predicted charging and discharging effectiveness of · pdf filepredicted charging and...

26
PREDICTED CHARGING AND DISCHARGING EFFECTIVENESS OF A LATENT HEAT ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM LINKED TO A SOLAR THERMAL COLLECTOR Philip C Eames Centre for Renewable Energy Systems Technology, Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Loughborough University, LE11 3TU, UK

Upload: lybao

Post on 29-Mar-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • PREDICTED CHARGING AND DISCHARGING

    EFFECTIVENESS OF A LATENT HEAT ENERGY

    STORAGE SYSTEM LINKED TO A SOLAR THERMAL

    COLLECTOR

    Philip C Eames

    Centre for Renewable Energy Systems Technology, Department of

    Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Loughborough University,

    LE11 3TU, UK

  • Latent Heat Energy Storage

    Large amounts of heat can be stored over a small temperature range

    High effective energy density can be realised if operation is close to phase change temperature

    Wide range of materials available with different phase change temperatures

    For efficient long term operation charging and discharging must occur in a cycle

    Effective heat transfer into the PCM material is essential

  • Two and three dimensional transient finite volume models with temperature dependant material properties have been developed to predict heat transfer to and from a PCM, with simulation of the progress of the phase transition front and the free convective heat transfer within the liquid phase.

    Phase change occurs over a preset temperature range.

    The model allows the enthalpy to be varied within the temperature of phase change to more accurately simulate real phase change behaviour.

    The solution domain for the energy equations encompasses the phase change material and its enclosing container, the solution domain for the momentum equations is limited to that in which liquid phase change material exists.

    The models employ variable time steps when rapid melting of the phase change material is taking place which enables a stable solution to the equations to be obtained.

    All equations are solved using the Bi-CGSTAB iterative equation solver allowing significantly larger systems of equations to be solved in a reasonable time when compared to that required for direct solution methods.

  • A schematic diagram of the proposed PCM thermal energy storage system .

  • A schematic of the modelled computational domain adopted for

    the PCM storage unit.

  • Store Charging Simulations

    Store dimensions 420mm wide by 500mm long 300mm high

    Fluid flow cross sectional area is 0.02m2,

    fluid flow velocity 0.0011ms-1 and 0.0022ms-1

    volume flow rate of 0.022 and 0.044 ls-1.

    2m2 area of solar collectors, efficiency intercept 0.65, collector heat loss coefficient of 2 Wm2K-1

    Incident solar radiation 800W/m2

    Temperature rise from solar collector inlet to outlet based on collector efficiency, incident radiation and flow rate.

    Initial store temperature 25C or 30 C

    Inlet fluid temperature to the store = outlet from collector

  • Material Thermal

    Conductivity

    Wm-1K-1

    Specific

    Heat

    Capacity

    Jkg-1K-1

    Density kgm-

    3

    Dynamic

    Viscosity

    Nsm-2

    PCM

    Solid

    0.19 1800 820 n/a

    PCM

    Transition

    0.19 62480 820 n/a

    PCM

    Liquid

    0.18 2400 820 0.026

    Insulation 0.04 2012 24 n/a

    Aluminiu

    m

    237 2702 903 n/a

    PCM transition temperature range is between 54 and 56C. When melting

    the PCM is assumed fluid above 56C and solid below this. When

    solidifying the PCM is assumed fluid above 54C and solid below this.

    PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS USED FOR SIMULATION OF THE PHASE

    CHANGE ENERGY STORAGE MODULE

  • Predicted isotherms for finned PCM modules for a

    fluid flow channel velocity of 0.0011ms-1.The

    fluid inlet temperature to the store was that

    predicted from a 2m2 solar collector exposed to

    800Wm2 solar radiation

  • t

    70

    65

    60

    55

    50

    45

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    Phase changematerial

    Fins

    Fluid inlet

    Fluid outlet

    Time = 60minutes

  • t

    70

    65

    60

    55

    50

    45

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    Phase changematerial

    Fins

    Fluid inlet

    Fluid outlet

    Time = 120minutes

  • t

    70

    65

    60

    55

    50

    45

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    Phase changematerial

    Fins

    Fluid inlet

    Fluid outlet

    Time = 180minutes

  • t

    70

    65

    60

    55

    50

    45

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    Phase changematerial

    Fins

    Fluid inlet

    Fluid outlet

    Time = 210minutes

  • The predicted change in inlet fluid temperature with time when

    charging a PCM module (p) with (f) and without fins (nf) and a

    water (w) filled module for flow channel velocities of 0.0011 and

    0.0022ms-1.

