *3.671 *.035 *
5.507 *.000 *.051 24.346
32.000 *.673.402
6.10.75
37.1427.1416.79
.2017.56
.00
.2899.96
.023 *
.129 *10.018 *4.912 *3.214 *.039 *
5.991 *.000 *.052 24.377
32.000 *.543.352
7
13.53.20.
,
11.
,
100.
.003
.0534.228
11.0274.516.077
4.386.000.025
32.000
01278480833535001257
t*ltt*t*
24.314*
1.047.512
8.03.29
12.4952.8521.27
.3811.20
.00
.1698.67
.008
.0583.918
11.1254.736.086
4.445.000.034 24
32.0001.
tt*****t.409t
085520
ZONE W INCL
CHROMITE, R. DILLMAN, October 15 1999, R.L.B.
9 10 SI02 .00 .00TI02 .12 .02A203 16.93 17.95C203 54.85 52.83FED 13.07 14.48MNO .24 .261160 15.02 14.49ZNO .00 .00NIO .15 .14SUM 100.38 100.17
SI .000 * .000 *TI .022 * .004 *AL 4.956 * 5.269 *CR 10.773 * 10.404 *FE 2.715 * 3.016 *MN .051 * .055 *MG 5.562 * 5.380 . *ZN .000 * .000 *NI .030 24.109 .028 24.1560 32.000 * 32.000 *
F/M .497 .571F/FM .332 .363
9 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN 610 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN 1511 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN 18 MAIN GRAIN12 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN 18 LINEAR ZONE13 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN 2214 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN 2415 SAMPLE GC-13 GRAIN 916 SAMPLE GC-13 GRAIN 13
11 .00.04
14.4346.5936.891.031.03.30.13
100.44
.000 *
.008 *4.756 *10.302 *8.628 *.244 *.429 *.062 *'.029 24.459
32.000 *20.663
.954
W INCL
12 .00.14
8.6744.9942.951.22.76.24.22
99.19
.000 *
.031 *3.046 *
10.604 *10.708 *
.308 *
.338 *
.053 *
.053 25.14132.000 *
32.620.970
13 .00.17
16.7353.9215.28
.2913.59
.00.19
100.17
.000 *
.032 *4.959 *
10.723 *3.214 *.062 *
5.095 *.000 *.038 24.123
32.000 *.643.391
14 .02.53
13.9552.7923.66
.388.85.00.23
100.41
.005 *
.105 *4.326 *10.984 *5.207 *.085 *
3.471 *.000 *.049 24.232
32.000 *1.524.604
15 .00.21
17.7653.8013.34
.2314.61
.00
.14100.09
.000 *
.039 *5.201 *
10.571 *2.772 *.048 *
5.412 *.000 *.028 24.071
32.000 *.521.343
16
17.53.13.
.
14.,
,
99.
.000
.0325.254
10.4772.900.044
5.370.000.020
32.000
00178711902144001080
***t*t*t
24.099*
.548
.354
CHROMITE, R. OILLHftN, October 15 1999, R.L.B.
SI02TI02A203C203FEOMNOMGOZ NONIOSUM
SIIIAlCRFEMNMGINNI0
17.00.16
15.6348.9525.82
.388.18.02.09
99.23
.000 *
.032 *4.906 * 110.309 * 145.752 * '.086 *
3.248 * i.004 *.019 24.357
32.000 * 3;F/M 1.797F/FM .643
17 SAMPLE GC-13 GRAIN 16
CHROMITE - R. DILLMAN GC-2 (Sept. 26 1999)
70
60
d60M
Q40
10
l 1 f l J 1 1 1 1
Diamond Inclusion Field
Ooo
1 l l l l l l l l . l l l l l l l l
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 2O
wt ** MgO
RLB
CHROMITE - R. DILLMAN GC-7 (Sept. 26 1999)
70Diamond Inclusion Field
60
d60M6*0
#30
10
O
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
wt ** MgO
RLB
CHROMITE - R. DILLMAN GC-9 (Sept. 26 1999)
70
60
d60
10
i ' i ' i Diamond Inclusion FtelcJ
o
l l L l l l l l l l l l l l ill
4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Wt ** MgO
o RLB
CHROMITE - R. DILLMAN GC-13 (Sept. 26 1999)
70
60
M
Q40
#30
10
i l l | r j t \
Diamond inclusion Field
li li 111! l l l i
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Wt ** MgO
o RLB
ECL-PYROPE, R. DILLMAN, October 15 1999, R.L.
SI02TI02A203C203FEOMGDMHOGAONA20SUM
SIALALTICRFEMNMGCANA0
1737.
21.
25.3.1,
10.
100.
5.973.027
3.887.015.000
3.409.168.815
1.753.009
24.000F/HF/FM
99131300934826410336
*
6.000*******
10.057*
4.386.814
17 SAMPLE GC-2 GRAIN 40
ECL-PVROPE, R. DILLMAN, October 15 1999, R.L.B.
9SI02 37.31TI02 .01A203 22.46C203 .04FED 31.53MGO 4.43MHO 3.61CAO 1.12NA20 .03SUM 100.54
SI 5.905AL .095 6AL 4.093TI .001CR .005FE 4.173MN .484MG 1.045CA .190NA .009 100 24.000
F/M 4.F/FM
9 SAMPLE GC-710 SAMPLE GC-711 SAMPLE GC-712 SAMPLE GC-913 SAMPLE GC-914 SAMPLE GC-915 SAMPLE GC-9
1037.
22.,
31.6.1.1.
,
99.
