pervaporation overview camilo mancera arias ph. d. student graduate program of chemical and process...

26
Pervapora Pervapora tion tion Overview Overview Pervaporat Pervaporat ion ion Overview Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Upload: virgil-wiggins

Post on 11-Jan-2016

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

PervaporatiPervaporation on

OverviewOverview

PervaporatiPervaporation on

OverviewOverviewCamilo Mancera Arias

Ph. D. Student

Graduate Program of Chemical and Process

Engineering - URV.

Tarragona - 2004.

Membrane Separations

Page 2: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Discussion TopicsDiscussion Topics

Pervaporation Principles

Model Description

Performance parameters

Influence Parameters

Membranes for Pervaporation

Applications

Modules

Process Design

Process energy requirements

A Little of History

Page 3: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

A Little of History

1

• Was discovered in 1917 by Kober.

• The first full scale plant was installed in Brazil in 1982 for the production of ethanol.

• Appears as a promising and commercially competitive process for separation (more cost effective for some specific problems).

Figure 1. Membrane market

Page 4: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

2

Current position market

• Actually there are 120 PV installations in used world wide.

• Le Carbone-Lorraine is a very important French company that has built many of them.

• Pervaporation still have to compete against other membrane separation techniques.

A Little of History

Future potential

• Significant energy savings of up to 55% could be achieved by replacing all the thermal separation processes in the EU and Norway by pervaporation.

• Because pervaporation systems make use of more advanced technologies than conventional separation methods, investment costs are considered comparable.

• Simple pay back times of less than 1 year have been reported for pervaporation installations.

• Operation and maintenance costs (O&M) are expected to be higher than the conventional separation process.

Market barriers

• Lack of information.

• Poor availability of investment capital.

• Perceived risks associated with the reliability of the process.

Comparing pervaporation with

distillation.

Comparing pervaporation with

distillation.

Page 5: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Pervaporation Principles

• Is the only membrane process where phase transition occurs.

• At least the heat of vaporization have to be supply.

• The mass transport is achieved lowering the activity of the permeating component on the permeate side by: gas carrier, vacuum or temperature difference.

• The driving force is the partial pressure difference of the permeate between the feed and permeate streams.

• The permeate pressure has to be lower than the saturation pressure of the permeant to achieve the separation.

Figure 2. Schematic draws of pervaporation processes.

3

Vacuum Pervaporation

Gas carrier Pervaporation

Temperature difference

Pervaporation

Page 6: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Mechanism of Transport

Pervaporation involve a sequence of three steps:

• Selective sorption

• Selective diffusion through the membrane.

• Desorption into a vapor phase on the permeate side.

Because of its characteristics, pervaporation is often mistakenly considered as a kind of extractive distillation but VLE Solution-Diffution mechanism.

Figure 3. Comparison between VLE and pervaporation

4

Page 7: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Model Description

Solution-Diffusion Model

• Membrane permeability is a function of solubility and diffusivity:

• Diffusivity and solubility are strongly dependent of feed composition.

• The liquids have more affinity towards polymeric membranes than gases (Flory–Huggins theory instead Raoult’s law).

• Equation of transport:

jiijiii CCSCCDP ,,

piiiii

i pypxl

PJ 0

Thermodynamic accounting approach

• It’s distinguished two steps:

• Equilibrium evaporation.

• Membrane permeation of the hypothetic vapor.

• Membrane selectivity contribution to overall separation is showed as a change of composition for the vapor phase lowering the total pressure below equilibrium vapor pressure (Thompson diagram).

There are two ways to rationalize the observed separation effects in pervaporation:

Figure 4. Thompson diagram

5

Page 8: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Activity Profile

Figure 5. Activity profile

• The liquid swells the membrane in pervaporation (anisotropic swelling).

•The activity of the liquid is equal to the activity on the membrane (Thermodynamic equilibrium).

• The concentration of the liquid on the feed side of the membrane is maximum whilst on the permeate side is almost zero.

• Flux equation (pure liquid):

• The concentration inside the membrane (cim) is the main parameter, implying that

permeation rate is mainly determine for the interaction membrane-penetrant.

