rabbit liver microsomal lipid peroxidation the effect of lipid on the rate of peroxidation
TRANSCRIPT
Biochimica et Biophysics Acta, 712 (1982) 1-9 Elsevier Biomedical Press
BBA 51121
RABBIT LIVER MICROSOMAL LIPID PEROXIDATION
THE EFFECT OF LIPID ON THE RATE OF PEROXIDATION
MING TIEN and STEVEN D. AUST
Department of Biochemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 (U.S.A.)
(Received November 20th. 1981)
Key words: Cytochrome P-450; Lipid peroxidation; Fatty acid; (Rabbit liver microsome)
Rat and rabbit liver microsomes catalyze an NADPH-cytochrome P-450 reductase-dependent peroxidation of endogenous lipid in the presence of the chelate, ADP-Fe 3+ Although liver microsomes from both species .
contain comparable levels of NADPH-cytochrome P-450 reductase and cytochrome P-450, the rate of lipid pet-oxidation (assayed by malondialdehyde and lipid hydroperoxide formation) catalyzed by rabbit liver microsomes is only about 40% of that catalyzed by rat liver microsomes. Microsomal lipid peroxidation was reconstituted with liposomes made from extracted microsomal lipid and purified protease-solubilized NADPH-cytochrome P-450 reductase from both rat and rabbit liver microsomes. The results demonstrated that the lower rates of lipid peroxidation catalyzed by rabbit liver microsomes could not be attributed to the specific activity of the reducfase. Microsomal lipid from rabbit liver was found to be much less susceptible to lipid per-oxidation. This was due to the lower polyunsaturated fatty acid content rather than the presence of antioxidants in rabbit liver microsomal lipid. Gas-liquid chromatographic analysis of fatty acids lost during microsomal lipid peroxidation revealed that the degree of fatty acid unsaturation correlated well with rates of lipid peroxidation.
Introduction
Microsomal NADPH-cytochrome P-450 re-
ductase-dependent lipid peroxidation has been ex-
tensively studied in microsomes isolated from rat
livers. Numerous investigators have demonstrated
that the addition of Fe3+, chelated by ADP (ADP-Fe3+) [l-6], and NADPH [7,8] to micro- somes greatly enhances the rate of lipid peroxida- tion. Peroxidation of microsomal lipid is evidenced
by molecular oxygen uptake, with the concom- mitant formation of malondialdehyde and lipid hydroperoxides.
It is generally thought that NADPH-cyto- chrome P-450 reductase catalyzes electron transfer from NADPH to an intermediate which is a pre- cursor to a more reactive species that initiates lipid
peroxidation [9-l 11. Cytochrome P-450 has also
been proposed to participate in microsomal lipid
peroxidation by reacting with lipid hydroperoxides
to yield free radical products [ 121. These free radi-
cal products can then further react in the propaga-
tion of lipid peroxidation. However, other investi-
gators have questioned the participation of cyto- chrome P-450 in microsomal lipid peroxidation [ 13,141.
Rat and rabbit liver microsomes have been found to contain similar levels of cytochrome P-450
[ 151. It has also been reported that rabbit and rat liver microsomes contain comparable levels of NADPH-cytochrome P-450 reductase [ 151. How- ever, the rate of lipid peroxidation catalyzed by rabbit liver microsomes is much lower than that of rat liver microsomes [ 16- 181. Levin and co-workers
000%2760/82/0000-0000/$02.75 0 1982 Elsevier Biomedical Press
2
[16] found lower rates of lipid peroxidation cata-
lyzed by rabbit liver microsomes as detected by
cytochrome P-450 destruction. Gram and Fouts
[ 171 observed that the microsomal supernatant
fraction of rabbit livers catalyzed lower rates of
lipid peroxidation than similar supernatant of rat
livers when assayed by malondialdehyde forma-
tion.
