pacific northwest lng application information requirements on

Pacific NorthWest LNG

Application Information Requirements

As Approved by Environmental Assessment Office

On February 20, 2014

For Pacific NorthWest LNG Limited Partnership

Application for an Environmental Assessment Certificate

Note from the Environmental Assessment Office: This Application Information Requirements document (AIR) also refers to requirements from the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency’s (CEAA) Environmental Impact Statement Guidelines (EISg) that are not required by the Environmental Assessment Office (EAO). The AIR and the EISg work in conjunction with each other, and these additional requirements were included for ease of reading and to facilitate the submission of one Application/EIS document under a coordinated assessment process. EAO’s environmental assessment will be limited to the scope of the assessment as outlined in the Section 11 Order.

PACIFIC NORTHWEST LNG Application Information Requirements

Prepared for: Pacific NorthWest LNG Limited Partnership

Oceanic Plaza, Suite 1900 - 1066 West Hastings Street Vancouver, BC V6E 3X1

Tel: (778) 372-4700 | Fax: (604) 630-3181

Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 4370 Dominion Street, Suite 500 Burnaby, BC V5G 4L7 Tel: (604) 436-3014 | Fax: (604) 436-3752

Project No.: 1231-10537

Date: February 2014

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements

Preface

February 2014 Project No. 1231-10537

i

PREFACE

Purpose of Application Information Requirements

The proposed Project meets the thresholds established for “reviewable projects” under British Columbia’s Environmental Assessment Act (BCEAA) pursuant to Part 4 of the Reviewable Projects Regulation, because the proposed Project includes a new energy storage facility with the capability to store an energy resource in a quantity that can yield by combustion ≥ 3 PJ of energy.

An Environmental Assessment Certificate Application (Application) will be filed by the Proponent to the British Columbia Environmental Assessment Office (BC EAO), and the Application will comply with the Application Information Requirements (AIR) that were approved and issued by BC EAO. The AIR specifies the information that must be provided in an Application for an EAC under the BCEAA.

Overview of Proposed Project

Pacific NorthWest LNG Limited Partnership (PNW LNG) is proposing to construct and operate a liquefied natural gas (LNG) facility within the District of Port Edward, British Columbia (the proposed Project). The proposed Project would be located on Lelu Island within the lands and waters under the jurisdiction of the Prince Rupert Port Authority (PRPA). The proposed Project would convert natural gas from Progress Energy Canada Ltd. reserves into LNG for export to Pacific Rim markets in Asia. PNW LNG is a subsidiary of PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD (PETRONAS). PNW LNG’s engineering, procurement, construction and commissioning (EPCC) contractor will construct and commission the facility and PNW LNG will own and operate it.

At full build-out the facility would receive approximately 3.2 billion standard cubic feet per day (Bcfd), or 9.1 x 107 cubic metres (m3) per day, of pipeline grade natural gas, and produce up to 19.2 million tonnes per annum (MTPA) of LNG. The natural gas would be transported to the proposed Project via a new pipeline from northeast BC. The pipeline is a separate project that would be constructed, owned and operated by a third party (Prince Rupert Gas Transmission a subsidiary of TransCanada Pipelines Ltd.) and assessed independently under the applicable regulatory regime.

Key components of the proposed Project are described in Section 2.2 and include: a natural gas reception system, gas pretreatment, three 6.4 MTPA natural gas liquefaction trains, three full containment 180,000 m3 LNG storage tanks, a marine terminal and berths with a trestle, trestle control room, two LNG carrier berths, shipping LNG (between the terminal and Triple Island pilotage station), a materials off-loading facility (MOF), an access road, pioneer dock, bridge, and pipeline and utility connections (e.g., water and sewer).

Natural gas is the primary option proposed to power the liquefaction process and ancillary components of the proposed Project. It is anticipated that the proposed Project would be constructed in two phases with the first phase having a design capacity of 12.8 MTPA of LNG with an additional 6.4 MTPA of capacity to be developed after the first two trains are operational. The EIS/Application will include both phases. Provided all necessary federal, provincial and local authorizations are obtained, the proposed Project is expected to be operational by early 2019.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Preface

February 2014

Project No. 1231-10537

ii

Coordinated Canada/BC Environmental Assessment

An assessment for the proposed Project will be completed under both the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 (CEAA 2012) and BCEAA. The BC EAO and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEA Agency) have agreed to work together to conduct a coordinated environmental assessment for the proposed Project.

This document proposes information that will be included by PNW LNG in its Application for a provincial EAC, and takes into account the scope of the environmental assessment to be conducted by the CEA Agency to meet federal information requirements. As set out in the section 11 Order issued by BC EAO, this AIR focuses the provincial environmental assessment primarily on those effects beyond the Prince Rupert Port Authority lands and waters.

The CEA Agency issued final Environmental Impact Statement Guidelines (EIS Guidelines) on October 30, 2013. Taken together, the EIS Guidelines and the AIR describe how PNW LNG will meet both federal and provincial environmental assessment requirements through a coordinated review process.

Development of the AIR

The BC EAO provided the following federal and provincial agencies, local governments, and Aboriginal groups the opportunity to review and comment on the dAIR:

Provincial Agencies:

Ministry of Community, Sport and Cultural Development

Ministry of Environment

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations

Ministry of Health

Ministry of Jobs, Tourism and Skills Training

Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure

Oil and Gas Commission

Federal Agencies:

Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency

Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Environment Canada

Transport Canada

Health Canada

Parks Canada

Prince Rupert Port Authority

Municipal and Regional Agencies:

District of Port Edward

City of Prince Rupert

Regional District of Skeena-Queen Charlotte


Preface


iii

Northern Health Authority

Aboriginal Groups (as identified in Schedule B of the section 11 Order):

Metlakatla First Nation

Lax Kw’alaams First Nation

Gitxaala Nation

Kitselas First Nation

Kitsumkalum First Nation.

Next Steps in the Environmental Assessment

Comments received on the dAIR from the Working Group, and the public during the public comment period, were considered prior to finalizing the AIR. PNW LNG considered all relevant Working Group and public comments received, and incorporated changes into the dAIR as appropriate. PNW LNG maintained a tracking table to document the comments received, and responses to the comments, including any adjustments made to the dAIR as a result of the feedback.

Based on the final EIS Guidelines and the final AIR, PNW LNG plans to file an integrated Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Assessment Certificate Application (EIS/Application) to the CEA Agency and BC EAO that would meet the environmental assessment requirements of both the federal and provincial governments.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Table of Contents

February 2014


iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS

This section will provide the table contents for all document components, including volumes, sections, sub-sections, figures, tables, and appendices in the EIS/Application. For this document, it provides the table of contents for the AIR.

1 Introduction and Project Overview ...................................................................................... 1

1.1 Purpose of the EIS/Application ...................................................................................... 1

1.2 Proponent Description .................................................................................................... 1

1.3 Purpose of the Project .................................................................................................... 2

1.4 Project Location ............................................................................................................. 2

1.5 Participants in the Environmental Assessment .............................................................. 2

1.6 Regulatory Framework and the Role of Government .................................................... 2

2 Project Description ................................................................................................................ 6

2.1 Environmental Design .................................................................................................... 6

2.2 Project Components ....................................................................................................... 6

2.3 Project Activities ............................................................................................................. 7

2.4 Alternative Means of Carrying Out the Project ............................................................ 13

2.5 Project Land Use .......................................................................................................... 13

2.6 Federal Scope of the Project ....................................................................................... 14

2.7 Provincial Scope of the Project .................................................................................... 14

2.8 Applicable Permits and Regulatory Approvals ............................................................. 14

3 Summary of Engagement ................................................................................................... 15

3.1 Provincial and Federal Involvement and Issues Tracking ........................................... 15

3.2 Aboriginal Groups Information Distribution and Consultation ...................................... 15

3.3 Public and Agency Information Distribution and Consultation ..................................... 15

3.3.1 Pre-Application Consultation ......................................................................... 16

3.3.2 Consultation Planned During EIS/Application Review .................................. 16

4 Scope of Assessment and Methods .................................................................................. 17

4.1 Environmental Assessment Methods ........................................................................... 18

4.1.1 Valued Components ...................................................................................... 19

4.1.2 Assessment Boundaries ................................................................................ 32

4.1.2.1 Temporal Boundaries .................................................................... 32

4.1.2.2 Spatial Boundaries ........................................................................ 32

4.1.2.3 Administrative and Technical Boundaries ..................................... 35

4.1.3 Baseline Conditions ....................................................................................... 36

4.1.4 Assessment of Project-Specific Effects ......................................................... 36

4.1.4.1 Identification of Project Interactions .............................................. 36

4.1.4.2 Potential Effects of the Project ...................................................... 39

4.1.4.3 Mitigation ....................................................................................... 39


Table of Contents


v

4.1.4.4 Characterization of Residual Effects ............................................. 39

4.1.4.5 Likelihood ...................................................................................... 40

4.1.4.6 Determination of Significance ....................................................... 41

4.1.4.7 Confidence and Risk ..................................................................... 41

4.1.5 Summary of Residual Effects ........................................................................ 41

4.2 Assessment of Cumulative Effects .............................................................................. 41

4.2.1 Project Inclusion List ..................................................................................... 41

4.2.2 Cumulative Effects Assessment .................................................................... 43

4.2.3 Description of Cumulative Effects ................................................................. 43

4.2.4 Mitigation of Cumulative Effects .................................................................... 43

4.2.5 Characterization of Residual Cumulative Effects .......................................... 44

4.2.6 Determination of Significance of Cumulative Effects .................................... 44

4.3 Follow-Up Program ...................................................................................................... 44

5 Existing Environment .......................................................................................................... 53

6 Air Quality ............................................................................................................................. 54

6.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 54

6.2 Scope of Assessment .................................................................................................. 54

6.3 Baseline Conditions ..................................................................................................... 54

6.4 Effects Assessment ...................................................................................................... 55

6.5 Cumulative Effects ....................................................................................................... 55

6.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 55

7 Greenhouse Gas Management ........................................................................................... 56

7.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 56




7.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 56

8 Acoustic Environment ......................................................................................................... 57

8.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 57





8.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 58

9 Ambient Light ....................................................................................................................... 59

9.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 59




February 2014


vi



9.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 60

10 Vegetation and Wetland Resources ................................................................................... 61

10.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 61





10.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 63

11 Terrestrial Wildlife and Marine Birds ................................................................................. 64

11.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 64





11.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 66

12 Freshwater Aquatic Resources .......................................................................................... 67

12.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 67





12.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 68

13 Marine Resources ................................................................................................................ 69

13.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 69





13.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 71

14 Economic Environment ....................................................................................................... 72

14.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 72





14.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 73


Table of Contents


vii

15 Navigation and Marine Resource Use ............................................................................... 74

15.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 74





15.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 75

16 Infrastructure and Services ................................................................................................ 76

16.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 76





16.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 78

17 Visual Quality ....................................................................................................................... 79

17.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 79





17.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 80

18 Community Health and Well-Being .................................................................................... 81

18.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 81





18.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 82

19 Human and Ecological Health ............................................................................................ 83

19.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 83





19.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 84

20 Archaeological and Heritage Resources ........................................................................... 85

20.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 85



February 2014


viii




20.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 86

21 Current Use of Lands and Resources for Traditional Purposes .................................... 87

21.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 87





21.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 88

22 Accidents or Malfunctions .................................................................................................. 89

23 Effects of the Environment on the Project ........................................................................ 90

24 Summary of Proposed Environmental and Operational Management Plans ................ 91

25 Changes to the Environment .............................................................................................. 92

26 Effects of Changes to the Environment ............................................................................ 93

27 Aboriginal Rights and Related Interests ........................................................................... 94

27.1 Aboriginal Rights .......................................................................................................... 94

27.2 Other Matters of Concern to Aboriginal People ........................................................... 94

28 Summary of the Assessment ............................................................................................. 96

29 Benefits to Canadians ......................................................................................................... 97

30 Follow-up Program and Compliance Reporting ............................................................... 99

31 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 100

32 References .......................................................................................................................... 101

33 Appendices ......................................................................................................................... 103


Table of Contents


ix

List of Tables

Table 1: Table of Concordance between the EIS Guidelines and EIS/Application ................. xii

Table 2: Table of Concordance between the Approved AIR and EIS/Application................... xii

Table 3: Overview of Project Components and Activities ......................................................... 9

Table 4: Valued Components and Rationale for Inclusion in the EIS/Application .................. 21

Table 5: Valued Components, Sub-Components, Potential Adverse Project Effects and Measurable Parameters .................................................................................... 25

Table 6: Local Assessment Area Boundaries ......................................................................... 33

Table 7: Regional Assessment Area Boundaries ................................................................... 34

Table 8: Potential for Substantive/Meaningful Project-Environment Interactions ................... 37

Table 9: Summary of Residual Project Effects ....................................................................... 40

Table 10: Preliminary Project Inclusion List .............................................................................. 42

Table 11: Potential Effects on Air Quality ................................................................................. 55

Table 12: Potential Effects on Acoustic Environment ............................................................... 58

Table 13: Potential Effects on Ambient Light ............................................................................ 59

Table 14: Potential Effects on Vegetation and Wetland Resources ......................................... 63

Table 15: Potential Effects on Terrestrial Wildlife and Marine Birds......................................... 65

Table 16: Potential Effects on Freshwater Aquatic Resources ................................................ 68

Table 17: Potential Effects on Marine Resources..................................................................... 70

Table 18: Potential Effects on the Economic Environment ....................................................... 73

Table 19: Potential Effects on Navigation and Marine Resource Use ...................................... 75

Table 20: Potential Effects on Infrastructure and Services ....................................................... 77

Table 21: Potential Effects on Visual Quality ............................................................................ 80

Table 22: Potential Effects on Community Health and Well-Being........................................... 82

Table 23: Potential Effects on Human and Ecological Health .................................................. 84

Table 24: Potential Effects on Heritage and Archaeological Resources .................................. 86

Table 25: Potential Effects on Current Use of Lands and Resources for Traditional Purposes ................................................................................................................... 88

Table 26: Summary of Potential Effects on Aboriginal Rights and Related Interests and Measures to Address Effects ............................................................................. 96

Table 27: Summary of Project Residual and Cumulative Effects ............................................. 96

Table 28: Summary of Mitigation Measures and Commitments ............................................... 96


February 2014


x

List of Figures

Figure 1: Project Location .......................................................................................................... 3

Figure 2: Lelu Island and Surrounding Area .............................................................................. 4

Figure 3: Project Plot Plan and Surrounding Area ..................................................................... 5

Figure 4: Biological Local Assessment Area ............................................................................ 45

Figure 5: Physical Environment Local Assessment Areas ...................................................... 46

Figure 6: Human Environment (Set 1 of 2) Local Assessment Areas ..................................... 47

Figure 7: Human Environment (Set 2 of 2) Local Assessment Areas ..................................... 48

Figure 8: Biological Regional Assessment Areas .................................................................... 49

Figure 9: Physical Environment Regional Assessment Areas ................................................. 50

Figure 10: Human Environment (Set 1 of 2) Regional Assessment Areas ................................ 51

Figure 11: Human Environment (Set 2 of 2) Regional Assessment Areas ................................ 52


Summary of the Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Assessment Certificate Application


xi

SUMMARY OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATE APPLICATION

A summary of the Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Assessment Certificate Application (EIS/Application) will be provided as set out in the EIS Guidelines.

The summary will provide an overview of the EIS/Application and will include the following information:

A brief description of the proposed Project

A description of the coordinated federal/provincial environmental assessment

A summary of the consultations undertaken during the environmental assessment

A summary of the key issues and potential project effects

A summary of the potential environmental, economic, social, health, and heritage effects including:

Scope of the assessment

Baseline conditions

Project effects

Mitigation measures, residual effects, and significance

Cumulative effects and significance

Summary of proposed environmental and operational management plans

Summary of potential Aboriginal Rights and related interests

Follow up programs and compliance reporting proposed, if applicable

PNW LNG’s conclusions resulting from the environmental assessment.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Table of Concordance

February 2014


xii

TABLE OF CONCORDANCE

The EIS/Application will include separate concordance tables for the federal EIS Guidelines and the provincial AIR in the format below. To assist reviewers during the EIS/Application evaluation phase of the environmental assessment, the table of concordance will identify where to find in the EIS/Application information required by the federal EIS Guidelines and the provincial AIR.

Table 1: Table of Concordance between the EIS Guidelines and EIS/Application

EIS Guidelines Section

Description of Requirements of Relevant Section and Subsection Location in the

EIS/Application; Volume and Section

Table 2: Table of Concordance between the Approved AIR and EIS/Application

AIR Section Description of Requirements of Relevant Section and Subsection Location in the

EIS/Application; Volume and Section


Preface to the EIS/Application


xiii

PREFACE TO THE EIS/APPLICATION

PNW LNG will provide the following in the EIS/Application:

A statement as to the application of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act 2012 on the proposed Project.

A statement that the proposed Project meets the thresholds established for “reviewable projects” under the BC Environmental Assessment Act (BCEAA) and the thresholds met for the review under BCEAA.

A statement on whether the proposed Project is undergoing a coordinated, substituted, or other type of assessment with the Province.

A statement that the EIS/Application has been developed pursuant to the AIR, and complies with the section 11 Order as well as any other relevant direction provided by BC EAO’s Project assessment lead.

Identification of the provincial, federal and local government agencies, First Nations and other parties involved in the development of the EIS/Application.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Acronyms and Abbreviations

February 2014


xiv

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

A list of acronyms and abbreviations used in the EIS/Application will be provided. Below are the acronyms and abbreviations used in the AIR.

AAQO ........................................................................................... ambient air quality objectives

AIA ...................................................................................... archaeological impact assessment

AIR ................................................................................. Application Information Requirements

ALR ...................................................................................................... agricultural land reserve

APA ........................................................................ Association of Professional Archaeologists

Application ....................................................................................................... EAC application

BC CDC ..................................................................................... BC Conservation Data Centre

BC MFLNRO ......................... BC Ministry of Forests, Land and Natural Resource Operations

BC MOE ......................................................................................... BC Ministry of Environment

BC MOF .................................................................................................. BC Ministry of Forests

BC MOFR............................................................................. BC Ministry of Forests and Range

BC .................................................................................................................... British Columbia

BCEAA .......................................................... British Columbia Environmental Assessment Act

Bcfd ...................................................................................... billion standard cubic feet per day

CAC ...................................................................................................... criteria air contaminants

CEA Agency ...................................................... Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency

CEAA 2012 ................................................... Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012

CH4 ............................................................................................................................... methane

CMT ....................................................................................................... culturally modified tree

CN .................................................................................. Canadian National Railway Company

CO .................................................................................................................. carbon monoxide

CO2 ..................................................................................................................... carbon dioxide

COSEWIC ................................... Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada

CSA ........................................................................................ Canadian Standards Association

dAIR .......................................................................draft Application Information Requirements

dBA ............................................................................................................. decibel A-weighting

DFO ........................................................................................... Fisheries and Oceans Canada

EA ................................................................................................... environmental assessment

EAC ............................................................................... Environmental Assessment Certificate

BC EAO.................................................... British Columbia Environmental Assessment Office

EIS ............................................................................................... Environmental Impact Statement

EIS/Application ....................................................................... integrated EIS and EAC Application


Acronyms and Abbreviations


xv

EMP ...................................................................................... environmental management plan

EPCC .......................................... engineering, procurement, construction and commissioning

GDP ...................................................................................................... gross domestic product

GHG ................................................................................................................. greenhouse gas

H2S ................................................................................................................ hydrogen sulphide

ha ................................................................................................................................... hectare

HFCs ........................................................................................................... hydrofluorocarbons

ISO .................................................................................. International Standards Organization

km ............................................................................................................................... kilometre

LAA ........................................................................................................ local assessment area

Ld ............................................................................................................................... day levels

Ldn .................................................................................................................... day-night levels

Ln ............................................................................................................................. night levels

LNG ............................................................................................................ liquefied natural gas

m ....................................................................................................................................... metre

m3 ........................................................................................................................... cubic metres

MOF ............................................................................................... materials off-loading facility

MTPA ................................................................................................. million tonnes per annum

MW ...................................................................................................... megawatt (million watts)

N20 ......................................................................................................................... nitrous oxide

NO2 ................................................................................................................... nitrogen dioxide

NPRI ................................................................................. National Pollutant Release Inventory

NWWG ................................................................................ National Wetlands Working Group

OGC ................................................................................................... Oil and Gas Commission

PETRONAS ...................................................................... PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD

PFCs ............................................................................................................... perfluorocarbons

PJ .......................................................................................................... petajoules (1015 joules)

PM10 .......................................................... particulate matter less than 10 micrometres in size

PM2.5 ........................................................ particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometres in size

PNW LNG ............................................................. Pacific NorthWest LNG Limited Partnership

Project ....................................................................................... Pacific NorthWest LNG Project

PRPA ............................................................................................ Prince Rupert Port Authority

PST .............................................................................................................. provincial sales tax

RAA ................................................................................................... regional assessment area

RIC ........................................................................................... Resource Inventory Committee

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Acronyms and Abbreviations

February 2014


xvi

SARA .......................................................................................................... Species at Risk Act

SF6 ............................................................................................................. sulphur hexafluoride

SIL ............................................................................................................. survey intensity level

SO2 ..................................................................................................................... sulphur dioxide

Stantec .................................................................................................. Stantec Consulting Ltd.

t .......................................................................................................................... tonnes (metric)

t/d ....................................................................................................................... tonnes per day

TEM ............................................................................................ terrestrial ecosystem mapping

TK ............................................................................................................. traditional knowledge

USEPA ........................................................... United States Environmental Protection Agency

UTM .......................................................................................... Universal Transverse Mercator

VC ................................................................................................................. valued component

WGS-84 ..................................................................................... World Geodetic System, 1984


Glossary


xvii

GLOSSARY

A glossary will be provided in the EIS/Application as set out in the EIS Guidelines.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Authorship

February 2014


xviii

AUTHORSHIP

A list of authors will be provided in the EIS/Application.


Application Information Requirements Section 1: Introduction and Project Overview


1

1 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT OVERVIEW

1.1 Purpose of the EIS/Application This section will summarize the purpose of the EIS/Application and provide an overview of its structure with a view to making its review by BC EAO, the CEA Agency, Working Group members and the public as effective and efficient as possible.

The purpose of the EIS/Application is to provide the CEA Agency and BC EAO with information to prepare environmental assessment reports for the provincial and federal Ministers before they make their respective decisions under CEAA 2012 and BCEAA.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Limited Partnership (PNW LNG) will confirm that the EIS/Application meets the provincial environmental assessment requirements as set out in the final AIR, and any other relevant direction provided by BC EAO’s Project assessment lead.

1.2 Proponent Description Pacific NorthWest LNG Limited Partnership (PNW LNG) is principally owned by PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD (PETRONAS). At the time of submission of the EIS/Application Japan Petroleum Exploration Company (JAPEX) and PetroleumBRUNEI are minority shareholders in Pacific NorthWest LNG and its associated natural gas supply. PNW LNG’s engineering, procurement, construction and commissioning (EPCC) contractor will construct and commission the facility and PNW LNG will own and operate it.

