outline of reportintersection ④: numerous westside right-turn vehicles on both days: temporary...

Survey Project Regarding Influences and Effects on Traffic Flowfor Verification Test in Tokyo Waterfront Area in 2020,

Shown in

Automated Driving (Practical Use of System/Services) in Period#2, Strategic Innovation Promotion Programs (SIP)

Outline of Report

March, 2019

1. Outline of Survey

(1) Survey/Analysis on Influences/Effects on Traffic FlowFormulate the plan on traffic-flow survey in Waterfront/Haneda Area: Conduct survey.Conduct the survey on demand by development plan to execute traffic simulation.Construct the database of fundamental data for conducting verification test andstudying apply of infrastructures based on the above survey:e.g., Study for necessity of simulation on changes of influences/effects

(2) Formulation of Verification Plan/Work Schedule, Progress Management(Secretariat Division in Task Force)Conduct related secretariat div. by holding Task Force meetings to arrange the workschedule on infrastructure construction: Coordinate with the stakeholders.Coordinate the individual meeting dates and inquire about opinions on issue lists(draft)/work schedule (draft) for the preparation of Task Force meetings.

1

Survey PurposeVerify the impacts on the existing usual traffic flow in introducing necessary infrastructures, new traffic control/regulation system for the automated-driving verification test.

Survey Target/ContentsTokyo Waterfront City Area: ① 1-Chome, AOMI

② DAIBA③ Tokyo Keisatsu-Sho Mae

Haneda Airport Area : ① Signalized intersection →② Diverging/Merging section→ Survey of traffic volume③ Terminal front road → Survey of departure/arrival *Grasp of time/stand-by place④ Overall route → Survey of travel speed

Survey Period7:00 to 19:00 *Sep. 9th (Sun.) & Sep. 12th (Wed.) *International Terminal Intersection (tentative name): Survey on a 24-hour basis, until 7:00 on Sep. 10th (Sun.) & Sep.13th (Thurs.)

：Traffic Volume + Pedestrian Volume + Traffic-Jam/Storage Length：Traffic Volume Only：Signal Indication：Survey of Travel Speed：Survey of Departure/Arrival Situation

(Tentative Name) InternationalTerminal Intersection

2. Survey/Analysis on Influences/Effects on Traffic Flow (Survey Plan)

2

【Tokyo Waterfront City Area】【Haneda Airport Area】

② Intersection, DAIBA

① Intersection, 1-Chome AOMI

③ Intersection, Tokyo-Wangan Keisatsu-Sho Mae

Survey of traffic flow/volume, traffic-jam/storage length, and signal indication

Survey of traffic flow/volume, traffic-jam/storage length and signal indication

3. Survey/Analysis on Influences/Effects on Traffic Flow(Survey Result: Tokyo Waterfront City Area)

3

① Intersection, 1-Chome, AOMI

Tokyo Waterfront City Area: More vehicles/pedestrians on weekdays than holidays, except 1-Chome, AOMI1-Chome, AOMI: No traffic jams occurred, despite numerous straight-going vehicles to the south on weekdays.

Temporary traffic jams occurred around 11:00: Numerous left-turn vehicles to the north on holidays.DAIBA: No traffic jams occurred, despite numerous straight-going/left-turn vehicles to the west on both days.Tokyo-Wangan Keisatsu-Sho Mae: Numerous vehicles to the west on both days: High percentage of the straight-going vehicles on