Mishin and co-workers [ 181 also reported lower
rates of lipid peroxidation catalyzed by rabbit liver
microsomes. The rationale for these findings have
included either the increased content of endoge-
nous antioxidants or structural peculiarities of the
rabbit liver microsomal membrane. To help clarify
this area, we have reconfirmed the relatively slow
rates of lipid peroxidation catalyzed by rabbit liver
microsomes and, in addition, have characterized
the lipid of rat and rabbit liver microsomes to
determine whether possible differences in the com-
position of the lipid could account for the ob-
served rates of lipid peroxidation.
Materials and Methods
Thiobarbituric acid, NADPH, cytochrome c
(Type VI), ADP, bromelain and butylated hy-
droxytoluene were obtained from Sigma Chemical
Co. (St. Louis, MO). Column packing for gas-
liquid chromatography was a product of Supelco
(Bellefonte, PA). All reagents were analytical grade and were used without further purification.
Rat liver microsomes were isolated from 250-
274-g male Sprague-Dawley rats (Spartan Re-
search Animals, Haslett, MI) fed on standard rat
lab chow by the method of Pederson et al. [lo].
Rabbit liver microsomes were also isolated by this
method from 2-kg male New Zealand white rab- bits (Spartan Research Animals) fed on standard
rabbit lab chow. Microsomes were washed by re- suspension in argon-purged, distilled deionized water to a protein concentration of 5 mg/ml and centrifugation at 100000 X g for 90 min. All mi- crosomes were stored in argon-purged 50 mM Tris-HCl at -20°C (pH 7.5 at 37°C). Microsomal lipid was extracted by the method of Folch et al. [ 191 and stored at - 20°C in CHCl JCH ,OH (2: 1). All solvents used in microsomes and lipid isolation and storage were purged with argon and
kept at 4°C to prevent autoxidation of microsomal
lipid. NADPH-cytochrome P-450 reductase (EC
1.6.2.4) was purified from both rat and rabbit liver
microsomes after bromelain solubilization to a
specific activity to 55 units/mg protein [lo]. Microsomal lipid peroxidation reaction mix-
tures contained ADP-Fe3+ (3 mM ADP, 0.15 mM
FeCl,), 0.5 mg/ml microsomal protein and 0.1
mM NADPH in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, at
37°C unless otherwise indicated in the figure
legends. Liposomal lipid peroxidation reaction
mixtures contained 1 pmol lipid phosphate/ml,
0.1 unit NADPH-cytochrome P-450 reductase/ml,
ADP-Fe3+ (1.7 mM ADP, 0.1 mM FeCl,),
EDTA-Fe3+ (0.11 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM FeCl,),
and 0.1 mM NADPH in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5
at 37°C. Reactions were initiated by the addition
of NADPH. Iron chelate solutions were made by
the addition of FeCl, to the appropriate chelate
solutions and then the pH was adjusted. All iron
chelate concentrations are expressed as concentra-
tions of FeCl,. Lipid peroxidation was assayed by
malondialdehyde and lipid hydroperoxide forma-
tion [20]. To prevent further peroxidation of lipids
during the malondialdehyde assay, 0.02 vol. of
ethanolic 2% butylated hydroxytoluene was added
to the 2-thiobarbituric acid stock solution [21]. All
rates are initial velocities calculated from the lin-
ear portion of the curve. All reactions were carried
out at 37°C in a metabolic shaking water baths
under an air atmosphere.
The fatty acid composition of the microsomal phospholipids was determined by gas-liquid chro-
matographic analysis of the methyl esters. Methyl esters were prepared by the method of Morrison
and Smith [22]. Chromatography was performed
on a Varian Model 3700 gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector. The
glass column (6 feet X l/4 inch outer diameter)
was packed with 10% DEGS-PS on 80/100 Supelcoport.
Protein content was determined by the method of Lowry et al. [23]. Total lipid phosphate was assayed by the method of Bartlett [24]. NADPH- cytochrome P-450 reductase activity was measured by cytochrome c reduction [lo]. Cytochrome P-450 content was calculated from its carbon monoxide difference spectrum [25].
