report on structural elements design

Upload: macrem-macrem

Post on 01-Mar-2018

229 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    1/45

    KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA

    NATION RELIGION KING

    r r[s s

    REPORT ONSTRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CHECK

    OF STEEL ROOF FRAME AND CONNECTION

    (CALCULATION NOTE IN PART-B)

    PROJECT: GUAG HUA G.H GARMENT CO., LTD.

    INSPECTOR: E.T.C ENGINEERING CONSULTANT CO., LTD.

    Location: PHNOM PENH, CAMBODIA.

    Phnom Penh, June, 2016

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    2/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 1

    View - 3D 2

    View - 3D-01 2

    View - 2D Frame_Edge 3

    View - 2D Frame_Interior 3

    View - MY, Cases: 5 (ULS_RAFTER) 4

    View - FZ, Cases: 5 (ULS_RAFTER) 4View:2 - MY, Cases: 6 (ULS_PURLIN) 5

    View:2 - FZ, Cases: 6 (ULS_PURLIN) 5

    Loads - Cases 6

    Loads - Values 6

    Combinations 6

    PURLIN_RESULT SUMMARY 8

    Detail Result of Purlin Capacity Check 10

    RAFTER_RESULT SUMMARY 13

    Detail Result of Rafter Capacity Check 15

    Top Roof Frame_Result Summary 18

    Detail Result of Top Roof Frame Capacity Check 20

    Connection (1) 23

    Connection (1.1) 23

    Connection (1.2) 24

    Connection (2) 37

    Connection (2.1) 38

    Connection (2.2) 39

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    3/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 2

    View - 3D

    17/06/16 11:21

    View - 3D-01

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    4/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 3

    17/06/16 11:21

    View - 2D Frame_Edge

    17/06/16 11:21

    View - 2D Frame_Interior

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    5/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 4

    17/06/16 11:21

    View - MY, Cases: 5 (ULS_RAFTER)

    17/06/16 11:21

    View - FZ, Cases: 5 (ULS_RAFTER)

    17/06/16 11:21

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    6/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 5

    View:2 - MY, Cases: 6 (ULS_PURLIN)

    17/06/16 11:21

    View:2 - FZ, Cases: 6 (ULS_PURLIN)

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    7/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 6

    17/06/16 11:21

    Loads - Cases

    Case Label Case name Nature

    1 SW SW dead

    2 SDL SDL dead

    3 Lr_Rafter Lr_Rafter Roof live

    4 Lr_Purlin Lr_Purlin live

    5 ULS_RAFTER dead

    6 ULS_PURLIN dead

    7 ULS

    8 ULS+

    9 ULS-

    10 SLS

    11SLS+

    12 SLS-

    Case Analysis type

    1 Static - Linear

    2 Static - Linear

    3 Static - Linear

    4 Static - Linear

    5 Linear Combination

    6 Linear Combination

    7 Linear Combination

    8 Linear Combination

    9 Linear Combination

    10 Linear Combination

    11 Linear Combination

    12 Linear Combination

    Loads - Values

    Case Load type List Load values

    1 self-weight 1to1237 1240 PZ Negative Factor=1.00

    2 uniform load 371to1237 12 PZ=-0.09(kN/m)

    3 uniform load 371to1237 12 PZ=-0.26(kN/m)

    4 uniform load 371to1237 12 PZ=-0.43(kN/m)

    Combinations

    - Cases: 5 6

    Combinations Name Analysis typeCombination Case nature

    5 (C) ULS_RAFTER Linear Combinati ULS dead

    6 (C) ULS_PURLIN Linear Combinati ULS dead

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    8/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 7

    Combinations Definition

    5 (C) (1+2)*1.20+3*1.00

    6 (C) (1+2)*1.20+4*1.00

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    9/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 8

    PURLIN_RESULT SUMMARY

    STEEL DESIGN------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ----

    CODE:ANSI/AISC 360-10 An American National Standard, June 22, 2010ANALYSIS TYPE: Member Verification----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    CODE GROUP:MEMBER: 1284 Beam_1284POINT: 1 COORDINATE: x = 0.00 L = 0.00 m----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    LOADS:Governing Load Case: 6 ULS_PURLIN (1+2)*1.20+4*1.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ----MATERIAL:STEEL 235MPa Fy = 235.00 MPa Fu = 360.00 MPa E = 200000.00 MPa------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ----

    SECTION PARAMETERS: Tube:125x50x1.5d=125.0 mm Ay=1.36 cm2 Az=3.62 cm2 Ax=5.16 cm2bf=50.0 mm Iy=102.59 cm4 Iz=24.65 cm4 J=62.58 cm4

    tw=1.5 mm Sy=16.42 cm3 Sz=9.86 cm3tf=1.5 mm Zy=20.43 cm3 Zz=10.75 cm3

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    MEMBER PARAMETERS:

    Ly = 6.00 m Lz = 6.00 m

    Ky = 1.00 Kz = 1.00 Lb = 6.00 mKLy/ry = 134.56 KLz/rz = 274.49 Cb = 2.15------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ----

    INTERNAL FORCES: DESIGN STRENGTHSMry = -3.75 kN*m Fib*Mny = 4.22 kN*m

    Vrz = 2.55 kN Fiv*Vnz = 40.47 kN----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    SAFETY FACTORSFib = 0.90 Fiv = 0.90------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ----

    SECTION ELEMENTS:Flange = Compact Web = Non-compact

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    VERIFICATION FORMULAS:Mry/(Fib*Mny) = 0.89 < 1.00 LRFD (H1-1b) VerifiedVrz/(Fiv*Vnz) = 0.06 < 1.00 LRFD (G2-1) Verified

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    10/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 9

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Section OK ! ! !

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    11/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 10

    Detail Result of Purlin Capacity Check

    Detail Result of Purlin Capacity Check

    Symbol Values Unit Symbol description Section

    MEMBER:1284

    Beam_1284; COORDIN

    ATE: x =0.00 L =0.00 m

    Cross-

    section

    properties:Tube:125x5

    0x1.5

    Ax 5.16 cm2 Cross-section area

    Ay 1.36 cm2 Shear area - Y-axisAz 3.62 cm2 Shear area - Z-axisJ 62.58 cm4 Torsional constant

    Iy 102.59 cm4 Moment of inertia of a section about the Y-axis

    Iz 24.65 cm4 Moment of inertia of a section about the Z-axis

    Zy 20.43 cm3 Plastic section modulus about the Y (major)

    axisSy 16.42 cm3 Elastic section modulus about the Y-axisZz 10.75 cm3 Plastic section modulus about the Z (minor)

    axisSz 9.86 cm3 Elastic section modulus about the Z-axisd 125.0 mm Height of cross-sectionbf 50.0 mm Width of cross-sectiontf 1.5 mm Flange thicknesstw 1.5 mm Web thicknessry 44.6 mm Radius of gyration - Y-axis

    rz 21.9 mm Radius of gyration - Z-axis

    Material:

    Name STEEL 235MPa

    Fy 235.00 MPa Specified minimum yield strength ofmaterial

    Fu 360.00 MPa Specified minimum tensile strength

    E 200000.00

    MPa Longitudinal elasticity coefficient

    Partialfactor

    methodLRFD

    Fib 0.90 Resistance factor for flexure [F1.(1)]

    Fiv 0.90 Resistance factor for shear [G1]

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    12/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 11

    Localbuckling

    Lamf 31.33 Width-To-Thickness ratio for a flange [TableB4.1a,b]

    Lamw 81.33 Width-To-Thickness ratio for a web [Table

    B4.1a,b]Section

    class forsimplebending(Mymoment)

    Lamf_p_My 32.67 Limiting slenderness for compact flange [TableB4.1b]

    Lamf_r_My 40.84 Limiting slenderness for noncompact flange [TableB4.1b]

    ClassF_My Compact Flange class [TableB4.1b]

    Lamw_p_My

    70.60 Limiting slenderness for compact web [TableB4.1b]

    Lamw_r_My

    166.29 Limiting slenderness for noncompact web [TableB4.1b]

    ClassW_My Non-compact

    Web class [TableB4.1b]

    Limitingslenderness for shear

    Lamw_p_Vz

    71.76 Limiting shear slenderness for compactweb

    [G2.1.(b)]

    Lamw_r_Vz 89.37 Limiting shear slenderness for noncompactweb

    [G2.1.(b)]

    Parameters

    of lateralbucklinganalysis:

    Rm 1.00 Cross-section monosymmetry parameter [Comm.F1]

    Cb 2.15 Lateral-torsional buckling modificationfactor

    [F1.(3)]

    Lb 6.00 m Laterally unbraced length of a member(lateral-torsional buckling)

    [F]

    Lpy 2.13 m Limiting laterally unbraced length for thelimit state of yielding [F]

    Lry 78.95 m Limiting laterally unbraced length for thelimit state of inelastic lateral-torsionalbuckling

    [F]

    Other:

    Cw 73331655.5

    mm6 Warping constant [E,F]

    kvz 5.00 Shear buckling coefficient [G2.1]Cvz 0.88 Ratio for critical web stress calculations [G2.1]

