pmgsy presentation

7/27/2019 PMGSY Presentation

1/41

Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana(PMGSY)

including

Bharat Nirman(Rural Connectivity)

A Presentation

beforeHonble Minister, Rural Development

13th July 2011


2/41

2

NH

2%

SH & MDRs

14%

Rural Roads

84%

Total length of road network in India : 32 Lakh km

National Highways (NH) : 65,600 Km (2.05%)

State Highways & Major District Roads (SH & MDRs) : 4,32,000 Km (13.5%)

Rural Roads : 27 Lakh Km (84.4%)

80 % of Rural Roads unsurfaced

3.42 lakh habitations (39%) out of 8.88 lakh rural habitations lacked all-weather connectivity

in the year 2000.

Status of Road Network in India


3/41

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00

CUMULATIVE STATES(Starting the least % Connected in 2K as well as in May 2011)

Graph May 2011 - LORENZ CURVES 2 K and May 2011- PMGSY(BASED ON STATE WISE % of HABITATIONS CONNECTED)

Bliss

2K

May-2011

Gini Coefficient

2K0.214

Gini CoefficientMay 20110.158


4/41

4

PMGSY Programme Objective

Providing all weather connectivity to allhabitations having population of 500 or more inplain areas and all habitations having population

of 250 or more in Hill States, Tribal (Schedule-V),Desert (as identified in DDP) areas and the 60LWE affected/ IAP districts.

To upgrade some eligible existing through routesand major rural link routes to ensure full farm tomarket connectivity.


5/41

Connectivity StatusCore States

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

160,000

180,000

Total Habitations

Connected in 2K

Connected by May 11

Sanctioned (incl 2Kconnected)up to May 11

PMGSY Target


6/41

Connectivity Status Initially highlyConnected States

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

Total Habitations

Connected in 2K

Connected in May11

Sanctioned (incl2K connected) upto May 11PMGSY Target


7/41

Connectivity Status Hilly States

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

Total Habitations

Connected in 2K

Connected in May 11

Sanctioned (incl 2Kconnected) up toMay 11

PMGSY Target


8/41

Bharat Nirman (RC) and PMGSY

Bharat Nirman Habitations withpopulation of 1,000 or more[500 or more in specialareas]

PMGSY Habitations withpopulation of 500 or more[250 or more in special areas]


9/41

9

Bharat Nirman

Rural roads a major component of Bharat Nirman for augmentingrural infrastructure launched in Feb 2005.

Aims to provide connectivity to habitations of population of 1000+.Eligibility for Hill States, Tribal (Schedule-V) areas being above

500.

To cover 54,648 unconnected habitations involving 1.46 lakhs km ofnew roads.

To upgrade/renew 1.94 lakhs km of Through Routes to ensure farmto market connectivity. Estimated investment Rs. 48,000 Cr (2003-04 prices) Original time frame - March 2009 Revised time frame - March 2012


10/41

Progress underBharat Nirman (Rural Roads Component)

Length in

km


11/41

11

PMGSY (including BN) Current Implementation Status

Total Eligible Projects

Cleared(Sanctioned)

Completed

upto May11Balance

Habitations

(in Nos.)

Net 1,36,451

(Original 1,68,268

minus the connected under other Schemesor non-feasible)

1,09,010

(80%)

78,951

(59%)

NewConnectivity

(km.)

3,65,094 2,56,425

(70%)

1,94,454

(53%)

Upgradation

(km.)

3,74,844

2,24,900 (UG per se by GOI)

1,49,944 Renewal

1,64,096

(73%)

1,31,234

(58%)

B. Financial ( in Rs. Crore)Value of projects

clearedFunds Released

Upto May2011

Expenditure Addl. Funds reqd. (to completeongoing projects in this Plan)

1,18,950 87,807 82,691 31,143

(+NABARD debt serviceliability)

A. Physical


12/41

Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana(Length Targets and Achievements)

Sl. No. Name the State

New Connectivity Upgradation

Target (TotalLength to be

covered under

PMGSY

Achievement

(upto March 11)

Target

(Upgradationunder PMGSY

(60% of

Upgradation

Length)

Achievement

(Upto March 11)