* 5.924.000 .076* 4.082* .006* .011* 4.094* .172* 1.424* .189.000 .012* 24.000
456817
GRAIN 41GRAIN 44GRAIN 45GRAIN 63GRAIN 64GRAIN 69GRAIN 70
70054509150829120497
*6.000
****
. ***
9.989*
2.995.750
1138.
,
23.
25.10.
1.,
100.
5.902.098
4.046.006.011
3.233.084
2.308.319.012
24.000
84051409441965960440
*6.000
t*tt***
10.018*
1.437.590
1238.25
.1521.96
.0625.466.561.016.93.07
100.45
5.921 *.079 6.000
3.927 *.017 *.007 *
3.296 *.132 *
1.514 *1.149 *.021 10.064
24.000 *2.265.694
1338.
22.,
30.6.1.1.
100.
5.944.056
4.012.005.006
4.030.166
1.550.236.012
24,000
00040705816525410432
t6.000
*t*****
10.018*
2.706.730
1437.65
.1321.27
.1026.364.501.988.11.08
100.18
5.928 *.072 6.000
3.875 *.015 *.012 *
3.471 *.264 *
1.056 *1.368 *.024 10.087
24.000 *3.537.780
1538.
22.,
24.8.
6.
100.
5.890.110
3.969.009.006
3.079.104
1.8421.044.006
24.000
45086005040780360247
*6.000
tt****r
10.059*
1.728.633
1638.26
.0522.68
.0728.768.36.81.83.04
99.86
5.928 *.072 6.000
4.068 *.006 *.009 *
3.726 *.106 *
1.931 *.138 *.012 9.996
24.000 *1.985.665
16 SAMPLE GC-13 GRAIN 20
any0*0
l frl 21 01 8 9 f Z i
O
)OO'O
-OZ'O
-OKO
-09*0 ^08*0 **
-OO'lHO -Ofr'i. ro
-09H
08' t
-i*i*s) zNVNTlia 'd - 13NUVD 011100103
ECLOGITIC GARNET - R. DILLMAN GC-2 (Sept. 26 1999)
o(Ncd
#
*
u.zv
0.18-
0.16-0.14-
0.12
0.10-
0.08
0.06-0.04-
O.O2-
0.00 C
O
1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1
) 2 4 6 8 1O 12 14 1
wt ** CaO
RLB
GARNET - R. DILLMAN GC-2 (Sept. 26 1999}
O 1 2 3 4 S 7 a 9 10 11 18 13 14 15 li 17 It 19 iO
wt CaO
RLB
ECLOGITIC GARNET - R. DILLMAN GC-7 (Sept. 26 1999)
z.vu
1.80-
1.60-
04 1.40-
P 1.20-
1.00-
0.80-
* 0.60-
0.40-
O.20-
0.00 C
^ ^* 2 4 6 8 1O 12 14 1
wt ** CaO
RLB
wt
**
Na2
O
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
o
3D
OD
Nk
-
O)
-
o tt o
IO
00 o
m
O fi -*i O
p* m
10l
w o
Sr
GARNET - R. DILLMAN GC-7 (Sept. 26 1999)
RLB
wt
Na2
Oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
10 l*0*0)010*0*010
10
-
03
m o fi *0 O
09
-
o 0 o
** m
A
l
GARNET - R. DILLMAN QC-9 (Sept. 26 1999)
o RLB
ECLOGITIC GARNET - R. DILLMAN GC-9 (Sept. 2e 1999)
z.uu
1.80-
1.60-
CM 1.40-
j2 1.20-
1.00-
^ 0.80
* 0.60-
0.40-
0.2O-
0.00C
o o1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1
) 2 4 6 8 1O 12 14 1
wt ** CaO
RLB
ECLOGITIC GARNET - R. DILLMAN GC-13 (Sept. 26 1999)
z.uu
1.80-
1.60-
04 1.40-
P 1.20-
1.00-
*- 0.80-
^ 0.60-
0.40-
0.20-
0.00 C
oy 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1
wt *K CaO
o RLB
ECLOGITIC GARNET - R. DILLIIAN GC-13 (Sapt. 26 1999)
oCM CO
HK
u.zu
0.18-
0.16-0.14-
0.12-
0.10-
0.08-
0.06-
0.04-
0.02-
n AA
0
6 8 1O 12 14 16
wt X* CaO
RLB
GARNET - R. DILLMAN GC-13 (Sept. 26 1999)
wt *. CaO
RLB
CLINOPYROXENE, R. DILLMAN, October 15 1999, R.L,B.
SIU2T 102A203C203FEDMGDH NOCAUK20NAiOSUM
SI jALALT IGR ;F'E
MGMNGANAK
0 6F/HF/FM
1453.24
.051.40.13
7,7816.05
.1921.12
.02
.49100.47
.961 *
.039 2.000
.022 *
.001 *
.004 *,240 *.881 *.006 *.634 *.035 *.001 2.023.000 *
.279
.218
1553.68
.00
.66
.036.45
14.64.10
24.40.02.50
100.48
1.982 *.018 2,000.011 *.000 *.001 *.199 *.806 *.003 *.965 *.036 *.001 2.022
6.000 *.251.201
1653.21
.05
.93
.357.19
14.59.21
22.37.01.92
99.83
1.979 *.021 2.000.019 *.001 *.010 *.224 *.809 *,007 *.891 *.066 *.000 2.028
6.000 *.285.222
14 SftMPLE GC-? GRAIN 315 SAMPLE 6C-7 GRAIN 516 SAMPLE GC-7 GRAIN 6
CLINOPYROXENE, R. DILLMAN, October 15 1999, R.L.8.
