r&d of interconnections for belle ii and slhc
DESCRIPTION
R&D of interconnections for Belle II and sLHC. R&D projects at the MPI semiconductor laboratory Requirements for ATLAS and Belle II pixel detectors Hybrid pixel d etectors versus m onolithic sensors DEPFETs for Belle II 3D integration for sLHC. ATLAS: Hybrid Pixel Detectors. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
H.-G. MoserMax-Planck-Institut
für Physik
VERTEX 2010 Loch Lomond June 10, 2010
1
R&D of interconnections for Belle II and sLHC
R&D projects at the MPI semiconductor laboratory
• Requirements for ATLAS and Belle II pixel detectors
• Hybrid pixel detectors versus monolithic sensors
• DEPFETs for Belle II
• 3D integration for sLHC
H.-G. MoserMax-Planck-Institut
für Physik
2
ATLAS: Hybrid Pixel Detectors
+ Large signal, good S/N+ High processing power in each pixel
fast, high rate capability+ Can be made very radiation hard
- Material (Sensor & ASIC, connectivity, tiling)- Large power dissipation (need active
cooling -> mass)- Cost driver: interconnection (non-standard high density bump bonding
50µm pitch)
VERTEX 2010 Loch Lomond June 10, 2010
Radiaton hardness (bulk damage)Fast readout with good timing (25 ns)
High momentum tracks: material less an issue (but still important)
Hybrid pixel detector (2 tier) & 3D interconnection
H.-G. MoserMax-Planck-Institut
für Physik
3
Belle II: Monolithic Detectors
+ low mass+ (almost) no interconnection (but need few ASICs with large pitch > 150µm)- Slow (frame readout, rolling shutter)
nn+
p p
p
n nn
+ ‘standard CMOS’ process+ complex CMOS circuit
(but limited to NMOS)- small signal, slow collection- Area limited by chip size
CMOS Sensors (MAPS)DSM CMOS with epil layer as sensor
DEPFETFET on fully depleted bulk
- non standard double-sided process
- simple, one stage amplifier+ large signal, fast collection+ wafer size sensors VERTEX 2010
Loch Lomond June 10, 2010
Radiation hardness (ionizing)Moderate fast readout (20 µs)
Soft tracks: O(1 GeV) < 0.2% X0 requiredMonolithic active pixel sensor (DEPFET)
Integrate readout electronics (amplification) into sensor
H.-G. MoserMax-Planck-Institut
für Physik
DEPFETEach pixel is a p-channel FET on a completely depleted bulk
A deep n-implant creates a potential minimum for electrons under the gate (“internal gate”)
Signal electrons accumulate in the internal gate and modulate the transistor current (gq ~ 400 pA/e-)
Accumulated charge can be removed by a clear contact (“reset”)
Fully depleted: Þ large signal, fast signal collection
Low capacitance, internal amplification: => low noise
High S/N even for thin sensors (50µm)
Rolling shutter mode (column parallel) for matrix operationÞ 20 µs frame readout time=> Low power (only few lines powered)
n x mpixel
IDRAIN
DEPFET- matrix
VGATE, OFF
off
off
on
off
VGATE, ON
gate
drain VCLEAR, OFF
off
off
reset
off
VCLEAR, ON
reset
output
0 suppressionVCLEAR-Control
4
VERTEX 2010 Loch Lomond June 10, 2010
H.-G. MoserMax-Planck-Institut
für Physik
5
DEPFET Performance
Low noise: x-ray spectroscopy and imaging
High speed -> noise ~ t-1/2
At 50MHz: ENC < 40e (for 50ns readout )
For tracking: even thinned (but fully depleted) detectors have excellent S/N
S/N > 200 measured for d=450 mmS/N ~ 40 achievable for d=50 mmPosition resolution < 2 mm in beam tests
Fe55: 1.6 e- rms noise, Room temperature !10 ms shaping time
VERTEX 2010 Loch Lomond June 10, 2010
H.-G. MoserMax-Planck-Institut
für Physik
Pixels: 50 x 50(75) µm 75µm thick 0.18% X02 layers: @1.4(2.2) cm
Thickness:75 µm
total of 8 Mpx
6
DEPFET for Belle II
Power consumption in sensitive area: 0.1W/cm² => air-cooling sufficient
Barcelona (Uni, CNM, Ramon Lull), Bonn, Heidelberg,Giessen, Göttingen,Karlsruhe, Krakow, Munich (MPI, TU, LMU), Prague, Santander, Santiago de CompostellaValencia, KEK
VERTEX 2010 Loch Lomond June 10, 2010
H.-G. MoserMax-Planck-Institut
für Physik
7
Sensor Thinning
?
