polithink rationale
DESCRIPTION
Project by students Eureka Foong Yen Chew, Jaime McDonald, and Kurt Bauer in the Mass Media, Politics and Public Opinion course (MSCM 345) at Linfield College, fall 2012. Check out the PoliTHINK app at http://ibuildapp.com/app.php?370614,331134TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: PoliTHINK Rationale](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082702/5530e1f64a79596f2e8b4915/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
In a political campaign, candidates with any intent of winning must be able to
communicate their message to the masses. During the pre-television era, presidential candidates
like Harry Truman would walk 31,000 miles across America shaking hands and directly
encountering swarms of voters. The dawn of television has made that process simpler and more
efficient. Dwight D. Eisenhower, the first politician to utilize the television to propagate
campaign advertisements, made brief “Eisenhower Answers America” spots that successfully
rivaled democrat candidate Adlai Stevenson's half-hour speeches.1 As time progressed, political
commercials became more controversial, launching personal attacks on opponents and even
inducing the element of fear.
Over the past two months, our team has constructed PoliTHINK – a simple mobile
application for the Android platform that aims to be a useful, interactive guide for audiences to
critically evaluate recent televised political advertisements. The application includes sample
analyses and interpretations of advocacy, contrast and attack commercials sponsored by
presidential campaigns, Super PACs and independent parties. In addition, we have compiled a
simple guide to understanding the campaign process and analyzing advertising content for the
average media consumer. To enhance user experience, we have included functions that enable
one to view a fact-checking website, watch recent advertisements, participate in discussions
through Twitter and submit feedback, all without ever leaving the application.
We believe this application is necessary because advertisements have a profound impact
on public knowledge of policies and candidates as well as on public opinion. Advertisements can
1 Museum of the Moving Image (2012). 1952: Eisenhower vs. Stevenson. Retrieved November 19, 2012, from The Living Room Candidate Web site: http://www.livingroomcandidate.org/commercials/1952
![Page 2: PoliTHINK Rationale](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082702/5530e1f64a79596f2e8b4915/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
change voter opinion, bring up important issues and directly influence their views on candidates.2
In addition, many overlook the content of political advertising, when in reality campaign
commercials provide more information about policies than do most news stories.3 This view is
complemented by the work of Kaid and Holtz-Bacha (1995) and McClure and Patterson (1974),
which concluded that most political commercials address the issues of pertinence and provide
valuable information not typically available in traditional news sources.
The impact of these commercials, despite several studies that have shown little effect of
advertising on voting choices, remains at the heart of campaigns’ decisions to increase spending
on airtime. In this election season alone, presidential candidates Barack Obama and Mitt
Romney and their supporting outside groups spent a total of $984 million on television spots
across America, according to a tally by SMG-Delta.4 However, the presidential race is not the
only one affected by such vast spending. Exorbitant amounts of money have been poured into
senate advertising, causing controversy in states such as Montana where a recent “Frontline”
investigation revealed shady sources of funding for so-called independent issue advocacy
committees.5
The focus on broadcast commercials was intentionally chosen because television remains
an important source of election news despite the rising prominence of new media. Nearly 60% of
television news is devoted to the election, compared to 40% of the news hole in radio and 25% in
2 West, D. (2008). Advertising and Citizen Voting Behavior. In D. Graber, D. McQuail, & P. Norris, The Politics of News: The News of Politics (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.3 Graber, D. (2010). Mass Media and Politics. CQ Press.4 Nyczepir, D. (2012, November 12). Lessons from a nearly $1 billion TV campaign. Retrieved November 19, 2012, from Campaigns and Elections Web site: http://www.campaignsandelections.com/campaign-insider/342627/lessons-from-a-nearly-and361-billion-tv-campaign.thtml5 The Frontline investigation was referred to in Genzlinger, N. (2012, October 29). On Electoral Map, the Green is Obscured. The New York Times .
![Page 3: PoliTHINK Rationale](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082702/5530e1f64a79596f2e8b4915/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
newspapers.6 In addition, studies have shown that television and short video formats are far
better in persuading and conveying messages than either radio or newspaper. In a Mindshare
study conducted in October 2012, television was cited as the “most important media for deciding
which way to vote."7 Not only that, televised campaign advertisements often receive additional
coverage when they are covered by other news sources. For example, the “Peace, Little Girl”
advertisement released by the Lyndon Johnson campaign in 1964 was reported on by several
news outlets at the time, and still receives attention today. The reason these advertisements make
such good news stories is because of their essential features – they are high impact, super
compressed and consume minimal cost of coverage (Iyengar and Ansolabehere, 1997).