In addition to the information requirements set out in the EIS Guidelines, the EIS/Application will provide a description of PNW LNG, including its management contacts and information about the company.

The mailing address for PNW LNG is:

Pacific NorthWest LNG Limited Partnership Oceanic Plaza, Suite1900 – 1066 West Hastings Street Vancouver, BC V6E 3X1 Telephone: (778) 372-4700 Facsimile: (604) 630-3181

All communications regarding the environmental assessment for the proposed Project should be sent to:

Michael Lambert, Head, Environment and Regulatory Affairs Telephone: (778) 372-4705 E-mail: [email protected]

PNW LNG has retained Stantec Consulting Ltd. (Stantec) to manage and prepare the EIS/Application for the proposed Project. The contact information for Stantec is:

Andrea Pomeroy, Project Manager Telephone: (778) 331-0201 Email: [email protected]

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 1: Introduction and Project Overview

February 2014


2

1.3 Purpose of the Project The purpose of the proposed Project will be described as set out in the EIS Guidelines. The EIS/Application will also describe:

The purpose of the proposed Project, including a description of how the project objectives are related, or contribute, to broader private or public sector policies, plans or programs, if relevant.

1.4 Project Location The facility would be located on Lelu Island in BC (see Figure 1). Lelu Island is federal land within the boundaries of the PRPA, the District of Port Edward and the asserted traditional territories of a number of Aboriginal groups. Lelu Island is a small island (~192 ha) approximately 2 km from the town center of Port Edward and 15 km southwest of City of Prince Rupert (see Figure 2). The facility would be approximately 160 ha and cover approximately 83% of the island. Lelu Island and its surrounding waters are located within the boundaries of the Port of Prince Rupert which is under the jurisdiction of the PRPA, a Canadian Port Authority under the Canada Marine Act and its regulations. The coordinates of the center of the facility would be:

Degrees - Minutes - Seconds - Latitude 54°11'58.02"N/Longitude 130°17'19.81"W

Decimal Degrees - Latitude 54.199451/Longitude -130.288836°

Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) - 415924 E/6006480 N (Zone 9).

An overview of the proposed site plan is provided (see Figure 3). This figure provides the general location of the facility, and marine terminal. The site plan may be refined as a result of engineering studies and ongoing consultation during the environmental assessment.

The geographic setting of the proposed Project will be described as set out in the EIS Guidelines. The EIS/Application will also provide:

The location of the proposed Project within a provincial, regional and local context, including maps. Coordinates of the proposed Project will be provided in WGS-84 and UTM coordinate systems, showing nearby communities.

1.5 Participants in the Environmental Assessment The participants in the environmental assessment will be identified as set out in the EIS Guidelines.

1.6 Regulatory Framework and the Role of Government The regulatory framework and role of the government will be described as set out in the EIS Guidelines.

77

97

97

37

16

97

BabineLake

QuesnelLake

Victoria

UNITEDSTATES

P a c i f i cO c e a n

Skeena River

ALBERTABRITISHCOLUMBIA

YUKONTERRITORY

NORTHWESTTERRITORIES

FortNelson

Fort St.John

DawsonCreek

PrinceRupert Prince

George

Vancouver

AtlinLake

KotchoLake

WillistonLake

StuartLake

OotsaLake

KinbasketLake

ChilkoLake

ShuswapLake

OkanaganLake

KootenayLake

LowerArrowLake

UNITEDSTATES

PacificNorthWest

LNG Project

2/17/2

014 -

9:59

:18 A

M V

:\acti

ve\12

3110

537\g

is\fig

ures\a

pplic

ation

_infor

matio

n_rep

ort\m

xds\e

nglis

h\fig_

1231

1053

7-279

_proj

ect_l

ocati

on.m

xd

Project LocationPacific NorthWest LNG

DATE:

DRAWN BY:

PROJECTION:DATUM:CHECKED BY:

PREPARED BY:

PREPARED FOR:

FIGURE NO:

1

Sources: Government of British Columbia; Government of Canada, NaturalResources Canada, Centre for Topographic Information.

Although there is no reason to believe that there are any errors associated withthe data used to generate this product or in the product itself, users of these dataare advised that errors in the data may be present.

FIGURE ID:

CityProject LocationProvincial Road or HighwayWatercourseWaterbody

0 100 200 300 400 500 km

17-FEB-14123110537-279K. POLL A. POMEROY

BC ALBERSNAD 83

1:9,000,000

StephensIsland

PorcherIsland

SmithIsland

KaienIsland

MelvilleIsland

DuniraIsland

BaronIsland

DundasIsland

RachaelIslands

C h a t h a mS o u n d

TripleIsland

Work Channel

KennedyIsland

Ferry Route

Lelu Island

WILSKASKAMMEL 14

Kitkatla

Skeena River

SKEENABANK

SKEENABANK

GAMBLECREEKECOLOGICALRESERVEDIANA

LAKEPARK

KHUTZEYMATEENPARK

Lax Kw'alaams

GeorgetownMills

Metlakatla

PrinceRupert

PortEdward

Haysport

Osland

PorcherIslandHunts

Inlet

OonaRiver

PortEssington

DOLPHINISLAND 1

TUGWELLISLAND 21

AVERYISLAND 92

S 1/2TSIMPSEAN 2

KLAPTHLON 5/5A

PA-AAT 6

KEYARKA 17

SQUADEREE 91

LAXKW'ALAAMS 1

ENSHESHESE 13TOON 15

FINLAYSONISLAND 19

BURNT CLIFFISLANDS 20

DUNDASISLAND 32B

CHANNELISLANDS 33

FAR WESTPOINT 34

NISHANOCKNAWNAK 35

KASIKA 36

KNAMADEEK 52

ENSHESHESE 53NDAKDOLK 54

MAGANKTOON 56

SPANAKNOK 57

MEYANLOW 58

SPAYAKS 60

16

GITXAALA NIILUUTIKSM/KITKATLA

ECSTALL-SPOKSUUT

SKEENABANK

KHUTZEYMATEENINLET

GUNBOATHARBOUR

KENNEDYISLAND

KTS'MKTA'ANI/UNION LAKE

LAX KWAXL/DUNDASAND MELVILLE

ISLANDS

KHYEX

PA-AAT

WOODWORTHLAKE

LUCYISLANDS

ZUMTELA BAY

KSGAXL/STEPHENSISLANDS

370000

370000

380000

380000

390000

390000

400000

400000

410000

410000

420000

420000

430000

430000

440000

440000

5960

000

5960

000

5970

000

5970

000

5980

000

5980

000

5990

000

5990

000

6000

000

6000

000

6010

000

6010

000

6020

000

6020

000

6030

000

6030

000

6040

000

6040

000

2/17/2

014 -

11:31

:11 AM

V:

\activ

e\123

1105

37\gi

s\figu

res\ap

plica

tion_

inform

ation

_repo

rt\mxd

s\eng

lish\f

ig_12

3110

537-2

80_le

lu_isl

and_

and_

surro

und.m

xd

Lelu Island and Surrounding AreaPacific NorthWest LNG

DATE:

DRAWN BY:


PREPARED BY:

PREPARED FOR:

FIGURE NO:

2

Sources: Government of British Columbia; Government of Canada, Natural ResourcesCanada, Centre for Topographic Information.Although there is no reason to believe that there are any errors associated with the dataused to generate this product or in the product itself, users of these data are advised thaterrors in the data may be present.

FIGURE ID:

Potential ShippingRouteLelu IslandAirportPilotage StationElectrical PowerTransmission LineFerry RouteHighwayRailway

WatercourseIndian ReservePrince Rupert PortAuthority BoundaryProtected AreaWaterbody

0 5 10 15 20 km


UTM - ZONE 9NAD 83

1:450,000

SmithIsland

DigbyIsland

AlwynLake

PorpoiseLake

SmithIsland

LeluIsland

StapledonIsland

KaienIsland

KinahanIslands

RidleyIsland

Skeena Dr

KitsonIsland

Inverness Passage

Tsum Tsadai Inlet


Porpoise Harbour

FloraBank

HorseyBank

AgnewBank

Wantage

Rd

Ridley Island Rd

Yellowhead Highway

16

16

Morse Basin

CN Railway

Ferry Route

DASHKEN 22

Port Edward

Skeen

a Dr

Ridley Island Rd

Hillcrest Ave

Ridley Island Log Sort

Prince Rupert Grain Ltd.

Fairview ContainerTerminal Phase I & Phase II Expansion

Ridley Terminals Inc.Canpotex Potash

Export Terminal

CN Railway

Prince Rupert Ferry Terminal

WatCo Pulp Mill

CN Railway

640560480

4003201608040

600

520440360280200

480

360

320

24080

40

320

560

520

480

440

400

360

320240

200

160

20012040

480400

200120

360280

80

280

200120

640

600

560

520

480400

320240

160

640

600

560 520

480

520

440360

680

440

400280

360280

240120

20016080

40

120

240

240

200160

80

280

720

680

640 600

40

80

40

80

80

160

640600

440

360

160

320

480

80

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

40

408000

408000

410000

410000

412000

412000

414000

414000

416000

416000

418000

418000

420000

420000

6002

000

6002

000

6004

000

6004

000

6006

000

6006

000

6008

000

6008

000

6010

000

6010

000

6012

000

6012

000

6014

000

6014

000

6016

000

6016

000

2/17/2

014 -

11:37

:47 AM

V:

\activ

e\123

1105

37\gi

s\figu

res\ap

plica

tion_

inform

ation

_repo

rt\mxd

s\eng

lish\f

ig_12

3110

537-2

81_p

lot_p

lan_a

nd_s

urrou

nding

.mxd

Project Plot Planand Surrounding Area


DATE:

DRAWN BY:


PREPARED BY:

PREPARED FOR:

FIGURE NO:

3

Sources: Government of British Columbia; Government of Canada, NaturalResources Canada, Centre for Topographic Information; Canadian HydrologicalService (CHS), 1995.

Although there is no reason to believe that there are any errors associated withthe data used to generate this product or in the product itself, users of these dataare advised that errors in the data may be present.

FIGURE ID:

Potential ShippingRouteProject ComponentTurning BasinPast, Present,or Approved ProjectContour (m)

Electrical PowerTransmission LineFerry RouteHighwayRailwaySecondary RoadWatercourseUrban Area

WaterbodyShoals

Agnew BankFlora BankHorsey Bank

0 1 2 3 4 km


UTM - ZONE 9NAD 83

1:75,000

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 2: Project Description

February 2014


6

2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed Project includes the construction and operation of a 19.2 million tonnes per annum (MTPA) natural gas liquefaction facility and marine terminal capable of receiving liquefied natural gas (LNG) carriers. At full build-out the facility would receive approximately 3.2 billion standard cubic feet per day (Bcfd), or 9.1 x 107 cubic metres (m3) per day, of pipeline grade natural gas, and produce up to 19.2 MTPA of LNG. The LNG would be loaded onto carriers to be shipped to Asia and other potential jurisdictions. The LNG carriers would use pre-established shipping routes into the Port of Prince Rupert using pilots and tug assistance (see Figure 2). The natural gas would be transported to the proposed Project via a new pipeline from northeast BC. The pipeline is a separate project that would be constructed, owned and operated by Prince Rupert Gas Transmission Ltd. (Prince Rupert Gas Transmission a subsidiary of TransCanada Pipelines Ltd.) and assessed independently under the applicable regulatory regime.

It is anticipated that the proposed Project will be constructed in two phases with the first phase having a design capacity of 12.8 MTPA of LNG with an additional 6.4 MTPA of capacity to be developed after the first two trains are operational.. Construction is expected to take approximately four years and the first phase of the proposed Project is expected to be operational by early 2019.

PNW LNG will provide the following in the EIS/Application:

A statement that the proposed Project meets the thresholds established for “reviewable projects” under the BC Environmental Assessment Act (BCEAA) and the thresholds met for the review under BCEAA.

A statement as to the application of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act 2012 on the proposed Project.

The purpose of the Project, including a description of how the project objectives are related or contributed to broader private or public sector policies, plans, or programs, this information will be included.

2.1 Environmental Design The EIS/Application will describe the design philosophies, standards and mitigations that have informed development of the Project.

2.2 Project Components The EIS/Application will describe the project components as set out in the EIS Guidelines.

An overview of all project components is provided below (see Table 3). The provincial environmental assessment will focus on those on-site and off-site components of the proposed Project as set out in the section 11 Order, these being:

Non-manufacturing Facilities:

A temporary camp that would accommodate 3,500 to 4,500 people and all related infrastructure, services and facilities

Temporary facilities (e.g., barge landing sites, access roads, off-site materials storage, etc.)


Application Information Requirements Section 2: Project Description


7

A materials offloading facility (MOF)

Bridge and road connecting Lelu Island to Port Edward.

LNG Facilities:

Feed gas receiving equipment including a pig receiver, pressure let-down station, metering station with telemetry, and inlet gas separator

Gas treatment equipment to remove any trace amounts of CO2, H2S, mercury, and water

Up to three identical 6.4 MTPA liquefaction trains (two to be constructed in Phase 1 with provision for a third train in Phase 2)

Gas turbines producing up to 1,100 MW of electrical and/or mechanical power, with a combination of options being considered as project components

Two or more nitrogen generation and vaporization packages with liquid nitrogen storage

Up to three 180,000 m3 full containment LNG storage tanks (two to be constructed in Phase 1 with provision of a third in Phase 2)

Instrument and facility compressed air system

Flare system for emergency, start-up hydrocarbon releases, and annual maintenance.

Marine Terminal:

A 2.4 km long conventional jetty supported by a trestle and including a control room, dual berths, and insulated cryogenic piping with loading platform.

Breakwaters may be constructed near the marine terminal.

2.3 Project Activities The EIS/Application will describe the project activities as set out in the EIS Guidelines.

An overview of all project activities is provided on the following page (see Table 3). The provincial environmental assessment will focus on those on-site and off-site activities of the proposed Project as set out in the section 11 Order, these being:

Construction Activities:

Construction, operation and decommissioning of a temporary camp that would accommodate 3,500 to 4,500 people at peak construction for the purposes of constructing the facility and all related infrastructure, services and facilities

Construction of an LNG terminal and related infrastructure up to the point of connection with the natural gas transmission line

Construction of the associated marine terminal

Construction, operation, and decommissioning of temporary facilities (e.g., barge landing sites, access roads, off-site materials storage, etc.)

Tree removal, vegetation clearing, peat removal, and general site preparation

Disposal of cleared vegetation, peat, waste rock, and overburden

Construction, operation, and decommissioning of a materials offloading facility (MOF)

Removal, transportation and disposal of dredged sediments


February 2014


8

Post-construction clean-up and on-site grounds reclamation

Commissioning of the LNG facility and marine terminal

Bridge and road construction connecting Lelu Island to Port Edward

Dredging, blasting and shoreline modification

Operation of LNG facilities, including maintenance

Shipping:

The operation of LNG carriers and other supporting marine traffic along the marine access route between the facility marine terminal and the pilot station at Triple Island.




9

Table 3: Overview of Project Components and Activities

Project Components and Activities

Description

Construction

Site Preparation (land-based)

Tree removal, vegetation clearing, peat removal, grading, and general site preparation within terrestrial project development area (including the facility on Lelu Island, the bridge, and road access to the mainland)

Onshore Construction Construction, operation, and decommissioning of a temporary camp that would accommodate 3,500 to 4,500 people at peak construction for the purposes of constructing the facility and all related infrastructure, services, and facilities

Excavating and pouring foundations, constructing of buildings, installation of drainage systems, and installation of utilities

Construction of:

LNG facility (and related infrastructure) up to the point of connection with the natural gas transmission line

Site fencing

Pipeline connectors for waste

Gas treatment infrastructure (acid gas removal unit, dehydration unit, and mercury removal unit)

Three 6.4 MTPA liquefaction trains

Three 180,000 m3 LNG storage tanks

Administration, control, and maintenance buildings

Water supply pipe from the Port Edward water system and a water distribution system

Wastewater treatment systems (for sewage and oily other effluent) and a pipe connecting the mainland and the Port Edward wastewater sewage treatment facility

Firewater system

Air emissions, noise, and light from use of construction equipment

Power generation (use of diesel/generators)

Construction of a two-lane bridge connecting Lelu Island to the mainland (including bridge footings on the mainland)

Vehicle Traffic Use of the two-lane bridge connecting Lelu Island to the mainland by construction workers and vehicles

Use of roads on and off-site

Air emissions

Dredging Dredging within the MOF and at the marine terminal


February 2014


10


Description

Marine Construction Construction of a two-lane bridge connecting Lelu Island to the mainland (including bridge footings in Lelu Slough)

Construction and use of the MOF

Pile driving

Berthing large roll-on-roll off barges and ships

Construction of the marine terminal

2.4 km conventional pipe pile supported trestle

Trestle and berth topside infrastructure including a control room, insulated cryogenic piping, pumping equipment, and LNG loading infrastructure

Two LNG carrier berths (capable of berthing two 217,000 m3 LNG carriers up to 315 m in length)

Loading and off-loading arms

Breakwaters may be constructed

Waste Management and Disposal

Disposal of cleared vegetation, peat, waste rock, and overburden

Wastewater treatment systems (for sewage and oily other effluent) and a pipe connecting the mainland and the Port Edward wastewater sewage treatment facility

Storm water management

Solid wastes (garbage removed from island)

Liquid wastes (effluents)

Hazardous wastes

Disposal at Sea Removal, transportation, and disposal of dredged sediments in Brown Passage (assumed)

Operational Testing and Commissioning

Air emissions

Noise emissions

Light emissions

Site Clean Up and Reclamation

Post-construction site clean up

Re-vegetation (if appropriate)




11


Description

Facility Operation

LNG Facility and Supporting Infrastructure on Lelu Island

Operate 24 hours per day, 365 days per year

Feed gas receiving equipment including pig receiver, pressure let-down station, metering station with telemetry and inlet gas separator

Gas treatment equipment to remove trace amounts of CO2, H2S, mercury, and water

LNG production and storage

Up to three identical 6.4 MTPA liquefaction trains (two to be constructed in Phase 1 with provision for a third train in Phase 2)

Two or more nitrogen generation and vaporization packages with liquid nitrogen storage

Up to three 180,000 m3 full containment LNG storage tanks (two to be construction in Phase 1 with a provision for a third in Phase 2)

Instrument and facility compressed air system

Storage and use of additional facility materials

Operation of gas-fired turbines capable of producing up to 1,100 MW of combined mechanical and electrical power

LNG facility maintenance and testing

Maintenance of equipment to ensure safe and reliable operation

Road and site maintenance

Inspection and maintenance of safety, civil structures, and environmental monitoring devices

Flare system for emergency, start-up hydrocarbon releases, and annual maintenance

Annual maintenance

Use of bridge and roads to the mainland

Increase in road traffic

Physical and chemical treatment of vegetation on Lelu Island and mainland

Marine Terminal Use 2.4 km conventional pipe pile supported trestle

Trestle and berth topside infrastructure including a control room, insulated cryogenic piping, pumping equipment, and LNG loading infrastructure

Two LNG carrier berths (capable of berthing two 217,000 m3 LNG carriers up to 315 m in length)

Berthing, hoteling, and loading LNG onto carriers

Loading and off-loading arms

Shipping Ship and tug activities (including moorage and transit) between the terminal and the Triple Island pilotage station

For the first phase of the proposed Project - approximately one LNG carrier every two days berthed at the terminal

At full build out - this would increase to approximately one LNG carrier per day and 350 per year berthed at the terminal


February 2014


12


Description


Solid wastes

Domestic wastes

Paper/cardboard waste

Wood and scrap metal from maintenance facility

Liquid wastes

Contaminated storm water or water contaminated in the LNG processes

Water discharge from steam or condensate blow-down

On-site management of run off and grey water

Hazardous wastes

Solvent or hydrocarbon contaminated wastewater and surface runoff

Mercury removed during the natural gas treatment process

Waste catalyst and adsorbents

Waste lubricating oils

Spent solvents

Waste biological treatment facility sludge (if sewage is treated on-site)

Minor miscellaneous wastes included used cartridge filters, batteries, etc.

Fish Habitat Offsetting Fish habitat constructed as part of the fish habitat offsetting strategy.

Wetland Habitat Compensation

Wetland habitat constructed or enhanced as a component of the wetland compensation plan

Facility Decommissioning

Dismantling Facility and Infrastructure

Dismantle/recycle facility equipment and infrastructure

Transport and disposal or recycling of materials

Dismantling of Marine Terminal and MOF

Dismantling and disposal of marine terminal and associated component parts

Waste Disposal Facility components


Preparation of the disturbed portion of Lelu Island for other industrial purposes or reclamation to restore ecological values in accordance with the federal crown land lease (PRPA/Transport Canada)

The EIS/Application will also provide the following information:

A description of why the proposed Project requires a provincial EAC

A description of the relevant history of the proposed Project

A description of the proposed project activities and physical works as summarized in Table 3

An overview of the following environmental mitigation measures that were incorporated into proposed project planning and the benefits of these changes:

Site selection

Engineering design features




13

Key project changes and refinements in response to feedback obtained from government agencies, Aboriginal groups, stakeholders, and the general public

A description of the capital construction phase and the lifetime of the proposed Project in years

A summary of the environmental management system and adaptive management approach for the proposed Project.

2.4 Alternative Means of Carrying Out the Project The alternative means of carrying out the proposed Project will be assessed as set out in the EIS Guidelines.

PNW LNG is evaluating a number of alternative designs and technologies for the proposed Project. The following criteria will be used to evaluate these alternatives.

Technical requirements to construct and operate the proposed Project, including related infrastructure

Economic feasibility of alternative technologies for construction and operation of the proposed Project, including associated infrastructure requirements

The potential effects of the alternative means.

A description of each alternative considered, and the methods and criteria used to evaluate each alternative will be included in the EIS/Application. The EIS/Application will assess the alternative options that are technically and economically feasible, and describe the rationale for selecting the preferred alternative.

2.5 Project Land Use The EIS/Application will:

Describe the land ownership and land use regime (for example, fee simple, Crown land, Indian Reservations, description of zoning, Agricultural Land Reserve designation, applicable Land and Resource Management Plans and other land use designations as applicable) including tenures, licenses, permits or other authorizations that would be potentially affected by the proposed Project, and report on the status of consultations with holders of such tenures and permits, and private land owners on resolving issues with tenure and permit holders.

Identify the Land and Resource Management Plans that the proposed Project overlaps, and list the relevant management objectives of the Land and Resource Management Plans (e.g., the PRPA 2020 Land Use Management Plan).

Identify existing and proposed management and monitoring programs or regional studies.

Identify other developments that may result in overlapping effects with the proposed Project.

Identify future developments that are reasonably foreseeable and sufficiently certain to proceed.


February 2014


14

Current and planned First Nations land and marine use plans, policies, and agreements provided to PNW LNG from First Nations will be referenced in the EIS/Application.

