oldweb.sawpa.orgoldweb.sawpa.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/2015-8... · regular commission meeting...

S A W P A

REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, AUGUST 4, 2015 – 9:30 A.M.

AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Thomas P. Evans, Chair) 2. ROLL CALL 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS

Members of the public may address the Commission on items within the jurisdiction of the Commission; however, no action may be taken on an item not appearing on the agenda unless the action is otherwise authorized by Government Code §54954.2(b).

4. CONSENT CALENDAR

All matters listed on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and non-controversial and will be acted upon by the Commission by one motion as listed below.

A. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES: JULY 21, 2015 ............................................................ 5 Recommendation: Approve as posted.

5. SPECIAL COMMENDATIONS

A. PRESENTATION OF APPRECIATION PLAQUE ON BEHALF OF LESJWA BOARD • Thomas P. Evans

6. NEW BUSINESS

A. INLAND EMPIRE BRINE LINE REACH V REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT – PHASE 1 (CM#2015.62) ............................................................................................ 11 Presenter: David Ruhl Recommendation: Authorize the General Manager to execute Change Order No. 1 with Charles King Company in an amount not to exceed $5,381.74 for the Inland Empire Brine Line Reach V Rehabilitation and Improvement Project – Phase 1.

SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY 11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, California 92503 • (951) 354-4220

1

SAWPA Commission

Regular Meeting Agenda

August 4, 2015

B. PRESENTATION OF THE 2015 COMPENSATION REPORT, DATED

JULY 30, 2015 ...................................................................................................................... 19 Presenter: Doug Johnson, Vice President, Ralph Andersen & Associates

Recommendation: Receive and file.

C. ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF 2015 COMPENSATION REPORT

AND MIGRATION OF CalPERS EMPLOYER PAID MEMBER

CONTRIBUTIONS (EPMC) TO STAFF (CM#2015.64) ................................................ 15 Presenter: Celeste Cantú

Recommendation:

(1) Adopt and implement the 2015 Compensation Report, dated July 30, 2015; and,

(2) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-08 migrating the CalPERS Employer Paid Member Contributions (EPMC)

in two stages.

7. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS Recommendation: Receive and file the following oral/written reports/updates.

A. CASH TRANSACTIONS REPORT – JUNE 2015 .......................................................................... 75 Presenter: Karen Williams

B. INTER-FUND BORROWING – JUNE 2015 (CM#2015.61) .......................................................... 83 Presenter: Karen Williams

C. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS/FINANCIAL REPORTING – JUNE 2015

(CM#2015.63) ...................................................................................................................................... 87 Presenter: Karen Williams

D. FOURTH QUARTER FYE 2015 EXPENSE REPORTS ............................................................. 109

Staff

General Manager

Presenter: Karen Williams

E. CHAIR’S COMMENTS/REPORT

F. COMMISSIONERS’ COMMENTS

8. COMMISSION MEETING SCHEDULE – AUGUST 2015

Consider cancellation of the August 18, 2015 regular meeting.

9. CLOSED SESSION

A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS – PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE

SECTION 54957.6

Agency Designated Representative: Celeste Cantú

Unrepresented Employees: All SAWPA Employees

B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION – PURSUANT

TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(d)(2)

Number of Potential Cases: One

2

SAWPA Commission

Regular Meeting Agenda

August 4, 2015

10. ADJOURNMENT

PLEASE NOTE:

Americans with Disabilities Act: Meeting rooms are wheelchair accessible. If you require any special disability related accommodations

to participate in this meeting, please contact Kelly Berry at (951) 354-4230 or [email protected]. Notification at least 48 hours prior to

the meeting will enable staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility for this meeting. Requests should specify the nature

of the disability and the type of accommodation requested.

Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Commission after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public

inspection during normal business hours at the SAWPA office, 11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, and available at www.sawpa.org,

subject to staff’s ability to post documents prior to the meeting.

Declaration of Posting

I, Kelly Berry, Clerk of the Board of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority declare that on Thursday, July 30, 2015, a copy of this

agenda has been uploaded to the SAWPA website at www.sawpa.org and posted in SAWPA’s office at 11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside,

California.

/s/

2015 - SAWPA Commission Meetings/Events

First and Third Tuesday of the Month (NOTE: Unless otherwise noted, all Commission Workshops/Meetings begin at 9:30 a.m., and are held at SAWPA.)

January

1/6/15 Commission Workshop

1/20/15 Regular Commission Meeting

February



March



April



May

5/5/15 Commission Workshop [CANCELLED]


June

6/2/15 Commission Workshop [Special]


July



August



September



October



November



December


12/1 – 12/4/15 ACWA Fall Conference, Indian Wells


_______________________________________ Kelly Berry, CMC

3

http://www.sawpa.org/

http://www.sawpa.org/

Page Intentionally Blank

4

SAWPA COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES

JULY 21, 2015 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT Thomas P. Evans, Chair, Western Municipal Water District Ed Killgore, Vice Chair, San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District David J. Slawson, Alternate, Eastern Municipal Water District Phil Anthony, Orange County Water District Terry Catlin, Inland Empire Utilities Agency COMMISSIONERS ABSENT Ronald W. Sullivan, Secretary-Treasurer, Eastern Municipal Water District ALTERNATE COMMISSIONERS PRESENT; NON-VOTING

Jasmin Hall, Alternate, Inland Empire Utilities Agency Steve Copelan, Alternate, San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District

STAFF PRESENT Celeste Cantú, Rich Haller, Larry McKenney, Karen Williams,

Kelly Berry, Jerry Oldenburg, David Ruhl, Carlos Quintero The Regular Commission Meeting of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority was called to order at 9:30 a.m. by Chair Thomas P. Evans at the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, 11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Commissioner Killgore led the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. ROLL CALL

Roll call was duly noted and recorded by the Clerk of the Board. 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS

Chair Evans called for public comments. There were no public comments. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR

A. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES: JULY 7, 2015

A handout was provided noting a revision to the July 7 meeting minutes, on Agenda Item No. 5.A. The first sentence after the second table within the item was revised as follows: “Watershed-Wide benefits, which the agencies proposed to achieve must prove up as projects are built and for a period of 10 years thereafter, include:”

Larry McKenney explained the description received of the benefits expected to be achieved is based on what was proposed by the project proponent, not what we are contractually obligated to achieve at this point. Staff is working on a contract with the State.

5

SAWPA Commission Regular Meeting Minutes

July 21, 2015 Page 2

B. TREASURER’S REPORT – JUNE 2015

MOVED, approve the Consent Calendar.

Result: Adopted (Unanimously; 5-0) Motion/Second: Anthony/Catlin Ayes Anthony, Catlin, Evans, Killgore, Slawson Nays: None Abstentions: None Absent: None

5. NEW BUSINESS

A. CALIFORNIA NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY GRANT APPLICATION FOR A SANTA ANA SUCKER HABITAT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CM#2015.56) Ian Achimore provided a PowerPoint presentation on the California Rivers and Parkways Grant program. This grant would fill the funding gap for the Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Improvement Project (Project) discussed at the July 7, 2015 Commission meeting. The Rivers and Parkways Grant is offered by the California Natural Resources Agency; $7.5 million is available statewide with a $500,000 cap per applicant and no cost share requirement. The application is due September 1, 2015, with award notifications expected in Spring 2016. Proposed projects must have a dual purpose, such as habitat and education. If the grant request is approved, SAWPA would partner with two organizations in the Santa Ana River Watershed: Riverside Land Conservancy (signage along the Santa Ana River Trail), and Inland Empire Waterkeeper (proposed kiosk in Martha Mclean/Anza Narrows Park). Signage would include information on the Santa Ana Sucker and the importance of protecting its habitat.

Commissioner Anthony asked if SAWPA would seek the entire $500,000 cap. The following preliminary project budget was presented, which was also contained on page 18 of the agenda packet:

6



SAWPA’s grant application will be for the amount of $294,000, which is expected to complete the funding needed for the Project.

MOVED, adopt Resolution No. 2015-07 authorizing staff to apply for a California River Parkways Grant and, if successful, enter into a grant agreement with the State to receive funding for a habitat improvement project to benefit the Santa Ana Sucker (the Santa Ana River Trail, Education and Fish Habitat Nexus Project).

Result: Adopted (Unanimously; 5-0) Motion/Second: Catlin/Anthony Ayes Anthony, Catlin, Evans, Killgore, Slawson Nays: None Abstentions: None Absent: None

B. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACK RELOCATION AND PROTECTION OF

BRINE LINE REACH 4E (CM#2015.57) As a follow up to his presentation made to the Commission in October 2014, Carlos Quintero provided a PowerPoint presentation on the relocation of a Union Pacific railroad track over Reach 4E of the Inland Empire Brine Line. Protection measures include construction of a 4’ thick concrete slab with 55’- 63’ deep support pilings. The project was designed by a Union Pacific consultant with the following project costs:

Task Cost Engineering 159,000 Construction 651,800 TOTAL 810,800

Cost Sharing Allocation:

SAWPA (39%) 316,212 San Bernardino Municipal Water Dept (61%) 494,588

SAWPA is responsible for 39% of the cost ($316,212); the San Bernardino Municipal Water Department is responsible for 61% of the costs ($494,588), which was determined based on pipeline diameter. The schedule was originally estimated to be 12 months; however, the contractor’s actual schedule will be provided as soon as it is available.

MOVED, receive and file staff’s report and presentation on the Union Pacific Railroad track relocation and protection of Brine Line Reach 4E.

Result: Adopted (Unanimously; 5-0) Motion/Second: Anthony/Catlin Ayes Anthony, Catlin, Evans, Killgore, Slawson Nays: None Abstentions: None Absent: None

7



C. INLAND EMPIRE BRINE LINE REACH V REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT – PHASE 1 (CM#2015.59) David Ruhl provided a PowerPoint presentation on Phase 1 of the Inland Empire Brine Line Reach V Rehabilitation and Improvement Project. This project is a result of the October 2011 brine spill in the Dos Lagos area of the City of Corona. The project scope includes installation of 23,000 feet of cured-in-place-pipe (CIPP) of the Reach V brine line through portions of Riverside County and the City of Corona.

Schedule and Phasing

Phase 1 February – September 2015

Phase 2 September 2015 – January 2016

Phase 3 September 2015 – January 2016

Phase 4 October 2015 – February 2016

This item was for informational purposes only; no action was taken on Agenda Item No. 5.C.

D. INLAND EMPIRE BRINE LINE REACH V REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT – PHASE 2 (NICHOLS ROAD RELOCATION) (CM#2015.58) David Ruhl provided a PowerPoint presentation on Phase 2 of the Inland Empire Brine Line Reach V Rehabilitation and Improvement Project (Nichols Road Relocation). The project involves installation of 4,900 feet of 32’ HDPE (high-density polyethylene) pipe to replace the 30’ PVC pipe running within an easement into Nichols Road with Castle and Cooke. Once the design has been completed it will be submitted to the City of Lake Elsinore and Castle and Cooke for review. Within the September/October timeframe, staff will request Commission approval to advertise for bids.

This item was for informational purposes only; no action was taken on Agenda Item No. 5.D.

E. INLAND EMPIRE BRINE LINE FY 2015 SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES, ACCOMPLISHMENTS, FY 2016 GOALS (CM#2015.60) Rich Haller provided a PowerPoint presentation on the Inland Empire Brine Line activities and accomplishments of FY 2015, as well as FY 2016 goals.

FY 2015 Accomplishments. The marketing video was completed and the brochure updated. Projects include the pipeline relocation in Orange County (new metering station-OCPW), protection and relocation of the Yorba Slaughter Dike, Reach V repairs, and the Nichols Road relocation. Annual flow was approximately 4,010 million gallons, resulting in the removal of approximately 91,350 tons of salt. 55,000 lineal feet of pipeline was inspected by CCTV (closed circuit television); 36,000 lineal feet of pipeline was cleaned resulting in the removal of 180 tons of debris.

FY 2016 Goals. FY 2016 goals include a complete rehabilitation of all a/v valves and complete modification of enclosures to allow easy access and containment of small spills; continued implementation of revamped pretreatment program, including updating Ordinance and Local Limits after completion of corresponding documents by OCSD; update flow projections and the Brine Line

8



Business Plan; implementation of the Brine Line marketing strategy; completion of repairs to Reach V; and, completion of pipeline relocation into Nichols Road, including design, bid, award, and start of construction.

Finally, Rich Haller reviewed FY 2015 energy saving measures in the SAWPA Office building, resulting in a 15% reduction of energy consumption and 23% reduction of water consumption.

The efforts of Rich Haller and his staff were applauded by members of the Commission.

This item was for informational purposes only; no action was taken on Agenda Item No. 5.E. 6. OLD BUSINESS

None. 7. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS

Recommendation: Receive and file the following oral/written reports/updates.

A. CASH TRANSACTIONS REPORT – MAY 2015 Presenter: Karen Williams

B. INTER-FUND BORROWING – MAY 2015 (CM#2015.54) Presenter: Karen Williams

C. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS/FINANCIAL REPORTING – MAY 2015 (CM#2015.55) Presenter: Karen Williams

D. STATE LEGISLATIVE REPORT Presenter: Celeste Cantú

E. GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT Celeste Cantú noted plans for a September 3, 2015 joint meeting with the Orange County Sanitation District governing Board, which will include tours of the Mt. View Power Plant in Redlands and the Henry N. Wochholz Regional Water Reclamation Facility (WRWRF) in Yucaipa. A compensation study update handout was provided; the Employee Compensation Ad Hoc Committee is expected to have a recommendation in time for the next Commission meeting.

F. SAWPA GENERAL MANAGERS MEETING NOTES • July 14, 2015

G. CHAIR’S COMMENTS/REPORT

H. COMMISSIONERS’ COMMENTS 8. COMMISSION MEETING SCHEDULE – AUGUST 2015

Cancellation of the August 18, 2015 regular meeting was considered; this will be revisited at the August 4, 2015 regular meeting.

9. CLOSED SESSION

There was no closed session.

9



10. ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business for review, Chair Evans adjourned the meeting at 10:09 a.m. Approved at a Regular Meeting of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Commission on Tuesday, August 2, 2015. _____________________________________ Thomas P. Evans, Chair Attest: _____________________________________ Kelly Berry, CMC Clerk of the Board

10

COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 2015.62 DATE: August 4, 2015 TO: SAWPA Commission SUBJECT: Inland Empire Brine Line Reach V Rehabilitation and Improvement Project –

Phase1 PREPARED BY: David Ruhl, Program Manager RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission authorize the General Manager to execute Change Order No. 1 with Charles King Company in an amount not to exceed $5,381.74 for the Inland Empire Brine Line Reach V Rehabilitation and Improvement Project – Phase 1. DISCUSSION Change Order No. 1 includes additional pothole activities by the Contractor, Charles King Company (CKC), to locate the Brine Line that was not shown correctly on the as-built drawings. In addition, there are several no cost changes that document changes to the construction documents. At Maintenance Access Structure (MAS) 560-B, the Contractor was not able to locate the brine line as shown on the as-built drawings. Additional potholing efforts were necessary to locate the brine line which was found 8 feet away from the location shown on the as-built drawings. In addition, the Brine Line was located under an unforeseen 6-inch thick concrete slab that may have been part of the old Temescal Canyon Road prior to the road profile being raised 8 feet. The additional cost for this work is $4,267.65. At MAS 580-B, the contractor encountered an unknown massive concrete block over the brine line while attempting to locate the brine line and a blow-off structure shown on the as-built drawings. Additional potholing efforts were necessary to identify the limits of the concrete, location of the brine line and blow-off structure. The brine line was found to extend to the west side of Temescal Canyon Road instead of the east side of the road as shown on the as-built drawing. As a result of the extended excavation to locate the blow-off structure, it was determined the structure was never installed in the original construction. The additional cost for this work is $1,114.09. The total cost for additional potholing activities included in Change Order No. 1 is $5,381.74. A copy of Change Order No. 1 is attached for your review. Work activities Phase 1 Cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) liner installation is scheduled to commence the week of July 24th. Phase 1 liner installation will continue at a rate of 1,500 feet per week, (two 750 foot segments per week) for the subsequent 8 weeks. The contractor’s schedule indicates they are starting to fall behind schedule. The contractor has indicated they will consider lining three segments per week and implementing Phase 2 and 3 in parallel in order to shorten the timeline for the remaining work.

11

CM# 2015.62 August 4, 2015 Page 2 BACKGROUND The Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) awarded a construction contract to Charles King Construction Company to complete the Inland Empire Brine Line Rehabilitation and Improvement Project – Phase 1. The work includes the lining of approximately four miles of the Inland Empire Brine Line in the Temescal Valley, Riverside County and the City of Corona. The repair will strengthen the brine line reducing the risk of failure. The rehabilitation of the brine line includes the installation of 19 maintenance access structures, 8 isolation valves, modifications and replacement of 20 air vacuum release valves and 18 blow-off assemblies and the lining of the brine line utilizing the cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) method. The project begins at Temescal Canyon Road at Glen Ivy Road and continues northbound on Temescal Canyon Road to Tom Barnes Road (North of Cajalco Road). RESOURCE IMPACTS Funds to cover the construction and construction management costs are budgeted under the FY 2015-16 Budget, Fund No. 326. A portion of the construction costs are funded through an SRF Loan Program. Attachment

1. Change Order No. 1

CM 2015.62 Reach V Change Ord Charles King

12

SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY CHANGE ORDER NO. 1

To Construction Contract CONTRACTOR: Charles King Company, Inc. VENDOR NO. 2053 2841 Gardena Ave. Signal Hill, CA 90755 PROJECT: Inland Empire Brine Line Reach V Rehabilitation & Improvement Project – Phase 1 COST: $5,381.74 REQUESTED BY: David Ruhl, Program Manager August 4, 2015 FINANCE: ________________________________________ Karen Williams, CFO Date FINANCING SOURCE: Acct. Coding: 326-REACH-6310-01

Acct. Description: Construction COMMISSION AUTHORIZATION REQUIRED FOR THIS CHANGE ORDER: YES (X) NO ( )

Commission Memo 2015.62

Original Contract was authorized on October 21, 2014; Commission Memo 8937

Contractor is hereby directed to provide the extra work necessary to comply with this change order. DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION OF CHANGE: 1.01 MAS 560-B (Sta. 589+95) Additional Pothole Activities: Additional pothole activities were completed by CKC to locate the existing brine line as it was not initially located as shown on the contract documents. The total cost for the additional work is $4,267.65. As an outcome of the pothole activities, maintenance access structure (MAS) V-0560-B will be constructed in the location shown on detail 2, sheet C-12 of the Contract Documents. The eliminated appurtenances from MAS V-0530-B will be utilized to construct the necessary offset from the existing brine line alignment to the identified location within the existing median. No additional costs or credits will be necessary as materials are already on hand and accounted for as part of the original contract. 1.02 MAS V-0580-B (Sta. 622+35) Additional Pothole Activities: Additional pothole activities were completed by CKC to expose the limits of the encountered concrete mass in an effort to locate the existing brine line. The total cost for the additional work is $1,114.09. 1.03 MAS 530-B (Sta. 546+50) and MAS 560-B (Sta. 589+95): Due to conflict with an existing 12” waterline, identified through pothole activities, MAS V-0530-B was moved to remain in-line verses offset as originally shown on the Contract Documents. Due to conflicts encountered at MAS V-0560-B, Charles King Co. (CKC) was directed to utilize the fittings that were intended to be used at MAS V-0530-B to offset the MAS in lieu of remaining in-line. Due to these changes, no additional costs or credits will be necessary as materials are already on hand and accounted for as part of the original contract.

13

Change Order No. 1 to Construction Contract

Charles King Company, Inc. August 4, 2015

Page 2 1.04 Deletion of Cost Loaded Schedule Requirements: This no cost change is being issued to CKC, for verbiage change regarding the cost loaded schedule requirements for the project.

The requirement as originally identified in specification section 01311.1.01.A, stating that "The CPM Schedule shall be cost loaded." is no longer a requirement for this contract. CKC will provide a schedule of values to which progress payment applications will be based upon.

CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME: (No change) CHANGE IN TASK ORDER PRICE: Original Contract Amount: $12,561,316.00

Change Order No. 1 Amount: $5,381.74

Revised Contract Total: $12,566,697.74 ACCEPTANCE: Contractor accepts the terms and conditions stated above as full and final settlement of any and all claims arising from or related to this Change Order. Contractor agrees to perform the above described work in accordance with the above terms and in compliance with applicable sections of the Contract Specifications. This Change Order is hereby agreed to, accepted and approved, all in accordance with the General Provisions of the Contract Specifications. SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY Celeste Cantú, General Manager Date CHARLES KING COMPANY, INC. _________________________ (Signature) Date Typed/Printed Name

14

COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 2015.64 DATE: August 4, 2015 TO: SAWPA Commission FROM: Celeste Cantú, General Manager SUBJECT: Adoption and Implementation of 2015 Compensation Report and Migration of

CalPERS Employer Paid Member Contributions (EPMC) to Staff RECOMMENDATION That the Commission:

(1) Adopt and implement the 2015 Compensation Report, dated July 30, 2015; and, (2) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-08 migrating the CalPERS Employer Paid Member Contributions

(EPMC) in two states. DISCUSSION The SAWPA Commission directed staff to prepare a Request for Proposals to engage a firm to conduct a classification and compensation study, including examining the practice of employer paid member contribution to CalPERs. At the October 21, 2014 Commission Meeting, the Commission issued a contract to Ralph Andersen & Associates to conduct a classification and compensation study. The purpose of the study was to define the unique characteristics required of SAWPA employees and quantify its value to the Agency. By conducting market comparisons using the agencies selected by Ralph Andersen & Associates, the study would be used to ensure that wages and benefits (total compensation) earned by SAWPA employees are equitable and competitive with the selected Labor Market Survey Agencies. The study also looked at SAWPA’s long standing practice of paying the 7% employee contribution for PERS retirement for non PEPRA employees (employees hired after Jan 1, 2013 without prior membership in PERS) and whether this practice should continue or migrate toward employees paying all or a portion of the Employer Paid Member Contribution (EPMC). On April 21, 2015, Doug Johnson, Vice President of Ralph Andersen & Associates presented draft results of the Classification and Compensation Study. The Commission directed the Ad Hoc Committee to review the study results and make recommendation back to the Commission. The Ad Hoc Committee met May 11th, June 3rd and 15th, reviewed the draft study results in detail and gave a verbal report to the SAWPA Commission on July 7, 2015 at which time the SAWPA Commission directed the following:

1. Set a market position at the 50th Percentile 2. Develop a method for bringing employees into the percentile 3. Present employee classification steps and ranges 4. Develop a transition plan for employees to pay the employee’s portion of CalPERS

The Ad Hoc Committee met again on July 20, 2015 and concluded that Ralph Andersen & Associates’ use of the surveyed agencies’ “majority” retirement formula, as opposed to the “classic” or PEPRA formulas was a fair and equitable indicator of total compensation as it represented the majority of employees. Additionally, the Ralph Andersen & Associates working excel spreadsheets were provided to the member agencies. Three sets of comments were received from member agencies and were sent to Ralph Andersen for review in updating the study to reflect the July 2015 compensation changes in their agencies. These updates have been considered and incorporated.

15

CM#2015.64 August 4, 2015 Page 2 Ralph Andersen & Associates modified the way in which the OCWD pension is shown. In a few cases comparable classes were removed where the positions were no longer the best match. They also reviewed Sanitation District’s data for the pretreatment and brine line operator positions to garner additional data. All of these resulted in fine tuning the recommended Salary Range Table. This iterative process has resulted in the Ad Hoc Committee returning one recommendation to implement the 2015 Compensation Report and to migrate the CalPERs EPMC in two stages with the following considerations and one still deliberating. The recommendation is that employees be placed within the Ralph Andersen & Associates recommended Salary Range Table using the following considerations:

1. Limits imposed by the FYE 2016 Budget 2. Tenure and level of accomplishment of the position 3. “Y” rate one position currently 21 over the Max Step.

Further, it is the recommendation that the SAWPA Commission revise its long standing practice of paying for the EPMC and effective July 1, 2015 transition half of the 7% cost or 3.5% of salaries to the employees with an equal adjustment to the Salary Range Table and on July 1, 2016 transition the second half of burden with an equal adjustment to the Salary Range Table consistent with the 2015 Compensation Report recommendation. RESOURCE IMPACTS The FYE 2016 and FYE 2017 Budgets as adopted are sufficient to absorb the fiscal impact of the Study with no impact to the member contributions. The 2015 Compensation Report will be fully implemented within that time frame at a cost of $241,372. The cost of migrating the CalPERs EPMC to the employees is $21,361 per year to SAWPA in payroll taxes. Attachment:

1. Resolution No. 2015-08 2. 2015 Compensation Report, dated July 30, 2015

Adopt Final Comp Rpt_Migrate EPMC to Staff

16

RESOLUTION NO. 2015-08

A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMISSIONERS OF THE SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY

FOR EMPLOYER PAID MEMBER CONTRIBUTIONS TO CALPERS

WHEREAS, the governing body of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority has the authority to implement Government Code Section 20691;

WHEREAS, the governing body of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority has a written labor policy or agreement, which specifically provides for the normal member contributions to be paid by the employer;

WHEREAS, one of the steps in the procedures to implement Government Code Section

20691 is the adoption by the governing body of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority of a Resolution regarding said Employer Paid Member Contributions (EPMC); and

WHEREAS, the governing body of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority has

identified the following conditions for the purpose of its election to pay EPMC: • This benefit shall apply to all employees of the local miscellaneous members.

• Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority will pay half of the 7% employee portion of the CalPERS pension effective July 1, 2015 as EPMC.

• Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority will pay 0% of the 7% employee portion of the CalPERS pension effective July 1, 2016 as EPMC.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the governing body of the Santa Ana

Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) hereby elects to pay EPMC, as set forth above.