    Internalforces

    Mry -3.75 kN*m Required flexural strength

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    13/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 12

    Vrz 2.55 kN Required shear strength

    Nominalstrengths:

    About the

    Y axis of

    cross-section

    Mpy 4.80 kN*m Nominal plastic bending moment [F]

    Mny[YD] 4.80 kN*m Nominal flexural strength in the limit stateof yielding

    [F7.1]

    Mny[WLB] 4.69 kN*m Nominal strength for web local buckling [F7.3]Mny 4.69 kN*m Nominal flexural strength [F7]Vnz 44.97 kN Nominal shear strength [G2.1]

    Designstrengths:

    About theY axis ofcross-section

    Fib*Mpy 4.32 kN*m Design plastic bending moment [F]

    Fib*Mny[YD]

    4.32 kN*m Design flexural strength in the limit state ofyielding

    [F7.1]

    Fib*Mny[WLB]

    4.22 kN*m Design strength for web local buckling [F7.3]

    Fib*Mny 4.22 kN*m Design flexural strength [F7]Fiv*Vnz 40.47 kN Design shear strength [G2.1]

    Verificationformulas:

    UF(H1_1b) 0.89 Mry/(Fib*Mny) Verified

    UF(G2_1) 0.06 Vrz/(Fiv*Vnz) Verified

    Ratio:

    RAT 0.89 Efficiency ratio SectionOK

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    14/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 13

    RAFTER_RESULT SUMMARY

    STEEL DESIGN--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    --------------------CODE:ANSI/AISC 360-10 An American National Standard, June 22, 2010ANALYSIS TYPE: Member Verification----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    CODE GROUP:

    MEMBER: 343 Beam_343POINT: 3 COORDINATE: x = 0.63 L = 7.65 m----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    LOADS:Governing Load Case: 5 ULS_RAFTER (1+2)*1.20+3*1.00

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    MATERIAL:STEEL 235MPa Fy = 235.00 MPa Fu = 360.00 MPa E = 200000.00 MPa--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    --------------------

    SECTION PARAMETERS: I-350x75x7x10d=350.0 mm Ay=15.00 cm2 Az=24.50 cm2 Ax=38.10 cm2

    bf=75.0 mm Iy=6432.58 cm4 Iz=71.26 cm4 J=8.80 cm4

    tw=7.0 mm Sy=367.58 cm3 Sz=19.00 cm3tf=10.0 mm Zy=445.57 cm3 Zz=32.17 cm3

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    MEMBER PARAMETERS:

    Ly = 12.13 m Lz = 12.13 m

    Ky = 1.00 Kz = 1.00 Lb = 0.85 mKLy/ry = 83.96 KLz/rz = 892.43 Cb = 1.00

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    --------------------INTERNAL FORCES: DESIGN STRENGTHSMry = 83.58 kN*m Fib*Mny = 91.04 kN*m

    Vrz = 0.30 kN Fiv*Vnz = 310.90 kN

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    SAFETY FACTORSFib = 0.90 Fiv = 0.90

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    --------------------

    SECTION ELEMENTS:

    Flange = Compact Web = Compact--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    15/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 14

    --------------------

    VERIFICATION FORMULAS:Mry/(Fib*Mny) = 0.92 < 1.00 LRFD (H1-1b) Verified

    Vrz/(Fiv*Vnz) = 0.00 < 1.00 LRFD (G2-1) Verified

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    --------------------Section OK ! ! !

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    16/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 15

    Detail Result of Rafter Capacity Check

    Detail Result of Rafter Capacity Check

    Symbol Values Unit Symbol description Section

    MEMBER:343 Beam_

    343 ;COORDINATE: x = 0.63L = 7.65 m

    Cross-section

    properties:

    I-350x75x7x1

    0

    Ax 38.10 cm2 Cross-section area

    Ay 15.00 cm2 Shear area - Y-axisAz 24.50 cm2 Shear area - Z-axisJ 8.80 cm4 Torsional constant

    Iy 6432.58 cm4 Moment of inertia of a section about the Y-axis

    Iz 71.26 cm4 Moment of inertia of a section about the Z-axis

    Zy 445.57 cm3 Plastic section modulus about the Y (major)

    axisSy 367.58 cm3 Elastic section modulus about the Y-axisZz 32.17 cm3 Plastic section modulus about the Z (minor)

    axisSz 19.00 cm3 Elastic section modulus about the Z-axisd 350.0 mm Height of cross-sectionbf 75.0 mm Width of cross-sectiontf 10.0 mm Flange thicknesstw 7.0 mm Web thicknessry 129.9 mm Radius of gyration - Y-axis

    rz 13.7 mm Radius of gyration - Z-axis

    Material:

    Name STEEL 235MPa

    Fy 235.00 MPa Specified minimum yield strength ofmaterial

    Fu 360.00 MPa Specified minimum tensile strength

    E 200000.00

    MPa Longitudinal elasticity coefficient

    Partialfactor

    methodLRFD

    Fib 0.90 Resistance factor for flexure [F1.(1)]

    Fiv 0.90 Resistance factor for shear [G1]

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    17/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 16

    Localbuckling

    Lamf 3.75 Width-To-Thickness ratio for a flange [TableB4.1a,b]

    Lamw 47.14 Width-To-Thickness ratio for a web [Table

    B4.1a,b]Section

    class forsimplebending(Mymoment)

    Lamf_p_My 11.09 Limiting slenderness for compact flange [TableB4.1b]

    Lamf_r_My 25.28 Limiting slenderness for noncompact flange [TableB4.1b]

    ClassF_My Compact Flange class [TableB4.1b]

    Lamw_p_My

    109.69 Limiting slenderness for compact web [TableB4.1b]

    Lamw_r_My

    166.29 Limiting slenderness for noncompact web [TableB4.1b]

    ClassW_My Compact Web class [TableB4.1b]

    Limitingslenderness for shear

    Lamw_p_Vz

    71.76 Limiting shear slenderness for compactweb

    [G2.1.(b)]

    Lamw_r_Vz 89.37 Limiting shear slenderness for noncompactweb

    [G2.1.(b)]

    Parameters

    of lateralbucklinganalysis:

    Rm 1.00 Cross-section monosymmetry parameter [Comm.F1]

    Cb 1.00 Lateral-torsional buckling modificationfactor

    [F1.(3)]

    Lb 0.85 m Laterally unbraced length of a member(lateral-torsional buckling)

    [F2.2]

    Lpy 0.70 m Limiting laterally unbraced length for thelimit state of yielding [F2.2]

    Lry 2.47 m Limiting laterally unbraced length for thelimit state of inelastic lateral-torsionalbuckling

    [F2.2]

    Other:

    Cw 24926389173.4

    mm6 Warping constant [E,F]

    kvz 5.00 Shear buckling coefficient [G2.1]Cvz 1.00 Ratio for critical web stress calculations [G2.1]

    Internalforces

    Mry 83.58 kN*m Required flexural strength

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    18/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 17

    Vrz 0.30 kN Required shear strength

    Nominalstrengths:

    About the

    Y axis of

    cross-section

    Mpy 104.71 kN*m Nominal plastic bending moment [F]

    Mny[YD] 104.71 kN*m Nominal flexural strength in the limit stateof yielding

    [F2.1]

    Mny[LTB] 101.16 kN*m Nominal lateral-torsional buckling strength [F2.2]Mny1[LTB] 101.00 kN*m Nominal lateral-torsional buckling strength

    (Cb = 1.0)[F2.2]

    Mny 101.16 kN*m Nominal flexural strength [F2]Vnz 345.45 kN Nominal shear strength [G2.1]

    Designstrengths:

    About theY axis of

    cross-section

    Fib*Mpy 94.24 kN*m Design plastic bending moment [F]

    Fib*Mny[YD]

    94.24 kN*m Design flexural strength in the limit state ofyielding

    [F2.1]

    Fib*Mny[LTB]

    91.04 kN*m Design lateral-torsional buckling strength [F2.2]

    Fib*Mny1[LTD]

    90.90 kN*m Design lateral-torsional buckling strength [F2.2]

    Fib*Mny 91.04 kN*m Design flexural strength [F2]

    Fiv*Vnz 310.90 kN Design shear strength [G2.1]

    Verificationformulas:

    UF(H1_1b) 0.92 Mry/(Fib*Mny) Verified

    UF(G2_1) 0.00 Vrz/(Fiv*Vnz) Verified

    Ratio:

    RAT 0.92 Efficiency ratio SectionOK

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    19/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 18

    Top Roof Frame_Result Summary

    STEEL DESIGN--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    --------------------CODE:ANSI/AISC 360-10 An American National Standard, June 22, 2010ANALYSIS TYPE: Member Verification----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    CODE GROUP:

    MEMBER: 1607 Beam_1607 POINT: 3 COORDINATE: x =1.00 L = 2.43 m--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    --------------------

    LOADS:

