preliminaryreport on acute gastro-intestinal illness

Click here to load reader

Post on 09-Dec-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents

0 download

Embed Size (px)

TRANSCRIPT

PreliminaryReport On Acute Gastro-Intestinal Illness (outbreak) at Deptsang Deptsang _____________________________________________________________________________
Tashi Pheljay1, Kencho Chopel,2 Tshering Jamtsho,3 and Tenzin4
____________________________________________________________________________
e. Result........................................................................................................................................... 4
1. Graph showing the No. of cases reported at Jomotsangkha BHU and their onset of Illness ...... 5
Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................... 8
Acknowledgement .......................................................................................................................... 9
Reference ........................................................................................................................................ 9
Page 1 of 11
Back Ground
Deptsang village, under Serthig Gewog is situated at an altitude of 1298 meters from the sea
level, which is approximately 15 Km drive from Gewog Centre and 38 Km from Jomotsangkha
Dungkhag. The Lauri Gewog Centre (GC) Road bypasses this village and has 33 Household
(HH) with 99 total populations, out of that 53 were male and 46 were female (AHH survey,
2016).
season not only for farming
activities, but also for their
labor contribution in
found that 79% of the
household were engaged in this construction and it represents 73% who consumed the carcasses
meat; the source of outbreak and 63 % of them were victims.
On 26 May 2016, the teams comprising the Gup of Serthig Gewog, Live Stock officer of Lauri
Gewog, Health Assistant of Mingjiwong BHU and the Dungkhag health sector have visited the
site to do comprehensive investigation. The investigation has extended to the place of carcass in
the forest above one and half
hours uphill walk. During this
investigation, the team did
other animals that mingles
dead was reported anywhere
in the locality nor any
symptom were reported. Moreover, the team has observed huge plastic sack (potato packing
Fig.(1). Temple under construction
Page 2 of 11
sack) with the remaining of stomach contains (waste product) which indicates that the cow might
be sick due to this in the stomach causing her to sudden death (Figure.3). On further assessment,
the team has found a trace of bear feaces, who supposedly has chomp through the carcass and
left out. No one is sure for the carcass being left there, even our team failed to ascertain the
number of days passed by, but the meat really has unpleasantly smelling even at 500 meters.
It was only on May 21, 2016
(Saturday), the owner of the cow
has claimed not only dead, but
also found devoured from anal
part into the internal organs
including the reproductive
of anything else, rather than to
take the remaining carcass at
home for consumption. As
though and planned, He (owner)
once again spotted to the site next day (Sunday), with few of his neighbor to carried out the
leftover carcass towards the temple for consumption during the ongoing construction and rest
were divided amongst themselves for home consumption.
As above, they had prepared meat for lunch at the temple construction on 22/05/16 (Sunday),
were 28 of them has had it and 36 of them had at their home during their dinner. As a result, 33
of them have developed symptoms and were ambulated to Jomotshangkha BHU-I, all were with
similar symptom of Nausea/vomiting, Headache, Fever, Abdominal discomfort/Cramps and
some with dehydration status. However, other 30 people who consumed the carcass meat did not
illustrate any symptoms and our finding from this investigation reveals that the meat was prepare
after thoroughly washing and properly cooked.
The Outbreak Control Team (OCT) with fore mention member have then carried out the
comprehensive investigation with effect from May 26, 2016.
Fig.(3). Waste product of cow with presence of plastic sack
Red & blue color plastic sack
Preliminary Report Gastrointestinal Illness (Outbreak) ____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 11
Objectives 1. To determine the etiological agent causing the Outbreak
2. To indentify the risk group
3. To identify the source of outbreak
4. To establish the control and preventive Measure
Methodology
a. Descriptive study
It was a veiled case control studies and defined the cases as, “any person, at any age, who
