presentation sirchenko
TRANSCRIPT
Modelling Ordinal Data with Abundant andHeterogeneous Zero (Status Quo) Observations
Andrei Sirchenko1
National Research University — Higher School of EconomicsMoscow, Russia
May 21, 2016
1This paper is partially based on the research supported by a grant from the National Bank of Poland and a grant from the
EERC.
Andrei Sirchenko (HSE) 40th EERC workshop May 21, 2016 1 / 22
Modelling Status Quo Decisions in Monetary Policy
Andrei Sirchenko (HSE) 40th EERC workshop May 21, 2016 2 / 22
A phenomenon of zero inflationThe preponderance of zero observations is observed in many fields
visits to a doctor
tobacco consumption
disease lesions on plants
manufacturing defects
recreational demand
sexual behavior
fertility
insurance claims
Andrei Sirchenko (HSE) 40th EERC workshop May 21, 2016 3 / 22
Heterogeneity of zero observationsNumerous studies make a distinction between the different types of zeros
no medical appointments due to chance, doctor avoidance, lack ofinsurance, or medical costs
no children due to infertility or choice
no illness due to strong resistance or lack of infection
a “genuine nonuser” versus a “potential user”
Andrei Sirchenko (HSE) 40th EERC workshop May 21, 2016 4 / 22
Two-part zero-inflated modelsThe two latent decisions
Andrei Sirchenko (HSE) 40th EERC workshop May 21, 2016 5 / 22
"Ask not what you can do to the data butrather what the data can do for you."
—Zvi Griliches
Andrei Sirchenko (HSE) 40th EERC workshop May 21, 2016 6 / 22
Changes to policy interest ratesThe preponderance of no-change decisions
largercut
25 bpcut
nochange
25 bphike
largerhike
Fed 10/1982 10/2012 9% 11% 63% 13% 3%
ECB 01/1999 10/2012 6% 4% 79% 10% 1%
BoE 06/1997 10/2012 5% 9% 76% 10% 0%
NBP 03/1998 10/2012 14% 9% 66% 11% 0%
Change to policy rateCentralbank
Period
Andrei Sirchenko (HSE) 40th EERC workshop May 21, 2016 7 / 22
Policy rate of the BoEPolicy easing (E), maintaining (M) and tightening (T) periods
Andrei Sirchenko (HSE) 40th EERC workshop May 21, 2016 8 / 22
Policy rate of the ECBPolicy easing (E), maintaining (M) and tightening (T) periods
Andrei Sirchenko (HSE) 40th EERC workshop May 21, 2016 9 / 22
Policy rate of the NBPPolicy easing (E), maintaining (M) and tightening (T) periods
Andrei Sirchenko (HSE) 40th EERC workshop May 21, 2016 10 / 22
Policy rate decisionsin response to changes in inflation and economic situation
Andrei Sirchenko (HSE) 40th EERC workshop May 21, 2016 11 / 22
Policy rate decisionsin response to changes in inflation and economic situation
Andrei Sirchenko (HSE) 40th EERC workshop May 21, 2016 12 / 22
Policy rate decisionsin response to changes in inflation and economic situation
Andrei Sirchenko (HSE) 40th EERC workshop May 21, 2016 13 / 22
Policy decisionsin response to changes in inflation and economic situation
Andrei Sirchenko (HSE) 40th EERC workshop May 21, 2016 14 / 22
Policy decisionsin response to changes in inflation and economic situation
Andrei Sirchenko (HSE) 40th EERC workshop May 21, 2016 15 / 22
Cross-Nested Ordered Probit ModelThree latent regimes with endogenous switching
Andrei Sirchenko (HSE) 40th EERC workshop May 21, 2016 16 / 22
Cross-Nested Ordered Probit ModelA generalization of the NOP, MIOP and ACH models
Andrei Sirchenko (HSE) 40th EERC workshop May 21, 2016 17 / 22
Allowing for endogenous explanatory variables
Simple mimicing of the two-stage least squares estimation of linearmodels (i.e. inserting the fitted values from the reduced form in placeof the endogenous regressors in the structural equation) does notgenerally work for nonlinear models and often makes the endogeneitybias worse (Bhattacharya et al. 2006).
To accommodate continuous endogenous regressors in the CNOPframework I implement the control function approach (Smith andBlundell 1986, Rivers and Vuong 1988), which introduces residualsfrom the reduced form for the endogenous regressors into thestructural equation as controls for endogeneity.
Andrei Sirchenko (HSE) 40th EERC workshop May 21, 2016 18 / 22
Comparison of competing modelsCNOP model provides the more reasonable estimates of choice probabilities
Andrei Sirchenko (HSE) 40th EERC workshop May 21, 2016 19 / 22
Estimated probabilities of three policy regimes
Andrei Sirchenko (HSE) 40th EERC workshop May 21, 2016 20 / 22
Probabilities of latent regimes in different policy periods
Andrei Sirchenko (HSE) 40th EERC workshop May 21, 2016 21 / 22
Concluding remarks
"The model is often smarter than you are." —Paul Krugman
The proposed cross-nested ordered probit model is applicable in manysituations and can be applied to a variety of ordinal data sets(changes to consumption, prices, rankings, etc.) and survey responses(when the respondents are asked to indicate the negative, neutral orpositive attitude).
The model can be extended by relaxing the iid assumption among theerror terms.
Andrei Sirchenko (HSE) 40th EERC workshop May 21, 2016 22 / 22