2.6 Federal Scope of the Project The proposed Project is a designated project pursuant to the Regulations Designating Physical Activities under CEAA 2012. The proposed Project meets the criteria listed under subsections 2(a) and 14(d) under the Schedule of Physical Activities included in the Regulations Designating Physical Activities (SOR/2012-147) and amended in the Regulations Amending the Regulations Designating Physical Activities (2013), which state:

2(a) The construction, operation, decommissioning and abandonment of a fossil fuel-fired electrical generating station with a production capacity of 200 MW or more

14(d) The construction, operation, decommissioning and abandonment of a new facility for the liquefaction, storage or regasification of liquefied natural gas processing capacity of 3,000t/day or more a liquefied natural gas storage capacity of 55,000 t or more.

The proposed Project exceeds the threshold listed in subsection 2(a) as it would include fossil fuel fired electrical and/or mechanical power generation options that would exceed the 200 MW threshold. The proposed Project also exceeds the threshold listed in subsection 14(d). The proposed Project would include the construction of a natural gas liquefaction facility with, at full build-out, a processing capacity of 52,603 t/d and a combined LNG storage capacity of approximately 248,000 t (depending on density) for all three tanks.

The CEA Agency issued final Environmental Impact Statement Guidelines (EIS Guidelines) on October 30, 2013. Taken together, the EIS Guidelines and AIR describe how PNW LNG will meet both federal and provincial environmental assessment requirements through a coordinated review process, in an effective and efficient manner.

2.7 Provincial Scope of the Project The proposed Project meets the thresholds established for “reviewable projects” under BCEAA pursuant to Part 4 of the Reviewable Projects Regulation (see section 11 Order) because the proposed Project includes a new energy storage facility with the capability to store an energy resource in a quantity that can yield by combustion ≥ 3 PJ of energy.

2.8 Applicable Permits and Regulatory Approvals The EIS/Application will:

List anticipated applicable local, provincial, and federal licenses, permits and/or approvals required for the construction, operation and decommissioning of the proposed Project and the associated responsible regulatory agency

Indicate if a request for concurrent permitting is being requested under the BCEAA pursuant to the Concurrent Approval Regulation (BC Reg. 371/2002).


Application Information Requirements Section 3: Summary of Engagement

February 2014


15

3 SUMMARY OF ENGAGEMENT

3.1 Provincial and Federal Involvement and Issues Tracking The EIS/Application will include the following information: A list of federal and provincial agencies/departments/organizations likely to be involved in

the environmental assessment, and their anticipated or confirmed roles A list of applicable federal and provincial milestones, including, for example, issuance of

section 10 and 11 Orders, working group meetings, and public comment periods An issues tracking document that describes issues and concerns raised, and the degree to

which these issues are considered resolved or addressed by PNW LNG or other parties during the preparation of the AIR and the EIS/Application.

3.2 Aboriginal Groups Information Distribution and Consultation

The section 11 Order identifies the Aboriginal groups affected by the proposed Project that will be consulted at all stages of the EA process. The EIS/Application will summarize PNW LNG’s past and proposed consultation initiatives with these Aboriginal groups. The EIS/Application will include information on consultation initiatives done in accordance with the provisions set out in the section 11 Order, as well as those consultation activities completed prior to entering the BCEAA process. An aboriginal consultation summary will be prepared to report on comments received during consultation with Aboriginal groups and the degree to which issues are considered resolved or addressed by PNW LNG and other parties during the preparation of the AIR and the EIS/Application. The EIS/Application will include the Aboriginal Consultation Report which will summarize consultation activities with individual Aboriginal groups in accordance with the section 11 Order. The Consultation Report will be shared with each of the relevant Aboriginal groups for their review, prior to its inclusion in the EIS/Application. Where the proponent and Aboriginal groups do not agree on the content of the summary of consultation activities, these areas of difference will be noted. Information on issues raised by Aboriginal groups prior to submission of the EIS/Application will be identified and discussed in the EIS/Application, as appropriate. The EIS/Application will include a table that summarizes Aboriginal issues and concerns raised during the consultation process, and how these were addressed by PNW LNG or other parties.

3.3 Public and Agency Information Distribution and Consultation

The EIS/Application will include the following information: A summary of the consultations with public and other key stakeholders, federal, provincial

and local government agencies A description of the means of information distribution and consultation used during the

environmental assessment including:

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 3: Summary of Engagement

February 2014


16

Public meetings and open houses

One-on-one meetings with interested parties

Publication of articles in the media, enclosures and community newspapers

Through interviews on local radio and television

Participation in community events

A summary of issues, concerns and interests identified during these consultations, and how these matters were addressed by PNW LNG or other parties.

3.3.1 Pre-Application Consultation

The EIS/Application will include the following information:

A report on consultations undertaken in the pre-application stage, covering both the preparation of the AIR and the EIS/Application, specifically:

A report on the consultations with public and other key stakeholders

A summary and/or report on the consultations with federal, provincial and local government representatives

An issues tracking document that identifies issues and concerns raised by the public and government agencies, and the degree to which these issues are considered resolved or addressed by the PNW LNG or other parties during the preparation of the AIR and the EIS/Application.

3.3.2 Consultation Planned During EIS/Application Review


A plan describing the public consultation program proposed for the EIS/Application review stage of the environmental assessment

A plan describing the proposed programs for consultation with government agencies

A description of the proposed methods and process to resolve outstanding issues.


Application Information Requirements Section 4: Scope of Assessment and Methods


17

4 SCOPE OF ASSESSMENT AND METHODS The scope of the federal environmental assessment for the proposed Project is defined in the EIS Guidelines. The scope of the provincial environmental assessment for the proposed Project is defined in the section 11 Order as:

Potential adverse environmental, economic, social, heritage, and health effects of the proposed Project, including cumulative effects, and practicable means to avoid, minimize, or otherwise manage any such potential adverse effects

Potential adverse effects of the proposed Project on an Aboriginal Group's Aboriginal Interests, and, to the extent appropriate, ways to avoid, mitigate or otherwise accommodate such potential adverse effects.

With respect to those parts of the proposed Project located on PRPA lands, the section 11 Order states that the scope of the assessment will take into account the scope of the environmental assessment to be conducted by the CEA Agency and focus primarily on consideration of its potential effects beyond PRPA lands including, but not limited to, the following:

Management of greenhouse gas emissions

Management of solid, liquid and hazardous waste

Air and water quality

Odour, noise, visual quality, and aesthetics

Human health

Community health and wellness

Health and social services

Housing and accommodation

Infrastructure, services and utilities

Transportation and traffic

Emergency services and preparedness

Employment and local businesses

Local recreation

Tourism and commercial recreation

Commercial fishing and other marine uses

Archaeological and heritage resources

Introduction of invasive species

Wildlife, wildlife habitat, and ecosystems.

The scope of the assessment may be refined by the project assessment lead in the course of the environmental assessment, taking into account advice from the Working Group and the assessment to be conducted by the CEA Agency to avoid duplication.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 4: Scope of Assessment and Methods

February 2014


18

4.1 Environmental Assessment Methods The assessment methods that will be used to prepare the EIS/Application are described in the following sections. These methods have been developed to meet the requirements of both CEAA 2012 and BCEAA in an effective and efficient manner. They are based on a structured approach which first identifies and assesses the potential project-specific effects and then the proposed Project’s potential contribution to cumulative effects. The scope of the proposed Project and the scope of the assessment will follow the requirements of the CEAA 2012 and BCEAA as set out in the EIS Guidelines and the section 11 Order.

In general, the effects assessment in the EIS/Application will describe the following steps:

1. Identification of potential issues and valued components (VCs) that are relevant to the proposed Project and the assessment

2. Establishment of assessment boundaries for each VC (spatial, temporal, technical, and administrative)

3. Description of the scope of assessment, including:

a. Regulatory/policy setting

b. Selection of potential effects

c. Measurable parameters and significance thresholds

d. Spatial, temporal, technical, and administrative boundaries

e. Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Use information, as available

f. Influence of consultation on the assessment

4. Description of baseline conditions

5. Assessment of project-specific effects including:

a. Identification of project interactions

b. Description of potential effects

c. Proposed mitigation of potential effects

d. Characterization of predicted residual effects

e. Significance prediction of likely residual effects

6. Assessment of cumulative effects:

a. Identification of past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects or activities that would likely interact in a cumulative fashion with predicted residual project effects

b. Preliminary assessment of cumulative effects

c. Detailed assessment of the potential cumulative effects, where necessary

d. Mitigation of cumulative effects

e. Characterize predicted residual cumulative effects

f. Analyze significance of the proposed Project’s contribution to cumulative effects.




19

4.1.1 Valued Components

VCs are aspects of the biophysical and human environment that if adversely affected by a proposed project, could be of concern to Aboriginal people, regulators, resource managers, scientists, or the general public. The VCs to be considered in the EIS/Application were finalized after consultation with members of the PNW LNG Working Group, input received from the public during the public comment period on the dAIR, and direction from BC EAO and the CEA Agency. The VC selection was also influenced by regulatory issues, guidelines, and the professional judgment of the assessment team.

The BC EAO guideline for the selection of valued components (BC EAO 2013) define Valued Components (VCs) as “components of the natural and human environment that are considered by the proponent, public, Aboriginal groups, scientists and other technical specialists, and government agencies involved in the assessment process to have scientific, ecological, economic, social, cultural, archaeological, historical or other importance”.

The proposed VCs were updated as feedback was received from BC EAO, the CEA Agency, members of the Working Group, and the public during the public comment period on the dAIR.

The EIS/Application will describe the rationale for selecting each candidate VC. Proposed VCs for the proposed Project are listed in Table 4. Table 5 lists each VC (along with subcomponents where applicable) and describes the potential adverse project effects and measurable parameters to be assessed for each VC. These VCs were identified with the aim of producing a comprehensive, concise, effective, and logical assessment that meets federal and provincial requirements, recognizing the likely concerns of Aboriginal groups and the public.

The following considerations were used to develop the VCs:

The EIS Guidelines

BC EAO’s Guidelines for the Selection of Valued Components and Assessment of Potential Effects

The VC must represent an aspect of one of the five “pillars” of BCEAA (environment, economic, social, heritage or health)

The VC must be a receptor and susceptible to adverse effects resulting from project-VC interactions

The nature of project-VC interactions must be clearly understood

Potential adverse effects on the VC must be meaningful and measurable

Potential adverse effects should be of concern to Aboriginal people, regulators, resource managers, scientists, and/or the general public

Discussions with technical experts and various provincial and federal agencies

Consultations with stakeholders and Aboriginal people

Review of and findings from recent studies or assessments in the region

Professional judgment based on experience of the assessment team

Benefits of grouping similar candidate VCs that are affected by the same or similar project effects under a common “umbrella” VC.


February 2014


20

For some of the VCs, subcomponents have been proposed to focus the scope of assessment. Subcomponents are aspects of a VC that are used to assess the environmental, social, economic, heritage or health effects.

The EIS/Application will include subcomponents for the assessment of potential effects on marine resources and on current use of lands and resources for traditional purposes. The subcomponents for marine resources include fish and fish habitat and marine mammals. The subcomponents for the current use of lands and resources for traditional purposes include harvested species, traditional use locations and access routes, and experience.

Based on the section 11 Order issued by BC EAO and the federal EIS guidelines issued by the CEA Agency, it is clear there are shared federal/provincial interests across many VCs. As a result, it is anticipated that federal and provincial technical experts will be providing input through their involvement in the Working Group to ensure that provincial and federal interests are being incorporated in an effective and efficient manner throughout the environmental assessment.




21

Table 4: Valued Components and Rationale for Inclusion in the EIS/Application

Valued Component Included/ Excluded

Rationale for Inclusion/Exclusion in the EIS/Application

Environment

Air Quality Included The Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 mandates the reporting of air emissions to the National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI).

Operation of the proposed Project will result in air emissions.

Exceeding the BC and National Ambient Air Quality Objectives (AAQO) can negatively affect human and ecological health.

Greenhouse Gas Management

Included The Project will have emissions of CO2e.

The BC Government’s Reporting Regulation – Greenhouse Gas Reduction (Cap and Trade) Act, 2009 requires reporting of greenhouse gas emissions from BC facilities emitting 10,000 tonnes or more of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions per year.

The Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 mandates the reporting of GHG emissions to the National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI).

Acoustic Environment

Included The BC Oil and Gas Commission (BC OGC) requires compressor stations and other oil and gas facilities to meet the British Columbia Noise Control Best Practices Guideline (2009).

Health Canada recommends consideration of noise effects for assessments of projects subject to federal regulatory jurisdiction.

Ambient Light Included Construction and operation of the proposed Project will result in an increase in ambient light.

Vegetation and Wetland Resources

Included The Species at Risk Act (SARA) protects federally and provincially listed plant species on lands within federal jurisdiction.

The Federal Policy on Wetland Conservation promotes conservation of wetlands and wetland function within areas of federal jurisdiction.

Emissions of NO2 and SO2 have the potential to result in ecosystem acidification (directly through fumigation and indirectly through effects on soil).

Aboriginal groups are concerned with effects on plants that have traditional use and cultural importance.

Construction and operation of the proposed Project includes activities that could affect rare plants, rare plant communities, and would affect wetland ecosystems.


February 2014


22



Soils Excluded The Project is not located within an Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR).

The soils affected by the project will be limited to the Project footprint. Standard industry practices for salvage and storage of topsoil will be undertaken and the Project will incorporate erosion and sediment control measures.

The effect on the quality of soils from potential acidification effects is being addressed under the vegetation VC because it is effects on vegetation that are the primary concern for soils acidification.

Terrestrial Wildlife and Marine Birds

Included The Migratory Birds Convention Act, SARA, and the Wildlife Act, provide protection to wildlife and specific wildlife habitats.

The Federal Policy on Wetland Conservation promotes conservation of the function of wetlands to provide wildlife habitat within areas of federal jurisdiction.

Aboriginal groups are concerned about effects on wildlife species that are hunted, trapped, or have cultural importance.

Construction and operation of the proposed Project includes activities that would result in effects on wildlife or wildlife habitat.

Freshwater Aquatic Resources

Included Recreational, commercial and aboriginal fisheries have significant value in BC.

The Fisheries Act regulates activities that may affect fish or fish habitat including introduction of barriers (s.20), modification of flows (s.20), permanent alteration or destruction of habitat (s.35), and deposition of deleterious substances (s.36).

SARA protects aquatic species.

There are 17 mapped watercourses on Lelu Island. Construction of the proposed Project could adversely affect fish and fish habitat.

Emissions of NO2 and SO2 have the potential to affect fish and fish habitat through changes in water quality from eutrophication or acidification of lakes.




23



Marine Resources Included Recreational, commercial and aboriginal fisheries have significant value in BC.

Aboriginal groups are concerned about potential effects on fish, marine mammals, shellfish, and seaweeds that are harvested or have cultural, ecological, or economic importance.

Marine components of the proposed Project include a bridge from Lelu Island to the mainland, a materials offloading facility, marine terminal (trestle supported jetty and berths), temporary facilities (e.g., a pioneer dock), and shipping LNG (between the terminal and Triple Island pilotage station).

The Fisheries Act regulates activities that may affect fish or fish habitat including permanent alteration or destruction of habitat (s.35), and deposition of deleterious substances (s.36).

In-water construction activities may result in increased sedimentation, alteration, or loss of fish habitat, and underwater noise.

The Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 regulates disposal of dredged material at sea.

Water Quality Excluded Air and effluent emissions may affect freshwater and marine water quality; these potential effects will be assessed within the Freshwater Aquatic Resources and Marine Resources VCs.

Economic

Economic Environment

Included BCEAA requires consideration of adverse economic effects. The potential effects of the economy from Project construction and operation will be assessed.

Local and regional governments and businesses are concerned that Project demands for goods and services will have adverse effects on the regional economy.

Municipal, provincial, and federal governments are interested in economic effects of major projects.

Social

Navigation and Marine Resource Use

Included CEAA 2012 and BCEAA require consideration of adverse social effects.

The Navigable Waters Protection Act regulates activities that may restrict navigation of waterways.

Construction and operation of the proposed Project may alter navigation and cause recreational, commercial, industrial, or traditional users to alter use of marine resources in the vicinity of Lelu Island.

Infrastructure and Services

Included BCEAA requires consideration of adverse social effects.

Potential for in-migration of temporary and/or permanent populations leading to increased demand for regional infrastructure and services.


February 2014


24



Visual Quality Included BCEAA requires consideration of adverse social effects.

All levels of government and many stakeholders are interested in the potential change to visual quality in the area.

The proposed Project would be visible from viewpoints within the vicinity of Lelu Island and the shipping routes (between the terminal and Triple Island pilotage station).

Odour Excluded Odour will not be a concern for the proposed Project because the gas used will be ‘sales quality natural gas’ and therefore will contain only a small concentration of reduced sulphur compounds, including trace concentrations of H2S. Methyl mercapton is normally added to sales quality natural gas as an odorant in the upstream pipeline for safety reasons but this will only be odorous in the event of a pipeline gas leak upstream of the facility.

Community Health and Well Being

Included Proposed Project may directly and indirectly affect community health.

Proposed Project may affect country foods availability and quality.

Health

Human and Ecological Health

Included BCEAA requires consideration of adverse health effects.

Construction and operation of the proposed Project has the potential to affect air, soil, and marine sediment quality, which may provide a pathway for uptake of contaminants in humans and ecological species.

Heritage

Archaeological and Heritage Resources

Included Archaeological resources on the mainland are protected under the authority of the Heritage Conservation Act in British Columbia. Archaeological resources on Lelu Island are managed by PRPA.

BCEAA requires consideration of adverse effects on heritage resources.

Heritage and archaeological resources are important to Aboriginal people.

Culturally modified trees (including those which post-date 1846) provide a record of traditional use of the land by Aboriginal people.

Construction of the proposed Project will result in ground disturbance and/or tree removal and has the potential to impact archaeological sites.

First Nations and Aboriginal

Current Use of Lands and Resources for Traditional Purposes

Included CEAA 2012 requires consideration of effects on current use of lands and resources for traditional purposes by Aboriginal people.

Construction and operation of the proposed Project has the potential to affect current use of the area.




25

Table 5: Valued Components, Sub-Components, Potential Adverse Project Effects and Measurable Parameters

Valued Component (and Sub-components where applicable)

Topics Addressed in VC Assessment

Potential Adverse Project Effects

Measurable Parameters

Environment

Air Quality Criteria Air Contaminants (facility and shipping)

Change in criteria air contaminant concentration levels within 15 km of the proposed Project; including Port Edward and Prince Rupert.

Concentrations of criteria air contaminants (CACs):

SO2, NO2, PM2.5, PM10, CO, VOCs and H2S.


Greenhouse Gases Emission of GHG gases (CO2, CH4, N2O, PFCs, HFCs, SF6)

Anticipated GHG emissions in relation to current provincial GHG emission levels and federal and provincial policies and targets for GHG reduction

Acoustic Environment Sound levels (facility and shipping)

Increase in ambient sound levels

Overall equivalent continuous A-weighted sound level

A-weighted Day (dBA, Ld)

A-weighted Night (dBA, Ln)

A-weighted Day-Night levels (dBA, Ldn)

Ambient Light Light levels from the facility

Change in ambient light Light spill- Light output from the proposed Project

Glare- The contrast between project lighting and background lighting

Sky glow- The ratio of upward directed light to total light


February 2014


26






Plant species at risk Ecological communities at

risk Wetlands and wetland

function Old forest Non-native invasive

species Traditional use plant

species

Change in abundance of plant species of interest

Estimated number of plants from the species of interest affected

Change in abundance or condition of ecological communities of interest

Area of ecological communities of interest affected (measured in hectares)

Change in wetland functions Area of wetland affected (measured in hectares)


Species at risk

Migratory birds

Traditional use species

Change in habitat Change in amount of habitat (quantified in hectares) of ecological communities and/or high or moderate suitable habitat identified for Endangered or Threatened SARA-listed species

Change in wildlife mortality risk

Qualitative estimate of increased wildlife mortality from the Project

Alteration of wildlife movements

Change in movement patterns related to placement of project infrastructure


Fish and fish habitat Change in (permanent alteration or destruction of) fish habitat

Area of fish habitat permanently altered or destroyed (measured in square metres)

Increased fish mortality Estimated number of dead and moribund fish that are linked to a commercial, recreational or aboriginal fishery

Change in food and nutrient content

Relative contribution of freshwater water output of the watercourses on Lelu Island compared to the output of the Skeena River




27





Marine Resources

(Fish and fish habitat, marine mammals)

Fish species that support or are part of a commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fishery (e.g., salmon, eulachon)

Fish habitat (e.g., eelgrass)

Marine species at risk

Sediment quality

Underwater noise

Change in (permanent alteration or destruction of) fish habitat


Increased fish mortality and injury of fish or marine mammals

Probability of injuring or killing marine mammals, or fish that are linked to a commercial, recreational or aboriginal fishery

Change in behaviour of fish or marine mammals due to pressure waves or underwater noise

Timing, duration, and intensity of underwater sound levels

Change in water and sediment quality

Estimated change in total suspended solids and concentration of contaminants

Economic

Economic Environment Key economic indicators

Cost of living

Labour market

Goods and services

Change in labour supply/demand within the LAA

Labour availability (persons)

Skill levels

Adverse changes to economic activity

Change in economic activity of other sectors

Adverse changes to municipal finances

Municipal revenue

Cost of services


February 2014


28





Social


Project Infrastructure

Marine traffic

Aboriginal, commercial and recreational fisheries.

Coastal recreation and tourism

Anchorages

Interference with marine navigation

Magnitude and duration of effect on navigation

Effects on fishing, recreation and marine use (including marine tourism)

Change in number and types of marine vessels as a result of the proposed Project (vessels/month)

Attribute data on marine uses along shipping channel (i.e., fishing, aquaculture)

Recreational activities/destinations overlapping with project infrastructure and project shipping channels (between the terminal and Triple Island pilotage station)


Housing and accommodations

Emergency response services

Community recreational resources

Traffic (roads, air and rail)

Transportation infrastructure

Domestic water supply

Sewage and water treatment facilities

Solid waste collection and disposal

Recycling facilities

Effects on community services and infrastructure

Number of workers and their dependents for each phase

Change in demographic composition

Demand and supply of community infrastructure and services (e.g., education, social services, etc.)

Parameters based on infrastructure and services affected (e.g., police officers/1,000 people)

Effects on traffic and pressure on transportation infrastructure

Daily traffic volume (vehicle/day)

Air traffic

Traffic incidents in Port Edward and Prince Rupert

Change in housing availability and affordability

Housing supply and demand (units)

Housing cost




29





Visual Quality

Visual condition (facility and shipping)

Change in visual quality Change in existing visual condition

Change in visual quality objective class

Change in landscape attributes contributing to visual sensitivity.

