protecting fiduciaries: insurance, erisa bonding, and more › assets › img › pdfs › web...fee...

20
Protecting Fiduciaries: Insurance, ERISA Bonding, and More

Upload: others

Post on 28-Jun-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Protecting Fiduciaries: Insurance, ERISA Bonding, and More › assets › img › pdfs › WEB...Fee Litigation Craze (continued) •Complaint •Record keeping fees too high for the

Protecting Fiduciaries: Insurance, ERISA Bonding, and More

Page 2: Protecting Fiduciaries: Insurance, ERISA Bonding, and More › assets › img › pdfs › WEB...Fee Litigation Craze (continued) •Complaint •Record keeping fees too high for the

General – Fiduciary Liability Insurance and ERISA Bond

• Fiduciary Liability Insurance Coverage

• Fidelity Bond Coverage

Page 3: Protecting Fiduciaries: Insurance, ERISA Bonding, and More › assets › img › pdfs › WEB...Fee Litigation Craze (continued) •Complaint •Record keeping fees too high for the

ERISA Lawsuits*

•6,700 lawsuits filed under ERISA

•Top 10 ERISA settlements in 2017 totaled $927.8 million

•Highest rate in class action certifications – 77% of claims were certified

as actions

•15 – excessive fee cases were settled* Seyfarth Shaw, Workplace Class Action Litigation Report

3

Page 4: Protecting Fiduciaries: Insurance, ERISA Bonding, and More › assets › img › pdfs › WEB...Fee Litigation Craze (continued) •Complaint •Record keeping fees too high for the

DOL 2017 Activity

• EBSA restored over $1.1 Billion to Employee Benefit Plans• Enforcement (investigations) - $682.3 Million•VFCP - $10 Million•Participant Complaints - $418.7 Million•Abandoned Plan Program - $27.9 Million

•Civil Investigations•1,707 cases- 1,114 resulting in monetary results (65.3%)• Litigation referrals - 134; Cases filed - 50

•Criminal Investigations•79 cases closed with guilty pleas/convictions•113 Individuals indicted

4

Page 5: Protecting Fiduciaries: Insurance, ERISA Bonding, and More › assets › img › pdfs › WEB...Fee Litigation Craze (continued) •Complaint •Record keeping fees too high for the

ERISA - Basics

•Who is a fiduciary?•ERISA 3(21); de facto fiduciaries

•Fiduciary Duties – ERISA 404•Eye single to Participants & Beneficiaries•Diversification•Prudence•Follow plan documents, unless contrary to ERISA

5

Page 6: Protecting Fiduciaries: Insurance, ERISA Bonding, and More › assets › img › pdfs › WEB...Fee Litigation Craze (continued) •Complaint •Record keeping fees too high for the

ERISA Basics (continued)

•Prohibited Transactions – ERISA 406• (a) Violations – Plan and Party-In-Interest • Furnishing goods or services• Extension of credit or loans

• (b) Violations – Fiduciaries• Self-dealing•Kickbacks

• Exemptions – ERISA 408•Contract or arrangement is reasonable • Services are necessary for the establishment or operation of the Plan•No more than reasonable compensation is paid for services

6

Page 7: Protecting Fiduciaries: Insurance, ERISA Bonding, and More › assets › img › pdfs › WEB...Fee Litigation Craze (continued) •Complaint •Record keeping fees too high for the

Fiduciary Liability Insurance – Why do you need it?

•ERISA 409 – personal liability

• Increase: lawsuits, plaintiffs’ bar, government investigations

•Defense of lawsuits extremely expensive

•No coverage under other policies (D&O, EPL, GL, etc.)

7

Page 8: Protecting Fiduciaries: Insurance, ERISA Bonding, and More › assets › img › pdfs › WEB...Fee Litigation Craze (continued) •Complaint •Record keeping fees too high for the

Who’s Covered?

•Definition of “Insured”• “Insured Person” – past, present, future directors, officers, and

employees of the sponsoring organization in their capacity as fiduciaries, administrators or trustees of a covered plan• Sponsor organization and its subsidiaries• Sponsored plans

•Who is not Insured• Third party service providers• Independent contractors

8

Page 9: Protecting Fiduciaries: Insurance, ERISA Bonding, and More › assets › img › pdfs › WEB...Fee Litigation Craze (continued) •Complaint •Record keeping fees too high for the

Key Policy Provisions

• “Insuring Agreement”

• Pay losses on account of any claims made during the Policy Period as a result of any wrongful act committed by any Insured.