    Governing Load Case: 6 ULS_PURLIN (1+2)*1.20+4*1.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    MATERIAL:STEEL 235MPa Fy = 235.00 MPa Fu = 360.00 MPa E = 200000.00 MPa

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    SECTION PARAMETERS: Tube:150x65x1.5d=150.0 mm Ay=1.81 cm2 Az=4.37 cm2 Ax=6.36 cm2

    bf=65.0 mm Iy=186.92 cm4 Iz=51.33 cm4 J=125.83 cm4tw=1.5 mm Sy=24.92 cm3 Sz=15.79 cm3

    tf=1.5 mm Zy=30.69 cm3 Zz=17.17 cm3--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    --------------------

    MEMBER PARAMETERS:

    Ly = 2.43 m Lz = 2.43 mKy = 1.00 Kz = 1.00 Lb = 2.43 m

    KLy/ry = 44.74 KLz/rz = 85.37 Cb = 1.00

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    INTERNAL FORCES: DESIGN STRENGTHSMry = -4.39 kN*m Fib*Mny = 5.27 kN*m

    Vrz = -6.51 kN Fiv*Vnz = 37.06 kN--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    --------------------

    SAFETY FACTORSFib = 0.90 Fiv = 0.90

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    SECTION ELEMENTS:Flange = Slender Web = Non-compact

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    20/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 19

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    --------------------

    VERIFICATION FORMULAS:Mry/(Fib*Mny) = 0.83 < 1.00 LRFD (H1-1b) Verified

    Vrz/(Fiv*Vnz) = 0.18 < 1.00 LRFD (G2-1) Verified

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section OK ! ! !

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    21/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 20

    Detail Result of Top Roof Frame Capacity Check

    Detail Result of Top Roof Frame Capacity Check

    Symbol Values Unit Symbol description Section

    MEMBER:

    1607Beam_1607 ;

    COORDINATE: x =

    1.00 L =2.43 m

    Cross-sectionproperties: Tube:15

    0x65x1.5

    Ax 6.36 cm2 Cross-section area

    Ay 1.81 cm2 Shear area - Y-axisAz 4.37 cm2 Shear area - Z-axisJ 125.83 cm4 Torsional constantIy 186.92 cm4 Moment of inertia of a section about the Y-

    axisIz 51.33 cm4 Moment of inertia of a section about the Z-

    axisZy 30.69 cm3 Plastic section modulus about the Y (major)

    axisSy 24.92 cm3 Elastic section modulus about the Y-axisZz 17.17 cm3 Plastic section modulus about the Z (minor)

    axis

    Sz 15.79 cm3 Elastic section modulus about the Z-axisd 150.0 mm Height of cross-sectionbf 65.0 mm Width of cross-sectiontf 1.5 mm Flange thicknesstw 1.5 mm Web thicknessry 54.2 mm Radius of gyration - Y-axisrz 28.4 mm Radius of gyration - Z-axis

    Material:

    Name STEEL 235MPa

    Fy 235.00 MPa Specified minimum yield strength ofmaterial

    Fu 360.00 MPa Specified minimum tensile strengthE 200000.0

    0MPa Longitudinal elasticity coefficient

    Partialfactor

    methodLRFD

    Fib 0.90 Resistance factor for flexure [F1.(1)]

    Fiv 0.90 Resistance factor for shear [G1]

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    22/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 21

    Localbuckling

    Lamf 41.33 Width-To-Thickness ratio for a flange [TableB4.1a,b]

    Lamw 98.00 Width-To-Thickness ratio for a web [Table

    B4.1a,b]Section

    class forsimplebending(Mymoment)

    Lamf_p_My

    32.67 Limiting slenderness for compact flange [TableB4.1b]

    Lamf_r_My

    40.84 Limiting slenderness for noncompact flange [TableB4.1b]

    ClassF_My

    Slender Flange class [TableB4.1b]

    Lamw_p_My

    70.60 Limiting slenderness for compact web [TableB4.1b]

    Lamw_r_My

    166.29 Limiting slenderness for noncompact web [TableB4.1b]

    ClassW_My

    Non-compact

    Web class [TableB4.1b]

    Limiting

    slenderness forshear

    Lamw_p_Vz

    71.76 Limiting shear slenderness for compactweb

    [G2.1.(b)]

    Lamw_r_Vz

    89.37 Limiting shear slenderness for noncompactweb

    [G2.1.(b)]

    Parameter

    s oflateral

    bucklinganalysis:

    Rm 1.00 Cross-section monosymmetry parameter [Comm.F1]

    Cb 1.00 Lateral-torsional buckling modificationfactor

    [F1.(3)]

    Lb 2.43 m Laterally unbraced length of a member(lateral-torsional buckling)

    [F]

    Lpy 2.90 m Limiting laterally unbraced length for thelimit state of yielding

    [F]

    Lry 106.39 m Limiting laterally unbraced length for the

    limit state of inelastic lateral-torsionalbuckling

    [F]

    Other:

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    23/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 22

    Cw 189401042.8

    mm6 Warping constant [E,F]

    kvz 5.00 Shear buckling coefficient [G2.1]Cvz 0.67 Ratio for critical web stress calculations [G2.1]

    Internal

    forces

    Mry -4.39 kN*m Required flexural strength

    Vrz -6.51 kN Required shear strength

    Nominalstrengths:

    Aboutthe Y axis

    of cross-section

    Mpy 7.21 kN*m Nominal plastic bending moment [F]

    Mny[YD] 7.21 kN*m Nominal flexural strength in the limit stateof yielding [F7.1]

    Mny[FLB] 5.85 kN*m Nominal strength for local buckling of acompression flange

    [F7.2]

    Mny[WLB]

    6.82 kN*m Nominal strength for web local buckling [F7.3]

    Mny 5.85 kN*m Nominal flexural strength [F7]Vnz 41.18 kN Nominal shear strength [G2.1]

    Designstrengths:

    Aboutthe Y axis

    of cross-section

    Fib*Mpy 6.49 kN*m Design plastic bending moment [F]

    Fib*Mny[YD]

    6.49 kN*m Design f lexural strength in the limit state ofyielding

    [F7.1]

    Fib*Mny[FLB]

    5.27 kN*m Design strength for local buckling of acompression flange

    [F7.2]

    Fib*Mny[WLB]

    6.14 kN*m Design strength for web local buckling [F7.3]

    Fib*Mny 5.27 kN*m Design flexural strength [F7]Fiv*Vnz 37.06 kN Design shear strength [G2.1]

    Verificatio

    n formulas:

    UF(H1_1b)

    0.83 Mry/(Fib*Mny) Verified

    UF(G2_1) 0.18 Vrz/(Fiv*Vnz) Verified

    Ratio:

    RAT 0.83 Efficiency ratio SectionOK

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    24/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 23

    Connection (1)

    Connection (1.1)

    1011

    75

    10

    80

    100

    100100100100

    180

    100

    100

    40

    I-350x75

    x7x10

    1200

    1213

    75x10-1

    200

    7

    I-350x75x7x10

    1200

    1213

    75x10-1200

    7

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    25/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 24

    Connection (1.2)

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017

    Design of fixed beam-to-beam connectionEN 1993-1-8:2005/AC:2009

    Ratio

    0.32

    GENERAL

    Connection no.: 1Connection nam e:Beam-Beam

    Structure node: 211

    Structure bars : 141, 142

    GEOMETRY

    LEFTSIDE

    BEAM

    Section:I-350x75x7x10

    Bar no.: 141

    = -165.7 [Deg] Inclination angleh

    bl= 350 [mm] Height of beam section

    bfbl

    = 75 [mm] Width of beam section

    twbl

    = 7 [mm] Thickness of the web of beam section

    tfbl

    = 10 [mm] Thickness of the flange of beam section

    Abl

    = 38.10 [cm2] Cross -sectional area of a beam

    Ixbl

    = 6432.58 [cm4] Moment of inertia of the beam section

    Material:STEEL 235MPafyb

    = 235.00 [MPa] Res is tance

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    26/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 25

    RIGHTSIDE

    BEAM

    Section:I-350x75x7x10

    Bar no.: 142

    = -14.3 [Deg] Inclination angleh

    br= 350 [mm] Height of beam section

    bfbr

    = 75 [mm] Width of beam section

    twbr

    = 7 [mm] Thickness of the web of beam section

    tfbr

    = 10 [mm] Thickness of the flange of beam section

    Abr

    = 38.10 [cm2] Cross -sectional area of a beam

    Ixbr

    = 6432.58 [cm4] Moment of inertia of the beam section

    Material:STEEL 235MPa

    fyb

    = 235.00 [MPa] Res is tance

    BOLTS

    The shear plane pass es through the UNTHREADED portion of the bolt.

    d = 13 [mm] Bolt diameter

    Class =A307 Bolt class

    FtRd

    = 37.66 [kN] Tensile resistance of a bolt

    nh= 2 Number of bolt columns

    nv= 9 Number of bolt rows

    h1= 80 [mm] Distance between first bolt and upper edge of front plateHorizontal spacing e

    i=40 [mm]

    Vertical spacing pi= 100;100;180;100;100;100;100;100 [mm]