Process backsidee.g. structured implant
sensor wafer
handle wafer
1. implant backsideon sensor wafer
2. bond sensor waferto handle wafer
3. thin sensor sideto desired thickness
4. process DEPFETson top side
5. structure resist,etch backside upto oxide/implant
Industry: TraciT, GrenobleHLL HLL main lab HLL special lab
sensor wafer
handle wafer
1. implant backsideon sensor wafer
2. bond sensor waferto handle wafer
3. thin sensor sideto desired thickness
4. process DEPFETson top side
5. structure resist,etch backside upto oxide/implant
Industry: TraciT, GrenobleHLL HLL main lab HLL special lab
sensor wafer
handle wafer
1. implant backsideon sensor wafer
2. bond sensor waferto handle wafer
3. thin sensor sideto desired thickness
4. process DEPFETson top side
5. structure resist,etch backside upto oxide/implant
Industry: TraciT, GrenobleHLL HLL main lab HLL special lab
sensor wafer
handle wafer
1. implant backsideon sensor wafer
2. bond sensor waferto handle wafer
3. thin sensor sideto desired thickness
4. process DEPFETson top side
5. structure resist,etch backside upto oxide/implant
Industry: TraciT, GrenobleHLL HLL main lab HLL special lab
sensor wafer
handle wafer
1. implant backsideon sensor wafer
2. bond sensor waferto handle wafer
3. thin sensor sideto desired thickness
4. process DEPFETson top side
5. structure resist,etch backside upto oxide/implant
Industry: TraciT, GrenobleHLL HLL main lab HLL special lab
sensor wafer
handle wafer
1. implant backsideon sensor wafer
2. bond sensor waferto handle wafer
3. thin sensor sideto desired thickness
4. process DEPFETson top side
5. structure resist,etch backside upto oxide/implant
Industry: TraciT, GrenobleHLL HLL main lab HLL special lab
sensor wafer
handle wafer
1. implant backsideon sensor wafer
2. bond sensor waferto handle wafer
3. thin sensor sideto desired thickness
4. process DEPFETson top side
5. structure resist,etch backside upto oxide/implant
Industry: TraciT, GrenobleHLL HLL main lab HLL special lab
sensor wafer
handle wafer
1. implant backsideon sensor wafer
2. bond sensor waferto handle wafer
3. thin sensor sideto desired thickness
4. process DEPFETson top side
5. structure resist,etch backside upto oxide/implant
Industry: TraciT, GrenobleHLL HLL main lab HLL special lab
sensor wafer
handle wafer
1. implant backsideon sensor wafer
2. bond sensor waferto handle wafer
3. thin sensor sideto desired thickness
4. process DEPFETson top side
5. structure resist,etch backside upto oxide/implant
Industry: TraciT, GrenobleHLL HLL main lab HLL special lab
sensor wafer
handle wafer
1. implant backsideon sensor wafer
2. bond sensor waferto handle wafer
3. thin sensor sideto desired thickness
4. process DEPFETson top side
5. structure resist,etch backside upto oxide/implant
Industry: TraciT, GrenobleHLL HLL main lab HLL special lab
Wafer bondingSOI process
Thinning of top wafer (CMP)
Processing etching of handle wafer (structured)
diodes and large mechanical samples Belle II module
Need thin (50µm-75µm) self supporting all silicon module
VERTEX 2010 Loch Lomond June 10, 2010
H.-G. MoserMax-Planck-Institut
für Physik
ASICs for control and readoutSwitcher (Heidelberg)
DCD (Heidelberg)
DHP (Bonn)• Common mode correction• Pedestal subtraction• (16 events average)• DCD offset compensation
(2bit)• Switcher control• Test chip (1/2)• 32 channels• C4 bump bonding• Submitted IBM 90nm
• Produced in UMC 180nm
In order to get a very compact module layout bump bonding is needed for the interconnection to the DEPFET sensor
Moderate pitch 150 to 200 µm
Use standard processes whenever available
8
VERTEX 2010 Loch Lomond June 10, 2010
H.-G. MoserMax-Planck-Institut
für Physik
9
Interconnection: Bump BondingDCD (UMC 180nm) :MPW delivered with bumps (SnAgCu, pitch 180µm)
DHP (IBM 90nm) MPW delivered with C4 bumps(SnAg, pitch 200µm)
Switcher: no bumping offered by AMS for MPW => in house (Heidelberg)
VERTEX 2010 Loch Lomond June 10, 2010
H.-G. MoserMax-Planck-Institut
für Physik
Cu UBM compatible with DEPFET technology?