engaged in handling, or consumed meat at the temple, either at home, or exposed to the carcass
meat, Who later developed Nausea/vomiting, Headache, Fever, Abdominal discomfort and
Abdominal Cramps.” Control was any person within the locality who did not eat or consumed
the meat at temple, nor at home.
Trough this Dungkhag Administration, the team informed all the community of Deptsang village
to gathered at Temple and obtained their name list, personal contact history and meal history
(Fig. 2). Assessed for further active cases in the community or looked for any new cases. No new
cases were reported and those who were ambulated the day before to the BHU –I were also being
discharge with appropriate treatment and advised by the clinician. The three standard
epidemiological parameter of outbreak (People, Place and Time) is used for determine causal
relationship.
b. Laboratory study Stool sample from the active cases were collected for laboratory examination at Jomotsangkha
BHU and the same stool sample were send to Public Health Laboratory, Sarbithang for further
confirmation of result after CS examination.
Preliminary Report Gastrointestinal Illness (Outbreak) ____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 4 of 11
c. Environmental Assessment
On visiting the site on 26/05/16, the OCT has first assessed the Temple kitchen and found
cleaned. The tap stands, is within the vicinity of the kitchen and has continuous water supply.
They use firewood while preparing the meal for the labor, but no evidence of contaminations
observed. Although they did not have designated person as cook, but one who delegated as cook
by the community is healthy prior to this occurrence. We are also privilege to trip to respective
household, all the same did not observed any contributing factor in this episode, rather than from
the carcass meat that was flood almost in every household (26/33 HH) in the village.
d. Environmental Intervention In order to prevent from new
occurrences, we made to collects all
the remaining meat from every
household who had been stored as
dry meat (Shakams). Approximately
the open pit and then buried. The
containers and baskets were disinfected with Potassium permanganate solution (1ml: 1000ml)
and still were unpleasant smelling. The waste product at the site also collected, burnt, and then
disinfected with chlorine solution. Health education regarding the food safety and hygiene had
also communicated to the communities. They were repeatedly reinstated the important of
refraining from consuming such carcass meat of any kind in future.
d. Data analysis The collected data were analyzed, using the Microsoft excel and statistics we used were
frequency, Mean, Median, , Percentage, Rate, Odd ratio and relative risk.
e. Result Out of 99 total populations at Deptsang village, 33 people reported to have developed symptom
after ingestion of carcass meat on 22/5/16. Among them 64 % of the cases were male dominance
Fig.(4). Dry meat stored at home
Preliminary Report Gastrointestinal Illness (Outbreak) ____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 5 of 11
and rest 36% were female representative. It has grossly extend to the entire household 79%
(26/33 HH) and majorities were among the age bracket of 21 years to 50 years (51%) male and
(30%) female. Mean duration of illness was 2 + 0.1 SD. and overall attack rate due to
consumption of meat was 60% (30/50) all met our case definition.
According to CDC-EIS, (2003): Compendium of Acute food borne and Waterborne Diseases;
this typical outbreak met the food characteristic of the disease causing agent Escherichia coli,
which can cause Gastroenteritis. The clinical syndrome and incubation period is also very likely
of this (Deptsang) outbreak. However, we could not confine to probable causes of this outbreak,
due to lack of laboratory, facilities and expertise at this BHU, but this part will be confirmed
later from the PHL as have already been send the samples.
Nevertheless, the basic laboratory test from this BHU, have reported to have Entamoeba
Histolytica in 5 of the sample (71%) out of 7 samples tested. Ancyclostoma duodenale and
tapeworm eggs were other etiological agent found in the samples collected from those admitted
in the wards on 25/5/16. Entamoeba Histolytica is etiological agent of Protozoa causes
Amoebiasis (Amoebic dysentry), with similar symptoms of Deptsang outbreak, and is one of the
features of food borne disease causing Gastrointestinal Illness outbreaks in the communities
(WHO, 2008).
For that reason, the OCT discloses this outbreak as gastrointestinal illness due to presence of