    PLATE

    hpr

    = 1011 [mm] Plate height

    bpr

    = 75 [mm] Plate width

    tpr

    = 10 [mm] Plate th ickness

    Material:STEEL 235MPa

    fypr

    = 235.00 [MPa] Res is tance

    LOWERSTIFFENER

    wrd

    = 75 [mm] Plate width

    tfrd

    = 10 [mm] Flange th ickness

    hrd

    = 540 [mm] Plate height

    twrd

    = 7 [mm] Web thickness

    lrd

    = 1213 [mm] Plate length

    d= 11.5 [Deg] Inclination angle

    Material:STEEL 235MPa

    fybu

    = 235.00 [MPa] Res is tance

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    27/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 26

    FILLETWELDS

    aw

    = 3 [mm] Web weld

    af= 3 [m m] Flange weld

    afd

    =3 [mm] Horizontal weld

    MATERIALFACTORS

    M0

    = 1.00 Partial safety factor [2.2]

    M1

    = 1.00 Partial safety factor [2.2]

    M2

    = 1.25 Partial safety factor [2.2]

    M3

    = 1.25 Partial safety factor [2.2]

    LOADS

    Ultimate limit state

    Case:5: ULS_RAFTER (1+2)*1.20+3*1.00

    Mb1,Ed

    =-35.01 [kN*m] Bending moment in the right beam

    Vb1,Ed

    = -0.08 [kN] Shear force in the right beam

    Nb1,Ed

    = -69.48 [kN] Axial force in the right beam

    RESULTS

    BEAMRESISTANCES

    COMPRESSION

    Ab= 38.10 [cm

    2] Area EN1993-1-1:[6.2.4]

    Ncb,Rd

    = Abf

    yb/

    M0

    Ncb,Rd

    =895.35 [kN] Design compressive resistance of the section EN1993-1-1:[6.2.4]

    SHEAR

    Avb

    = 60.90 [cm2] Shear area EN1993-1-1:[6.2.6.(3)]

    Vcb,Rd

    = Avb

    (fyb

    / 3) / M0

    Vcb,Rd= 826.27 [kN] Design sectional resistance for shear EN1993-1-1:[6.2.6.(2)]

    Vb1,Ed

    / Vcb,Rd

    1,0 0.00 < 1.00 verified (0.00)

    BENDING - PLASTIC MOMENT (WITHOUT BRACKETS)

    Wplb

    = 484.38 [cm3] Plastic section modulus EN1993-1-1:[6.2.5.(2)]

    Mb,pl,Rd

    = Wplb

    fyb

    / M0

    Mb,pl,Rd

    =113.83 [kN*m] Plastic resistance of the section for bending (without stiffeners) EN1993-1-1:[6.2.5.(2)]

    BENDING ON THE CONTACT SURFACE WITH PLATE OR CONNECTED ELEMENT

    Wpl

    = 1554.54 [cm3] Plastic section modulus EN1993-1-1:[6.2.5]

    Mcb,Rd

    = Wpl

    fyb

    / M0

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    28/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 27

    Mcb,Rd

    =365.32 [kN*m] Design resistance of the section for bending EN1993-1-1:[6.2.5]

    FLANGE AND WEB - COMPRESSION

    Mcb,Rd

    =365.32 [kN*m] Design resistance of the section for bending EN1993-1-1:[6.2.5]

    hf= 891 [mm] Distance between the centroids of flanges [6.2.6.7.(1)]

    Fc,fb,Rd

    = Mcb,Rd

    / hf

    Fc,fb,Rd

    =410.02 [kN] Resistance of the compressed flange and web [6.2.6.7.(1)]

    WEB OR BRACKET FLANGE - COMPRESSION - LEVEL OF THE BEAM BOTTOM FLANGE

    Bearing:

    = 14.3 [Deg] Angle between the front plate and the beam= 11.5 [Deg] Inclination angle of the bracket plateb

    eff,c,wb= 116 [mm] Effective width of the web for compression [6.2.6.2.(1)]

    Avb= 23.10 [cm2] Shear area EN1993-1-1:[6.2.6.(3)]

    = 0.93 Reduction factor for interaction with shear [6.2.6.2.(1)]

    com,Ed=0.00 [MPa] Maximum compressive stress in web [6.2.6.2.(2)]

    kwc

    = 1.00 Reduction factor conditioned by compressive stresses [6.2.6.2.(2)]

    Fc,wb,Rd1

    = [kwc

    beff,c,wb

    twb

    fyb

    / M0

    ] cos() / sin(- )

    Fc,wb,Rd1

    =398.05 [kN] Beam web resistance [6.2.6.2.(1)]

    Buckling:

    dwb

    = 316 [mm] Height of compressed web [6.2.6.2.(1)]

    p= 0.87 Plate slenderness of an element [6.2.6.2.(1)]

    = 0.88 Reduction factor for element buckling [6.2.6.2.(1)]

    Fc,wb,Rd2

    = [kwc

    beff,c,wb

    twb

    fyb

    / M1

    ] cos() / sin(- )

    Fc,wb,Rd2

    =351.15 [kN] Beam web resistance [6.2.6.2.(1)]

    Res istance of the bracket flange

    Fc,wb,Rd3

    = bbt

    bf

    yb/ (0.8*

    M0)

    Fc,wb,Rd3

    =220.31 [kN] Resistance of the bracket flange [6.2.6.7.(1)]

    Final resis tance:

    Fc,wb,Rd,low

    = Min (Fc,wb,Rd1

    , Fc,wb,Rd2

    , Fc,wb,Rd3

    )

    Fc,wb,Rd,low

    =220.31 [kN] Beam web resistance [6.2.6.2.(1)]

    GEOMETRICALPARAMETERSOFACONNECTION

    EFFECTIVE LENGTHS AND PARAMETERS - FRONT PLATE

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    29/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 28

    Nr m mx e ex p leff,cp leff,nc leff,1 leff,2 leff,cp,g leff,nc,g leff,1,g leff,2,g

    113 45 18 51 108 178 38 38 38 - - - -

    213 - 18 - 100 82 76 76 76 141 89 89 89

    313 - 18 - 100 82 74 74 74 200 100 100 100

    413 - 18 - 100 82 74 74 74 200 100 100 100

    513 - 18 - 100 82 74 74 74 200 100 100 100

    613 - 18 - 140 82 74 74 74 280 140 140 140

    713 - 18 - 140 82 74 74 74 280 140 140 140

    813 - 18 - 100 82 74 74 74 200 100 100 100

    913 - 18 - 100 82 74 74 74 141 87 87 87

    m Bolt dis tance from the web

    mx Bol t distance from the beam flange

    e Bolt dis tance from the outer edge

    ex Bol t distance from the horizontal outer edge

    p Distance between boltsleff,cp Effective length for a single bolt in the circular failure mode

    leff,nc Effective length for a single bolt in the non-circular failure m ode

    leff,1 Effective length for a single bolt for mode 1

    leff,2 Effective length for a single bolt for mode 2

    leff,cp,g Effective length for a group of bolts in the circular failure mode

    leff,nc,g Effective length for a group of bolts in the non-circular failure mode

    leff,1,g Effective length for a group of bolts for mode 1

    leff,2,g Effective length for a group of bolts for mode 2

    CONNECTIONRESISTANCEFORCOMPRESSION

    Nj,Rd

    = Min ( Ncb,Rd

    2 Fc,wb,Rd,low

    )

    Nj,Rd

    = 440.63 [kN] Connection resistance for compression [6.2]

    Nb1,Ed

    / Nj,Rd

    1,0 0.16 < 1.00 verified (0.16)

    CONNECTIONRESISTANCEFORBENDING

    Ft,Rd

    = 37.66 [kN] Bolt resistance for tension [Table 3.4]

    Bp,Rd

    = 103.42 [kN] Punching shear resistance of a bolt [Table 3.4]

    Ft,fc,Rd colum n flange resistance due to bending

    Ft,wc,Rd colum n web res is tance due to tension

    Ft,ep,Rd res istance of the front plate due to bending

    Ft,wb,Rd res istance of the web in tension

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    30/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 29

    Ft,fc,Rd

    = Min (FT,1,fc,Rd

    , FT,2,fc,Rd

    , FT,3,fc,Rd

    ) [6.2.6.4] , [Tab.6.2]

    Ft,wc,Rd

    = beff,t,wc

    twc

    fyc

    / M0 [6.2.6.3.(1)]

    Ft,ep,Rd

    = Min (FT,1,ep,Rd

    , FT,2,ep,Rd

    , FT,3,ep,Rd

    ) [6.2.6.5] , [Tab.6.2]

    Ft,wb,Rd

    = beff,t,wb

    twb

    fyb

    / M0 [6.2.6.8.(1)]

    RESISTANCE OF THE BOLT ROW NO. 1

    Ft1,Rd,comp- Formula Ft1,Rd,comp Component

    Ft,ep,Rd(1)