10
Sensor test structes prepared at HLL
CNM, Barcelona
sputter barier and seed layerCu electroplating
Sputter and Cu plating is presently being implemented asbackend process at the HLL(also for other projects: XFEL, sLHC…)
Correlation of leakage currents before and after UBM
VERTEX 2010 Loch Lomond June 10, 2010
H.-G. MoserMax-Planck-Institut
für Physik
11
Future: 3D integrationPerformance of DEPFET sensors ultimatelylimited by slow frame readoutBX identification not possible, long integration time
Hybrid pixel detectors offer high processing power per pixel
Need to reduce material, cost (fine pitch bump bonding) and power
3D integration: Evolution of hybrid pixels
high density, low mass interconnection of several (thin) layers (tiers)‘quasi-monolithic detectors’
Si pixel sensor
VERTEX 2010 Loch Lomond June 10, 2010
Optimized Module Design: Less material:
• thin sensors and ASICs• higher fill factor• Reduced cantilever• backside connectivity• slim edges
Radiation hardness:thin sensors improve CCE (rtapping)
H.-G. MoserMax-Planck-Institut
für Physik
12
MPI 3D R&D Program Build demonstrator using ATLAS pixel chip (FE-I2/3) and thin pixel sensors made by MPI
(complete wafers with FEI2, FEI3 chips available!)
Use interconnection technology allowing postprocessing
Interconnection with SLID and ICV technology by Fraunhofer IZM
Demonstration of postprocessing of standard ASICs with via last
R&D Issues:
• Technology: compatible with sensors, ASICs?
• Interconnection quality: e.g. capacitance
• Yield & Costs.
• Production in industry. • Material (copper layer).
VERTEX 2010 Loch Lomond June 10, 2010
H.-G. MoserMax-Planck-Institut
für Physik
13
Sensors
In house production onFZ-SOI material (2 kWcm)
Detector wafer thickness75 µm and 150 µm
p- and n-type materialp-spray insulation
Udep 20V and 80V(before irradiation)
~ 100% CCE at 1016 n/cm²
75 µmVERTEX 2010 Loch Lomond June 10, 2010
H.-G. MoserMax-Planck-Institut
für Physik
14
IZM SLID Process
• Alternative to bump bonding (less process steps “low cost” (IZM)).• Small pitch possible (<< 20 mm, depending on pick & place precision).• Stacking possible (next bonding process does not affect previous bond).• Wafer to wafer and chip to wafer possible.
• However: no rework!
VERTEX 2010 Loch Lomond June 10, 2010
H.-G. MoserMax-Planck-Institut
für Physik
15
Inter Chip Vias
• Hole etching and chip thinning• Via formation with W-plugs.• Face to face or die up connections.• 2.5 Ohm/per via (including SLID).• No significant impact on chip performance (MOS transistors).
ICV = Inter Chip Vias
Etching (Bosch process)
Insulation, filling with tungsten
Electroplating, metallisation
Back thinning
Electroplating, metallisation
VERTEX 2010 Loch Lomond June 10, 2010
H.-G. MoserMax-Planck-Institut
für Physik
16
Test of SLID interconnection with metal dummies.
Aim: determine the feasibility of the SLID inter-connection within the parameters we need for the ATLAS pixels.