    Time (s)

    Flu

    idin

    let

    tem

    pe

    ratu

    reto

    sto

    re(C

    )

    5000 10000 15000

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    w 0.0011

    w 0.0022

    pnf 0.0011

    pnf 0.0022

    pf 0.0011

    pf2 0.0022

    Phase change

  • Store Discharging

    Fluid inlet velocity 0.0011 and 0.0022 ms-1

    Inlet fluid temperature constant 20C.

    Store initially at a uniform temperature of 60C,

    4C above the commencement of phase

    transition and 6C above solidification

  • Predicted isotherms at 10, 20, 30 and 60 minutes

    for finned PCM modules, initial module

    temperature was 60C with channel flow velocity

    of 0.0011ms-1 with a constant temperature of

    20C.

  • t

    60

    55

    50

    45

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    Phase changematerial

    Fins

    Fluid outlet

    Fluid inlet

    Time = 10minutes

  • t

    60

    55

    50

    45

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    Phase changematerial

    Fins

    Fluid outlet

    Fluid inlet

    Time = 20minutes

  • t

    60

    55

    50

    45

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    Phase changematerial

    Fins

    Fluid outlet

    Fluid inlet

    Time = 30minutes

  • t

    60

    55

    50

    45

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    Phase changematerial

    Fins

    Fluid outlet

    Fluid inlet

    Time = 60minutes

  • Predicted isotherms at 30 and 60 minutes for PCM

    modules without fins, initial module temperature

    was 60C with channel flow velocity of

    0.0011ms-1 with a constant temperature of 20C

  • t

    60

    55

    50

    45

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    Phase changematerial

    Fluid outlet

    Fluid inlet

    Time = 30minutes

  • t

    60

    55

    50

    45

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    Phase changematerial

    Fluid outlet

    Fluid inlet

    Time = 60minutes

  • Predicted isotherms at 30 and 60 minutes for water modules

    without fins, initial module temperature was 60C with channel

    flow velocity of 0.0011ms-1 with a constant temperature of 20C.

    t

    60

    55

    50

    45

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    Phase changematerial

    Fins

    Fluid outlet

    Fluid inlet

    Time = 30minutes

    t

    60

    55

    50

    45

    40

    35

    30

    25

    20

    Phase changematerial

    Fins

    Fluid outlet

    Fluid inlet

    Time = 60minutes

  • The variation of outlet temperature with time for channel flow velocities of

    0.0011 and 0.0022 ms-1 for water (w) and PCM (p) filled modules with (f)

    and without fins (nf). Predictions are shown for fluid inlet at 20C to the

    base of the store.

    Time (s)

    Te

    mp

    era

    ture

    (C)

    500 1000 1500 2000 25000

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    55

    60

    w 0.0011

    w 0.0022

    pnf 0.0011

    pnf 0.0022

    pf 0.0011

    pf 0.0022

  • Conclusions

    2 dimensional transient models have been developed for the prediction of phase change in enclosures with plate fins.

    Models allow temperature fields, phase transition front, fluid flow regime and energy storage to be determined.

    Optimum fin arrangements with regard to, spacing and thickness can be determined to give efficient charging /discharging while maintaining a high fraction of PCM

  • Conclusions

    The model was applied to simulate a phase change material filled module forming part of a thermal energy store in a domestic solar hot water system.

    Charging predictions indicate that if sized correctly the variable thermal capacity at different temperatures that a PCM module provides will allow more heat to be stored at higher more useful temperatures than a water store.

    When charging the inclusion of fins only aids charging marginally.

    When discharging the inclusion of fins allows heat to be more effectively transferred from the store to the heat transfer fluid, the fin system simulated transferring heat only slightly less quickly to the heat transfer fluid than for a water filled module while storing significantly more energy