Besides that, there is a profound need for audiences to critically evaluate the stream of
political advertising. For one, Super PACs, or generously funded independent political action
committees, have changed the way election funding is now organized. Overby (2012) shows that
there is a significant increase in the effectiveness of Super PAC commercials in this election,
which are generally attack based. More recently during the vice presidential debate on October
11th 2012, moderator Martha Raddatz asked if either candidate was embarrassed on the negative
tone of the election. Joe Biden spoke for both of them, expressing his disdain of Super PACs.
In Green (2002), we are shown how not only is there a large share of people who can
benefit from critically evaluating the campaign advertisements, but also how our application can
potentially dispel the audience’s automatically negative, cynical perception and enlighten the
6 Graber, D. (2010). Mass Media and Politics. CQ Press. Figure 8-1 (p. 208)7 McClellan, S. (2012, October 17). Voters: TV Key to Political Choices. Retrieved October 31, 2012, from Media Post News: www.mediapost.com/publications/article/185430/voters-tv-key-to-political-choices.html#ixzz29f5A3x9
![Page 4: PoliTHINK Rationale](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082702/5530e1f64a79596f2e8b4915/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
audience on what is real.8 The survey Green and the Institute of Global Ethics conducted for the
Project of Campaign Conduct9 showed 55% of respondents feel most candidates deliberately
twist the truth. Additionally, more than half agreed that all or most candidates make unfair
personal attacks on their opponents. Dan Gilmor, the author of Mediactive, further asserts that
public cynicism towards advertising only feeds the problem, implying the need to seek the truth
and evaluate the statement before coming to a conclusion. Hence, the proposed application will
help the public evaluate advertisements rather than merely being cynical about them.
Another issue with political advertising is that although some may be informative, others
may also be uninformative, simply creating a more favorable image of the candidate, or an
unfavorable image of the opponent.10 In reality, they are specifically designed to win votes rather
than inform voters. Rowbottom (Autumn 2012) shows the rationale for controls on false
campaign speeches and the overall distortion of the election process.11 Rowbottom explains that
the laws are just too broad and it is easy to pass a falsification for an exaggeration.
The rationale behind constructing a mobile application, rather than a web application, is
that we are seeing a rapid shift towards the use of mobile applications. By 2014, the International
Data Corporation predicts that the number of application downloads worldwide will increase to
76.9 billion, from the 10.9 billion in 2010.12 On top of that, a study conducted by Nielsen and
8 Green, J. (2002). The Dimensions of Disgust: Citizen Attitudes and Codes of Campaign Conduct. Camden: The
Institute of Global Ethics.9 Ibid. 10 Zhao, X., & Chaffee, S. (1995). Campaign Advertisements versus Television News as Sources of Political Issue. The Public Opinion Quarterly , 59 (1), 41-65.11 Rowbottom, J. (Autumn 2012). Lies, Manipulation and Elections - Controlling False Campaign Statements. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 507-535.
12 International Data Corporation. (2010, December 13). IDC Forecasts Worldwide Mobile Applications Revenues to Experience More than 60% Compound Annual Growth Through 2014. Retrieved October 31, 2012, from IDC Web
![Page 5: PoliTHINK Rationale](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082702/5530e1f64a79596f2e8b4915/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Yahoo in 2011 concluded that 86% of 8000 mobile phone owners between the ages of 13-64 use
the internet on their mobile devices while they watch the television. Of this figure, about one-
third were using mobile applications.13
While developing PoliTHINK, we were fully aware that we were not the first to create an
application analyzing the content of political advertising. Ad watch mini sites such as USA
Today’s Political Ad Tracker and The Washington Post’s Political Ads Database have actively
collaborated with fact-checking organizations to evaluate the truthfulness of campaign
commercials in this campaign. Similarly, the University of Wisconsin Advertising Project
(WiscAds) has taken advantage of the Campaign Media Analysis Group’s (CMAG)
advertisement monitoring technology to analyze commercials from as early as the 1998
campaign. More recently in August 2012, former students at Massachusetts Institute of
Technology developed the Super PAC App for iPhone that “listens” to political commercials on
television, matches the audio against a database and displays the commercial’s sponsors as well
as nonpartisan fact checks on its claims.14 Although our application may not be as
technologically advanced as the Super PAC App, it provides a wider view of advertisements as
well as a guide that they can use to make their own informed evaluations.
