rolling ridge elementary school

30
Rolling Ridge Elementary School 2013-2014 Inspir ing to Belie v e

Upload: charissa-pollard

Post on 02-Jan-2016

22 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Inspiring to Believe. Rolling Ridge Elementary School. 2013-2014. PALS Scores: 2012-2013. DRA Scores – Fall to Spring 2012-2013. DRA Scores 2012-2013. Congratulations!!. All AMOs were met in Reading and Math Met full accreditation in the state of Virginia - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

Rolling Ridge Elementary School2013-2014

Insp

irin

g t

o B

elie

ve

Page 2: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

PALS Scores: 2012-2013

FALL SPRING FALL SPRING FALL FALL SPRING1 2 3 KG

7377

11

48

8

59

72

6 813

21

1118

8

PALS

Met Benchmark # Below Benchmark #

Page 3: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

DRA Scores – Fall to Spring 2012-2013

Total Tested #

Met Benchmark #

Met Benchmark %

Below Benchmark #

Below Benchmark %

KG FALL

SPRING 83 60 72% 23 28%

01 FALL 78 42 54% 36 46%

SPRING 79 67 85% 12 15%

02 FALL 78 42 54% 36 46%

SPRING 74 52 70% 22 30%

03 FALL 100 65 65% 35 35%

SPRING 63 33 52% 30 48%

04 FALL 85 44 52% 41 48%

SPRING 64 31 48% 33 52%

05 FALL 79 63 80% 16 20%

SPRING 21 11 52% 10 48%

Page 4: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

DRA Scores 2012-2013FA

LL

SPR

ING

FA

LL

SPR

ING

FA

LL

SPR

ING

FA

LL

SPR

ING

FA

LL

SPR

ING

FA

LL

SPR

ING

KG 1 2 3 4 5

60

42

67

42

52

65

33

44

31

63

11

23

36

12

36

22

3530

41

33

1610

DRA 2013

Met Benchmark # Below Benchmark #

Page 5: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

Congratulations!!

• All AMOs were met in Reading and Math

• Met full accreditation in the state of Virginia

• Let’s look a little more closely at the numbers

Page 6: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

Math Performance – All StudentsData Source

Students Counted

Total Students

RRD Score

AMO Previous AMO

3 year 591 791 74.7% 64% 61%

Current 213 276 77.2% 64% 61%

Previous 153 255 60.0%

3 year

Current

Previous

75%

77%

60%

64%

64%

All Students

AMO RRD Score17%

Increase

Page 7: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

3 Proficiency Gap Groups

Gap Group 1

Gap Group 2

Gap Group 3

Students with DisabilitiesEnglish Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Black students, not of Hispanic Origin*

Hispanic students, of one or more races*

*to include students with disabilities, English language learners, and Economically disadvantaged students

Page 8: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

Math Performance – Gap Group 1Data Source

Students Counted

Total Students

RRD Score

AMO Previous AMO

3 year 412 586 70% 52% 47%

Current 152 209 73% 52%

Previous 102 189 54%

3 year

Current

Previous

70%

73%

54%

52%

52%

Gap Group 1 = SPED + ELL + F/R Lunch

AMO RRD Score

19% Increase

Page 9: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

Math Performance – Gap Group 2Data Source

Students Counted

Total Students

RRD Score

AMO Previous AMO

3 year 412 586 74% 51% 45%

Current 152 209 79% 51%

Previous 102 189 58%

3 year

Current

Previous

74%

79%

58%

51%

51%

Gap Group 2 = Black Students

AMO RRD Score

21% Increase

Page 10: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

Math – Gap Group 3 (Hispanic)Data Source Students

CountedTotal Students

RRD Score AMO

3 Year 274 413 66% 56%

Current 19 24 70% 56%

Previous 69 138 50%

3 Year

Current

Previous

66%

70%

50%

56%

56%

Gap Group 3

AMO RRD Score

20% Increase

Page 11: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

Other Individual Subgroups

• Students with disabilities

• English language learners

• Economically disadvantaged students

• White students• Asian students

Page 12: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

Math – Economically DisadvantagedData Source Students

CountedTotal Students

RRD Score AMO

3 year 329 481 68% 52%

Current 124 177 70% 52%

Previous 81 157 52%

3 year

Current

Previous

68%

70%

52%

52%

52%

Economically Disadvantaged

AMO RRD Score 18% Increase

Page 13: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

Math – Limited English ProficientData Source Students

CountedTotal Students

RRD Score AMO

3 year 273 410 67% 46%

Current 95 142 67% 46%

Previous 62 129 48%

3 year

Current

Previous

67%

67%

48%

46%

46%

Limited English Proficient

AMO RRD Score 19% Increase

Page 14: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

Math – Students with DisabilitiesData Source Students

CountedTotal Students

RRD Score AMO

3 year 79 126 63% 41%

Current 39 51 76% 41%

Previous 16 41 39%

3 year

Current

Previous

63%

76%

39%

41%

41%

Students with Disabilities

AMO RRD Score37%

Increase

Page 15: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

How do we compare to other schools in reading?

