problem & need statement
DESCRIPTION
Assessment of Soccer Referee Proficiency in Time-Sensitive Decision-Making Nathan Jones, Andrew Cann, Saud Almashhadi, Hina Popal System Engineering & Operations Research, George Mason University. Problem & Need Statement. Method of Analysis. Context. Analysis Part I: - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Problem & Need Statement
Results
Conclusions & Further Findings
Assessment of Soccer Referee Proficiency in Time-Sensitive Decision-MakingNathan Jones, Andrew Cann, Saud Almashhadi, Hina Popal
System Engineering & Operations Research, George Mason University
Method of Analysis
Junior level referees do not receive assessments for game flow understanding or fitness attributes
as predictors of call accuracy.
An assessment method is needed to evaluate junior referees based on fitness and/or game flow
understanding attributes.
# Design Alternatives Description Tests
1 Fitness TestA baseline fitness test equivalent to those administered to senior
refereesFitness
2 Game Flow Evaluation
Video performance assessments conducted by official assessors GFU
3 Combined Evaluation
Combination of first two evaluations
FitnessGFU
4 No Assessment Not conducting any referee evaluations (status quo) None
A two part analysis was conducted to determine alternative utilities:Utility is defined as the average call accuracy of the top 100 junior referees
identified using each alternative.Part I: A regression for call accuracy based on fitness and GFU developed using
a discrete event soccer game simulator.Part II: Utility of each alternative determined through a Monte Carlo analysis
using regression from part I.
Part I: Soccer Game SimulatorFitness and GFU range from 0
(worst possible) to 100 (best possible)
Simulation output regression analysis (R2 = 99.51):Call Accuracy (Fitness, GFU) = 0.713491 + 0.000923486
Fitness + 1.28791e-5 GFU - 6.4846e5 Fitness2 + 1.12504e-6 GFU2 + 1.26193e-6 Fitness3 - 6.75305e-9 Fitness4
Alternative Utility 95 % Utility Half-Width
Fitness Test 0.74926 0.00012Game Flow Evaluation 0.72693 0.00028
Combined Evaluation 0.74174 0.00021
No Assessment 0.72099 0.00004
Part II: Monte Carlo Analysis
“Fitness Test” dominates all other assessment based alternatives.
Fitness Test vs. No Assessment (status quo) Marginal CostFitness Test: $26,990
Marginal Utility Fitness Test:
0.028 Utility Improvement
It is not cost effective to implement fitness tests on junior referees.
Recommendation
Team combination and game flow have a significant impact
on referee call accuracy.
Further Findings I:Impact of Teams
Context
Referee Attributes Attribute Assessment Method
Fitness Fitness Test (senior referees only)
Call Decision Making (CDM) Written exam on rules (all referees)
Game Flow Understanding (GFU) Indirectly using on field assessment(senior referees only)
Further Findings II: RecommendationWhen evaluating referee quality based on
game performance, team combination must be considered as a potential confounding
variable in the analysis.
Referee Call Making Process Analysis Part I: Soccer Game Simulator
Simulation developed in Java