• When concentration inside the membrane increase the permeation rate also increase.

1,0 mii

ii ckExp

l

DJ

Concentration dependance diffusion coef.

Concentration dependance diffusion coef. iiii ckExpDD ,0

ki Plasticizing constant, membrane

– permeant interaction

ki Plasticizing constant, membrane

– permeant interaction

6

Page 9: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Mixture of Liquids

For the transport of liquid mixtures through a polymeric membrane the flux can also be described in terms of solubility and diffusivity, then two phenomena must be distinguished:

• Flow coupling: Is described in terms of the non-equilibrium thermodynamics and accounts for that the transport of a component is affected due to the gradient of the other component.

• Thermodynamic interaction: Is a much more important phenomenon. It accounts for the interaction of one component over the membrane, it becomes more accessible to the other component(s) because the membrane becomes more swollen (the diffusion resistance decrease).

Figures 6. Mixture of liquids7

Overall

sorption

Overall

Flux

Sorption

selectivity

Pervaporation

selectivity

Page 10: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Performance Parameters

Some of the most important parameters used to assess the pervaporation process are:

1. Pervaporation selectivity: This parameter compare the analytical compositions of permeate and feed. There are two forms:

• Separation factor,

• Enrichment factor,

Feed

Permeate

Feed

Permeateij

cjci

pjpi

cjci

cjci

iF

iPi c

c

2. Sorption selectivity: Permeability is function of solubility and diffusivity and both may be selective.

Sorption selectivity may or may not be equal to pervaporation selectivity. Due to contribution of selective diffusivity to the overall separation effect.

SDPV Figure 7. Sorption isotherms8

Flory-Huggins Isotherm(Glassy: liquid

sorption)

Langmuir Isotherm(Glassy: gas

sorption)

Henry Isotherm(Rubbery: liquid

and gas sorption)

Page 11: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Performance Parameters (2)

3. Evaporation selectivity: The separation factor is considered to be a product of evaporation separation and membrane separation yields:

Membrane selectivity depends on permeate pressure, while evaporation invariably enriches the more volatile solution compound.

4. Flux: Denote the amount of permeate per unit membrane area and unit time at given membrane thickness. It’s a realy important parameter for the operation of the process.

Fj

i

pj

i

Fj

i

Fj

i

MEVPV

pp

pp

cc

pp

11 MM or

Pervaporation favors the more volatile compound

Pervaporation favors the more volatile compound

Pervaporation favors the less volatile compound

Pervaporation favors the less volatile compound

9

Page 12: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Influence Parameters

1. Feed concentration: Refers to the concentration of the preferentially permeating (usually minor) solution component, being depleted in the process. There are two aspects to be considered:the activity of the target component in the feed and the solubility of the target component in the membrane.

• Activity coefficient: The activity of a liquid solution component is given by its partial vapor pressure:

The behavior of the liquid solution is determined for the activity coefficient:

• Azeotropic mixture: Positive solution non-ideality is asociated with positive azeotropes, and negative solution non-ideality is asociated with negative azeotropoes. Pervaporation can separate only positive azeotropes.

• Concentration polarization: In pervaporation, a depletion of the preferentially permeating species near the membrane boundary is to be expected, limiting its polymer sorption. But depends of the concentration dependance and sign of the activity coefficient of the penetrant species.

00iiiiiF papxp

11 ii or Positive deviation from Raoul’s law

Positive deviation from Raoul’s law

Negative deviation from Raoult’s law

Negative deviation from Raoult’s law

10

Page 13: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Influence Parameters (2)

2. Membrane thickness:

• Refers to dry thickness.

• Because flux is inversely proportional to membrane thickness, thin membranes favors the overall flux but decrease selectivity.

• Thin membranes are used for low swelling glassy membranes and thick membranes are used for high swelling elastomeric membranes to maintain the selectivity.

3. Pemeate pressure:

• Permeate pressure provides the driving force in pervaporation.