site: www.idc.com/about/viewpressrelease.jsp?containerld=prUS2261791013 Hodgkins, K. (2011, January 29). Nielson/Yahoo: 86% of Mobile Users Fire Up Their Phone While Watching TV. Retrieved October 31, 2012, from IntoMobile: www.intomobile.com/2011/01/29/nielsenyahoo-86-of-mobile-users-fire-up-their-phone-while-watching-tv/14 Sutter, J. (2012, August 22). 'Super PAC App' Knows When Political Ads Stretch the Truth. Retrieved October 31, 2012, from CNN Web site: www.cnn.com/2012/08/22/tech/mobile/super-pac-app-campaign/index.html
![Page 6: PoliTHINK Rationale](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082702/5530e1f64a79596f2e8b4915/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
In conclusion, a project that not only analyzes political advertisements, but guides the
public on how to do so, is needed for this and coming elections. The rise of television
commercials for campaigns has risen steadily through the election years. The majority of people
who watch these advertisements feel that the candidate is either not telling the truth or is making
an unfair attack on their competitor. In short, we believe PoliTHINK will help guide the public in
evaluating the content of political commercials for themselves and became active participants as
the prime audience of these efforts.
![Page 7: PoliTHINK Rationale](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022082702/5530e1f64a79596f2e8b4915/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
References:
Genzlinger, N. (2012, October 29). On Electoral Map, the Green is Obscured. The New YorkTimes .
Graber, D. (2010). Mass Media and Politics. CQ Press.
Green, J. (2002). The Dimensions of Disgust: Citizen Attitudes and Codes of Campaign Conduct. Camden: The Institute of Global Ethics.
Hodgkins, K. (2011, January 29). Nielson/Yahoo: 86% of Mobile Users Fire Up Their PhoneWhile Watching TV. Retrieved October 31, 2012, from IntoMobile:www.intomobile.com/2011/01/29/nielsenyahoo-86-of-mobile-users-fire-up-their-phonewhile-watching-tv/
International Data Corporation. (2010, December 13). IDC Forecasts Worldwide MobileApplications Revenues to Experience More than 60% Compound Annual GrowthThrough 2014. Retrieved October 31, 2012, from IDC Web site:www.idc.com/about/viewpressrelease.jsp?containerld=prUS22617910
McClellan, S. (2012, October 17). Voters: TV Key to Political Choices. Retrieved October 31,2012, from Media Post News: www.mediapost.com/publications/article/185430/voterstv-key-to-political-choices.html#ixzz29f5A3x9
Nyczepir, D. (2012, November 12). Lessons from a nearly $1 billion TV campaign. RetrievedNovember 19, 2012, from Campaigns and Elections Web site:http://www.campaignsandelections.com/campaigninsider/342627/lessons-from-a-nearlyand361-billion-tv-campaign.thtml
Rowbottom, J. (Autumn 2012). Lies, Manipulation and Elections - Controlling False CampaignStatements. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 507-535.
Sutter, J. (2012, August 22). 'Supr Pac App' Knows When Political Ads Stretch the Truth.Retrieved October 31, 2012, from CNN Web site:www.cnn.com/2012/08/22/tech/mobile/super-pac-app-campaign/index.html
West, D. (2008). Advertising and Citizen Voting Behavior. In D. Graber, D. McQuail, & P.Norris, The Politics of News: The News of Politics (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: CQPress.
Yadron, D., & Schatz, A. (2012, August 7). Political Ads: How Much is Too Much? RetrievedOctober 31, 2012, from The Wall Street Journal Online:online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443517104577573580726721396.html
Zhao, X., & Chaffee, S. (1995). Campaign Advertisements versus Television News as Sources ofPolitical Issue. The Public Opinion Quarterly , 59 (1), 41-65.