• “Claim”

•Written demand for monetary or non-monetary damages

• Lawsuit or arbitration

• Formal regulatory or criminal proceeding

• Informal or Fact-Finding Investigation and Benefit Claim Denial

• “Wrongful Act”

•Breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA

•Negligent act, error or omission by an Insured in Administration of a Plan

• “Settlor” Coverage (e.g. establishing, amending, funding, or terminating a Plan)

9

Page 10: Protecting Fiduciaries: Insurance, ERISA Bonding, and More › assets › img › pdfs › WEB...Fee Litigation Craze (continued) •Complaint •Record keeping fees too high for the

Key Policy Provisions (continued)

• “Loss” – damages, judgments, settlements and defense costs; certain civil penalties (502(l), (i), or (c))

• “Defense Costs” – duty to defend

• “Exclusions” •Benefits due •Prior/pending litigation•Claims noticed to a prior carrier• Items covered by other insurance (property, GL, EPL, etc.)• Fraud/profit •Breach of contract

10

Page 11: Protecting Fiduciaries: Insurance, ERISA Bonding, and More › assets › img › pdfs › WEB...Fee Litigation Craze (continued) •Complaint •Record keeping fees too high for the

Triggering the Policy

•Notice Requirements•Failure to provide timely notice – no coverage•Various scenarios:•Demand letter (pre-litigation)•Complaint•DOL “Investigation” •ERISA 510 claim (notice to EPL but fail to notice Fiduciary Policy

or vice-versa)

11

Page 12: Protecting Fiduciaries: Insurance, ERISA Bonding, and More › assets › img › pdfs › WEB...Fee Litigation Craze (continued) •Complaint •Record keeping fees too high for the

Fee Litigation Craze

•Plaintiffs’ Bar Interest• Smaller plans now exposed•Recruiting Plan participants•Demand for plan documents• “instrument under which the plan is established or operated”•Minutes?

•Tibble v. Edison•Ongoing duty to monitor the the prudence of plan investments

12

Page 13: Protecting Fiduciaries: Insurance, ERISA Bonding, and More › assets › img › pdfs › WEB...Fee Litigation Craze (continued) •Complaint •Record keeping fees too high for the

Fee Litigation Craze (continued)

•Complaint•Record keeping fees too high for the size of the plan•Fiduciaries failed to have RFPs to ensure reasonableness•George v. Kraft Foods (7th Cir. 2011)•An independent opinion is not a magic wand that a fiduciary

may simply waive over a transaction to ensure their responsibilities are fulfilled (citing to Donovan v. Cunningham)

•Record keepers paid through revenue sharing•Share of classes used more expensive than others

13

Page 14: Protecting Fiduciaries: Insurance, ERISA Bonding, and More › assets › img › pdfs › WEB...Fee Litigation Craze (continued) •Complaint •Record keeping fees too high for the

Fee Litigation Craze (continued)

• Settlements•American Airlines (N.D. Tex., 2017) - $22M•Northrop Grumman (C.D. CA., 2017) - $16.75M•Mass Mutual (D. Mass., 2016) - $30.9M•Novant Health (M.D. N.C., 2016) - $32M•Boeing (S.D. Ill., 2015) - $57M•Ameriprise (D. Minn., 2015) - $27.5M • Lockheed (S.D. Ill., 2015) - $62M

• Subsequent remedial measures?•Negotiating reductions in fees from IMs and record keepers

14

Page 15: Protecting Fiduciaries: Insurance, ERISA Bonding, and More › assets › img › pdfs › WEB...Fee Litigation Craze (continued) •Complaint •Record keeping fees too high for the

Policy Considerations

•How expensive? How much coverage is necessary?•Coverage limited or expansive (e.g. include settlor)•Number of participants and beneficiaries•Amount of plan assets•Deductible/Retention•Prior litigation or investigations•Tower of insurance (various carriers?)

15

Page 16: Protecting Fiduciaries: Insurance, ERISA Bonding, and More › assets › img › pdfs › WEB...Fee Litigation Craze (continued) •Complaint •Record keeping fees too high for the

Fidelity Bond

•ERISA 412 •REQUIRES every person who “handles” plan assets be bonded•Who has authority to sign checks, disburse funds?

•Purpose•To protect against misappropriation by persons handling plan assets

•Amount Required•Amount equal to 10% of a plan’s assets – max. required bond is $500,000 -

can purchase with plan assets• If include employer securities - $1M - can purchase with plan assets

•Exclusion for Cyber Crime?

16

Page 17: Protecting Fiduciaries: Insurance, ERISA Bonding, and More › assets › img › pdfs › WEB...Fee Litigation Craze (continued) •Complaint •Record keeping fees too high for the

Cyber Insurance

• Fiduciary duty to ensure participant information and plan assets are protected from cyber threats/crimes.

• ERISA Advisory Council:

•Data management - Protect and control data.

•Technology management – Maintain up to date technology.

• Service provider management – Perform due diligence on plan data security of service providers.