1 Andhra Pradesh 3326 3373.95 10321 15801.62

2 Arunachal Pradesh 6095 2924.27 2512 1.67

3 Assam 14571 10091.06 7828 16.204 Bihar 33544 7957.99 11149 4278.36

5 Chhattisgarh 37556 15895.04 10135 2513.48

6 Goa 40 1.87 114 156.837 Gujarat 7453 3938.42 5449 3217.98

8 Haryana 26 2.00 4515 4294.08

9 Himachal Pradesh 12832 7141.30 5659 2123.07

10 Jammu & Kashmir 8412 1744.24 3522 139.91

11 Jharkhand 21445 5589.70 7457 572.55

12 Karnataka 500 500.78 10153 13181.37

13 Kerala 439 592.98 2631 680.82

14 Madhya Pradesh60264 33845.59 22342 12672.60

Length in km


13/41

Sl.No. Name the State

New Connectivity Upgradation

Target (Total Length to becovered under PMGSY Achievement(upto March 11)

Target (Upgradation

under PMGSY (60%of Upgradation

Length)

Achievement(Upto March 11)

15 Maharashtra 4654 3055.83 11834 15699.60

16 Manipur 2131 2116.00 1428 472.94

17 Meghalaya 2662 949.76 2208 15.00

18 Mizoram2021 1898.68 886 73.50

19 Nagaland 1789 1782.27 1023 857.71

20 Orissa 29374 15173.07 16996 4740.52

21 Punjab 979 820.13 6088 3542.47

22 Rajasthan 36472 33516.98 15670 14649.60

23 Sikkim 1107 955.11 508 1371.37

24 Tamil Nadu 4978 3348.55 13321 5747.1125 Tripura 2980 1728.74 1406 256.76

26 Uttar Pradesh 38600 18904.88 34244 20409.38

27 Uttaranchal 10429 3108.004134

304.01

28 West Bengal 22995 10007.06 11375 683.69

Total 367673 190964.24 224906 128474.20


14/41

14

Progress underBharat Nirman (Rural Roads Component)

Activity Target(2005-12)

Projects sanctioned Achievement upto May11 (against

target)

Habitations(in nos.)

54,648 53,570 40,364 (74%)

New Connectivity(length in km.)

1,46,185 1,41,864 1,28,446 (88%)

UpgradationRenewal (in km)

1,16,47877,653

(1,94,131)

1,18,409 97,6371,26,170

(as reported by

States)(2,23,807)

Work in Progress (against sanction)Habitations - 13,206 (25%)New connectivity - 13,418 km (9%)Up-gradation Length - 20,772 km (18%)

(1000+ in plain areas, 500+ in Eligible Hill & Tribal Areas)


15/41

Institutional Architecture

Ministry of Rural Development Nodal Deptt. State Govt.

NRRDA

(Management Support)

SRRDA including

PRIs(Programme Implementation)

STA/PTA(Project AppraisalSupport)

NQMs(Independent QualityMonitor)

PIU

NRRDA: National Rural Roads Development Ag ency, SRRDA: State Rural Road Developm ent

Agency,

STA: State Techn ical Agency, PTA: Prin cip al Techn ical Agency, NQM: National Quality Mon itor,

PIU: Programme Implementat ion Unit

SQMs(Independent QualityMonitor)

15


16/41

16

Accrual from Diesel Cess Rs. 5,550 crore (2011-12) Accrual from Diesel Cess largely committed for loan

repayment during 2011-12. Externally Aided Projects-

World Bank Project ($1.5 billion) was launched on 19th May

2011. Possibility of launching of one more ADB Project ($ 0.8 to

$1.2 billion). Limited Scope for further leveraging Diesel Cess to raise

additional NABARD loans

Key Issue: Financing of PMGSY. DEA should put ADB RRS-III P in firm category for

2011.

Sources of Funding PMGSY


17/41

S.

No.Item

Amount (in Rs. Crore)

at 2010-11 prices

1 Funds required for balance works yet to be sanctioned(new connectivity + upgradation) 80,000

2 Committed liability for completion of works already sanctioned 34,218

3 Impact of left out habitations(approx.) 8,000

4 NABARD loan - Principal 17,600

5 NABARD Loan - Interest 6,060

6 New habitations of 250+ LWE affected/IAP districts (approx.) 18,000

7 Missing Bridges (approx.) 8,000

8 Impact of increase in length in length of bridges to 75 m in IAP distts (approx.) 2,400

9 Impact due to snow fall/land slides (approx.) 5,000

10 Administrative Exp. Including for States, Quality monitoring etc. 1,000

Funds available during 2011-12 20,000

Requirement of funds to achieve PMGSY Targets


18/41

Need to Deepen Convergence WithMGNREGA

At present under MGNREGA the following workscan be covered:

Roads to connect habitations ineligible underPMGSY

Second or multi-connectivity to habitations

habitation - internal roads- other than PMGSY

Plantation along PMGSY roads.