SI02TI02A203C203FEDMGOUNOGAOK20NA20SUM
SIflLALTICRFEMGMNCANAK0
1753.44
.02
.47
.036.11
14.73.20
24.73.03.55
100,31
1.979 *.021 1.999.000 *.001 *.001 *.189 *.813 *.006 *.981 *.039 *.001 2.032
6.000 *F/M .240F/FM .194
1853.94
.04
.92
.035.65
14.59.17
24.05.02.61
100,02
1.991 *.009 2.000.031 *.001 *.001 *.174 . *.803 *.005 *.951 *.044 *.001 2.010
6.000 *.224.183
1951.30
.173.26.17
9,5913.96
.1520.80
.02
.66100.08
1.915 *.085 2.000.059 *.005 *.005 *.299 *.777 *.005 *.832 *.048 *.001 2.030
6.000 *.392.281
2053,42
.221.40.79
4.5417.27
.0721.75
.03
.55100,04
1.954 *.046 2,000.014 *.006 *.023 *.139 *.942 *.002 *.852 *.039 *.001 2.019
6.000 *.150.130
2153.18
.461.491.005.99
18.14.13
19.08.03.47
99.97
1.946 *.054 2.000.010 *.013 *.029 *.183 *.990 *.004 *.748 *.033 *.001 2.012
6.000 *.189.159
2254.04
.081.42.44
4.5915.45
.1523.27
.02
.73100.19
1.979 *.021 2.000.040 *.002 *.013 *.141 *.843 *.005 *.913 *.052 *.001 2.009
6.000 *.172.147
2353.77
.081.17.22
6.1414.80
.2523.39
.04
.64100.50
1.978 *.022 2.000.029 *.002 *.006 *.189 *.811 *.008 *.922 *.046 *.002 2.015
6.000 *.242.195
2453.70
.091.12.22
6.1415.43
.1922.61
.03
.60100.13
1.978 *.022 2.000.027 *.002 *.006 *.189 *.847 *.006 *.892 *.043 *.001 2.014
6.000 *.230.187
17 SAMPLE 6C-7 GRAIN 818 SAMPLE GC-7 GRAIN 1219 SAMPLE GC-7 GRAIN 1320 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN 3721 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN 3822 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN 3923 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN 4024 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN 41
CLINOPYROXENE, R. DILLMAN, October 15 1999, R.L.B.
SI02TI02A203 C203FEDHGO HNOGAO K20 NA20SUM
SIAL ALIICRFEMGMNCANAK0
2553.10
.061.12 .06
7.27 -13.81
.1723.72
.02
.70100.03
1.976 *.024 2.000 .025 *.002 *.002 *.226 *.766 *.005 *.946 *.050 *.001 2.023
6.000 *F/M .302F/FM .232
2653.73
.03
.73
.006.37
14.42 .19
23.84 .01.60
99.92
1.991 *.009 2.000 .023 *.001 *.000 *.197 *.796 *.006 *.947 *.043 *.000 2.014
6.000 *.255.203
2752.91
.032.26 .13
7.0414.36
.2222.96
.03
.54100.48
1.952 *.048 2.000 .050 *.001 *.004 *.217 *.790 *.007 *.908 *.039 *.001 2.016
6.000 *.284.221
2853.24
.011.27 .26
6.7615.03
.2322.93
.02
.50100.25
1.967 *.033 2.000 .023 *.000 *.008 *.209 *.828 *.007 *.908 *.036 *.001 2.019
6.000 *.261.207
2953.81
.021.58 .00
5.6114.78
.2323.71
.02
.74100.50
1.975 *.025 2.000 .043 *.001 *.000 *.172 *.808 *.007 *.932 *.053 *.001 2.017
6.000 *.222.182
3053.33
.041.46 .01
5.7214.74
.2524.27
.02
.59100.43
1.965 *.035 2.000 .028 *.001 *
' .000 *.176 *.809 *.008 *.958 *.042 *.001 2.024
6.000 *.227.185
3154.37
.00
.62
.054 00 . oz
16.06 .20
23.65 .03 .52
100.32
1.990 *.010 2.000 .017 *.000 *.001 *.148 *.876 *.006 *.928 *.037 *.001 2.015
6.000 *.175.149
25 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN 4226 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN 4427 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN 4528 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN 4629 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN 4730 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN 4831 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN 49
Q
CHROME DIOPSIDE - R. DILLMAN GC-7 (Sept. 26 1999)
o.u4.5-
4.0-
a o-.V
2 f-.9
2.0-
1.5-
1.0-
0.5-
A n
-i
y
^
\
)
X
— — " r~
(\1
N
\\
V
\ \.^
0
^^
n
^
-^\
Ajt. ^*rs?
1C 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
wt CaO
o RLB
o
CLINOPYROXENE - R. DILLMAN GC-7 (Sept. 26 1999)
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2 '0
1.0
0.0o
0.0 1.O 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
wt
RLB
Na tO
CHROME DIOPSIDE - R. DILLMAN GC-9 (Sept. 26 1999)
o.u4.5-
4.0-
w as-Q 3.5
W 4 |*.1^ 3.U
0 2.5-
^^P* ft f±r 2.0
"J 1.5-1.0-
0.5-
n f\
-i
y
'
\
)
/
K-" ————
_____ ̂
~- ~^.
(\
)
N
\\
k.
\.\K
^.
s^
o-
l\,t'
oiVf**
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
wt CaO
RLB
ox
CLINOPYROXENE - R. DILLMAN GC-9 (Sept. 26 1999)
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
OO
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.O
Wt
o RLB
NatO
ILMENITE, R. DILLHAN, October 15 1999, R.L,8.