weekdays, while more left-turn vehicles on holidays

② Intersection, DAIBA

③ Tokyo-Wangan Keisatsu-Sho Mae 状況写真

Ⅰ

Ⅵ. High Rate of the Straight-Going Vehicles 【Weekday】

Ⅴ. Traffic Jam by the Left-Turn Vehicles Masses 【Holiday】

Ⅰ. Many Pedestrians to the South to East 【Holiday】

Ⅱ. High Rate of the Straight-Going Vehicles 【Weekday】

Ⅲ. High Rate of the Left-Turn Vehicles 【Holiday】

Ⅳ. High Rate of the Straight-Going/Left-Turn Vehicles【Weekday】

Ⅱ

Ⅲ

Ⅵ

Ⅴ

Ⅳ

4,460 4,598

6,971

1,007

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

流入1 流入2 流入3 流入4

（台/12h）

17,036

110

150

170

70

0

20

0 0 0

50

100

150

200


（ｍ）

4,902 4,230 4,225

1,820

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000


（台/12h）

15,177150

90

70

90 100

20

0 0 0

50

100

150

200


（ｍ）

867

5,819

1,932

2,884

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000


（台/12h）

11,502

40

100

50

70

0 0 0 0 0

50

100

150

200


（ｍ）

1,535

6,177

2,986

4,017

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000


（台/12h）

14,715

70 70

90

60

20 20

40

10

0

50

100

150

200


（ｍ）

2,468

332 1,011 636

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000


（台/12h）

4,447

20 30 30

40

0 0 0 0 0

50

100

150

200


（ｍ）

2,860

597 927 282

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000


（台/12h）

4,666

80

40

20 20

0 0 0 0 0

50

100

150

200


（ｍ）

① ② ③ ④

① ② ③ ④

① ② ③ ④

① ② ③ ④

① ② ③ ④

① ② ③ ④ ① ② ③ ④

① ② ③ ④

① ② ③ ④ ① ② ③ ④

① ② ③ ④

① ② ③ ④

Traffic Volume Per Direction

Max. Traffic-Storage/Jam Length

Intersection

①AOM

I

②DAIB

A

③Tokyo-Wangan

Weekday Holiday

Figure in box: Total traffic volume in intersection

・Traffic storage occurred: Almost no traffic jams occurred even on holidays with lots of vehicles/pedestrians except a part of the area.・Temporary traffic jams occurred at 1-Chome, AOMI on holidays: No influences on the neighboring intersections 4

①

②

③

④

①

②

③

④

①

②

③

④

左折直進右折左折直進右折




Left-turn Straight Right-turn Left-turn Straight Right-turn

Flow 1 Flow 2 Flow 3 Flow 4

Flow 1 Flow 2 Flow 3 Flow 4

Max. traffic storage length

Max. traffic jam length



2,379 2,728 1,540 2,461

152 114

131 119

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000


人(台)/12h

歩行者：9,108自転車：516

7,388 6,623

1,471

11,630

578 182

162

229

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000


人(台)/12h

歩行者：27,112自転車：1,151

5,464 5,319

1,797

8,021

327 84

112

137

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000


人(台)/12h

歩行者：20,601自転車：660

284 1,794

569 549 23

39

13 74

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000


人(台)/12h

歩行者：3,196自転車：149

197 1,095 462 1,060 25

30 15

79

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000


人(台)/12h

歩行者：2,814自転車：149

1,538 1,079 966 2,041

155 193 141

119

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000


人(台)/12h

歩行者：5,624自転車：605

① ② ③ ④

① ② ③ ④

① ② ③ ④① ② ③ ④

① ② ③ ④

① ② ③ ④

5

Vehicle/Pedestrian VolumeIntersection

AOM

ID

AIBA Tokyo-W

angan

Weekday Holiday


①

②

③

④

①

②

③

④

①

②

③

④


Vehicle/Pedestrian Volume

Pedestrians Bicycles Pedestrians Bicycles

Pedestrians: 2,814Bicycles : 149



Pedestrians: 27,112Bicycles : 1,151



6*International Terminal Intersection (tentative name): Survey on a 24-hour basis, considering the influences of night

Intersection ①

Haneda Airport Area: More traffic volume on weekdays compared with holidaysIntersection ①: Numerous southside right-turn/straight-going vehicles on both days: Temporary traffic jams occurred around 8:00.Intersection ②: Numerous westside left-turn vehicles on both days: No traffic jams occurred.Intersection ③: Numerous westside straight-going/left-turn vehicles on both days: Temporary traffic jams occurred around 16:00 on weekdays.