19/41

Status of Core Network of Bihar

1. Inconsistencies noticed in the tentative Core Network sent by theGovt. of Bihar.

2. The State requested for permission for ground verification to finalizeand freeze the Core Network Data.

3. Sanction of Projects were made based on the tentative Core Network

and certification of eligibility by the State/ Nominated ExecutingAgencies(NEAs).4. The habitation details of the Core Network have been analyzed in

the presence of officers of RWD from all the districts andshortcomings found.

5. Verification of habitations of the roads sanctioned to the NEAs

(CPWD, IRCON, NBCC, NPCC and NHPC), involved on request ofthe State for implementation, is under process.

6. Meeting at the level of SRD scheduled for 21st July 2011.


20/41

20

Quality Assurance Mechanism

A Three Tier Quality Assurance Mechanism institutionalized. FirstTier is in-house quality control, Second (SQMs) and Third Tiers(NQMs) are independent monitoring.

Sustainable Quality achieved through effective interventions.

Quality Control at PIU linked to payment to contractors and stage

passing concept introduced. Independent monitoring at State level through structured

inspections. Outsourcing permitted.

Independent monitoring of quality at National level furtherrefined through close monitoring of action taken and evaluation of

performance of NQMs.

The Cost of works having non-rectifiable defects to be treated asinfructuous.


21/41

Sl.

No.

Item Awarded Grade

(S/U/SRI)1 Quality Control Arrangements (Lab)

2 Attention to Quality (maintenance of Records)

3 Geometrics

4 Earthwork and Sub-grade in Embankment/Cutting

5 Granular Sub-base

6 Base Course Non-Bituminous and Shoulders

7 Bituminous Surfacing

8 Shoulders

9 CD Works

10 Side Drains and Catch Water Drains

11 CC/Semi-Rigid Pavement and Associated Pucca Drains

12 Road Furniture and Markings.

Overall Grading

Inspection formats for NQMs


22/41

22

5%7%

16%

24%

15%

24%

17%

13%13%

4%

2% 3%

9%

12%

6%

23%

15% 16%17%

30%

23%

28%

22%

17%

14%13%

16%20%

7%11%

6% 7%

17%

29%

27%

24%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Jan'07-

June'07

July'07-

Dec'07

Jan'08-

June'08

July'08-

Dec'08

Jan'09-

June'09

July'09-

Dec'09

Jan'10-

June'10

July'10-

Dec'10

Jan'11-

May'11

Complete U Complete RU Ongoing U Ongoing RU

NQM Grading of Unsatisfactory Works -TrendsJanuary 07 to May11


23/41

Abstract of works for which expenditure treated as infructuous and

deducted from the Programme funds of the respective States

# States No. of Roads Length (Km)Cost

(Lakhs)

1 Chhattisgarh 6 15.5 394.55

2 Karnataka 2 5.43 170.043 Maharashtra 1 8 230.94

4 West Bengal 3 13.38 451.98

5 Andhra Pradesh 1 1.28 83.74

6 Assam 3 6.67 519.26

7 Gujrat 4 5.81 126.90

8 Jharkhand 1 4.47 112.63

9 Rajasthan 5 31.51 400.23

Total 26 92.05 2490.27

Cost of works having non-rectifiable defects


24/41


25/41

Special DispensationAccorded to LWE Affected Areas/IAP Districts

Keeping in view of demands for concerned States, about a yearback for upto 50 m length entire funds were being released fromthe Ministry (against 25 m length earlier). The limit has beenincreased to 75 meters.

It is not that bridges longer than 75 m are not covered, but cost onpro-rata basis is to be borne by the States. Causeways of all lengthsare funded by GOI.

Qualification criteria relaxed for Contractors. The minimum

tender package has been reduced to Rs. 50 lakh.

A sum of Rs. 2,000 crore was released to LWE/IAP Districts.


26/41

Recommendations on various issues related to the North East

States

S.

NItem Recommendations Submitted

1 Coverage of remaining Bharat

Nirman Works

All remaining eligible proposals be sent

by the States immediately.

2 Coverage of missed out bridges

on roads already sanctioned

under PMGSY

All remaining eligible proposals be sent

by the States immediately.

3 Sanctions of Stage-II works forsuch PMGSY roads for which

Stage I has already been

sanctioned.

All remaining eligible proposals be sentby the States immediately.


27/41


States-contd.

4 Inclusion or otherwise of CC

drain width and Parapet Wall

Width in the roadway width.