Results
Microsomal enzymes and lipid peroxidation in rat
and rabbit liver microsomes
Table1 is a comparison of the specific activity
of NADPH-cytochrome P-450 reductase (mea-
sured by cytochrome c reduction), the specific
content of cytochrome P-450, and the rates of
lipid peroxidation in rat and rabbit liver micro-
somes. The specific activities of the reductase and
the specific content of cytochrome P-450 in micro-
somes from the two species were approximately
equal. In contrast, the rates of NADPH and ADP-
Fe3+-dependent lipid peroxidation catalyzed by
rabbit liver microsomes were only 41 and 38% of
the activity of rat liver microsomes when assessed
by malondialdehyde and lipid hydroperoxide for-
mation, respectively. Extensive studies were per-
formed to assure that the comparative rates of
lipid peroxidation in the rat and rabbit systems
were determined under optimal conditions for each
microsomal preparation. Lipid peroxidation in-
cubation conditions were optimized in regards to
pH, ionic strength, NADPH concentration and
protein concentration (data not shown). The effect
of iron and chelation of iron by ADP were also
examined to optimize the rate of lipid peroxida-
tion. Fig. 1 plots the rate malondialdehyde and
lipid hydroperoxide formation in rabbit liver mi-
crosomes as a function of ADP concentration. The Fe”+ concentration was kept constant (0.15 mM).
ADP:Fe3’ molar ratio
Fig. 1. Rabbit liver microsomal lipid peroxidation as a function
of ADP: FeCl, molar ratio. Microsomal reaction mixtures con-
tained 0.5 mg of microsomal protein/ml, 0.1 mM NADPH.
0.15 mM FeCl, and the specified amount of ADP in 50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 at 37°C. Incubation and assay conditions are
described in Materials and Methods. A, Lipid hydroperoxide;
0, malondialdehyde.
The results indicate that the rate of lipid peroxida-
tion is exceedingly sensitive to ADP chelation of
Fe3+. Activity increased rapidly when the molar
ratio of ADP to Fe3+ increased to 20 : 1. No
increase in the rate of malondialdehyde or lipid
hydroperoxide formation was associated with
higher ratios of ADP to Fe3+. A similar lipid
peroxidation profile was seen with rat liver micro-
TABLE I
MICROSOMAL ENZYMES AND LIPID PEROXIDATION IN RAT AND RABBIT LIVER MICROSOMES
Rat and rabbit liver microsomal lipid peroxidation reaction mixtures contained 0.5 mg protein/ml, ADP-Fe3+ (1.7 mM ADP, 0.1
mM FeCl,) and 0.1 mM NADPH in 50 mM Tris-HCI, pH 7.5 at 37°C. Incubation and assay conditions are described in Materials
and Methods. Values are mean* S.E. Values in parenthesis are percentage of the corresponding parameter in rat liver microsomes.
Cytochrome P-450
(nmol/mg protein)
NADPH-
cytochrome P-450
reductase
(units/mg protein)
Lipid peroxidation
(nmol/min per mg protein)
Malon- Lipid
dialdehyde hydroperoxides
Rabbit liver microsomes
(n =6)
Rat liver microsomes
(n=6)
1.06 * 0.09 0.25 -to.03 1.15*0.20 6.250.4
(9651;) (89%) (41%) (38%)
l.lO”O.06 0.28t0.01 2.78r0.08 16.5-t 1.0
somes (not shown). Fig. 2 shows the effect of Fe3+
(chelated by ADP, 20: 1 molar ratio) concentra- tion on the rate of rabbit liver microsomal lipid
peroxidation. Very low rates of lipid peroxidation
occurred in the absence of added Fe3+. The rates
of malondialdehyde and lipid hydroperoxide for- mation increased rapidly with increased ADP-Fe3+
[ADP-Fe? (mM)
Fig. 2. Rabbit liver microsomal lipid peroxidation as a function
of ADP-Fe3+ concentration. Microsomal reaction mixtures
contained 0.5 mg of microsomal protein/ml, 0.1 mM NADPH,
and the specified amount of FeCI, in 50 mM Tris-HCI, pH 7.5
at 37°C. The ADP:FeCl, molar ratio was kept constant at
20 : 1. Incubation and assay conditions are described in Materi-
als and Methods. A, Lipid hydroperoxides; 0, malondialde-
hyde.
