resting splint research splint provision charlie laver
TRANSCRIPT
1c J Mellson,A Hammond, C Laver 2010
Resting Splint Survey:
NW COTSS-Rheumatology
Group
Jo Mellson1, Alison Hammond1 Charlie Laver2
Centre for Health, Sport & Rehabilitation Research, University of Salford1
ICATS, Pennine MSK Partnership2
2
Background
Agenda item at NW COTSS (April 2009)
to discuss: Midline or pronation? Benefits
of pressure gloves?
Survey questions submitted by members
to include in survey
Decision by the group to investigate current
practice due to unclear evidence base
3c J Mellson,A Hammond, C Laver 2010
Aim of the study
Investigate current practice amongst COT-SS Rheumatology OT members related to provision of NRS in RA:
rationale for splint provision in early and established RA;
differing splint designs used and rationale for these;
wearing regimens recommended ;
patient instructions regarding splint wear and care;
methods used by OTs to assess for splint provision and evaluate effectiveness;
and rationale for use of compression gloves as an alternative to RS.
4c J Mellson,A Hammond, C Laver 2010
MethodPotential content generated at COTSS-R meeting;
additional items submitted; literature.review
Draft questionnaire v 1 developed
Reviewed at COTSS-R meeting;
additional items recommended
Draft questionnaire v 2
Reviewed by COTSS-R members; revisions recommended
Final version
University ethics approval
E-mailed/ mailed to 35 NW Rheumatology OTs
5c J Mellson,A Hammond, C Laver 2010
Analysis
Quantitative:
– descriptive medians and inter-quartile ranges
Qualitative:
– content analysis (Burnard 1991)
– Thematic analysis or
– Frequency counts (as applicable).
6c J Mellson,A Hammond, C Laver 2010
Questionnaire: six sections
1. Resting splint provision
2. Resting splint design
3. Wearing regimens and splint instructions
4. Splint evaluation
5. Compression gloves
6. Final comments
7c J Mellson,A Hammond, C Laver 2010
Response Rate
24/ 35 OTs replied (69%)
79% of respondents made splints
Respondents (n=19)
Majority of sample Band 7 OT’s
Years splinting experience: 14.95 (SD
8.09)
Years experience in Rheumatology: 14.00
(SD 8.42)
8c J Mellson,A Hammond, C Laver 2010
Resting Splint (RS)
service provisionEarly RA:
13/19 when stable on DMARDs
On average 25% of patients receive RS (IQR 10-35%)
On average 3 splints provided per month (IQR 1-5)
Established RA
On average 22.5% of patients receive RS (IQR 13.75-32.50%)
On average 3 splints provided per month (IQR 2-5.25)
9c J Mellson,A Hammond, C Laver 2010
Importance of RS aims in early and established
rheumatoid arthritis (median: IQR) (n=19).
1=low; 5 = high importance Early RA
(< 2 years)
Established
RA(> 2 years)
Decrease pain at night 5 (5-5) 5 (5-5)
Rest/ immobilise weakened joint structures
to decrease local inflammation
5 (4-5) 5 (4-5)
Correctly position joints in which
deformities have already begun to develop
4 (2-5) 4 (3-5)
Minimise joint contractures 3 (2-4) 4 (3-4)
Minimise risk of deformity development (eg
MCPJ subluxation)
3 (2-4) 3 (2-4)
Decrease pain during the day 3 (2-4) 3 (1-3)
Increase joint stability 2 (1-4) 2 (1-4)
Improve hand function during the day 2 (1-3) 2 (1-3)
10c J Mellson,A Hammond, C Laver 2010
Symptoms/issues influencing decision to provide NRS in early
and established rheumatoid arthritis (n=19).
1=low; 5 = high importance Early RA
(< 2 years)
Established
RA(> 2 years)
High levels of night pain 5 (5-5) 5 (5-5)
“Clawing” or strong finger flexion at night 5 (5-5) 5 (5-5)
Maintaining a comfortable hand position at
night/ at rest
5 (4-5) 5 (4-5)
Joint swelling 4 (3-5) 4 (3-5)
Joint changes (eg early deformity
development)
4 (3-5) 4 (3-4)
At patient request as had splint previously 3 (3-5) 4 (3-5)
High levels of day pain 3 (2-4) 3 (2-4)
Presence of pins and needles 3 (2-3) 3 (2-3)
Early morning stiffness in the hands 2 (1-4) 3 (1-4)
Limited range of movement 2 (1-3) 2 (1-3)
11c J Mellson,A Hammond, C Laver 2010
Symptoms/ problems assessedFree text responses: Total
assessing (n)
Standardised
method eg (n)
Pain 12 10 (VAS)
Range of movement 11 4 (goniometer )
Joint swelling 9 4 (ring sizer, tape
measure)
Impact of hand problems (on ADL, work or
leisure)
8 4
Sensation 8 0
Hand function 7 5 (DASH)
Grip/pinch strength 7 5 (Jamar, bulb
dynamometer)
Deformities 6 0
Patient’s attitudes to splints 4 0
Skin colour/ changes 3 0
Hand chart/assessment sheet 4
Stiffness; hand dominance; sleep disturbance 2
12c J Mellson,A Hammond, C Laver 2010
Reasons for non-prescription of RS
1. Psychological: (15/19)
2. Physical
3. Practical
4. Cognitive impairment
5. Recent medication changes/
steroid injections
13
14
Splint patterns: 2. thumbs up 8/136/13 used both designs (1 & 2)
15
16
Example pattern 1 splints:
pronation
17c J Mellson,A Hammond, C Laver 2010
Resting splint positioning7 splinted in one position only; 12 used a 2nd
position at times:
Wrist position (n):
Pronation
Midline
Between pro /mid
8
10
1
Wrist extension ° (median (IQR) 20 (15-25)
MCPJ flexion (median (IQR) 40 (30 – 46.25)
PIPJ flexion (median (IQR) 20 (11.5 – 30)
DIPJ flexion (median (IQR) 5 (0 – 11.25)
Thumb position:
Palmar abduction (n)
Extension/radial abduction (n)
Between abduction/ extension (n)
10
4
5
18c J Mellson,A Hammond, C Laver 2010
Rationale for positioning
“Functional / Resting position”
Comfortable mid-range
Not pulling more on extensors or flexors
Well-tolerated
Promotes sleep in fatigued patients
Minimises stress on joints and structures
Protects structures and minimises
deformity.
19
Splint material
20
Splint Straps
21c J Mellson,A Hammond, C Laver 2010
Short-term splint evaluationNo. Time
(weeks)
Duration
(minutes)
Face to face 14 2(IQR 2– 3.25)
20(IQR 13.5– 27.5)
Telephone 6 2(IQR 2-3)
5(IQR 5-12.5)
None 2
22c J Mellson,A Hammond, C Laver 2010
Long-term splint evaluation
10 = long-term review at some stage when
saw patients
Only 4 did regular review (eg annual
review)
9 conducted no long-term review
All 19 asked patients to contact them if
any problems with splint
23c J Mellson,A Hammond, C Laver 2010
Time and cost of RSOn average it takes 45 minutes (SD 17.32) to:
assess for, make, fit and give instructions in correct resting splint wear and precautions, excluding teaching hand exercises.
Cost of OT time average Band 7@£32/hr (PSSRU figures 2009): £24
Cost per patient of 1 splint + exercise + short-term review = 75 minutes = £40
Splint costs: average cost £29 per splint
Total cost of providing splint + exercises = £69