Intersection ②

Intersection ③

Ⅰ. Traffic Jam by Masses of the Right-Turn/Oncoming-Straight-Going Vehicles

【Weekday】

Ⅱ. Traffic Jam by Masses of the Left-Turn Vehicles【Weekday】

Ⅴ. High Rate of the Left-Turn Vehicles【Weekday】

Ⅳ. Bus Stop at the General-VehicleGetting In/Out Area 【Weekday】

Ⅲ. Many Vehicles at the General-Vehicle Getting In/Out Area【Holiday】

Ⅰ

Ⅱ

ⅢⅣ

Ⅴ

3. Survey/Analysis on Influences/Effects on Traffic Flow(Survey Result: Haneda Airport Area)

2nd ZONE

6,206

3,652

5,384

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

流入1 流入2 流入3

（台/12h）

15,242

120

70

220

40 20

90

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400


（ｍ）

4,525 4,289 4,480

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000


（台/12h）

13,294

120

180 150

40 50

110

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400


（ｍ）

3,788

5,584 6,238

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000


（台/12h）

15,610

110 100

150

10 30 40

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400


（ｍ）

3,537 3,783 4,984

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000


（台/12h）

12,304

60

120 120

10 20 10

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400


（ｍ）

5,929

10,527

6,749

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000


（台/12h）

23,205

100

340

50

0

250

0 0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400


（ｍ）

5,189

8,593

4,477

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000


（台/12h）

18,259

160 170

120

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400


（ｍ）

① ② ③

① ② ③

① ② ③ ① ② ③

① ② ③

① ② ③

① ② ③

① ② ③

① ② ③ ① ② ③

① ② ③

① ② ③

7

方向別交通量最大滞留長・渋滞長Intersection 方向別交通量最大滞留長・渋滞長

Intersection

①

Intersection

②

Intersection

③

Weekday Holiday

①

②

③

①

②③

①

②③


Haneda Airport Area: Temporary traffic jams occurred by masses of the straight-going, right-/left-turn vehicles.










Max. traffic jam lengthLeft-turn Straight Right-turn Left-turn Straight Right-turn

8

Haneda Airport Area: More vehicles on weekdays compared with holidaysIntersection ④: Numerous westside right-turn vehicles on both days: Temporary traffic jams occurred around 7:00 on weekdays.Intersection ⑤: Numerous east/westside straight-going vehicles on both days: No traffic jams were observed.Intersection ⑥: Numerous eastside right-turn vehicles on both days: Temporary traffic jams occurred around 8:00 on weekdays.

Intersection ④

Intersection ⑤

Intersection ⑥Ⅱ. Traffic Jam by Masses of the Right-Turn Vehicles 【Weekday】

Ⅳ. Traffic Jam by Masses of the Right-Turn Vehicles 【Weekday】

Ⅰ. High Rate of the Straight-Going Vehicles 【Holiday】

Ⅲ. High Rate of the Straight-Going Vehicles 【Holiday】

Ⅰ

Ⅲ

Ⅱ

Ⅳ


1st ZONE

11,603

4,037

6,675

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000


（台/12h）

22,315

190

300

120

10

110

0 0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400


（ｍ）

8,839

3,506

5,287

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000


（台/12h）

17,632

140

100 90

0 0 0 0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400


（ｍ）

5,866

1,242

6,745

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000


（台/12h）

13,853

100

50 60

0 0 0 0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400


（ｍ）

4,952

607

5,189

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000


（台/12h）

10,748

200

50

100

0 0 0 0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400


（ｍ）

3,604 2,731

6,011

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000


（台/12h）

12,346

110 80

210

70 40

100

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400


（ｍ）

3,217 2,107

4,107

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000


（台/12h）

9,431

50

150 120

20 0 20

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400


（ｍ）

① ② ③ ① ② ③

① ② ③ ① ② ③

① ② ③① ② ③

① ② ③

① ② ③

① ② ③ ① ② ③

① ② ③

① ② ③

Haneda Airport Area: Temporary traffic jams occurred by masses of the right-turn vehicles. 9

方向別交通量最大滞留長・渋滞長方向別交通量最大滞留長・渋滞長Intersection

Intersection

④

Intersection

⑤

Intersection

⑥

Weekday Holiday

①

②

③

①

②

③

①

② ③











Max. traffic jam lengthLeft-turn Straight Right-turn Left-turn Straight Right-turn

Calculation on the intersection demand factor in two cases of the current (as of Sep 2018) / future (as of verification test conduct ≒ as of Year 2020)Haneda Airport Area: Calculated based on the future traffic volume to get data on future volume.