SI02TI02A203C203FEOMNOMGOZNONION205SUM
SITIfitCRFEMNMGZNNINB0
1.00
50.82.37.15
39.61.39
8.18.00.12.07
99.71
.000 *9.935 *.113 *.031 *
8.612 *.086 *
3.170 *.000 *.025 *.008 21.980
32.000 *F/M 2.744F/FM .733
2.00
50.52.41.00
41.32.49
6.87.00.13.00
99.74
.000 *9.963 *.127 *.000 *
9.062 *.109 *
2.685 *.000 *.027 *.000 21.973
32.000 *3.415.774
3.00
50.46.46.00
41.01.50
7.16.00.14.03
99.76
.000 *9.933 *.142 *.000 *
8.978 *.111 *
2.794 *.000 *.029 *.004 21.990
32.000 *3.253.765
4.00
50.64.44.00
41.56.47
7.15.00.07.00
100.33
.000 *9.923 *.135 *.000 *
9.056 *.104 *
2.777 *.000 *.015 *.000 22.010
32.000 *3.299.767
5.00
49.54.54.05
41.59.40
7.33.00.07.14
99.66
.000 *9.789 *.167 *.010 *
9.139 *.089 *
2.871 *.000 *.015 *.017 22.097
32.000 *3.215.763
6.00
52.31.02
3.2033.28
.4410.45
.00
.22
.38100.30
.000 *9.920 *.006 *.638 *
7.019 *.094 *
3.928 *.000 *.045 *.043 21.693
32.000 *1.811.644
1 SAMPLE GC-7 GRAIN 272 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN l3 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN 24 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN 105 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN 146 SAMPLE GC-9 GRAIN 19
ILMENITE - R. DILLMAN GC-7 (Sept. 26 1999)
109
8
r 7*- 6 O
5*4**
* 3
21
lO l li li l l l t l . l !
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
wt % MgO
RLB
U)OCM
ILMEKITE - R. DILLMAN GC-7 (Sept. 26 1999)
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0O 2 4 6 8 101214161820
wt MgO
o RLB
ILMENITE - R. DILLMAN GC-9 (Sept. 26 1999)
toOeaZ
#
?
U.0
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
rt rt
-
"
O
-
-
o
o
O 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Wt
o RLB
MgO
ILMENITE - R. DILLMAN GC -9 (Sept. 26 1999)
109
8** 77O
^6 O
5 *4
? 3
2
1
04 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 2O 22
wt ** MgO
RLB
Mr. R. Dillinan, October 15 1999, R. J. Dillinan Geological Services, 8901 Reily Drive, RR 5, Mount Brydges, NOL 1WO
Ph/Fax 1-519-264-9278
R. L. Barnett Geological Consulting Inc., 9684 Longwoods Road, RR 32, London, Ontario. N6P 1P2
Ph. 1-519-652-1498 Fax 1-519-652-1475
Dear Robert,
The identity of "non-indicator" minerals in samples A-3,GC- 2,OC-7,6C-9,GC-13,OG-4, received Septenfloer 26 1999, for which analyses were not provided is:
GC-2 grains 1-5,9,11,14,19,24-26,29,30,35-37 - simple ilmenite 6,17 - rutile7,10,12,13,18,20,21,27,32,33 - magnetite 15 anphibole 22 - Ti-magnetite 31,38 - tourmaline 39 - almandine41 - zircon42 - spessartine almandine ss
GC-7 grains 1,16 - amphibole2,10,11,17 - epidote 15,18,20,22,24, - andradite 4,35,36 - apatite21 - rutile22 - melanite25 - simple ilmenite28 f 29 - Fe opx30 -Mn Ilmenite31 - zircon32,34,37-39 - quartz33 - grossular40 - almandine42,43 - spessartine almandine ss
OC-9 grains 3 - perovskite 4,9,31 - rutile8,11-13,28,29,34,35,36, - simple ilmenite 16,20,23,26,32,33 - melanite 17 - Nb rutile 21,54,55 - amphibole 30 -- tourmaline 43,51,58 - epidote 50,53 - apatite 56,59 - quartz 57,60 - plagioclase61,62,65-68,72 - spessratine almandine ss 71 - almandine
GC-13 grains 2,12,15,17,18,19 - simple ilmenite 3,10 - melanite 5,8,11 - rutile
Sincerely,
R. L. Barnett
FROM: R.L. BfiRNETT GEOLOQ, FfiX NO.: 513 6 5 J Mi'3 02-12-08
SI02T 102A203C20JFEDHSUNOCftQX?0NA20SOU
SIAtAlIICRFEUSUNCftHAK5
53.15.09.86.05
8.0213.24
,452J.J5
.Di
.t.699.90
1.987 *.01 J 2.000.025 *.003 '.00) *.251 *.738 *.014 *.935 *.048 *.001 2.0U
6.000 *F /H .359F/FH .264
CLINOPYROXENE, R. DILLEN, KAP, February [4 2000, S.L.6.
9 SftKPU 6C22 QRAIN
F -": O M s R . U . B fi R N t" T 1 13 E O L O G , " H i'1 H O . J ci l 'i 6 5 l 1473
eiLUWN, nw, Fwrwry H zooo, s.l.B.
S3 02T i 02WC 3C203ffOMIO(TOmHIOSUM
SiTIAtCRF f.UNiff.fHHI0
7,7,3.
i
1?,F/HF/fN
1
1.24.J9,K.
.
17.
9V.
