philippe hering [email protected] october 30, 2007 drive laser commissioning results and...

22
Philippe Hering [email protected] .edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe Hering October 30, 2007 Outline • New oscillator • Improvements of laser performances • New transport beam line • Beam stabilization and diagnostics for the transport beam line • More remote control

Post on 19-Dec-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Philippe Hering phering@slac.stanford.edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe

Philippe Hering

[email protected]

October 30, 2007

Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans

1

Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans

Philippe HeringOctober 30, 2007

Outline

• New oscillator

• Improvements of laser performances

• New transport beam line

• Beam stabilization and diagnostics for the transport beam line

• More remote control

Page 2: Philippe Hering phering@slac.stanford.edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe

Philippe Hering

[email protected]

October 30, 2007

Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans

2

Great Up Time!

20 weeks of commissioning

Three 8 hour downs – Hot swappable parts available now

One 3 hour down during a night shift

2 hours per week for locking problems

98% up time !

Page 3: Philippe Hering phering@slac.stanford.edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe

Philippe Hering

[email protected]

October 30, 2007

Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans

3

New master oscillator from Femtolasers

• Narrower bandwidth requested to have higher spectral intensity and get a better seeding in the Regen (before FWHM = 30 nm).

• Crystal is sealed in airtight cavity to avoid contamination (no more weekly cleaning, endurance test made during > 200 hours).

• Remote starting capability.

• One pump mirror is remote controlled with picomotors.

Page 4: Philippe Hering phering@slac.stanford.edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe

Philippe Hering

[email protected]

October 30, 2007

Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans

4

New Femtolock driver for the oscillator

• Oscillator is first locked to 119 MHz and then to 476 MHz : no more 476 MHz bucket ambiguity.

• Lock button added to be lock always on the same bucket.

• RF- locking loop and lock button can be run remotely.

Page 5: Philippe Hering phering@slac.stanford.edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe

Philippe Hering

[email protected]

October 30, 2007

Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans

5

Reconfiguration of the stretcher• Regarding the central wavelength of the Regen seeding beam.

• Grating and concave/convex mirrors reorientation.

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

740 745 750 755 760 765 770 775 780

Wavelength (nm)

Sp

ec

tru

m in

ten

sit

y (

a.u

.)

Stretcher output spectrumDazzler output spectrum

Central wavelength of the oscillator

Central wavelength of the Regen seeding

Bandwidth of the stretcher

Page 6: Philippe Hering phering@slac.stanford.edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe

Philippe Hering

[email protected]

October 30, 2007

Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans

6

New set-up of the Dazzler

DAZZLER• Single pass configuration (instead of two before).

• More accurate spectral shaping with the Dazzler.

• After further studies from the vendor (Fastlite), quadratic phase correction cannot be added in a big amount and so 4th and 6th orders are not possible.

Only spectrum filtering is accurate for our shaping purposes (FWHM < 4 nm).

Page 7: Philippe Hering phering@slac.stanford.edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe

Philippe Hering

[email protected]

October 30, 2007

Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans

7

• Pulse shaping with the Dazzler is made with the spectral filtering parameters : we fix the central wavelength of the Regen seeding beam and shape the spectrum with a 3rd order super-Gaussian. A “hole” in the spectrum can also be done to compensate spectrum distortions in the amplifiers.

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

1.1

754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762

Wavelength (nm)

Sp

ecrt

um

Inte

nsi

ty (

a.u

.)

Super Gaussian Order 3

FWHM = 2 nm

Page 8: Philippe Hering phering@slac.stanford.edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe

Philippe Hering

[email protected]

October 30, 2007

Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans

8

Change in the REGEN cavity amplifier

• The Lyot filter (wavelength tuning element) has been removed.

• One of the end cavity mirror has been changed with an “edge” mirror : low pass filter coating cutting at ~750 nm.

• Remark : remaining modulations are coming from the fibered input of the spectrometer.

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762

Wavelength (nm)

Sp

ectr

um

in

ten

sity

(a.

u)

Regen output spectrum with the new Dazzler set-up and edge mirror

Dazzler output (Regen seeding)

Page 9: Philippe Hering phering@slac.stanford.edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe

Philippe Hering

[email protected]

October 30, 2007

Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans

9

Improvement of the temporal shape of the pulse

• Ps pulse duration is obtained by adding quadratic phase with the compressor (distance between gratings shorter than full compression).

• Super-Gaussian temporal profile is obtained with the Dazzler but only with spectrum shaping (no more with phase orders).

•You can also dig a “hole” in the spectrum to compensate the spectrum red shift in the multipass amplifiers after the Regen.

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

11000

12000

754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762

Wavelength (nm)

Sp

ec

tru

m I

nte

ns

ity

(a

.u.)

Compressor output spectrumwith Dazzler hole OFF

FWHM = 2 nm

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

11000

754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762

Wavelength (nm)

Spec

trum

inte

nsi

ty (a.

u.)

Compressor ouptut spectrumwith Dazzler hole ON

FWHM = 2 nm

Page 10: Philippe Hering phering@slac.stanford.edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe

Philippe Hering

[email protected]

October 30, 2007

Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans

10

• We measure the temporal beam profile directly in the UV with our scanning cross-correlator. A flat top spectrum in the IR doesn’t give a flat top temporal profile in the UV because of saturation in the Tripler : asymmetric IR leads to flat top in the UV.

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

11000

12000

754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762

Wavelength (nm)

Sp

ec

tru

m I

nte

ns

ity

(a

.u.)

Compressor output spectrumwith Dazzler hole OFF

FWHM = 2 nm

BEFORE

Typical temporal shape during last commissioning

Page 11: Philippe Hering phering@slac.stanford.edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe

Philippe Hering

[email protected]

October 30, 2007

Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans

11

Improvement on the IR input spectrum shape for the Tripler has increased UV yield :

UV yield went up from <10% to >15% .