Community Health and Well-being

Health infrastructure and services

Community and family cohesion

Community health Health equity Demographic

composition Diet and nutrition

(related to country foods)

Change to social determinants of health

Population (demographics, rate of change) Education, employment and income Housing Community cohesion Physical and mental health conditions (e.g., drug and

alcohol use, divorce rates, increased gambling, etc.) Supply and demand of health infrastructure and

services Demand associated with physical health Demand associated with mental health Demand associated with health and safety site

inspections Recreation opportunities

Change in diet and nutrition Change in the composition of diets (proportion of country foods to market foods)

Health


Air Quality Country foods

Change in human health Concentration ratio (non-cancer health risks from inhalation or drinking water exposure)

Hazard Quotient (non-cancer health risks from food/dermal exposure)

Incremental Lifetime Cancer Risk (cancer risks from long-term exposure via inhalation or oral/dermal exposure)

Change in ecological health Risk Quotient (health risks to populations from long-term exposure via oral/dermal pathways; or health risks to community based on concentration in exposure medium)


February 2014


30





Heritage


Culturally modified trees (CMTs)

Historic sites

Archaeological sites

Alteration or destruction of heritage sites

Number damaged or destroyed

Alteration or destruction of archaeological sites


Alteration or destruction of culturally modified trees (CMTs)


First Nations and Aboriginal


(Harvested species, traditional use locations and access routes, experience)

Harvested species

Traditional use locations, access routes, and marine harvesting areas

Experience using lands and resources for traditional purposes

Changes to current use of lands and resources for traditional purposes by Aboriginal people

Quantitative changes in preferred harvested species

Changes in, or restrictions on, preferred identified harvesting methods

Quantity and quality of identified valued traditional use locations and access corridors where use or access to those locations is changed

Quantity, quality, and accessibility of similar alternate locations where traditional use of the land and resources remains unaffected by the proposed Project

Qualitative changes in the experience of using the land and resources for traditional purposes


February 2014


32

4.1.2 Assessment Boundaries

4.1.2.1 Temporal Boundaries

Temporal boundaries identify when an effect may occur in relation to specific project phases and activities. Based on the current proposed Project schedule, the temporal boundaries for the assessment are:

Construction: 2015 – 2018

Operations: 2019 – 2048+

Decommissioning: 2048+

Since the life span of the proposed Project is expected to exceed 30 years and depends on the supply of natural gas, information on effects from decommissioning and abandonment will be at a conceptual level and in accordance with the lease with the PRPA.

4.1.2.2 Spatial Boundaries

Local Assessment Area Boundaries

The spatial boundaries for each VC will include the geographic extent within which the potential environmental effects of the proposed Project are expected to be measurable. The local assessment areas (LAAs) used to assess the direct effects on each VC are listed below (see Table 6). The factors considered in defining the spatial boundaries were:

Scope of the proposed Project and scope of the assessment defined in the EIS Guidelines

The local and regional biophysical and socio-economic conditions

Available traditional use information and traditional knowledge

Available technical or scientific information

Social considerations.

For the environmental, heritage and health components of the assessment, the LAAs encompass the area in which both the project-related environmental effects can be predicted or measured with a level of confidence that allows for assessment, and there is a reasonable expectation that those effects could be significant. The LAAs for the economic and social components include the area where Project effects may interact with the socio-economic environment at a level where the effects could be significant. LAA boundaries are depicted in Figures 4 to 7.




33

Table 6: Local Assessment Area Boundaries

Valued Component

Local Assessment Area Boundary and Rationale

Air Quality The Guidelines for Air Quality Dispersion Modelling in British Columbia (BC MOE 2008) recommend that project effects representing 10% of the ambient air quality objective for the criteria air contaminants should be captured within the modelling domain. For all criteria air contaminants, the USEPA recommended CALPUFF air dispersion model usually determines this threshold to be within a distance of 10 km from the center of the facility footprint boundary for similar projects. To accommodate this recommendation the LAA for the air quality assessment will be a minimum of 30 km by 30 km square centered on the facility. The LAA may be modified to accommodate modelling results.


The boundaries for greenhouse gas management will be administrative. It will be assessed within the frameworks established by applicable provincial and federal greenhouse gas policy and legislation (i.e., those that apply to the oil and gas sector).

Acoustic Environment

The British Columbia Noise Control Best Practices Guideline (BC OGC 2009) recommends that nighttime sound levels from industrial facilities not exceed 40 dBA at a distance of 2 km from the facility or at the nearest receptor, whichever is closer.

To ensure acoustic emissions from the facility are fully characterized at various points of reception, the LAA is the area within 2 km of the proposed Project fence line and the shipping routes (between the terminal and Triple Island pilotage station).

Ambient Light Ambient light emissions from the proposed Project may affect individuals living in the community of Port Edward. The LAA for ambient light includes the area within 8 km of the proposed Project.


The LAA for the assessment of potential effects to vegetation and wetland resources includes Lelu Island, Stapledon Island (up to the landward edge of the high tide mark) the portion of the mainland southwest of Skeena drive across from Lelu and Stapledon Island


The LAA for the assessment of terrestrial wildlife includes Lelu Island and extends 1.5 km from Lelu Island and includes a 500 m buffer around the marine terminal. The LAA for the assessment of terrestrial wildlife includes Lelu Island and extends 1.5 km from Lelu Island and includes a 500 m buffer around the marine terminal. To account for potential effects from shipping, the LAA extends 2 km on both sides of the potential shipping routes between the marine terminal and Triple Island pilotage station.


The freshwater aquatic resources LAA includes the watercourses on Lelu and Stapledon Island potentially affected by the proposed Project.

Marine Resources The LAA for marine resources will include the Project development area, the potential shipping routes (between the terminal and Triple Island pilotage station), plus a 10 km buffer on both sides of the potential shipping routes to assess potential effects of underwater noise.


The LAA for the economic environment assessment consists of the communities within the mainland portion of the Skeena Queen Charlotte Regional District. This represents a large area where effects of the proposed Project may overlap with effects of other projects and activities in the area.


The LAA for navigation and marine resource use will include the Prince Rupert Port Authority boundary and the waters extending 10 km from both sides of the potential shipping routes (between the terminal and Triple Island pilotage station).


Infrastructure and services that could be affected by the proposed Project include those within the District of Port Edward and the city of Prince Rupert and Highway 16 up to and including the Terrace airport. These are most likely to be affected by the proposed Project.


February 2014


34

Valued Component

Local Assessment Area Boundary and Rationale

Visual Quality The LAA spatial boundary includes viewpoints within 8 km of Lelu Island and the potential shipping routes (between the terminal and Triple Island pilotage station).


The LAA for the community health and well-being will include the following communities: Metlakatla, Lax Kw’alaams, Gitxaala, the District of Port Edward and the city of Prince Rupert.


The LAA for human and ecological health is a 30 km x 30 km square area centered on the facility on Lelu Island. The LAA includes the area where potential effects to human and ecological health could occur from chemical changes to the environment, and increased noise and ambient light levels.


The LAA spatial boundaries for the archaeological and heritage resources assessment will be the area of ground disturbance (including pre-construction site clearing) within the proposed Project development area on Lelu Island, Stapledon Island, and the portion of the mainland southwest of Skeena drive across from Lelu and Stapledon Island


The LAA for the current use of lands and resources for traditional purposes will include the maximum extent of the LAA for air quality, marine resources, and human and ecological health.

Regional Assessment Area Boundaries

The RAAs for each VC are listed below (see Table 6). Factors considered in defining the spatial boundaries for each selected VC were the same as those for the LAAs; however, the RAA covers a larger area that establishes the context for the determination of significance of project-specific effects. It is also the area within which project-specific effects overlap with other activities (past, present, and reasonably foreseeable), and is consequently the area for which the Project’s contribution to cumulative effects is assessed. The RAA boundaries are depicted in Figures 8 to 11.

Table 7: Regional Assessment Area Boundaries

Valued Component Regional Assessment Area Boundary and Rationale

Air Quality To encompass baseline air quality and emissions from regional facilities that could interact with the proposed Project’s emissions, the RAA for the air quality assessment is established as a minimum of 50 km by 50 km domain centered on the facility footprint. The RAA may be adjusted to address modelling results.


As the assessment for carbon management is based on administrative boundaries, there will not be a cumulative effects assessment for this VC.

Acoustic Environment To encompass sound emissions that may emanate from surrounding facilities and interact with those from the proposed Project, the RAA for the assessment of sound quality is a buffer that extends 5 km from the LNG facility fence line and within 2 km of the potential shipping routes (between the terminal and Triple Island pilotage station). Because of the noise limits established by the BC OGC’s guidelines, sound emissions beyond this distance are not expected to result in cumulative effects.

Ambient Light To encompass light emissions from the surrounding facilities that may interact with the proposed Project, the RAA includes the portion of the viewshed greater than 8 km from the proposed Project site.


The RAA for vegetation and wetland resources is the Kaien Landscape Unit of the Central and North Coast Ministerial Order. This landscape unit includes similar ecosystems to those found within the LAA.




35

Valued Component Regional Assessment Area Boundary and Rationale


The RAA for the assessment of terrestrial wildlife is the Kaien Landscape Unit of the Central and North Coast Ministerial Order. This landscape unit includes wildlife and wildlife habitat similar to that found within the LAA. The marine component of the RAA includes the Prince Rupert Port Authority boundary and the waters extending 10 km to either side of the potential shipping route from the marine terminal to the Triple Island Pilotage Station.


The RAA for freshwater aquatic resources includes the waters within Chatham Sound that are influenced by freshwater from the Skeena and Nass Rivers (as defined by data from Trites 1956).

Marine Resources The RAA for marine resources will include the Project development area, potential shipping routes (between the terminal and Triple Island pilotage station), plus a 10 km buffer on either side of the potential shipping routes to assess potential effects of underwater noise.


The RAA for the economic environment consists of the communities within the mainland portion of the Skeena Queen Charlotte Regional District. This represents a large area where effects of the proposed Project may overlap with effects of other projects and activities in the area.


The RAA for navigation and marine resource use will include the PRPA Boundary and the waters extending 10 km to either side of the potential shipping routes from the marine terminal to the Triple Island Pilotage Station.


The RAA for infrastructure and services consists of the communities within the mainland portion of the Skeena Queen Charlotte Regional District and Highway 16 up to and including Terrace Airport.

Visual Quality For visual quality, the RAA includes the portion of the viewshed greater than 8 km from the proposed Project site.


The RAA for community health and well-being consists of the communities within the mainland portion of the Skeena Queen Charlotte Regional District.


The RAA for human and ecological health is a 50 km x 50 km square area centered on the facility on Lelu Island. The RAA addresses the area where potential project and cumulative effects to human and ecological health could occur from chemical changes to the environment, and increased noise and ambient light levels.


The RAA spatial boundaries for the archaeological and heritage resources assessment will the same as the LAA which is the area of ground disturbance (including pre-construction site clearing) within the proposed project development area.


The RAA for the current use of lands and resources for traditional purposes assessment encompasses the maximum extent of the RAAs for marine resources, air quality, and human and ecological health.

4.1.2.3 Administrative and Technical Boundaries

Where relevant, the EIS/Application will identify the administrative and technical boundaries for the selected VCs. Administrative boundaries might include specific aspects of provincial and federal regulatory requirements, as well as regional planning initiatives that are relevant to the assessment of the Project’s effects on a specific VC. Administrative boundaries are sometimes selected to establish spatial boundaries based on changes in regulatory requirements. Technical boundaries might include limitations in information, data analyses, and data interpretation relevant to a particular VC.


February 2014


36

4.1.3 Baseline Conditions

For each VC, the EIS/Application will include a description of baseline conditions. Key elements of this approach will include:

Requirements set out in the EIS Guidelines

Appending and/or referencing existing reports and documents as appropriate

Collecting, analyzing and presenting data following appropriate provincial or federal standards (e.g., Resource Information Standards Committee)

Providing rationale for the selection of sampling sites and analytical parameters, as appropriate

Discussing the quality and reliability of these data sources and how they are used to support the assessment

Incorporating available traditional knowledge (TK) into the EIS/Application, in addition to information collected through field studies, surveys, and other research methods

Describing field and laboratory methods, along with any quality assurance and quality control measures applied

Reference to any relevant provincial, regional or local land use and management plans (e.g., the PRPA 2020 Land Use Management Plan).

4.1.4 Assessment of Project-Specific Effects

4.1.4.1 Identification of Project Interactions

A key step of the environmental assessment will be to identify meaningful interactions between project activities or emissions and each of the selected VCs included in the AIR. If (as part of this first step) any VCs identified for inclusion in Table 4 are considered to be excluded from the environmental assessment, PNW LNG will seek the views of BC EAO prior to removal. The intent of this project interaction analysis is to identify where the higher risk interactions occur and focus the effects assessments on these interactions. The framework for the interactions matrix is provided in Table 8. Lower risk interactions will not be carried forward into the effects assessment/analysis.




37

Table 8: Potential for Substantive/Meaningful Project-Environment Interactions

Project Activities and Physical Works

Air

Qu

alit

y

Gre

enh

ou

se G

as

Man

agem

ent

Aco

ust

ic E

nvi

ron

men

t

Am

bie

nt

Lig

ht

Fre

shw

ater

Aq

uat

ic

Res

ou

rces

Mar

ine

Res

ou

rce

s

Ter

rest

rial

Wild

life

and

M

arin

e B

ird

s

Veg

etat

ion

an

d W

etla

nd

R

eso

urc

es

Eco

no

mic

En

viro

nm

ent

Nav

igat

ion

an

d M

arin

e R

eso

urc

e U

se

Vis

ual

Qu

alit

y

Infr

astr

uct

ure

an

d

Ser

vice

s

Arc

hae

olo

gic

al a

nd

H

erit

age

Res

ou

rces

Hu

man

an

d E

colo

gic

al

Hea

lth

Co

mm

un

ity

Hea

lth

an

d

Wel

l B

ein

g

Cu

rren

t U

se o

f L

and

s fo

r T

rad

itio

nal

Pu

rpo

ses

Construction

Site Preparation (land-based)

Onshore Construction

Vehicle Traffic

Dredging

Marine Construction


Disposal at Sea

Operational Testing and Commissioning


Operation LNG Facility and Supporting Infrastructure on Lelu Island

Marine Terminal Use

Shipping (between the terminal and Triple Island pilotage station)


Fish Habitat Compensation


February 2014


38

Project Activities and Physical Works

Air

Qu

alit

y

Gre

enh

ou

se G

as

Man

agem

ent

Aco

ust

ic E

nvi

ron

men

t

Am

bie

nt

Lig

ht

Fre

shw

ater

Aq

uat

ic

Res

ou

rces

Mar

ine

Res

ou

rce

s

Ter

rest

rial

Wild

life

an

d

Mar

ine

Bir

ds

Veg

etat

ion

an

d W

etla

nd

R

eso

urc

es

Eco

no

mic

En

viro

nm

ent

Nav

igat

ion

an

d M

arin

e R

eso

urc

e U

se

Vis

ual

Qu

alit

y

Infr

astr

uct

ure

an

d

Ser

vice

s

Arc

hae

olo

gic

al a

nd

H

erit

age

Res

ou

rces

Hu

man

an

d E

colo

gic

al

Hea

lth

Co

mm

un

ity

Hea

lth

an

d

Wel

l B

ein

g

Cu

rren

t U

se o

f L

and

s fo

r T

rad

itio

nal

Pu

rpo

ses

Wetland Habitat Compensation

Decommissioning

Dismantling Facility and Supporting Infrastructure

Dismantling of Marine Terminal

Waste Disposal



Section 4: Scope of Assessment and Methods


39

4.1.4.2 Potential Effects of the Project

For each VC, the mechanisms whereby specific project activities and actions are anticipated to result in effects on the biophysical and human environment will be described. Where possible, the spatial and temporal extent of these anticipated changes (i.e., where and when an effect might occur) will also be described.

4.1.4.3 Mitigation

Mitigation is defined as “any practical means or measures taken to avoid, minimize, restore on-site, compensate, or offset the potential adverse effects of a project” (BC EAO 2013). These changes may be in the temporal or spatial aspects of the proposed Project and/or the means in which the proposed Project will be constructed, operated, or decommissioned. Mitigation can also include specialized measures such as habitat compensation, replacement, transplant and timing considerations.

Mitigation measures that will reduce or eliminate an adverse effect will be described for each VC, with an emphasis on how these measures will help alter the effect. Where possible, the effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measure(s) will be expressed in terms of the expected change in the measurable parameter(s) for the effect. In some cases, mitigation may include monitoring programs to verify results or to monitor effectiveness of mitigation measures. A description of the mitigation measures that have already been incorporated into the site selection and design of the proposed Project will be provided in the Project Description section of the EIS/Application. These measures will not be reiterated in the VC assessments.

4.1.4.4 Characterization of Residual Effects

The following criteria will be used to characterize the residual effects for each VC. These criteria will be described quantitatively or qualitatively. Definitions will be provided when qualitative terms are used.

Context - refers primarily to the sensitivity and resilience of the VC. Consideration of context draws heavily on the description of existing conditions of the VC, which reflect cumulative effects of other projects and activities that have been carried out, and information about the impact of natural and human-caused trends on the condition of the VC. Project effects may be greater if they occur in areas or regions that:

Have already been adversely affected by human activities (i.e., disturbed or undisturbed); and/or

Are ecologically fragile and have little resilience to imposed stresses (i.e., fragile).

Magnitude - refers to the expected size or severity of the residual effect. Low magnitude effects may have negligible to little effect, while high magnitude effects may have a substantial effect.

Extent - refers to the spatial scale over which the residual effect is expected to occur.

Duration - refers to the length of time the residual effect persists. The duration of an effect can be short term or longer term.

Reversibility - whether or not the residual effect on the VC can be reversed once the physical work or activity causing the disturbance ceases.


February 2014


40

Frequency - refers to how often the residual effect occurs and is usually closely related to the frequency of the physical work or causal disturbance resulting in the residual effect.

The characterization of residual project effects for each VC will be presented in a summary table (see Table 9).

Table 9: Summary of Residual Project Effects

Project Phase Proposed Mitigation Measures

Residual Effects Rating Criteria

Lik

elih

oo

d

Sig

nif

ican

ce

Co

nfi

den

ce

Follow-up and Monitoring

Co

nte

xt

Mag

nit

ud

e

Ext

ent

Du

rati

on

Rev

ersi

bili

ty

Fre

qu

ency

Effect #1

Construction

Operation

Decommissioning

Residual Project Effects for all Phases

Effect #2

Construction

Operation

Decommissioning


Effect #3

Construction

Operation

Decommissioning


4.1.4.5 Likelihood

Likelihood refers to whether or not a residual effect is likely to occur. This may be influenced by a variety of factors, such as the likelihood of a causal disturbance occurring or the likelihood of mitigation being successful. The likelihood of a residual effect occurring will be described for each effect, and along with the characterization of the effects, will contribute toward a determination of significance where appropriate.




41

4.1.4.6 Determination of Significance

A conclusion on the significance of any residual project effects will be provided for each VC. Where possible, threshold criteria or management standards will be identified beyond which a residual effect is considered significant. Standards are recognized government or industry regulations or objectives for physical aspects such as air quality, water quality, or effluent release. These thresholds reflect the limits of an acceptable state for an environmental component based on resource management objectives, community standards, scientific literature, or ecological processes (e.g., maintenance of important wildlife habitat areas). Where standards or thresholds do not exist, significance criteria will be defined and justifications for the criteria will be provided. The EIS/Application will clearly indicate how or whether consideration of likelihood has influenced the determination of significance.

4.1.4.7 Confidence and Risk

The level of confidence will be provided for in each prediction which is typically based on expert judgment, and should characterize the level of uncertainty associated with both the significance and likelihood determinations. A characterization of level of uncertainty will be provided for each significance determination based on scientific information, statistical analysis, professional judgment, effectiveness of mitigation, and assumptions made. This will include consideration of the confidence and risk associated with the effectiveness of proposed mitigation measures. A description will be provided of any inherent risk associated with that prediction should risk exist. Any follow-up measures to reduce uncertainty will be described in the follow-up program described in Section 4.3.

4.1.5 Summary of Residual Effects

A summary of residual effects and their significance, based on Table 9 will be provided for each VC.

4.2 Assessment of Cumulative Effects The focus of the detailed cumulative effects assessment is on the incremental effect directly attributable to the proposed Project on the VC. The cumulative effects assessment considers the baseline effects that have resulted or are resulting from other past physical works and activities. Then, the cumulative contribution of the residual environmental effects of the proposed Project is considered. Finally, the cumulative contribution of other known and announced projects and activities (as determined by the project inclusion list [see Table 9]) is considered.

4.2.1 Project Inclusion List

The cumulative effects assessment will focus on the incremental effect on VCs that are directly attributable to the proposed Project. The cumulative contribution of all past, present, and reasonably foreseeable (those that are likely to occur) projects listed in Table 10 will be considered. Future projects and activities considered in the cumulative effects assessment will be restricted to those that:

Have been publicly announced with a defined project execution period and with sufficient project details for assessment

Are currently undergoing an environmental assessment

Are in a permitting process.


February 2014


42

The list of projects that will be considered in the cumulative effects assessment is provided below (see Table 10). New reasonably-foreseeable projects are those proposed following finalization of the AIR, but prior to submission of the EIS/Application, and will be discussed with the BC EAO to determine if inclusion is required.

Table 10: Preliminary Project Inclusion List

Project Description

Atlin Terminal The Atlin Terminal is a tourism center/dock for small ships in Prince Rupert. It is currently in operation.

Canpotex Potash Export Terminal

The Canpotex Potash Export Terminal and Rail, Road, and Utilities Loop is an approved project. This project is currently in the permitting stage.

CN Rail Line The CN rail line is currently in operation.

Douglas Channel LNG The Douglas Channel LNG Project is a proposed floating LNG export facility located near Kitimat.

Enbridge Northern Gateway Project

This is a proposed oil export terminal in Kitimat.

Fairview Container Terminal Phase I

The Fairview Container Terminal is a conversion from a bulk and break-bulk terminal to an intermodal container terminal. This is currently operational.

Fairview Container Terminal Phase II

This is the container terminal expansion to Phase I of the Project. It is approved and is in the permitting stage.

Kitimat LNG Terminal Project This is a proposed LNG export facility on Bish Cove, south of Kitimat.

LNG Canada Project This is a proposed LNG export facility in the District of Kitimat.

Pinnacle Pellet Inc. Wood pellet transfer (pellets brought in from Houston, BC), export (to Asia), and storage facility on Ridley Island.

Mount McDonald Wind Power Project

This wind energy project has an environmental assessment certificate but has not proceeded into the permitting or development phase.

NaiKun Wind Energy Project The cable landing for this offshore wind energy project is in the Prince Rupert Area. This wind energy project has an environmental assessment certificate but has not proceeded into the permitting or development phase.

Northland Cruise Terminal The cruise ship terminal is operational.

Odin Seafood This commercial seafood packaging facility is operational.

Prince Rupert LNG Facility This is a proposed LNG export facility on Ridley Island.

Prince Rupert Gas Transmission Project

This is the proposed incoming pipeline to supply natural gas directly to PNW LNG Project.

Prince Rupert Ferry Terminal This ferry terminal for BC Ferries and Alaska Ferries is operational.

Prince Rupert Industrial Park This industrial area containing a saw mill, car manufacturer facility, car mechanics shop is operational.

Prince Rupert Grain Limited This grain storage and handling terminal is operational.

Ridley Island Log Sort This dry land log sort is operational.