0 2 4 6 8 IO 12 14
Time (mid
Fig. 3. Time course of rabbit liver microsomal lipid peroxida-
tion. Microsomal reaction mixtures contained 0.5 mg of micro-
somal protein/ml, ADP-Fe ‘+ (3 mM ADP, 0.15 mM, FeCl,),
and 0.1 mM NADPH in 50 mM Tris-HCI, pH 7.5 at 37°C.
Incubation and assay conditions are described in Materials and
Methods. A, Lipid hydroperoxides; 0, malondialdehyde.
concentration. Maximum rates of lipid peroxida-
tion were obtained when the ADP-Fe3+ con-
centration was greater than 0.12 mM. Again, rat
liver microsomes exhibited a similar lipid per-
oxidation profile.
Fig. 3 shows the time course of malondialde-
hyde and lipid hydroperoxide formation during a
TABLE II
RECONSTITUTION OF RABBIT LIVER MICROSOMAL LIPID PEROXIDATION
Reaction mixtures contained liposomes (1 prnol lipid phosphate/ml) in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 at 37°C. The following additions
were made as indicated: 0.1 mM NADPH, ADP-Fe 3+ (I.7 mM ADP, 0.1 mM FeCI,), EDTA-Fe3+ (0.11 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM
FeCI,), and 0.1 unit NADPH-cytochrome P-450 reductase. Incubation and assay conditions are described in Materials and Methods.
Values are nmoI/min per ml.
Additions Malondialdehyde Lipid
hydroperoxides
None 0.0 1 0.1
NADPH 0.05 0.4
ADP-Fe3+ 0.05 0.3
NADPH, reductase 0.05 0.4
ADP-Fe3+, reductase 0.05 0.3
NADPH, ADP-Fe’+ , reductase, 0.23 0.9
NADPH, ADP-Fe3+, reductase, EDTA-Fe3+ 0.83 7.5
5
rabbit liver microsomal lipid peroxidation reaction
at optimal conditions. The rate of lipid peroxida- tion calculated from Fig. 3 is approximately 40%
of that for rat liver microsomes. These microsomal
lipid peroxidation studies have utilized Tris-HCl as a buffer. Tris-HCl has been shown to inhibit
hydroxyl radical-dependent reactions [26]. The ef-
fect of Tris-HCl on microsomal lipid peroxidation
was investigated and 50 mM Tris-HCl had no
effect of the rate of microsomal lipid peroxidation
when compared to incubations containing 50 mM
NaCl (not shown).
Reconstitution of microsomal lipid peroxidation
Lipid peroxidation was reconstituted using the
reconstitution system of Pederson et al. [lo]. Lipo-
somes made from extracted microsomal phos-
pholipid (1 pmol lipid phosphate/ml) were in-
cubated with 0.1 unit/ml purified protease-solubi-
lized reductase, 0.1 mM NADPH and various iron
chelates (ADP-Fe3+ and EDTA-Fe3+). In the re-
constitution of rabbit liver microsomal lipid per-
oxidation, the incubation of liposomes and re- ductase of rabbit origin with NADPH and ADP-
Fe3+ (0.1 mM) resulted in low rates of lipid
peroxidation (0.23 nmol malondialdehyde/min per ml and 0.9 nmol lipid hydroperoxides/min per ml)
(Table II). The addition of EDTA-Fe3+ (0.11 mM
EDTA, 0.1 mM FeCl,) to this reaction mixture
caused an 8-fold increase in the rate of lipid
hydroperoxide formation and a 3.6-fold increase
in the rate of malondialdehyde formation.