(i) The roadway width should be exclusive of

parapet and side drains.

(ii) Minimum roadway width should be 6 meters.

(iii) The width may be suitably increased on the

request of SRRDA as per DPRs at curves,

junctions etc. and road stretches facing heavysnowfall or land slides.

(iv) Reputed institute be awarded an R&D study

to suggest technological solutions especially

using local material to control landslides

in hilly areas. Convergence with MGNREGA to

check landslides be also evolved through this

study.


28/41


States-contd.

5 Higher costs due totransportation of

Cement, Bitumen,

Steel etc. and longer

leads.

To start with a pre-bid conference with CementManufacturers should be convened either at Delhi or Kolkata

in which States may project their annual requirement of

cement covering all schemes run by the Ministry of Rural

Development.

6 Relaxation of the

current norm of

population of 250

persons and above in

respect of Hill States

(i) The existing procedure of Hill States for connectivity to

habitations of population 250 and above in 2001 and

relaxations of path distance of 1.5km to form a cluster of

250+ as well as relaxation of 10 km path distance in

International Border blocks be continued.

(ii) To provide connectivity to the habitations of less than

250 population in 2001 even after availing the aforesaid

relaxations; existing convergence provision in

MGNREGA may be availed of by the States.


29/41


States-contd.

7 Relaxation of norms of 100% funding by

GoI for bridges of span up to 50 m by

covering bridges of span up to 150 m

under 100% GoI funding

Number of bridges of span:

(i) above 50 meters upto 60 meters and

(ii) above 60 meters be assessed by the

States with crude estimates of bridge wise

cost on PMGSY roads not yet cleared by

the Department.

8 GoI funding towards maintenance

to partially cover enormous

maintenance costs due to difficult

terrain

XIII Finance Commission funds be used

to supplement State funds.


30/41

Recommendations on various issues related to the North

East States-contd.

9 Financial assistance from

GoI for GIS applications and

digitization of Core Network

GIS interface is essential for Core

Network and the necessary

arrangement be evolved in consultation

with States. Department of Science &

Technology, Government of India bealso approached.

10 Switchover to e-tendering

in all NE States

All remaining States should switch over

to e-tendering by 31st

December, 2011.


31/41

PMGSY Some Recent Actions Taken

Uploading of quality Grading of items/sub items and photographs of

works inspected by SQMs:

PMGSY provides a three-tier quality monitoring mechanism

Under the second-tier, periodic inspections are required to be conducted by

independent State Quality Monitors (SQMs). Each PMGSY project is

expected to be inspected by the SQMs at least three times during the process of

execution

All the SQM inspection reports are to be mandatorily entered in OMMAS

along with at least 10 digital photographs

Measures to ensure Maintenance Funding of PMGSY roads by States

Release of Programme Funds has been made contingent upon crediting of

required funds to respective SRRDA for maintenance

31


32/41

PMGSY Some Recent Actions Taken (contd.)

Necessity of Consultation with Honble Members of Parliament for newproposals under PMGSY:

Incorporating the suggestions given by Honble Members of Parliament should be

an integral part of the preparation of Project Proposals

Necessity of a Transect walk :

Involvement of the local community in a transect walk can ensure suitable

alignment, sort out the issues of land availability etc.

In view of above, a circular has been issued stating that the Project Proposals

shall in future be accompanied with following documents:

Appropriate proof regarding the consultation with Honble Members of

Parliament

Minimum of ten photographs taken during Transect Walk

Minutes of meeting after the Transect Walk for each road

32


33/41

33

Major Institutional Interventions

PPP:

States being pursued to adopt PPP in rural roads on pilotbasis.

Models on deferred payment, i.e. Annuity basis beingexplored.

National Consultation planned in February

GIS:

GIS for mapping of core network on pilot basis. CDAC to provide technical support States to implement.

Independent Engineer:

Deployment of Independent Engineer to supplement thirdtier.


34/41

Hill Cutting in difficultterrain

Arunachal Pradesh


35/41

Bituminous LayerConstruction


36/41

Increased Market Access for Farmers

Maharashtra

Tamil Nadu

BiharGujarat


37/41

Improved Transport Services

Bihar

Assam

Gujarat

Andhra Prades


38/41

Improved Access

to Schools

Andhra Prades

Assam

KeralaKarnataka


39/41

Improved Access to Health Care

CreatingLivelihoods

Gujarat

KeralaKarnataka

Roads Built in Forest Areas


40/41

Roads Built in Forest Areas

MizoramNagaland

Orissa M P


41/41

pmgsy presentation

Documents