Entamoeba Histolytica in the stool examination.
1. No. of cases reported at Jomotsangkha BHU and their onset of Illness
Preliminary Report Gastrointestinal Illness (Outbreak) ____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 6 of 11
2. Clinical manifestation of Acute Gastrointestinal illness in Percentage (%)
Table 1. (a). No. of People who had carcass meat at Temple only
Incidence of Exposure (Ie) to meat = a = 21 = 0. 9 (a+b) = 23 Incidence of unexposure (Iu) to meat = c = 5 = 0. 2 (c+d) = 26 Therefore, Relative Risk (RR) of ILL due to meat consumption is- Ie = 0.9 = 4.5 Iu = 0.2
31
22
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Preliminary Report Gastrointestinal Illness (Outbreak) ____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 7 of 11
Table. 1. (b) No of People who had carcass meat at Home
Incidence of Exposure (Ie) to meat= a = 9 = 0. 3 (a+b) = 27 Incidence of unexposed (Iu) to meat== c = 1 = 0. 02 (c+d) = 36 Therefore, Relative Risk (RR) of ILL due to meat consumption is- Ie = 0.3 = 15 Iu = 0.02 Those people who ate meat at the temple are 4.5 times higher at risk of getting ILL than those who did not ate meat at the temple. Similarly, People who consumed meat at home are 15 times at higher risk of getting the Illness, than those who did not take meat. This clearly illustrates that the carcass meat was the only source of this outbreak. Table. 1. (c) Total No. of who consumed carcass meat (Temple & Home)
Incidence of Exposure (Ie) to meat= a = 30 = 0. 6 (a+b) = 50 Incidence of unexposed (Iu) to meat== c = 6 = 0. 4 (c+d) = 14 Therefore, Relative Risk (RR) of Illness due to meat consumption is- Ie = 0.6 = 1.5 Iu = 0.4
Those who ate meat during the meal are 1.5 times higher at risk of acquiring this ILL than those who have not taken the meat. Meat found to be the attributing factor (20%) in this outbreak, with additional attributable fraction of 33.3%, indicating that the incidence of this illness would have reduced by 33.3% if meats were not served.
Preliminary Report Gastrointestinal Illness (Outbreak) ____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 8 of 11
Table 2. Two-by two tables for consumption of meat (Case Control)
Those who have not eaten meat neither at the temple, or at home were considered as control groups and those who have taken meats were considered as cases irrespective of their place of meal.
Odd ratio (OR) = (30x8) = 3.5 (23x3) Therefore, the odd ratio of 3.5 for the food (meat) can be interpreted as: the odds of having been exposed
to the contaminated food (meat) in those who developed the illness was 3.5 times that of people who did
not ate meat. This odds ratio means that there is strong association between being the case and
consumption of meat.
The communities of Deptsang village had suffered with gastrointestinal illness after consuming
the carcass meat of their neighbor. Out of 99 total populations, 33 of them had been reported
with similar syndrome and 15 were admitted. One among them was referred to CRRH, Gelephu
and rest were discharge the following day and no new cases were observed thereafter.
The stool examination at the Jomotsangkha BHU reveals the presence of Entamoeba Histolytica
that can cause gastrointestinal illness and outbreak. Carcass meat significantly found to be the
point source of this outbreak and the recall products burnt, then buried after disinfecting with
chlorine solution. Food safety handling and sanitation awareness were given to the gathering
during the outbreak investigation at Deptsang.
Preliminary Report Gastrointestinal Illness (Outbreak) ____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 9 of 11
Acknowledgement
The team would like to sincerely, thank Dasho Dungpa, Dungkhag administration Jomotsangkha
for support and rendering us the pool vehicle, without which this investigations would not
completed on time. The credit also goes to the People of Deptsang and Geog administration for
their crucial supports provided during the investigation.
Lastly but not the least, we express our gratitude to Dzongkhag Health Office Samdrup
Jongkhar, the GDMO and all staff who involved during this Outbreak for continue support,
which is indispensable part of an outbreak investigation and control measure.
Reference
1. CDC, (2003), Oswego- An outbreak of Gastrointestinal Illness following a Church Super; U.S
Department of Health and Human Services: Public Health Services.
2. WHO, (2008), Food borne Disease Outbreaks; Guidelines for investigation and Control;
World Health Organization,France.