Ridley Terminals Inc. This coal, petroleum coke, wood pellets storage, and handling terminal is operational.

Rio Tinto Alcan Aluminium Smelter and Modernization Project

This is an approved project for a modernized facility to be updated and expanded the facilities smelter by 2014.




43

Project Description

WatCo Pulp Mill This project is for the proposed reuse of Skeena/China Cellulose pulp mill that is currently not operational – would ship metallurgical coal, grain, potash and other commodities.

Westcoast Connector Gas Transmission Project

This is the proposed incoming pipeline to supply natural gas directly to proposed Prince Rupert LNG Project.

4.2.2 Cumulative Effects Assessment

The EIS/Application cumulative effects assessment will focus on the incremental effect on VCs that are directly attributable to the proposed Project. The cumulative contribution of other known and announced projects and activities identified in Table 10 will be considered. Cumulative effects will be considered for each VC that is shown to have residual effects. The residual cumulative effects will be characterized and evaluated using the same criteria and significance thresholds established for the project-specific effects. Not all residual effects will contribute to measurable cumulative effects.

The cumulative effects assessment proceeds on an effect by effect basis, with a two-step process to determine the potential for cumulative effects on each VC. The first step consists of two questions:

Is there a project residual effect?

Does the project residual effect overlap spatially and temporally with the effects of other past, present or reasonably foreseeable future projects?

Where the answers to both of these two questions are affirmative there is potential for the Project to contribute to cumulative effects on a VC and the potential contribution of these project effects to cumulative effects is assessed. The second step consists of one question:

Is there a reasonable expectation that the contribution (i.e., addition) of the project’s residual effects would cause a change in cumulative effects that could affect the quality or sustainability of the VC?

Where the answer to this question is affirmative, additional assessment of the potential cumulative effects is described.

4.2.3 Description of Cumulative Effects

The EIS/Application will describe the mechanisms whereby the effects from the proposed Project interact with those from other projects and activities in the RAA are described for each VC. Where possible, the spatial and temporal extent of these anticipated changes (i.e., where and when an effect might occur) will also be described. Where possible, the cumulative effects will be quantified in terms of the degree of change in the measurable parameter(s) and the spatial and temporal extent of these changes (i.e., where and when the interactions between the project residual effects and the residual effects of other projects and activities are expected to occur).

4.2.4 Mitigation of Cumulative Effects

Measures available to PNW LNG to reduce any identified potentially adverse project cumulative effects will be described for each effect, including a discussion of how these measures might modify the characteristics of an effect. Mitigation measures that would require government action or a broader industry approach will be briefly identified but not discussed in detail.


February 2014


44

4.2.5 Characterization of Residual Cumulative Effects

Residual cumulative effects, after application of the mitigation measures, will be described. Where practical, the residual cumulative effects will be characterized by context, magnitude, extent, duration, reversibility, and frequency. The focus will be on the incremental effect directly attributable to the proposed Project.

4.2.6 Determination of Significance of Cumulative Effects

The EIS/Application will include a determination of the significance of the residual cumulative effects using the same standards or thresholds established for the effects on individual VCs. As with significant residual effects (Section 4.1.4.4), determination of significance for cumulative effects will include discussion of how likelihood has contributed to the determination, where appropriate. The determination of significance will also include a discussion of the confidence and risk based on:

Scientific certainty relative to quantifying or estimating the effect, including the quality and/or quantity of data and the understanding of the effect mechanisms

Scientific certainty relative to the effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures

Professional judgement from prior experience including tried and true mitigation measures.

Higher confidence in all three variables produces greater confidence in the effect predictions, assessment of significance, and the selection of mitigation measures.

4.3 Follow-Up Program The EIS/Application will identify and develop any proposed follow-up programs to verify the accuracy of the environmental assessment predictions and/or determine the effectiveness of any mitigation measures.

StephensIsland

PorcherIsland

SmithIsland

KaienIsland

DigbyIsland

MelvilleIsland

DuniraIsland

BaronIsland

LucyIslands


TripleIsland

Work Channel

KennedyIsland

Ferry Route

KinahanIslands

RachaelIslands

LeluIsland

Prince

Rupert Harbour

AlwynLake GAMBLE CREEK

ECOLOGICALRESERVE

See Inset Map

GeorgetownMills

DIANALAKE PARK

Prince RupertPort AuthorityBoundary

DianaLake

Metlakatla

PrinceRupert

PortEdward

PorcherIslandHunts

Inlet

TUGWELLISLAND 21

TUCKINLET 89

AVERYISLAND 92

S 1/2TSIMPSEAN 2

SQUADEREE 91

RUSHTONISLAND 90

EDYE 93

LAXKW'ALAAMS 1

BURNTCLIFF

ISLANDS 20

FAR WESTPOINT 34



ISLANDS

LUCYISLANDS



ISLANDS

KENNEDYISLAND

SKEENABANK

WOODWORTHLAKE

16

380000

380000

390000

390000

400000

400000

410000

410000

420000

420000

5990

000

5990

000

6000

000

6000

000

6010

000

6010

000

6020

000

6020

000

6030

000

6030

000

6040

000

6040

000

2/17/2

014 -

11:41

:36 AM

V:

\activ

e\123

1105

37\gi

s\figu

res\ap

plica

tion_

inform

ation

_repo

rt\mxd

s\eng

lish\f

ig_12

3110

537-2

82_b

iolog

ical_l

aas.m

xd

Biological LocalAssessment Areas (LAAs)


DATE:

DRAWN BY:


PREPARED BY:

PREPARED FOR:

FIGURE NO:

4

Sources: Government of British Columbia; Prince Rupert Port Authority; Government ofCanada, Natural Resources Canada, Centre for Topographic Information; ProgressEnergy Canada Ltd.Although there is no reason to believe that there are any errors associated with the dataused to generate this product or in the product itself, users of these data are advised thaterrors in the data may be present.

FIGURE ID:

Biological LocalAssessment Areas (LAAs)

Marine ResourcesVegetation and Wetland Resources& Freshwater Aquatic ResourcesTerrestrial Wildlife andMarine BirdsPotential ShippingRouteProject Component

Turning Basin

Airport

Pilotage StationElectrical PowerTransmission LineFerry Route

Highway

Railway

Secondary Road

Watercourse

Indian ReservePrince Rupert PortAuthority BoundaryProtected Area

Waterbody

0 5 10 15 km


UTM - ZONE 9NAD 83

1:300,000

LeluIsland

StapledonIsland

RidleyIsland

KitsonIsland

Port Edward

INSET MAP1:125,000

StephensIsland

PorcherIsland

SmithIsland

KaienIslandDigby

Island

MelvilleIsland

DuniraIsland

BaronIsland

DundasIsland

LucyIslands


TripleIsland

Work Channel

KennedyIslandFe

rry R

oute

KinahanIslands

RachaelIslands

LeluIsland

PrinceRupert

Harbour

AlwynLake GAMBLE CREEK

ECOLOGICALRESERVE

SkeenaRiver

ECSTALL-SPOKSUUT

DIANALAKE PARK Diana

Lake

WoodworthLakeShawatlan

Lake

TUGWELLISLAND 21

S 1/2TSIMPSEAN 2

LAX KW'ALAAMS 1

Metlakatla

PrinceRupert

PortEdward

Osland

PorcherIsland

HuntsInlet

Haysport

Oona River

GeorgetownMills


ECSTALL-SPOKSUUT

SKEENABANK

KENNEDYISLAND

WOODWORTHLAKE


16

380000

380000

390000

390000

400000

400000

410000

410000

420000

420000

430000

4300005970

000

5970

000

5980

000

5980

000

5990

000

5990

000

6000

000

6000

000

6010

000

6010

000

6020

000

6020

000

6030

000

6030

000

6040

000

6040

000

2/17/2

014 -

11:43

:00 AM

V:

\activ

e\123

1105

37\gi

s\figu

res\ap

plica

tion_

inform

ation

_repo

rt\mxd

s\eng

lish\f

ig_12

3110

537-2

83_p

hysic

al_laa

s.mxd

Physical EnvironmentLocal Assessment Areas (LAAs)


DATE:

DRAWN BY:


PREPARED BY:

PREPARED FOR:

FIGURE NO:

5


FIGURE ID:

Physical EnvironmentLocal Assessment Areas (LAAs)

Acoustic EnvironmentAir QualityAmbient LightPotential ShippingRouteProject Component

AirportPilotage StationElectrical PowerTransmission LineFerry RouteHighwayRailwayRiver or Stream

Secondary RoadIndian ReservePrince Rupert PortAuthority BoundaryProtected AreaWaterbody

0 5 10 15 km


UTM - ZONE 9NAD 83

1:350,000

StephensIsland

PorcherIsland

SmithIsland

KaienIsland

MelvilleIsland

DuniraIsland

BaronIsland

DundasIsland

RachaelIslands


TripleIsland

Work Channel

KennedyIsland

Ferry Route

Lelu Island

WILSKASKAMMEL 14

See Inset Map

Kitkatla

Skeena River

SKEENABANK

SKEENABANK

GAMBLECREEKECOLOGICALRESERVEDIANA

LAKEPARK

KHUTZEYMATEENPARK

Lax Kw'alaams

GeorgetownMills

Metlakatla

PrinceRupert

PortEdward

Haysport

Osland

PorcherIslandHunts

Inlet

OonaRiver

PortEssington

DOLPHINISLAND 1

TUGWELLISLAND 21

AVERYISLAND 92

S 1/2TSIMPSEAN 2

KLAPTHLON 5/5A

PA-AAT 6

KEYARKA 17

SQUADEREE 91

LAXKW'ALAAMS 1


FINLAYSONISLAND 19


DUNDASISLAND 32B

CHANNELISLANDS 33

FAR WESTPOINT 34

NISHANOCKNAWNAK 35

KASIKA 36

KNAMADEEK 52

ENSHESHESE 53NDAKDOLK 54

MAGANKTOON 56

SPANAKNOK 57

MEYANLOW 58

SPAYAKS 60

16


ECSTALL-SPOKSUUT

SKEENABANK

KHUTZEYMATEENINLET

GUNBOATHARBOUR

KENNEDYISLAND

KTS'MKTA'ANI/UNION LAKE


ISLANDS

KHYEX

PA-AAT

WOODWORTHLAKE

LUCYISLANDS

ZUMTELA BAY


370000

370000

380000

380000

390000

390000

400000

400000

410000

410000

420000

420000

430000

430000

440000

440000

5960

000

5960

000

5970

000

5970

000

5980

000

5980

000

5990

000

5990

000

6000

000

6000

000

6010

000

6010

000

6020

000

6020

000

6030

000

6030

000

6040

000

6040

000

2/17/2

014 -

12:04

:10 PM

V:

\activ

e\123

1105

37\gi

s\figu

res\ap

plica

tion_

inform

ation

_repo

rt\mxd

s\eng

lish\f

ig_12

3110

537-2

84_h

uman

_env

ironm

ent_l

aas_

set1.

mxd

Human Environment (Set 1 of 2)Local Assessment Areas (LAAs)


DATE:

DRAWN BY:


PREPARED BY:

PREPARED FOR:

FIGURE NO:

6


FIGURE ID:

Human EnvironmentLocal Assessment Areas (LAAs)

Current Use of Lands andResources forTraditional PurposesArchaeological andHeritage ResourcesHuman and Ecological HealthNavigable Waters andMarine Resource UsePotential ShippingRoute

Project Component

Turning Basin

Airport


Highway

Railway

Watercourse


Waterbody

0 5 10 15 20 km


UTM - ZONE 9NAD 83

1:450,000

LeluIsland

StapledonIsland

RidleyIsland

KitsonIsland

Port Edward

1:100,000Inset Map

H e c a t eS t r a i t

Kitkatla

UNITED STATESCANADA

LAXKW'ALAAMS 1

DundasIsland

StephensIsland

PorcherIsland

BanksIsland

MarkleIsland

McCauleyIsland

Pacific NorthWestLNG Project

Skeena RiverSee InsetMap

LaxKw'alaams

Georgetown Mills

MetlakatlaPrinceRupert

Haysport

PorcherIslandHunts

InletOonaRiver

Sandspit

Aero

Kincolith Mill Bay Greenville

Rosswood

Terrace

Rosswood

Kitselas

Usk

Pacific

Dorreen

Cedarvale

Kitimat

KitamaatVillage

Kildala Arm

Hartley Bay

BYERS/CONROY/HARVEY/SINNETTISLANDS ECOLOGICAL RES

NAIKOONPARK

FOCH -GILTTOYEES

PARK

GITNADOIKSRIVERPARK

KHUTZEYMATEENPARK

GWAII HAANASNATIONALPARKRESERVEAND HAIDAHERITAGE SITE

DOLPHINISLAND 1

BANKSNII

LUUTIKSM

GITXAALANII LUUTIKSM/

KITKATLA

K'MOODA/LOWE-GAMBLE

K'NABIYAAXL/ASHDOWNLAX KA'GAAS/

CAMPANIA

LAX KUL NIILUUTIKSM/BONILLA

LAX KWILDZIIDZ/FIN

MOKSGM'OL/CHAPPLE-- CORNWALL

MONCKTONNII LUUTIKSM

ALTY

ETHELDABAY-TENNANT

ISLAND

K'DISTSAUSK/TURTLE POINT

KTISGAIDZ/MACDONALD BAY

MAXTAKTSM'AA/UNION PASSAGE

STAIR CREEKK'WAAL

BISHOPBAY-MONKEY

BEACH

ECSTALLHEADWATERS

ECSTALL-SPOKSUUT

ECSTALL-SPARKLING

SKEENABANK

KHTADALAKE

KHUTZEYMATEENINLET

KENNEDYISLAND

KSI X'ANMAAS

KTS'MKTA'ANI/UNIONLAKE

LAX KWAXL/DUNDAS AND

MELVILLE ISLANDS

KHYEX

PA-AAT

WOODWORTHLAKE

MANZANITACOVE

KSGAXL/STEPHENS

ISLANDS

THULMEFALLS

WINTER INLET

WALESHARBOUR

KLEWNUGGIT

KITASOOSPIRIT BEAR

KT'II/RACEY

K'LGAAN/KLEKANE

Q'ALTANAASAALTANHASH

K'OOTZ/KHUTZE

CRABLAKE

EUROPALAKE

3716

16

113350000

350000

400000

400000

450000

450000

500000

500000

550000

550000

5850

000

5850

000

5900

000

5900

000

5950

000

5950

000

6000

000

6000

000

6050

000

6050

000

2/17/2

014 -

12:11

:48 PM

V:

\activ

e\123

1105

37\gi

s\figu

res\ap

plica

tion_

inform

ation

_repo

rt\mxd

s\eng

lish\f

ig_12

3110

537-4

26_h

uman

_env

ironm

ent_l

aas_

set2.

mxd

Human Environment (Set 2 of 2)Local Assessment Areas (LAAs)


DATE:

DRAWN BY:


PREPARED BY:

PREPARED FOR:

FIGURE NO:

7


FIGURE ID:

Project LocationHuman EnvironmentLocal Assessment Areas (LAAs)

Community Healthand Well BeingEconomic Environment


Visual QualityPotential ShippingRoute

Project ComponentAirportPilotage StationElectrical PowerTransmission LineHighwayInternationalBoundaryRailwayWatercourse

Indian ReserveProtected AreaUnited Statesof AmericaWaterbody

0 20 40 60 km


UTM - ZONE 9NAD 83

1:1,250,000

16

Skeena RiverSmithIsland

LeluIsland

16

S 1/2TSIMPSEAN 2

LAXKW'ALAAMS 1

Metlakatla PrinceRupert

PortEdward

Haysport

Inset Map1:750,000

StephensIsland

PorcherIsland

SmithIsland

MelvilleIsland

DuniraIsland

BaronIsland

DundasIsland


TripleIsland

Work Channel

KennedyIsland

Ferry Route

Lelu Island

Skeena River

UNITED STATESCANADA

Portland

Inlet

KLEWNUGGIT INLETMARINE PARK


FINLAYSONISLAND 19

SKEENABANK

GAMBLECREEKECOLOGICALRESERVE

DIANALAKE PARK

KHUTZEYMATEENPARK

16

Lax Kw'alaams

GeorgetownMills

Metlakatla

PrinceRupert

PortEdward

HaysportOsland

PorcherIsland

HuntsInlet

OonaRiver

Port Essington

Kitkatla

DOLPHINISLAND 1

S 1/2TSIMPSEAN 2

KLAPTHLON 5/5A

PA-AAT 6

KEYARKA 17

SQUADEREE 91

EDYE 93

LAXKW'ALAAMS 1

TYMGOWZAN 12

ENSHESHESE 13

WILSKASKAMMEL 14

TOON 15

SPAKELS 17

BIRNIEISLAND 18

KASIKSRIVER 29

UNION BAY 31

PRINCELEBOO

ISLAND 32

ZAYASISLAND 32A

DUNDASISLAND

32BCHANNELISLANDS 33

FAR WESTPOINT 34

NISHANOCKNAWNAK 35

KASIKA 36BILL LAKE 37

KNAMES 45/46

NDAKDOLK 54

MAGANKTOON 56

SPANAKNOK 57

SPAYAKS 60 KSAGWISGWAS 62

KSAGWISGWAS 63KYEX 64

IMKUSIYAN 65

IAKVAS 68


ALTY

ECSTALL-SPOKSUUT

ECSTALL-SPARKLING

SKEENABANK

KHTADALAKE

KHUTZEYMATEENINLET

GUNBOATHARBOUR

KENNEDYISLAND

KSI X'ANMAAS

KTS'MKTA'ANI/UNION LAKELAX KWAXL/DUNDAS

AND MELVILLEISLANDS

KHYEX

PA-AAT

WOODWORTHLAKE

MANZANITACOVE

ZUMTELABAY

KSGAXL/STEPHENS

ISLANDS

THULME FALLS

WINTERINLET

WALESHARBOUR

KLEWNUGGIT

365000

365000

380000

380000

395000

395000

410000

410000

425000

425000

440000

440000

455000

455000

5955

000

5955

000

5970

000

5970

000

5985

000

5985

000

6000

000

6000

000

6015

000

6015

000

6030

000

6030

000

6045

000

6045

000

6060

000

6060

000

6075

000

6075

000

2/17/2

014 -

12:14

:19 PM

V:

\activ

e\123

1105

37\gi

s\figu

res\ap

plica

tion_

inform

ation

_repo

rt\mxd

s\eng

lish\f

ig_12

3110

537-2

85_b

iolog

ical_r

aas.m

xd

Biological RegionalAssessment Areas (RAAs)


DATE:

DRAWN BY:


PREPARED BY:

PREPARED FOR:

FIGURE NO:

8


FIGURE ID:

Biological RegionalAssessment Areas

Freshwater AquaticResourcesMarine ResourcesTerrestrial Wildlife andMarine BirdsVegetation and WetlandResourcesPotential ShippingRoute

Project ComponentAirportPilotage StationElectrical PowerTransmission LineFerry RouteHighwayRailwayWatercourse

Indian ReserveProtected AreaWaterbody

0 10 20 30 km


UTM - ZONE 9NAD 83

1:650,000

StephensIsland

PorcherIsland

SmithIsland

KaienIsland

DigbyIsland

MelvilleIsland

DuniraIsland

BaronIsland

DundasIsland


TripleIsland

Work Channel

KennedyIsland

Ferry Route

Lelu Island

WILSKASKAMMEL 14

KLEWNUGGITINLET MARINE PARK


Skeena River

Kitkatla

SKEENABANK


DIANALAKE PARK

KHUTZEYMATEENPARK

Lax Kw'alaams

GeorgetownMills


PortEdward

HaysportOsland

PorcherIslandHunts

Inlet

OonaRiver

PortEssington

DOLPHINISLAND 1

TUGWELLISLAND 21

S 1/2TSIMPSEAN 2

KLAPTHLON 5/5A

PA-AAT 6

KEYARKA 17

SQUADEREE 91

LAXKW'ALAAMS 1


FINLAYSONISLAND 19


DUNDASISLAND 32B

CHANNELISLANDS 33

FAR WESTPOINT 34 NISHANOCKNAWNAK 35

KASIKA 36

KNAMADEEK 52

NDAKDOLK 54

MAGANKTOON 56

SPANAKNOK 57

MEYANLOW 58


KSAGWISGWAS63

KYEX 64

16


ECSTALL-SPOKSUUT

ECSTALL-SPARKLING

SKEENABANK

KHUTZEYMATEENINLET

GUNBOATHARBOUR

KENNEDYISLAND


AND MELVILLEISLANDS

KHYEX

PA-AAT

WOODWORTHLAKE

LUCYISLANDS

ZUMTELABAY

KSGAXL/STEPHENS

ISLANDS

THULMEFALLS

KLEWNUGGIT

BANKS NII LUUTIKSM

UNITED STATESCANADA

KSI X' ANMAAS

WALESHARBOUR MANZANITA

COVE

SKEENABANK

350000

350000

365000

365000

380000

380000

395000

395000

410000

410000

425000

425000

440000

440000

455000

455000

5940

000

5940

000

5955

000

5955

000

5970

000

5970

000

5985

000

5985

000

6000

000

6000

000

6015

000

6015

000

6030

000

6030

000

6045

000

6045

000

6060

000

6060

000

2/17/2

014 -

12:10

:44 PM

V:

\activ

e\123

1105

37\gi

s\figu

res\ap

plica

tion_

inform

ation

_repo

rt\mxd

s\eng

lish\f

ig_12

3110

537-2

86_p

hysic

al_raa

s.mxd

Physical EnvironmentAssessment Areas (RAAs)


DATE:

DRAWN BY:


PREPARED BY:

PREPARED FOR:

FIGURE NO:

9


FIGURE ID:

Physical EnvironmentRegional Assessment Areas (RAAs)

Acoustic EnvironmentAir QualityAmbient LightPotential ShippingRouteProject Component

AirportPilotage StationElectrical PowerTransmission LineFerry RouteHighwayInternationalBoundaryRailway

