rolling ridge elementary school
DESCRIPTION
Inspiring to Believe. Rolling Ridge Elementary School. 2013-2014. PALS Scores: 2012-2013. DRA Scores – Fall to Spring 2012-2013. DRA Scores 2012-2013. Congratulations!!. All AMOs were met in Reading and Math Met full accreditation in the state of Virginia - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Rolling Ridge Elementary School2013-2014
Insp
irin
g t
o B
elie
ve
PALS Scores: 2012-2013
FALL SPRING FALL SPRING FALL FALL SPRING1 2 3 KG
7377
11
48
8
59
72
6 813
21
1118
8
PALS
Met Benchmark # Below Benchmark #
DRA Scores – Fall to Spring 2012-2013
Total Tested #
Met Benchmark #
Met Benchmark %
Below Benchmark #
Below Benchmark %
KG FALL
SPRING 83 60 72% 23 28%
01 FALL 78 42 54% 36 46%
SPRING 79 67 85% 12 15%
02 FALL 78 42 54% 36 46%
SPRING 74 52 70% 22 30%
03 FALL 100 65 65% 35 35%
SPRING 63 33 52% 30 48%
04 FALL 85 44 52% 41 48%
SPRING 64 31 48% 33 52%
05 FALL 79 63 80% 16 20%
SPRING 21 11 52% 10 48%
DRA Scores 2012-2013FA
LL
SPR
ING
FA
LL
SPR
ING
FA
LL
SPR
ING
FA
LL
SPR
ING
FA
LL
SPR
ING
FA
LL
SPR
ING
KG 1 2 3 4 5
60
42
67
42
52
65
33
44
31
63
11
23
36
12
36
22
3530
41
33
1610
DRA 2013
Met Benchmark # Below Benchmark #
Congratulations!!
• All AMOs were met in Reading and Math
• Met full accreditation in the state of Virginia
• Let’s look a little more closely at the numbers
Math Performance – All StudentsData Source
Students Counted
Total Students
RRD Score
AMO Previous AMO
3 year 591 791 74.7% 64% 61%
Current 213 276 77.2% 64% 61%
Previous 153 255 60.0%
3 year
Current
Previous
75%
77%
60%
64%
64%
All Students
AMO RRD Score17%
Increase
3 Proficiency Gap Groups
Gap Group 1
Gap Group 2
Gap Group 3
Students with DisabilitiesEnglish Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Black students, not of Hispanic Origin*
Hispanic students, of one or more races*
*to include students with disabilities, English language learners, and Economically disadvantaged students
Math Performance – Gap Group 1Data Source
Students Counted
Total Students
RRD Score
AMO Previous AMO
3 year 412 586 70% 52% 47%
Current 152 209 73% 52%
Previous 102 189 54%
3 year
Current
Previous
70%
73%
54%
52%
52%
Gap Group 1 = SPED + ELL + F/R Lunch
AMO RRD Score
19% Increase
Math Performance – Gap Group 2Data Source
Students Counted
Total Students
RRD Score
AMO Previous AMO
3 year 412 586 74% 51% 45%
Current 152 209 79% 51%
Previous 102 189 58%
3 year
Current
Previous
74%
79%
58%
51%
51%
Gap Group 2 = Black Students
AMO RRD Score
21% Increase
Math – Gap Group 3 (Hispanic)Data Source Students
CountedTotal Students
RRD Score AMO
3 Year 274 413 66% 56%
Current 19 24 70% 56%
Previous 69 138 50%
3 Year
Current
Previous
66%
70%
50%
56%
56%
Gap Group 3
AMO RRD Score
20% Increase
Other Individual Subgroups
• Students with disabilities
• English language learners
• Economically disadvantaged students
• White students• Asian students
Math – Economically DisadvantagedData Source Students
CountedTotal Students
RRD Score AMO
3 year 329 481 68% 52%
Current 124 177 70% 52%
Previous 81 157 52%
3 year
Current
Previous
68%
70%
52%
52%
52%
Economically Disadvantaged
AMO RRD Score 18% Increase
Math – Limited English ProficientData Source Students
CountedTotal Students
RRD Score AMO
3 year 273 410 67% 46%
Current 95 142 67% 46%
Previous 62 129 48%
3 year
Current
Previous
67%
67%
48%
46%
46%
Limited English Proficient
AMO RRD Score 19% Increase
Math – Students with DisabilitiesData Source Students
CountedTotal Students
RRD Score AMO
3 year 79 126 63% 41%
Current 39 51 76% 41%
Previous 16 41 39%
3 year
Current
Previous
63%
76%
39%
41%
41%
Students with Disabilities
AMO RRD Score37%
Increase
How do we compare to other schools in reading?
All S
tude
nts
Gap G
roup
1
Gap G
roup
2
Gap G
roup
3As
ian
Econ
. Disa
dvan
tage
d
L.E.