    = 19.42 19.42 Front plate - tens ion

    Bp,Rd

    = 206.83 206.83 Bolts due to shear punching

    Fc,fb,Rd

    = 410.02 410.02 Beam flange - compress ion

    Ft1,Rd

    = Min (Ft1,Rd,comp

    ) 19.42 Bolt row resis tance

    RESISTANCE OF THE BOLT ROW NO. 2

    Ft2,Rd,comp- Formula Ft2,Rd,comp Component

    Ft,ep,Rd(2)

    = 72.13 72.13 Front plate - tens ion

    Ft,wb,Rd(2)

    = 125.01 125.01 Beam web - tension

    Bp,Rd

    = 206.83 206.83 Bolts due to shear punching

    Fc,fb,Rd

    - 1

    1F

    tj,Rd= 410.02 - 19.42 390.60 Beam flange - compress ion

    Ft2,Rd

    = Min (Ft2,Rd,comp

    ) 72.13 Bolt row resis tance

    RESISTANCE OF THE BOLT ROW NO. 3

    Ft3,Rd,comp- Formula Ft3,Rd,comp Component

    Ft,ep,Rd(3)

    = 71.45 71.45 Front plate - tens ion

    Ft,wb,Rd(3)

    = 122.22 122.22 Beam web - tension

    Bp,Rd

    = 206.83 206.83 Bolts due to shear punching

    Fc,fb,Rd

    - 1

    2F

    tj,Rd= 410.02 - 91.55 318.47 Beam flange - compress ion

    Ft,ep,Rd(3 + 2 )

    - 2

    2F

    tj,Rd= 150.66 - 72.13 78.53 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(3 + 2)

    - 2

    2F

    tj,Rd= 310.65 - 72.13 238.52 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(3 + 2 )- 22

    Ftj,Rd= 150.66 - 72.13 78.53 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(3 + 2)

    - 2

    2F

    tj,Rd= 310.65 - 72.13 238.52 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft3,Rd

    = Min (Ft3,Rd,comp

    ) 71.45 Bolt row resis tance

    Additional reduction of the bolt row resistance

    Ft3,Rd

    = Ft2,Rd

    h3/h

    2

    Ft3,Rd

    = 63.59 [kN] Reduced bolt row resistance [6.2.7.2.(9)]

    RESISTANCE OF THE BOLT ROW NO. 4

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    31/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 30

    Ft4,Rd,comp- Formula Ft4,Rd,comp Component

    Ft,ep,Rd(4)

    = 71.45 71.45 Front plate - tens ion

    Ft,wb,Rd(4)

    = 122.22 122.22 Beam web - tension

    Bp,Rd

    = 206.83 206.83 Bolts due to shear punching

    Fc,fb,Rd- 13Ftj,Rd= 410.02 - 155.14 254.88 Beam flange - compress ion

    Ft,ep,Rd(4 + 3 )

    - 3

    3F

    tj,Rd= 150.66 - 63.59 87.06 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(4 + 3)

    - 3

    3F

    tj,Rd= 329.00 - 63.59 265.41 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(4 + 3 + 2)

    - 3

    2F

    tj,Rd= 225.98 - 135.72 90.26 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(4 + 3 + 2)

    - 3

    2F

    tj,Rd= 475.15 - 135.72 339.43 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(4 + 3 + 2)

    - 3

    2F

    tj,Rd= 225.98 - 135.72 90.26 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(4 + 3 + 2)

    - 3

    2F

    tj,Rd= 475.15 - 135.72 339.43 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft4,Rd

    = Min (Ft4,Rd,comp

    ) 71.45 Bolt row resis tance

    Additional reduction of the bolt row resistance

    Ft4,Rd

    = Ft2,Rd

    h4/h

    2

    Ft4,Rd

    = 55.05 [kN] Reduced bolt row resistance [6.2.7.2.(9)]

    RESISTANCE OF THE BOLT ROW NO. 5

    Ft5,Rd,comp- Formula Ft5,Rd,comp Component

    Ft,ep,Rd(5)

    = 71.45 71.45 Front plate - tens ion

    Ft,wb,Rd(5)

    = 122.22 122.22 Beam web - tension

    Bp,Rd

    = 206.83 206.83 Bolts due to shear punching

    Fc,fb,Rd

    - 1

    4F

    tj,Rd= 410.02 - 210.20 199.83 Beam flange - compress ion

    Ft,ep,Rd(5 + 4 )

    - 4

    4F

    tj,Rd= 150.66 - 55.05 95.60 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(5 + 4)

    - 4

    4F

    tj,Rd= 329.00 - 55.05 273.95 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(5 + 4 + 3)

    - 4

    3F

    tj,Rd= 225.98 - 118.65 107.34 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(5 + 4 + 3)

    - 4

    3F

    tj,Rd= 493.50 - 118.65 374.85 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(5 + 4 + 3 + 2)- 42Ftj,Rd= 301.31 - 190.78 110.54 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(5 + 4 + 3 + 2)

    - 4

    2F

    tj,Rd= 639.65 - 190.78 448.87 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(5 + 4 + 3 + 2)

    - 4

    2F

    tj,Rd= 301.31 - 190.78 110.54 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(5 + 4 + 3 + 2)

    - 4

    2F

    tj,Rd= 639.65 - 190.78 448.87 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft5,Rd

    = Min (Ft5,Rd,comp

    ) 71.45 Bolt row resis tance

    Additional reduction of the bolt row resistance

    Ft5,Rd

    = Ft2,Rd

    h5/h

    2

    Ft5,Rd

    = 46.52 [kN] Reduced bolt row resistance [6.2.7.2.(9)]

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    32/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 31

    RESISTANCE OF THE BOLT ROW NO. 6

    Ft6,Rd,comp- Formula Ft6,Rd,comp Component

    Ft,ep,Rd(6)

    = 71.45 71.45 Front plate - tens ion

    Ft,wb,Rd(6)

    = 122.22 122.22 Beam web - tension

    Bp,Rd

    = 206.83 206.83 Bolts due to shear punching

    Fc,fb,Rd

    - 1

    5F

    tj,Rd= 410.02 - 256.71 153.31 Beam flange - compress ion

    Ft,ep,Rd(6 + 5 )

    - 5

    5F

    tj,Rd= 150.66 - 46.52 104.14 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(6 + 5)

    - 5

    5F

    tj,Rd= 394.80 - 46.52 348.28 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(6 + 5 + 4)

    - 5

    4F

    tj,Rd= 225.98 - 101.57 124.41 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(6 + 5 + 4)

    - 5

    4F

    tj,Rd= 559.30 - 101.57 457.73 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(6 + 5 + 4 + 3)

    - 5

    3F

    tj,Rd= 301.31 - 165.16 136.15 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(6 + 5 + 4 + 3)- 53Ftj,Rd= 723.80 - 165.16 558.64 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2)

    - 5

    2F

    tj,Rd= 376.64 - 237.29 139.35 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2)

    - 5

    2F

    tj,Rd= 869.95 - 237.29 632.66 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2)

    - 5

    2F

    tj,Rd= 376.64 - 237.29 139.35 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2)

    - 5

    2F

    tj,Rd= 869.95 - 237.29 632.66 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft6,Rd

    = Min (Ft6,Rd,comp

    ) 71.45 Bolt row resis tance

    Additional reduction of the bolt row resistance

    Ft6,Rd

    = Ft2,Rd

    h6/h

    2

    Ft6,Rd

    = 37.98 [kN] Reduced bolt row resistance [6.2.7.2.(9)]

    RESISTANCE OF THE BOLT ROW NO. 7

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    33/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 32

    Ft7,Rd,comp- Formula Ft7,Rd,comp Component

    Ft,ep,Rd(7)

    = 71.45 71.45 Front plate - tens ion

    Ft,wb,Rd(7)

    = 122.22 122.22 Beam web - tension

    Bp,Rd

    = 206.83 206.83 Bolts due to shear punching

    Fc,fb,Rd- 16Ftj,Rd= 410.02 - 294.69 115.33 Beam flange - compress ion

    Ft,ep,Rd(7 + 6 )

    - 6

    6F

    tj,Rd= 150.66 - 37.98 112.68 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(7 + 6)

    - 6

    6F

    tj,Rd= 460.60 - 37.98 422.62 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(7 + 6 + 5)

    - 6

    5F

    tj,Rd= 225.98 - 84.50 141.49 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(7 + 6 + 5)

    - 6

    5F

    tj,Rd= 625.10 - 84.50 540.60 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(7 + 6 + 5 + 4)

    - 6

    4F

    tj,Rd= 301.31 - 139.55 161.76 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(7 + 6 + 5 + 4)

    - 6

    4F

    tj,Rd= 789.60 - 139.55 650.05 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3)- 6

    3

    Ftj,Rd= 376.64 - 203.14 173.50 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3)

    - 6

    3F

    tj,Rd= 954.10 - 203.14 750.96 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2 )

    - 6

    2F

    tj,Rd= 451.97 - 275.27 176.70 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2)

    - 6

    2F

    tj,Rd= 1100.25 - 275.27824.98 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2 )