• The permeation rate of any feed component increases as its partial permeate pressure is lowered. The highest conceivable permeate pressure is the vapor pressure of the penetrant in the liquid feed.

• The effect of this parameter on pervaporation performance is dictated by the magnitude of the vapor pressures encountered, and by the difference in vapor pressures between them. The highest

vacuum feasible is 1

atm.

The highest vacuum

feasible is 1 atm.11

Page 14: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Influence Parameters (3)

4. Temperature

• Refers to feed temperature or any other representative between feed and retentate streems.

• The feed liquid provided the heat of vaporization of the permeate, and in consequence there is a temperature loss between the feed and retentate stream where the membrane act as a heat exchanger barrier.

• Temperature affects solubility and diffusivity of all permeants, as well as the extent of mutual interaction between them. Favoring the flux and having minor effect on selectivity.

Pervaporation at elevated

feed temperatures.

Pervaporation at elevated

feed temperatures.

12

Page 15: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Membranes for Pervaporation

Membrane Polymers:

The choice of the membrane material has direct bearing on the separation effect to be achieved. Two main kinds of polymers for pervaporation may be identified:

13

Figure 8. Amorphous polymer

1. Glassy (Amorphous polymers): Preferentially permeates water and follows a Flory-Huggins type sorption isotherm.

2. Elastomeric: Polymers interact preferentially with the organic solution component, the sorption isotherm is of the Henry type.

Molecular motion is restricted to molecular

vibrations (no rotation or move in the space of the

chains)

Molecular motion is restricted to molecular

vibrations (no rotation or move in the space of the

chains)

Polymers soft and

flexible.

Polymers soft and

flexible.

Page 16: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Membranes for Pervaporation (2)

Important remarks for polymer choice:

• Glassy polymers may behave as an elastomer when Toperation > Tg (Swelling takes down Tg).

• It’s important that membranes don’t swells too much because the selectivity will decrease drastically.

• In other hand low sorption or swelling will result in a very low flux.

• Crosslinking should be used only when the membrane swells excessively (p.e. High concentrated solutions). Because crosslinking has a negative influence on the permeation rate.

Figure 9. Tensile module vs T. Figure 10. Diffusivity vs degree of swelling (non porous

polymers)14

glassy

state

rubbery

state

Log E

Tg T

Page 17: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Membrane Structure

* Non-porous membranes.

* Anisotropic morphology.

* Asymmetric or composite membranes (porous top layer and open porous sublayer)

Pervaporation membranes should meet:

* Have a proportional thickness with performance

* Not pose technical resistance to withdrawal.

* Have dimensional stability under swelling conditions.

The Requirements for the substructure are:

* Open substructure.

* A high surface porosity with a narrow pore size distribution.

To minimize transport resistance and avoid capillary condensation

To minimize transport resistance and avoid capillary condensation

Mechanical resistance and swelling

Mechanical resistance and swelling

Figure 12. Non porous asymmetric membrane

15Figure11. Non porous composite

membrane

Page 18: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Applications

Aqueous mixtures

• Removal of water from organic solvents.

• Alcohols from fermentation broths (ethanol, butanol, etc..)

• Volatile organic contaminants from waste water (aromatics, chlorinated hydrocarbons)

• Removal of flavor and aroma compounds.

• Removal of phenolic compounds.

Non-aqueous mixtures

• Alcohols/aromatics (methanol/toluene)

• Alcohols/aliphatics (ethanol/hexane)

• Alcohols/ethers (Methanol/MTBE)

• Cyclohexane/benzene

• Hexane/toluene.

• Butane/butene.

• C-8 isomers (o-xylene, m-xylene, p-xylene, styrene).

Are found usually on the chemical process industry but there are other areas for is application as:

* Food.

* Farmaceutical industries.

* Enviromental problems.

* Analytical aplications.