WatercourseIndian ReserveProtected AreaUnited Statesof AmericaWaterbody

0 10 20 30 km


UTM - ZONE 9NAD 83

1:650,000

StephensIsland

PorcherIsland

SmithIsland

MelvilleIsland

DuniraIsland

BaronIsland

DundasIsland


TripleIsland

Work Channel

KennedyIsland

Ferry Route

Lelu Island

Skeena River

UNITED STATESCANADA

KLEWNUGGIT INLETMARINE PARK


FINLAYSONISLAND 19

SKEENABANK

See Inset Map


DIANALAKE PARK

KHUTZEYMATEENPARK

16

Lax Kw'alaams

GeorgetownMills

Metlakatla

PrinceRupert

PortEdward

HaysportOsland

PorcherIsland

HuntsInlet

OonaRiver

Port Essington

KitkatlaDOLPHINISLAND 1

S 1/2TSIMPSEAN 2

KLAPTHLON 5/5A

PA-AAT 6

KEYARKA 17

SQUADEREE 91

EDYE 93

LAXKW'ALAAMS 1

TYMGOWZAN 12

ENSHESHESE 13

WILSKASKAMMEL 14

TOON 15

SPAKELS 17

BIRNIEISLAND 18

KASIKSRIVER 29

UNION BAY 31

PRINCELEBOO

ISLAND 32

ZAYASISLAND 32A

DUNDASISLAND

32BCHANNELISLANDS 33

FAR WESTPOINT 34 NISHANOCKNAWNAK 35

KASIKA 36BILL LAKE 37

NDAKDOLK 54

MAGANKTOON 56

SPANAKNOK 57


KSAGWISGWAS 63

KYEX 64

IMKUSIYAN 65

IAKVAS 68


ALTY

ECSTALL-SPOKSUUT

ECSTALL-SPARKLING

SKEENABANK

KHTADALAKE

KHUTZEYMATEENINLET

GUNBOATHARBOUR

KENNEDYISLAND

KSI X'ANMAAS


AND MELVILLEISLANDS

KHYEX

PA-AAT

WOODWORTHLAKE

ZUMTELABAY

KSGAXL/STEPHENS

ISLANDS

THULME FALLS

WALESHARBOUR

16

365000

365000

380000

380000

395000

395000

410000

410000

425000

425000

440000

440000

455000

4550005940

000

5940

000

5955

000

5955

000

5970

000

5970

000

5985

000

5985

000

6000

000

6000

000

6015

000

6015

000

6030

000

6030

000

6045

000

6045

000

2/17/2

014 -

12:13

:50 PM

V:

\activ

e\123

1105

37\gi

s\figu

res\ap

plica

tion_

inform

ation

_repo

rt\mxd

s\eng

lish\f

ig_12

3110

537-2

87_h

uman

_env

ironm

ent_r

aas_

set1.

mxd

Human Environment (Set 1 of 2)Regional Assessment Areas (RAAs)


DATE:

DRAWN BY:


PREPARED BY:

PREPARED FOR:

FIGURE NO:

10


FIGURE ID:

Human EnvironmentRegional Assessment Areas (RAAs)

Current Use of Landsand Resources forTraditional PurposesArchaeological andHeritage ResourcesHuman and Ecological HealthNavigable Waters andMarine Resource UsePotential ShippingRoute

Project Component

Turning Basin

Airport


Highway

Railway

Watercourse


Waterbody

0 5 10 15 20 km


UTM - ZONE 9NAD 83

1:550,000

LeluIsland

StapledonIsland

RidleyIsland

KitsonIsland


Port Edward

Inset Map1:100,000


Kitkatla

UNITED STATESCANADA

LAXKW'ALAAMS 1

DundasIsland

StephensIsland

PorcherIsland

BanksIsland

MarkleIsland

McCauleyIsland

Pacific NorthWestLNG Project

Skeena River

LaxKw'alaams

Georgetown Mills


Haysport

PorcherIslandHunts

Inlet

OonaRiver

Sandspit

Aero

Kincolith Mill Bay Greenville

Rosswood

Terrace

Rosswood

Kitselas

Usk

Pacific

Dorreen

Cedarvale

Kitimat

KitamaatVillage

Kildala Arm

Hartley Bay

BYERS/CONROY/HARVEY/SINNETTISLANDS ECOLOGICAL RES

NAIKOONPARK

FOCH -GILTTOYEES

PARK

GITNADOIKSRIVERPARK

KHUTZEYMATEENPARK

GWAII HAANASNATIONALPARKRESERVEAND HAIDAHERITAGE SITE

DOLPHINISLAND 1

BANKSNII

LUUTIKSM

GITXAALANII LUUTIKSM/

KITKATLA

K'MOODA/LOWE-GAMBLE

K'NABIYAAXL/ASHDOWNLAX KA'GAAS/

CAMPANIA

LAX KUL NIILUUTIKSM/BONILLA

LAX KWILDZIIDZ/FIN

MOKSGM'OL/CHAPPLE-- CORNWALL

MONCKTONNII LUUTIKSM

ALTY

ETHELDABAY-TENNANT

ISLAND

K'DISTSAUSK/TURTLE POINT

KTISGAIDZ/MACDONALD BAY

MAXTAKTSM'AA/UNION PASSAGE

STAIR CREEKK'WAAL

BISHOPBAY-MONKEY

BEACH

ECSTALLHEADWATERS

ECSTALL-SPOKSUUT

ECSTALL-SPARKLING

SKEENABANK

KHTADALAKE

KHUTZEYMATEENINLET

KENNEDYISLAND

KSI X'ANMAAS

KTS'MKTA'ANI/UNIONLAKE

LAX KWAXL/DUNDAS AND

MELVILLE ISLANDSKHYEX

PA-AAT

WOODWORTHLAKE

MANZANITACOVE

KSGAXL/STEPHENS

ISLANDS

THULMEFALLS

WINTER INLET

WALESHARBOUR

KLEWNUGGIT

KITASOOSPIRIT BEAR

KT'II/RACEY

K'LGAAN/KLEKANE

Q'ALTANAASAALTANHASH

K'OOTZ/KHUTZE

CRABLAKE

EUROPALAKE

37

16

16

113

350000

350000

400000

400000

450000

450000

500000

500000

550000

550000

5850

000

5850

000

5900

000

5900

000

5950

000

5950

000

6000

000

6000

000

6050

000

6050

000

6100

000

6100

000

2/17/2

014 -

12:11

:10 PM

V:

\activ

e\123

1105

37\gi

s\figu

res\ap

plica

tion_

inform

ation

_repo

rt\mxd

s\eng

lish\f

ig_12

3110

537-4

27_h

uman

_env

ironm

ent_r

aas_

set2.

mxd

Human Environment (Set 2 of 2)Regional Assessment Areas (RAAs)


DATE:

DRAWN BY:


PREPARED BY:

PREPARED FOR:

FIGURE NO:

11


FIGURE ID:

Project LocationHuman EnvironmentRegional Assessment Areas (RAAs)

Community Health and Well Being& Economic EnvironmentInfrastructure and ServicesVisual QualityPotential ShippingRoute

AirportPilotage StationElectrical PowerTransmission LineHighwayInternationalBoundaryRailwayWatercourse

Indian ReserveProtected AreaUnited Statesof AmericaWaterbody

0 20 40 60 km


UTM - ZONE 9NAD 83

1:1,250,000

16


Section 5: Existing Environment


53

5 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT The existing biophysical and human environment will be described as set out in the EIS Guidelines.

The EIS/Application will include a general description of the existing biophysical and human environment including the surrounding regional area. Project-specific studies will be described in detail within baseline conditions section of each VC chapter.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 6: Air Quality

February 2014


54

6 AIR QUALITY

6.1 Introduction The EIS/Application will introduce the air quality assessment, describe the rationale for selecting air quality as a VC and identify linkages to other sections of the EIS/Application. Air quality refers to the ambient environment in the vicinity of the proposed Project site. Interactions between the proposed Project and ambient air quality are expected because of the air contaminant contributions to the receiving environment that would occur during construction and operation phases. Results from the air quality assessment will also inform the vegetation, wildlife, freshwater aquatic, and health assessments.

6.2 Scope of Assessment The air quality assessment will focus on the emissions sources (routine and abnormal) associated with the proposed Project, including the construction and operation of the LNG facility, marine terminal, associated infrastructure, and shipping activities (between the terminal and Triple Island pilotage station). The EIS/Application will include a description of legislation, guidelines, best management practices, and guidance documents that are relevant to management of air quality.

The Guidelines for Air Quality Dispersion Modeling in British Columbia (BC MOE 2008) recommends that project effects representing 10% of the ambient air quality objective for the criteria air contaminants should be captured within the modeling domain. For all criteria air contaminants, results of the CALPUFF air dispersion model will determine the distance of this threshold from the center of the LNG facility. Usually the threshold is reached within 10 km from the center of the LNG facility. However, to ensure Prince Rupert is included within the assessment area, the LAA for the air quality assessment is a 30 km by 30 km square centered on Lelu Island. The RAA is a 50 km by 50 km square centered on the LNG facility. The LAA and RAA will be adjusted as needed depending on the model results.

The assessment will also define technical boundaries that include limitations in scientific information, data analyses, and interpretation.

6.3 Baseline Conditions Baseline conditions will be described as set out in the EIS Guidelines. The EIS/Application will provide the following information to characterize current conditions:

Regional climate

Baseline ambient air quality.

The dispersion modeling technical data report will be included as an Appendix to the EIS/Application. It will include the following details:

Existing regional facilities and their emissions

Project-related emissions

Dispersion modeling of selected substances of interest for base, project, and application (base + project) cases.


Section 6: Air Quality


55

6.4 Effects Assessment The effects assessment will be completed according to the methods outlined in the EIS Guidelines and described in Section 4.1.4 of this document. This will include:

Analytical methods

Assessment of potential effects

Mitigation

Characterization of residual effects

Determination of significance.

Table 11 provides a summary of the potential effects of the proposed Project on air quality that will be considered in the assessment and the measurable parameters that will be used to quantify these effects. The measurable parameters used to assess potential effects are based on criteria air contaminants listed in the BC and Canada regulatory ambient air quality objectives.

Information from dispersion modeling will be used to facilitate the assessment of potential acidification of ecosystems (see Section 10). A screening level assessment will be completed and carried forward if a full acidification assessment is required.

Table 11: Potential Effects on Air Quality

Potential Adverse Effects Measurable Parameters

Increase in criteria air contaminant concentration levels within 15 km of the proposed Project; including Port Edward and Prince Rupert.

Concentrations of criteria air contaminants (CACs):

SO2, NO2, PM2.5, PM10, CO, VOCs and H2S.

6.5 Cumulative Effects The EIS/Application will identify the foreseeable future projects that may affect the regional air quality. A cumulative effects assessment will include the:

Methods and rationale used to identify these other developments

Descriptions of any potential adverse effects to air quality resulting from these developments.

The effects of the future cases will be aggregated with the proposed Project and baseline cases to assess the cumulative effects within the RAA. The significance of predicted potential cumulative effects and the proposed Project contribution to cumulative effects will then be assessed using the methods outlined in Section 4.2.

6.6 Conclusion This section of the EIS/Application will include a brief summary of the predicted residual effects and cumulative effects of the proposed Project on air quality and a conclusion on the significance of these effects.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 7: Greenhouse Gas Management

February 2014


56

7 GREENHOUSE GAS MANAGEMENT

7.1 Introduction The EIS/Application will introduce the greenhouse gas management section and describe the rationale for its inclusion in the EIS/Application. GHG management refers to the measurement and management of GHGs, namely CO2, CH4, N2O, PFCs, HFCs and SF6 emitted from the facility. The proposed Project’s GHG emissions of concern will be quantified for the construction and operation phase of the Project.

7.2 Scope of Assessment The GHG management section will focus on the emission sources associated with the Project construction and operation of the natural gas liquefaction process. The EIS/Application will include a description of legislation, guidelines, best management practices, and guidance documents that are relevant to GHG management. The EIS/Application will discuss anticipated GHG emissions of the proposed Project in relation to federal and provincial policies and targets for GHG reduction, such as British Columbia’s Climate Action Plan.

7.3 Baseline Conditions The EIS/Application will provide information on provincial and federal GHG policy and legislation. It will also provide information on current provincial and federal GHG emission levels.

7.4 Effects Assessment The effects assessment will be completed according to the methods outlined in the EIS Guidelines. This will include an assessment of effects on GHG reduction targets and GHG management options for the proposed Project.

7.5 Conclusion This section of the EIS/Application will include a brief summary of greenhouse gas management for the Project and a conclusion on the effects on provincial and federal GHG reduction targets.


Section 8: Acoustic Environment


57

8 ACOUSTIC ENVIRONMENT

8.1 Introduction The EIS/Application will introduce the acoustic environment assessment, describe the rationale for its selection as a VC, and identify linkages to other sections of the EIS/Application (e.g., wildlife and health). Interactions between the proposed Project and acoustic environment are expected because of a variety of activities during construction, such as operation of heavy equipment and pile driving, and during operation of the LNG facility itself.

8.2 Scope of Assessment The EIS/Application will quantify acoustic emissions associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project. A major emphasis in the assessment will be on emissions generated by gas processing and liquefaction equipment, and power generation. Residents of the town of Port Edward live within 1 km of the proposed Project. At the time of the assessment, any permanent or seasonal residences, First Nations reserves and temporary use areas within 2 km of the proposed Project boundary, such as cabins, ceremonial use areas, fishing and hunting camps, would be identified as sensitive receptors.

The EIS/Application will include a description of the British Columbia Noise Control Best Practices Guideline (BC OGC 2009), and any other legislation, guidelines, best management practices, and guidance documents that are relevant to management of noise levels. It will also expand on the rationale for the spatial boundaries provided in Table 6 and Table 7.

8.3 Baseline Conditions Baseline conditions will be described as set out in the EIS Guidelines.


Analytical methods


Mitigation



Table 12 provides a summary of the potential effects of the proposed Project on the acoustic environment that will be included in the assessment and the measurable parameters that will be used to quantify these effects. Project effects will be greatest during operation of the proposed Project, when emissions would be generated by gas processing and liquefaction equipment and power generation.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 8: Acoustic Environment

February 2014


58

Table 12: Potential Effects on Acoustic Environment


Increase in ambient sound levels Overall equivalent continuous A-weighted sound level

A-weighted Day (dBA, Ld)

A-weighted Night (dBA, Ln)

A-weighted Day-Night levels (dBA, Ldn)

Significant sources of noise will be identified, described and quantified in terms of noise emissions. Subsequently, sound levels over the entire LAA and at the identified receptors will be calculated for the proposed Project in accordance with the procedures stipulated by the BC OGC’s British Columbia Noise Control Best Practices Guideline. Operational noise level predictions will be made using Cadna/A computer modeling software, or another proven computational tool. Acoustic modeling will be conducted in accordance with the ISO 9613 standard (propagation standard commonly accepted by numerous regulatory bodies and noise practitioners). The modeling results will be used to assess compliance with the guideline. Appropriate mitigation measures will be recommended, as may be required to achieve compliance and/or reduce area noise effects.

8.5 Cumulative Effects An assessment of the proposed Project’s potential contributions to cumulative effects on the acoustic environment will be provided using the methods outlined in Section 4.2.

8.6 Conclusion This section of the EIS/Application will include a brief summary of the predicted residual effects and cumulative effects of the proposed Project on the acoustic environment and a conclusion on the significance of these effects.


Section 9: Ambient Light


59

9 AMBIENT LIGHT

9.1 Introduction The EIS/Application will introduce the ambient light assessment, describe the rationale for its selection as a VC, and identify linkages to other sections of the EIS/Application (e.g., wildlife and health). Interactions between the proposed Project and ambient light are expected because of the light sources expected to be in use for the proposed Project.

9.2 Scope of Assessment The EIS/Application will describe the light emissions associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project (including light from LNG carriers from shipping between the terminal and Triple Island pilotage station). The emphasis will be on light sources in use during operation as lighting would be needed to ensure safe work conditions during nighttime hours and to provide security for the workers and the facility. The EIS/Application will consider the potential effect that project lighting could have on the existing ambient light levels surrounding the proposed Project.



Analytical methods


Mitigation



Table 13 provides a summary of the potential effects of the proposed Project on ambient light that will be included in the assessment and the measurable parameters that will be used to quantify these effects. Potential project effects on ambient light will be characterized in context of baseline conditions. Appropriate mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce potential effects from the proposed Project.

Table 13: Potential Effects on Ambient Light


Change in ambient light Light spill- Light output from the proposed Project

Glare- The contrast between project lighting and background lighting

Sky glow- The ratio of upward directed light to total light

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 9: Ambient Light

February 2014


60

9.5 Cumulative Effects An assessment of the proposed Project’s potential contributions to cumulative effects on ambient light will be provided using the methods outlined in Section 4.2.

9.6 Conclusion This section of the EIS/Application will include a brief summary of the predicted residual effects and cumulative effects of the proposed Project on the ambient light and a conclusion on the significance of these effects.


Section 10: Vegetation and Wetland Resources


61

10 VEGETATION AND WETLAND RESOURCES

10.1 Introduction The EIS/Application will introduce the vegetation and wetland resources assessment, describe the rationale for its selection as a VC, and identify linkages to other sections of the EIS/Application (e.g., wildlife resources and air quality). Interactions between the proposed Project and vegetation and wetland resources are anticipated because of the removal of vegetation during project construction and from air emissions during operations. Site clearing and preparation will remove all vegetation from the footprint, and may affect surrounding vegetation indirectly through changes in abiotic conditions (e.g., soil moisture, or light levels). Air emissions could affect vegetation directly through fumigation (SO2 and NO2) or indirect effect to vegetation resources via fertilization (nitrogen deposition) or by acidification of soils (potential acid input). Effects to vegetation from air emissions could include changes in vegetation health resulting in increased or decreased growth rates or loss of sensitive species.

10.2 Scope of Assessment The vegetation and wetland resources assessment in the EIS/Application will focus on listed plant species at-risk as defined by COSEWIC and the BC Conservation Data Centre; ecological communities at-risk; traditional use plants identified through consultation with interested Aboriginal groups; old forests; and wetlands. Loss of wetland will be described in the context of the Federal Policy on Wetland Conservation.

The EIS/Application will include a description of any legislation, guidelines, best management practices, and guidance documents that are relevant to the protection and management of vegetation on federal lands. The assessment will consider potential effects to vegetation through air emissions at a regional scale, using publicly available datasets and relevant scientific literature. Technical boundaries, which include limitations in scientific information, data analyses, and interpretation, will also be defined through the assessment process.

10.3 Baseline Conditions Baseline conditions will be described as set out in the EIS Guidelines. Baseline conditions of vegetation resources will be determined using a combination of desktop studies using publicly available information, terrestrial ecosystem mapping (TEM), and field surveys. Examples of publicly available information that may be used in the desktop studies include the BC Conservation Data Centre’s Species and Ecosystems Explorer, BC CDC Internet Mapping Service, and the North Coast Terrestrial Ecosystem Mapping project (BC CDC 2013a, 2013b; BC MOFR and BC MOE 2010; Ecora 2013; RIC 1998a).

The TEM for the LAA will be completed according to the Standard for Terrestrial Ecosystem Mapping in British Columbia at 1:1,000 scale (RIC 1998b). Ecosystems will be classified according to the Biogeoclimatic Ecosystem Classification system and A Field Guide to Site Identification and Interpretation for the Prince Rupert Forest Region (Banner et al 1993a and 1993b). Identification and classification of wetland ecosystems will follow the Canadian Wetland Classification System (NWWG 1997) and Wetlands of British Columbia (MacKenzie and Moran 2004).

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 10: Vegetation and Wetland Resources

February 2014


62

Field surveys include:

One set of spring (May) and summer (August) rare plant surveys following Protocols for Rare Plant Surveys (Penny and Klinkenberg 2012)

Terrestrial ecosystem mapping surveys to survey intensity level (SIL) 2 standards, following the methods contained in the Field Manual for Describing Terrestrial Ecosystems— Land Management Handbook 25 (BC MOF and BC MOE 2010).

Data collected during field surveys will be used to verify the TEM, identify ecological communities at risk; describe and classify wetlands; identify stands of old forest; and record abundance and distribution of non-native invasive plant species, traditional use plant species, and plant species at risk.

The EIS/Application will provide the following information for characterizing the baseline conditions for vegetation resources:

Descriptions of ecosystem units identified in the TEM completed for the proposed Project, including wetlands

Descriptions of ecological communities-at-risk identified through TEM and fieldwork

Identification of areas of old forest

A summary of rare plants identified through rare plant surveys and a query of the BC Conservation Data Centre and the SARA public registry

Information on the presence of non-native invasive plant species in the proposed Project area

A summary of species identified by Aboriginal groups as being of importance for cultural, spiritual, or traditional use, including vegetation used as country food, will be incorporated into the social and health assessments.


Analytical methods


Mitigation



Table 14 provides a summary of the potential effects of the proposed Project on vegetation and wetland resources that will be included in the assessment and the measurable parameters that will be used to quantify these effects. Potential project effects on vegetation and wetland resources will be characterized in the context of baseline conditions. Appropriate mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce potential effects from the proposed Project.


Section 10: Vegetation and Wetland Resources


63

Table 14: Potential Effects on Vegetation and Wetland Resources


Change in abundance of plant species of interest

Estimated number of plants from the species of interest affected

Change in abundance or condition of ecological communities of interest

Area of ecological communities of interest affected (measured in hectares)

Change in wetland functions Area of wetland affected (measured in hectares)

10.5 Cumulative Effects An assessment of the proposed Project’s potential contributions to cumulative effects on vegetation and wetland resources will be provided using the methods outlined in Section 4.2.

10.6 Conclusion This section of the EIS/Application will include a brief summary of the predicted residual effects and cumulative effects of the proposed Project on vegetation and wetland resources and a conclusion on the significance of these effects.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 11: Terrestrial Wildlife and Marine Birds

February 2014


64

11 TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE AND MARINE BIRDS

11.1 Introduction The EIS/Application will introduce the terrestrial wildlife and marine birds assessment, describe the rationale for its selection as a VC, and identify linkages to other sections of the EIS/Application (e.g., air quality, acoustic environment, ambient light, and vegetation and wetland resources). Interactions between the proposed Project and wildlife are anticipated because of the disturbance to terrestrial and marine habitats during project development and vessel operations within the shipping channel (between the terminal and Triple Island pilotage station). Site clearing and preparation will remove vegetation from the footprint, and noise from the proposed Project may affect wildlife use of adjacent habitats.

11.2 Scope of Assessment The assessment of potential effects on terrestrial wildlife and marine birds in the EIS/Application will focus on effects from habitat loss or alteration (through vegetation clearing, construction and disturbance), wildlife mortality from project activities, and alteration of movement patterns to avoid project infrastructure and shipping LNG (between the terminal and the Triple Island pilot station). Potential effects of noise from the proposed Project may extend up to 1.5 km from Lelu Island.

The assessment will focus on potential effects of the proposed Project on:

Terrestrial wildlife and marine bird species at risk

Terrestrial wildlife (mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians, invertebrates)

Marine birds

Wildlife habitat features

Wildlife species of importance identified by Aboriginal groups.

The EIS/Application will include a description of legislation, guidelines, best management practices, and guidance documents that are relevant to management of wildlife and their habitats. The assessment will also define technical boundaries that include limitations in available scientific information, data analyses, and interpretation, as defined through the assessment process.

11.3 Baseline Conditions Baseline conditions will be described as set out in the EIS Guidelines. This section of the EIS/Application will provide the following information to characterize baseline conditions for the wildlife VC:

Summary of available existing wildlife inventory and habitat use information for terrestrial and marine habitats in the Prince Rupert area

Assessment of habitat availability for key wildlife species within the LAA derived from habitat suitability modeling based on terrestrial ecosystem mapping (TEM)


Section 11: Terrestrial Wildlife and Marine Birds


65

Summary of important terrestrial wildlife and marine bird habitats and features (e.g., breeding colonies, staging areas, identified raptor nests, and dens)

Summary of the results of 2012 and 2013 field studies, including surveys for terrestrial wildlife, marine birds, diurnal and nocturnal raptors, breeding songbirds, amphibians and incidental observations of wildlife or wildlife signs

BC Conservation Data Centre (BC CDC) element occurrence records

A list of wildlife species identified on federal (COSEWIC and Schedule 1 of SARA) and provincial (red- and blue-listed) lists of species of conservation concern with the potential to occur in the assessment area

A list of wildlife species of cultural, spiritual, or traditional importance to First Nations with potential to occur in the assessment area, where relevant and available

Any other traditional ecological or community knowledge, where relevant and available.