Traffic capacity ratio was also calculated to verify influences by bus lanes.

Main calculation conditions: Table

【Tokyo Waterfront City Area：3 Intersections】【Haneda Airport Are： 6 Intersections: 4 Sections】

Area CaseConditions

Road Structure Signal Indication Traffic Volume

Tokyo Waterfront City

Current Current Current CurrentFuture Same as Current Partly improved Current

Haneda AirportCurrent Current Current CurrentFuture Time of Haneda Access Road in service: 2020 Partly improved Future volume in 2030

Calculation-target locations on intersection demand factor and traffic capacity ratio

：Intersection Demand Factor calculation location ：Traffic Capacity Ratio calculation section

10

4. Survey/Analysis on Influences/Effects on Traffic Flow(Evaluation of Intersection Demand Factor: Calculation Conditions)

Based on the traffic-volume survey result (= current volume), demand factor in peak hours was calculated.Intersection, 1-Chome, AOMI: The demand factor was calculated in introducing the right-turn/straight-going separation system as the future case.Intersection demand factor:Less than 0.9, no problems were posed in intersection traffic control in the current/future case

0.434(0.402)

Intersection, 1-Chome, AOMI

-(0.129)

Intersection, Tokyo-WanganKeisatsu-Sho Mae

-(0.409)

Intersection, DAIBA

Demand factor(Reference value:1)

Intersection name：Improved signal applied: Current volume (Sep. 12th 2018)：Current signal indication: Current volume (Sep. 9th 2018)

*Peak hours’ setting is based on the peak hoursin total traffic flow volume in each intersection.

11

4. Survey/Analysis on Influences/Effects on Traffic Flow(Evaluation of Intersection Demand Factor: Calculation Conditions)

２

５

６

９1st ZONE

2nd ZONE

１

Hotel

３

４

７

８

10

Based on the current traffic volume/future volume in 2030, the demand factor in peak hours was calculated.By applying road structure of Haneda Access Road in service in the future case, demand factor was calculated: Regarding the intersections at International Line West and at 2-Chome, Nishi, Airport, the demand factor was calculated in introducing the right-turn/straight-going separation system.Intersection demand factor: Below 0.9, no problems were posed in intersection traffic control in the current/future case.

0.410(0.663)

Haneda Airport 2-Chome Nishi

Demand factor(Reference value:1)

Intersection name：Applied improved signal, Future volume in 2030

：Current signal indication, Current volume (Sep. 12th 2020)0.253(0.214)

Tenku-Bashi-Eki Mae

0.590(0.706)

Haneda Airport 2-Chome

0.376(0.374)

International Line West

0.371(0.703)

International Line East

・ The right-turn storage length in separating the right-turn/straight-going vehicles: Excess of the right-turn length from Haneda-Airport, 2-Chome. intersection・ The right-turn/straight-going separation: Planned to

conduct with conditions (measures for traffic-storage length)

12

4. Survey/Analysis on Influences/Effects on Traffic Flow(Evaluation of Intersection Demand Factor: Calculation Result)

*Peak hours’ setting is based on the peak hours in total traffic flow volume in each intersection.

２

５

６

９1st ZONE

2nd ZONE１

Hotel

３

４

７

８

10

Sections (③④⑥⑦⑧) where bus-lane introduction is considered:The traffic capacity ratio in the case of one-lane reduction was calculated as the future case.Some sections: The rate was over 1, but most sections: The rate was below 1, assuming TDM.

