reagent optimization using factorial design and analysis ( p2 project )

23
REAGENT OPTIMIZATION Mototolo JV Concentrator Mzwanele Mosala 13 January 2016

Upload: mzwanele-mosala

Post on 15-Apr-2017

32 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

REAGENT OPTIMIZATION

Mototolo JV Concentrator

Mzwanele Mosala

13 January 2016

Page 2: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

PLATINUM

2

SAFETY

INTRODUCTION

PROBLEM STATEMENT

MOTIVATION

OBJECTIVES

METHODOLOGY

RESULTS & DISCUSSION

CONCLUSION

RECOMMENDATIONS

PRESENTATION LAYOUT

Page 3: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

PLATINUM

3

● LOST TIME INJURY FREE DAYS : 1522

● MEDICAL TREATMENT CASE : 119

● ENVIRONMENTAL INCIDENT FREE DAYS : 1309

RESILIENT

PROACTIVE

COMPLIANT

REACTIVE

BASIC

SAFETY

Page 4: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

PLATINUM

4

INTRODUCTION

Page 5: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

PLATINUM

INTRODUCTION

● Mototolo JV Concentrator is a platinum processing plant which treats UG2 ore.

● Designed to treat 200 000ktpm at 3,35g/t

● Plant configuration; MF2

5

Page 6: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

PLATINUM

• Head grade received from the mine ~= 3 g/t

• Due to the low head grade;

● Low recovery

● BP ounces not achieved

PROBLEM STATEMENT

Page 7: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

PLATINUM

• Increased throughput to 340tph (BP OUNCES STILL NOT MET)

• Cannot go beyond throughput of 340t/h (BOTTLENECKS ON

EQUIPMENT)

PROBLEM STATEMENT

Page 8: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

PLATINUM

LEVERS

● Grind (On target)

● Cell operating parameters

● Reagents

8

MOTIVATION

MUST Recovery

Page 9: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

PLATINUM

● Switching the depressant while maintaining same dosage at Bathopele showed positive

9

MOTIVATION

Page 10: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

PLATINUM

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

● No significant improvement on primary rougher recovery

● Primary rougher recovery ( and grade) to be improved

10

Parameter Rougher

Norilose

Rougher

No

Norilose

Mean 70.20 69.64

P( T<=t)

one tail

0.2914

Confidence 70.85

Parameter Cleaner

Norilose

Cleaner

No

Norilose

Mean 93.49 91.32

P( T<=t)

one tail

0.000179

Confidence 99.98

MOTIVATION

Page 11: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

PLATINUM

●To get optimal reagent regime (INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF REAGENTS)

●Improve plant recovery

●Meeting business plan ounces

OBJECTIVE

Page 12: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

PLATINUM

12

METHODOLOGY

Page 13: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

PLATINUM

• 2^k Factorial design

• 3 input variables ; Frother, Collector & Depressant.

• Where A= frother, B= collector, C depressant.

13

METHODOLOGY

Page 14: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

PLATINUM

METHODOLOGY

Norilose

Page 15: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

PLATINUM

15

Reagent Dosages

Low level 40% < target, High levels 40% > target.

8 runs + base at A 12g/t, B 150g/t, C 40g/t.

Lab Scale Flotation Cell

Page 16: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

PLATINUM

16

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONCATE

Page 17: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

PLATINUM

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Cube Plot

Recovery at base = 80.10%

Page 18: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

PLATINUM

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONAnalysis

Main effects: Depressant > Frother > Collector

Two-way interaction effects: Frother*Depressant > Collector* Depressant

Term Effect P Value

Frother 2.09 0.006

Collector 0.76 0.045

Depressant 2.25 0.005

Frother*Depressa

nt 4.56 0.001

Collector*Depres

sant 1.50 0.012

Page 19: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

PLATINUM

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Recovery increased by selectivity

Page 20: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

PLATINUM

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Optimization

Keeping collector at 150g/t, frother at 15g/t, Depressant at 56g/t.

High recovery achieved = 80%

Collector 150

Hold Values80

79

78

77

76

76

75

Frother

Dep

ress

ant

1615141312111098

55

50

45

40

35

30

25

Contour Plot of Recovery vs Depressant, Frother

Page 21: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

PLATINUM

● Rougher recovery improved by

selectivity

● Shifts the grade-recovery curve

● Due to Norilose properties.

● Reagent regime obtained

21

Conclusion

Page 22: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

PLATINUM

● Check concentration of frother in process water.

● Previous test 12.75ppm frother in process water.

● This changes from time to time, needs continuous monitoring.

● Increase depressant dosage to 56g/t and frother to obtained results from CCC.

● Put the test on a plant scale

22

Recommendations

Page 23: Reagent Optimization using Factorial Design and Analysis ( P2 Project )

PLATINUM

23

THANKYOU