Analytical methods


Mitigation



Table 15 provides a summary of the potential effects of the proposed Project on terrestrial wildlife and marine birds that will be included in the assessment and the measurable parameters that will be used to quantify these effects. Potential project effects on terrestrial wildlife and marine birds will be characterized in context of baseline conditions. Appropriate mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce potential effects from the proposed Project.

Table 15: Potential Effects on Terrestrial Wildlife and Marine Birds


Change in habitat Change in amount of habitat (quantified in hectares) of ecological communities and / or high or moderate suitable habitat identified for Endangered or Threatened SARA-listed species

Change in wildlife mortality risk Qualitative estimate of increased wildlife mortality from the Project

Alteration of wildlife movements Change in movement patterns related to placement of project infrastructure

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 11: Terrestrial Wildlife and Marine Birds

February 2014


66

11.5 Cumulative Effects An assessment of the proposed Project’s potential contributions to cumulative effects on terrestrial wildlife and marine birds will be provided using the methods outlined in Section 4.2.

11.6 Conclusion This section of the EIS/Application will include a brief summary of the predicted residual effects and cumulative effects of the proposed Project on terrestrial wildlife and marine birds and a conclusion on the significance of these effects.


Section 12: Freshwater Aquatic Resources


67

12 FRESHWATER AQUATIC RESOURCES

12.1 Introduction The EIS/Application will introduce the freshwater aquatic resources assessment, describe the rationale for its selection as a VC, and identify linkages to other sections of the EIS/Application. Interactions between the proposed Project and freshwater aquatic resources are anticipated because of the potential effects on watercourses present on Lelu Island. Watercourses in the surrounding area may also be affected by emissions of NOx and SO2 from the Project.

12.2 Scope of Assessment The description of freshwater aquatic resources in the EIS/Application will focus on fish with commercial, recreational, and aboriginal fisheries, or fish that support such a fishery, and species-at-risk. A major emphasis in the assessment will be on effects arising from the alteration, disruption or destruction of freshwater and estuarine fish and fish habitat associated with the construction of the components of the proposed Project on Lelu Island. The EIS/Application will include a description of legislation, guidelines, best management practices, and guidance documents that are relevant to the protection and management of these stocks. Technical boundaries, which include limitations in scientific information, data analyses, and interpretation, will also be defined, if necessary.

12.3 Baseline Conditions Baseline conditions will be described as set out in the EIS Guidelines. The EIS/Application will include baseline studies of the freshwater aquatic habitats potentially affected by the proposed Project and will document the quantity and quality of fish habitat by type and fish species assemblage using these habitats over time and space. The EIS/Application will provide the following information in written form and/or maps characterizing the baseline conditions for freshwater aquatic resources:

Fish species assemblages (by life-stage), relative abundance in accessible anadromous habitat unit types

Physical data, habitat assessment, basic water quality as related to freshwater fish and fish habitat, fish capture and meristic information as described by the Resource Inventory Committee (RIC 2001) for all habitat unit types.


Analytical methods


Mitigation


Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 12: Freshwater Aquatic Resources

February 2014


68


Table 16 provides a summary of the potential effects of the proposed Project on freshwater aquatic resources that will be included in the assessment and the measurable parameters that will be used to quantify these effects. Potential project effects on freshwater aquatic resources will be characterized in context of baseline conditions. Appropriate mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce potential effects from the proposed Project.

Table 16: Potential Effects on Freshwater Aquatic Resources




Increased fish mortality Estimated number of dead and moribund fish that are linked to a commercial, recreational or aboriginal fishery

Change in food and nutrient content Relative contribution of freshwater water output of the watercourses on Lelu Island compared to the output of the Skeena River

12.5 Cumulative Effects An assessment of the proposed Project’s potential contributions to cumulative effects on freshwater aquatic resources will be provided using the methods outlined in Section 4.2.

12.6 Conclusion This section of the EIS/Application will include a brief summary of the predicted residual effects and cumulative effects of the proposed Project on freshwater aquatic resources and a conclusion on the significance of these effects.


Section 13: Marine Resources


69

13 MARINE RESOURCES

13.1 Introduction The EIS/Application will introduce the marine resources assessment, describe the rationale for its selection as a VC, and identify linkages to other sections of the EIS/Application. Interactions between the proposed Project and marine resources are expected because of the in-water construction requirements for the marine terminal (including the trestle and berths), materials offloading facility, bridge from Lelu Island to the mainland, and shipping activities (during construction and operation). These include the potential for increased sedimentation and underwater noise, alteration and/or loss of fish habitat during in-water construction; mortality or physical injury of marine fish during construction; and the potential for effects associated with shipping LNG (between the terminal and Triple Island pilotage station) such as underwater noise.

13.2 Scope of Assessment The marine resources assessment will focus on the planned areas of disturbance or alteration associated with the marine Project components and the effects associated with shipping activities. The EIS/Application will include a description of legislation, guidelines, best management practices, and guidance documents that are relevant to the protection and management of marine resources including: fish with commercial, recreational, and aboriginal fisheries, or fish that support such a fishery; marine mammals; aquatic species-at-risk; and the habitat of these species (including water and sediment quality). Technical boundaries, which include limitations in scientific information, data analyses, and interpretation, will also be defined through the assessment process.

13.3 Baseline Conditions Baseline conditions will be described as set out in the EIS Guidelines. The EIS/Application will characterize baseline conditions for marine resources by providing the following information:

Descriptions of important ecological communities and marine fish habitat identified through fieldwork and literature reviews (e.g., eelgrass beds)

Descriptions of marine fish species (e.g., salmon, eulachon) in relation to the LAA and RAA

Descriptions of marine mammal species present in relation to the LAA and RAA

A summary of federally listed species and species of conservation concern identified through a query of SARA, COSEWIC assessments, and the BC CDC

Publically available baseline data on marine resources in the Prince Rupert area will be summarized in the EIS/application.

Field surveys include:

An intertidal survey around the MOF, marine terminal, and bridge from Lelu Island to the mainland using a transect-based sampling design based on DFO’s guidelines for assessing fish and fish habitat

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 13: Marine Resources

February 2014


70

A subtidal survey around the marine terminal and materials offloading facility using a transect-based sampling design

Sediment core sampling to collect data on sediment size distribution and sediment quality (concentration of contaminants) based on Environment Canada guidelines for disposal at sea.

Water quality sampling to collect data on water chemistry, metals, nutrients, and total suspended solids.


Analytical methods


Mitigation



Table 17 provides a summary of the potential effects of the proposed Project on marine resources that will be included in the assessment and the measurable parameters that will be used to quantify these effects. Potential project effects on marine resources will be characterized in context of baseline conditions. Appropriate mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce potential effects from the proposed Project.

Table 17: Potential Effects on Marine Resources

Potential Adverse Project Effects Measurable Parameters



Increased fish mortality and injury of fish or marine mammals

Probability of injuring or killing marine mammals, or fish that are linked to a commercial, recreational or aboriginal fishery

Change in behaviour of fish or marine mammals due to pressure waves or underwater noise

Timing, duration, and intensity of underwater sound levels

Change in water and sediment quality Estimated change in total suspended solids and concentration of contaminants


Section 13: Marine Resources


71

13.5 Cumulative Effects An assessment of the proposed Project’s potential contributions to cumulative effects on marine resources will be provided using the methods outlined in Section 4.2.

13.6 Conclusion This section of the EIS/Application will include a brief summary of the predicted residual effects and cumulative effects of the proposed Project on marine resources and a conclusion on the significance of these effects.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 14: Economic Environment

February 2014


72

14 ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT

14.1 Introduction This section of the EIS/Application will introduce the assessment of economic effects, describe the rationale for selecting economic conditions as a VC and identify links to other sections of the EIS/Application. Both direct and indirect pressures on the regional economy are expected to occur because of the procurement of goods and services for construction and operation of the proposed Project. This economic environment assessment will only focus on potential adverse economic effects, such as competition for labor and increases in cost of living. Benefits of the proposed Project, including Aboriginal and local employment and procurement opportunities, employment income, and increased government revenue will be presented in Section 29 (Benefits to Canadians).

14.2 Scope of Assessment The assessment of economic effects will focus on the economic contribution of the proposed Project to local and regional economies. The EIS/Application will include a description of policies and best management practices that are relevant to minimizing economic pressures and maximizing benefits of major projects. It will also expand on the rationale for the spatial boundaries identified in tables Table 6 and Table 7. The EIS/Application will also define technical boundaries, if relevant, which include limitations in scientific information, data analyses, and interpretation as defined through the assessment process.

14.3 Baseline Conditions The current characteristics of the economic environment will be described in this section. Information will be obtained from existing literature and other data sources, where available.

This description will summarize:

Current economic conditions, including existing businesses and industry

Key economic indicators and trends in the absence of the proposed Project, based on ready available statistical data (Census Canada, BC Stats), and other published and non-published reports

Labour market, including employment/unemployment, current employers, available labour supply and level of education/skills/training of the labour force, based on data (Census Canada, BC Stats, and Service Canada), as well as primary information sources

Supply of goods and services in the region based on local government, chamber of commerce, and other published and non-published data, as well as primary information sources.

Information will be disaggregated (e.g., by sub-population, geographic area, and/or communities), where practicable.


Section 14: Economic Environment


73


Analytical methods


Mitigation



Table 18 provides a summary of the potential effects of the proposed Project on the economic environment that will be included in the assessment and the measurable parameters that will be used to quantify these effects. Potential project effects on the economic environment will be characterized in context of baseline conditions. The distribution of the potential effects will be discussed. Appropriate mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce potential effects from the proposed Project.

Table 18: Potential Effects on the Economic Environment


Change in labour supply/demand within the LAA Labour availability (persons)

Skill levels

Adverse changes to economic activity Change in economic activity of other sectors

Adverse changes to municipal finances Municipal revenue

Cost of services

14.5 Cumulative Effects An assessment of the proposed Project’s potential contributions to cumulative effects on the economic environment will be provided using the methods outlined in Section 4.2.

14.6 Conclusion This section of the EIS/Application will include a brief summary of the predicted residual effects and cumulative effects of the proposed Project on the economic environment and a conclusion on the significance of these effects.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 15: Navigation and Marine Resource Use

February 2014


74

15 NAVIGATION AND MARINE RESOURCE USE

15.1 Introduction This section of the EIS/Application will describe the rationale for selecting navigation and marine resource as a VC and identify linkages to other sections of the EIS/Application (e.g., marine resources). Interactions between the proposed Project, navigation and marine resource use are expected because marine project components (i.e., the marine terminal, and bridge from Lelu Island to the mainland) would interfere with local navigation. Also, up to one LNG carrier per day will visit the marine terminal at full build-out. The marine project infrastructure and movement of LNG carriers have the potential to interact with other marine users.

15.2 Scope of Assessment The assessment of effects on navigation and marine resource use will focus on potential effects arising from interactions between marine project components and users of navigable waters in the vicinity of Lelu Island, shipping activities related to construction, and potential shipping routes of LNG carriers (between the marine terminal and Triple Island). The assessment will include both direct and indirect effects on navigation. The EIS/Application will expand on the rationale for the spatial boundaries identified in tables Table 6 and Table 7. Technical boundaries, which include limitations in scientific information, data analyses, and interpretation, will also be defined through the assessment process.

15.3 Baseline Conditions Baseline conditions will be described as set out in the EIS Guidelines. This section of the EIS/Application will describe the approach and methods used to collect baseline marine traffic and resource use information required to support the assessment, and will identify the sources of this information. Baseline conditions will be characterized from primary and secondary data including:

Information from the PRPA

Current status of navigation aids, Coast guard responses, and communications

Shipping, commercial, and non-commercial use within the LAA and RAA

Geo-spatial and attribute information on shipping and marine transportation and resource use

Interviews with relevant stakeholders

Commercial, recreational, subsistence, and First Nations fisheries

Observational data on marine users within the vicinity of Lelu Island.


Analytical methods


Section 15: Navigation and Marine Resource Use


75


Mitigation



Table 19 provides a summary of the potential effects of the proposed Project on navigation and marine resource use that will be included in the assessment and the measurable parameters that will be used to quantify these effects. Potential project effects on navigation and marine resource use will be characterized in context of baseline conditions. Appropriate mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce potential effects from the proposed Project.

Table 19: Potential Effects on Navigation and Marine Resource Use


Interference with navigation Magnitude and duration of effect on navigation

Effects on fishing, recreation and marine use (including marine tourism)

Change in number and types of marine vessels as a result of the proposed Project (vessels/month)

Attribute data on marine uses along shipping channel (i.e., fishing, aquaculture)

Recreational activities/destinations overlapping with project infrastructure and project shipping channels (between the terminal and Triple Island pilotage station)

15.5 Cumulative Effects An assessment of the proposed Project’s potential contributions to cumulative effects on navigation and marine resource use will be provided using the methods outlined in Section 4.2.

15.6 Conclusion This section of the EIS/Application will include a brief summary of the predicted residual effects and cumulative effects of the proposed Project on navigation and marine resource use and a conclusion on the significance of these effects.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 16: Infrastructure and Services

February 2014


76

16 INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES

16.1 Introduction This section of the EIS/Application will introduce the assessment of effects on infrastructure and services, describe the rationale for its selection as a VC, and identify linkages to other sections of the EIS/Application. Interactions between the proposed Project and infrastructure and services are expected as a result of the influx of temporary workers required during construction and permanent workers during operations.

16.2 Scope of Assessment The assessment of effects on infrastructure and services will focus on issues related to pressures on accommodations, transportation, utilities, communications, education, emergency, social, recreational services and infrastructure. The emphasis of the assessment will be on effects on Port Edward and Prince Rupert during construction and operations. The EIS/Application will include a description of legislation, guidelines, best management practices, and guidance documents that are relevant to minimizing negative effects on infrastructure and services. It will also expand on the rationale for the spatial boundaries identified in tables Table 6 and Table 7.


This section of the EIS/Application will describe the approach and methods used to collect baseline social information (e.g., demographic data, housing information) required to support the assessment, and will identify the sources of this information. Baseline data collection focuses on the development of information needed to describe current and anticipated social conditions. This information will help establish the “backdrop” of local and regional conditions against which the effects of the proposed Project will be assessed and benchmarks for identifying and evaluating incremental effects. The baseline data will describe both prevailing conditions, and trends affecting these conditions. It will characterize baseline conditions, and will include information relating to:

Official community plans

Regional governance

Housing and accommodations

Community services

Emergency services

Sewage and water treatment facilities

Garbage collection & disposal and recycling facilities

Transportation infrastructure

Energy and utilities

Communications infrastructure

Recreational resources.


Section 16: Infrastructure and Services


77

Infrastructure and services will be described using statistical information, published reports, academic literature and other qualitative data sources, where appropriate. Key informant interviews with representatives from appropriate government departments/agencies (municipal and provincial) and other organizations will be completed as required.


Analytical methods


Mitigation



Table 20 provides a summary of the potential effects of the proposed Project on infrastructure and services that will be included in the assessment and the measurable parameters that will be used to quantify these effects. Potential project effects on the infrastructure and services will be characterized in context of baseline conditions. Appropriate mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce potential effects from the proposed Project. The effects assessment will reference PETRONAS standards and relevant corporate experience developing LNG facilities in other jurisdictions worldwide.

Table 20: Potential Effects on Infrastructure and Services


Effects on community services and infrastructure

Number of workers and their dependents for each phase

Change in demographic composition

Demand and supply of community infrastructure and services (e.g., education, social services, etc.)

Parameters based on infrastructure and services affected (e.g., police officers/1,000 people)

Effects on traffic and pressure on transportation infrastructure

Daily traffic volume (vehicle/day)

Air traffic

Traffic incidents in Port Edward and Prince Rupert

Change in housing availability and affordability

Housing supply and demand (units)

Housing cost

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 16: Infrastructure and Services

February 2014


78

16.5 Cumulative Effects An assessment of the proposed Project’s potential contributions to cumulative effects on infrastructure and services will be provided using the methods outlined in Section 4.2.

16.6 Conclusion This section of the EIS/Application will include a brief summary of the predicted residual effects and cumulative effects of the proposed Project on infrastructure and services and a conclusion on the significance of these effects.


Section 17: Visual Quality


79

17 VISUAL QUALITY

17.1 Introduction This section of the EIS/Application will introduce the assessment of effects on visual quality describe the rationale for its selection as a VC, and identify linkages to other sections of the EIS/Application. Interactions between the proposed Project and visual quality are expected as the proposed Project (including shipping LNG between the terminal and Triple Island pilotage station) may be visible from viewpoints within Port Edward and local recreational areas within the vicinity of Lelu Island.

17.2 Scope of Assessment As the proposed Project is anticipated to alter the viewscape from Port Edward and from the water (including locations of potential importance to Aboriginal people), the EIS/Application will consider changes in the visual quality relative to baseline conditions, in consideration of visual quality objectives, and identified important viewpoints. The EIS/Application will also expand on the rationale for the spatial boundaries identified in Table 6 and Table 7. Technical boundaries, which include limitations in scientific information, data analyses, and interpretation, will also be defined through the assessment process.

17.3 Baseline Conditions This section of the EIS/Application will describe the approach and methods used to collect baseline information required to support the assessment, and will identify the sources of this information. Baseline information related to visual quality will be obtained from the following sources:

Viewshed analysis of proposed Project facilities to identify area of potential visibility

Information interviews to identify potential sensitive viewpoints, including residences and recreation sites

Photographic and attribute information from field observations at selected viewpoints.


Analytical methods


Mitigation



Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 17: Visual Quality

February 2014


80

Table 21 provides a summary of the potential effects of the proposed Project on visual quality that will be included in the assessment and the measurable parameters that will be used to quantify these effects. Potential project effects on visual quality will be characterized in context of baseline conditions. Appropriate mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce potential effects from the proposed Project.

Table 21: Potential Effects on Visual Quality


Change in visual quality Change in existing visual condition

Change in visual quality objective class

Change in landscape attributes contributing to visual sensitivity.

17.5 Cumulative Effects An assessment of the proposed Project’s potential contributions to cumulative effects on visual quality will be provided using the methods outlined in Section 4.2.

17.6 Conclusion This section of the EIS/Application will include a brief summary of the predicted residual effects and cumulative effects of the proposed Project on visual quality and a conclusion on the significance of these effects.


Section 18: Community Health and Well-Being


81

18 COMMUNITY HEALTH AND WELL-BEING

18.1 Introduction The EIS/Application will introduce the assessment of community health and well-being, describe the rationale for its selection as a VC, and identify linkages to other sections of the EIS/Application (e.g., infrastructure and services). Interactions between the proposed Project and community health are anticipated because of the influx in temporary workers required during construction, and the potential for adverse effects on community health indicators and health outcomes.

18.2 Scope of Assessment The community health and well-being assessment will focus on potential project effects on community health factors in local communities within the LAA. The EIS/Application will include a description of any legislation, guidelines, best management practices, and guidance documents that are relevant to minimizing effects on community health. It will also expand on the rationale for the spatial boundaries identified in Table 6 and Table 7. Technical boundaries, which include limitations in scientific information, data analyses, and interpretation, will also be through the assessment process.

18.3 Baseline Conditions This section of the EIS/Application will describe the approach and methods used to collect baseline data required to support the assessment, and will identify the sources of this information. Baseline data collection focuses on the development of information needed to describe current and anticipated community health conditions. This information will help establish the “backdrop” of local and regional conditions against which the effects of the proposed Project will be assessed and benchmarks for identifying and evaluating incremental effects. The baseline review will consider both prevailing conditions, as well as trends. Baseline information is derived from academic literature, published and unpublished reports (i.e., government, industry, community), Statistics Canada data, and key informant interviews (i.e., hospital administrators). It will characterize baseline conditions, and will include information relating to:

Local health services and infrastructure

Community health determinants/indicators

Community cohesion and resilience determinants/indicators

Health data such as birth and death rates, disease incidence, accident rates.

Community health conditions will be described using existing and publicly available literature and other data sources, where appropriate. Discussions with representatives from appropriate government departments/agencies (municipal and provincial) and other organizations (e.g., Aboriginal groups and community organizations) will be completed as required. Information will be disaggregated (e.g., by sub-population, geographic area, and/or communities), where practicable.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 18: Community Health and Well-Being

February 2014


82


Analytical methods


Mitigation



Table 22 provides a summary of the potential effects of the proposed Project on community health and well-being that will be included in the assessment and the measurable parameters that will be used to quantify these effects. Potential project effects on the community health and well-being will be characterized in context of baseline conditions. The distribution of the potential effects will be discussed. Appropriate mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce potential effects from the proposed Project.

Table 22: Potential Effects on Community Health and Well-Being


Change to social determinants of health Population (demographics, rate of change)

Education, employment and income

Housing

Community cohesion

Physical and mental health conditions (e.g., drug and alcohol use, divorce rates, increased gambling, etc.)

Supply and demand of health infrastructure and services

Demand associated with physical health

Demand associated with mental health

Demand associated with health and safety site inspections

Recreation opportunities

Change in diet and nutrition Change in the composition of diets (proportion of country foods to market foods)

18.5 Cumulative Effects An assessment of the proposed Project’s potential contributions to cumulative effects on community health and well-being will be provided using the methods outlined in Section 4.2.

18.6 Conclusion This section of the EIS/Application will include a brief summary of the predicted residual effects and cumulative effects of the proposed Project on community health and well-being and a conclusion on the significance of these effects.


Section 19: Human and Ecological Health


83

19 HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL HEALTH

19.1 Introduction The EIS/Application will introduce the human and ecological health assessment and describe the rationale for its inclusion as a VC. The proposed Project may interact with human or ecological health through a number of pathways:

Potential degradation of ambient air quality may result in health risks to people or wildlife

Increased noise and ambient light levels could affect the health of local people

Suspension of historic organic and metal contaminants in sediment during dredging may affect marine biota through direct uptake or through food chain effects, and may also affect humans consuming country foods.

Potential effects on worker health will not be considered in the EIS/Application as this is regulated under applicable federal and/or provincial occupational health and safety legislation and regulations.

19.2 Scope of Assessment The human and ecological health assessment in the EIS/Application will focus on issues associated with sensitive human receptors and with ecological receptors (i.e., plants, invertebrates, wildlife). These potentially occur through activities or emissions in the construction, operation and decommissioning phases of the proposed Project. The human health risk assessment will evaluate the potential effects arising from exposure to airborne CACs (i.e., SO2, NO2, PM2.5, PM10, CO, and H2S.), light and acoustic emissions from the facility, terminal, and shipping traffic (between the terminal and Triple Island pilotage station). Human and ecological health concerns associated with the potential exposure of marine biota (including those consumed as country foods) to historic contaminants that may be redistributed during dredging will also be addressed. The ecological health risk assessment will evaluate the potential for health risks to ecological receptors as a result of predicted changes to air quality or potential chemical changes to the marine environment related to construction and dredging activity in the marine environment.