    - 6

    2F

    tj,Rd= 451.97 - 275.27 176.70 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2)

    - 6

    2F

    tj,Rd= 1100.25 - 275.27824.98 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft7,Rd

    = Min (Ft7,Rd,comp

    ) 71.45 Bolt row resis tance

    Additional reduction of the bolt row resistance

    Ft7,Rd

    = Ft2,Rd

    h7/h

    2

    Ft7,Rd

    = 22.61 [kN] Reduced bolt row resistance [6.2.7.2.(9)]

    RESISTANCE OF THE BOLT ROW NO. 8

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    34/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 33

    Ft8,Rd,comp- Formula Ft8,Rd,comp Component

    Ft,ep,Rd(8)

    = 71.45 71.45 Front plate - tens ion

    Ft,wb,Rd(8)

    = 122.22 122.22 Beam web - tension

    Bp,Rd

    = 206.83 206.83 Bolts due to shear punching

    Fc,fb,Rd- 17Ftj,Rd= 410.02 - 317.30 92.72 Beam flange - compress ion

    Ft,ep,Rd(8 + 7 )

    - 7

    7F

    tj,Rd= 150.66 - 22.61 128.04 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(8 + 7)

    - 7

    7F

    tj,Rd= 394.80 - 22.61 372.19 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(8 + 7 + 6)

    - 7

    6F

    tj,Rd= 225.98 - 60.59 165.39 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(8 + 7 + 6)

    - 7

    6F

    tj,Rd= 625.10 - 60.59 564.51 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(8 + 7 + 6 + 5)

    - 7

    5F

    tj,Rd= 301.31 - 107.11 194.20 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(8 + 7 + 6 + 5)

    - 7

    5F

    tj,Rd= 789.60 - 107.11 682.49 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4)- 7

    4

    Ftj,Rd= 376.64 - 162.16 214.48 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4)

    - 7

    4F

    tj,Rd= 954.10 - 162.16 791.94 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 )

    - 7

    3F

    tj,Rd= 451.97 - 225.75 226.21 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3)

    - 7

    3F

    tj,Rd= 1118.60 - 225.75 892.85 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2)

    - 7

    2F

    tj,Rd= 527.30 - 297.88229.41 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2)

    - 7

    2F

    tj,Rd= 1264.75 - 297.88966.87 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2)

    - 7

    2F

    tj,Rd= 527.30 - 297.88229.41 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2)

    - 7

    2F

    tj,Rd= 1264.75 - 297.88966.87 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft8,Rd

    = Min (Ft8,Rd,comp

    ) 71.45 Bolt row resis tance

    Additional reduction of the bolt row resistance

    Ft8,Rd

    = Ft2,Rd

    h8/h

    2

    Ft8,Rd

    = 14.07 [kN] Reduced bolt row resistance [6.2.7.2.(9)]

    RESISTANCE OF THE BOLT ROW NO. 9

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    35/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 34

    Ft9,Rd,comp- Formula Ft9,Rd,comp Component

    Ft,ep,Rd(9)

    = 71.45 71.45 Front plate - tens ion

    Ft,wb,Rd(9)

    = 122.22 122.22 Beam web - tension

    Bp,Rd

    = 206.83 206.83 Bolts due to shear punching

    Fc,fb,Rd- 18Ftj,Rd= 410.02 - 331.38 78.65 Beam flange - compress ion

    Ft,ep,Rd(9 + 8 )

    - 8

    8F

    tj,Rd= 150.66 - 14.07 136.58 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(9 + 8)

    - 8

    8F

    tj,Rd= 307.86 - 14.07 293.79 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(9 + 8 + 7)

    - 8

    7F

    tj,Rd= 225.98 - 36.68 189.30 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(9 + 8 + 7)

    - 8

    7F

    tj,Rd= 538.16 - 36.68 501.48 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(9 + 8 + 7 + 6)

    - 8

    6F

    tj,Rd= 301.31 - 74.66 226.65 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(9 + 8 + 7 + 6)

    - 8

    6F

    tj,Rd= 768.46 - 74.66 693.80 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(9 + 8 + 7 + 6 + 5)- 8

    5

    Ftj,Rd= 376.64 - 121.18 255.46 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(9 + 8 + 7 + 6 + 5)

    - 8

    5F

    tj,Rd= 932.96 - 121.18 811.78 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(9 + 8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 )

    - 8

    4F

    tj,Rd= 451.97 - 176.23 275.73 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(9 + 8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4)

    - 8

    4F

    tj,Rd= 1097.46 - 176.23 921.23 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(9 + 8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3)

    - 8

    3F

    tj,Rd= 527.30 - 239.83 287.47 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(9 + 8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3)

    - 8

    3F

    tj,Rd= 1261.96 - 239.83 1022.13 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft,ep,Rd(9 + 8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2)

    - 8

    2F

    tj,Rd= 602.62 - 311.96 290.67 Front plate - tens ion - group

    Ft,wb,Rd(9 + 8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2)

    - 8

    2F

    tj,Rd= 1408.11 - 311.961096.15 Beam web - tension - group

    Ft9,Rd

    = Min (Ft9,Rd,comp

    ) 71.45 Bolt row resis tance

    Additional reduction of the bolt row resistance

    Ft9,Rd

    = Ft2,Rd

    h9/h

    2

    Ft9,Rd

    = 5.54 [kN] Reduced bolt row resistance [6.2.7.2.(9)]

    SUMMARY TABLE OF FORCES

    Nr hj Ftj,Rd Ft,fc,Rd Ft,wc,Rd Ft,ep,Rd Ft,wb,Rd Ft,Rd Bp,Rd

    1945 19.42 - - 19.42 - 75.33 206.83

    2845 72.13 - - 72.13 125.01 75.33 206.83

    3745 63.59 - - 71.45 122.22 75.33 206.83

    4645 55.05 - - 71.45 122.22 75.33 206.83

    5545 46.52 - - 71.45 122.22 75.33 206.83

    6445 37.98 - - 71.45 122.22 75.33 206.83

    7265 22.61 - - 71.45 122.22 75.33 206.83

    8165 14.07 - - 71.45 122.22 75.33 206.83

    965 5.54 - - 71.45 122.22 75.33 206.83

    CONNECTION RESISTANCE FOR BENDING Mj ,Rd

    Mj,Rd

    = hjF

    tj,Rd

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    36/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 35

    Mj,Rd

    = 213.06 [kN*m] Connection resistance for bending [6.2]

    Mb1,Ed

    / Mj,Rd

    1,0 0.16 < 1.00 verified (0.16)

    VERIFICATIONOFM+N INTERACTIONM

    b1,Ed/ M

    j,Rd+ N

    b1,Ed/ N

    j,Rd 1 [6.2.5.1.(3)]

    Mb1,Ed

    / Mj,Rd

    + Nb1,Ed

    / Nj,Rd 0.32 < 1.00 verified (0.32)

    CONNECTIONRESISTANCEFORSHEAR

    v= 0.60 Coefficient for calculation of Fv,Rd [Table 3.4]

    Lf

    = 0.75 Reduction factor for long connections [3.8]

    Fv,Rd= 18.87 [kN] Shear resistance of a single bolt [Table 3.4]F

    t,Rd,max= 37.66 [kN] Tensile resistance of a single bolt [Table 3.4]

    Fb,Rd,int

    = 87.33 [kN] Bearing resistance of an intermediate bolt [Table 3.4]

    Fb,Rd,ext

    = 68.64 [kN] Bearing resistance of an outermost bolt [Table 3.4]

    Nr Ftj,Rd,N Ftj,Ed,N Ftj,Rd,M Ftj,Ed,M Ftj,Ed Fvj,Rd

    1 75.33 -7.72 19.42 3.19 -4.53 37.73

    2 75.33 -7.72 72.13 11.85 4.13 36.25

    3 75.33 -7.72 63.59 10.45 2.73 36.75

    4 75.33 -7.72 55.05 9.05 1.33 37.26

    5 75.33 -7.72 46.52 7.64 -0.08 37.73

    6 75.33 -7.72 37.98 6.24 -1.48 37.73

    7 75.33 -7.72 22.61 3.72 -4.00 37.73

    8 75.33 -7.72 14.07 2.31 -5.41 37.73

    9 75.33 -7.72 5.54 0.91 -6.81 37.73

    Ftj,Rd,N Bolt row res istance for simple tens ion

    Ftj,Ed,N Force due to axial force in a bol t row

    Ftj,Rd,M Bolt row res istance for simple bending

    Ftj,Ed,M Force due to moment in a bolt row

    Ftj,Ed Maximum tensi le force in a bolt row

    Fvj,Rd Reduced bolt row resistance

    Ftj,Ed,N

    = Nj,Ed

    Ftj,Rd,N

    / Nj,Rd

    Ftj,Ed,M

    = Mj,Ed

    Ftj,Rd,M

    / Mj,Rd

    Ftj,Ed

    = Ftj,Ed,N

    + Ftj,Ed,M

    Fvj,Rd

    = Min (nhF

    v,Ed(1 - F

    tj,Ed/ (1.4 n

    hF

    t,Rd,max), n

    hF

    v,Rd, n

    hF

    b,Rd))