The relative rates of lipid peroxidation cata-
lyzed by rat and rabbit liver microsomal re-
ductases are shown in Table III. As previously
reported [ 181, rat and rabbit liver microsomal re-
ductases are equally active in catalyzing lipid per-
oxidation. Irrespective of the reductase origin, the
rates of malondialdehyde and lipid hydroperoxide
formation in liposomes made from extracted rab-
bit liver microsomal lipid (1 pmol lipid phos-
phate/ml) were consistantly 40 and 43%, respec- tively, of that for liposomes made from extracted
rat liver microsomal lipid (1 pmol lipid phos-
phate/ml). The same relative difference in rate
was observed in microsomal reaction mixtures. To
examine whether the lower rates of lipid peroxida-
tion observed with liposomes of rabbit origin were
due to the presence of antioxidants or other inhibi-
tors in the lipid, liposomes (1 pmol lipid phos-
phate/ml) of rabbit origin were added to a reac-
tion mixture containing rat reconstitution compo-
nents (Table III). To ensure that the liposomes
(containing phospholipids from both rat and rab-
bit liver microsomes) were well intermixed, the
phospholipids (chloroform/methanol suspension)
were mixed prior to liposomes preparation. As
shown in Table III, the rate of lipid peroxidation
TABLE III
RECONSTITUTION OF MICROSOMAL LIPID PEROXIDATION WITH RAT AND RABBIT LIVER MICROSOMAL
COMPONENTS
Reaction mixtures contained ADP-Fe 3+ (1.7 mM ADP, 0.1 mM FeCl,), EDTA-Fe 3f (0.11 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM FeCl,), 0.1 mM
NADPH, liposomes (1 pmol lipid phosphate/ml) made from rat or rabbit microsomal lipid as indicated, and 0.1 unit NADPH-cyto-
chrome P-450 reductase from rat or rabbit microsomes, as indicated, in 50 mM Tris-HCI, pH 7.5 at 37°C. The incubation containing
liposomes made from both rat and rabbit microsomal lipid contained each at an equal molar ratio totalling 2 pmol lipid
phosphate/ml. Incubation and assay conditions are described in Materials and Methods. Values are nmol/min per ml.
Conditions
Source of lipid Source of reductase
Malondialdehyde Lipid hydroperoxides
Rabbit Rabbit 1.19 8.0
Rabbit Rat 1.12 8.2
Rat Rabbit 2.70 18.9
Rat Rat 3.18 18.9
Rat, rabbit Rat 2.90 20.5
Lipid Phosphate (mM) Lipid Phosphate (mM) 6
Fig. 4, Effect of lipid phosphate concentration on reconstituted lipid peroxidation. A. Reaction mixtures contained 0.1 units/ml of rat
microsomal reductasc, ADP-Fe 3t (1.7 mM ADP, 0.1 mM F&J,), EDTA-Fe 3+ (0.1 I tnM EDTA, 0.1 mM F&l,). 0.1 mM NADPH. and liposames (made from extracted rat microsomal lipid) at the specified lipid phosphate concentralmn in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5
at 37°C. B. Experimental conditions were as indicated in A except the liposomes were made from extracted rabbit microsomal lipid. Incubation and assay conditions are described in Materials and Methods. MDA, malondialdehyde.
observed with these liposomes were not lower than data show that rat liver microsomal lipid is en-
incubations containing rat reconstituted compo- riched with arachidonic and docosahexaenoic acid.
nents. In contrast, docosahexaenoic acid was undetecta- The effect of lipid concentration (standardized
by lipid phosphate content) on the rate of lipid
peroxidation in the reconstituted system is shown in Fig. 4. Rat liver microsomal lipid was near
saturation at a concentration of 1 pmol lipid phos-
phate/ml (Fig. 4A). However, at an identical con- centration rabbit liver rnicrosomal lipid was still
limiting (Fig. 4R). The rates of malondialdehyde
formation increased linearly with increased rabbit
liver microsomal lipid content, demonstrating no evidence of saturation even at 6pmol lipid phos-
phate/ml.
TABLE IV
FATTY ACID COMPQSITIQN OF MICROSOMAL PHOS-
PHOLIPIDS
Phospholipids were extracted from rat and rabbit liver micro-
somes (5 mg protein). The phospholipids were hydrolyzed and
the methyl esters of the fatty acids were prepared for gas chromatograpbic analyses as described in Materials and Meth-
ods. The instrument conditions were: carrier gas flow rate of 30
ml/m.in, temperature program of l70-220°C at 3”C/min. The
fatty acid composition is expressed as the percentage (w/w) of
pahnitic acid in the specified sample. The values in parenthesis
represent the percentage (w/w) of palmitic acid in each sample.