The EIS/Application will include a description of legislation, guidelines, best management practices, and guidance documents that are relevant to minimizing effects on human and ecological health. It will also expand on the rationale for the spatial boundaries identified in tables Table 6 and Table 7. Technical boundaries, which include limitations in scientific information, data analyses, and interpretation, will also be defined through the assessment process.

19.3 Baseline Conditions Baseline conditions will be described as set out in the EIS Guidelines. The baseline conditions for measurable parameters relevant to air, noise, and aquatic effects to human and ecological health will be described in this section. Baseline conditions related to air quality, marine water quality, and sediment quality will be presented. Information will be obtained from literature, existing data sources, and noise and air baseline reports. To minimize duplication of information, references will be made to relevant sections of the air quality, ambient light, acoustic environment, and marine resources VCs where appropriate. As necessary, communications or interviews with representatives from the BC MOE and Ministry of Health will be carried out to fill data gaps.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 19: Human and Ecological Health

February 2014


84


Analytical methods


Mitigation



Table 23 provides a summary of the potential effects of the proposed Project on human and ecological health that will be included in the assessment and the measurable parameters that will be used to quantify these effects. Potential project effects on human and ecological health will be characterized in context of baseline conditions. Appropriate mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce potential effects from the proposed Project.

Table 23: Potential Effects on Human and Ecological Health


Change in human health Concentration ratio (non-cancer health risks from inhalation or drinking water exposure)

Hazard Quotient (non-cancer health risks from food/dermal exposure)

Incremental Lifetime Cancer Risk (cancer risks from long-term exposure via inhalation or oral/dermal exposure)

Change in ecological health Risk Quotient (health risks to populations from long-term exposure via oral/dermal pathways; or health risks to community based on concentration in exposure medium)

19.5 Cumulative Effects An assessment of the proposed Project’s potential contributions to cumulative effects on human and ecological health will be provided using the methods outlined in Section 4.2.

19.6 Conclusion This section of the EIS/Application will include a brief summary of the predicted residual effects and cumulative effects of the proposed Project on human and ecological health and a conclusion on the significance of these effects.


Section 20: Archaeological and Heritage Resources


85

20 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HERITAGE RESOURCES

20.1 Introduction The EIS/Application will introduce the archaeological and heritage assessment, describe the rationale for its selection as a VC, and identify linkages to other sections of the EIS/Application (e.g., Current Use of Lands and Resources for Traditional Purposes). Interactions between the proposed Project and archaeological and heritage resources are anticipated because of the location of the LNG facility on Lelu Island. Interactions between the proposed Project and archaeological and heritage resources, if encountered, are likely to occur from site preparation activities during project construction. In particular, the clearing of vegetation and any ground disturbing activities, have the potential to disturb archaeological and heritage resources.

20.2 Scope of Assessment The archaeological and heritage resources assessment in the EIS/Application will focus on resources including objects and sites identified through the proposed Project Archaeological Impact Assessment (AIA) and through engagement with interested First Nations. The emphasis of the assessment will be on effects arising from the alteration or destruction of resources during construction of the LNG facility on Lelu Island. The EIS/Application will include a description of legislation, guidelines, best management practices, and guidance documents that are relevant to the protection and management of these archaeological resources. It will also expand on the rationale for the spatial boundaries identified in Table 6 and Table 7. Technical boundaries, which include limitations in scientific information, data analyses, and interpretation, will also be identified through the assessment process.

20.3 Baseline Conditions The EIS/Application will provide the following information to characterize the baseline conditions for archaeological and heritage resources:

Information on the location and nature of previously recorded archaeological sites in the proposed project development area and in the RAA will be obtained through desktop review

Detailed AIA field work on Lelu Island and on the mainland in the vicinity of the proposed bridge to Lelu Island

Field work on Lelu Island (federal land) will be completed in accordance with BC Association of Professional Archaeologists (APA) professional standards and guidelines of PRPA following federal heritage policies

The AIA on the mainland would be conducted in accordance with the British Columbia Archaeological Impact Assessment Guidelines, and under a Heritage Inspection Permit issued by the BC Archaeology Branch pursuant to Section 14 of the Heritage Conservation Act.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 20: Archaeological and Heritage Resources

February 2014


86


Analytical methods


Mitigation



Table 24 provides a summary of the potential effects of the proposed Project on archaeological and heritage resources that will be included in the assessment and the measurable parameters that will be used to quantify these effects. Potential project effects on archaeological and heritage resources will be characterized in context of baseline conditions. Appropriate mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce potential effects from the proposed Project.

Table 24: Potential Effects on Heritage and Archaeological Resources


Alteration or destruction of heritage sites Number damaged or destroyed

Alteration or destruction of archaeological sites Number damaged or destroyed

Alteration or destruction of culturally modified trees (CMTs) Number damaged or destroyed

20.5 Cumulative Effects An assessment of the proposed Project’s potential contributions to cumulative effects on archaeological and heritage resources will be provided using the methods outlined in Section 4.2.

20.6 Conclusion This section of the EIS/Application will include a brief summary of the predicted residual effects and cumulative effects of the proposed Project on archaeological and heritage resources and a conclusion on the significance of these effects.


Section 21: Current Use of Lands and Resources for Traditional Purposes


87

21 CURRENT USE OF LANDS AND RESOURCES FOR TRADITIONAL PURPOSES

21.1 Introduction The EIS/Application will introduce the current use of lands and resources by Aboriginal people, describe the rationale for its selection as a VC, and identify linkages to other sections of the EIS/Application. Interactions between the proposed Project and current use of lands and resources for traditional purposes by Aboriginal people are anticipated because of the potential effects of the proposed Project on use of Lelu Island and the adjacent marine areas.

21.2 Scope of Assessment The current use of lands and resources for traditional purposes by Aboriginal people assessment in the EIS/Application will focus on potential effects on access to Lelu Island and the adjacent marine areas. The EIS/Application will also expand on the rationale for the spatial boundaries identified in Table 6 and Table 7.

21.3 Baseline Conditions The EIS/Application will describe the current use of lands and resources for traditional purposes by Aboriginal people as set out in the EIS Guidelines. This will focus on marine resource use of the area for fishing, shellfish harvesting, and gathering seaweed. Hunting, trapping, and other traditional uses of the land in the area will also be discussed. Information will be used from publicly available sources and from traditional use studies, if made available.

21.4 Effects Assessment The effects assessment will be carried out according to the methods set out in Section 4.1.4 and in a manner that is consistent with and satisfies the objectives of the effects assessment methodology requirements set out in the EIS Guidelines. This will include:

Analytical methods


Mitigation



Table 25 provides a summary of the potential effects of the proposed Project on current use of lands and resources by Aboriginal people that will be included in the assessment and the measurable parameters that will be used to quantify these effects. Potential project effects on current use of lands and resources by Aboriginal people will be characterized in context of baseline conditions. Appropriate mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce potential effects from the proposed Project.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 21: Current Use of Lands and Resources for Traditional Purposes

February 2014


88

Table 25: Potential Effects on Current Use of Lands and Resources for Traditional Purposes


Changes to current use of lands and resources for traditional purposes by Aboriginal people

Quantitative changes in preferred harvested species

Changes in, or restrictions on, preferred identified harvesting methods

Quantity and quality of identified valued traditional use locations and access corridors where use or access to those locations is changed

Quantity of affected identified and valued culturally important natural landforms and natural features

Quantity, quality, and accessibility of similar alternate locations where traditional use of the land and resources remains unaffected by the proposed Project

Qualitative changes in the experience of using the land and resources for traditional purposes

21.5 Cumulative Effects An assessment of the proposed Project’s potential contributions to cumulative effects on current use of lands and resources by Aboriginal people will be provided using the methods outlined in Section 4.2.

21.6 Conclusion This section of the EIS/Application will include a brief summary of the predicted residual effects and cumulative effects of the proposed Project on current use of lands and resources by Aboriginal people and a conclusion on the significance of these effects.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 22: Accidents or Malfunctions


89

22 ACCIDENTS OR MALFUNCTIONS The assessment of effects of potential accidents or malfunctions will be completed as set out by the EIS Guidelines. The assessment will include an explanation of how those events were identified, and potential consequences (including potential environmental effects). For this assessment, an “accident” is defined as an unexpected occurrence or unintended action that can result in an adverse environmental or human health effect and a “malfunction” is defined as the failure of a piece of equipment, a device, or a system to function normally that can result in an adverse environmental or human health effect.

The specific accidents or malfunctions to be considered include:

Emergency flaring and emergency LNG facility shutdown

Explosion or fire

Fuel or hazardous material spill (at the storage or loading facilities (from mobile equipment and storage vessels)

LNG spill (release at the storage or loading facilities)

Marine vessel allision (vessel striking another fixed vessel or object), grounding or collision (two moving vessels), including:

Marine vessel allision with the LNG terminal or grounding

Marine vessel collision with another vessel

Marine vessel collision with a marine mammal.

For each event, the assessment will include:

A description of the event.

The methodology for assessing the potential risk of each event

Descriptions of consequences

Descriptions of likelihood of the scenario occurring

The identification of proposed measures to reduce the likelihood of the event

The assessment of effects and/or consequences that may result from such events

The identification of measures to mitigate the effects/consequences

The conclusions on the potential risk of the accident or malfunction.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 23: Effects of the Environment on the Project

February 2014


90

23 EFFECTS OF THE ENVIRONMENT ON THE PROJECT

The assessment of effects of the environment on the proposed Project will be completed as set out by the EIS Guidelines. The environmental assessment will consider the changes to the proposed Project resulting from the following natural events:

Extreme storm conditions (a 1 in 100 year storm event)

1 in 2,475 year seismic event

Tsunami

Forecasted sea level rise resulting from climate change. Where relevant and possible, the implications of such climate induced changes to the extreme weather events given above will also be assessed.

For each of the above environmental factors, the EIS/Application will identify:

The methodology for assessing the potential risk of an event

Descriptions of consequences

Descriptions of likelihood of the hazard occurring

The assessment of effects and/or consequences that may result from such hazard

The identification of measures to mitigate the effects/consequences

The conclusions on the potential risk of the effects of the environment to the proposed Project.


Section 24: Summary of Proposed Environmental and Operational Management Plans


91

24 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL AND OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT PLANS

The EIS/Application will provide a list of the environmental management and operational plans for construction and operation of the proposed Project.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 25: Changes to the Environment

February 2014


92

25 CHANGES TO THE ENVIRONMENT The changes to the environment from the proposed Project will be described as set out in the EIS Guidelines. The EIS/Application will include sections that summarize the following changes to the environment from the proposed Project:

Changes to components of the environment within federal jurisdiction

Changes to the environment that would occur on federal or transboundary lands

Changes to the environment that are directly linked or necessarily incidental to federal decisions.


Section 26: Effects of Changes to the Environment


93

26 EFFECTS OF CHANGES TO THE ENVIRONMENT The effects of changes to the environment from the proposed Project will be described as set out in the EIS Guidelines. The EIS/Application will include sections that describe:

Effects of changes to the environment with respect to Aboriginal peoples, on:

Health and socio-economic conditions

Physical and cultural heritage

Current use of lands and resources for traditional purposes

Any structure, site or thing that is of historical, archaeological, paleontological or architectural significance.

Effects of changes to the environment that are directly linked or necessarily incidental to federal decisions, including:

Health and socio-economic conditions

Physical and cultural heritage

Any structure, site or thing that is of historical archaeological, paleontological or architectural significance.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 27: Aboriginal Rights and Related Interests

February 2014


94

27 ABORIGINAL RIGHTS AND RELATED INTERESTS

27.1 Aboriginal Rights For the purposes of the EIS/Application, the term “Aboriginal Rights” means the same as “Aboriginal Interests” as defined in the BC EAO section 11 Order.

The discussion of potential effects on Aboriginal Rights from the proposed Project will be provided as set out in the EIS Guidelines. This section of the EIS/Application will also incorporate findings of the VC chapters in the EIS/Application that are relevant to Aboriginal Rights, including proposed mitigation measures. This section applies to Aboriginal groups listed in Schedule B of the section 11 Order.

The Aboriginal groups discussed in this section will include:

Metlakatla First Nation

Lax Kw’alaams First Nation

Gitxaala Nation

Kitselas First Nation

Kitsumkalum First Nation.

For each Aboriginal group this section will include:

A description of the Aboriginal rights of each group identified through secondary research techniques or provided directly through consultation activities. This will include background information on ethnography, language, governance, and reserves.

TEK and TLU information, as available

A summary of consultation activities

A description of potential adverse effects of the proposed Project on Aboriginal Rights

A description of measures to avoid or reduce potential adverse effects on Aboriginal Rights

A characterization of the residual adverse effects on Aboriginal Rights after mitigation. A determination of the significance of residual adverse effects on Aboriginal Rights will not be provided.

A description of cumulative effects related to the proposed Project assessed in the VC chapters in the EIS/Application that are relevant to Aboriginal rights.

A summary of any outstanding Aboriginal right issues identified by Aboriginal groups.

27.2 Other Matters of Concern to Aboriginal People Other matters of concern to Aboriginal People (and their related interests) will be discussed as set out in the EIS Guidelines.


Section 27: Aboriginal Rights and Related Interests


95

This section will include:

An identification of other matters of concern to Aboriginal people with respect to potential social, economic, environmental, heritage and health effects of the proposed project (to the extent not already identified in Section 27.1 above or in Section 21, Current Use of Lands and Resources for Traditional Purposes)

A description of measures to address potential effects on other matters of concern to Aboriginal people

Characterization of the potential effects after mitigation

A description of how these matters of concern have been addressed from the perspective of PNW LNG.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 28: Summary of the Assessment

February 2014


96

28 SUMMARY OF THE ASSESSMENT The EIS/Application will provide a summary of the assessment as set out in the EIS Guidelines. This will include a series of tables that summarize the following information:

Potential effects on the environment, adverse impacts on potential Aboriginal rights and related interests, and public concerns

Mitigation measures and commitments

Residual and cumulative effects

Significant adverse environmental effects

Comments from the public

Comments from Aboriginal groups

Relationship of VCs to Aboriginal groups rights and related interests.

Examples of the format of key tables are provided below.

Table 26: Summary of Potential Effects on Aboriginal Rights and Related Interests and Measures to Address Effects

Potential Effects of the Project Measures to Address Effects

Table 27: Summary of Project Residual and Cumulative Effects

Potential Effect Project Phase Contributing

Project Activity or Physical Works

Proposed Mitigation/

Compensation Significance

Valued Component

Table 28: Summary of Mitigation Measures and Commitments

Number Proposed Commitment (Mitigation Measure) Timing


Section 29: Benefits to Canadians


97

29 BENEFITS TO CANADIANS The EIS/Application will provide information on the benefits to Canadians as set out in the EIS Guidelines. This will include a description of:

Changes to the proposed Project since initially proposed

Benefits of the proposed Project.


Initial capital construction cost estimates including:

Costs for the land, buildings, and equipment associated with the proposed Project

Indication of the potential for use of local facilities and indication if these are currently under-utilized.

Estimated operating costs over the life of the proposed Project (for land, buildings and equipment) including:

Estimated annual operating costs (excluding labour)

Indication of how the costs are measured (i.e., current dollar value or Net Present Value)

Anticipated costs for decommissioning/closure/abandonment/reclamation.

Employment estimates including:

Direct employment, stated in number of person years, to be created by major job category (e.g., labour, management, business services) during construction and operation, distinguishing among full-time, part-time and seasonal workers

Wage levels, by major job category, for the construction and operating periods

Breakdown of the number of people that will be hired locally, provincially, nationally or internationally for the proposed Project

Potential for PNW LNG to use local human resources that are currently under-utilized

Relevant employment policies/practices

Indirect employment for the construction and operation phases of the proposed Project including any assumptions relating to industry specific multipliers or other multipliers used.

After determining the proposed Project’s staffing needs, PNW LNG will engage with Aboriginal groups, the public and stakeholders to determine their interest and potential for meeting staffing requirements. PNW LNG will potentially support training to assist individuals in meeting the requirements for employment or for providing contractor services. The EIS/Application will provide information on these efforts. The EIS/Application will also provide:

Contractor supply services estimates including:

List of the major types of businesses/contractors, broken down at the local, provincial, and national level that would benefit from the proposed Project

Value of supply of service contracts expected for both the construction and operation phases of the proposed Project

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 29: Benefits to Canadians

February 2014


98

Information about PNW LNG’s local purchasing strategy, if any.

Annual government revenues for the construction and operation phases of the proposed Project including:

Local/municipal (property taxes, other)

Regional District (taxes, other)

Provincial (income tax, sales tax, lease, license and tenure, royalties, other)

Federal (income tax, Goods and Services Tax (GST), payroll taxes, other).

Anticipated overall contribution to British Columbia’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP)

Assumptions and reference information sources for the above information

Identification of proposed Project’s contributions to community development.


Section 30: Follow-up Program and Compliance Reporting


99

30 FOLLOW-UP PROGRAM AND COMPLIANCE REPORTING

A follow-up program is designed to verify the accuracy of the effects assessment and to determine the effectiveness of the measures implemented to mitigate the adverse effects of the proposed Project. The EIS/Application will describe the proposed follow-up program in sufficient detail to reliably verify predicted effects (or absence of them), and to confirm both the assumptions and the effectiveness of mitigation.

The EIS/Application will provide a clear description of the reporting structure as identified within the EMPs, monitoring plans and commitments, including monitoring required for all permits, authorizations and licenses.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 31: Conclusion

February 2014


100

31 CONCLUSION The EIS/Application will:

Provide a summary of PNW LNG’s understanding of the BC environmental assessment process in promoting sustainable development while minimizing effect to environmental, economic, social, heritage and health values.

Provide a description of how the proposed Project aligns with the goal of the BC environmental assessment process.

Provide a statement on the overall significance of the proposed Project’s effects on the biophysical and human environment and its ability to mitigate them.

Request an environmental assessment certificate from the Government of British Columbia and a decision under section 52 of CEAA 2012 from the Canadian Minister of the Environment.

Confirm the need to successfully complete subsequent permitting/authorization processes prior to proceeding with the proposed Project construction, operation, and decommissioning.


Section 32: References


101

32 REFERENCES The EIS/Application will list the references used in preparing the EIS/Application. The references used to prepare this AIR are provided below.

Banner, A., W. MacKenzie, S. Haeussler, S. Thomson, J. Pojar and R. Trowbridge. 1993a. A Field Guide to Site Identification and Interpretation for the Prince Rupert Forest Region. Land Management Handbook No.26. Part 1. Ministry of Forests, Research Program.

Banner, A., W. MacKenzie, S. Haeussler, S. Thomson, J. Pojar and R. Trowbridge. 1993b. A Field Guide to Site Identification and Interpretation for the Prince Rupert Forest Region. Land Management Handbook No.26. Part 2. Ministry of Forests, Research Program.

BC Conservation Data Centre (BC CDC) 2013a. BC Species and Ecosystems Explorer. BC Ministry of Environment, Victoria, BC. Available at: http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/eswp/.

BC Conservation Data Centre (BC CDC) 2013b. CDC Internet Mapping Service. BC Ministry of Environment, Victoria, BC. Available at http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/atrisk/ims.htm.

BC Environmental Assessment Office (BC EAO). 2013. Guideline for the Selection of Valued Components and Assessment of Potential Effects. 26 July, 2013. Available at: http://www.eao.gov.bc.ca/pdf/EAO_Valued_Components_Guideline_2013_07_30.pdf.

BC Ministry of Environment (BC MOE). 2008. Guidelines for Air Quality Dispersion Modelling in British Columbia. Environmental Protection Division, Environmental Quality Branch, Air Protection Section. Victoria, BC. March 2008. Available at: http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/epd/bcairquality/reports/pdfs/air_disp_model_08.pdf.

BC Ministry of Forests (BC MOF). 1998. Extension Note 21 –Biodiversity and Interior Habitats: The Need to Minimize Edge Effects. Available at: http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/pubs/docs/en/en21.pdf.

BC Ministry of Forests and Range and BC Ministry of Environment (BC MOFR and BC MOE). 2010. Field Manual for Describing Terrestrial Ecosystems— Land Management Handbook 25. 2nd Ed.

BC Oil and Gas Commission (BC OGC). 2009. British Columbia Noise Control Best Practices Guideline. March 2009. Available at: http://www.bcogc.ca/node/8152/download.

Ecora Resource Group Ltd, (Ecora). 2013. North Coast Level R Terrestrial Ecosystem Mapping. Project Final Report. Prepared for BC Ministry of Environment, Contract #; OT13ESD-070, Service Request WO#; WO13ESD-024. 24pp.

Health Canada. 2010. Useful Information for Environmental Assessments. Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.

MacKenzie, W. and J. Moran. 2004. Wetlands of British Columbia: A Guide to Identification. Handbook. No. 52. Resource Branch, British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Victoria, BC.

Pacific NorthWest LNG Application Information Requirements Section 32: References

February 2014


102

National Wetlands Working Group (NWWG). 1997. Canadian Wetland Classification System. Edited by: Warner, B.G. and C.D.A. Rubec. 2nd Ed. Available at: http://www.gret-perg.ulaval.ca/fileadmin/fichiers/fichiersGRET/pdf/Doc_generale/Wetlands.pdf.

Penny, Jennifer and Rose Klinkenberg. 2012. Protocols for Rare Plant Surveys. BC Conservation Data Centre and E-Flora BC. Available at: http://www.geog.ubc.ca/biodiversity/eflora/ProtocolsforRarePlantSurveys.html.

Resource Inventory Committee (RIC). 1998b. Standard for Terrestrial Ecosystem Mapping in British Columbia. Ecosystems Working Group. Victoria, BC.

Resource Inventory Committee (RIC). 2001. Reconnaissance (1:20 000) Fish and Fish Habitat Inventory: Standards and Procedures, version 2. BC Fisheries Information Services Branch. Victoria, BC.

Resources Inventory Committee (RIC). 1998a. Standards for Broad Terrestrial Ecosystem Classification and Mapping for British Columbia: Classification and Correlation of the Broad Habitat Classes used in 1:250,000 Ecological Mapping. Version 2.0. Ecosystems Working Group. Victoria. BC.

Resources Inventory Committee (RIC). 1998b. Standard for Terrestrial Ecosystem Mapping in British Columbia. Ecosystems Working Group, Terrestrial Ecosystems Task Force. May 1998. Available at: http://www.ilmb.gov.bc.ca/risc/pubs/teecolo/tem/tem_man.pdf.

Trites, R.W. 1952. The Oceanography of Chatham Sound, British Columbia. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Masters of Arts. Department of Physics. The University of British Columbia.


Section 33: Appendices


103

33 APPENDICES This section will include the appendices referenced in the EIS/Application.

Information prepared by professionals and provided under their professional seal will be identified in the EIS/Application and the related sealed studies will be included in an Appendix.

pacific northwest lng application information requirements on

Documents