rope#1 presenting your career journey · f1‐2, f5, f9 personal details, qualifications populated...
TRANSCRIPT
Support program for ARC DECRA and FT:
ROPE#1 presenting your career journey
Identifier first line
•Second line
GaRDeN WebinarAugust 2020
Housekeeping – Zoom webinar• Please mute your mike
chat function to ask questions or raise issues
• Turn off you video during presentations
• Screen sharing View options (top of screen)
Zoom Ratio – suggest selecting "fit to window"
• There will be time for questions at the end of the presentations
• The session is being recorded2
Welcome
Session overview
Neil Owens, PhDSenior Research Development Coordinator, FBE
Prof Tom Wilkening (PhD, MIT)ARC Future Fellow (2018), ARC DECRA (2013)
Dr Kevin Staub (PhD, U. Zurich)Senior Lecturer, ARC DECRA (2017)
Jonathan O’DonnellSenior Research Initiative Coordinator, Science
Running sheet
Time Who Topic2:05‐10 5 Neil Welcome to the session
2:10‐2:20 10 Neil Overview ‐What is a ROPE?
2:20‐2:35 15 Neil;Tom, Kevin
How it is used? ‐ The Assessor’s perspective Specialist comments from assessors Kevin Staub (ARC DECRA) & Tom Wilkening (ARC FT)
2:35‐2:45 5+5
Kevin, Tom
Career disruptions
2:45‐3:00 15 What you wish you’d been told before I started the applicationKevin Staub, ARC DECRA, DECRA assessorTom Wilkening, current ARC Future Fellow, FT assessor
3:00‐3:20 20 Questions Audience Q&A
3:20‐3:25 5 Neil + Jonathan O’Donnell
What next?ROPE #2 – publications Shut up and write – Jonathan to describe
DECRA Future Fellow 1 Future Fellow 2 Future Fellow 3
Academic levels Any Level A or B Level C Level D or E
5
Reminder: What’s the difference?
DECRA Future Fellows 1 – 3
Years post PhD… 0 – 5 years 5 – 15 years
… plus career interruptions Time away from research, and taking care of children
Number of attempts 2 3
Number of fellowships 200 100
Length 3 years 4 years
ARC funding Salary + $50,000 per annum Salary + $60,000 per annum
Establishment grant Speak to your Faculty Research Office.
DECRA Future Fellow 1 Future Fellow 2 Future Fellow 3
(Capability) Investigator capability
35% 50% 50% 50%
Research Opportunity and Performance Evidence (ROPE).
High quality research outputs. Outstanding research outputs.
Build collabs … across research organisations, industry and other disciplines.
Research training, mentoring & supervision. Excellence in…
National research standing.
National and emerging international research standing.
International research standing.
Leadership capability. Leadership capabilities. Initiating and managing large research projects.
6
ARC Scoring Matrix
DECRA Future Fellowship 1 – 3
Project quality and innovation: 25% 25%
Benefit: 15% 15%
Feasibility & Strat Alignment 10% 10%
What is a ROPE?Research Opportunity and Performance (ROPE)• The best evidence for future success is past success(es)• This is the means by which your track record is captured in the application
Contains• essential sections to outline your competitive case for the fellowship
• Why you should fund me and why now?• important eligibility sections • essential sections to outline your competitive case for the fellowship
• Why you should fund me and why now?
This takes a while and requires a good deal of effort • Start with Profile section of RMS (now)
Academic interruptions are significant disruptions to opportunities for research, due to both employment and personal reasons. They may include:
• Time spent employed in other sectors • Relocation of a participant and her/his research laboratory or other similar circumstances • Pregnancy• Major illness/injury• Carer responsibilities• For Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participants, community obligations including ‘sorry business’.
•
And in practical terms…?101: ROPE anatomy (in RMS) Section Summary How to TimeF1‐2, F5, F9 Personal Details, Qualifications Populated from Profile section of RMS Short, less if RMS is up to date
F3 Fields of Research Need to be entered into RMS (application) Short
F4 Expertise Text Complete this in Profile section of RMS Revise
F6 Research Load (non‐ARC Grants and Research)
Upload template Short
F7 Currently held ARC Projects Auto‐populated
F8 Candidate's time commitment (%) Short
F10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
Eligibility matters, including appointments
For example: • DECRA – time exemption• FT – PhD?
Start early ‐may take a some days to get this sorted
F16 – DECRA(F19 – FT)
ROPE ‐ Academic Interruptions Need to be entered into RMS (application) Start early ‐may take a some days to get this sorted
F17 – DECRA(F20 – FT)
ROPE 5 page upload. Details of the Future Fellowship candidate’s academic career and opportunities for research, evidence of research impact and contributions to the field, including those most relevant to this application
This is the biggie!A day to write – then lots of reviews. 5+ days
F18 ROPE – Research Output Context The context for your field May take days
F19 ROPE – Top 10 research outputs Select pubs from profile Short*
Your 5-page ROPE
This is the most important part of the ROPE section • Details of your academic career and opportunities for research, evidence of research impact and contributions to the field, including those most relevant to this Proposal
From the ARC Instructions to Applicants:Upload a PDF of no more than five A4 pages and in the format described in Appendix B of these instructions. The PDF must provide the following information that is relevant to your circumstances and opportunities in the order set out below: AMOUNT OF TIME AS AN ACTIVE RESEARCHER RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES RESEARCH ACHIEVEMENTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS
Your 5-page ROPEAMOUNT OF TIME AS AN ACTIVE RESEARCHER
Provide: • The number of years since the Future Fellowship candidate graduated with their
highest educational qualification• A total FTE figure for periods of unemployment, part-time employment or
interruptions for childbirth, carers’ responsibilities, misadventure, or debilitating illness during that period.