Values are mg/IOO mg palmitic acid.
Since the results shown in Table III suggested that the lower rates of rabbit liver microsomal lipid peroxidation were not due to antioxidants or other inhibitors, the fatty acid composition of microsomal phospholipids was examined. The re- sults of these analyses are shown in Table IV. The content of each fatty acid is expressed as per- centage of the palmitic acid content (w/w>. The
Fatty acid Rat microsomes Rabbit microsomes
Palmitic loo (19%) Steak 147 OkiC 39 Linoleic 70 Arachidonic 156
Docosahexenocc 25
IO0 (22%)
I09
65
132 49
not detected
B I I 1
5 IO I5
Time (mid
Fig. 5. Analysis of fatty acids lost during microsomal lipid
peroxidation. The rate of fatty acids lost during microsomal
lipid peroxidation was determined by sampling 5-ml aliquots of
reactions mixtures at the times indicated. The aliquots were
analyzed for fatty acid content as described in the legend to
Table IV and in Materials and Methods. The content of the
specified fatty acids are expressed as the percentage (w/w) of
the original content. The number preceding the colon indicates
the carbon chain length; the number following indicates the
number of double bonds present. A. Reaction mixtures con-
tained 0.5 mg/ml of rat liver microsomal protein, ADP-Fe3+
(3 mM ADP, 0.15 mM FeCl,) and 0.1 mM NADPH in 50 mM
Tris-HCI, pH 7.5 at 37’C. B. Experimental conditions were as
indicated in A except the microsomes were of rabbit liver
origin.
7
ble and arachidonic acid was present in much
lower levels in the rabbit liver microsomal lipid.
Linoleic acid accounted for 29% (w/w) of the total
rabbit liver microsomal fatty acids. The fatty acid
content (mg fatty acid/mg protein) of rat liver
microsomes was approximately the same as found
with rabbit liver microsomes. Loss of fatty acids during microsomal lipid
peroxidation was measured by gas-liquid chro-
matography. The results of the analyses are shown
in Fig. 5. The degree of unsaturation of a fatty
acid correlated well with the rate of its disap-
pearance. Although docosahexaenoic acid accounts
for less than 5% (w/w) of the total rat liver
microsomal fatty acids, the rate of disappearance
was greatest (Fig. 5A). The rates of arachidonic
and linoleic acid disappearance were lower; the
saturated fatty acids and oleic acid did not show
any appreciable loss (Fig. 5A). The profile of fatty
acid loss in rabbit liver microsomes was similar to
that of rat liver microsomes (Fig. 5B). These re-
sults suggest that the lower polyunsaturated fatty acid content in microsomal phospholipid is the
limiting factor in rabbit liver microsomal lipid
peroxidation.
Enhancement of microsomal lipid peroxidation To examine further whether polyunsaturated
fatty acids are the limiting component in rabbit
liver microsomal lipid peroxidation, liposomes were
added to the microsomal reaction mixture. Table V
shows that the addition of liposomes (0.2 pmol
lipid phosphate/ml) to the microsomal reaction
TABLE V
ENHANCEMENT OF RABBIT LIVER MICROSOMAL LIPID PEROXIDATION BY PHOSPHOLIPIDS
The complete microsomal reaction mixtures contained 0.5 mg microsomal protein/ml, ADP-Fe3+ (3 mM ADP, 0.15 mM FeCI,) and
0.1 mM NADPH in 50 mM Tris-HCI, pH 7.5 at 37°C. Liposomes were made from extracted rabbit liver microsomal lipid and added
at the indicated lipid phosphate concentrations. Incubation and assay conditions are described in Materials and Methods. Values are
nmol/min per mg.
Conditions Malondialdehyde
Complete, - NADPH 0.15
Complete 1.14
Complete, + liposomes (0.2 pmol/ml) 1.64 Complete, + liposomes (0.5 ~mol/ml) 1.97
Lipid hydroperoxides
0.6
6.2
9.1 11.4
8
mixture resulted in a 44 and 46% increase in the
rate of malondialdehyde and lipid hydroperoxide
formation, respectively. The addition of liposomes
yielding a final concentration of 0.5 pmol lipid
phosphate/ml caused a 74% increase in the rate of
malondialdehyde formation and an 83% increase in the rate of lipid hydroperoxide formation.