P.
Stud
ents w
Disa
bilit
ies
White
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
East Cent 1Title 1 East 3Leesburg 4RRD
English Scores dropped on average 20% or more across the state of VA.• New SOL test – much more rigorous
assessment• Our drops were far less than 20%
English Performance – All StudentsData Source
Students Counted
Total Students
RRD Score
AMO Previous AMO
3 year 583 788 74% 66% 85%
Current 184 275 67% 66%
Previous 200 258 78%
3 year
Current
Previous
74%
67%
78%
66%
66%
All Students
AMO RRD Score
- 12%
-19%
English Performance – Gap Group 1Data Source
Students Counted
Total Students
RRD Score
AMO Previous AMO
3 year 386 578 67% 52% 76%
Current 126 207 61% 52%
Previous 131 188 70%
3 year
Current
Previous
67%
61%
70%
52%
52%
Gap Group 1 = SPED + ELL + F/R Lunch
AMO RRD Score
- 9%
-24%
English Performance – Gap Group 2Data Source
Students Counted
Total Students
RRD Score
AMO Previous AMO
3 year 52 72 68% 49% 76%
Current 16 24 67% 49%
Previous 19 26 73%
3 year
Current
Previous
68%
67%
73%
49%
49%
Gap Group 2 = Black Students
AMO RRD Score
- 6%
-27%
English Performance – Gap Group 3Data Source
Students Counted
Total Students
RRD Score
AMO Previous AMO
3 year 272 410 66% 53% 80%
Current 91 151 60% 53%
Previous 96 138 70%
3 year
Current
Previous
66%
60%
70%
53%
53%
Gap Group 3 = Hispanic Students
AMO RRD Score
- 10%
-27%
English Performance – AsianData Source
Students Counted
Total Students
RRD Score
AMO Previous AMO
3 year 86 104 83% 80% 92%
Current 21 29 72% 80%
Previous 32 36 89%
3 year
Current
Previous
83%
72%
89%
80%
80%
Asian Students
AMO RRD Score
- 17%
-8%
English – Economically DisadvantagedData Source
Students Counted
Total Students
RRD Score
AMO Previous AMO
3 year 314 475 66% 52% 76%
Current 109 176 62% 52%
Previous 104 154 68%
3 year
Current
Previous
66%
62%
68%
52%
52%
Economically Disadvantaged Students
AMO RRD Score
- 6%
-24%
English Performance – Students w/ Disabilities
Data Source
Students Counted
Total Students
RRD Score
AMO Previous AMO
3 year 65 126 52% 30% 59%
Current 28 50 56% 30%
Previous 21 42 50%
3 year
Current
Previous
52%
56%
50%
30%
30%
Students with Disabilities
AMO RRD Score
- 6%
-29%
English Performance – White Students
Data Source
Students Counted
Total Students
RRD Score
AMO Previous AMO
3 year 139 154 90% 74% 90%
Current 43 51 84% 74%
Previous 43 47 91%
3 year
Current
Previous
90%
84%
91%
74%
74%
White Students
AMO RRD Score
- 7%
-16%
How do we compare to other schools in reading?
All S
tude
nts
Gap G
roup
1
Gap G
roup
2
Gap G
roup
3
Asia
n
Econ
. Disad
vant
aged
L.E.
P.
Stud
ents
w D
isab
ilitie
s
Whi
te0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
East Cent 1Title 1 East 3Leesburg 4RRD
So how did we do it?
1. Successful identification of struggling students based on assessments given
2. Successful implementation of a tiered intervention program to provide reteaching for those who need it
3. Successful monitoring of the interventions given
Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3
* Please refer to your handout
What does this look like?
Let’s take a look at the Rolling Ridge Elementary School Improvement Plan
• TA01 Identification• TA02 Intervention• TA03 Monitoring• IE08 Principal’s time – 50% of time directly
related to instruction• IF08 Staff development based on identified
areas of relative deficit
What are we doing to enrich?• What are the other students doing while
their classmates receive tier 2 and/or tier 3 services?– Read (Independently / Reader’s Theatre)– Write – iReady – individualized remediation and
enrichment program – Enrichment groups (provided by the
SEARCH and FLES teacher)– Reading buddy for younger students– TBD – technology club (select students will
create iMovies and multimedia presentations)
We need your help!!
• Read with your child every day OR make sure that your child reads on his/her own
• Check your child’s homework planner daily!!
• If you have computer access, encourage your child to go practice on reflex math or iReady instead of watching TV or play Xbox
• Practice math facts with your child (in the car is the best place. . . They are a captive audience)
• Ask you child about their day. . . Our teachers post and review objectives every day, ask them to tell you what the objective for their math lesson was!)
• Encourage your child, celebrate their successes!!
Questions?