02T308018469235057208043062000
0970ag150328262432.'5
t*J*St1i
24.422j
.530
.347
.101.41
30.1735. W15,10
.17l'/, 58
.19
.22100.50
.02} *
.247e. m4.5402.94;
.054d. 114
.OW.041 24.296
3?. 000 *.487.328
;
J33215
17
100
.W.158
9.0995.878i. 041
.0276,006
.036,0b(i
32.000
S 1091tt1271.U412130U
ttttt**t
24.325t
.5,11
.338
4.02,S7
13. 9757. H20,62
.3211,62
.24
.199M9
.005 *J70 *
4.281 *10.720 *4.484 *
.070 *4:504 *.646 *.040 24. Wl
32.000 *1.011
.503
c
165315
14
100
.ojo
.0434.907
j 0.6093,235
.051U66
.035
.MS3J.OOO
04236255442*10191455
24
ttttttf*
.165i
u24384
1 SAUK t GC22 GRfUN l2 SAMPLE 5C22 8RSIN 7j SAMPLE SC22 GflftJN 54 SflflPLf HC22 WIN S5 SAUK, f SCZJ, tWNf 10
FROM: R, L. SflRNETT GEOLOQ. F fi'A HO . 652 l4?5
ItHUUH, R- DUlHftN, HAP, February 14 2QQO, R.U.
SI02 TIQ2 A203C20JFEDHKOmm mN205mSIuftl'"B*n
ftMN MG ZH NI Hi 0
12i45
1 .91
49,30 .55.13
41.7?.60
7.04 .41 .09.00
9?J2
,COJ * 9,785 '
.109 l.027 l
9.222 '.134 *
2.769 * .080 i .019 * .000 22.146
32.000 t f /H 3,3?9 F/FK .772
mm se H anAiNSfiMfU M22 SRAlhSAKPLC 8C2? 8Rh!HSAHPLE 6?22 8WINSAHPLE 6C22 GRAIN
2.00
47.41 .21
IM39.0?
.2S9,01
.37.14,.25
97.45
.000 * 9.393 *
.068 * .521 *
8.577 *Mf, *
1.523 * .072 * .OJO * .030 22,268
32.000 * 2.450
.710
811UU17
I.CI
47.79 .38.14
44.00In
. 07
6.67 .25 .20 .05
SS.88
.003 * 9,567 J
.119 * .029 *
•9.794 *.088 *
2.647 * .049 * .04! ' .006 22.347
32.000 * 3.734
.789
4.00
49. 57 .44.00
4Q,39 .48
7,5? .35.11 .10
93.94
.000 * 9.343 *
.137 t .000 *
8.919 *.107 *
2.960 '.m *.023 * .012 22.070
32.000 * 3. OJO
.753
5.00
49.29.35 ,10
i . ftn41.17
.437.42
.29
.12
.0099.34
.000 9.788
.109 .021
9.119.101
2,921 .057 .025 .000 22
32.000 i.
tt
.147 t
159 VJ
tt Him ZZD5 13 NIW JZOS JlifUWS L OZ HIWI5 2Z39 Him 9 9 NIWUS 61D9 JldHtt 5 E NW8 6135 JldUW t
6103 HdWHS f M) JldWS 2
T
960'901'
s 0009tOO 'Z 000'
t 620't 168'* 100't It6't 660'i 6ZO'i 010'* 000'
866-1 iZO't Wt
it'OOlit-io1iO'ftZ20'wii92 'S OO'l
STflfoft?
8
601'221-
s 000'9ZIO'Z 000'
t OSO't U8'* 000'i Ot6'* sirs 610't Wt 000'
866' 1 /.Zfl-t U6'l
iO'OOIZf 10'
wu 00'f Z L\9i't
9929If00 'K
i
HO'
tor1 000 '9
600'Z 100'6ZB'906'209'
WM"ZZO"uo-
t 000'f66'l 020'
* iii'I
80 '001IfZO'
90TZSO'SfilSITirO'61'
SZ'VS9
660'Oil'
* 000'9600 '2 000' tfO'
818'zoo-9*6'
wr ZZO'800'tOO'
OOO'Z SJO-t Sli't
If 001Sf 10'
8! '22 90'U'il
Iff9i'99"
ortt 'H
S
i 80'960'
l 000'9Jlfl't 000' 920'
t06'000'W6'J60'020'iOO'000'
f 66 'I 810't 6i6'I
9f'C01Of00'M'K10'
08' il20T89'
IftZ-'tS'W
^
HO'
tar* 000'9
iOO'I 000' 810'
tw100'St6't60'tfO'
* 600't 300'
666*1 JZO't LL(,'l
6M)flltS'to'69'2220'
it'llOZTSI'1
STzrtf t?