Discussion
Previous studies have shown that rabbit liver
microsomes do not catalyze lipid proxidation read-
ily, in comparison to rat liver microsomes [ 16-181.
This present study confirms the previous reports
and shows that the lower rates of lipid peroxida-
tion, when compared to rat liver microsomes, are
not attributable to differences in incubation condi-
tions. Some investigators have attributed the dif-
ferences in rates to the presence of endogenous
antioxidants or inhibitors in rabbit liver mi-
crosomes rather than to a lower specific activity of
NADPH-cytochrome P-450 reductase [ 181. Our
results obtained from a comparative study of six
different preparations of rat liver microsomes with
six preparations of rabbit liver microsomes also
showed that the lower rate of lipid peroxidation
observed for rabbit liver microsomes is not due to
the specific activity of the reductase. It is also
unlikely that the lower rates of peroxidation are
due to antioxidants or other inhibitors since the
addition of rabbit microsomal lipid did not inhibit
the rate of lipid peroxidation of isolated rat micro-
somal lipid catalyzed by rat microsomal reductase.
Low concentrations of rat microsomal lipid (1 pmol
lipid phosphate/ml) were required to produce maximal rates of lipid peroxidation in a system
reconstituted with rat microsomal reductase. In-
creasing rat liver microsomal lipid concentration beyond 1 pmol lipid phosphate/ml did not result
in a significant increase in the rate of lipid per- oxidation. However, increasing rabbit liver micro- somal lipid concentration from 0 to 6pmol lipid phosphate/ml resulted in a linear increase in the rate of lipid peroxidation. This suggests that rabbit
microsomal lipid is not as susceptible to peroxida- tion as rat microsomal lipid.
Gas-liquid chromatographic analysis of the fatty acid composition of microsomal phospholipids re- vealed that rat liver microsomes are enriched in
the polyunsaturated fatty acids, arachidonic and
docosahexaenoic. Rabbit liver microsomes were
found devoid of docosahexaenoic acid, contained
a lower percentage (w/w) of arachidonic acid, and
were enriched in linoleic acid. These analyses also
revealed that the fatty acid content (mg fatty
acid/mg protein) of rabbit liver microsomes were
not significantly different from rabbit liver micro-
somes. These differences in the fatty acid composi-
tion may have two possible effects on lipid per-
oxidation: (1) The rate of initiation may be lower
in rabbit liver microsomes due to lower availability
of polyunsaturated fatty acids. (2) The rate of
chain propagation reactions may be enhanced
when the unsaturated centers of fatty acids are in
close proximity [27]. This configuration may maxi-
mize the possibility of chain reactions. Due to the
greater polyunsaturated fatty acid content, such
might be the case with rat liver microsomes to a
greater degree than with rabbit liver microsomes.
The work of May and McCay [28] with micro-
somal lipid peroxidation demonstrated that the
increased unsaturation of a fatty acid rendered it more susceptible to peroxidation. Our results with both rat and rabbit liver microsomal lipid per-
oxidation are in accord with this observation.
Within 15 min after initiation, 70% of the docosahexenoic acid was lost from the rat liver
microsomal reaction mixture, as well as over 50%
of the arachidonic acid. In the rabbit liver micro-
somal reaction mixture, over 30% of the
arachidonic acid and 15% of the linoleic acid were
lost during this time span. The saturated fatty
acids were not significantly altered in either sys- tem.
Increasing the concentration of polyunsaturated
lipid in the rabbit liver microsomal reaction mix-
ture by the addition of extracted microsomal lipid increased the rate of lipid peroxidation. These
results suggest that the availability of polyun- saturated fatty acids is the rate-limiting step in rabbit liver microsomal lipid peroxidation. Fur- thermore, they indicate that the deleterious effects of lipid peroxidation to membrane-bound proteins and other cellular components may be controlled by the degree of membrane phospholipid un- saturation, in addition to the presence of cellular antioxidants [29], superoxide dismutase [30], cata- lase [31] and other protective enzy-mes [32].
