results based accountability for food sector

34
Results-Based Accountability TM Featuring the Vermont Food System September 24, 2013 Anne Lezak and Kate Jellema, BBVT Slides adapted from Amy Carmola-Hauf, United Way of Chittenden County and Mark Friedman, Fiscal Policy Studies Institute

Upload: lauren-glenn-davitian

Post on 16-Jan-2015

231 views

Category:

Business


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Results-Based Accountability ™ is a performance management framework outlined by performance outcomes specialist Mark Friedman in “Trying Hard is Not Good Enough.” More than 600 of Vermont’s nonprofit and state government leaders have been trained to use RBA to answer these critical performance questions: How much are we doing? How well are we doing it? Is anyone better off? Learn how to promote the “culture of accountability” within your business, organization or coalition. Benchmarks for a Better Vermont offers this 90-minute RBA overview/refresher using examples from Vermont’s farm and food systems sector.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

Results-Based AccountabilityTM Featuring the Vermont Food System

September 24, 2013

Anne Lezak and Kate Jellema, BBVT

Slides adapted from Amy Carmola-Hauf, United Way of Chittenden County and Mark Friedman, Fiscal Policy Studies Institute

Page 2: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

How's this webinar going to work?

1. Welcome! We’ll start at 2 pm.

2. One-way video and sound

o Speaker volumeo Sound check

3. Two-way chat (typing)o Practice typing your name and

organization in the chat box.

4. What if you lose the connection?

o Try again

Page 3: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

START RECORDING NOW

If it works, the recording will be posted to the Common Good website.

Page 4: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

Results-Based AccountabilityTM For Vermont Food System and Agriculture Partners

September 24, 2013

Anne Lezak and Kate Jellema, BBVT

Slides adapted from Amy Carmola-Hauf, United Way of Chittenden County and Mark Friedman, Fiscal Policy Studies Institute

Page 5: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

Agenda for Today (2:00-3:30 pm)

• Tech Orientation• Welcome!• Results-Based Accountability in a Nutshell• Next Steps• Questions

Page 6: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

Next Steps

• Full-day RBA training for food systems sector participants:

RBA for VT Food SystemsMonday, Oct. 7, 9:00 – 4:00VT Technical College, RandolphFor more info, visit: http://bit.ly/RBA4Food

• Customized training, Coaching and TA Contact [email protected]

Page 7: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

What Do I Hope to Accomplish?

7

Provide basic understanding of and appreciation for RBA What is Results-Based Accountability? What are the two levels of accountability and why do they

matter? How can RBA help us better plan, communicate, and maximize

limited resources? How can RBA contribute to our increasing our effectiveness?

Pique your interest – RBA might be for us! Kate will answer: Where do we learn more?

Page 8: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

What is Results-Based Accountability?

8

• Framework for planning, doing, evaluating

• Process for moving from Talk to Action

• Cycle for continuous improvement

• Tool for communicating

Page 9: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

“My question is: Are we making an impact?

Page 10: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

3 kinds of performance measures

RBA

2 kinds of accountability

7 questions from ends to means

2-3-7

Page 11: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

Different Levels of Focus = Different Levels of Accountability

Population LevelFocus – well-being of population:

community, state, nation

Performance LevelFocus – well-being of program

participants/service recipients

Page 12: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

From Ends to Means

ENDS

MEANS

Popu

latio

nPe

rfor

man

ce

RESULT

INDICATOR

PERFORMANCEMEASURE

Customer result = EndsService delivery = Means

Page 13: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

DEFINITIONS

1. How much did we do? 2. How well did we do it? 3. Is anyone better off?

RESULT or OUTCOME

INDICATOR or BENCHMARK

PERFORMANCE MEASURE

A condition of well-being for children, adults, families or communities.

A measure which helps quantify the achievement of a result.

A measure of how well a program, agency or service system is working. Three types:

Popu

latio

nPe

rfor

man

cePo

pula

tion

Perf

orm

ance

= Customer Results

Page 14: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

POPULATION ACCOUNTABILITY EXAMPLES

RESULTS for All Peopleof a State, County, Community

Children are Ready for School

Adults Lead Healthy and Productive Lives

Vermonters Have Access to Fresh, Nutritious, Affordable Food

Vermonters Benefit from a Thriving, Sustainable Farm Economy

Page 15: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

Result: Adults Lead Healthy and Productive Lives

• Percent of adults who smoke

• Percent of adults who are binge drinkers

• Percent of adults above poverty level

• Rate of adult employment

Can you think of another indicator?