ADOPTED this 4th day of August, 2015. SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY

By: ____________________________________ Thomas P. Evans, Chair Attest: _______________________________________ Kelly Berry, CMC Clerk of the Board

17


18

0

2015 Compensation Report Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority

Ralph Andersen & Associates 7/30/2015

19

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................................... 1

SECTION I PROJECT OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................... 2

EFFECTIVE COMPENSATION PLANS ..................................................................................................................................... 2

STUDY OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................................................... 2

SECTION II METHODOLOGIES ............................................................................................................................. 4

WHY COMPENSATION SURVEYS? ....................................................................................................................................... 4

LABOR MARKET SURVEY AGENCIES ..................................................................................................................................... 4

LABOR MARKET POSITION ............................................................................................................................................... 6

MARKET DATA COLLECTION PROCESS ................................................................................................................................ 6

STATISTICS USED IN ANALYZING THE MARKET DATA .............................................................................................................. 7

POINT OF COMPARISON .................................................................................................................................................. 8

SECTION III COMPENSATION FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................... 9

SALARY SURVEY RESULTS – BASE PAY ................................................................................................................................ 9

SALARY SURVEY RESULTS – BENEFITS ............................................................................................................................... 11

SUMMARY TABLE OF TOTAL COMPENSATION TRENDS ......................................................................................................... 12

CASH AND INSURANCE BENEFITS ..................................................................................................................................... 12

RETIREMENT BENEFITS ................................................................................................................................................... 13

SALARY RANGE RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 14

SALARY PLAN MAINTENANCE & ADMINISTRATION .............................................................................................................. 15

APPENDIX A SURVEY DATASHEETS .................................................................................................................. A-1

APPENDIX B SALARY RANGE RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................... A-2

20

R a l p h A n d e r s e n & A s s o c i a t e s

2

SECTION I

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Ralph Andersen & Associates was retained by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority to conduct a

Compensation Study involving all of the Authority’s job classifications. This report presents the results of the study

through the following sections:

Section I – Project Overview

Section II – Methodologies

Section III – Compensation Findings & Recommendations

The methodologies described in this report are similar to those used for any public or private employer, with a

customized approach to fit the location and nature of services of the Santa Ana Watershed Project.

EFFECTIVE COMPENSATION PLANS

The Authority’s compensation plan is one of the most important elements in its personnel system. Combining a

sound compensation system with an effective classification system contributes to the overall effectiveness of an

organization. In broad terms, the Authority’s compensation plan should:

Ensure that the Authority has the ability to attract and retain well-qualified employees

Provide a defensible and rational basis for compensating employees

Allow flexibility and adaptability for making Authority-wide compensation decisions based on changing

market conditions

Recognize the Authority’s responsibility as a public agency in establishing a pay plan that is consistent

with public practices

Ensure that the Authority’s compensation practices are competitive and consistent with those of

comparable employers.

Policy decisions resulting from the compensation study will ultimately balance the above goals with Authority’s

ability to pay and other budget priorities.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Based on the identified needs of the Authority, this study was designed to achieve the following overall objectives:

Update the Authority’s job descriptions

Conduct a compensation and benefits survey using representative market employers

Collect and analyze salary and benefits data to provide a picture of base salary and total compensation

trends

Document comparisons with the Authority compensation plan and identify any issues with the data,

comparable jobs, or market agencies

21


3

Conduct an internal relationship analysis and develop internal relationship guidelines

Develop salary and range recommendations based on the results of the market survey and internal

relationship analysis.

The primary objective of the compensation survey and subsequent analysis is to provide a “picture” of wage

practices in the labor market for comparable jobs. Additionally, the compensation survey documents how

Authority management classifications compare to similar employers in terms of compensation. The results of the

compensation survey provide a basis for compensating employees in a consistent, equitable, defensible, and

competitive manner. The methodologies used to accomplish these objectives are presented in Section II.

22


4

SECTION II

METHODOLOGIES

This section provides an overview of the methodologies that have been used to conduct the compensation

analyses and develop specific recommendations. Specific methods and systems presented include:

Why Market Surveys

Labor Market Survey Agencies

Labor Market Position

Market Data Collection Process

Point of Comparison.

All methodologies used by Ralph Andersen & Associates are consistent with established professional standards of

compensation.

WHY COMPENSATION SURVEYS?

Compensation surveys are an effective tool for compensation professionals to utilize in assessing an employer’s

competitiveness with market practices. Survey data is necessary because labor markets are constantly changing in

response to the availability of skill sets and fluctuations in economic conditions. These changes can vary among

regions and across industries and employer types. Thus, an effective survey will provide data that closely reflects

market conditions that the employer is competing against. Survey data is important for the following reasons:

Detailed data allows an employer to anticipate changing market conditions and understand what peer

employers are doing with respect to compensation and benefits.

Market data allows an employer to be deliberate in making compensation related decisions by reducing

guesses or reliance on indexes that may not reflect compensation practices.

Survey data can provide defensibility and transparency for employees and other stakeholders.

At a minimum, survey data can help an employer reduce undesired employee turnover and optimize the ability to

hire employees when filling vacant positions. The use of market data is a common practice in both public and

private employers, however, it is more critical for public employers who may need to meet the requirements of

labor bargaining and related laws.

LABOR MARKET SURVEY AGENCIES

One of the most important policy components of a compensation plan is a definition of the labor market within

which the Authority must compete. There are typically five important criteria utilized in identifying those

employers that comprise an agency’s labor market. They are:

Historical Practices — Over time, an employer will develop some level of continuity regarding labor

market comparables for the purposes of conducting compensation surveys. There may be a strong

history of surveying a specific set of employers either by agreement or by practice. In some instances,

survey agencies can be more formally defined by policy documents or memorandums of understanding.

Historical practices are an important consideration if for no other reason than deviating from a long term

historical practice typically requires a strong, defensible rationale.

23


5

Nature of Services Provided — In order to ensure comparable jobs are found when conducting a market

survey, it is important to utilize employers that provide similar services to the Authority. Recognizing that

the Authority provides services that are unique to regional water utilities, the selection of labor market

agencies cannot be based exclusively on geographic region alone. This factor recognizes that employers

who provide similar services are most likely to compete with one another for employees, have similar

jobs, and share organizational and economic characteristics. For this survey, we have included employers

that represented local public sector agencies, member water/wastewater agencies, and agencies with a

regional watershed presence.

Geographic Proximity — Geographic proximity of potential employers is a major factor utilized in

identifying an organization’s labor market. This factor is particularly important because it identifies those

employers that directly compete with the Authority to recruit and retain personnel. If a sufficient number

of comparable agencies exist within close proximity to the Authority, the defined geographic area may be

confined to a one, two or “surrounding” county region. For this survey, we have identified agencies within

the five Southern California counties.

Employer Size — The more similar employers are in size and complexity, the greater the likelihood that

comparable positions exist within both organizations. This factor is less important for jobs where

employer size makes little difference in the nature of duties and more important where employee or

other resources are a defining characteristic of the job. For this survey, finding organizations with a

similar complexity of issues and a similar budget size is difficult. To the degree size can impact the

comparability of specific jobs, our survey analysis will consider this when identifying job matches.

Economic Similarity — While there are a number of economic factors that can be compared among

agencies, the most important factor related to compensation is cost of living. In some regions or states,

living costs can vary significantly and have an important impact on how potential candidates evaluate

compensation. This factor can be important if labor market agencies are used beyond the local market, or

there are significant differences in the cost of living.

Using these factors, the following table identifies the recommended survey agencies for this survey.

Survey Agency Distance Operating

Budget ERI COL

ERI Wage

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 0 23,980,045 100.0 100.0

City of Ontario 22 N/A 93.9 100.1

City of Riverside 9 N/A 100.0 100.0

Cucamonga MWD 23 62,601,882 105.6 99.7

Eastern MWD (m) 22 259,272,000 97.2 99.6

Inland Empire Utilities Agency (m) 17 133,000,000 96.3 100.4

Irvine Ranch Water District 32 130,644,000 129.8 103.8

Orange County WD (m) 38 119,900,000 116.8 103.6

Riverside County 9 N/A 100.0 100.0

San Bernardino Valley MWD (m) 19 37,730,395 87.8 99.9

San Diego County Water Authority 92 402,237,000 137.8 102.8

Water Replenishment District of SoCal 49 57,099,000 96.6 104.0

Western MWD (m) 16 113,500,000 100.0 100.0

Median 29 146,220,475 105.2 101.2

24


6

Measurement criteria for several factors are included in the table including commuting distance, operating budget,

cost of living differences (COL), and relative wage differences. The cost of living and wage differential indexes are

provided by the Economic Research Institute (ERI) and are useful in understanding the economic differences

between different communities. The cost of living index (ERI COL) quantifies the percentage differences in goods,

services, transportation, healthcare, fuel, utilities, taxes, and housing costs each employer city location. The wage

differential index (ERI Wage) shows the relative wage differences for each city location and includes data from a

large number of employers at each city location. This index is used by corporations to adjust wages from one

market to another (e.g. a Chicago wage equivalent for a Seattle office).

These agencies represent utilities and public agencies that meet the market selection criteria with a balance in

parameters other than Operating Budget. In order to obtain data for comparable jobs, there is no option but to

include larger employers in the analysis. The use of larger employers will not have a skewing impact since job

comparabilities will be assessed with employer size impacts being identified where appropriate. Further analysis of

the data will ensure that skewing impacts of an unrepresentative sample of agencies do not occur. This is

explained later in this report.

One survey agency, the Water Replenishment District of Southern California, was not able to provide sufficient

documentation to be included in the survey.

LABOR MARKET POSITION

If the survey agencies represent a balanced set of employers, the Authority should consider a minimum market

position at the labor market median (defined as the “middle” of the labor market or 50th percentile). The median

statistic will not be significantly skewed with market anomalies or the inclusion of larger survey agencies. Most

employers will establish a market position somewhere between the 50th and 75th percentile.

Ultimately, when establishing the Authority’ desired labor market position, some key elements for consideration

will include:

The Authority’ ability to pay

Historical practices

Priority of compensation versus other expenditures

Recruitment and retention needs

Differences in benefits, including retirement formulas.

A solid, defensible labor market position will rely on a balancing of these factors in order to meet the Authority’

compensation goals and objectives. Options for market position are provided in the recommendations presented

later in this report.

MARKET DATA COLLECTION PROCESS

To ensure reliability and completeness, survey data was collected according to a structured methodology. In

conducting the compensation survey, the following specific steps were taken:

Survey employers were contacted to confirm participation and to request background information

including current salary schedules, job descriptions, benefits information, position control documents,

and organizational charts

Source documents were analyzed for each survey agency in order to determine comparability issues and

obtain salary/benefit data

25


7

Follow-up reviews were conducted by e-mail and telephone to verify and clarify the data to ensure

accuracy and comparability.

Throughout the data collection process, careful efforts were made to document the full range of duties and

requirements of all job classes as compared to the Authority’s corresponding survey classes.

When conducting labor market surveys, one of the most important objectives is to ensure that the labor market

data is sufficiently comparable to Authority jobs while also serving as a strong indicator of market trends. Since the

purpose of the labor market analysis is to identify general wage trends with other agencies, broad comparability

guidelines are used when collecting data. If the comparability guidelines are too narrow, then insufficient data will

be found.

Common comparability criteria typically include similar core functional duties, education/skill requirements, level

of duties, and scope of supervisory and management duties. It is not as critical for all job duties to be the same or

for the number of employees supervised to be the same. Furthermore, it is not essential that comparable market

jobs use the same equipment, have the same workload, or work in an identical facility. While Ralph Andersen &

Associates has been careful not to include outlier job comparisons, there will be some variability in the job

matches. In some instances, a comparable market job may exceed the responsibilities and duties of the Authority’s

job and in other cases, the market job may perform duties at a slightly lower level. Overall, the market

comparabilities are intended to provide a balanced indication of market trends.

The data sheets presented in Appendix A contain job matches that are sufficiently comparable based on the

professional judgment of Ralph Andersen & Associates. Wherever possible, comparability similarities and

differences are supported by documentation received from the survey agencies. While job descriptions served as a

starting point for all comparability analysis, they were not the sole source of information used to establish job

matches. Job descriptions can be unreliable (particularly if they are not up to date), not every agency has the same

level of detail in their job descriptions, and many agencies may not have the same philosophy in establishing

minimum qualifications.

The term “No Comparable Class” has been used in the data sheets in Appendix A to indicate instances where the

job does not exist within the survey agency, the level of responsibilities/duties are not sufficiently comparable, or

the comparable job duties are spread among several job classifications.

STATISTICS USED IN ANALYZING THE MARKET DATA

The salary survey data has been analyzed using a variety of statistical measures that are standards in

compensation analysis. The purpose of the statistics is to describe the data and identify data trends that can be

used to describe the labor market. The three most common statistics used in analyzing compensation data include:

Mean (average) – This is a common statistical measure in which the market data is summed and divided

by the number of agencies in which data is reported. While this is a valuable statistical measure, it is not

stable for data sets of less than 30 agencies. In addition, this statistic can be significantly skewed by a

significantly high or low paying agency that may not represent the entire sample.

Median (50th percentile) – This statistic is based on the ranking of the data and represents the “middle”

of the data set; as such, half of the data is above the median and half is below. This is the most stable

statistical measure of the market, even for highly variable data sets, and is not skewed by unusually high

or low payers.

26


8

75th Percentile (3rd quartile) – This is also a rank based statistic in which one quarter of the data is above

the 75th percentile and three quarters of the data are below this point. This statistic effectively captures

the high end of the data set, however, it is not as stable a measure as the median. Since the relationship

between the median and the 75th percentile is based both on the ranking and on variability of the data,

no consistent percentage relationship exists between these statistics.

It is a policy decision as to which market reference point best serves the Authority for purposes of establishing a

competitive salary plan. Our analysis has focused on the market median, which is the most stable statistical

measure.

POINT OF COMPARISON

When comparing Authority salaries with market agencies, it is important to establish a consistent point of

comparison. Since all the survey agencies used in the market study utilize pay range structures, a critical review

was needed to find the salary range “control point.” This is the point in the salary range that:

Is used to “anchor” the pay range to the labor market

Employees will attain through step or other increases based on satisfactory performance (range

progression beyond the control point is usually based on superior job performance)

The majority of employee salaries cluster around as measured by calculating a compa-ratio (employee

salary divided by the range maximum).

For the vast majority of agencies, the salary range maximum (top step) is the reference control point. Longevity

steps, one-time lump sum payments, and incentive pays are not included in this comparison (but are included in

the benefits analysis). These salaries are compared to the Authority’s salary range.

27


9

SECTION III

COMPENSATION FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

This section of the report documents the key findings and observations resulting from the consultant’s

compensation analyses. The focus of the compensation analysis is to identify significant differences in the pay

practices of the Authority as compared to the other labor market agencies. Ideally, the Authority should be

consistent with any pay or benefit item that is a common practice in the market (half or more of the survey

agencies).

SALARY SURVEY RESULTS – BASE PAY

Based on an evaluation of the survey data, general salary trends in the marketplace have been identified. A

summary of the salary survey using all labor market employers is provided in the following graph and includes all

eleven survey employers who participated in the survey. The survey data includes the 1.8% adjustment recently

implemented by the Authority (retroactive to July 1, 2014).

As indicated in the graph, only two survey jobs are more than 5% above the median with 10 jobs being more than

5% below median. Ideally, the Authority’s pay plan should be within /- 5% of the desired market position (in this

case, market median). While increase to market median are appropriate, the above chart serves as a macro level

of assessment – is the Authority’s pay plan generally competitive with the labor market. In this instance, the

answer to that question is no. On average, the authority is almost 7% below the market with some jobs being

more than 20% below median and fewer jobs being slightly above median.

The following summary table that shows the survey results for all jobs where sufficient data was found.

28


10

It should be noted that some of the job comparisons are less of a match than others. In this survey, the only

comparable function found for the Administrative Services Manager was the /ƭŜǊƪ ƻŦ ǘƘŜ Board function, which is

presented in the table as “drift” data. This terms is used because the data represents only a portion of the job

duties and does not account for the projects and programs managed in addition to /ƭŜǊƪ ƻŦ ǘƘŜ Board functions.

These programs and functions have a higher value than the /ƭŜǊƪ ƻŦ ǘƘŜ Board function. The above also includes

data for a Construction Inspector, a function that is part of the Brine Line Pipeline Operator classification.

The data analysis also included a market sample of member agencies only. While this is not an optimal sample and

does not include local public and regional agencies, it may be useful for policy discussion. The graph below shows

Class Title Range Max

# of Obs.

Market Median

% +/- Median Percentile

Accountant 6,089 10 6,479 -6.4% 24Accounting Technician II 4,874 10 5,159 -5.8% 32Administrative Assistant II 4,874 11 5,359 -10.0% 26Clerk of the Board (Drift) Drift 9 10,622 -- --Chief Financial Officer 13,421 8 16,769 -24.9% 0Construction Inspector (Brine Line Pipeline Op II) 7,152 9 6,958 2.7% 54Executive Manager of Engineering and Operations 13,758 10 16,797 -22.1% 15General Manager 19,349 8 22,938 -18.5% 0GIS Analyst II 7,240 7 7,133 1.5% 80GIS Project Manager 8,823 7 9,530 -8.0% 16Information & Technology Manager 11,570 11 11,625 -0.5% 49Manager of Permitting & Pretreatment 9,717 7 9,567 1.5% 52Network Administrator 7,240 9 8,123 -12.2% 9Program Manager 11,095 10 10,898 1.8% 56Project Manager 8,823 9 10,150 -15.0% 14Senior Brine Line Pipeline Operator 7,600 8 6,547 13.9% 68Senior Pretreatment Program Specialist 8,103 7 7,183 11.4% 99Water Resource & Planning Manager 11,859 7 14,829 -25.0% 6

Average 9 -6.8% 35

29


11

the survey results using the five member agencies market sample. Compared to the eleven agency market, the

Authority is 2.1% further below median on average when the five member agencies are used for comparison.

SALARY SURVEY RESULTS – BENEFITS

In order to provide the Authority with a more accurate assessment of how its compensation plan compares with

those of other agencies, Ralph Andersen & Associates collected and analyzed key employer provided benefits for

each survey agency’s comparable class. All comparisons of the Authority to the labor market agencies are based on

the labor market median so that differences in benefit categories can be analyzed in a trend analysis. The total

compensation data is broken into three categories:

Base Salary – This column contains base salary range maximum data for each agency where a comparable

job was identified.

Cash Supplements – These columns display the following cash equivalent benefits:

- longevity pay

- retirement pick-up paid by the employer on behalf of the employee

- deferred compensation paid by the employer

- other cash benefits

A cumulative sub-total follows these columns that sums base salary and cash supplements for each

employer.

Insurances – These columns show the maximum employer contribution for the following insurance

benefits:

- health insurance, including dependent coverage as provided

- dental insurance

- vision insurance

A cumulative sub-total follows these columns that sums base salary, cash supplements and insurances for

each employer

Retirement – These columns show the employer retirement contributions including:

- employer retirement contribution

- employee contributions to the employer portion

- retirement formula

- FICA (Social Security) contributions by the employer

Leave – These columns show the employer provided leave benefits including:

- holidays

- sick days

- administrative and management leave days

A cumulative sub-total follows these columns that sums base salary, cash supplements, insurances, and retirement

for each employer.

30


12

SUMMARY TABLE OF TOTAL COMPENSATION TRENDS

The summary information presented in the following table has been extracted from the detailed total

compensation data sheets presented in Appendix A. The columns in the table present the percentage relationship

between the Authority’s cumulative compensation for each benefit category and the median of the market

agencies. The percentages can be seen in each of the individual total compensation data sheets provided in

Appendix B.

Class Title # of Obs. Base Base +

Cash

Base + Cash +

Insurance

Total Comp (Cash + Ins.

+ Ret.)Accountant 10 -6.4% -3.4% -4.1% -2.2%Accounting Technician II 10 -5.8% -1.1% 1.2% 2.1%Administrative Assistant II 11 -10.0% -6.4% -5.3% -5.5%Clerk of the Board (Drift) 9Chief Financial Officer 8 -24.9% -21.9% -18.3% -23.2%Construction Inspector (Brine Line Pipeline Op II) 9 2.7% 2.7% 2.3% 0.8%Executive Manager of Engineering and Operations 10 -22.1% -18.9% -15.7% -20.2%General Manager 8 -18.5% -22.3% -30.6% -35.1%GIS Analyst II 7 1.5% 4.0% 3.6% 6.2%GIS Project Manager 7 -8.0% -7.5% -7.1% -9.9%Information & Technology Manager 11 -0.5% 2.4% 3.3% -0.1%Manager of Permitting & Pretreatment 7 1.5% 2.4% 1.5% 2.6%Network Administrator 9 -12.2% -11.9% -5.7% -10.4%Program Manager 10 1.8% 4.2% 4.7% 3.5%Project Manager 9 -15.0% -12.6% -6.5% -6.5%Senior Brine Line Pipeline Operator 8 13.9% 17.3% 15.4% 15.1%Senior Pretreatment Program Specialist 7 11.4% 12.2% 9.5% 10.8%Water Resource & Planning Manager 7 -25.0% -19.8% -17.2% -18.1%

Average -6.8% -4.8% -4.1% -5.3%

Each column provides a snapshot of different benefit combinations including:

Base salary

Base salary plus cash benefits

Base salary plus cash and insurance benefits

Base salary plus cash, insurance, and retirement benefits

On average, the Authority’s benefits are not significantly different than the labor market with only a 1.5% variance

in the three benefit snapshots. However, since the Authority is one of seven agencies that pay the employee

retirement contribution (retirement pickup), the Authority should utilize the Base + Cash market reference point

for salary setting purposes. This will ensure that the current benefit practices are considered relative to the labor

market. This is described more specifically later in this report.

CASH AND INSURANCE BENEFITS

As indicated above, there Authority’s benefits package is competitive with the labor market overall. A summary of

the findings from the analysis in Appendix A include the following observations:

31


13

Only one survey agency provides a longevity benefit, consistent with the Authority’s practice.

Seven agencies provide a retirement pick-up benefit, employer retirement contributions made on behalf

of the employee (EPMC). The Authority currently has this benefit and is consistent with market practices.

This benefit will likely phase out of practice over the next several years as agencies implement changes in

response to the California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA).

Seven agencies provide a deferred compensation benefit, a benefit not provided by the Authority. The

Authority should monitor this benefit category in future surveys to ensure market practices are

considered.

The Authority’s insurance benefits are competitive with the labor market with an average combined

insurance benefit (health, dental, vision) that is within two percent of the market median.

The Authority’s leave benefits (holidays, sick days, administrative leave, and vacation) are an average of

one day less than market practices due to a lower vacation accrual rate and a lower number of holidays

Since there are no significant differences in the Authority’s cash, insurance, and leave benefits compared to the

market, there are no immediate changes recommended in this report. However, because retirement pickup

practices will be changing, this benefit should be phased out by shifting the 7% contribution to base salary over the

next two years.

RETIREMENT BENEFITS

While the employer cost of retirement benefits were considered as part of the analysis described in the previous

section, additional analyses were conducted due to the changing market conditions results from the California

Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA). The implementation of this law has created three

different scenarios for comparing retirement tiers between agencies. These include the following:

Majority of Workforce — Since the implementation of PEPRA is relatively recent, a majority of employers

in most agencies are in more generous retirement tiers compared to those that were created in response

to PEPRA. This is an important group of employees because these are the employees that the Authority is

likely attempting to hire when they conduct a recruitment. This tier represents the most experienced

employees in the public sector workforce. This tier is also important because if the Authority’s majority

tier benefit formula is lower than the market, it will be more difficult to retain employees compared to

agencies with a higher benefit formula.

Classic Members — PEPRA implemented provisions for currently covered employees to receive no less

than the retirement benefit formula in place as of December 31, 2012 (the day before PEPRA took effect).

Because of this provision, some employers created a new tier for incoming employees to be placed in.

However, these December 2012 tiers have few employees since they are only a couple years old. They

are a consideration in market surveys because they indicate how easily the Authority can retain

employees.

PEPRA — Employees hired after January 1, 2013 without any prior membership in a California pension

plan are placed in a new set of tiers. Very few employees are in this group and its market value for the

purposes of surveys is widely considered irrelevant. This will change over the next five to ten years as

more employees are in this group.

32


14

The retirement survey data contained in this report is based on the Majority of Workforce group since this group is

critical in assessing the Authority’s ability to recruit experienced employees from other public sector employers as

well as retain current. It is in this group

that the Authority is at a severe

disadvantage compared to other

employers in the survey. As shown in

the following table, the Santa Ana

Watershed Authority is the only agency

that has a 2%@55 retirement formula

for both the Majority Tier and the

Classic Tier. Without considering

vesting in a prior tier, the Authority

would need to pay a salary 25% greater

than a 2.5%@55 plan in order to equal

the same retirement benefit. While this

may not affect employees nearing

retirement as much as new employees,

it is a relevant factor that impacts the

Authority’s ability to recruit

When retention is considered, it is easier for most of the survey employers to retain their employees because the

differential between their majority tier and the classic tier is more significant. For the Authority, employees in the

majority tier are more likely to receive the same benefit level if they left the Authority than an employee in one of

the survey agencies. No other agency in the survey has the same challenge.

When the Classic Tier is compared, the Authority is more competitive with market practices with only three

agencies having a higher benefit, three having the same benefit, and four having a lower benefit.

PEPRA has also had an impact on the retirement pickup practices in the labor market, the practice of the employer

paying the employee portion of the retirement contribution. While this used to be a practice among most

agencies, it is being phased out due to the provisions of PEPRA. In most agencies, reductions in pickup

contributions are traded in exchange for base salary increases that would otherwise have been implemented. In

order to be more consistent with evolving market practices, the Authority should phase out the retirement pickup

benefit as recommended in the next section of this report.