Conditions on streets: The value of 0.90 was always applied due to adequate exclusion of parked/stopped vehicles.Year 2030： Calculated by values corrected by composition ratio per direction/vehicle type and peak time ration of current traffic-volume-survey result based on future-traffic-volume estimate result.Assumed Year 2030, TDM: Calculated by flat-reduction value (10%) of traffic volume on the assumption that total of traffic volume is reduced by 10% due to TDM measurements that Organizing Committee of Olympic/Paralympic Games work on against the above year of 2030.

*1： Design hourly volume (number of vehicles/time)Calculated traffic volume (number of vehicles/time) as 30th time volume in target year for planning against planned traffic volume (number of vehicles/time)

*2： Design traffic capacity (number of vehicles/time)Traffic capacity (number of vehicles/time) where allowable degree of capacity excess in peak hours (= services level) is considered, against possible traffic capacity (number of vehicles/time) calculated based on various correction factors such as lane width or mix of large vehicles.

Traffic capacity ratio = Design hourly volume*1 (number of vehicles/time)÷ Design traffic capacity*2 (number of vehicles/time)

13

4. Survey/Analysis on Influences/Effects on Traffic Flow(Evaluation of Intersection Demand Factor: Calculation Result)

Transit Bus only: Running on bus Lane All Buses (Transit /Chartered/Private): Running on bus Lane

Sec. ③-1 Sec. ③-2 Sec. ④ Sec. ⑥-1 Sec. ⑥-2 Sec. ⑦ Sec. ⑧ Sec. ③-1 Sec. ③-2 Sec. ④ Sec. ⑥-1 Sec. ⑥-2 Sec. ⑦ Sec. ⑧

Year: 2030 0.83 0.81 1.00 1.18 0.78 1.07 0.44 0.81 0.79 0.99 1.17 0-.77 1.06 0.43

Assumed2030: TDM 0.75 0.73 0.90 1.07 0.70 0.97 0.39 0.73 0.71 0.89 1.06 0.70 0.96 0.39

14

5. Formulation of Verification Plan/Work Schedule, Progress Management (Verification-Test Task Force for Tokyo Waterfront Area in 2020)

Task Force on verification test for Tokyo Waterfront Area in 2020:In charge of the secretariat div. for the meetings 8 times in total during August 2018 to March 2019 Preparing/Updating issue-management lists/work schedules:In order to clarify the issues/prep status of each stakeholder Conduct of individual coordination meeting with each stakeholder: In order to prepare/update the issue-management lists/work schedules

Holding Task Force meetings NAME DATE/TIME

#4 Task Force on Verification Test for Tokyo Waterfront Area in 2020 Aug. 22nd (Wed.) in 2018, 10：00 to 12：00

#5 Task Force on Verification Test for Tokyo Waterfront Area in 2020 Sep. 26th (Wed.) in 2018, 10：00 to 12：00

#6 Task Force on Verification Test for Tokyo Waterfront Area in 2020 Oct. 24th (Wed.) in 2018, 10：00 to 12：00

#7 Task Force on Verification Test for Tokyo Waterfront Area in 2020 Nov. 21st (Wed.) in 2018, 10：00 to 12：00

#8 Task Force on Verification Test for Tokyo Waterfront Area in 2020 Dec. 19th (Wed.) in 2018, 10：00 to 12：00

#9 Task Force on Verification Test for Tokyo Waterfront Area in 2020 Jan. 23rd (Wed.) in 2019, 10：00 to 12：00

#1 Task Force on Verification Test for Tokyo Waterfront Area Feb. 28th (Thurs.) in 2019, 16：00 to 17：00

#2 Task Force on Verification Test for Tokyo Waterfront Area Mar. 20th (Wed.) in 2019, 10：00 to 11：30

Coordination with each stakeholderCoordination on infrastructure development was conducted with the main stakeholders below.

Haneda Airport area : Civil Aviation Bureau, MLIT; National Police Agency; and Metropolitan Police DepartmentMetropolitan Expressway: Road Bureau, MLIT; NILIM, MLIT; and Metropolitan Expressway Co., Ltd.Tokyo Waterfront area : Tokyo Metropolis, National Police Agency, and Metropolitan Police Department

outline of reportintersection ④: numerous westside right-turn vehicles on both days: temporary...

Documents