All S

tude

nts

Gap G

roup

1

Gap G

roup

2

Gap G

roup

3As

ian

Econ

. Disa

dvan

tage

d

L.E.

P.

Stud

ents w

Disa

bilit

ies

White

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

East Cent 1Title 1 East 3Leesburg 4RRD

Page 16: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

English Scores dropped on average 20% or more across the state of VA.• New SOL test – much more rigorous

assessment• Our drops were far less than 20%

Page 17: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

English Performance – All StudentsData Source

Students Counted

Total Students

RRD Score

AMO Previous AMO

3 year 583 788 74% 66% 85%

Current 184 275 67% 66%

Previous 200 258 78%

3 year

Current

Previous

74%

67%

78%

66%

66%

All Students

AMO RRD Score

- 12%

-19%

Page 18: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

English Performance – Gap Group 1Data Source

Students Counted

Total Students

RRD Score

AMO Previous AMO

3 year 386 578 67% 52% 76%

Current 126 207 61% 52%

Previous 131 188 70%

3 year

Current

Previous

67%

61%

70%

52%

52%

Gap Group 1 = SPED + ELL + F/R Lunch

AMO RRD Score

- 9%

-24%

Page 19: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

English Performance – Gap Group 2Data Source

Students Counted

Total Students

RRD Score

AMO Previous AMO

3 year 52 72 68% 49% 76%

Current 16 24 67% 49%

Previous 19 26 73%

3 year

Current

Previous

68%

67%

73%

49%

49%

Gap Group 2 = Black Students

AMO RRD Score

- 6%

-27%

Page 20: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

English Performance – Gap Group 3Data Source

Students Counted

Total Students

RRD Score

AMO Previous AMO

3 year 272 410 66% 53% 80%

Current 91 151 60% 53%

Previous 96 138 70%

3 year

Current

Previous

66%

60%

70%

53%

53%

Gap Group 3 = Hispanic Students

AMO RRD Score

- 10%

-27%

Page 21: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

English Performance – AsianData Source

Students Counted

Total Students

RRD Score

AMO Previous AMO

3 year 86 104 83% 80% 92%

Current 21 29 72% 80%

Previous 32 36 89%

3 year

Current

Previous

83%

72%

89%

80%

80%

Asian Students

AMO RRD Score

- 17%

-8%

Page 22: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

English – Economically DisadvantagedData Source

Students Counted

Total Students

RRD Score

AMO Previous AMO

3 year 314 475 66% 52% 76%

Current 109 176 62% 52%

Previous 104 154 68%

3 year

Current

Previous

66%

62%

68%

52%

52%

Economically Disadvantaged Students

AMO RRD Score

- 6%

-24%

Page 23: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

English Performance – Students w/ Disabilities

Data Source

Students Counted

Total Students

RRD Score

AMO Previous AMO

3 year 65 126 52% 30% 59%

Current 28 50 56% 30%

Previous 21 42 50%

3 year

Current

Previous

52%

56%

50%

30%

30%

Students with Disabilities

AMO RRD Score

- 6%

-29%

Page 24: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

English Performance – White Students

Data Source

Students Counted

Total Students

RRD Score

AMO Previous AMO

3 year 139 154 90% 74% 90%

Current 43 51 84% 74%

Previous 43 47 91%

3 year

Current

Previous

90%

84%

91%

74%

74%

White Students

AMO RRD Score

- 7%

-16%

Page 25: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

How do we compare to other schools in reading?

All S

tude

nts

Gap G

roup

1

Gap G

roup

2

Gap G

roup

3

Asia

n

Econ

. Disad

vant

aged

L.E.

P.

Stud

ents

w D

isab

ilitie

s

Whi

te0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

East Cent 1Title 1 East 3Leesburg 4RRD

Page 26: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

So how did we do it?

1. Successful identification of struggling students based on assessments given

2. Successful implementation of a tiered intervention program to provide reteaching for those who need it

3. Successful monitoring of the interventions given

Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

* Please refer to your handout

Page 27: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

What does this look like?

Let’s take a look at the Rolling Ridge Elementary School Improvement Plan

• TA01 Identification• TA02 Intervention• TA03 Monitoring• IE08 Principal’s time – 50% of time directly

related to instruction• IF08 Staff development based on identified

areas of relative deficit

Page 28: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

What are we doing to enrich?• What are the other students doing while

their classmates receive tier 2 and/or tier 3 services?– Read (Independently / Reader’s Theatre)– Write – iReady – individualized remediation and

enrichment program – Enrichment groups (provided by the

SEARCH and FLES teacher)– Reading buddy for younger students– TBD – technology club (select students will

create iMovies and multimedia presentations)

Page 29: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

We need your help!!

• Read with your child every day OR make sure that your child reads on his/her own

• Check your child’s homework planner daily!!

• If you have computer access, encourage your child to go practice on reflex math or iReady instead of watching TV or play Xbox

• Practice math facts with your child (in the car is the best place. . . They are a captive audience)

• Ask you child about their day. . . Our teachers post and review objectives every day, ask them to tell you what the objective for their math lesson was!)

• Encourage your child, celebrate their successes!!

Page 30: Rolling Ridge Elementary School

Questions?