    Vj,Rd= nh1n

    Fvj,Rd [Table 3.4]

    Vj,Rd

    = 336.65 [kN] Connection resistance for shear [Table 3.4]

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    37/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 36

    Vb1,Ed

    / Vj,Rd

    1,0 0.00 < 1.00 verified (0.00)

    WELDRESISTANCE

    Aw

    = 64.52 [cm2]Area of all welds [4.5.3.2(2)]

    Awy

    = 12.30 [cm2]Area of horizontal welds [4.5.3.2(2)]

    Awz

    = 52.22 [cm2]Area of vertical welds [4.5.3.2(2)]

    Iwy

    = 51138.36 [cm4] Moment of inertia of the weld arrangem ent with respect to the hor. axis [4.5.3.2(5)]

    max=max= -21.05 [MPa] Normal stress in a weld [4.5.3.2(5)]

    == -20.78 [MPa] Stress in a vertical weld [4.5.3.2(5)]

    II= -0.01 [MPa] Tangent stress [4.5.3.2(5)]

    w

    = 0.80 Correlation coefficient [4.5.3.2(7)]

    [max

    2+ 3*(

    max

    2)] f

    u

    /(w

    *M2

    ) 42.10 < 360.00 verified (0.12)

    [2+ 3*(

    2+

    II2)] f

    u/(

    w*

    M2) 41.55 < 360.00 verified (0.12)

    0.9*fu/M2 21.05 < 259.20 verified (0.08)

    CONNECTIONSTIFFNESS

    twash

    = 3 [mm] Washer thickness [6.2.6.3.(2)]

    hhead

    = 9 [mm] Bolt head height [6.2.6.3.(2)]

    hnut

    = 13 [mm] Bolt nut height [6.2.6.3.(2)]

    L

    b

    = 37 [mm] Bolt length [6.2.6.3.(2)]

    k10

    = 5 [mm] Stiffness coefficient of bolts [6.3.2.(1)]

    STIFFNESSES OF BOLT ROWS

    Nr hj k3 k4 k5 keff,j keff,j hj

    keff,j

    hj2

    1 945 0 0 1.65 156.09

    2 845 30 4 34.07 2878.47

    3 745 30 4 29.86 2223.90

    4 645 30 4 25.85 1666.84

    5 545 30 4 21.84 1189.95

    6 445 30 4 17.83 793.23

    7 265 30 4 10.62 281.16

    8 165 30 4 6.61 108.92

    9 65 30 4 2.60 16.85

    Sum 150.92 9315.41

    keff,j

    = 1 / (3

    5(1 / k

    i,j)) [6.3.3.1.(2)]

    zeq

    = jk

    eff,jh

    j2/

    jk

    eff,jh

    j

    zeq

    = 617 [mm] Equivalent force arm [6.3.3.1.(3)]

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    38/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 37

    keq

    = jk

    eff,jh

    j/ z

    eq

    keq

    = 24 [mm] Equivalent stiffness coefficient of a bolt arrangement [6.3.3.1.(1)]

    Sj, in i

    = E zeq

    2k

    eq

    [6.3.1.(4)]

    Sj, in i

    =1863082.84 [kN*m] Initial rotational stiffness [6.3.1.(4)]

    = 1.00 Stiffness coefficient of a connection [6.3.1.(6)]Sj= S

    j,i ni/ [6.3.1.(4)]

    Sj= 1863082.84 [kN*m] Final rotational stiffness [6.3.1.(4)]

    Connection classification due to stiffness.

    Sj, rig

    = 8486.99 [kN*m] Stiffness of a rigid connection [5.2.2.5]

    Sj,pi n

    = 530.44 [kN*m] Stiffness of a pinned connection [5.2.2.5]

    Sj, in i

    Sj,ri g

    RIGID

    WEAKESTCOMPONENT:

    FRONT PLATE - TENSION

    REMARKS

    Bolts vertical spacing is too large.180 [mm] > 140 [mm]

    Connection conforms to the code Ratio0.32

    Connection (2)

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    39/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 38

    Connection (2.1)

    900

    250

    125

    450

    20

    I-350x75x7x10

    65

    33

    300

    65

    D 16 A3073

    400

    200

    10

    Y

    Z70

    200

    20

    20

    20

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    40/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 39

    Connection (2.2)

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017

    Fixed column base designEurocode 3: EN 1993-1-8:2005/AC:2009 + CEB Design Guide:

    Design of fastenings in concreteRatio

    0.32

    GENERAL

    Connection no.: 2

    Connection nam e:Fixed column base

    Structure node: 92

    Structure bars : 141

    GEOMETRY

    COLUMN

    Section:I-350x75x7x10

    Bar no.: 141

    Lc= 12.13 [m] Colum n length

    = 14.3 [Deg] Inclination angleh

    c= 350 [mm] Height of column section

    bfc

    = 75 [mm] Width of column section

    twc

    = 7 [mm] Thickness of the web of column section

    tfc

    = 10 [mm] Thickness of the flange of column section

    rc= 0 [mm] Radius of column section fil let

    Ac= 38.10 [cm2] Cross -sectional area of a column

    Iyc

    = 6432.58 [cm4] Moment of inertia of the column section

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    41/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 40

    Material:STEEL 235MPa

    fyc

    = 235.00 [MPa] Res is tance

    fuc

    = 360.00 [MPa] Yield strength of a material

    COLUMNBASElpd

    = 400 [mm] Length

    bpd

    = 200 [mm] Width

    tpd

    = 10 [m m] Thickness

    Material:STEEL 235MPa

    fypd

    = 235.00 [MPa] Res is tance

    fupd

    = 360.00 [MPa] Yield strength of a material

    ANCHORAGE

    The shear plane pass es through the UNTHREADED portion of the bolt.

    Class = A307 Anchor class

    fyb

    = 248.21 [MPa] Yield strength of the anchor material

    fub

    = 413.69 [MPa] Tensile strength of the anchor material

    d = 16 [mm] Bolt diameter

    As= 1.98 [cm

    2] Effective section area of a bolt

    Av= 1.98 [cm

    2] Area of bolt section

    nH

    = 3 Number of bolt columns

    nV

    = 2 Number of bolt rows

    Horizontal spacing eHi=100 [mm]

    Vertical spacing eVi

    = 70 [mm]

    Anchor dimensions

    L1= 65 [mm]

    L2= 300 [mm]

    L3= 65 [mm]

    L4= 65 [mm]

    Washer

    lwd

    = 20 [mm] Length

    bwd

    = 20 [mm] Width

    twd

    = 3 [m m] Thickness

    MATERIALFACTORS

    M0

    = 1.00 Partial safety factor

    M2

    = 1.25 Partial safety factor

    C

    = 1.50 Partial safety factor

    SPREADFOOTING

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    42/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 41

    L = 450 [mm] Spread footing length

    B = 250 [mm] Spread footing width

    H = 900 [mm] Spread footing height

    Concrete

    Class C25

    fck

    = 25.00 [MPa] Characteristic resistance for compression

    Grout layer

    tg= 20 [mm] Thickness of leveling layer (grout)

    fck,g

    = 12.00 [MPa] Characteristic resis tance for compression

    Cf,d

    = 0.30 Coeff. of friction between the base plate and concrete

    WELDS

    ap=

    3 [mm] Footing plate of the column base

    LOADS

    Case:5: ULS_RAFTER (1+2)*1.20+3*1.00

    Nj,Ed

    = -85.19 [kN] Axial force

    Vj,Ed,y

    = -0.25 [kN] Shear force

    Vj,Ed,z

    = 22.38 [kN] Shear force

    RESULTS

    COMPRESSIONZONE

    COMPRESSION OF CONCRETE

    fcd

    = 16.67 [MPa] Design compressive resistance EN 1992-1:[3.1.6.(1)]

    fj= 13.18 [MPa] Design bearing resistance under the base plate [6.2.5.(7)]

    c = tp(f

    yp/(3*f

    j*

    M0))

    c = 24 [mm] Additional width of the bearing pressure zone [6.2.5.(4)]

    beff

    = 59 [mm ] Effective width of the bearing pres sure zone under the flange [6.2.5.(3)]

    leff

    = 124 [mm ] Effective length of the bearing pres sure zone under the flange [6.2.5.(3)]

    Ac0

    = 72.73 [cm2] Area of the joint between the base plate and the foundation EN 1992-1:[6.7.(3)]

    Ac1

    =275.00 [cm2] Maximum design area of load distribution EN 1992-1:[6.7.(3)]

    Frdu

    = Ac0

    *fcd

    *(Ac1

    /Ac0

    ) 3*Ac0

    *fcd

    Frdu

    = 235.71 [kN] Bearing resistance of concrete EN 1992-1:[6.7.(3)]

    j= 0.67 Reduction factor for compression [6.2.5.(7)]

    fjd

    = j*F

    rdu/(b

    eff*l

    eff)

    fjd

    = 21.61 [MPa] Design bearing resistance [6.2.5.(7)]