For example, I was awarded my PhD (x) years ago in (year) and in that period I have experienced a total of two years (at X.X FTE) of academic interruptions.
FT - Tom
Your 5-page ROPERESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES
Provide details, relative to the fellowship candidate’s specific opportunities considerations (both negative and positive) and the effect this has had on their research. This may include: • Any additional explanation required of the Future Fellowship candidate’s response to
question F17 (DECRA) / F19 (FT).• The research opportunity the DECRA/FT candidate has had in the context of their
employment situation, including employment outside academia, any unemployment or part-time employment they may have experienced, and the research component of their employment conditions.
• A description of the DECRA/FT candidate’s role:– University based, indicate % time spent on their current role/s (e.g. teaching and research), provide
additional information (e.g. PT) to enable assessors to understand the situation.; – Industry based, indicate % time spent on their (e.g. administration, researcher in business, project
manager), provide additional information to enable assessors to understand the situation.
• The research mentoring and research facilities that have been available to the DECRA/FT candidate during their career.
• Any other aspects of the DECRA/FT candidate's career or opportunities for research that are relevant to assessment and that have not been detailed elsewhere in this application Any circumstances that may have slowed down their research and publications or affected
the time they have had to conduct and publish their research. Track record with respect to opportunity.
Your 5-page ROPE
DECRA - Kevin
Career disruptions
What are they?
Academic interruptions are significant disruptions to opportunities for research, due to both employment and personal reasons. They may include:
Time spent employed in other sectors Relocation of a participant and her/his research laboratory or other similar circumstances PregnancyMajor illness/injuryCarer responsibilitiesFor Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participants, community obligations including ‘sorry business’.
RIC calculator for DECRAs • For PhDs prior to 1 March 2015• Talk to your faculty RO now… • To RIC 15 Oct 2020 (TBC)
• https://sites.research.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/excel_doc/0011/3198233/DE21_Eligibility‐Exemption‐Request‐Calculator_FINAL_v1.xlsx
How to deliver a compelling case to the assessor?
Your 5-page ROPE
DECRA - Kevin
Your 5-page ROPE
DECRA - Tom
Future - Tom
Your 5-page ROPE
RESEARCH ACHIEVEMENTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS • Your peer esteem items – recognition of your achievements and significant contributions to the field– Prizes, honours and awards– Invited keynote and speaker addresses– Research support income– Commercial outcomes such as patents, IP licences and resulting benefits– Identifiable benefits outside of academia– Other professional activities
– Describe how the DECRA/FT candidate's research has led to a significant change or advance of knowledge in their field, and outline how their achievements will contribute to this application.
Future
DECRA
The Assessor’s perspective “Why should we invest in this person? Why now?
Why fund the proposed research?”
• How do you assess (score) a DECRA? • How is a Future Fellowship is scored?• What is relative to opportunity?• What if we did nothing?
What Assessor’s look for“Why should we invest in this person? Why now?
Why fund the proposed research?”
• A stellar researcher;• They are the BEST person to do THIS project at this time,– with evidence of an appropriate track record;
• A great project.
Tell your story ‐ link your track record and career narrative to the projectUse the ROPE section to provide the evidence and context to convinceassessors Also must demonstrate that the feasibility of the proposed research.
What you wish you’d been told before you started the application…
Reflections from Kevin Staub, ARC DECRA, DECRA assessorTom Wilkening, current ARC Future Fellow, FT assessor
What you wish you’d been told before you started the application…
Unlike ARC Discovery grants, the main C1 project section of the Future Fellowship requires an extensive description of the Future Fellowship Candidate. • Give yourself extra time if adapting a rejected discovery project application.• Consider writing C1 before the ROPE so you know what to stress in the ROPE section.
Reviewers seem to have made up their mind before the ROPE section, so flag any “relative to opportunity” arguments early even if you are discussing them in detail in the ROPE section.• Finding the right balance in C1 between the candidate sections and project sections was hard. It required the most writing.
• Reviewing grants that try to squeeze in too much content by manipulating margins and sacrificing writing quality are annoying to review.
What you wish you’d been told before you started the application…
• The repository of past winners is useful for seeing how others have approached some of the selection criteria (e.g., strategic alignment).
• The new “publication in context” section is a useful place to provide discipline related context and to discuss quantity‐quality variation across disciplines.
• Reviewers may download your papers that you claim are your best work, so make sure the working paper versions are up to date on websites.
Audience Q&A.
Helen Mackenzie, Bird Photography Australia
Every Magpie is different, but they all have a Seagull on their beak…
What next?Submit your Notice of Intent…• go.unimelb.edu.au/r9ta
ARC RMS, register as a new user• https://rms.arc.gov.au/RMS/ActionCentre/Account/RegisterUser
Grant camp sessions• Jonathan O’Donnell Senior Research Initiative Coordinator, Science
Next sessions of the Support program for ARC DECRA and FT • ROPE#2 ‐ Positioning your publications in context, 27 August 2020• Your Research Project, 7 September 2020
• Crafting a well‐justified ARC fellowship budget, 29 September 2020