Since there are no significant differences in the Authority’s cash, insurance, and leave benefits compared to the

market, there are no immediate changes recommended in this report. However, because retirement pickup

practices will be changing, this benefit should be phased out by shifting the 7% contribution to base salary over the

next 2 years

SALARY RANGE RECOMMENDATIONS

Since it is impossible to compare all of the Authority’s jobs to comparable market jobs, the objective of a market

based compensation study is to identify wage differences for selected “benchmark” classes. Benchmark classes are

jobs that are easily compared with the pay practices of other agencies and are directly comparable to many

Authority jobs. This process not only maximizes the use of available market data but also preserves important

salary relationships that currently exist in the Authority’s compensation plan.

Appendix B contains recommended salary ranges for each Authority job classification. The process used to

develop the recommendations in Appendix B included the following:

Survey Agency Majority TierDecember

2012 Classic Tier

City of Ontario 2.5%@55 2.5%@55City of Riverside 2.7%@55 2.7%@55Cucamonga MWD 2.5%@55 2%@60Eastern MWD 2.5%@55 2%@55Inland Empire Utilities Agency 2.5%@55 2%@55Irvine Ranch Water District 2.5%@55 2%@60Orange County WD N/A N/ARiverside County 3%@60 2%@60San Bernardino Valley MWD 3%@60 2%@60San Diego County Water Authority 2.5%@55 2.5%@55Western MWD 2.5%@55 2%@55Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 2%@55 2%@55

33


15

Benchmark job classifications have been identified using a detailed analysis of the data presented in

Appendix A. Benchmark classes are set to the labor market median by using a Market Deviation

percentage from the Base + Cash column.

Salary ranges for non-benchmark job classifications have been set using internal relationship salary

differentials. These differentials are based on industry guidelines as well as a review of historical and

current salary relationships. These salary alignments rely heavily on existing salary relationships.

Salary range comparisons are conducted using the range maximum, which serves as the control point for

the market survey ranges as well as the Authority’s ranges. The percentage change from the current

salary range to the new salary range is shown as a percentage change.

As a result of this process, Appendix B contains eleven benchmark jobs that are used to establish pay ranges for 31

job classifications with the appropriate internal alignment documented. Pay ranges are then established by

building steps below the range maximum using 5% increments. Thus, the recommended salary range is a six step

structure with 5% increments that can be used based on annual performance reviews. This is a common market

structure and provides 28% salary growth (the market average is 32%).

Since the salary range and percentage change recommendations contained in Appendix B are based on a Base +

Cash reference point, the Authority’s retirement pickup benefit (EPMC) is fully incorporated. The Authority should

not change its EPMC benefit until after implementing the recommendations resulting from this report. Changing

the Authority’s pickup practices is an anticipatory change that recognizes evolving market practices. The current

practice is consistent with market practices as measured in this study. Once the new salary ranges are

implemented, the Authority can shift all or a portion of the employees retirement contribution to base salary. For

example, proper implementation of the recommendations in this report would be as follows:

1. New salary ranges should be established based on the salary range recommendations in Appendix B.

These should be effective July 1, 2015 since this is the time period of the market survey data.

2. Effective July 1, 2015 (after implementation of the ranges), the Authority should reduce the EPMC benefit

to 3.5% and simultaneously increase the employee’s base salary range by 3.5%.

3. On July 1, 2016, the Authority should reduce the EPMC benefit to 0% (eliminate the benefit) and

simultaneously increase the employee’s base salary range by 3.5%.

If done over a two-year period, this will eliminate this benefit category while aligning with anticipated market pay

practices.

SALARY PLAN MAINTENANCE & ADMINISTRATION

Once the above salary range adjustments are implemented, the Authority should continue to conduct market

surveys every third year to maintain equity with market practices. In the interim years, the Authority can use a

Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) or other market estimate during the budget process to maintain overall equity

with annual changes in the market. This can be done by using an index such as CPI or by conducting a limited

survey of key agencies to determine what overall increase are being implemented that year. A more extensive

market survey every third year will provide additional data regarding changes in labor rates for different Authority

jobs as well as changes in benefit practices.

34

A p p e n d i x

A - 1

APPENDIX A

SURVEY DATASHEETS

35

Ralph Andersen & Associates Data Effective July 2015

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityAccountant 10 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits

Survey Agency Comparable Class Range Max. Long. Ret.

PickupDef.

Comp.Other Cash

Base + Cash Health Dental Vision

Base + Cash +

Ins.City of Ontario Accountant $5,729 $229 $50 $6,009 $1,170 $133 $19 $7,330City of Riverside Accountant II $6,407 $6,407 $1,045 $45 inc $7,497Cucamonga MWD Accountant $6,348 $381 $6,729 $1,617 $170 $21 $8,538Eastern MWD Accountant II $7,133 $285 $98 $107 $7,624 $1,557 $108 $7 $9,296Inland Empire Utilities Agency Accountant II $6,046 $151 $6,197 $1,218 $7,415Irvine Ranch Water District Accountant $6,837 $205 $7,042 $1,391 $136 $24 $8,593Orange County WD Staff Accountant $6,550 $197 $6,747 $1,479 $129 $19 $8,373Riverside County Accountant II $5,838 $5,838 $770 inc inc $6,608San Bernardino Valley MWD No Comparable ClassSan Diego County Water Authority Accountant $7,680 $538 $8,218 $1,598 inc inc $9,816Water Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Accountant II $7,033 $150 $563 $7,746 $1,815 inc inc $9,560Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Accountant $6,089 $426 $6,516 $1,466 $114 $24 $8,119

AccountantAvg Average $6,560 $6,856 $8,303AccountantAvgPct % +/- -7.7% -5.2% -2.3%AccountantMedian Median $6,479 $6,738 $8,455

10 % +/- -6.4% -3.4% -4.1%75th Percentile $6,984 $7,478 $9,120

10 % +/- -14.7% -14.8% -12.3%Median Gain/Loss 3.0% -0.7%

1 Print Date: 7/30/201536


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityAccountant

Survey Agency Comparable Class

City of Ontario AccountantCity of Riverside Accountant IICucamonga MWD AccountantEastern MWD Accountant IIInland Empire Utilities Agency Accountant IIIrvine Ranch Water District AccountantOrange County WD Staff AccountantRiverside County Accountant IISan Bernardino Valley MWD No Comparable ClassSan Diego County Water Authority AccountantWater Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Accountant IISanta Ana Watershed Project Authority Accountant

AccountantAvg AverageAccountantAvgPct % +/-AccountantMedian Median

10 % +/-75th Percentile

10 % +/-

Retirement Benefits Leave Benefits (hours per month)

Emp. Ret.Employee

Ret. Contrib.

Ret. Form. FICA

Base + Cash +

Ins. + Ret.Hol Sick Admin Vac

MaxTotal Leave

$890 2.5%@55 $355 $8,575 9 8 16 33$1,346 2.7%@55 $8,844 7 8 13 29$1,201 2.5%@55 $9,739 9 8 13 30$1,271 2.5%@55 $10,566 7 8 13 29$1,089 2.5%@55 $375 $8,879 13 8 17 37$1,253 2.5%@55 $9,847 8 8 13 29

$894 $9,267 7 8 17 32$901 3%@60 $7,509 8 8 13 29

$1,734 ($538) 2.5%@55 $476 $11,488 9 8 17 33

$1,055 2.5%@55 $436 $11,052 9 8 13 30$802 2%@55 $378 $9,299 7 9 15 31

$9,577 31.2-3.0% -0.5%

$9,503 30.0-2.2% 3.2%

$10,386 32.6-11.7% -5.1%

1.9%

2 Print Date: 7/30/201537


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityAccounting Technician II 10 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits


PickupDef.

Comp.Other Cash


Base + Cash +

Ins.City of Ontario Accounting Technician $4,801 $192 $50 $5,043 $1,170 $133 $19 $6,365City of Riverside Accounting Technician $4,599 $4,599 $1,045 $45 inc $5,689Cucamonga MWD Account Clerk II $4,717 $283 $5,000 $1,617 $170 $21 $6,809Eastern MWD Finance Technician III $5,744 $230 $98 $86 $6,158 $1,557 $108 $7 $7,830Inland Empire Utilities Agency Senior Accounting Technician $4,958 $124 $5,082 $1,218 $6,300Irvine Ranch Water District Senior Accounting Clerk $5,820 $175 $5,995 $1,391 $136 $24 $7,546Orange County WD Senior Account Clerk $4,888 $147 $5,034 $1,479 $129 $19 $6,661Riverside County Accounting Technician II-C $5,359 $108 $5,467 $823 inc $19 $6,309San Bernardino Valley MWD No Comparable ClassSan Diego County Water Authority Accounting Technician $6,150 $430 $6,580 $1,598 inc inc $8,178Water Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Accounting Technician II $5,510 $150 $441 $6,100 $1,815 inc inc $7,915Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Accounting Technician II $4,874 $341 $5,215 $1,466 $114 $24 $6,819

Average $5,255 $5,506 $6,960% +/- -7.8% -5.6% -2.1%

Median $5,159 $5,275 $6,73510 % +/- -5.8% -1.1% 1.2%

75th Percentile $5,685 $6,074 $7,75910 % +/- -16.7% -16.5% -13.8%

Median Gain/Loss 4.7% 2.4%

3 Print Date: 7/30/201538


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityAccounting Technician II


City of Ontario Accounting TechnicianCity of Riverside Accounting TechnicianCucamonga MWD Account Clerk IIEastern MWD Finance Technician IIIInland Empire Utilities Agency Senior Accounting TechnicianIrvine Ranch Water District Senior Accounting ClerkOrange County WD Senior Account ClerkRiverside County Accounting Technician II-CSan Bernardino Valley MWD No Comparable ClassSan Diego County Water Authority Accounting TechnicianWater Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Accounting Technician IISanta Ana Watershed Project Authority Accounting Technician II

Average% +/-

Median10 % +/-

75th Percentile10 % +/-


Emp. Ret.Employee

Ret. Contrib.

Ret. Form. FICA

Base + Cash +


MaxTotal Leave

$746 2.5%@55 $298 $7,409 9 8 16 33$966 2.7%@55 $6,656 7 8 13 29$893 2.5%@55 $7,702 9 8 13 30

$1,023 2.5%@55 $8,853 7 8 13 29$893 2.5%@55 $307 $7,501 9 8 17 34

$1,067 2.5%@55 $8,613 8 8 13 29$667 $7,328 7 8 17 32$827 3%@60 $7,136 8 26 34

$1,388 ($430) 2.5%@55 $381 $9,517 9 8 17 33

$826 2.5%@55 $342 $9,083 9 8 13 30$642 2%@55 $302 $7,762 7 9 15 31

$7,980 31.3-2.8% -1.0%

$7,601 31.22.1% -0.5%

$8,793 33.2-13.3% -7.0%

0.8%

4 Print Date: 7/30/201539


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityAdministrative Assistant II 11 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits


PickupDef.

Comp.Other Cash


Base + Cash +

Ins.City of Ontario Administrative Assistant $4,568 $183 $50 $4,800 $1,170 $133 $19 $6,122City of Riverside Administrative Assistant $4,258 $4,258 $1,045 $45 inc $5,348Cucamonga MWD Administrative Assistant II $5,105 $306 $5,411 $1,617 $170 $21 $7,220Eastern MWD Administrative Assistant II $5,211 $208 $98 $78 $5,596 $1,557 $108 $7 $7,268Inland Empire Utilities Agency Administrative Assistant II $5,759 $144 $5,903 $1,218 $7,121Irvine Ranch Water District Administrative Assistant $7,667 $230 $7,897 $1,391 $136 $24 $9,448Orange County WD Administrative Support Specialist $5,389 $162 $5,550 $1,479 $129 $19 $7,177Riverside County Executive Assistant II $5,359 $108 $5,467 $823 inc $19 $6,309San Bernardino Valley MWD Administrative Assistant $3,561 $285 $3,846 $1,600 $161 $5,607San Diego County Water Authority Administrative Assistant $6,623 $464 $7,086 $1,598 inc inc $8,684Water Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Administrative Assistant I $5,510 $150 $441 $110 $6,211 $1,815 inc inc $8,025Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Administrative Assistant II $4,874 $341 $5,215 $1,466 $114 $24 $6,819

Average $5,364 $5,639 $7,121% +/- -10.1% -8.1% -4.4%

Median $5,359 $5,550 $7,17711 % +/- -10.0% -6.4% -5.3%

75th Percentile $5,634 $6,057 $7,64611 % +/- -15.6% -16.1% -12.1%


5 Print Date: 7/30/201540


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityAdministrative Assistant II


City of Ontario Administrative AssistantCity of Riverside Administrative AssistantCucamonga MWD Administrative Assistant IIEastern MWD Administrative Assistant IIInland Empire Utilities Agency Administrative Assistant IIIrvine Ranch Water District Administrative AssistantOrange County WD Administrative Support SpecialistRiverside County Executive Assistant IISan Bernardino Valley MWD Administrative AssistantSan Diego County Water Authority Administrative AssistantWater Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Administrative Assistant ISanta Ana Watershed Project Authority Administrative Assistant II

Average% +/-

Median11 % +/-



Emp. Ret.Employee

Ret. Contrib.

Ret. Form. FICA

Base + Cash +


MaxTotal Leave

$709 2.5%@55 $283 $7,115 9 8 16 33$895 2.7%@55 $6,243 7 8 13 29$966 2.5%@55 $8,186 9 8 13 30$928 2.5%@55 $8,196 7 8 13 29

$1,038 2.5%@55 $357 $8,515 13 8 17 37$1,405 2.5%@55 $10,854 8 8 13 29

$736 $7,912 7 8 17 32$827 3%@60 $7,136 8 26 34

$1,366 3%@60 $221 $7,194 10 8 13 31$1,495 ($464) 2.5%@55 $411 $10,126 9 8 17 33

$826 2.5%@55 $342 $9,193 9 8 3 13 33$642 2%@55 $302 $7,762 7 9 15 31

$8,243 31.8-6.2% -2.7%

$8,186 32.3-5.5% -4.3%

$8,854 33.0-14.1% -6.5%

-0.2%

6 Print Date: 7/30/201541


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityClerk of the Board (Drift) 9 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits


PickupDef.

Comp.Other Cash


Base + Cash +

Ins.City of Ontario Utilities Administrative Services Manager $10,898 $436 $225 $11,559 $1,230 $133 $19 $12,941City of Riverside Administrative Services Manager $8,931 $50 $8,981 $1,116 $45 inc $10,142Cucamonga MWD Human Resources Manager $11,052 $663 $11,715 $1,617 $170 $21 $13,524Eastern MWD Board Secretary $8,864 $355 $98 $133 $9,450 $1,557 $108 $7 $11,122Inland Empire Utilities Agency Board Secretary/Office Manager $11,400 $285 $11,685 $1,218 $12,903Irvine Ranch Water District No Comparable ClassOrange County WD District Secretary $10,622 $319 $10,940 $1,479 $129 $19 $12,566Riverside County Clerk of the Board $13,244 $108 $13,352 $823 inc $19 $14,194San Bernardino Valley MWD Board Secretary $8,833 $707 $9,539 $1,600 $161 $11,300San Diego County Water Authority Clerk of the Board $7,872 $551 $8,423 $1,598 inc inc $10,021Water Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD No Comparable ClassSanta Ana Watershed Project Authority Clerk of the Board (Drift)

Average $10,191 $10,627 $12,079% +/-

Median $10,622 $10,940 $12,5669 % +/-

75th Percentile $11,052 $11,685 $12,9418 % +/-

Median Gain/Loss #VALUE! #VALUE!

7 Print Date: 7/30/201542


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityClerk of the Board (Drift)


City of Ontario Utilities Administrative Services ManagerCity of Riverside Administrative Services ManagerCucamonga MWD Human Resources ManagerEastern MWD Board SecretaryInland Empire Utilities Agency Board Secretary/Office ManagerIrvine Ranch Water District No Comparable ClassOrange County WD District SecretaryRiverside County Clerk of the BoardSan Bernardino Valley MWD Board SecretarySan Diego County Water Authority Clerk of the BoardWater Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD No Comparable ClassSanta Ana Watershed Project Authority Clerk of the Board (Drift)

Average% +/-

Median9 % +/-



Emp. Ret.Employee

Ret. Contrib.

Ret. Form. FICA

Base + Cash +


MaxTotal Leave

$1,693 2.5%@55 $612 $15,246 9 3 23 35$1,877 2.7%@55 $12,018 7 8 3 15 33$2,091 2.5%@55 $15,615 9 8 1 13 31$1,579 2.5%@55 $12,701 7 8 13 29$2,054 2.5%@55 $612 $15,569 13 8 17 37

$1,450 $14,016 7 8 17 32$2,043 3%@60 $16,238 8 26 34$3,388 3%@60 $548 $15,236 10 8 13 31$1,777 ($551) 2.5%@55 $488 $11,735 9 8 17 33

$14,264 32.9

$15,236 33.3

$15,569 34.0

#VALUE!

8 Print Date: 7/30/201543


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityChief Financial Officer 8 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits


PickupDef.

Comp.Other Cash


Base + Cash +

Ins.City of Ontario Admin Services/Finance Director $16,788 $672 $1,259 $18,718 $1,140 $133 $120 $20,111City of Riverside Finance Director/Treasurer $15,610 $50 $15,660 $1,116 $45 inc $16,821Cucamonga MWD AGM/Chief Financial Officer $16,751 $1,005 $17,756 $1,617 $170 $21 $19,565Eastern MWD No Comparable ClassInland Empire Utilities Agency Chief Financial Officer/Asst GM $16,842 $421 $17,263 $1,218 $18,481Irvine Ranch Water District Executive Director of Finance & Admin $17,224 $517 $17,741 $1,391 $136 $24 $19,292Orange County WD Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer $15,586 $468 $16,054 $1,479 $129 $19 $17,680Riverside County No Comparable ClassSan Bernardino Valley MWD Finance Manager $14,304 $1,144 $15,448 $1,600 $161 $17,209San Diego County Water Authority Director of Finance/Treasurer $16,854 $1,180 $125 $18,159 $1,598 inc inc $19,757Water Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD No Comparable ClassSanta Ana Watershed Project Authority Chief Financial Officer $13,421 $939 $14,361 $1,466 $114 $24 $15,964

Average $16,245 $17,100 $18,615% +/- -21.0% -19.1% -16.6%

Median $16,769 $17,502 $18,8878 % +/- -24.9% -21.9% -18.3%

75th Percentile $16,845 $17,857 $19,6138 % +/- -25.5% -24.3% -22.9%


9 Print Date: 7/30/201544


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityChief Financial Officer


City of Ontario Admin Services/Finance DirectorCity of Riverside Finance Director/TreasurerCucamonga MWD AGM/Chief Financial OfficerEastern MWD No Comparable ClassInland Empire Utilities Agency Chief Financial Officer/Asst GMIrvine Ranch Water District Executive Director of Finance & AdminOrange County WD Treasurer/Chief Financial OfficerRiverside County No Comparable ClassSan Bernardino Valley MWD Finance ManagerSan Diego County Water Authority Director of Finance/TreasurerWater Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD No Comparable ClassSanta Ana Watershed Project Authority Chief Financial Officer

Average% +/-

Median8 % +/-



Emp. Ret.Employee

Ret. Contrib.

Ret. Form. FICA

Base + Cash +


MaxTotal Leave

$2,607 2.5%@55 $612 $23,331 9 4 23 35$3,280 2.7%@55 $20,101 7 8 4 17 36$3,170 2.5%@55 $22,735 9 8 1 13 31

$3,035 2.5%@55 $612 $22,128 10 8 4 20 42$3,157 2.5%@55 $22,449 8 8 13 29$2,127 $19,807 7 8 17 32

$5,486 3%@60 $612 $23,307 10 8 13 31$3,805 ($1,180) 2.5%@55 $612 $22,995 9 8 17 33

$1,767 2%@55 $612 $18,343 7 9 3 15 34$22,107 33.9-20.5% 1.3%

$22,592 32.8-23.2% 4.4%

$23,073 35.5-25.8% -3.4%

-4.9%

10 Print Date: 7/30/201545


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityConstruction Inspector (Brine Line Pipeline Op II) 9 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits


PickupDef.

Comp.Other Cash


Base + Cash +

Ins.City of Ontario Public Works Inspector $6,211 $248 $6,459 $1,185 $35 $6 $7,685City of Riverside Construction Inspector II $6,043 $6,043 $1,045 $45 inc $7,133Cucamonga MWD Lead Engineeering Inspector $7,586 $455 $8,041 $1,617 $170 $21 $9,850Eastern MWD Construction & Safety Inspector II $6,639 $266 $98 $100 $7,102 $1,557 $108 $7 $8,774Inland Empire Utilities Agency No Comparable ClassIrvine Ranch Water District Construction Inspector III $7,684 $231 $7,915 $1,391 $136 $24 $9,466Orange County WD Construction Inspector II $7,962 $239 $8,201 $1,479 $129 $19 $9,828Riverside County Construction Inspector II $8,080 $8,080 $770 inc inc $8,850San Bernardino Valley MWD No Comparable ClassSan Diego County Water Authority Engineering Technician II $6,958 $487 $7,445 $1,598 inc inc $9,043Water Replenishment District of SoCalWestern MWD Engineering Technician II $6,698 $150 $536 $7,384 $1,815 inc inc $9,199Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Brine Line Pipeline Operator II $7,152 $501 $7,652 $1,466 $114 $24 $9,256

Average $7,096 $7,408 $8,870% +/- 0.8% 3.2% 4.2%

Median $6,958 $7,445 $9,0439 % +/- 2.7% 2.7% 2.3%

75th Percentile $7,684 $8,041 $9,4669 % +/- -7.4% -5.1% -2.3%

Median Gain/Loss 0.0% -0.4%

11 Print Date: 7/30/201546


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityConstruction Inspector (Brine Line Pipeline Op II)


City of Ontario Public Works InspectorCity of Riverside Construction Inspector IICucamonga MWD Lead Engineeering InspectorEastern MWD Construction & Safety Inspector IIInland Empire Utilities Agency No Comparable ClassIrvine Ranch Water District Construction Inspector IIIOrange County WD Construction Inspector IIRiverside County Construction Inspector IISan Bernardino Valley MWD No Comparable ClassSan Diego County Water Authority Engineering Technician IIWater Replenishment District of SoCalWestern MWD Engineering Technician IISanta Ana Watershed Project Authority Brine Line Pipeline Operator II

Average% +/-

Median9 % +/-



Emp. Ret.Employee

Ret. Contrib.

Ret. Form. FICA

Base + Cash +


MaxTotal Leave

$965 2.5%@55 $385 $9,035 9 8 15 32$1,270 2.7%@55 $8,403 7 8 13 29$1,435 2.5%@55 $11,286 9 8 13 30$1,183 2.5%@55 $9,957 7 8 13 29

$1,409 2.5%@55 $10,874 8 8 13 29$1,087 $10,914 7 8 17 32$1,247 3%@60 $10,097 8 8 13 29

$1,571 ($487) 2.5%@55 $431 $10,558 9 8 17 33

$1,005 2.5%@55 $415 $10,619 9 8 13 30$941 2%@55 $443 $10,641 7 9 15 31

$10,194 30.44.2% 1.9%

$10,558 30.00.8% 3.2%

$10,874 32.0-2.2% -3.2%

-1.5%

12 Print Date: 7/30/201547


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityExecutive Manager of Engineering and Operations 10 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits


PickupDef.

Comp.Other Cash


Base + Cash +

Ins.City of Ontario Utilities Engineering Division Manager $12,624 $505 $200 $13,329 $1,230 $133 $19 $14,711City of Riverside Engineering Manager $13,513 $50 $13,563 $1,116 $45 inc $14,724Cucamonga MWD Chief Operating Officer $16,751 $1,005 $17,756 $1,522 $160 $20 $19,459Eastern MWD Asst GM of Planning, Eng & Construction $18,907 $756 $98 $284 $20,045 $1,557 $108 $7 $21,717Inland Empire Utilities Agency Executive Manager of Engineering/Asst GM $16,842 $421 $17,263 $1,218 $18,481Irvine Ranch Water District Exec Dir of Engineering & Water Quality $17,224 $517 $17,741 $1,391 $136 $24 $19,292Orange County WD Exec Dir Water Resources & Engineering $15,586 $468 $16,054 $1,479 $129 $19 $17,680Riverside County No Comparable ClassSan Bernardino Valley MWD Manager of Engineering $14,304 $1,144 $15,448 $1,600 $161 $17,209San Diego County Water Authority Director of Engineering $16,854 $1,180 $125 $18,159 $1,598 inc inc $19,757Water Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Asst GM/Chief Operations Officer $18,357 $150 $1,469 $367 $20,343 $1,815 inc inc $22,157Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Executive Manager of Engineering and Operations$13,758 $963 $14,721 $1,466 $114 $24 $16,325

Average $16,096 $16,970 $18,519% +/- -17.0% -15.3% -13.4%

Median $16,797 $17,502 $18,88710 % +/- -22.1% -18.9% -15.7%

75th Percentile $17,132 $18,058 $19,68310 % +/- -24.5% -22.7% -20.6%


13 Print Date: 7/30/201548


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityExecutive Manager of Engineering and Operations


City of Ontario Utilities Engineering Division ManagerCity of Riverside Engineering ManagerCucamonga MWD Chief Operating OfficerEastern MWD Asst GM of Planning, Eng & ConstructionInland Empire Utilities Agency Executive Manager of Engineering/Asst GMIrvine Ranch Water District Exec Dir of Engineering & Water QualityOrange County WD Exec Dir Water Resources & EngineeringRiverside County No Comparable ClassSan Bernardino Valley MWD Manager of EngineeringSan Diego County Water Authority Director of EngineeringWater Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Asst GM/Chief Operations OfficerSanta Ana Watershed Project Authority Executive Manager of Engineering and Operations

Average% +/-

Median10 % +/-



Emp. Ret.Employee

Ret. Contrib.