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    43/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 42

    Ac,n

    = 302.29 [cm2] Bearing area for compression [6.2.8.2.(1)]

    Fc,Rd,i

    = AC,i

    *fjd

    Fc,Rd,n

    =653.12 [kN] Bearing resistance of concrete for compression [6.2.8.2.(1)]

    RESISTANCES OF SPREAD FOOTING IN THE COMPRESSION ZONE

    Nj,Rd

    = Fc,Rd,n

    Nj,Rd

    =653.12 [kN] Resistance of a spread footing for axial compression [6.2.8.2.(1)]

    CONNECTIONCAPACITYCHECK

    Nj,Ed

    / Nj,Rd

    1,0 (6.24) 0.13 < 1.00 verified (0.13)

    SHEAR

    BEARING PRESSURE OF AN ANCHOR BOLT ONTO THE BASE PLATE

    Shear force Vj ,Ed,y

    d,y

    =1.21 Coeff. taking account of the bolt position - in the direction of shear [Table 3.4]

    b,y

    =1.00 Coeff. for resis tance calculation F1,vb,Rd [Table 3.4]

    k1,y

    = 2.50 Coeff. taking account of the bolt position - perpendicularly to the direction of shear [Table 3.4]

    F1,vb,Rd,y

    = k1,y

    *b,y

    *fup

    *d*tp/

    M2

    F1,vb,Rd,y

    =114.30 [kN] Resistance of an anchor bolt for bearing pressure onto the base plate [6.2.2.(7)]

    Shear force Vj ,Ed,z

    d,z

    =1.86 Coeff. taking account of the bolt position - in the direction of shear [Table 3.4]

    b,z

    =1.00 Coeff. for resis tance calculation F1,vb,Rd [Table 3.4]

    k1,z

    = 2.50 Coeff. taking account of the bolt position - perpendicularly to the direction of shear [Table 3.4]

    F1,vb,Rd,z

    = k1,z

    *b,z

    *fup

    *d*tp/

    M2

    F1,vb,Rd,z

    =114.30 [kN] Resistance of an anchor bolt for bearing pressure onto the base plate [6.2.2.(7)]

    SHEAR OF AN ANCHOR BOLT

    b= 0.37 Coeff. for resis tance calculation F2,vb,Rd [6.2.2.(7)]

    Avb= 1.98 [cm2

    ] Area of bolt section [6.2.2.(7)]fub

    = 413.69 [MPa] Tensile strength of the anchor material [6.2.2.(7)]

    M2

    = 1.25 Partial safety factor [6.2.2.(7)]

    F2,vb,Rd

    = b*f

    ub*A

    vb/

    M2

    F2,vb,Rd

    = 23.94 [kN] Shear resistance of a bolt - without lever arm [6.2.2.(7)]

    M

    = 2.00 Factor related to the fas tening of an anchor in the foundation CEB [9.3.2.2]

    MRk,s

    = 0.15 [kN*m] Characteristic bending resistance of an anchor CEB [9.3.2.2]

    lsm

    = 33 [mm] Lever arm length CEB [9.3.2.2]

    Ms= 1.20 Partial safety factor CEB [3.2.3.2]F

    v,Rd,sm=

    M*M

    Rk,s/(l

    sm*

    Ms)

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    44/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Report on Calculation Note Date : 17/06/16 Page : 43

    Fv,Rd,sm

    = 7.40 [kN] Shear resistance of a bolt - with lever arm CEB [9.3.1]

    CONCRETE PRY-OUT FAILURE

    NRk,c

    = 20.41 [kN] Design uplift capacity CEB [9.2.4]

    k3= 2.00 Factor related to the anchor length CEB [9.3.3]

    Mc

    = 2.16 Partial safety factor CEB [3.2.3.1]

    Fv,Rd,cp

    = k3*N

    Rk,c/

    Mc

    Fv,Rd,cp

    = 18.90 [kN] Concrete resistance for pry-out failure CEB [9.3.1]

    CONCRETE EDGE FAILURE

    Shear force Vj ,Ed,y

    VRk,c,y

    0=55.52 [kN] Characteristic resistance of an anchor

    A,V,y

    = 0.93 Factor related to anchor spacing and edge distance

    h,V,y

    = 1.00 Factor related to the foundation thickness

    s,V,y= 0.98 Factor related to the influence of edges parallel to the shear load direction

    ec,V,y

    = 1.00 Factor taking account a group effect when different shear loads are acting on the individual anch

    ,V,y= 1.00 Factor related to the angle at which the shear load is applied

    ucr,V,y

    = 1.00 Factor related to the type of edge reinforcement used

    Mc

    = 2.16 Partial safety factor

    Fv,Rd,c,y

    = VRk,c,y

    0*

    A,V,y*

    h,V,y*

    s,V,y*

    ec,V,y*,V,y*ucr,V,y/Mc

    Fv,Rd,c,y

    = 23.27 [kN] Concrete resistance for edge failure CEB [9.3.1]

    Shear force Vj ,Ed,z

    VRk,c,z

    0=90.88 [kN] Characteristic resistance of an anchor

    A,V,z

    = 0.48 Factor related to anchor spacing and edge distance

    h,V,z

    = 1.00 Factor related to the foundation thickness

    s,V,z

    = 0.84 Factor related to the influence of edges parallel to the shear load direction

    ec,V,z

    = 1.00 Factor taking account a group effect when different shear loads are acting on the individual anch

    ,V,z= 1.00 Factor related to the angle at which the shear load is applied

    ucr,V,z

    = 1.00 Factor related to the type of edge reinforcement used

    Mc

    = 2.16 Partial safety factor

    Fv,Rd,c,z= VRk,c,z0

    *A,V,z*h,V,z*s,V,z*ec,V,z*,V,z*ucr,V,z/McF

    v,Rd,c,z= 17.05 [kN] Concrete resistance for edge failure CEB [9.3.1]

    SPLITTING RESISTANCE

    Cf,d

    = 0.30 Coeff. of friction between the base plate and concrete [6.2.2.(6)]

    Nc,Ed

    =85.19 [kN] Compressive force [6.2.2.(6)]

    Ff,Rd

    = Cf,d

    *Nc,Ed

    Ff,Rd

    = 25.56 [kN] Slip resistance [6.2.2.(6)]

    SHEAR CHECK

    Vj,Rd,y

    = nb*min(F

    1,vb,Rd,y, F

    2,vb,Rd, F

    v,Rd,sm, F

    v,Rd,cp, F

    v,Rd,c,y) + F

    f,Rd

  • 7/25/2019 Report on Structural Elements Design

    45/45

    Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2017Author: ETC Engineering Consultant Co., Ltd. File: 3D Structure Medeling.rtdDesigner: ASEAN ENG. SOK RASMEY, Msc. Str. Eng, PE Project: Guag Hua G.H Garment Co., Ltd.

    Vj,Rd,y

    = 69.95 [kN] Connection resistance for shear CEB [9.3.1]

    Vj,Ed,y

    / Vj ,Rd,y

    1,0 0.00 < 1.00 verified (0.00)

    Vj,Rd,z

    = nb*min(F

    1,vb,Rd,z, F

    2,vb,Rd, F

    v,Rd,sm, F

    v,Rd,cp, F

    v,Rd,c,z) + F

    f,Rd

    Vj,Rd,z

    = 69.95 [kN] Connection resistance for shear CEB [9.3.1]

    Vj,Ed,z

    / Vj ,Rd,z

    1,0 0.32 < 1.00 verified (0.32)

    Vj,Ed,y

    / Vj ,Rd,y

    + Vj,Ed,z

    / Vj,Rd,z

    1,0 0.32 < 1.00 verified (0.32)

    WELDSBETWEENTHECOLUMNANDTHEBASEPLATE

    = 15.92 [MPa] Normal stress in a weld [4.5.3.(7)]

    = 15.92 [MPa] Perpendicular tangent stress [4.5.3.(7)]

    yII

    = -0.29 [MPa] Tangent stress parallel to Vj,Ed,y [4.5.3.(7)]

    zII= 11.30 [MPa] Tangent stress parallel to Vj,Ed,z [4.5.3.(7)]

    W

    = 0.80 Resistance-dependent coefficient [4.5.3.(7)]

    / (0.9*fu/M2)) 1.0 (4.1) 0.06 < 1.00 verified (0.06)

    (2+ 3.0 (

    yII2+

    2)) / (f

    u/(

    W*

    M2))) 1.0 (4.1) 0.09 < 1.00 verified (0.09)

    (2+ 3.0 (

    zII2+

    2)) / (f

    u/(

    W*

    M2))) 1.0 (4.1) 0.10 < 1.00 verified (0.10)

    WEAKESTCOMPONENT:

    FOUNDATION - BEARING PRESSURE ONTO CONCRETE

    REMARKS

    Anchor curvature radius is too sm all. 33 [mm] < 48 [mm]

    Segment L4 of the hook anchor is too short.65 [mm] < 79 [mm]

    Connection conforms to the code Ratio0.32