•People issues – Properly train and manage personnel.

•The Council advised to consider the following to manage cybersecurity:

•Develop a strategy

• Identify data and assess risks (how is data stored, controlled, accessed, and transmitted)

• Establish processes relating to testing and updating technology, training personnel, and managing third party risks.

•Available resources, cost, size, complexity and overall risk exposure must be taken into consideration.

•Have cybersecurity discussions with the service providers and review their current policies or procedures relating to data security

• Insurance – endorsement or separate stand alone policy

17

Page 18: Protecting Fiduciaries: Insurance, ERISA Bonding, and More › assets › img › pdfs › WEB...Fee Litigation Craze (continued) •Complaint •Record keeping fees too high for the

CONTACT USJose M. Jara

Partner, ERISA and Employee Benefits Practice Group Leader CKR Law LLP

1330 Avenue of the Americas, 14th FloorNew York, NY 10019Phone: (212) 259-7300Fax: (212) [email protected]

OUR LOCATIONS

AKRON | ATLANTA | BEIJING | CAPE TOWN | CLEVELAND | BRAZILDJIBOUTI | DUBAI | GUANGZHOU | HARTFORD | HONG KONG | JOHANNESBURGLONDON | LOS ANGELES | MIAMI | MEXICO CITY | MILAN | MOSCOW | NAPLESNEW YORK | ORLANDO | OSAKA | PARIS | SAN FRANCISCO | ROME | SEADOONESHANGHAI | TEL AVIV | TOKYO | TRINIDAD & TOBAGO | WASHINGTON, D.C.

Page 19: Protecting Fiduciaries: Insurance, ERISA Bonding, and More › assets › img › pdfs › WEB...Fee Litigation Craze (continued) •Complaint •Record keeping fees too high for the

CONTACT US

Rhonda PrussackHead of Fiduciary and Employment Practices LiabilityBerkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance85 Broad Street, 7th FloorNew York, NY USA 10004Office +1 917.960.2449Mobile +1 [email protected]

Page 20: Protecting Fiduciaries: Insurance, ERISA Bonding, and More › assets › img › pdfs › WEB...Fee Litigation Craze (continued) •Complaint •Record keeping fees too high for the

Legal Notice

CKR is a global platform of law firms and other entities working in strategic association or cooperation with CKR Law LLP, a California limited liability partnership registered in the United States of America.

Each law firm and other entity (each a “Global Member”) is a separate legal entity and no partnership was created or intended by any such association or cooperation. No Global Member accepts responsibility for the acts or omissions of another Global Member, except to the extent that this is agreed expressly in writing in the terms entered into between a client or other contracting party and the relevant Global Member. Legal responsibility for the provision of services to clients is defined in engagement terms entered

into between clients and the relevant Global Member and these should be relied upon in determining liability for the services provided.

References to “CKR Law”, “the law firm” and “legal practice” are to one or more of the Global Members or to one of their respective members or associations. Any reference to a “partner” means a partner, member, consultant, or employee with equivalent standing and qualifications with any Global Member. Any reference to a CKR “location” means

any CKR office or Global Member office within the CKR global platform.

Each Global Member provides legal services in particular jurisdictions and is subject to the laws and professional regulations of the particular state, country or countries in which it operates. While each Global Member will continue to preserve clients’ confidentiality and legal professional privilege, information will be exchanged with other Global

Members to check representations by other Global Members and for research, practice management, training and administrative purposes.

The content on this site is offered only as a public service to the web community and does not constitute solicitation or provision of legal advice. This site should not be used as a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney licensed or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. You should always consult a suitably qualified attorney regarding

any specific legal problem or matter. The comments and opinions expressed on this site are of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.

If you choose to email anyone through this site, do not include any confidential, secret or otherwise sensitive information concerning any potential or actual legal matter in the email transmission. Unsolicited emails do not create an attorney-client relationship and confidential or secret information included in such emails cannot be protected from

disclosure. The owners of and contributors to this site have no duty to keep confidential any information you provide them.

Given the nature of and speed with which online communications are developed, the opinions and thoughts posted to this site are of a casual nature and may change after further reflection. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or

guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.

This website may contain hyperlinks to other resources maintained by third parties on the Internet. These links are provided solely as a convenience to you to help you identify related information. Our reference to other resources is not meant to imply an approval, endorsement, affiliation, sponsorship or other relationship to the linked site or its

operator, contents, or trade names, logos, symbols, service marks or other intellectual property rights associated with the hyperlinks, citations or URLs we provide. This website does not incorporate or endorse any materials appearing in such linked sites by reference. CKR Law disclaims all liability in respect to any decisions or actions, or lack thereof

based on any or all of the contents of any third-party site.