Ret. Form. FICA

Base + Cash +


MaxTotal Leave

$1,961 2.5%@55 $612 $17,284 9 3 23 35$2,839 2.7%@55 $17,563 7 8 3 15 33$3,170 2.5%@55 $22,628 9 8 2 13 32$3,368 2.5%@55 $25,084 7 8 13 29$3,035 2.5%@55 $612 $22,128 10 8 4 20 42$3,157 2.5%@55 $22,449 8 8 13 29$2,127 $19,807 7 8 17 32

$5,486 3%@60 $612 $23,307 10 8 13 31$3,805 ($1,180) 2.5%@55 $612 $22,995 9 8 17 33

$2,754 2.5%@55 $612 $25,523 9 8 3 13 33$1,811 2%@55 $612 $18,748 7 9 3 15 34

$21,877 33.0-16.7% 3.8%

$22,539 32.8-20.2% 4.4%

$23,229 33.3-23.9% 2.9%

-4.5%

14 Print Date: 7/30/201549


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityGeneral Manager 8 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits


PickupDef.

Comp.Other Cash


Base + Cash +

Ins.City of Ontario No Comparable ClassCity of Riverside No Comparable ClassCucamonga MWD General Manager $20,942 $1,257 $4,607 $26,806 $1,522 $160 $20 $28,508Eastern MWD General Manager $23,245 $930 $98 $1,917 $26,190 $1,557 $108 $7 $27,862Inland Empire Utilities Agency General Manager $23,428 $586 $24,014 $1,218 $25,232Irvine Ranch Water District General Manager $21,484 $645 $22,129 $1,391 $136 $24 $23,680Orange County WD General Manager $19,588 $588 $1,917 $22,092 $1,479 $129 $19 $23,719Riverside County No Comparable ClassSan Bernardino Valley MWD General Manager $22,630 $1,810 $24,441 $1,600 $161 $26,202San Diego County Water Authority General Manager $25,016 $1,751 $417 $27,183 $1,598 inc inc $28,781Water Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD General Manager $23,574 $1,886 $2,122 $27,581 $1,926 $158 $18 $29,684Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority General Manager $19,349 $1,354 $20,703 $20,703

Average $22,488 $25,054 $26,708% +/- -16.2% -21.0% -29.0%

Median $22,938 $25,315 $27,0328 % +/- -18.5% -22.3% -30.6%

75th Percentile $23,465 $26,900 $28,57710 % +/- -21.3% -29.9% -38.0%

Median Gain/Loss -3.7% -8.3%

15 Print Date: 7/30/201550


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityGeneral Manager


City of Ontario No Comparable ClassCity of Riverside No Comparable ClassCucamonga MWD General ManagerEastern MWD General ManagerInland Empire Utilities Agency General ManagerIrvine Ranch Water District General ManagerOrange County WD General ManagerRiverside County No Comparable ClassSan Bernardino Valley MWD General ManagerSan Diego County Water Authority General ManagerWater Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD General ManagerSanta Ana Watershed Project Authority General Manager

Average% +/-

Median8 % +/-



Emp. Ret.Employee

Ret. Contrib.

Ret. Form. FICA

Base + Cash +


MaxTotal Leave

$3,963 2.5%@55 $32,471 9 8 7 20 43$4,140 2.5%@55 $32,002 7 8 13 29$4,221 2.5%@55 $612 $30,065 10 8 4 20 42$3,938 2.5%@55 $27,618 8 8 13 29$2,674 $26,392 7 8 17 32

$8,680 3%@60 $612 $35,494 10 8 13 31$5,647 ($1,751) 2.5%@55 $612 $33,290 9 8 17 33

$3,536 2.5%@55 $612 $33,832 9 8 7 23 47$2,547 2%@55 $612 $23,863 7 9 3 13 33

$31,396 35.9-31.6% -8.7%

$32,236 32.8-35.1% 0.5%

$33,425 42.3-40.1% -28.3%

-4.5%

16 Print Date: 7/30/201551


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityGIS Analyst II 7 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits


PickupDef.

Comp.Other Cash


Base + Cash +

Ins.City of Ontario GIS Analyst $6,158 $246 $6,405 $1,185 $35 $6 $7,631City of Riverside No Comparable ClassCucamonga MWD No Comparable ClassEastern MWD GIS Analyst $7,133 $285 $98 $107 $7,624 $1,557 $108 $7 $9,296Inland Empire Utilities Agency GIS Specialist $6,999 $175 $7,174 $1,218 $8,392Irvine Ranch Water District Engineering Technician III $7,245 $217 $7,462 $1,391 $136 $24 $9,014Orange County WD GIS Analyst $7,222 $217 $7,439 $1,479 $129 $19 $9,065Riverside County GIS Analyst $6,488 $6,488 $770 inc inc $7,258San Bernardino Valley MWD No Comparable ClassSan Diego County Water Authority Information Systems Analyst $8,689 $608 $9,297 $1,598 inc inc $10,896Water Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD No Comparable ClassSanta Ana Watershed Project Authority GIS Analyst II $7,240 $507 $7,747 $1,466 $114 $24 $9,350

GIS Analyst IIAvg Average $7,134 $7,413 $8,793% +/- 1.5% 4.3% 6.0%

Median $7,133 $7,439 $9,0147 % +/- 1.5% 4.0% 3.6%

75th Percentile $7,233 $7,543 $9,1808 % +/- 0.1% 2.6% 1.8%


17 Print Date: 7/30/201552


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityGIS Analyst II


City of Ontario GIS AnalystCity of Riverside No Comparable ClassCucamonga MWD No Comparable ClassEastern MWD GIS AnalystInland Empire Utilities Agency GIS SpecialistIrvine Ranch Water District Engineering Technician IIIOrange County WD GIS AnalystRiverside County GIS AnalystSan Bernardino Valley MWD No Comparable ClassSan Diego County Water Authority Information Systems AnalystWater Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD No Comparable ClassSanta Ana Watershed Project Authority GIS Analyst II

GIS Analyst IIAvg Average% +/-

Median7 % +/-



Emp. Ret.Employee

Ret. Contrib.

Ret. Form. FICA

Base + Cash +


MaxTotal Leave

$957 2.5%@55 $382 $8,969 9 8 15 32

$1,271 2.5%@55 $10,566 7 8 13 29$1,261 2.5%@55 $434 $10,087 9 8 17 34$1,328 2.5%@55 $10,342 8 8 13 29

$986 $10,051 7 8 17 32$1,001 3%@60 $8,259 8 8 13 29

$1,962 ($608) 2.5%@55 $539 $12,788 9 8 17 33

$953 2%@55 $449 $10,752 7 9 15 31$10,152 31.3

5.6% -0.9%$10,087 32.0

6.2% -3.2%$10,454 32.8

2.8% -5.9%2.6%

18 Print Date: 7/30/201553


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityGIS Project Manager 7 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits


PickupDef.

Comp.Other Cash


Base + Cash +

Ins.City of Ontario Information Technology Applications Mgr $10,383 $415 $200 $10,998 $1,230 $133 $19 $12,380City of Riverside No Comparable ClassCucamonga MWD No Comparable ClassEastern MWD Mapping/GIS Manager $9,530 $381 $98 $143 $10,153 $1,557 $108 $7 $11,825Inland Empire Utilities Agency No Comparable ClassIrvine Ranch Water District GIS Supervisor $8,982 $269 $9,251 $1,391 $136 $24 $10,803Orange County WD GIS Supervisor/Coordinator $10,622 $319 $10,940 $1,479 $129 $19 $12,567Riverside County GIS Supervisor Analyst $8,282 $8,282 $770 inc inc $9,052San Bernardino Valley MWD GIS Coordinator $8,833 $707 $9,539 $1,600 $161 $11,300San Diego County Water Authority IS Supv: Geographical Information Systems $10,587 $741 $11,328 $1,598 inc inc $12,926Water Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD No Comparable ClassSanta Ana Watershed Project Authority GIS Project Manager $8,823 $618 $9,440 $1,466 $114 $24 $11,044

Average $9,603 $10,070 $11,550% +/- -8.8% -6.7% -4.6%

Median $9,530 $10,153 $11,8257 % +/- -8.0% -7.5% -7.1%

75th Percentile $10,485 $10,969 $12,4738 % +/- -18.8% -16.2% -12.9%


19 Print Date: 7/30/201554


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityGIS Project Manager


City of Ontario Information Technology Applications MgrCity of Riverside No Comparable ClassCucamonga MWD No Comparable ClassEastern MWD Mapping/GIS ManagerInland Empire Utilities Agency No Comparable ClassIrvine Ranch Water District GIS SupervisorOrange County WD GIS Supervisor/CoordinatorRiverside County GIS Supervisor AnalystSan Bernardino Valley MWD GIS CoordinatorSan Diego County Water Authority IS Supv: Geographical Information SystemsWater Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD No Comparable ClassSanta Ana Watershed Project Authority GIS Project Manager

Average% +/-

Median7 % +/-



Emp. Ret.Employee

Ret. Contrib.

Ret. Form. FICA

Base + Cash +


MaxTotal Leave

$1,613 2.5%@55 $612 $14,604 9 3 23 35

$1,698 2.5%@55 $13,522 7 8 13 29

$1,646 2.5%@55 $12,449 8 8 13 29$1,450 $14,016 7 8 17 32$1,278 3%@60 $10,330 8 8 13 29$3,388 3%@60 $548 $15,236 10 8 13 31$2,390 ($741) 2.5%@55 $612 $15,187 9 8 17 33

$1,161 2%@55 $547 $12,752 7 9 15 31$13,621 31.3

-6.8% -0.9%$14,016 31.3

-9.9% -1.1%$14,896 32.8-16.8% -5.9%

-2.8%

20 Print Date: 7/30/201555


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityInformation & Technology Manager 11 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits


PickupDef.

Comp.Other Cash


Base + Cash +

Ins.City of Ontario IT Systems Manager $10,382 $415 $200 $10,997 $1,230 $133 $19 $12,379City of Riverside Business Systems Support Manager $9,383 $50 $9,433 $1,116 $45 inc $10,594Cucamonga MWD Information Technology Manager $11,052 $663 $11,715 $1,617 $170 $21 $13,524Eastern MWD Director of Information Systems $12,726 $509 $98 $191 $13,525 $1,557 $108 $7 $15,196Inland Empire Utilities Agency Manager of Business Information Services $12,568 $314 $12,882 $1,218 $14,100Irvine Ranch Water District Networking & Support Manager $11,625 $349 $11,974 $1,391 $136 $24 $13,525Orange County WD Director of Information Services/Property $14,844 $445 $15,289 $1,479 $129 $19 $16,915Riverside County IT Officer II $12,556 $108 $12,664 $823 inc $19 $13,506San Bernardino Valley MWD Manager of Information Systems $9,845 $788 $10,632 $1,600 $161 $12,393San Diego County Water Authority Information Systems Manager $13,460 $942 $125 $14,528 $1,598 inc inc $16,126Water Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Information Technology Manager $10,847 $150 $868 $217 $12,082 $1,815 inc inc $13,897Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Information & Technology Manager $11,570 $810 $12,380 $1,466 $114 $24 $13,984

Average $11,753 $12,338 $13,832% +/- -1.6% 0.3% 1.1%

Median $11,625 $12,082 $13,52511 % +/- -0.5% 2.4% 3.3%

75th Percentile $12,647 $13,203 $14,64811 % +/- -9.3% -6.7% -4.8%


21 Print Date: 7/30/201556


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityInformation & Technology Manager


City of Ontario IT Systems ManagerCity of Riverside Business Systems Support ManagerCucamonga MWD Information Technology ManagerEastern MWD Director of Information SystemsInland Empire Utilities Agency Manager of Business Information ServicesIrvine Ranch Water District Networking & Support ManagerOrange County WD Director of Information Services/PropertyRiverside County IT Officer IISan Bernardino Valley MWD Manager of Information SystemsSan Diego County Water Authority Information Systems ManagerWater Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Information Technology ManagerSanta Ana Watershed Project Authority Information & Technology Manager

Average% +/-

Median11 % +/-



Emp. Ret.Employee

Ret. Contrib.

Ret. Form. FICA

Base + Cash +


MaxTotal Leave

$1,613 2.5%@55 $612 $14,604 9 3 23 35$1,972 2.7%@55 $12,565 7 8 4 17 36$2,091 2.5%@55 $15,615 9 8 1 13 31$2,267 2.5%@55 $17,463 7 8 13 29$2,264 2.5%@55 $612 $16,977 13 8 17 37$2,131 2.5%@55 $15,656 8 8 13 29$2,026 $18,942 7 8 17 32$1,937 3%@60 $15,443 8 26 34$3,776 3%@60 $610 $16,780 10 8 13 31$3,039 ($942) 2.5%@55 $612 $18,835 9 8 17 33

$1,627 2.5%@55 $612 $16,136 9 8 3 13 33$1,523 2%@55 $612 $16,119 7 9 3 15 34

$16,274 32.9-1.0% 4.2%

$16,136 33.3-0.1% 2.9%

$17,220 34.3-6.8% 0.0%

-3.4%

22 Print Date: 7/30/201557


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityManager of Permitting & Pretreatment 7 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits


PickupDef.

Comp.Other Cash


Base + Cash +

Ins.City of Ontario Environmental Programs Manager $7,991 $320 $200 $8,511 $1,230 $133 $19 $9,893City of Riverside Environmental Services Coordinator $8,795 $50 $8,845 $1,116 $45 inc $10,006Cucamonga MWD No Comparable ClassEastern MWD Source Control Manager $9,530 $381 $98 $143 $10,153 $1,557 $108 $7 $11,825Inland Empire Utilities Agency Deputy Manager of Planning & Environmental Resources$11,970 $299 $12,269 $1,218 $13,487Irvine Ranch Water District Regulatory Compliance Manager $9,567 $287 $9,854 $1,391 $136 $24 $11,405Orange County WD No Comparable ClassRiverside County Principal Management Analyst $11,297 $108 $11,405 $823 inc $19 $12,247San Bernardino Valley MWD No Comparable ClassSan Diego County Water Authority No Comparable ClassWater Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Source Control Program Manager $10,847 $150 $868 $217 $12,082 $1,815 inc inc $13,897Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Manager of Permitting & Pretreatment $9,717 $680 $10,397 $1,466 $114 $24 $12,001

Average $10,000 $10,446 $11,823% +/- -2.9% -0.5% 1.5%

Median $9,567 $10,153 $11,8257 % +/- 1.5% 2.4% 1.5%

75th Percentile $11,072 $11,744 $12,8677 % +/- -13.9% -12.9% -7.2%


23 Print Date: 7/30/201558


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityManager of Permitting & Pretreatment


City of Ontario Environmental Programs ManagerCity of Riverside Environmental Services CoordinatorCucamonga MWD No Comparable ClassEastern MWD Source Control ManagerInland Empire Utilities Agency Deputy Manager of Planning & Environmental ResourcesIrvine Ranch Water District Regulatory Compliance ManagerOrange County WD No Comparable ClassRiverside County Principal Management AnalystSan Bernardino Valley MWD No Comparable ClassSan Diego County Water Authority No Comparable ClassWater Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Source Control Program ManagerSanta Ana Watershed Project Authority Manager of Permitting & Pretreatment

Average% +/-

Median7 % +/-



Emp. Ret.Employee

Ret. Contrib.

Ret. Form. FICA

Base + Cash +


MaxTotal Leave

$1,241 2.5%@55 $495 $11,629 9 3 23 35$1,848 2.7%@55 $11,853 7 8 3 15 33

$1,698 2.5%@55 $13,522 7 8 13 29$2,157 2.5%@55 $612 $16,256 11 8 17 36$1,754 2.5%@55 $13,159 8 8 13 29

$1,743 3%@60 $13,990 8 26 34

$1,627 2.5%@55 $612 $16,136 9 8 3 13 33$1,279 2%@55 $602 $13,883 7 9 15 31

$13,792 32.80.7% -5.7%

$13,522 33.32.6% -7.5%

$15,063 34.3-8.5% -10.8%

1.1%

24 Print Date: 7/30/201559


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityNetwork Administrator 9 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits


PickupDef.

Comp.Other Cash


Base + Cash +

Ins.City of Ontario Senior IT Specialist $6,158 $246 $50 $6,455 $1,170 $133 $19 $7,776City of Riverside Senior Network Support Specialist $7,647 $7,647 $1,045 $45 inc $8,737Cucamonga MWD No Comparable ClassEastern MWD Systems Administrator II $8,244 $330 $98 $124 $8,795 $1,557 $108 $7 $10,467Inland Empire Utilities Agency Network Administrator $8,455 $211 $8,667 $1,218 $9,885Irvine Ranch Water District Network Administrator $7,911 $237 $8,148 $1,391 $136 $24 $9,700Orange County WD Network Administrator $8,778 $263 $9,042 $1,479 $129 $19 $10,668Riverside County IT Network Administrator II $7,590 $7,590 $770 inc inc $8,360San Bernardino Valley MWD No Comparable ClassSan Diego County Water Authority Network Administrator $9,591 $671 $10,263 $1,598 inc inc $11,861Water Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Information Technology Specialist III $8,123 $150 $650 $8,923 $1,815 inc inc $10,738Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Network Administrator $7,240 $507 $7,747 $1,466 $114 $24 $9,350

Average $8,055 $8,392 $9,799% +/- -11.3% -8.3% -4.8%

Median $8,123 $8,667 $9,8859 % +/- -12.2% -11.9% -5.7%

75th Percentile $8,455 $8,923 $10,6689 % +/- -16.8% -15.2% -14.1%


25 Print Date: 7/30/201560


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityNetwork Administrator


City of Ontario Senior IT SpecialistCity of Riverside Senior Network Support SpecialistCucamonga MWD No Comparable ClassEastern MWD Systems Administrator IIInland Empire Utilities Agency Network AdministratorIrvine Ranch Water District Network AdministratorOrange County WD Network AdministratorRiverside County IT Network Administrator IISan Bernardino Valley MWD No Comparable ClassSan Diego County Water Authority Network AdministratorWater Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Information Technology Specialist IIISanta Ana Watershed Project Authority Network Administrator

Average% +/-

Median9 % +/-



Emp. Ret.Employee

Ret. Contrib.

Ret. Form. FICA

Base + Cash +


MaxTotal Leave

$957 2.5%@55 $382 $9,115 9 8 16 33$1,607 2.7%@55 $10,343 7 8 13 29

$1,468 2.5%@55 $11,935 7 8 13 29$1,523 2.5%@55 $524 $11,932 10 8 17 35$1,450 2.5%@55 $11,150 8 8 13 29$1,198 $11,866 7 8 17 32$1,171 3%@60 $9,531 8 8 13 29

$2,165 ($671) 2.5%@55 $595 $13,949 9 8 17 33

$1,218 2.5%@55 $504 $12,460 9 8 13 30$953 2%@55 $449 $10,752 7 9 15 31

$11,365 31.0-5.7% 0.0%

$11,866 30.0-10.4% 3.2%

$11,935 32.7-11.0% -5.4%

-4.6%

26 Print Date: 7/30/201561


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityProgram Manager 10 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits


PickupDef.

Comp.Other Cash


Base + Cash +

Ins.City of Ontario Principal Engineer $10,726 $429 $200 $11,355 $1,230 $133 $19 $12,736City of Riverside Senior Engineer $10,150 $50 $10,200 $1,116 $45 inc $11,361Cucamonga MWD Senior Engineer $10,647 $639 $11,286 $1,617 $170 $21 $13,095Eastern MWD Senior Civil Engineer $11,840 $474 $98 $178 $12,589 $1,557 $108 $7 $14,261Inland Empire Utilities Agency Senior Engineer $9,794 $245 $10,039 $1,218 $11,257Irvine Ranch Water District Senior Engineer $11,071 $332 $11,403 $1,391 $136 $24 $12,954Orange County WD Senior Engineer $10,622 $319 $10,940 $1,479 $129 $19 $12,566Riverside County Engineering Project Manager $11,716 $108 $11,824 $823 inc $19 $12,666San Bernardino Valley MWD No Comparable ClassSan Diego County Water Authority Senior Engineer $11,686 $818 $12,504 $1,598 inc inc $14,102Water Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Senior Engineer $11,662 $150 $933 $233 $12,978 $1,815 inc inc $14,792Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Program Manager $11,095 $777 $11,872 $1,466 $114 $24 $13,476

Average $10,991 $11,512 $12,979% +/- 0.9% 3.0% 3.7%

Median $10,898 $11,379 $12,84510 % +/- 1.8% 4.2% 4.7%

75th Percentile $11,680 $12,334 $13,85010 % +/- -5.3% -3.9% -2.8%


27 Print Date: 7/30/201562


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityProgram Manager


City of Ontario Principal EngineerCity of Riverside Senior EngineerCucamonga MWD Senior EngineerEastern MWD Senior Civil EngineerInland Empire Utilities Agency Senior EngineerIrvine Ranch Water District Senior EngineerOrange County WD Senior EngineerRiverside County Engineering Project ManagerSan Bernardino Valley MWD No Comparable ClassSan Diego County Water Authority Senior EngineerWater Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Senior EngineerSanta Ana Watershed Project Authority Program Manager

Average% +/-

Median10 % +/-



Emp. Ret.Employee

Ret. Contrib.

Ret. Form. FICA

Base + Cash +


MaxTotal Leave

$1,666 2.5%@55 $612 $15,015 9 3 23 35$2,133 2.7%@55 $13,493 7 8 3 15 33$2,015 2.5%@55 $15,109 9 8 1 13 31$2,109 2.5%@55 $16,370 7 8 13 29$1,765 2.5%@55 $607 $13,629 10 8 17 35$2,029 2.5%@55 $14,984 8 8 13 29$1,450 $14,016 7 8 17 32$1,808 3%@60 $14,474 8 26 34

$2,638 ($818) 2.5%@55 $612 $16,535 9 8 17 33

$1,749 2.5%@55 $612 $17,154 9 8 3 13 33$1,460 2%@55 $612 $15,549 7 9 15 31

$15,078 32.53.0% -4.8%

$14,999 33.33.5% -7.5%

$16,055 33.8-3.3% -9.1%

-1.1%

28 Print Date: 7/30/201563


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityProject Manager 9 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits


PickupDef.

Comp.Other Cash


Base + Cash +

Ins.City of Ontario Utilities Project Manager $8,711 $348 $9,059 $1,185 $35 $6 $10,285City of Riverside Senior Engineer $10,150 $50 $10,200 $1,116 $45 inc $11,361Cucamonga MWD No Comparable ClassEastern MWD Civil Engineer II $10,246 $410 $98 $154 $10,908 $1,557 $108 $7 $12,579Inland Empire Utilities Agency Associate Engineer $8,507 $213 $8,720 $1,218 $9,938Irvine Ranch Water District Engineer $9,918 $298 $10,216 $1,391 $136 $24 $11,767Orange County WD No Comparable ClassRiverside County Senior Engineer $10,808 $10,808 $770 inc inc $11,578San Bernardino Valley MWD Project Manager $9,845 $788 $10,632 $1,600 $161 $12,393San Diego County Water Authority Engineer (PE) $10,587 $741 $11,328 $1,598 inc inc $12,926Water Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Principal Engineer $12,536 $150 $1,003 $251 $13,940 $1,815 inc inc $15,754Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Project Manager $8,823 $618 $9,440 $1,466 $114 $24 $11,044

Average $10,145 $10,646 $12,065% +/- -15.0% -12.8% -9.2%

Median $10,150 $10,632 $11,7679 % +/- -15.0% -12.6% -6.5%

75th Percentile $10,587 $10,908 $12,5799 % +/- -20.0% -15.5% -13.9%


29 Print Date: 7/30/201564


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityProject Manager


City of Ontario Utilities Project ManagerCity of Riverside Senior EngineerCucamonga MWD No Comparable ClassEastern MWD Civil Engineer IIInland Empire Utilities Agency Associate EngineerIrvine Ranch Water District EngineerOrange County WD No Comparable ClassRiverside County Senior EngineerSan Bernardino Valley MWD Project ManagerSan Diego County Water Authority Engineer (PE)Water Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Principal EngineerSanta Ana Watershed Project Authority Project Manager

Average% +/-

Median9 % +/-



Emp. Ret.Employee

Ret. Contrib.

Ret. Form. FICA

Base + Cash +


MaxTotal Leave

$1,353 2.5%@55 $540 $12,178 9 8 15 32$2,133 2.7%@55 $13,493 7 8 3 15 33

$1,825 2.5%@55 $14,404 7 8 13 29$1,533 2.5%@55 $527 $11,998 13 8 17 37$1,818 2.5%@55 $13,585 8 8 13 29

$1,668 3%@60 $13,246 8 8 13 29$3,776 3%@60 $610 $16,780 10 8 13 31$2,390 ($741) 2.5%@55 $612 $15,187 9 8 17 33

$1,880 2.5%@55 $612 $18,247 9 8 3 13 33$1,161 2%@55 $547 $12,752 7 9 15 31

$14,346 32.0-12.5% -3.2%

$13,585 32.0-6.5% -3.2%

$15,187 33.3-19.1% -7.5%

0.0%

30 Print Date: 7/30/201565


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthoritySenior Brine Line Pipeline Operator 8 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits


PickupDef.

