phd overview: sustainable production and consumption by upcycling - understanding and scaling up...
TRANSCRIPT
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Kyungeun Sung Supervised by Tim Cooper & Sarah Kettley Sustainable Consumption Research Group
College of Art, Architecture, Design and Humanities
Sustainable production and consumption by upcycling: Understanding and scaling up niche
environmentally significant behaviour
Horizon Scanning Module (MA Product Design) 17/10/2016
PhD research overview
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
My background
BSc in Industrial Design, KAIST (2001-2005)
Product Designer in Samsung Electronics (2005-2007)
MSc in Strategic Product Design, TUDelft (2007-2010)
Project Researcher in Enviu (2010)
Design Researcher & UX Designer in LG Electronics (2011-2012)
Lecturer in Industrial Design and Technology, UB (2012-2013)
PhD in Sustainable Design, NTU (2013-2016)
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Kyungeun Sung Supervised by Tim Cooper & Sarah Kettley Sustainable Consumption Research Group
College of Art, Architecture, Design and Humanities
Sustainable production and consumption by upcycling: Understanding and scaling up niche
environmentally significant behaviour
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Table of contents
Introduction
Literature review
Research methods
Conclusion
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Introduction
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Introduction: Project background
UK target: Reductions in GHGs by 80% from 1990 levels by 2050.
Government’s commitment: RCUK Energy Programme.
E U E D
CIE-MAP I-STUTE
Demand
CSEF
CIED
CEE
CIE-MAP goal: identify opportunities that may ultimately deliver a reduction in GHGs
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Introduction: Longer lifetimes for industrial energy reduction
Embodied energy: the total (direct and indirect) energy required for the production of economic or environmental goods and services (Costanza, 1980)
Material efficiency: reducing the amount of new material inputs per given level of service or output reduce energy demand for industry (S. Cooper et
al., 2016)
Product lifetime extension: reducing demand for new products/production increase material efficiency (T. Cooper, 2010)
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Introduction: Product lifetimes extension
Exception: more energy efficient products for high energy consuming products (e.g. washing machine) (e.g. Brezet et al., 1997; Charter & Tischner, 2001)
Strategies: durable design; repair and upgrade services (Cooper, 2002)
Durable design: negative perception from manufacturers; early replacement buyers’ concern; durability as low priority for purchasing decision; frequent relative obsolescence (e.g. Cooper, 2004; Van Nes and Cramer, 2005)
Repair and upgrade services: high cost of labour relative to energy and raw materials (Cooper, 1999)
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Introduction: Consumer trend of upcycling
Creation or modification of any product out of used materials in an attempt to result in a product of higher quality or value than the compositional elements (Sung et al., 2014) by individuals (at the household level)
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Introduction: Consumer trend of upcycling
Creation or modification of any product out of used materials in an attempt to result in a product of higher quality or value than the compositional elements (Sung et al., 2014) by individuals (at the household level)
No need to force manufacturers
No need to pay for professional services
Add new features + change design/style
Alternative to durable design + professional services
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Introduction: Consumer trend of upcycling
contemporary Maker Movement (Anderson, 2012; Lang, 2013)
readily available physical resources (e.g. Hackspaces)
shared digital resources (e.g. Instructables, Etsy)
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Introduction: Research question
Despite growing interest, still a marginal activity
Scaled up (Ceschin, 2012; Van den Bosch, 2010) extended lifetimes increased material efficiency reduced embodied energy GHGs reduction
How can this emerging, yet still marginal activity, be scaled up into a mainstream everyday activity in households (and possibly also in industries) to make a bigger impact on the environment and society?