Test of the mechanical strength as a function of different area coverage by the SLID pads
Test the SLID efficiency varying the dimensions of the SLID pads
Study the SLID efficiency when degrading the planarity of the structure underneath the pads
Determine the alignment precision between single “chip” and “detector” wafer
Investigate the BCB isolation capability between the detector and chip surfaces
Tests of metal dummies
SLID Pad
27x58 mm2
10% SLID coverage
SLID Pad 27x360 mm2
50% SLID coverage
20 um
30 um
15 um
25 um
SiO2
Al
Cu3Sn
Al
BCBVERTEX 2010 Loch Lomond June 10, 2010
H.-G. MoserMax-Planck-Institut
für Physik
17
Test interconnections (SLID)
Number ofPad width Pitch Aplanarity measured SLID SLID Resistance per
[μm2] [μm] pads Inefficiencyconnection [Ω]30 x 30 60 0 8288 <4.4x10-4 0.73±0.4780 x 80 115 0 1120 <3.3x10-3 0.29±0.2680 x 80 100 0 1288 <2.9x10-3 0.25±0.1240x40 70 0 2016 <1.5x10-3 0.37±0.2630 x 30 60 100 nm 5400 (10±4)x10-4 0.58±0.4630 x 30 60 1 μm 5400 (4±3)x10-4 0.58±0.40
Special test wafers for SLID testsChains of SLID connections
VERTEX 2010 Loch Lomond June 10, 2010
H.-G. MoserMax-Planck-Institut
für Physik
18
Problems
Pad size 80x80 µm²Pitch 100 µm
Shorts:
No problems with small pads(30 x 30 µm² and 50 x 50 µm²)
However, many shorts for larger pads(80 x 80 µm²)
Amount of tin needs to be adjusted according to pad size and coverage (pressure)
Bad connection:
Some chips fell offDifferences in height: some chips not in proper contact!
Þ Chips came from different wafers (some 20 µm tolerances!)
Þ Different chip sizes lead to variations of local pressure
Use chips from same wafers (or make sure that they have equal thickness
Look even at radial position of chip on wafer (wafer thickness spherical)
Use only chips of same size
VERTEX 2010 Loch Lomond June 10, 2010
H.-G. MoserMax-Planck-Institut
für Physik
19
Project Status
Cu electroplating of FEI3 chips for SLID UBM done
Dummy pads needed for extra mechanical strength
Pixel pads
Dummy pads (Type A)
1
2
3 Identification of Target area for ICV etching: Investigation with a FIB analysis to identify
possible areas for TSV etching:
1) Central region between pads: filling structures with superimposed tungsten plugs and metal layers
2) Covered by top metal layer in some pads3) ICV directly over the pad area after having
etched away the top aluminum layer
VERTEX 2010 Loch Lomond June 10, 2010
H.-G. MoserMax-Planck-Institut
für Physik
20
Next Steps
Sensor/ASIC interconnection using SLID- ASIC thinned to 200 µm- No vias, integrated fanout on sensor for service connection
Sensor/ASIC interconnection using SLID-ASIC thinned to 50 µm-vias for service connections (fanouts for redundancy)
Future: SLID interconnection of sensors/ 3D FEI4
Sensor/ASIC interconnection using SLID- ASIC thinned to 200 µm- No vias, integrated fan-out on sensor for service connection
Sensor/ASIC interconnection using SLID-ASIC thinned to 50 µm-vias for service connections (fan-outs for redundancy)
Future: SLID interconnection of sensors/ 3D FEI4
VERTEX 2010 Loch Lomond June 10, 2010
H.-G. MoserMax-Planck-Institut
für Physik
21
Summary
DEPFETs for Belle II:
precision vertex detector optimized for low momentum tracksemphasis on low mass and low powerradiation hard up to 10 Mradfast frame readout for low occupancy despite high backgroundthin, self supporting all-silicon detectorslow number of large pitch interconnectsuse industry standard bump bonding
3D integration of sensor and ASIC for sLHC
SLID interconnection as alternative to fine pitch bump bondingvias for backside connectivity (4-side buttable)3D integration using via last postprocessing
thin sensors for radiation hardness (1016 n/cm²)
VERTEX 2010 Loch Lomond June 10, 2010