Comp.Other Cash


Base + Cash +

Ins.City of Ontario Senior Utilities Technician $4,957 $198 $5,155 $1,170 $30 $6 $6,361City of Riverside Sr Wastewater Collection System Tech $5,645 $50 $5,695 $1,116 $45 inc $6,856Cucamonga MWD No Comparable ClassEastern MWD Collections Systems Utility Crew Leader $6,176 $247 $98 $93 $6,614 $1,557 $108 $7 $8,285Inland Empire Utilities Agency Senior Collection System Operator $6,644 $166 $6,810 $1,218 $8,028Irvine Ranch Water District Senior Collection Systems Technician $6,450 $194 $6,644 $1,391 $136 $24 $8,195Orange County WD Lead Maintenance Technican $8,361 $251 $8,611 $1,479 $129 $19 $10,238Riverside County No Comparable ClassSan Bernardino Valley MWD No Comparable ClassSan Diego County Water Authority Senior Maintenance Technician $7,872 $551 $8,423 $1,598 inc inc $10,021Water Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Senior Operations Technician II $8,123 $150 $650 $8,923 $1,815 inc inc $10,738Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Senior Brine Line Pipeline Operator $7,600 $532 $8,132 $1,466 $114 $24 $9,736

Average $6,778 $7,109 $8,590% +/- 10.8% 12.6% 11.8%

Median $6,547 $6,727 $8,2408 % +/- 13.9% 17.3% 15.4%

75th Percentile $7,935 $8,470 $10,0758 % +/- -4.4% -4.2% -3.5%


31 Print Date: 7/30/201566


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthoritySenior Brine Line Pipeline Operator


City of Ontario Senior Utilities TechnicianCity of Riverside Sr Wastewater Collection System TechCucamonga MWD No Comparable ClassEastern MWD Collections Systems Utility Crew LeaderInland Empire Utilities Agency Senior Collection System OperatorIrvine Ranch Water District Senior Collection Systems TechnicianOrange County WD Lead Maintenance TechnicanRiverside County No Comparable ClassSan Bernardino Valley MWD No Comparable ClassSan Diego County Water Authority Senior Maintenance TechnicianWater Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Senior Operations Technician IISanta Ana Watershed Project Authority Senior Brine Line Pipeline Operator

Average% +/-

Median8 % +/-



Emp. Ret.Employee

Ret. Contrib.

Ret. Form. FICA

Base + Cash +


MaxTotal Leave

$770 2.5%@55 $307 $7,438 9 8 15 32$1,186 2.7%@55 $8,042 7 8 3 15 33

$1,100 2.5%@55 $9,385 7 8 13 29$1,197 2.5%@55 $412 $9,638 9 8 17 34$1,182 2.5%@55 $9,377 8 8 13 29$1,141 $11,379 7 8 17 32

$1,777 ($551) 2.5%@55 $488 $11,735 9 8 17 33

$1,218 2.5%@55 $504 $12,460 9 8 13 30$1,000 2%@55 $471 $11,207 7 9 15 31

$9,932 31.611.4% -2.0%$9,511 32.215.1% -3.8%

$11,468 33.3-2.3% -7.5%

-0.2%

32 Print Date: 7/30/201567


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthoritySenior Pretreatment Program Specialist 7 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits


PickupDef.

Comp.Other Cash


Base + Cash +

Ins.City of Ontario No Comparable ClassCity of Riverside Senior Environmental Compliance Inspector $6,351 $50 $6,401 $1,116 $45 inc $7,562Cucamonga MWD Industrial Waste Inspector III $7,183 $431 $7,614 $1,617 $170 $21 $9,423Eastern MWD Senior Source Control Inspector $7,133 $285 $98 $107 $7,624 $1,557 $108 $7 $9,295Inland Empire Utilities Agency Sr Pretreatment & Source Control Inspector $6,644 $166 $6,810 $1,218 $8,028Irvine Ranch Water District Senior Scientist $7,684 $231 $7,915 $1,391 $136 $24 $9,466Orange County WD No Comparable ClassRiverside County Senior Environmental Compliance Inspector $7,537 $7,537 $770 inc inc $8,307San Bernardino Valley MWD No Comparable ClassSan Diego County Water Authority No Comparable ClassWater Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Source Control Program Specialist II $8,123 $150 $650 $8,923 $1,815 inc inc $10,738Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Senior Pretreatment Program Specialist $8,103 $567 $8,670 $1,466 $114 $24 $10,274

Average $7,236 $7,546 $8,974% +/- 10.7% 13.0% 12.6%

Median $7,183 $7,614 $9,2957 % +/- 11.4% 12.2% 9.5%

75th Percentile $7,611 $7,769 $9,4448 % +/- 6.1% 10.4% 8.1%


33 Print Date: 7/30/201568


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthoritySenior Pretreatment Program Specialist


City of Ontario No Comparable ClassCity of Riverside Senior Environmental Compliance InspectorCucamonga MWD Industrial Waste Inspector IIIEastern MWD Senior Source Control InspectorInland Empire Utilities Agency Sr Pretreatment & Source Control InspectorIrvine Ranch Water District Senior ScientistOrange County WD No Comparable ClassRiverside County Senior Environmental Compliance InspectorSan Bernardino Valley MWD No Comparable ClassSan Diego County Water Authority No Comparable ClassWater Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Source Control Program Specialist IISanta Ana Watershed Project Authority Senior Pretreatment Program Specialist

Average% +/-

Median7 % +/-



Emp. Ret.Employee

Ret. Contrib.

Ret. Form. FICA

Base + Cash +


MaxTotal Leave

$1,334 2.7%@55 $8,896 7 8 3 15 33$1,359 2.5%@55 $10,782 9 8 13 30$1,271 2.5%@55 $10,566 7 8 13 29$1,197 2.5%@55 $412 $9,638 9 8 17 34$1,409 2.5%@55 $10,874 8 8 13 29

$1,163 3%@60 $9,470 8 8 13 29

$1,218 2.5%@55 $504 $12,460 9 8 13 30$1,067 2%@55 $502 $11,843 7 9 15 31

$10,384 30.712.3% 1.1%

$10,566 30.010.8% 3.2%

$10,828 31.78.6% -2.2%1.3%

34 Print Date: 7/30/201569


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityWater Resource & Planning Manager 7 Cash Supplements Insurance Benefits


PickupDef.

Comp.Other Cash


Base + Cash +

Ins.City of Ontario Water Resources Manager $10,726 $429 $200 $11,355 $1,230 $133 $19 $12,736City of Riverside Utilties Asst GM/Water Delivery $14,829 $50 $14,879 $1,116 $45 inc $16,040Cucamonga MWD No Comparable ClassEastern MWD No Comparable ClassInland Empire Utilities Agency Mgr of Planning & Environmental Resources $13,856 $346 $14,202 $1,218 $15,420Irvine Ranch Water District Director of Water Resources $14,756 $443 $15,199 $1,391 $136 $24 $16,750Orange County WD Exec Dir Planning & Natural Resources $15,586 $468 $16,054 $1,479 $129 $19 $17,680Riverside County No Comparable ClassSan Bernardino Valley MWD No Comparable ClassSan Diego County Water Authority Director of Water Resources $16,854 $1,180 $125 $18,159 $1,598 inc inc $19,757Water Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Director of Water Resources $15,169 $150 $1,214 $303 $16,836 $1,815 inc inc $18,651Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Water Resource & Planning Manager $11,859 $830 $12,690 $1,466 $114 $24 $14,293

Average $14,539 $15,241 $16,719% +/- -22.6% -20.1% -17.0%

Median $14,829 $15,199 $16,7507 % +/- -25.0% -19.8% -17.2%

75th Percentile $15,378 $16,445 $18,1657 % +/- -29.7% -29.6% -27.1%


35 Print Date: 7/30/201570


Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityWater Resource & Planning Manager


City of Ontario Water Resources ManagerCity of Riverside Utilties Asst GM/Water DeliveryCucamonga MWD No Comparable ClassEastern MWD No Comparable ClassInland Empire Utilities Agency Mgr of Planning & Environmental ResourcesIrvine Ranch Water District Director of Water ResourcesOrange County WD Exec Dir Planning & Natural ResourcesRiverside County No Comparable ClassSan Bernardino Valley MWD No Comparable ClassSan Diego County Water Authority Director of Water ResourcesWater Replenishment District of SoCal Data not AvailableWestern MWD Director of Water ResourcesSanta Ana Watershed Project Authority Water Resource & Planning Manager

Average% +/-

Median7 % +/-



Emp. Ret.Employee

Ret. Contrib.

Ret. Form. FICA

Base + Cash +


MaxTotal Leave

$1,666 2.5%@55 $612 $15,015 9 3 23 35$3,116 2.7%@55 $19,155 7 8 3 15 33

$2,497 2.5%@55 $612 $18,529 13 8 17 37$2,705 2.5%@55 $19,455 8 8 13 29$2,127 $19,807 7 8 17 32

$3,805 ($1,180) 2.5%@55 $612 $22,995 9 8 17 33

$2,275 2.5%@55 $612 $21,539 9 8 3 13 33$1,561 2%@55 $612 $16,467 7 9 3 15 34

$19,499 33.4-18.4% 2.8%

$19,455 33.3-18.1% 2.9%

$20,673 34.0-25.5% 1.0%

-1.0%

36 Print Date: 7/30/201571

A p p e n d i x

Page B - 1

APPENDIX B

SALARY RANGE RECOMMENDATIONS

72

Ralph Andersen & Associates

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthoritySalary Recommendations

Benchmark Classes set to Market Median, Base + Cash

Option 1 - Structured Internal Relationships

Lin

e

Classification Job TitleCurrent

Range Max

Market

Deviation

Recomm.

Range

Max

Percent

ChangeInternal Alignment/Salary Setting Rationale

1 Executive Counsel 15,043$ 17,993$ 19.6% Approx. 10% above Executive Manager of Engineering and Operations

2

3 Administrative Services Manager 11,013$ 13,142$ 19.3% Approx. 15% above Senior Project Manager

4 Senior Project Specialist New 6,590$ -- Approx. 10% above Project Specialist II

5 Project Specialist II New 5,991$ -- Approx. 10% above Project Specialist I

6 Project Specialist I New 5,446$ -- Approx. 5% above Administrative Assistant II

7 Senior Administrative Assistant 5,657$ 5,705$ 0.9% Approx. 10% above Administrative Assistant II

8 Administrative Assistant II 4,873$ -6.4% 5,187$ 6.4% Benchmark; set to market

9 Administrative Assistant I 4,205$ 4,510$ 7.3% Approx. 15% below Administrative Assistant II

10

11 Executive Manager of Engineering and Operations 13,758$ -18.9% 16,357$ 18.9% Benchmark; set to market

12 Program Manager 11,095$ 12,570$ 13.3% Approx. 10% above Senior Project Manager

13 Manager of Permitting & Pretreatment 9,717$ 10,634$ 9.4% Approx. 20% above Senior Pretreatment Program Specialist

14 Senior Project Manager 9,981$ 11,428$ 14.5% Approx. 15% above Project Manager

15 Project Manager 8,823$ -12.6% 9,937$ 12.6% Benchmark; set to market

16

17 Senior Pretreatment Program Specialist 8,102$ 8,862$ 9.4% Approx. 10% above Pretreatment Program Specialist

18 Pretreatment Program Specialist -- 8,056$ -- Approx. 5% above Brine Line Pipeline Operator II

19

20 Senior Brine Line Pipeline Operator 7,599$ 8,440$ 11.1% Approx. 10% above Brine Line Pipeline Operator II

21 Brine Line Pipeline Operator II 7,151$ -7.3% 7,673$ 7.3% Benchmark; set to market (10% above Construction Inspector Data)

22 Brine Line Pipeline Operator I 4,745$ 6,138$ 29.4% Approx. 25% below Brine Line Pipeline Operator II

23

24 Chief Financial Officer 13,421$ -21.9% 15,957$ 18.9% Benchmark; set to market; maint alignment w/ Exec Mgr of Eng and Ops

25 Accountant/Project Manager 7,493$ 7,557$ 0.8% Approx. 20% above Accountant

26 Accountant 6,090$ -3.4% 6,297$ 3.4% Benchmark; set to market

27 Senior Accounting Technician 5,657$ 5,705$ 0.9% Approx. 10% above Accounting Technician II

28 Accounting Technician II 4,873$ -1.1% 5,187$ 6.4% Benchmark; set to market; same as Admin Asst II

29 Accounting Technician I 4,205$ 4,510$ 7.3% Approx. 15% below Accounting Technician II

30

31 Information & Technology Manager 11,570$ +2.4% 11,570$ 0.0% Benchmark; set to market; SCS*

32 GIS Project Manager 8,823$ -7.5% 9,489$ 7.5% Benchmark; set to market

33 GIS Analyst II/ Network Administrator 7,240$ -11.9% 8,100$ 11.9% Benchmark; set to market

34

35 Water Resource & Planning Manager 11,860$ -19.8% 14,205$ 19.8% Benchmark; set to market

36 Principal Watershed Manager New 12,570$ -- Approx. 10% above Senior Watershed Manager

37 Senior Watershed Manager 9,981$ 11,428$ 14.5% Approx. 15% above Watershed Manager

38 Watershed Manager -- 9,937$ -- Same as Project Manager#VALUE! #VALUE! ######

Print Date: 7/30/2015

73

Benchmark Classes set to Market Median, Base + CashSalary Range Table - Steps

Job Title 1 2 3 4 5 6Executive Counsel $169,175 $177,634 $186,516 $195,842 $205,634 $215,916Executive Manager of Engineering and Operations $153,796 $161,486 $169,560 $178,038 $186,940 $196,287Chief Financial Officer $150,030 $157,531 $165,408 $173,678 $182,362 $191,480Water Resource & Planning Manager $133,557 $140,235 $147,247 $154,609 $162,339 $170,456Administrative Services Manager $123,563 $129,741 $136,228 $143,039 $150,191 $157,701Program Manager $118,190 $124,100 $130,305 $136,820 $143,661 $150,844Principal Watershed Manager $118,190 $124,100 $130,305 $136,820 $143,661 $150,844Information & Technology Manager $108,781 $114,220 $119,931 $125,928 $132,224 $138,835Senior Project Manager $107,446 $112,818 $118,459 $124,382 $130,601 $137,131Senior Watershed Manager $107,446 $112,818 $118,459 $124,382 $130,601 $137,131Manager of Permitting & Pretreatment $99,989 $104,988 $110,237 $115,749 $121,536 $127,613Project Manager $93,431 $98,103 $103,008 $108,158 $113,566 $119,244Watershed Manager $93,431 $98,103 $103,008 $108,158 $113,566 $119,244GIS Project Manager $89,220 $93,681 $98,365 $103,283 $108,447 $113,869Senior Pretreatment Program Specialist $83,324 $87,490 $91,864 $96,457 $101,280 $106,344Senior Brine Line Pipeline Operator $79,356 $83,324 $87,490 $91,864 $96,457 $101,280GIS Analyst II/ Network Administrator $76,158 $79,966 $83,964 $88,162 $92,570 $97,198Pretreatment Program Specialist $75,748 $79,535 $83,512 $87,688 $92,072 $96,676Brine Line Pipeline Operator II $72,142 $75,749 $79,536 $83,513 $87,689 $92,073Accountant/Project Manager $71,050 $74,603 $78,333 $82,250 $86,363 $90,681Senior Project Specialist $61,959 $65,057 $68,310 $71,726 $75,312 $79,078Accountant $59,210 $62,170 $65,278 $68,542 $71,969 $75,567Brine Line Pipeline Operator I $57,713 $60,599 $63,629 $66,810 $70,150 $73,658Project Specialist II $56,328 $59,144 $62,101 $65,206 $68,466 $71,889Senior Accounting Technician $53,646 $56,328 $59,144 $62,101 $65,206 $68,466Senior Administrative Assistant $53,646 $56,328 $59,144 $62,101 $65,206 $68,466Project Specialist I $51,207 $53,767 $56,455 $59,278 $62,242 $65,354Accounting Technician II $48,768 $51,206 $53,766 $56,454 $59,277 $62,241Administrative Assistant II $48,768 $51,206 $53,766 $56,454 $59,277 $62,241Accounting Technician I $42,407 $44,527 $46,753 $49,091 $51,546 $54,123Administrative Assistant I $42,407 $44,527 $46,753 $49,091 $51,546 $54,123

74

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityCash Transaction Report

Month of June 2015

Below is a summary of cash transactions completed during the month in the Authority's checking account with Citizens Business Bank. Attached are summaries by major revenue and expense classifications.

Cash Receipts and Deposits to Account 1,226,953.35$

Net Investment Transfers 2,005,670.08

Cash Disbursements (3,298,313.20)

Net Change for Month (65,689.77)$

Balance at Beginning of Month 1,015,481.09

Balance at End of Month per General Ledger 949,791.32$

Collected Balance per Bank Statement 1,006,617.05$

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE RECONCILIATION

Accounts Payable Balance @ 05/31/15 1,965,184.99$

Invoices Received for June 2015 2,552,132.95 Invoices Paid by check/wire during June 2015 (see attached register) (3,048,566.04)

Accounts Payable Balance @ 06/30/15 1,468,751.90$ .

75

CASH RECEIPTS

Brine Line Operating Revenues 485,289.96$ LESJWA Admin Reimbursement 15,288.80 Grant Proceeds - Prop 84 68,942.04 Grant Proceeds - Prop 84 Pass-throughs 624,790.66 Other 32,641.89

Total Receipts and Deposits 1,226,953.35$

INVESTMENT TRANSFERS

Transfer of Funds:From (to) LAIF 2,000,000.00$ From (to) Grant Retention (USB) - From (to) CalTRUST (USB) - From (to) Legal Defense Fund - From (to) Investments 5,670.08

Total Investment Transfers 2,005,670.08$

CASH DISBURSEMENTS

By Check:Payroll -$ Operations 3,043,622.06

Total Checks Drawn 3,043,622.06$

By Cash Transfer:Payroll 173,592.33$ Payroll Taxes 74,344.43 Wire Transfer - US Bank Credit Card 4,943.98 Account Analysis Fee 68.28 Take Care (AFLAC) 1,742.12

Total Cash Transfers 254,691.14$

Total Cash Disbursements 3,298,313.20$

76

Category Check # Check Date Type Vendor Check Amount

Bank Fees WDL000003459 06/12/2015 WDL US Bank 68.28$ Bank Fees Total 68.28$

Benefits 1183 06/04/2015 CHK State Compensation Ins Fund 4,090.83$ Benefits 1196 06/12/2015 CHK ACWA/JPIA 35,058.93$ Benefits 1197 06/12/2015 CHK AFLAC 319.27$ Benefits 1199 06/12/2015 CHK Public Employees' Retirement Systems 18,547.71$ Benefits 1200 06/12/2015 CHK Cal PERS Long Term Care Program 104.77$ Benefits 1217 06/18/2015 CHK Public Employees' Retirement Systems 7,943.29$ Benefits 1223 06/26/2015 CHK ACWA/JPIA 400.00$ Benefits 1225 06/26/2015 CHK Public Employees' Retirement Systems 18,694.42$ Benefits 1226 06/26/2015 CHK Cal PERS Long Term Care Program 142.49$ Benefits 1233 06/26/2015 CHK WageWorks 72.00$ Benefits 1236 06/26/2015 CHK Mutual Of Omaha 2,206.05$ Benefits 1245 06/30/2015 CHK State Compensation Ins Fund 4,090.83$ Benefits EFT163 06/12/2015 CHK Vantagepoint Transfer Agents 6,673.50$ Benefits EFT170 06/12/2015 CHK Vantagepoint Transfer Agents 374.62$ Benefits EFT184 06/26/2015 CHK Vantagepoint Transfer Agents 6,703.08$ Benefits EFT198 06/26/2015 CHK Vantagepoint Transfer Agents 385.58$ Benefits WDL000003451 06/01/2015 WDL Takecare 10.00$ Benefits WDL000003456 06/09/2015 WDL Takecare 215.85$ Benefits WDL000003461 06/15/2015 WDL Takecare 20.00$ Benefits WDL000003471 06/19/2015 WDL Takecare 116.88$ Benefits WDL000003472 06/22/2015 WDL Takecare 729.06$ Benefits WDL000003476 06/25/2015 WDL Takecare 200.00$ Benefits WDL000003477 06/26/2015 WDL Takecare 330.00$ Benefits WDL000003482 06/30/2015 WDL Takecare 120.33$

Benefits Total 107,549.49$

Car Repair/Maint 1214 06/12/2015 CHK County of Riverside 725.46$ Car Repair/Maint 1220 06/18/2015 CHK County of Riverside 544.95$ Car Repair/Maint 1222 06/18/2015 CHK Riverside Transmission Center 504.32$

Car Repair/Maint Total 1,774.73$

Charge Card P026237 06/09/2015 WDL US Bank 4,943.98$ Charge Card Total 4,943.98$

Computers 1186 06/04/2015 CHK Aatrix Software, Inc. 399.95$ Computers EFT156 06/04/2015 CHK Integrated Systems Solutions 9,026.94$ Computers EFT193 06/26/2015 CHK Solver Inc. 4,153.50$

Computers Total 13,580.39$

Construction 1193 06/04/2015 CHK Vali Cooper & Associates, Inc 54,102.00$ Construction 1210 06/12/2015 CHK Dudek 67,055.04$ Construction 1235 06/26/2015 CHK Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians 2,910.00$ Construction EFT209 06/26/2015 CHK Charles King Company, Inc. 832,063.16$

Construction Total 956,130.20$

Consulting 1189 06/04/2015 CHK Accent Computer Solutions Inc 1,154.00$ Consulting 1209 06/12/2015 CHK Accent Computer Solutions Inc 137.50$ Consulting 1218 06/18/2015 CHK West Coast Advisors 13,500.00$ Consulting 1228 06/26/2015 CHK Wildermuth Environmental, Inc 4,331.25$ Consulting 1234 06/26/2015 CHK enfoTech 27,058.00$ Consulting 1237 06/26/2015 CHK Ralph Andersen & Associates 11,000.00$ Consulting 1239 06/26/2015 CHK Stetson Engineers, Inc. 892.56$ Consulting EFT171 06/12/2015 CHK Integrated Systems Solutions 82.50$ Consulting EFT187 06/26/2015 CHK Risk Sciences 4,280.81$

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityCheck Detail

June 2015

Page 1 of 4

77



June 2015

Consulting EFT197 06/26/2015 CHK CDM Smith, Inc. 17,552.02$ Consulting EFT200 06/26/2015 CHK Integrated Systems Solutions 66.00$ Consulting EFT203 06/26/2015 CHK Trussell Technologies, Inc. 9,154.82$ Consulting EFT204 06/26/2015 CHK Elizabeth Jane Skrzat 1,495.00$

Consulting Total 90,704.46$

Contract Services EFT149 06/04/2015 CHK Orange County Sanitation District 2,168.91$ Contract Services EFT188 06/26/2015 CHK Western Municipal Water District 7,212.24$

Contract Services Total 9,381.15$

Contributions 1231 06/26/2015 CHK BIA Baldy View Chapter 2,500.00$ Contributions Total 2,500.00$

Debt Services EFT185 06/26/2015 CHK Orange County Water District 356,250.00$ Debt Services Total 356,250.00$

Director EFT161 06/12/2015 CHK Philip Anthony 52.90$ Director EFT162 06/12/2015 CHK Eastern Municipal Water District 203.35$ Director EFT165 06/12/2015 CHK Western Municipal Water District 228.43$ Director EFT167 06/12/2015 CHK Ed Killgore 46.00$ Director EFT173 06/12/2015 CHK Jasmin Hall 59.80$ Director EFT175 06/12/2015 CHK Steven Copelan 40.25$ Director EFT181 06/26/2015 CHK Inland Empire Utilities Agency 376.80$ Director EFT182 06/26/2015 CHK Philip Anthony 52.00$ Director EFT183 06/26/2015 CHK Eastern Municipal Water District 406.70$ Director EFT189 06/26/2015 CHK Ed Killgore 92.00$ Director EFT205 06/26/2015 CHK Harish S Sidhu 46.00$ Director EFT206 06/26/2015 CHK Jasmin Hall 119.60$ Director EFT210 06/26/2015 CHK Steven Copelan 40.25$

Director Total 1,764.08$

Employee Reimbursement EFT150 06/04/2015 CHK Regina Patterson 98.92$ Employee Reimbursement EFT155 06/04/2015 CHK David Ruhl 193.21$ Employee Reimbursement EFT157 06/04/2015 CHK Dawna Munson 96.39$ Employee Reimbursement EFT158 06/04/2015 CHK Lucas Gilbert 21.85$ Employee Reimbursement EFT159 06/04/2015 CHK Michael Plasencia 9.02$ Employee Reimbursement EFT168 06/12/2015 CHK Celeste Cantu 708.51$ Employee Reimbursement EFT172 06/12/2015 CHK Carlos Quintero 59.00$ Employee Reimbursement EFT177 06/18/2015 CHK Mark Norton 125.00$ Employee Reimbursement EFT178 06/18/2015 CHK Ian Achimore 204.44$ Employee Reimbursement EFT180 06/26/2015 CHK Richard Whetsel 147.06$ Employee Reimbursement EFT186 06/26/2015 CHK Regina Patterson 26.45$ Employee Reimbursement EFT190 06/26/2015 CHK Marie Jauregui 125.00$ Employee Reimbursement EFT194 06/26/2015 CHK David Ruhl 125.00$ Employee Reimbursement EFT195 06/26/2015 CHK Celeste Cantu 33.00$ Employee Reimbursement EFT196 06/26/2015 CHK Sara Villa 91.49$ Employee Reimbursement EFT199 06/26/2015 CHK Karen Williams 69.96$ Employee Reimbursement EFT202 06/26/2015 CHK Alice Duecker 128.45$ Employee Reimbursement EFT207 06/26/2015 CHK Lucas Gilbert 125.00$ Employee Reimbursement EFT208 06/26/2015 CHK Michael Plasencia 142.50$

Employee Reimbursement Total 2,530.25$

Equipment Expensed 1192 06/04/2015 CHK RJ Safety 1,743.30$ Equipment Expensed Total 1,743.30$

Equipment Rented 1180 06/04/2015 CHK Konica Minolta Business Solutions 1,143.22$ Equipment Rented 1238 06/26/2015 CHK GreatAmerica Financial Services 1,442.54$ Equipment Rented 1241 06/30/2015 CHK Konica Minolta Business Solutions 1,143.22$ Equipment Rented 1242 06/30/2015 CHK Pitney Bowes Global Financial Services 353.17$