Acknowledgements
Dr. John Bucher is thanked for his assistance during the writing of this manuscript. We would
also like to thank Mrs. Cathy Custer for the pre-
paration of this manuscript. Supported by NSF
Grant Number PCM 79-15328, Michigan Agri-
cultural Experiment Station Journal Article Num-
ber 10135.
References
1 Wills, E.D. (1969) Biochem. J. 113, 315-324
2 Wills, E.D. (1969) Biochem. J. 113, 325-332
3 Beloff-Chain, A., Catanzaro, R. and Serlupi-Crescenzi. G.
(1973) Nature 198, 351-354
4
5
6
7
8
Hochstein, P., Nordenbrand, K. and Ernster, L. (1964)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 14, 323-328
May, H.E. and McCay, P.B. (1968) J. Biol. Chem. 243,
2288-2295
Poyer, J.L. and McCay, P.B. (1971) J. Biol. Chem. 246,
263-269
Hochstein, P. and Ernster, L. (1963) Biochem. Biophys.
Res. Commun. 12, 388-394
Beloff-Chain, A., Serlupi-Crescenzi, G., Cantanzaro, R..
Venettacci, D. and Balliano, M. (1965) Biochim. Biophys.
Acta 97, 416-421
Pederson, T.C. and Aust, S.D. (1972) B&him. Biophys.
Res. Commun. 48, 789-795
Pederson, T.C., Buege, J.A. and Aust, SD. (1973) J. Biol.
Chem. 248, 7134-7141
Hirokata, Y., Shigematsu, A. and Omura, T. (1978) J.
Biochem. 83. 431-440
Svingen, B.A., Buege, J.A., O’Neal, F.O. and Aust, SD.
(1979) J. Biol. Chem. 254, 5892-5899
Lai, C.-S. and Piette, L.H. (1978) Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
190, 27-38
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
9
Lai, C.-S. and Piette, L.H. (1977) Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Comm. 78, 51-59
Chhabra, R.S., Pohl, R.J. and Fouts, J.R. (1974) Drug
Metab. Dispos. 2, 443-447
Levin, W., Lu, A.Y.H., Jacobson, M., Kuntzman, R., Poyer,
J.L. and McCay, P.B. (1973) Arch. B&hem. Biophys. 158,
842-852
Gram, T.E. and Fouts, J.R. (1966) Arch. Biochem. 114,
331-335
Mishin, V.M., Pospelova, L.N., Pokrovsky, A.G. and
Lyakhovich, V.V. (1976) FEBS Lett. 62, 136-138
Folch, J., Lees, M. and Sloane-Stanley, G.H. (1957) J. Biol.
Chem. 226,497-509
Buege, J.A. and Aust, SD. (1978) Methods Enzymol. LII,
302-310
Svingen, B.A., O’Neal, F.O. and Aust, S.D. (1978) Photo-
them. Photobiol. 28, 803-809
Morrison, W.R. and Smith, L.M. (1964) J. Lipid Res. 4,
600-615
Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L. and Randall,
R.J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275
Bartlett, G.R. (1959) J. Biol. Chem. 234, 466-468
Omura, T. and Sato, R. (1964) J. Biol. Chem. 239,2370-2378
Tien, M., Svingen, B.A. and Aust, S.D. (1981) Fed. Proc.
40, 179-182
Porter, W.L., Levasseur, L.A. and Henick, A.S. (1972)
Lipids 7. 699-709
May, H.E. and McCay, P.B. (1968) J. Biol. Chem. 243,
2296-2305
Uri, N. (1961) in Autoxidation and Antioxidants (Lund-
berg, W.O., ed.), Vol. I, 133, Wiley Interscience, New York
30 McCord, J.M. and Fridovich, I. (1968) J. Biol. Chem. 243,
5753-5760
31 Sies, H., Gerstenecker, C., Menzel, H. and Flohe, L. (1972)
FEBS Lett. 27, 171-175
32 Christophersen, B.O. (1968) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 164,
35-46