Landscape
Regimes
Niches
Scaling up of niches to regimes (Sung, 2016)
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Introduction: Aims and objectives
Aim: develop actionable strategies for upscaling upcycling in households (and beyond) to contribute ultimately to the reduction of GHGs
Objectives:
1. Gain insights into upcycling in the UK
2. Identify UK-specific key behavioural factors for upcycling
3. Formulate design and policy interventions for upscaling upcycling
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Literature review
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Definitions
Publication trends
Trends in practice
Benefits
Drawbacks and barriers
Links with product attachment
Environmentally significant behaviour
Behaviour models
Theory of Interpersonal Behaviour & Theory of Planned Behaviour
Transition and multi-level perspective
Scaling up
Scaling up approaches: DfSB; policies; TM; behaviour intervention approaches and principles
Literature review: Three knowledge domains
Upcycling Understanding behaviour Scaling up
Research gaps + approaches applicable
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Research methods
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Methods: Overarching framework
Adapted framework based on Darnton’s Nine Principles framework (Sung, et al., 2016; Sung, 2016)
Semi-structured interviews
Internet survey
Semi-Delphi
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Stage one: Understanding consumer behaviour
1. Identify behaviour model for exploration
Methods:
Thorough literature review
Behaviour is complex and should be understood by both internal (e.g. attitude) and external (e.g. situational conditions) factors (Egmond & Bruel, 2007;
Jackson 2005; Kallbekken, Rise & Westskog, 2008; artiskainen, 2007)
Triandis’ Theory of Interpersonal Behaviour (TIB): recommended through an extensive review on behaviour models by Jackson (2005) and Martiskainen (2007); factors shared with a number of comprehensive models (e.g. Feola &
Binder, 2010; Klöckner & Blöbaum, 2010; Kallbekken, Rise, & Westskog, 2008); wide applicability (e.g. technology adoption behaviour, civic behaviour, dietary behaviour, sustainable consumption)
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Stage one: Understanding consumer behaviour
2. Understand consumer behaviour
Semi-structured interviews with 23 UK-based consumers with practical upcycling experience
Sampling: Hackspace/Makerspace forums + snowball
Questions: upcycling frequency; materials; materials acquisition; material selection criteria; end product usage; when; where; with whom; influencing factors based on TIB
Methods:
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Stage two: Identifying key behaviour-influencing factors
1. Refine behaviour model for operationalisation
Issues in TIB: a) no operational definition of variables (Araujo-Soares &
Presseau, 2008); b) differences in a few adapted models (e.g. Gagnon, et al.,
2008; Bamberg & Schmidt, 2003; Knoeri & Russell, 2014)
Combine TIB and TPB (Ajzen, 1991; Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980) – one of the widely used models but with limited prediction/explanation power – for improved operationalisability and explanation power
Methods:
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
2. Identify key drivers, facilitators and barriers
Internet survey with 122 British residents
Sampling: websites identified through interviews
Questions (TIB + TPB): attitude; social factors (role beliefs/ personal norm/ subjective norm); perceived behaviour control; intention; perceived facilitating conditions; behaviour frequency
Methods: Stage two: Identifying key behaviour-influencing factors
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Methods: Stage three: Developing intervention strategies
1. Design effective intervention strategies
Synthesis of the main findings and implications for scaling up
Target population / approaches / ideas
Intervention strategies development based on Defra’s 4Es (Enable/ Encourage/ Exemplify/ Engage) model
15 initial strategies
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Methods: Stage three: Developing intervention strategies
2. Evaluate and improve the draft strategies
Semi-Delphi method: questionnaire + workshop with experts (n=25)
Expertise: policy (n=6), engineering (6), psychology (3), sociology (3), art and design (3), business management (2), and economics (2).
Questions: importance; feasibility; suitable actor(s); new interventions; top 5 interventions
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Conclusion
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment
Conclusion
Meeting the aim and objectives
Limitations
Applicability of the research findings
Contribution to knowledge
Suggestions for future research
Kyungeun Sung, Sustainable Consumption Research Group, School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment Image sources: http://image.slidesharecdn.com/clapresentation-talisopenday-march14-140328085008-phpapp01/95/cla-presentation-talis-open-day-march-14-14-638.jpg?cb=1395996639
Thank you! Any question?
[email protected] http://kyungeunsung.com https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kyungeun_Sung