Page 2 of 4

78



June 2015

Equipment Rented Total 4,082.15$

Facility Repair/Maint 1184 06/04/2015 CHK Burrtec Waste Industries Inc 73.48$ Facility Repair/Maint 1188 06/04/2015 CHK TNT Elevator Inc 209.00$ Facility Repair/Maint 1190 06/04/2015 CHK Calvada Surveying Inc 15,804.00$ Facility Repair/Maint 1203 06/12/2015 CHK Xylem Dewatering Solutions Inc 246.24$ Facility Repair/Maint 1221 06/18/2015 CHK Wayne Perry Inc 8,867.00$ Facility Repair/Maint 1230 06/26/2015 CHK Innerline Engineering 8,326.25$ Facility Repair/Maint 1246 06/30/2015 CHK Unlimited Services Building Maint 3,015.00$ Facility Repair/Maint 1247 06/30/2015 CHK RKM Heating and Air Conditioning 500.00$ Facility Repair/Maint EFT152 06/04/2015 CHK Yeier Janitorial Service 1,120.00$ Facility Repair/Maint EFT154 06/04/2015 CHK Green Meadows Landscape 1,685.00$ Facility Repair/Maint EFT166 06/12/2015 CHK Western Exterminator Co. 97.00$ Facility Repair/Maint EFT179 06/18/2015 CHK Commercial Door Metal System 7,295.00$ Facility Repair/Maint EFT191 06/26/2015 CHK Haz Mat Trans, Inc. 4,194.04$ Facility Repair/Maint EFT192 06/26/2015 CHK Green Meadows Landscape 575.00$ Facility Repair/Maint EFT201 06/26/2015 CHK Hoffman Southwest Corporation 24,075.41$

Facility Repair/Maint Total 76,082.42$

Lab Costs 1185 06/04/2015 CHK E. S. Babcock & Sons, Inc. 3,446.00$ Lab Costs 1206 06/12/2015 CHK E. S. Babcock & Sons, Inc. 944.00$ Lab Costs 1219 06/18/2015 CHK E. S. Babcock & Sons, Inc. 973.00$ Lab Costs 1229 06/26/2015 CHK E. S. Babcock & Sons, Inc. 1,621.00$

Lab Costs Total 6,984.00$

Material & Supplies 1213 06/12/2015 CHK K&H Metals and Supplies 48.88$ Material & Supplies Total 48.88$

Meeting Expense EFT151 06/04/2015 CHK Water Education Foundation 65.00$ Meeting Expense Total 65.00$

Office Expense 1187 06/04/2015 CHK Printing Connection, Inc. 427.16$ Office Expense 1194 06/04/2015 CHK The Paper Depot 90.00$ Office Expense 1198 06/12/2015 CHK Konica Minolta Business Solutions 2,035.95$ Office Expense 1215 06/18/2015 CHK Aramark Corporation Refreshment Services 184.57$ Office Expense 1227 06/26/2015 CHK Staples Business Advantage 601.69$ Office Expense EFT164 06/12/2015 CHK Capital One Commercial- 7003 83.02$ Office Expense 1202 06/12/2015 CHK Imagetech 484.83$

Office Expense Total 3,907.22$

Offsite Storage EFT169 06/12/2015 CHK Iron Mountain 558.18$ Offsite Storage Total 558.18$

Payroll/Taxes WDL000003454 06/12/2015 WDL Direct Deposit 6/12/2015 64,935.61$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000003455 06/12/2015 WDL Direct Deposit 6/12/2015 3,746.61$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000003457 06/12/2015 WDL PR Tax - Federal 26,750.34$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000003458 06/12/2015 WDL PR Tax - State 5,439.16$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000003481 06/12/2015 WDL PR Tax - Federal 626.76$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000003462 06/18/2015 WDL Direct Deposit 6/18/2015 37,236.06$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000003463 06/18/2015 WDL PR Tax - Federal 8,030.64$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000003464 06/18/2015 WDL PR Tax - State 686.40$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000003469 06/26/2015 WDL Direct Deposit 6/26/2015 67,674.05$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000003473 06/26/2015 WDL PR Tax - Federal 26,771.49$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000003474 06/26/2015 WDL PR Tax - State 5,699.25$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000003475 06/26/2015 WDL PR Tax - State 340.39$

Payroll/Taxes Total 247,936.76$

Petty Cash 1243 06/30/2015 CHK Karen Williams, Custodian of Petty Cash 187.23$ Petty Cash Total 187.23$

Page 3 of 4

79



June 2015

Prepaid Insurance Expense 1208 06/12/2015 CHK Alliant Insurance Services 133,259.43$ Prepaid Insurance Expense Total 133,259.43$

Prop 84 1204 06/12/2015 CHK San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation Distric 5,037.85$ Prop 84 1205 06/12/2015 CHK Municipal Water District of Orange County 464,347.85$ Prop 84 1207 06/12/2015 CHK Lake Elsinore & San Jacinto Watersheds Authority 123,556.76$ Prop 84 EFT160 06/12/2015 CHK Inland Empire Utilities Agency 31,848.20$

Prop 84 Total 624,790.66$

Safety EFT153 06/04/2015 CHK Underground Service Alert 280.50$ Safety Total 280.50$

Shipping/Postage 1216 06/18/2015 CHK Federal Express 227.85$ Shipping/Postage Total 227.85$

Spill Costs 1191 06/04/2015 CHK United Rentals 460.19$ Spill Costs 1211 06/12/2015 CHK Republic Services 609.29$ Spill Costs 1230 06/26/2015 CHK Innerline Engineering 1,687.50$ Spill Costs 1232 06/26/2015 CHK Jericho Systems, Inc. 950.00$ Spill Costs EFT183 06/26/2015 CHK Eastern Municipal Water District 14,217.92$

Spill Costs Total 17,924.90$

Treatment Costs EFT176 06/18/2015 CHK Orange County Sanitation District 625,883.92$ Treatment Costs Total 625,883.92$

Utilities 1178 06/04/2015 CHK Riverside, City of 1,874.55$ Utilities 1179 06/04/2015 CHK Verizon Wireless 1,387.38$ Utilities 1181 06/04/2015 CHK AT&T 157.07$ Utilities 1182 06/04/2015 CHK Southern California Edison 30.17$ Utilities 1195 06/04/2015 CHK Verizon Wireless 310.05$ Utilities 1201 06/12/2015 CHK Southern California Edison 249.46$ Utilities 1212 06/12/2015 CHK Windstream 1,064.46$ Utilities 1224 06/26/2015 CHK AT&T 157.25$ Utilities 1240 06/30/2015 CHK Verizon Wireless 1,248.75$ Utilities 1244 06/30/2015 CHK Southern California Edison 29.83$ Utilities 1248 06/30/2015 CHK Verizon Wireless 302.70$ Utilities EFT174 06/12/2015 CHK IntelePeer Cloud Communications LLC 362.12$

Utilities Total 7,173.79$

Accounts Payable 3,298,313.20$

Checks 3,043,742.39$ Wire Transfers 4,943.98$

3,048,686.37$

Bank Fees 68.28$

Take Care 1,621.79$ Payroll 247,936.76$

249,558.55$

Total Disbursements June 2015 3,298,313.20$

Page 4 of 4

80

RemainingCheck # Check Date Task # Task Description Vendor Name Total Contract Check Amount Contract Amount Notes/Comments

1189 06/04/2015 ACS100-06 Support for Ongoing IT Projects Accent Computer Solutions Inc 27,000.00$ 152.00$ 1,963.00$ 1189 06/04/2015 ACS100-06 Support for Ongoing IT Projects Accent Computer Solutions Inc 27,000.00$ 1,002.00$ 1,963.00$ 1209 06/12/2015 ACS100-06 Support for Ongoing IT Projects Accent Computer Solutions Inc 27,000.00$ 137.50$ 1,963.00$

EFT197 06/26/2015 CDM384-13 Regional Monitoring Program CDM Smith, Inc. 49,750.00$ 5,900.00$ 9,151.17$ EFT197 06/26/2015 CDM384-12 MSAR TMDL Support CDM Smith, Inc. 198,895.00$ 11,652.02$ 37,288.78$

EFT204 06/26/2015 SKRZ392-03 EC PR Blog Support Elizabeth Jane Skrzat 34,452.00$ 1,495.00$ 14,854.51$

1234 06/26/2015 ENFO240-03 BL PT Program iPACS Data Management enfoTech 27,058.00$ 27,058.00$ -$

EFT171 06/12/2015 INSOL100-06 Great Plains Software Technical Support Integrated Systems Solutions 5,000.00$ 82.50$ 2,728.00$ EFT200 06/26/2015 INSOL100-06 Great Plains Software Technical Support Integrated Systems Solutions 5,000.00$ 66.00$ 2,728.00$

1237 06/26/2015 RAA100-01 Class and Comp Study Ralph Andersen & Associates 32,800.00$ 11,000.00$ 3,175.00$

EFT187 06/26/2015 RISK374-04 Support Basin Monitoring Program TF Risk Sciences 49,950.00$ 4,280.81$ 9,931.58$

1239 06/26/2015 STET100-01 Resilience-based Project Scoring Rubric Stetson Engineers, Inc. 29,900.00$ 892.56$ 8,145.18$

EFT203 06/26/2015 TRU240-11 Ongoing Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis Trussell Technologies, Inc. 33,488.00$ 9,154.82$ -$

1218 06/18/2015 TEGI10000-17 Legislative and Government Relations Consulting West Coast Advisors 115,000.00$ 13,500.00$ -$

1228 06/26/2015 WILD374-10 Basin Monitoring Program TF Support Wildermuth Environmental, Inc 10,400.00$ 4,331.25$ 1.00$

90,704.46$

June 2015

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityConsulting

81


82

COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 2015.61 DATE: August 4, 2015 TO: SAWPA Commission SUBJECT: Inter-Fund Borrowing – June 2015 PREPARED BY: Karen Williams, Chief Financial Officer RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission receive and file the informational report on short-term, cash-flow inter-fund borrowing. DISCUSSION On December 13, 2005, the Commission approved Resolution No. 452, Inter-Fund and Inter-Project Loan Policy. Staff was directed to bring back an accounting of the loans each month for review when the total exceeded $250,000 in aggregate. The following projects, with negative cash flow, are listed below with the amounts borrowed from SAWPA General Fund Reserves in June 2015. The total amount borrowed is over the aggregate $250,000 amount recommended in Resolution No. 452, Inter-Fund and Inter-Project Loan Policy. The Commission has requested that this item be brought back each month as an informational item when the loan amount is under the $250,000 aggregate amount. Fund Fund Name 05/31/15

Balance Loan

Receipts New

Charges 06/30/15 Balance

130 Proposition 84 Admin ($1,784.78) ($0.00) $2,716.32 $931.54 135 Proposition 84 Admin R2 95,967.39 (68,942.04) 4,442.07 31,467.42 140 Proposition 84 Admin R3 140,538.76 0.00 20,289.26 160,828.02 145 Proposition 84 Admin R4 18,120.06 0.00 21,842.54 39,962.60 477 LESJWA Administration 13,902.13 (15,288.80) 24,796.40 23,409.73 504 Prop 84 - Drought Projects 113,960.78 0.00 25,487.86 139,448.64 Total Funds Borrowed $380,704.34 ($84,230.84) $99,574.45 $396,047.95 General Fund Reserves Balance $2,297,404.61 Less Amount Borrowed (396,047.95) Balance of General Fund Reserves $1,901,356.66 The following table lists each fund that has a negative cash flow, the source of funding for the fund, how often the fund is billed, and the projected rate of payment for the fund.

NEGATIVE CASH-FLOW FUNDS

Fund No. Source of Funding Billing Frequency

Projected Payment Time

130,135,140, 145 – Proposition 84 Admin DWR – Prop 84 Grant Quarterly Up to 6 months 477 – LESJWA Admin Reimbursement from LESJWA Monthly 2 to 4 weeks 504 - Proposition 84 Drought Projects DWR – Prop 84 Grant Quarterly Up to 6 months

83

CM#2015.61 August 4, 2015 Page 2 Fund 130 The outstanding balance of the funds due from DWR is the mandatory 10% retention from each invoice billed. Retention funds will not be released until the Proposition 84 Round I contract is completed in 2017. Fund 135 We just received the signed contract for administration of Proposition 84 Round II grant funds. These funds will be billed quarterly and 10% will be withheld for retention. Fund 140 We have not received the contract for administration of Proposition 84 Round III grant funds, but can begin to charge the grant for costs incurred. Once the signed contract is received we will be able to bill each quarterly and 10% will be withheld for retention. Fund 145 We have not received the contract for administration of Proposition 84 Round 2015 grant funds, but can begin to charge the grant for costs incurred. Once the signed contract is received we will be able to bill each quarterly and 10% will be withheld for retention. Fund 477 Each month LESJWA is billed the cost for administering the JPA. Once the bill is received, LESJWA submits payment within two weeks. Fund 504 This fund is for the implementation of drought related projects which are administered through PA-22. The following graph shows projected inter-fund loan balances, total unrestricted General Fund Reserves available for loans, and projected cash net of loans through July 2015. The projected loan balance is expected to remain within the $250,000 aggregate limit through July 2015, and can be covered by General Fund Reserves without a major impact on cash flow.

- 500

1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000

Jul-1

4

Aug-

14

Sep-

14

Oct

-14

Nov

-14

Dec-

14

Jan-

15

Feb-

15

Mar

-15

Apr-

15

May

-15

Jun-

15

Thou

sand

s

Projected General Cash / Reserves Fund Balance

Unrestricted Reserve Funds Interfund Loans

$250,000 Projected Cash Net of Loans

84

CM#2015.61 August 4, 2015 Page 3 RESOURCE IMPACTS The funds borrowed from the General Fund Reserves will be paid back with interest when the funding is received. Interfund loans for grants are not charged interest unless the grant contracts specifically states interest is eligible for reimbursement. Budgeted expenditures from the General Fund and proposed borrowings are not expected to have an impact on the General Fund Reserves balance. CM 2015.61 Interfund Borrowing Jun'15

85


86

COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 2015.63 DATE: August 4, 2015 TO: SAWPA Commission SUBJECT: Performance Indicators and Financial Reporting – June 2015 PREPARED BY: Karen Williams, Chief Financial Officer RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission receive and file staff’s report. DISCUSSION The attached reports have been developed to keep the Commission informed as to SAWPA’s business and budget performance. These reports are categorized into the following groups: financial reporting, cash and investments, and performance indicators. They are explained in detail below. As new reports are developed, they will be added for the Commission’s review. Financial Reporting

Balance Sheet by Fund Type Lists total assets, liabilities, and equity by fund type for a given period.

Revenue & Expense by Fund Type Lists total revenue and expenses by fund type for a given period.

Receivables Management Shows total outstanding accounts receivable by age.

Open Task Order Schedule Shows SAWPA’s total outstanding obligation for open task orders.

Debt Service Funding Analysis Shows total annual income by source used to make debt service payments through debt maturity at FYE 2022.

Debt Service Payment Schedule Shows total debt service interest and principal payments through debt maturity at FYE 2022.

Cash and Investments

Total Cash and Investments (chart) Shows the changes in cash and investments for the fiscal year.

Reserve Balance & Source of Funds Shows total cash and investments for all SAWPA funds and the types of investments held for each fund.

Cash & Investments (pie chart) Shows total cash and investments for all SAWPA funds and the percentage of each investment type.

Reserve Account Analysis Shows changes to each reserve account for the year and projected ending balance for each.

Twelve Month Security Schedule (chart)

Shows the maturity dates for securities held and percentage of securities in each category.

Treasurer’s Report Shows book and market value for both Treasury strips and securities held by the Agency.

87

CM#2015.63 August 4, 2015 Page 2 Performance Indicators

Average Daily Flow by Month Shows total flow in the SARI System by month compared to total treatment capacity owned. This is an indicator of the available capacity in the line. As we add yearly flows, it will show trends in flow throughout the year.

Summary of Labor Multipliers Summarizes the information generated from the following two reports and compares the actual benefit and G&A Allocation rates to the total budgeted rates.

General Fund Costs Lists total Fund No. 100 costs to date and the amount of those costs recovered through the G&A Allocation and member contributions.

Benefit Summary Lists total employee benefit costs actual to budget and projects them through the end of the year. This report compares how the actual benefit rate compares to the budgeted rate.

Labor Hours Budget vs. Actual Shows total budgeted hours for each project and compares them to the actual hours charged to each.

RESOURCE IMPACTS Staff expects minimal impacts to SAWPA or its member agencies related to this effort. Attachments: 1. Balance Sheet by Fund Type 9. Reserve Account Analysis 2. Revenue & Expense by Fund Type 10. Twelve-Month Maturity Schedule - Securities 3. Accounts Receivable Aging Report 11. Treasurer’s Report 4. Open Task Order Schedule 12. Average Daily Flow by Month 5. Debt Service Funding Analysis 13. Summary of Labor Multipliers 6. Debt Service Payment Schedule 14. General Fund Costs 7. Total Cash and Investments (chart) 15. Benefits 8. Reserve Balance & Source of Funds 16. Labor Hours Budgeted vs. Actual CM 2015.63 Perform Indicators Jun'15

88

Capital

Projects

Grants/

Contracts Planning

Collaborative

Projects

SAWPA

General

Brine Line

Enterprise

Fund

Totals

Assets

Current Assets

Cash and Investments ($2,125,152.81) $240,489.39 $133,786.96 $1,724,162.75 $2,944,648.35 $53,327,199.71 $56,245,134.35

Accounts Receivable 31,136.95 130,161.35 0.00 0.00 23,173.90 1,471,017.87 1,655,490.07

Installment Notes Receivable 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,717,092.48 7,717,092.48

Interest Receivable 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68,771.49 68,771.49

Prepaids and Deposits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 388,263.55 46,731.96 434,995.51

Total Current Assets (2,094,015.86) 370,650.74 133,786.96 1,724,162.75 3,356,085.80 62,630,813.51 66,121,483.90

Fixed Assets

Property, Plant & Equipment

less accum depreciation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,240,513.48 69,554,079.69 70,794,593.17

Work In Process 3,719,661.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,719,661.02

Total fixed assets 3,719,661.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,240,513.48 69,554,079.69 74,514,254.19

Other Assets

Wastewater treatment/disposal

rights, net of amortization 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,295.00 31,857,178.28 31,864,473.28

Inventory - Mitigation Credits 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,920,560.00 0.00 0.00 1,920,560.00

Total Other Assets 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,920,560.00 7,295.00 31,857,178.28 33,785,033.28

Total Assets $1,625,645.16 $370,650.74 $133,786.96 $3,644,722.75 $4,603,894.28 $164,042,071.48 $174,420,771.37

Liabilities and Fund Equity

Current Liabilities

Accounts Payable/Accrued Expenses $1,050,697.84 $44,784.81 $104.75 $27,659.08 $535,351.55 $1,551,118.30 $3,209,716.33

Accrued Interest Payable 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 409,078.33 409,078.33

Customer Deposits 0.00 444,352.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 444,352.81

Noncurrent Liabilities

Long-term Debt 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,208,434.34 25,208,434.34

Deferred Revenue 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80,249,749.50 80,249,749.50

Total Liabilities 1,050,697.84 489,137.62 104.75 27,659.08 535,351.55 107,418,380.47 109,521,331.31

Fund Equity

Contributed Capital 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,920,507.03 20,920,507.03

Retained Earnings 616,306.29 49,919.25 (30,662.28) 3,600,557.84 3,577,046.29 37,862,295.01 45,675,462.40

Revenue Over/Under Expenditures (41,358.97) (168,406.13) 164,344.49 16,505.83 491,496.44 (2,159,111.03) (1,696,529.37)

Total Fund Equity 574,947.32 (118,486.88) 133,682.21 3,617,063.67 4,068,542.73 56,623,691.01 64,899,440.06

Total Liabilities & Fund Equity $1,625,645.16 $370,650.74 $133,786.96 $3,644,722.75 $4,603,894.28 $164,042,071.48 $174,420,771.37

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityBalance Sheet by Fund Type

For the Eleven Months Ending Sunday, May 31, 2015

89

CapitalProjects

Grants/Contracts Planning

CollaborativeProjects

SAWPAGeneral

Brine LineEnterprise

FundTotals

Operating RevenueDischarge Fees $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8,204,548.15 $8,204,548.15Grant Proceeds 0.00 2,056,017.48 (0.01) 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,056,017.47Financing Proceeds 0.00 174,588.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 174,588.35

Total Operating Revenue 0.00 2,230,605.83 (0.01) 0.00 0.00 8,204,548.15 10,435,153.97

Operating ExpensesLabor 9,276.95 194,682.02 162,696.96 55,750.93 1,219,986.63 747,560.29 2,389,953.78Benefits 4,258.12 86,689.66 74,677.92 25,589.61 423,472.03 343,130.16 957,817.50G&A Allocation 14,555.53 319,815.17 255,271.51 87,473.19 0.00 1,172,922.06 1,850,037.46Education & Training 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,548.04 302.50 14,850.54Consulting & Professional Services 44,308.73 21.03 45,127.77 304,693.21 209,132.47 120,560.54 723,843.75Operating Costs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,574.24 2,462,316.60 2,464,890.84Repair & Maintenance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49,887.81 547,235.36 597,123.17Phone & Utilities 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51,116.71 6,948.23 58,064.94Equipment & Computers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 177,927.16 19,930.21 197,857.37Meeting & Travel 96.59 435.64 6,410.62 446.47 20,118.96 5,146.08 32,654.36Other Administrative Costs 0.00 10,437.52 11,632.67 0.00 78,676.47 23,341.50 124,088.16Benefits Applied 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (12,452.80) 0.00 (12,452.80)G&A Applied 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (1,984,143.46) 0.00 (1,984,143.46)Other Expenses 0.00 0.00 0.00 185,764.10 30,288.16 210,831.65 426,883.91Construction 0.00 1,929,011.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,929,011.76

Total Operating Expenses 72,495.92 2,541,092.80 555,817.45 659,717.51 281,132.42 5,660,225.18 9,770,481.28

Operating Income (Loss) (72,495.92) (310,486.97) (555,817.46) (659,717.51) (281,132.42) 2,544,322.97 664,672.69

Nonoperating Income (Expense)Member Contributions 0.00 10,000.00 682,500.00 171,295.00 942,950.00 0.00 1,806,745.00Other Agency Contributions 0.00 0.00 0.00 496,735.00 0.00 0.00 496,735.00Interest Income 0.00 0.00 994.20 7,070.83 10,482.14 147,847.29 166,394.46Interest Expense - Debt Service 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (808,937.77) (808,937.77)Other Income 31,136.95 0.00 14,062.75 0.00 16,233.18 57,595.66 119,028.54Use of Reserves 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (118,506.14) 0.00 (118,506.14)Other Expense 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (8.00) 0.00 (8.00)Operating Transfers 0.00 0.00 22,605.00 0.00 (22,605.00) 0.00 0.00Gain/Loss on Disposal/Sale of Assets 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,122.51 0.00 0.00 1,122.51

Total Nonoperating Income (Expense) 31,136.95 10,000.00 720,161.95 676,223.34 828,546.18 (603,494.82) 1,662,573.60

Excess Rev over (under) Exp ($41,358.97) ($300,486.97) $164,344.49 $16,505.83 $547,413.76 $1,940,828.15 $2,327,246.29

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority

For the Eleven Months Ending Sunday, May 31, 2015

90

Aging ReportSanta Ana Watershed Project Authority

Receivables as of June 30, 2015

Customer Name Project Total Current 0-30 Days 31-60 Days 61 and Over

Chino Basin Desalter Authority Brine Line 276,919.26 134,197.39 142,721.87 Department of Water Resources Prop 84 945,843.64 228,920.16 - 18,579.35 698,344.13 Eastern Municipal Water District Brine Line 282,516.29 139,674.97 142,841.32 Inland Empire Utilities Agency Brine Line 236,259.21 116,811.84 119,447.37 Lake Elsinore San Jacinto Watersheds Authority Administration 24,771.67 24,771.67 Orange County Public Works Brine Line Construction 31,136.95 31,136.95 Orange County Water District Member Agency Contributions 23,000.00 23,000.00 San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District Brine Line 124,736.53 62,190.60 62,545.93 Western Municipal Water District Brine Line 819,618.83 273,442.26 272,665.56 273,511.01

Total Accounts Receivable 2,764,802.38 980,008.89 740,222.05 292,090.36 752,481.08

91

Task Order No. Vendor No. Vendor Name Task Description Begin Date End Date Original Contract Change Orders Total Contract Billed To Date Contract Balance SAWPA ManagerProject Contracts

PO2994 1699 A Cone Zone Traffic Control Instrument Rentals 10/17/2014 6/30/2015 1,000.00$ -$ 1,000.00$ 440.25$ 559.75$ Carlos Quintero

KEN504-301 2062 Ken Baerenklau Conservation Based Water Rates Support 4/21/2015 6/30/2016 25,000.00$ -$ 25,000.00$ 1,312.50$ 23,687.50$ Mark Norton

WO#2015-03 1872 Calvada Surveying Inc On-Call Survey Services 6/27/2014 6/30/2015 28,250.00$ -$ 28,250.00$ 27,618.00$ 632.00$ Carlos Quintero

CARO240-02 1508 Carollo Engineers 2014 Financial Planners Update 8/15/2014 12/31/2014 15,000.00$ -$ 15,000.00$ 4,227.75$ 10,772.25$ David Ruhl

CDM384-12 1575 CDM Smith MSAR TMDL Support 7/3/2013 12/31/2015 158,395.00$ 40,500.00$ 198,895.00$ 161,606.22$ 37,288.78$ Rick Whetsel

CDM384-13 1575 CDM Smith Regional Monitoring Program 12/9/2014 6/30/2015 49,750.00$ -$ 49,750.00$ 40,598.83$ 9,151.17$ Mark Norton

Construction 2053 Charles King Company Inc IEBL Reach V Rehabilitation & Improvement - Phase 1 10/31/2014 2/9/2016 12,561,316.00$ -$ 12,561,316.00$ 2,200,715.13$ 10,360,600.87$ David Ruhl