INDICATORS

Page 16: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

Result, Indicator, or Performance Measure? Vermont Elders are Healthy and Active % of elders in Windsor County overweight or

obese % of a Senior Center’s clients eating more

fresh fruits & vegetables at Center lunches

A. % of Vermont restaurant jobs that pay livable wages

B. People working in Vermont’s food systems businesses have jobs with livable wages

C. % of job training program graduates who find restaurant work are paid livable wages

Page 17: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

Result: Vermonters Have Access to Fresh, Nutritious, Affordable Food

• Percent of households that are food insecure

• Percent of food that food shelf clients receive comprised of fresh fruit and vegetables

• Percent of children enrolled in schools with Farm-to-School programs

• Rate of eligible households using EBT cards or Farm to Family cards at Farmers Markets

INDICATORS

Page 18: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

Criteria for Choosing IndicatorsCommunication Power•Does the indicator communicate to a broad range of audiences?

Proxy Power•Does the indicator say something of central importance?

Data Power•Are there quality data available on a timely basis?

Page 19: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

Population/Community Focus: 7 Questions

1. What are the quality of life conditions we want? Vermonters have access to fresh, nutritious, affordable food

2. How will we recognize it? Children eat fresh, nutritious food in school lunches

3. How can we measure those conditions?Percent of children in schools with Farm to School programs

4. How are we doing now?Baseline and story behind the baseline

Page 20: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

Population/Community Focus: 7 Questions, Cont.

5. Who are the partners?

6. What works to do better?Committed school team, training, mentoring, planning time and resources, food preparation guidance, lesson plans, partnering with farms and distribution networks

7. What do we propose to do?Vermont Farm to School Institute- 10 schools, June, 2013

Page 21: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

Overweight and Obese Vermonters From Farm to Plate Strategic Plan (2013)

Page 22: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

Food Insecurity and Very Low Food Security in Vermont Households From Farm to Plate Strategic Plan (2013)

Page 23: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

Performance Accountability

Focus - well being of program participants/service recipients

Page 24: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

Performance Accountability Focus: 7 Questions

1. Who are our customers?2. How can we measure if our customers are

better off?3. How can we measure if we are delivering

services well? Quality4. How are we doing on the most important of

these measures? Effect5. Who are the partners that have a role to play in

doing better?6. What works to do better, including no-cost and

low-cost ideas?7. What do we propose to do?

Page 25: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

How much did we do?

Program Performance Measures

How welldid we do it?

Is anyonebetter off?

Quantity Quality

Effe

ct

Effo

rt

# %

Page 26: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

Program Performance Measures

How well?

Is anyone better off?

# People served

# Hours of service# Activities (by type of activity)

Participant satisfaction

Use of best practice

Staff qualifications/training

Change in skills, knowledge, attitude, behavior, circumstance, well being

Possible sources: program records, participant survey, external data

How much?

Page 27: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

Program Performance MeasuresFarm to School Institute

How much?# of participants # of days of training# of training modules

How well?% training curriculum based on recognized best practices for farm to school programs% school teams representing all priority partners% participants satisfied with trainers and quality of training

Is anyone better off?% trained teams launching Farm to School Programs in new schools% increase in children in schools with Farm to School Programs

Page 28: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

RESULT: What we want

STRATEGY 1Who? What?

For whom?

STRATEGY 2Who? What?

For whom?

STRATEGY 3Who? What?

For whom?

OTHER INFLUENCES

Indicator: • How we measure it• Baseline & trend data

Performance Measures: • How much? • How well?• Anyone better

off?

Performance Measures: • How much? • How well?• Anyone better off?

Performance Measures: • How much? • How well?• Anyone better

off?

Page 29: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

Partner Partner Partner Partner Partner Partner

What can WE do collectively?

END

Condition of well being for community

What will it take?

Who are the partners with a role to play?

Page 30: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

RBA helps us ask:

1. What investments should we make in time, staff, resources?

2. How can we know if those investments are a making a difference?

3. How can we work together with partners to achieve collective impact?

Page 31: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

Summary: Key Features of RBA

2 Levels of Accountability (focus)

7 Questions from ENDS (want) to MEANS (do)

3 Performance Measurement Questions

Page 32: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

Acknowledgements & Resources

Fiscal Policy Studies Institutewww.resultsaccountability.com

www.raguide.org

Trying Hard Is Not Good Enough:How to Produce Measurable Improvements for Customers and Communities, Mark Friedman

Amy Carmola, Ph.D.Director, Community Impact & Volunteer Mobilization

United Way of Chittenden County

For more information, see bbvt.marlboro.edu or contact Anne Lezak at

[email protected]

Page 33: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

Next Steps

• Full-day RBA training for food systems sector participants:

RBA for VT Food SystemsMonday, Oct. 7, 9:00 – 4:00VT Technical College, RandolphFor more info, visit: http://bit.ly/RBA4Food

• Customized training, Coaching and TA Contact [email protected]

• RBA Showcase on October 16 in Barre!Contact [email protected]

Page 34: Results Based Accountability for Food Sector

Your Questions?