To get the same UV energy in front of the clipping iris, we decided to decrease the IR input ( ~18 mJ instead of ~28 mJ ): main IR amplifier is running with less pumping energy. Save JEDI 2 diodes (half of nominal current value) !!

Safer operation of the Tripler at short pulse duration (<6 ps).

Page 12: Philippe Hering phering@slac.stanford.edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe

Philippe Hering

[email protected]

October 30, 2007

Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans

12

Beam qualityTypical beam image on the clipping iris

during last commissioningChanges to be made :

• Work done on the pulse shaping has

improved a little the homogeneity of the

beam (to be investigated) ? • Replacement of 6 mm thick fused-silica

dichroics in UV tripler by 2 mm thick MgF2

(to lower B-integral)• Replacement of all Substrate transmissive

fused-silica optics by CaF2 (to lower

fluorescence and absorption).

Beam image on the clipping iris before transport after working on the pulse shaping (Preliminary results !)

Page 13: Philippe Hering phering@slac.stanford.edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe

Philippe Hering

[email protected]

October 30, 2007

Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans

13

Beam stability on the cathode

Jitter in x-axis = 35.4 m rmsJiiter in y-axis = 39.2 m rms

Beam position on the cathode (on VCC camera) Beam size on the cathode (on VCC camera)

Jitter in x-axis = 14.4 m rmsJiiter in y-axis = 18.9 m rms

Laser Beam on VCC camera

Instabilities in the electron beam !

Page 14: Philippe Hering phering@slac.stanford.edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe

Philippe Hering

[email protected]

October 30, 2007

Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans

14

We move the BCS shutter onto the laser table : before it was attached to the side of the table after the mirror folding the beam down through the transport tube.

We extended both ends of the vacuum transport tube : upstairs up to the laser table level and downstairs down to the laser box cover.

Jitter in x-axis = 11 m rmsJiiter in y-axis = 11 m rms

Beam position on the cathode (on VCC camera) Beam size on the cathode (on VCC camera)

Jitter in x-axis = 3.6 m rmsJiiter in y-axis = 4.7 m rms

Improvement by a factor of 3 !

Page 15: Philippe Hering phering@slac.stanford.edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe

Philippe Hering

[email protected]

October 30, 2007

Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans

15

Shot-to-shot energy stability

1.1% charge stability at 1nC

Laser energy stability vs. time < 1.5% rms

Page 16: Philippe Hering phering@slac.stanford.edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe

Philippe Hering

[email protected]

October 30, 2007

Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans

16

Original Transport Layout for 2007 Injector Commissioning F1=200

F2=120

F3=-150

F4=F5=5000

F6=1500

Beam shaper

Vacuum cell Zoom

Transport tube

Table in the

tunnel

Photocathode

Virtual Cathode

Steering system

Active Steering

Stabilization

L1

L2

L3

L4

L5

L6

WaveplatePolarizer

Powermeter

Camera

Shutter

Zoom Telescope

Page 17: Philippe Hering phering@slac.stanford.edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe

Philippe Hering

[email protected]

October 30, 2007

Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans

17

Changes in the Upstairs LayoutNo Gaussian Beam ShaperAdjustment of beam size on the cathode is accomplished by changing the magnification of the input telescope and the size of the imaged irisFirst relay stage (L1 – L3) is removed.

Input telescope has 3X higher magnification No vacuum cell is needed Iris is the object plane of the L4 and L5 imaging system

Image of the L4-L5 system is virtual L6 relay image the output of the L4 – L5 system to the cathode 4:1. L6 has remote Z-adjustment

Page 18: Philippe Hering phering@slac.stanford.edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe

Philippe Hering

[email protected]

October 30, 2007

Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans

18

Beam

Attenu

ator

Pulse Stacker

Iris Wheel

Zoom Telescope

Insertable

Power Meter

Insertable

Power Meter

Active Steering

Stabilization

New Transport Layout

UV BeamOutput

Vacuum Tube

to Gun

Page 19: Philippe Hering phering@slac.stanford.edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe

Philippe Hering

[email protected]

October 30, 2007

Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans

19

The iris diameter is adjusted by a remotely controlled aperture wheel

Laser Beam

•Wheel houses 12 apertures•Beam sizes on cathode

• 0.25 - 2.0 mm• Smaller diameters can be done

•Design allows for rapid change

for additional apertures •Wheel is controlled via Epics

Page 20: Philippe Hering phering@slac.stanford.edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe

Philippe Hering

[email protected]

October 30, 2007

Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans

20

Option of Focusing the Beam on the Cathode

Transport tube

Table in the

tunnel

Photocathode

Steering system

Active Steering

Stabilization

F4=F5=5000

F6=1500

L4

L5

L6Shutter

LCleaning

Removable Lens LCleaning F=3m

Z-adjustment of L6 changes the beam size on the cathode

Page 21: Philippe Hering phering@slac.stanford.edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe

Philippe Hering

[email protected]

October 30, 2007

Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans

21

No Major Changes to Vault Transport

M5

L5

M4

L6 M3

M2

VC Power Meter

Cathode

M1

C1

C2 UV plates for Cameras

Cathode Cleaning Lens

Page 22: Philippe Hering phering@slac.stanford.edu October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe

Philippe Hering

[email protected]

October 30, 2007

Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans

22

Work in progress before next commissioning

Vacuum Transport CleaningLayout and Alignment of New Optical TransportInstall New Controls Hardware

Power MetersCameras and UV platesIris Wheel

Beam quality still needs to be improvedSoftware Installation and Certification of ControlsCertification of Laser OperationTraining of Operators before LCLS restart