DUDK326-01 1969 Dudek BL Reach V Rehabilitation and Improvement 9/27/2013 6/30/2015 381,218.00$ 18,290.00$ 399,508.00$ 399,494.22$ 13.78$ David Ruhl

DUDK326-02 1969 Dudek Reach V Rehabilitation and Improvement Project 10/28/2014 6/30/2016 214,650.00$ -$ 214,650.00$ 121,478.93$ 93,171.07$ David Ruhl

WO#2015-04 1404 E S Babcock Inc Wastewater Sample Collection and Analysis 6/27/2014 6/30/2015 40,402.00$ 3,000.00$ 43,402.00$ 40,683.00$ 2,719.00$ Carlos Quintero

ENFO240-03 2002 enfo Tech Brine Line PT Program iPACS Data Management 6/20/2015 6/30/2016 27,058.00$ -$ 27,058.00$ 27,058.00$ -$ Carlos Quintero

EOA240-01 1999 EOA Inc (Eisenberg Olivieri & Associates) Remedial Plan Implementation 8/5/2013 3/30/2014 45,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 66,128.74$ 8,871.26$ Rich Haller

EOA240-02 1999 EOA Inc (Eisenberg Olivieri & Associates) Remedial Plan Implementation 11/17/2014 12/31/2014 5,100.00$ -$ 5,100.00$ 4,673.41$ 426.59$ Rich Haller

G&G240-13 1222 G & G Environmental Compliance Inc Brine Line System O & M- Permitting & Pretreatment Program 6/25/2012 6/30/2013 77,090.00$ -$ 77,090.00$ 39,132.93$ 37,957.07$ Rich Haller

WO#2015-05 1349 Haz Mat Trans Inc On-Call Line Cleaning Services 7/1/2014 6/30/2015 28,793.00$ -$ 28,793.00$ 14,947.19$ 13,845.81$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2015-06 1349 Haz Mat Trans Inc On-Call Line Draining and Emergency Clean Up Services 7/1/2014 6/30/2015 38,643.00$ -$ 38,643.00$ 7,577.25$ 31,065.75$ Carlos Quintero

HDR320-03-02 1280 HDR Engineering Inc Upper Reach IV-A 4/24/2013 6/30/2014 25,000.00$ -$ 25,000.00$ 15,372.38$ 9,627.62$ David Ruhl

WO#2015-08 1654 Hoffman Southwest Corporation On-Call CCTV Services 7/17/2014 6/30/2015 40,000.00$ -$ 40,000.00$ 24,601.57$ 15,398.43$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2015-52 1032 Inland Empire Utilities Agency 4A Upper Support 4/15/2015 6/30/2015 10,000.00$ -$ 10,000.00$ 3,871.00$ 6,129.00$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2015-01 1450 Innerline Engineering On-Call Cleaning Services 7/15/2014 6/30/2015 375,000.00$ -$ 375,000.00$ 370,967.72$ 4,032.28$ Carlos Quintero

JERI240-02 1596 Jericho Systems Inc Biological Impact - Baker Street SSO 10/27/2014 6/30/2015 5,850.00$ -$ 5,850.00$ 5,850.00$ -$ Carlos Quintero

JERI240-03 1596 Jericho Systems Inc Baker Street SSO 5/20/2015 6/30/2015 950.00$ -$ 950.00$ 950.00$ Carlos Quintero

K&SI320-03-03 1119 Krieger & Stewart Brine Line Protection Plan 2/28/2014 3/31/2015 10,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 40,000.00$ 31,136.95$ 8,863.05$ David Ruhl

WO#2015-07 1873 Natures Image Right of Way Maintenance 8/13/2014 6/30/2015 18,188.00$ -$ 18,188.00$ 13,374.00$ 4,814.00$ Carlos Quintero

N&M326-01 2071 Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical & Environmental Materials Testing - Reach V 6/4/2015 6/30/2016 50,000.00$ -$ 50,000.00$ -$ 50,000.00$ David Ruhl

WO#2015-25 2010 NPA Construction Reach 4A MAS Corrosion Protection 7/25/2014 12/13/2014 17,275.00$ -$ 17,275.00$ 12,567.00$ 4,708.00$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2015-53 1142 Orange County Water District Bacteroides Analysis 4/15/2015 6/30/2015 20,000.00$ -$ 20,000.00$ 13,650.00$ 6,350.00$ Rick Whetsel

PRB145-01 2008 Paul Redvers Brown Inc OWOW 2015 Round - Project Review Committee 6/10/2015 6/30/2015 2,000.00$ -$ 2,000.00$ -$ 2,000.00$ Mark Norton

WO#2015-51 2018 Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians Inland Empire Brine Line Reach V Capital - Tribal Monitoring 4/23/2015 6/30/2015 4,320.00$ -$ 4,320.00$ 3,870.00$ 450.00$ Davie Ruhl

RESO370-02-01 1297 Resource Strategies Inc LIDAR Pilot Project 12/12/2014 4/1/2015 45,210.00$ -$ 45,210.00$ 40,846.00$ 4,364.00$ Dean Unger

PO3045 1975 Republic Services/Colton Disposal Disposal Fee 1/27/2015 6/30/2015 3,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 3,896.97$ 4,103.03$ Carlos Quintero

RISK374-04 1174 Risk Sciences Support Basin Monitoring Program TF 10/16/2013 6/30/2015 49,950.00$ -$ 49,950.00$ 40,018.42$ 9,931.58$ Mark Norton

RISK384-07 1174 Risk Sciences MSAR TMDL Task Force 6/25/2013 6/30/2015 44,080.00$ -$ 44,080.00$ 38,778.40$ 5,301.60$ Rick Whetsel

SAWA323-01 1420 Santa Ana Watershed Association Habitat Mitigation in Prado Basin 1/29/2010 12/31/2016 245,000.00$ -$ 245,000.00$ 213,632.95$ 31,367.05$ Carlos Quintero

SAWA323-03 1420 Santa Ana Watershed Association Habitat Mitigation Upstream Prado Dam Lower Reaches IV-A & IV-B 3/27/2014 12/31/2017 77,506.04$ -$ 77,506.04$ -$ 77,506.04$ Carlos Quintero

SAWA387-04 1420 Santa Ana Watershed Association Plant Control & Biological Monitoring 6/28/2012 12/31/2015 165,000.00$ 108,780.00$ 273,780.00$ 244,834.67$ 28,945.33$ Ian Achimore

KSCH145-01 2073 Kurt Schwabe OWOW 2015 Round - Project Review Committee 6/16/2015 6/30/2015 2,000.00$ -$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ -$ Mark Norton

SKRZ392-03 1938 Elizabeth Jane Skrzat EC PR Blog Support 9/2/2014 6/30/2015 34,452.00$ -$ 34,452.00$ 19,597.49$ 14,854.51$ Mark Norton


As of June 2015Open Task Orders Schedule

92

Task Order No. Vendor No. Vendor Name Task Description Begin Date End Date Original Contract Change Orders Total Contract Billed To Date Contract Balance SAWPA ManagerProject Contracts


As of June 2015Open Task Orders Schedule

WO#2015-22 2006 Source Molecular MSAR TMDL Sample Analysis 7/15/2014 6/30/2015 15,000.00$ -$ 15,000.00$ 5,630.00$ 9,370.00$ Rick Whetsel

TKE240-01 1995 TKE Engineering & Planning Brine Line Pretreatment Program 5/29/2013 6/30/2014 25,000.00$ -$ 25,000.00$ 16,480.00$ 8,520.00$ Rich Haller

TKE240-02 1995 TKE Engineering & Planning Brine Line On-Call Land Surveying Services 6/26/2015 6/30/2017 30,300.00$ -$ 30,300.00$ -$ 30,300.00$ Carlos Quintero

PO3016 1974 Tripac Marketing Inc Bolts/Nuts, Gaskets 11/21/2014 6/30/2015 500.00$ -$ 500.00$ 485.26$ 14.74$ Carlos Quintero

PO3052 1974 Tripac Marketing Inc Bolts/Nuts, Gaskets 2/12/2015 6/30/2015 1,000.00$ -$ 1,000.00$ -$ 1,000.00$ Carlos Quintero

TROX145-01 2074 Wyatt Troxel OWOW 2015 Round - Project Review Committee 6/10/2015 6/30/2015 2,000.00$ -$ 2,000.00$ -$ 2,000.00$ Mark Norton

TRU240-10 1915 Trussell Technologies Inc Evaluation of New S01 Station Sampling System 7/14/2014 6/30/2015 17,655.00$ 15,000.00$ 32,655.00$ 32,655.00$ -$ Rich Haller

TRU240-11 1915 Trussell Technologies Inc Ongoing Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis 7/14/2014 6/30/2015 31,488.00$ 2,000.00$ 33,488.00$ 33,488.00$ -$ Rich Haller

TRU240-12 1915 Trussell Technologies Inc Evaluation of the DOC Level Limit 5/7/2015 9/30/2015 4,000.00$ -$ 4,000.00$ 1,568.00$ 2,432.00$ Rich Haller

TRU240-13 1915 Trussell Technologies Inc Water Quality Monitoring Analysis 6/12/2015 6/30/2016 43,395.00$ -$ 43,395.00$ -$ 43,395.00$ Rich Haller

TRU240-14 1915 Trussell Technologies Inc S01 Monitoring Point - Stinger-Probe Evaluation 6/12/2015 6/30/2016 25,016.00$ -$ 25,016.00$ -$ 25,016.00$ Rich Haller

VALI326-02 2034 Vali Cooper & Associates Inc Reach V Rehabilitation & Improvements - Construction Management 10/28/2014 6/30/2016 818,610.00$ -$ 818,610.00$ 280,204.50$ 538,405.50$ David Ruhl

PO3057 1771 United Storm Water Inc Dewatering Bins, Ramps, Hauling Services 2/25/2015 6/30/2015 6,000.00$ 4,055.00$ 10,055.00$ 8,412.36$ 1,642.64$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2015-30 1819 Wayne Perry Inc On-call Potholing Services 9/5/2014 6/30/2015 34,562.50$ -$ 34,562.50$ 5,796.00$ 28,766.50$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2015-47 1819 Wayne Perry Inc Reach V Potholing 3/17/2015 6/30/2015 11,580.00$ -$ 11,580.00$ 6,176.00$ 5,404.00$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2015-02 1217 Western Municipal Water District Brine Line Operations & Maintenance 6/30/2014 6/30/2015 241,381.00$ -$ 241,381.00$ 84,994.14$ 156,386.86$ David Ruhl

WILD374-10 1281 Wildermuth Environmental Inc Basin Monitoring Program TF Support 4/6/2015 6/30/2015 10,400.00$ -$ 10,400.00$ 10,399.00$ 1.00$ Mark Norton

Annual Support Contracts

ACS100-06 1842 Accent Computer Solutions Support for Ongoing IT Projects 7/31/2014 6/30/2015 27,000.00$ -$ 27,000.00$ 25,037.00$ 1,963.00$ Dean Unger

GOAL100-01 2046 Goal Productions Brine Line Video 11/14/2014 8/31/2015 19,776.00$ 6,276.00$ 26,052.00$ 26,051.25$ 0.75$ Dean Unger

GOAL100-02 2046 Goal Productions Conservation Based Water Rates Education Video 4/21/2015 6/30/2015 23,435.68$ -$ 23,435.68$ 11,732.84$ 11,702.84$ Mark Norton

INSOL100-06 1648 Integrated Systems Solutions GP Software- Technical Support 8/15/2014 6/30/2015 5,000.00$ -$ 5,000.00$ 2,272.00$ 2,728.00$ Dean Unger

KON100-02 1147 Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc OnBase System Support 9/23/2014 6/30/2015 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ -$ 10,000.00$ Dean Unger

RAA100-01 2047 Ralph Anderson & Associates Class and Comp Study 11/10/2014 6/30/2015 32,800.00$ -$ 32,800.00$ 29,625.00$ 3,175.00$ Karen Williams

PO2933 1544 County of Riverside Gas for Vehicles 6/26/2014 6/30/2015 3,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 10,521.94$ 1,478.06$ Carlos Quintero

PO3075 2067 County of Riverside/Transportation Diesel Fuel 4/16/2015 6/30/2015 1,000.00$ -$ 1,000.00$ 728.65$ 271.35$ Carlos Quintero

PO2968 2038 Riverside Transmission Center Agency Vehicle Maintenance - Oil Change, Air Filter 7/24/2014 6/30/2015 1,000.00$ 2,100.00$ 3,100.00$ 2,751.67$ 348.33$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2015-10 1890 Southern California Fleet Services Inc Agency Vehicle Maintenance 7/1/2014 6/30/2015 5,000.00$ -$ 5,000.00$ -$ 5,000.00$ Carlos Quintero

STET100-01 2052 Stetson Engineers Inc Resilience-based Project Scoring Rubric 2/12/2015 5/1/2015 29,900.00$ -$ 29,900.00$ 21,754.82$ 8,145.18$ Larry McKenney

WCD100-03 1674 Web Casa Design Website Update and Support 8/15/2014 6/1/2015 2,900.00$ 2,475.00$ 5,375.00$ 3,437.50$ 1,937.50$ Dean Unger

TDGI10000-17 1326 West Coast Advisors (Formerly The Dolphin Group) Legislative & Government Relations Consulting FY14-15 7/7/2014 6/30/2015 115,000.00$ -$ 115,000.00$ 115,000.00$ -$ Celeste Cantú

WNDE100-02 1449 White Nelson Diehl Evans LLC SAWPA Auditing Services 8/4/2014 6/30/2015 25,100.00$ -$ 25,100.00$ 23,100.00$ 2,000.00$ Karen Williams

11,797,615.17$

93

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityBrine Line Debt Service Funding Analysis

June 30, 2015

FYE T-Strip Capacity Rates Loan Pymts Interest Earned * Ending CashMaturity (a) Loan Receipts (b) © ( d ) (e) Excess Cash Balance

Beginning Balance 3,813,182 2014 2,449,000 795,772 998,000 (4,578,510) 76,264 (259,475) 3,553,707 2015 2,349,000 795,772 1,034,000 (4,461,810) 71,074 (211,964) 3,341,743 2016 1,824,000 795,772 1,034,000 (4,055,340) 66,835 (334,733) 3,007,010 2017 949,000 795,772 1,034,000 (3,060,725) 60,140 (221,812) 2,785,198 2018 949,000 795,772 1,034,000 (3,060,725) 55,704 (226,249) 2,558,949 2019 395,000 528,582 1,034,000 (2,526,801) 51,179 (518,040) 2,040,909 2020 395,000 - 1,034,000 (2,170,551) 40,818 (700,733) 1,340,177 2021 395,000 - 1,034,000 (2,170,551) 26,804 (714,747) 625,429 2022 395,000 - 1,034,000 (1,943,236) 12,509 (501,728) 123,702 2023 - - 1,034,000 (1,044,273) 2,474 (7,799) 115,903 2024 - - 1,034,000 (1,044,273) 2,318 (7,955) 107,947 2025 - - 1,034,000 (1,044,273) 2,159 (8,114) 99,833 2026 - - 1,034,000 (1,044,273) 1,997 (8,277) 91,557 2027 - - 1,034,000 (1,044,273) 1,831 (8,442) 83,114 2028 - - 1,034,000 (1,044,273) 1,662 (8,610) 74,504 2029 - - 1,034,000 (1,044,273) 1,490 (8,783) 65,721 2030 - - 1,034,000 (1,044,273) 1,314 (8,959) 56,762 2031 - - 1,034,000 (1,044,273) 1,135 (9,138) 47,624 2032 - - 1,034,000 (1,044,273) 952 (9,321) 38,303 2033 - - 1,034,000 (1,044,273) 766 (9,507) 28,796

10,100,000 4,507,442 20,644,000 (39,515,253) 479,425 (3,784,385) 28,796

*Interest earned is based on a conservative 2.00% average return over the period

94

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityDebt Service Payment Schedule

FY 2014 - 2033

RemainingFYE Interest Principal Total Payment Principal2014 917,806 3,660,704 4,578,510 29,125,074 2015 827,925 3,633,884 4,461,810 25,491,190 2016 716,452 3,338,888 4,055,340 22,152,302 2017 615,366 2,445,358 3,060,725 19,706,943 2018 539,727 2,520,997 3,060,725 17,185,946 2019 461,459 2,065,342 2,526,801 15,120,604 2020 395,403 1,775,147 2,170,551 13,345,456 2021 348,294 1,822,257 2,170,551 11,523,199 2022 299,932 1,643,304 1,943,236 9,879,895 2023 256,877 787,396 1,044,273 9,092,499 2024 236,405 807,868 1,044,273 8,284,631 2025 215,400 828,873 1,044,273 7,455,758 2026 193,850 850,424 1,044,273 6,605,335 2027 171,739 872,535 1,044,273 5,732,800 2028 149,052 895,220 1,044,273 4,837,580 2029 125,777 918,496 1,044,273 3,919,084 2030 101,896 942,377 1,044,273 2,976,707 2031 77,394 966,879 1,044,273 2,009,828 2032 52,256 992,018 1,044,273 1,017,810 2033 26,463 1,017,810 1,044,273 (0)

$0

$1

$2

$3

$4

$5

$6

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

2028

2029

2030

2031

2032

2033

Mill

ions

Debt Service Payment ScheduleFiscal Years 2014-2033

Principal

Interest

95

$59 $59$58 $59

$58

$57 $58$59

$58

$57$56

$54

$41

$46

$51

$56

$61

$66

$71

Jul'14 Aug'14 Sep'14 Oct'14 Nov'14 Dec'14 Jan'15 Feb'15 Mar'15 Apr'15 May'15 Jun'15

Millions

Total Cash & Investments

96

Checking CalTRUST LAIF Savings Investment Certificates Treasury Grant(Cash) Investments Account EPA Securities of Deposit Strips Retention

100 General Fund 1,901,357$ 950,291 - 951,066 - - - - - 1,901,357$ 100 Building Reserve 640,235$ - - 640,235 - - - - - 640,235$ 370 Basin Planning General 98,960$ - - 98,960 - - - - - 98,960$ 370 USBR Partnership Studies (44,738)$ - - (44,738) - - - - - (44,738)$ 387 Mitigation Bank Credits 998,191$ - - 998,191 - - - - - 998,191$ 240 Self Insurance Reserve 3,601,223$ - - 3,601,223 - - - - - 3,601,223$ 240 Brine Line Debt Retirement 7,649,051$ - - 3,223,985 - - - 4,425,066 - 7,649,051$ 240 Brine Line - Pipeline Replacement 21,541,933$ - 2,135,939 12,605,838 - 4,061,262 2,738,894 - - 21,541,933$ 240 Brine Line - OCSD Rehabilitation 6,419,245$ - - 6,419,245 - - - - - 6,419,245$ 240 Brine Line - Capacity Management 5,974,556$ - - 5,974,556 - - - - - 5,974,556$ 240 Brine Line - OCSD Future Capacity 1,703,740$ - - 1,703,740 - - - - - 1,703,740$ 240 Brine Line - Flow Imbalance Reserve 77,331$ - - 77,331 - - - - - 77,331$ 240 Brine Line - Operating Reserve 2,342,219$ - - 2,342,219 - - - - - 2,342,219$ 401 Legal Defense Fund 444,353$ - - - 444,353 - - - - 444,353$ 373 Watershed Management Plan 13,567$ - - 13,567 - - - - 13,567$ 372 Imported Water Recharge 30,554$ - - 30,554 - - - - - 30,554$ 374 Basin Monitoring Program TF 286,950$ - - 286,950 - - - - - 286,950$ 384 Middle SAR TMDL TF 92,434$ - - 92,434 - - - - - 92,434$ 386 Storm WQ Standards TF 92,552$ - - 92,552 - - - - - 92,552$ 381 SAR Fish Conservation 70,370$ - - 70,370 - - - - - 70,370$ 392 Emerging Constituents TF 141,760$ - - 141,760 - - - - - 141,760$ 500 Prop 13 - Grant Retention 44,760$ - - - - - - - 44,760 44,760$

54,120,602$ 950,291$ 2,135,939$ 39,320,037$ 444,353$ 4,061,262$ 2,738,894$ 4,425,066$ 44,760$ 54,120,602$

RESERVE BALANCE & SOURCE OF FUNDSJune 30, 2015

Reserve Accounts Cash and Investments

Total Total

97

T‐Strips, $4,425,066, 8%

Savings ‐ EPA, $444,353, 1%

LAIF, $39,320,037, 73%

Securities, $4,061,262, 7%Certificates of Deposit,

$2,738,894, 5%

CalTRUST Investments, $2,135,939, 4%

Grant Retention, $44,760, 0%

Checking Accounts, $950,291, 2%

Cash & Investments ‐ June 2015$54,120,602

98

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityReserve Account Analysis

June 30, 2015

Balance @ Interest Fund Loan/T-Strip Debt Service Inter-Fund Fund Balance @Reserve Account 6/30/2014 Earned Contributions Receipts Payments Loans Expenses 6/30/2015

Brine Line Operating Reserve 2,000,562 7,001 8,850,803 (8,516,148) 2,342,219 Flow Imbalance Reserve 69,132 299 7,900 77,331 OCSD Future Capacity 1,696,440 7,300 1,703,740 Capacity Management 4,472,847 21,242 1,480,467 5,974,556 Pipeline Replacement 24,252,200 93,542 420,424 (3,224,233) 21,541,933 OCSD Rehabilitation 5,400,890 18,355 1,000,000 6,419,245 Debt Retirement 3,489,522 14,501 1,034,000 3,144,772 (4,458,810) 3,223,985 Self Insurance 3,524,413 15,248 106,828 (45,266) 3,601,223 General Fund 1,708,063 7,732 1,025,165 (396,048) (443,556) 1,901,357 Building Reserve 611,132 2,828 68,602 (42,328) 640,235

46,325,606 188,048 13,994,190 3,144,772 (4,458,810) (396,048) (12,271,531) 47,425,823

99

-$100,000$100,000$300,000$500,000$700,000$900,000

$1,100,000$1,300,000$1,500,000$1,700,000$1,900,000$2,100,000$2,300,000$2,500,000

< 1 YR 1 to 2 YRS 2 to 3 YRS 3 to 4 YRS 4 to 5 YRS

Twelve Month Maturity ScheduleSecurities

26%

33%

22%19%

100

SAWPATREASURER'S REPORT

As of June 2015

Investment T-Strips Safekeeping CBB

Purchase Maturity Initial Current Book Market Interest

T-STRIPS Debt Date Date PAR Cost Discount Discount Value Value RateBAIS SARI 04/13/1995 11/15/2015 875,000.00 187,643.75 687,356.25 112,704.19 762,295.81 874,731.38 7.62%

USB WEST RIV 07/09/1999 11/15/2017 1,002,000.00 340,460.00 661,540.44 166,671.26 835,328.74 993,426.55 6.33%

USB WEST RIV 07/12/1999 05/15/2018 660,000.00 216,289.00 443,711.40 121,088.27 538,911.73 651,030.38 6.36%

USB TVRI 02/11/2000 05/15/2020 1,975,000.00 625,525.95 1,349,474.05 431,935.49 1,543,064.51 1,905,877.78 6.42%

4,512,000.00$ 1,369,918.70$ 3,142,082.14$ 832,399.21$ 3,679,600.79 4,425,066.09$ 6.68%

Investment Commercial Safekeeping US Bank

Purchase Maturity Unit Current Market Interest

Type Security Date Date Cost Cost Principal Value Value RateAgency FHLMC 3/27/2014 3/27/2019 109.33 546,650.00$ 500,000.00$ 500,000.00$ 543,403.50 3.75%Agency FHLMC 6/10/2014 3/8/2017 100.69 1,006,919.00$ 1,000,000.00$ 1,000,000.00$ 1,006,217.00 1.00%Agency FHLB 5/26/2015 6/14/2019 100.80 504,015.00$ 500,000.00$ 500,000.00$ 503,031.00 1.63%Agency FNMA 3/27/2014 2/19/2019 100.40 501,975.00$ 500,000.00$ 500,000.00$ 509,646.50 1.88%Agengy FNMA 3/27/2013 3/27/2018 100.00 1,000,000.00$ 1,000,000.00$ 1,000,000.00$ 998,261.00 1.00%Agency USTN 1/26/2011 7/31/2015 99.84 499,218.75$ 500,000.00$ 500,000.00$ 500,703.00 1.75%CD Discover 3/6/2013 3/6/2017 100.00 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 250,000.00 0.95%CD Goldman Sachs 3/6/2013 3/7/2016 100.00 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 251,047.56 0.75%CD American Express 3/7/2013 3/7/2016 100.00 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 251,051.52 0.75%CD Ally Bank 4/17/2013 4/18/2016 100.00 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 250,794.83 0.65%CD CIT Bank 3/13/2013 3/13/2018 100.00 248,000.00$ 248,000.00$ 248,000.00$ 248,000.00 1.10%CD BMW Bank 3/8/2013 3/8/2017 100.00 248,000.00$ 248,000.00$ 248,000.00$ 248,000.00 0.85%CD GE Capital Bank 1/31/2014 1/31/2017 100.00 248,000.00$ 248,000.00$ 248,000.00$ 248,000.00 1.00%CD GE Capital Retail 1/31/2014 1/31/2018 100.00 248,000.00$ 248,000.00$ 248,000.00$ 248,000.00 1.45%CD Capital Bank FL 5/27/2015 5/29/2018 100.00 248,000.00$ 248,000.00$ 248,000.00$ 248,000.00 1.10%CD Compass Bank 5/29/2015 8/29/2017 100.00 248,000.00$ 248,000.00$ 248,000.00$ 248,000.00 1.00%CD National Bank of NY 6/18/2014 6/18/2018 100.00 248,000.00$ 248,000.00$ 248,000.00$ 248,000.00 1.30%

6,794,777.75$ 6,736,000.00$ 6,736,000.00$ 6,800,155.91 1.29%

101

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityTreasurer's ReportAs of June 30, 2015

Investment T-Strips Issuer U.S.Gov't Banker USB Source of MV US Bank

Debt Service WEST RIV.