t
satr {60'
t 090-9210'Z 000'
t OJO'•016'000'IS6'680"810'(00'
0(50*866 '1 ilO'
t I86'I
Of 001ft'10'
Of f Z10'
89'il26'Z*9"
Of9Z'
SS'tS2
980' MMHO' H/it flOO'9
IZO'2 000't JO't06'200"456'880'920'800"000"
J66'l til!)'t m-i
52 '0018f IC'
SI'tZ9C"
69'ilU'226"
tf62"
92 'tSI
0*
WKNW5k3HS3li11)'
1WIE
MSOWN
02*twoONWOSH01J
f02Df02WZOUZOIS
'8'VII 'OOOZ M'HDtiHKl 'M 'i
:@' J6 ' S : ' C N X y d'901029 J i 3 H S d 9il if J
F !\ O CI : S.L. B M R M c T T G E O L O fi . r fi ,i NO.; 5 ! 5 652 l 4 7 5 81-12-08 0 2 :S 5 P F .l 5
10
98
r r
ILMENITE KAR ~ GC22
R. DILLMAN (Nov. 17 1339)
4
3
21
O J-—J——l——i——l——i,,., i, 8 10 12 14
wt ** MgO
18 2O 22
RLB
F K Ci r i R. L. BARNETT G E CI LOG. NO.; 519 632 1475 :' - l 2 - O t) e 2 - t 5 P P.I 2
10
9
8** Vo 7
^6 O
5*4
13
21O
ILMENITE KAP - GC19
R. DILLMAN (NOV. 17 1999)
10
wt
14 18 20 22
MgO
RLB
f R O r. : R , L . 6 Fi R N S. ~ T b E O L O b . ' ft fi N d . : 5 l S t 5 2 M ' 5 32-12-30 O 2 : J 3 F 1 F.8 d
70
*0
10
CHROMITE - R, DILLMAN KAR - GC22 (NOV. 17 1999)
J——t L
RLB
Diamond InoknOon FkwkJ
l,,., .-j,,
8 10
wt ** MgO
Oo o
16 18 20
F R O f. : R . L. . 6 h R h t r T Q c. O L O G . f- fi X rt O . s 5 J S 652 o; -1 2 - j B ei:-J P F . e;
CLINOPYROXENE - R. DILLMAN KAR - GC 2 2 (Nov. 17 1999)6.0
6.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Oe
0.0 1.0 20 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
wt ** Na.O
^ RLB
R.L. 6 h R N i! l T GEUL US. F fi X NO.: 5 l '5 652 l 4 P 5 F .1)6
o fc
5,0
4.5
4.0
8.5
3.0
2.6
1.5
1.0
0.5
0,0
CHROME DIOPSIDE - R. DILLMAN KAR - GC22 (Nov. 17 1999)
V
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 20
wt 16 CaO
RLB
r R i H'; f-; , L . 6 H R N t " l b t O L O G . F H X MO.; 5 i 9 652 M 7 "j 02-12-9(5 Ci 2 . " i' P F,O!
CLINOPYROXENE - R. DILLMAN KAP - GC19 (NOV. 17 1999)6.0
6.0
PL 4-06
3.0
2.0
1.0
O.*
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
wt ** Na aO
o RLB
wt
Cr2
03
OO
~*™
*fc
2*3
t**a
4k
.0
kQ
Ic
o N̂S ea * ffi "
i !!
# I! 09
O
- j
Ci
*O
K o 10 10 M M
l d "
j e lM
C
:
t
X ' oI
-lt^" ^^
) O \ \ y -#~
K e
^. h /J ^
ft Q
r^^' X
n c
^-^ ^
* 9
\ -^
\
ff
i C
\ \̂ -~
^x ^
> Q
^— — ^ ——
S Cy
5^
A
5|
. o
1 S
0 0
* S 5
-* m S
' 9
^ g • i
SI
^^JJ
^^™
.i r ; K , L . if h K N t : l u c u L u b . in:- : 5 6 P P .
rtf. R, DillsMua,R. J, Dillronn Geological Services,8901 Rally Drive,RK 5, Mount Brydgiea,NOL 1WO
Ph/Fax 1-519-264-9278
R. li. Bamott Q*cio^rical ConsxiltAng Inc., 9684 Longwooda Road, RR 32, London, Ontario. N6P
February 14, 2000
Fb- 1-519-652-31498 Fax 1-519-652-1475
Dear Robert,
i40ntity of "Biota-iudiomtQi'1 mineral*, lo tb* KAP **npl** OO and GC, racAlved Hov*aab*r 17, 1999, for whicfc aaady*** w*r* not provicUfd, i*;
OC19 grain 3 - aoait*3 -
ain- 4,14,15 -
grain w ———-grain 19 - ooruxtdunigrain 24 - quartz
R. L.
Ontario ana MinesDeclaration of Assessment Work Performed on Mining Land
Mining Act, Subsection 65(2) and 66(3), R.S.0.1990
Transaction Numbfet idffics V&ft} UOOOCo O -Assessment Files Research Imagingf-- /f.
JtfccctecfcnshauHbedrectedtoaPiovhciallYir^
42G02NW2005 2.20389 ECCLESTONE QQQ
Instructions: - For work performed on Crown Lands before recording a claim, use form 0240. - Please type or print in ink.
1. Recorded holder(s) (Attach a list if necessary)
RECEIVED
JUN 1 5 2000AM
Address Ac-TbM Avf-
A73//Name
Address
Client Number
Telephone Number
JUN 1 5 2000 Fax Number
GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICE - 10 f
2. Type of work performed: Check (v^) and report on only ONE of the following groups for this declaration.
Geotechnical: prospecting, surveys, n assays and work under section 18 (regs) u
Physical: drilling stripping, trenching and associated assays D Rehabilitation
Work Type
i rO j T t-OTl \)(j\ •'-^ W f 4
Dates Work From ,
Performed | f)^Bay | Monthf/p j Y
Global Positioning System Data (if available)
\J L/ V\A 1 * 1 f^ /J f\ J i W- |M Pi J m ) S~'j ••^l/A./r i\*rC* ^f\ f if cx/A/i ^
\To
ear ^ " OayU [ | MontVw | Year ^66(5
Township/Area ^-^ . ^ ^ .tC^c.^/0/Ut TiJP,
M or G-Plan Number .^ y* ^\
6' 067
Office Use
Commodity
Total S Value of ^ 0 Work Claimed ^ 1 o, Oi l
NTS Reference
Mining Division f (?2 CAJ. /z**-*-
Resident Geologist , . District
Please remember to: - obtain a work permit from the Ministry of Natural Resources as required;- provide proper notice to surface rights holders before starting work;- complete and attach a Statement of Costs, form 0212;- provide a map showing contiguous mining lands that are linked for assigning work;- include two copies of your technical report.