Since there are a lot of applications there is a classification that can be useful:

DehydrationDehydrationVolatile organic

compounds from water

Volatile organic compounds from water

{{Polar/Non polar

Polar/Non polar

}}}} Aromatics/Aliphatics

Aromatics/Aliphatics

Saturated/Unsaturated

Saturated/Unsaturated

IsomersIsomers16

Page 19: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Applications (2)

Pervaporation is used mainly to remove a small amount of liquid from a azeotropic liquid mixture where simple distillation can’t make the separation.

Figure 13. Pervaporation of 50-50 azeotropic mixture.

Figure 14. Hybrid process distillation and pervaporation.

Other common application is when a binary mixture as located the azeotrope somewhere in the middle of the composition range, in this case pervaporation don’t made the complete separation but break the azeotrope.

17

Page 20: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Modules

The more suitable modules types are:

Hollow fiber module: This module is used with an inside–out configuration to avoid increase in permeate pressure within the fibers, but the outside–in configuration can be used with short fibers. Another advantage of the inside-out configuration is that the thin top layer is better protected but higher membrane area can be achieved with the outside-in configuration

Plate and Frame: This module is mainly used for dehydration of organic compounds.

Figure 15. Hollow fiber module.

Figure 16. Plate and frame module.18

Page 21: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Modules (2)

Spiral wound module: This module is very similar to the plate and frame system but has a greater packing density. This type of module is used with organophilic membranes to achieved organic–organic separations.

Tubular modules: Inorganic (ceramic) membranes are produced mainly as tubes, then the obvious module is the tube bundle for applications that used this kind of membranes. On the other hand, for sweep gas pervaporation, tubular membranes conducting the gas-permeate mixture are the only option.

Figure 17. Spiral wound module

Figure18. Tubular module

19

Page 22: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Process Design

Pervaporation stage: Pervaporation is a cross flow operation at ambient feed pressure. The enthalpy of evaporation produces a temperature loss of the feed stream, suggesting developing the process into individual separation units interspersed with heat exchangers.

Figure 19. Ethanol dehydration20

The size of the separation units

(membrane area) will depend on the allowable

temperature drop!

The size of the separation units

(membrane area) will depend on the allowable

temperature drop!

Page 23: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Process Design

In membrane separation cascades, the permeate of one stage constitutes the feed to a subsequent stage. The characteristics of pervaporation allow the design of pervaporation cascades for the recovery of the dilute feed components. p.e. Using an appropiate membrane, the target component is enrich in the permeate in the initial pervaporation stage and employing a different type of membrane the remaining solvent is removed from the first stage permeate, recovering the target component on the retentate of the second stage.

Figure 20. Cascade configuration

21

Page 24: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Process Energy Requirements

As partial pressure is the driven force for pervaporation and when a vacuum pump is used to adjust the partial pressure at the permeate side, then the power required is give by:

There is another need of energy related to the evaporation of the permeate, here the feed stream is heat up before entering the process to supply this heat:

1

2lnp

pnRTE

vapprffpf HmTTCm

,

Molar flow rateMolar flow rate

Isothermal efficiencyIsothermal efficiency

22

Page 25: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Summary

23

Advantages

• Low energy consumption.

• Low investment cost.

• Better selectivity without thermodynamic limitations.

• Clean and close operation.

• No process wastes.

• Compact and scalable units.

Drawbacks

• Scarce membrane market.

• Lack of information.

• Low permeate flows.

• Better selectivity without thermodynamic limitations.

• Limited applications:

• Organic substances dehydration.

• Recovery of volatile compounds at low concentrations.

• Separation of azeotropic mixtures.

Page 26: Pervaporation Overview Camilo Mancera Arias Ph. D. Student Graduate Program of Chemical and Process Engineering - URV. Tarragona - 2004. Membrane Separations

Membranes: Composite membranes with anelastomeric or glassy polymeric top layer.

Thickness: 0.1 to f ew m (for top layer)Pore size: Non-porousDriven force: Partial vapor pressure or activity

diff erence.Separation principle: Solution/ Diff usionMembrane material: Elastomeric and glassy.Applications: Dehydration of organic solvents.

Removal of organic compounds f romwater.

Polar/ non-polar.

Saturated/ unsaturated.

Separation of isomers.

24

Summary (2)