Months to Initial Current Book Market InterestPurchase Date Maturity Date Maturity PAR Cost Discount Discount Value Value Rate

07/09/1999 11/15/2015 6 334,000.00 120,627.00 213,372.56 44,153.43 289,846.57 333,897.46 6.33%07/09/1999 11/15/2016 18 334,000.00 113,340.00 220,660.44 55,765.57 278,234.43 331,864.74 6.33%07/09/1999 11/15/2017 30 334,000.00 106,493.00 227,507.44 66,752.26 267,247.74 327,664.35 6.33%

1,002,000.00$ 340,460.00$ 661,540.44$ 166,671.26$ 835,328.74$ 993,426.55$ 6.33%


Debt Service WEST RIV.


07/12/1999 05/15/2016 12 220,000.00 76,655.00 143,345.40 33,040.29 186,959.71 219,444.72 6.36%07/12/1999 05/15/2017 24 220,000.00 72,002.00 147,998.40 40,491.20 179,508.80 217,676.80 6.36%07/12/1999 05/15/2018 36 220,000.00 67,632.00 152,367.60 47,556.78 172,443.22 213,908.86 6.36%

660,000.00$ 216,289.00$ 443,711.40$ 121,088.27$ 538,911.73 651,030.38$ 6.36%

TOTAL 1,662,000.00$ 556,749.00$ 1,105,251.84$ 287,759.53$ 1,374,240.47$ 1,644,456.93$

102

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityTreasurer's ReportAs of June 30, 2015


Debt Service BL BIAS


04/13/1995 11/15/2015 6 875,000.00 187,643.75 687,356.25 112,704.19 762,295.81 874,731.38 7.62%875,000.00$ 187,643.75$ 687,356.25$ 112,704.19$ 762,295.81$ 874,731.38$

7.62%

Investment T-Strips Issuer U.S.Gov't Banker USB Source of MV US Bank Debt Service TVRI


02/11/2000 05/15/2016 12 395,000.00 140,169.70 254,830.30 60,853.72 334,146.28 394,003.02 6.48%02/11/2000 05/15/2017 24 395,000.00 132,178.85 262,821.15 74,347.15 320,652.85 390,828.80 6.45%02/11/2001 05/15/2018 36 395,000.00 124,500.05 270,499.95 87,137.65 307,862.35 384,063.64 6.43%02/11/2002 05/15/2019 48 395,000.00 117,646.80 277,353.20 99,102.60 295,897.40 374,306.35 6.39%02/11/2000 05/15/2020 60 395,000.00 111,030.55 283,969.45 110,494.37 284,505.63 362,675.97 6.36%

1,975,000.00$ 625,525.95$ 1,349,474.05$ 431,935.49$ 1,543,064.51$ 1,905,877.78$ 6.42%

103

02468

101214161820

Average Daily Flow by Month

Actual

Owned

104

SUMMARY OFLABOR MULTIPLIERS

Benefit Rate

Total Employee Benefits 1,107,957 0.419Total Payroll 2,642,113

Gross G&A Costs 2,702,147Less: Member Contributions & Other Revenue (680,000)G&A Costs for Distribution 2,022,147

G&A Rate

Direct Labor 1,352,434 1.495G&A Costs 2,022,147

FY 2014-15 Labor multiplier - thru 6/30/15 1.915

FY 2013-14 Labor multiplier 2.105





105

Actual thru Actual thruG/L Acct. Description 6/30/15 G/L Acct. Description 6/30/15

51000 Salaries - Regular 1,289,679$ 60171 Equipment Rented 53,142$ 52000 Benefits 591,666$ 60172 Equipment Repair / Maintenance 83$ 60111 Tuition Reimbursement -$ 60180 Computer Hardware 19,162$ 60112 Training 2,066$ 60181 Software / Updates / Licensing 84,444$ 60113 Education -$ 60182 Internet Services 14,173$ 60114 Other Training & Education 12,872$ 60183 Computer Supplies 3,877$ 60120 Audit Fees 23,100$ 60184 Computer Repair / Maintenance 178$ 60121 Consulting 89,521$ 60190 Offsite Meeting / Travel Expense 6,435$ 60126 Temporary Services -$ 60191 In House Meetings 1,639$ 60128 Other Professional Services 850$ 60192 Conference Expense 12,141$ 60129 Other Contract Services -$ 60193 Car, Repair, Maint 35$ 60130 Legal Fees -$ 60200 Dues 27,843$ 60133 Employment Recruitment -$ 60202 Subscriptions 807$ 60153 Materials & Supplies 1$ 60203 Contributions 17,500$ 60154 Safety 2,574$ 60210 Bank Charges 1,095$ 60155 Security 1,354$ 60211 Shipping / Postage 3,407$ 60156 Custodial Contract Services 21,833$ 60212 Office Supplies 9,662$ 60157 Landscaping Maintenance 14,640$ 60213 Offsite Storage 3,404$ 60158 HVAC 1,505$ 60220 Commission Fees 9,967$ 60159 Facility Repair & Maintenance 16,560$ 60221 Commission Mileage Reimb. 3,831$ 60160 Telephone 15,692$ 60222 Other Commission Expense 1,535$ 60161 Cellular / Paging Services 13,358$ 60230 Other Expense 4,065$ 60163 Electricity 21,065$ 80000 Retiree Medical Expense 118,506$ 60164 Water Services 4,527$ 80001 Insurance Expense 33,241$ 60170 Equipment Expensed 13,196$ 80000 Building Repair/Replacement Reserve 65,000$

13005 Fixed Assets 70,914$

Total Costs 2,702,147$

Direct Costs Paid by Projects 2,339,420$ Member Contribution Offset 680,000$ 3,019,420$

Over allocation % 15.7%

(Continued - next column)

GENERAL FUND COSTS( to be Distributed)

106

Actual @G/L Acct Description Budget 6/30/15

70101 FICA Expense 156,735 141,006$ 70102 Medicare Expense 42,607 38,618$ 70103 State Unemployment Insurance 6,860 6,818$ 70104 Worker's Compensation Insurance 67,425 46,031$ 70105 State Disability Insurance 26,907 19,410$ 70106 PERS Pension Plan 568,521 454,792$ 70111 Medical Expense 353,616 316,460$ 70112 Dental Expense 31,746 24,974$ 70113 Vision Insurance 6,348 6,483$ 70114 Life Insurance Expense 15,754 10,596$ 70115 Long Term Disability 24,281 12,605$ 70116 Wellness Program Expense 3,000 2,564$ 70120 Car Allowance 30,000 27,600$

Total Benefits 1,333,800 1,107,957 Total Payroll 2,908,720 2,642,113$ Benefits Rate 45.9% 41.9%

BENEFITS SUMMARY(Distributed based on Actual Labor)

107

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityLabor Hours Budget vs ActualMonth Ending June 30, 2015

Fund Budget Actual %

100 General & Administrative 25,572 23,418 91.58%125 Prop 50 Administration - 32 100.00%130 Prop 84 Administration 1,342 411 30.64%135 Prop 84 Round 2 Administration - 686 100.00%140 Prop 84 Drought Administration - 818 100.00%145 Prop 84 Final Round - 225 100.00%240 Brine Line Enterprise 17,288 18,234 105.47%320 Brine Line Protection 520 152 29.13%326 Reach V Capital Repairs 775 1,578 203.55%

370-01 General Basin Planning 1,990 2,804 140.91%370-02* USBR Partnership Studies 105 301 286.43%

372 Imported Water Recharge 130 38 29.23%373 Watershed Management Plan 2,160 1,065 49.31%374 Basin Monitoring Program 753 757 100.56%381 SAR Fish Conservation 195 173 88.85%

384-01 Chino TMDL Facilitation 200 237 118.63%386 Storm Water Quality Standards TF 230 68 29.57%387 Arundo Removal & Habitat Restoration 365 120 32.78%392 Emerging Constituents 595 170 28.57%395 UCI Research Grant - - 100.00%396 Forest First 180 - 0.00%

477TMDL LESJWA - TMDL Task Force 820 773 94.21%477-02 LESJWA - Administration 540 601 111.24%504-301 PA22 Implementation Administration - 978 100.00%

53,760 53,637 99.77%

Note: Should be at 100% of budget for 12 months* Grant received to cover additional labor hours

108

Sum of Amount Expn TypeStaff Posting Date Activity Hotel Meals Mileage Misc Parking Parking Registration Grand Total

Alice Duecker 06/22/2015 Mail Certified Letter - USPS 5/1/15 3.45 3.45Alice Duecker Total 3.45 3.45

Carlos Quintero 04/30/2015 CWEA Conference San Diego - Bread & Cie 4/29/15 9.67 9.67CWEA Conference San Diego - Bread & Cie 4/30/15 9.67 9.67CWEA Conference San Diego - Bread & Cie 5/115 9.67 9.67CWEA Conference San Diego - Convoy Tofu 4/29/15 9.95 9.95CWEA Conference San Diego - Peet's Coffee & Tea 4/29/15 2.25 2.25CWEA Conference San Diego - Peet's Coffee & Tea 4/30/15 2.25 2.25CWEA Conference San Diego - Rubios 4/29/15 8.63 8.63CWEA Conference San Diego - Town & Country 4/30/15 319.76 12.00 331.76CWEA Conference San Diego 4/29/15 74.75 74.75Reach IVA Site Visit 4/15/16 17.25 17.25

Carlos Quintero Total 319.76 52.09 92.00 12.00 475.85David Ruhl 04/30/2015 Facility Locating - Vali Cooper 4/20/15 14.95 14.95

Field Visit - Reach V Project 4/14/15 16.68 16.68Field Visit - Reach V Project 4/30/15 13.23 13.23Reach V Rehab Weekly Meeting - Vali Cooper 4/1/15 14.95 14.95Reach V Rehab Weekly Meeting - Vali Cooper 4/15/15 14.95 14.95Reach V Rehab Weekly Meeting - Vali Cooper 4/22/15 13.80 13.80Reach V Rehab Weekly Meeting - Vali Cooper 4/29/15 58.65 58.65

05/31/2015 Brine Line Shutdown (2x) - Reach V 5/15/15 28.75 28.75Brine Line Shutdown 2:00pm-5:00am - Reach V 5/14/15 10.35 10.35Brine Line Shutdown 6:00am-8:30am - Reach V 5/14/15 10.35 10.35Final Shutdown Coordination Mtg - Reach V/Corona 5/11/15 14.95 14.95Follow-up Shutdown Coordination Mtg - Reach V/Corona 5/4/15 14.95 14.95Reach V Field Visit - Reach V 5/21/15 12.65 12.65Reach V Field Visit - Reach V 5/29/15 12.65 12.65Reach V Shutdown (2x) Meeting - Reach V 5/12/15 27.60 27.60Weekly Progress Meeting - Reach V/Corona 5/13/15 17.25 17.25Weekly Progress Meeting - Reach V/Corona 5/20/15 14.38 14.38Weekly Progress Meeting - Reach V/Corona 5/27/15 14.38 14.38Weekly Progress Meeting - Reach V/Corona 5/6/15 14.95 14.95

06/30/2015 2-41 SARI Relocation/Protection Mtg - OCSD 6/22/15 43.70 43.70ACEC Awards Luncheon - Newport Beach 6/23/15 40.25 40.25ACEC Awards Luncheon, Toll - Newport Beach 6/23/15 2.25 2.25SAWPA Use of TVP Line - EVMWD 6/18/15 28.18 28.18Weekly Construction Meeting - Reach V 6/23/15 14.38 14.38Weekly Progress Meeting - Reach V/Corona 6/17/15 14.38 14.38Weekly Progress Meeting - Reach V/Corona 6/3/15 14.38 14.38Weekly Progress Meeting - Reach V/Corona 6/9/15 14.38 14.38

David Ruhl Total 510.07 2.25 512.32Dawna Munson 05/31/2015 LESJWA Board Meeting - EVMWD 4/16/15 24.73 24.73

Mail Certified Enforcement Letters - USPS 5/12/15 4.03 4.03Pick Up Commission Meeting Items - Sam's 4/20/15 1.73 1.73Pick Up Steering Committee Lunch - Farmer Boys 4/9/15 1.73 1.73Pick Up Steering Committee Lunch - Farmer Boys 5/28/15 1.73 1.73

07/01/2015 LESJWA Board Meeting - EVMWD 6/18/15 28.75 28.75Dawna Munson Total 62.70 62.70

Dean Unger 03/31/2015 Meeting with Doug Mende - Riverside Thai 3/11/15 24.87 24.87

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityStaff - Expense Report4th Quarter FYE 2015

109

Dean Unger 05/31/2015 IT Staff Farewell, Sam - Ancho's 5/20/15 79.85 79.85Dean Unger Total 104.72 104.72

Ian Achimore 06/17/2015 Arundo Habitat Project Site Meeting - Hidden Valley 4/15/15 8.05 8.05Arundo Habitat Project Site Meeting - Hidden Valley 6/3/15 8.05 8.05WEF Annual Conference - Ontario Airport 3/25/15 18.00 18.00WEF Annual Conference (to airport) 3/25/15 24.16 24.16WEF Water Leaders, MWD - Metrolink 4/14/15 22.00 22.00

Ian Achimore Total 40.26 22.00 18.00 80.26Karen Williams 02/28/2015 CFO Utility Quarterly Meeting , MOWDOC 91 Express 2/9/15 5.45 5.45

03/31/2015 CSFMO Lunch Meeting 3/10/15 30.00 30.0004/30/2015 CFO Budget Workshop - Mimi's Café 3/26/15 79.60 79.6006/22/2015 Budget Approval Meeting Toll - OCWD 6/3/15 5.70 5.7007/01/2015 Meeting with Valencia, IEUA, CFO - Roadhouse Grill 6/12/15 21.71 21.71

Karen Williams Total 131.31 11.15 142.46Kelly Berry 06/30/2015 Easement Recording - Riverside Recorder 5/26/15 20.13 20.13

Pick Up Office Plants - Lowes 6/23/15 3.45 3.45Research Easement Recording - Riverside Recorder 5/15/15 20.13 20.13

07/01/2015 Meeting - Greater Riverside Employer Advisory 6/10/15 30.00 30.00Kelly Berry Total 43.71 30.00 73.71

Lauren Churchman 04/30/2015 Earth Night - WMWD Gardens 4/22/15 13.86 13.86Lauren Churchman Total 13.86 13.86

Lucas Gilbert 04/20/2015 OCSD Coordination Meeting - El Torito 4/6/15 56.00 56.0005/31/2015 GWRS Subcommittee Tour & Meeting - OCWD 5/12/15 21.85 21.85

Lucas Gilbert Total 56.00 21.85 77.85Mark Norton 05/31/2015 IRWM 2.0 Conference - IEWM 4/28/15 195.00 195.00

Orange County Water Summit - OCWD 5/2/15 120.00 120.0007/01/2015 Sustainability Tour - ASCE 6/23/15 30.00 30.00

Mark Norton Total 30.00 315.00 345.00Michael Plasencia 04/30/2015 CWEA Conference - Ace Parking 4/30/15 6.00 6.00

CWEA Conference Registration - Plasencia 4/14/15 315.00 315.00Rayne Inspection 4/7/15 28.75 28.75

05/31/2015 Pick Up Goods for O&M Day - Staters 5/21/15 1.73 1.7306/23/2015 Inspections - SBVMWD/YVWD 6/2/15 42.55 42.55

Michael Plasencia Total 73.03 6.00 315.00 394.03Regina Patterson 04/30/2015 AMRA SCIE Meeting, Patterson 4/16/15 20.00 20.00

Duplicate Keys/Item - Home Depot/Ken's Lock/Vons 4/27/15 6.33 6.33Earth Night - WMWD Gardens 4/22/15 20.70 20.70Earth Night Meeting - WMWD 4/21/15 20.70 20.70Grant Easement - Riverside County Recorder 4/14/15 20.13 20.13Pick Up Earth Night Goods - Smart & Final 4/21/15 0.58 0.58Pick Up O&M Work Bleach - Vons 4/23/15 2.30 2.30Pick Up O&M Work Gloves - Costco 4/21/15 2.30 2.30SCIE ARMA Meeting - Chino Hills 5/15/15 26.45 26.45

05/31/2015 2015 Ford 550 Exempt Issue - Norco DMV 5/14/15 9.20 9.20Contaminated Dirt Load Payment - Republic Services 5/26/15 22.43 22.43Mail Certified Permits - USPS 5/12/15 3.45 3.45Pick Up O&M Day Items - Awards & Specialties 5/15/15 1.15 1.15Pick Up O&M Day Items - Harbor Freight/Home Depot 5/15/15 10.35 10.35Pick Up O&M Day Items - Michaels 5/18/15 3.45 3.45Pick Up O&M Day Items - Smart & Final 5/20/15 4.03 4.03Pick Up Poly Sheeting - Home Depot 5/13/15 4.03 4.03Pick Up Sika Sealers - White Cap 5/13/15 21.28 21.28SCIE ARMA Chapter RIM Seminar, Unger 5/7/15 80.00 80.00SCIE ARMA RIM Seminar - IEUA 5/6/15 19.55 19.55

06/22/2015 SCIE ARMA Chapter Meeting - Chino Hills 6/17/15 26.45 26.4507/01/2015 ARMA Monthly Chapter Meeting, Patterson 6/11/15 20.00 20.00

Negotiate Software Acquisitions Meeting, Unger - ARMA 6/8/15 30.00 30.00Regina Patterson Total 224.86 150.00 374.86

Rich Haller 03/31/2015 CWEA 2015 Conference, Haller Registration 3/24/15 475.00 475.00CWEA 2015 Conference, Quintero Registration 3/24/15 275.00 275.00

05/31/2015 CWEA Conference - Town & Country 5/1/15 380.56 380.56

110

Rich Haller 07/01/2015 Staff Farewell Lunch, Gemma - Chilitos 6/22/15 21.46 21.46Rich Haller Total 380.56 21.46 750.00 1152.02

Richard Whetsel 12/31/2014 Basin Tech Advisory Committee - SBVMWD 10/6/14 11.20 11.20Basin Tech Advisory Committee - SBVMWD 11/3/14 11.20 11.20Basin Tech Advisory Committee - SBVMWD 12/1/14 11.20 11.20Basin Tech Advisory Committee - SBVMWD 7/7/14 11.20 11.20Basin Tech Advisory Committee - SBVMWD 9/8/14 11.20 11.20Canyon Lake Alum Project Site Visit - Canyon Lake 9/24/14 39.20 39.20LE Aeration/Destratification O&M Meeting - EVMWD 11/19/15 28.00 28.00LE/CL TMDL Task Force - EVMWD 10/7/14 28.00 28.00LE/CL TMDL Task Force - EVMWD 11/18/14 28.00 28.00MSAR Pathogen TMDL Task Force - RCFE & WCD 10/7/14 14.56 14.56San Bernardino County Water Conference - CSUSB 8/22/14 29.68 29.68SAWPA 2014 Conference - Riverside Convention Ctr 10/14/14 12.32 8.00 20.32SBVWCD Facility Tour 10/21/14 25.76 25.76

03/31/2015 LE Aeration/Destratification O&M Meeting - EVMWD 1/14/15 28.75 28.75LE Future Projects Meeting - City of Lake Elsinore 3/24/15 29.90 29.90LE/CL TMDL Task Force - EVMWD 1/13/15 28.75 28.75Watershed Mgmt Model Demo - WMWD 2/23/15 21.85 21.85

06/24/2015 Basin Tech Advisory Committee - SBVMWD 5/4/15 21.85 21.85Basin Tech Advisory Committee - SBVMWD 6/16/15 21.85 21.85MSAR Pathogen TMDL Task Force - RCFC/WCD 6/16/15 16.10 16.10SARDA Meeting - IEUA 5/21/15 18.40 18.40

Richard Whetsel Total 448.97 8.00 456.97Sara Villa 06/25/2015 Earth Night - WMWD Gardens 4/22/15 17.83 17.83

Mail Certified Compliance/Enforcement - USPS 3/12/15 4.03 4.03Mail Certified Enforcement - USPS 3/17/15 4.03 4.03Mail Certified Enforcement - USPS 3/23/15 4.03 4.03Mail Certified Enforcement Letters - USPS 2/10/15 4.03 4.03Mail Certified Enforcement Letters - USPS 2/20/15 4.03 4.03Mail Certified Permit - USPS 2/26/15 4.03 4.03Mail Certified Permit - USPS 2/9/15 4.03 4.03Mail Certified Permit - USPS 3/10/15 4.03 4.03Mail Certified Permit - USPS 3/9/15 4.03 4.03Mail Certified Permit - USPS 4/7/15 4.03 4.03Mail Certified Permit/Compliance - USPS 3/2/15 4.03 4.03Pick Up GM Meeting Items - 6/9/15 3.45 3.45Pick Up GM Meeting Items - Ralphs 4/14/15 3.45 3.45Pick Up GM Meeting Items - Ralphs 5/12/15 3.45 3.45Pick Up O&M Day/Farewell - Costco/Marie Calendars 5/20/15 8.63 8.63PT Workshop Items - Marie Calendars/Panera 6/24/15 10.35 10.35

Sara Villa Total 91.49 91.49Grand Total 700.32 365.58 1626.25 245.40 8.00 36.00 1380.00 4361.55

111


112

Staff Celeste Cantú

Sum of Amount Expn TypePosting Date Activity Airfare Hotel Meals Misc Parking Parking Registration Grand Total

03/31/2015 AEP 2015 Conference - The Eagle Inn 3/24/15 556.80 556.80Ahwahnee Conference Speaker - Yosemite Lodging 3/21/15 252.97 252.97CA Water Commission - Ontario Airport 3/18/15 9.00 9.00Environmental Pillar Interview - Market Broiler 3/19/15 53.47 53.47PPIC Meeting 4/2/15 Flight - SWA 4/2/15 188.70 188.70Salton Sea Hearing - Ontario Airport 3/18/15 9.00 9.00Stormwater Hearing - Ambrosia Café 2/25/15 10.50 10.50Stormwater Hearing - Ontario Airport 2/26/15 9.00 9.00Urban Water Institute Conference Registration 3/5/15 50.00 50.00Urban Water Institute Conference Speaker - Hilton 3/4/15 170.21 170.21Well Conference - Renaissance 3/6/15 12.00 12.00

03/31/2015 Total 188.70 979.98 63.97 39.00 50.00 1321.6504/30/2015 ACWA Spring Conference, Sacramento - SWA 5/4/15 55.80 55.80

Reuse Hock Funding, Sacramento - SWA 5/4/15 55.80 55.80Sacramento Trip - Ontario Airport 4/9/15 9.00 9.00SWB Drought Hearing, Sacramento - SWA 5/4/15 55.80 55.80Team Orange Meeting - UC Irvine 4/20/15 10.00 10.00WEF Board Meeting, Sacramento - SWA 5/4/15 55.80 55.80

04/30/2015 Total 223.20 19.00 242.2005/31/2015 ACWA Conference - LA Bou 5/6/15 5.98 5.98

ACWA Conference - Mayahuel 5/8/15 15.14 15.14ACWA Spring Conference - City of Sacramento 5/5/15 10.00 10.00ACWA Spring Conference - City of Sacramento 5/6/15 10.00 10.00ACWA Spring Conference - City of Sacramento 5/7/15 14.50 14.50ACWA Spring Conference - City of Sacramento 5/8/15 1.50 1.50ACWA Spring Conference - Mayahuel 9.35 9.35ACWA Spring Conference - Priorty Parking 5/8/15 6.00 6.00ACWA Spring Conference, Cantú - Registration 5/5/15 560.00 560.00AEP Environmental State Conf - San Diego Airport 10/6/14 52.50 52.50CA Forward Conference - AMPCO 5/14/15 6.00 6.00California Forward Conference - Pershing Square 5/14/15 10.00 10.00CWEA Annual Conference - Town & County 4/29/15 6.00 6.00IECL Meeting & Event - Riverside 4/14/15 0.64 0.64International Water Assn Conference - BART 9/9/14 3.00 3.00Meeting with Kerry Schwabe - Best Thai Cuisine 11/5/14 18.25 18.25Pacific Institute Meeting - SWA 5/22/15 32.51 32.51Pacific Institute Meeting -Ontario Airport 5/22/15 9.00 9.00SAWPA Personnel Committee - Citrus City Grille 5/11/15 89.36 89.36

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityGeneral Manager - Expense Report

4th Quarter FYE 2015

113

Posting Date Activity Airfare Hotel Meals Misc Parking Parking Registration Grand Total42155 SWB Drought Hearing - City of Sacramento 5/5/15 10.00 10.00

SWB Drought Hearing - City of Sacramento 5/6/15 10.00 10.00SWB Drought Hearing - City of Sacramento 5/7/15 7.50 7.50SWB Drought Hearing - Mayahuel 5/7/15 9.34 9.34USDA Speaker - San Diego 4/28/15 6.00 6.00Water Foundation Funding - UCLA 5/19/15 12.00 12.00WEF Board Meeting - City of Sacramento 5/4/15 18.50 18.50WEF Board of Directors Meeting - San Diego 12/1/14 35.00 35.00

05/31/2015 Total 32.51 147.42 3.00 225.14 560.00 968.0707/01/2015 Ad Hoc Committee - Claim Jumper 6/15/15 58.63 58.63

AWWA Lunch - Moe's Chx Bowl 6/10/15 10.00 10.00AWWA Presentation - City of Anaheim 6/10/15 15.00 15.00Meeting with Kurt Bertold - Yard House 6/3/15 36.02 36.02Sacramento Trip 9/9/15 Flight - SWA 6/2/15 94.50 94.50WEF Board Meeting/Retreat 8/13/15 Flight - SWA 6/2/15 230.50 230.50

07/01/2015 Total 325.00 104.65 15.00 444.65Grand Total 769.41 979.98 316.04 3.00 39.00 259.14 610.00 2976.57

114