3. Person or companies who prepared the technical report (Attach a list if necessary)
Name Tetephone Number
Address Fax Number
Name Telephone Number
Address Fax Number
4. Certification by Recorded Holder or Agents\
l, Hf fcO Qj( t do hereby certify that l have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in(Print Name)
this Declaration of Assessment Work having caused the work to be performed or witnessed the same during or after its completion and, to the best of my knowledge, the annexed report is true.
edfioldar or Agent S
0241 (03/97)
RECEIVEDJUN 1 5 2000
GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT ___ OFFICE
Ontario Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Schedule for Declaration of Assessment Work on Mining Land
o P.
Transaction Number (office use)
2 .20389
Mining Claim Number. Or if work was done on other eligible mining land, show in this column the location number indicated on the claim map.
l
"L
V
V
s^b v
fl
I22^qft^1227. WO12.27.^1
I2^2.WI
(222^3
i.2 ^/OO/-r —
Col
Number of Claim Units. For other mining land, list hectares.
Hp
Ifr
(^
(6
16^
i— i ^
12-0
umn Totals
Value of work performed on this claim or other mining land.
30O2
loo 2
3002,3CD2
3c302,
300 |
Value of work applied to this claim.
-2.-2.OO
22002.2.00
2,200
22031ZOO
—————— ^
1*5,^0(0
Value of work assigned to other mining claims.
l : IOf?™
RECEIV— JUM 1 5 20(
EOSCIENCE ASSESOFFICE
Bank. Value of work to be distributed at a future date.
902.&0-2-
go-2.
fa-2.
tiOT-&0 l
?D0 ——SM6W —————
f 8 li
0290(02/96)
© /'•N.-J. ̂ •—L Minisiryof Statement of Costs I tinTZlirtf^ Northern Development , — ,. V-/I ILOI lv/ and Mines for Assessment Credit
Transaction Number (office use)
Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of subsection 6 ( 1 ) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96. Under section 8 of the Mi This information will be used to review the assessment work and correspond with the mining land holder. Questions about this collection should be directed to a F Northern Development and Mines 3rd Floor, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 6B5. TV . ~ '~~ -\ f~-
t". , . . ' , *-- - . -f ~'
Work Type
^1 A jtf l^/ /~ f S\ J / t /* ̂ t tG**\' * * t—fl— l^S l-S~^-ST-A^ t //J *\S
^ArtfLf PRoc^i^PETROLOGY
tLf-cXkati MitfoPME 'HilF• C ^*r ILX K. t
Units of workDepending on the type of work, list the number of hour worked, metres of drilling, kilometres of grid line, numb samples, etc.
4 DM 3/^AJ ^SM/%48 5XM^5"5f? M)4J^'0-5" f/tfw^H DAY*,
Associated Costs (e.g. supplies, mobilization and demobilization).
rt ' (J K fc A/Pt^
RECEIVED—— JUN 1 5 2000 ——GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMEN"
Transportation Co: ts OFFICE
TRuf^Z ^. 3^5^ /fc*j
Food and Lodging Costs
T^OC)
|-fo7e^
./days Cost Per Unit srof of work
t/fo/OW/M/HO
" b^/^ftrtpLZ
V^o/tfoutf/Oj/Hout*"S10 /O4f
'W IDA*
I'lOprA
&O- tb/kofit
Total Value of Assessment Work
Total Cost
V^5"0
1)1*2-0
HBoomy
f
18^
lOO^f-
I2-15~
q^I3,0li
Calculations of Filing Discounts:
1. Work filed within two years of performance is claimed at lOO'Hi of the above Total Value of Assessment Work.2. If work is filed after two years and up to five years after performance, it can only be claimed at 50"Xo of the Total
Value of Assessment Work. If this situation aoolies to vour claims, use the calculation below:
Declaration of Work form as(recorded holder, agent or state company position with signing authority)
l am authorized to make this certification
Signature
Ministry of Mlnistere duNorthern Development Developpement du Nordand Mines et des Mines Ontario
Geoscience Assessment Office 933 Ramsey Lake Road
July 11, 2000 6th FloorSudbury, Ontario
GEORGE CHARLES SILVERMAN P3E 6B575 ACTON AVENUEDOWNSVIEW, Ontario Telephone: (888)415-9845M3H-4H2 Fax: (877)670-1555
Visit our website at: www.gov.on.ca/MNDM/MINES/LANDS/mlsmnpge.htm
Dear Sir or Madam: Submission Number: 2.20389
Status Subject: Transaction Number(s): W0060.00284 Approval
We have reviewed your Assessment Work submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached summary page(s) indicate the results of the review. WE RECOMMEND YOU READ THIS SUMMARY FOR THE DETAILS PERTAINING TO YOUR ASSESSMENT WORK.
If the status for a transaction is a 45 Day Notice, the summary will outline the reasons for the notice, and any steps you can take to remedy deficiencies. The 90-day deemed approval provision, subsection 6(7) of the Assessment Work Regulation, will no longer be in effect for assessment work which has received a 45 Day Notice. Allowable changes to your credit distribution can be made by contacting the Geoscience Assessment Office within this 45 Day period, otherwise assessment credit will be cut back and distributed as outlined in Section #6 of the Declaration of Assessment work form.
Please note any revisions must be submitted in DUPLICATE to the Geoscience Assessment Office, by the response date on the summary.
If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact JIM MCAULEY by e-mail at [email protected] or by telephone at (705) 670-5880.
Yours sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BYSteve B. BeneteauActing Supervisor, Geoscience Assessment OfficeMining Lands Section
Correspondence ID: 15048
Copy for: Assessment Library
Work Report Assessment Results
Submission Number: 2.20389
Date Correspondence Sent: July 11, 2000
General Comment:
Assessor:JIM MCAULEY
Transaction First Claim Number NumberW0060.00284 1222989
Section:17 Assays BENEF18 Other MICRO
Township(s) l Area(s)ECCLESTONE
StatusApproval
Approval Date
July 11, 2000
Correspondence to:Resident Geologist South Porcupine, ON
Assessment Files Library Sudbury, ON
Recorded Holder(s) and/or Agent(s):GEORGE CHARLES SILVERMAN DOWNSVIEW, Ontario
Page: 1Correspondence ID: 15048
CL
K-
enoUJi. L
F'ARNELL TWR
1236912
1237538
1237535 237532
J23I222 -
1237531
T^rL y^^ ~~f t~\ —J f~\j ^2323l l^j**/^ j* *S *-*, &&O t— -J ^
L-/-tj1 d
! 123I22BJ23I048 j
232397
o: Zh-
^j5 or <o
CM.
OPAZATIKA TWP BOURINOT TWR
LEGENDHIGHWAY AkiJ "KXJ TE No, OTHER ROADS TRAILS SURVEYED LINES:
TOWNSHIPS. BASE LI. T* ETCLOTS. MINING CLAIMS.
UNSUflVEYED LINES.LOT UN ESPARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLAIMS ETC
RAILWAY AM) RIGHT GF UTILITY LINES NON'PEHENNtAI STREAM FLOODING OD FLOODING RIGHT* SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLAN RESERVATIONS ORIGINAL jilOR EL l* IE MARSH OR Ml ISKEG MINES TRAVERSE MONUMENT
DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS
TYPL OF DOCUMENT SYMfOL
PATENT, SURFACE li M.N1NG RIGHTS_________ - A "' , SURFACE RIL, *TS ONLY______ .^^m. 9
" , MINING RIGHTS ONLY ____,______.___ OLEASE SURFACE tt MINING RIGHTS..___________ M
- .SLJHtAiJE NIGHTSONLY..^___ ______ E3- r MINIW! RIGHTS ONLY.———__________ D
LICENCE OF OCCUPATION ___.____________ V ORDER (N^MUNCIL ___ ______.___,..__ OC RESERVATION ________... .._____ Q
CANCELLED _______________._________ m
SANOftGHAVtL __,.-,.;_ , ___ .________ ft
Man: uiNiM4 HIOMTI IN r*ne*LA FATEMTIB PNKM TO WAV 4,VtlTCD IM OHIQIMAL PATINTlf t* TMl MlkLtC
ACT, NA.O. I*f*, tK**. M*. **C. U, *UMUl l.
AflfcAS WITHDRAWN
M.H.O. - MINISS ntGHTS ONLY
•.ft.D. -SURFACE RIGHTS OWL Y
M.+ t. - MINING AND SUKFACt RfGMTI
NOTES
TMH TWP. li SUBJECT TO FOREST ACTIVITY IN 1MB/M, FURTHCT (HfDRM*riON AVWLABLE ON FILE.
THE INFORMATION THAT APPEARS ON THIS MAP' HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES, AND ACCURACY IS NOT GUARANTEED- THOSE WISHING TO STAKE MIN ING CLAIMS SHOULD CON SUIT WITH THE MINING RECORDER. MINISTRY GF NORTHERN DEVELOP MENT AND MINES, FOR AP OIT1ONAL INFORMATION ON THE STATUS OF THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON.
SCALE: 1 INCH - 40 CHAINS
oUVTftl* M mtl {i tut
ACRES HECTARES
BTOWNSHIP OF
ECCLESTONEDISTRICT OF
COCHRANE MINING DIVISION
PORCUPINE
Ministry of Ministry ofNatural Ngrlhe*n DevelopmentRe.' ources and Mines
Ontario
JULY I9S..N*tH.*4l fopogriphic S* i** G-869
42G02NW2005 2.20389 ECCLESTONE 200
2*00 A
x w
LEGEND
Z 3. 7. -. W
Chromite Picroilmenite
Pyrope Chrome Diopside
Chrome Diopside (questionable source)
Kimberlite Mineral LocationSuspected Kimberlite Minerals (ISUc microprobe analyses)Barren Sample SiteGround Magnetic AnomalyArea of OutcropDiabaseGraniteMetasedimentary RockMafic Metavolcanic RockEskerGlacial Striation
l,000 metres
LOCATIONS OF KIMBERLITIE MINERALS DERIVED FROM HEAVY MINERALS CONCENTRATESCPX-3 -. -. -. 50?. 4-700
CPX-4 -. -. -. -. +10Q
CPX-5 -,-.-,-. +IOO KAP PROPERTYECCLESTONE TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO
GEMCAL PROSPECTING SYNDICATEKAP 3. -. L 50?. D-2
7.T.-.-.+1M?,
OGS590 MAP2000B JUNE 2000
SCALE 1:10,000 NTS: 42G DRAWN BY: RJD
42G02NW2005 2,20389 ECCLESTONE
360000 mE 360000 mE
J.DILLMW4 F 7031
FELLOW
LEGEND
2. 3. L -. 70
Chromite Picroilmenite
Pyrope Chrome Diopside
Chrome Diopside (questionable source)
W AC.RID
Kimberlite Mineral LocationSuspected Kimberlite Minerals (No microprobe analyses)Barren Sample SiteGround Magnetic AnomalyArea of OutcropDiabaseGraniteMetasedimentary RockMafic Metavolcanic RockEskerGlacial Striation
l,000 metres
LOCATIONS OF KIMBERLITE MINERALS DERIVED FROM HEAVY MINERAL CONCENTRATES
KAP PROPERTYECCLESTONE TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO
GEMCAL PROSPECTING SYNDICATE
SCALE 1:10,000MAP2000A JUNE 2000
NTS: 42G DRAWN BY: RJD
42G02NW2005 2.20389 ECCLESTONE