Welcome! PROGRAM MEETING

July 18, 2011

OSEP Personnel Development

Program

1

Agenda

Program Performance Measure Results 2010

Using the Louisiana Data Longitudinal System to Improve Teacher Preparation

Discussions on Program Improvement

Grant Priority or Focus Room Number

LeadershipLow IncidenceEarly ChildhoodRelated ServicesSecondary

TransitionHigh Incidence Paraprofessional

Washington 2Washington 4Washington 5Madison BBalcony AWashington 6Balcony B

Discussions (4:00-5:30)

Summer 2011 Doctoral Interns

University of Central FloridaUniversity of Massachusetts –

AmherstUniversity of North TexasUniversity of South

FloridaClemson UniversityUniversity of Northern Colorado

GOAL To prepare personnel in areas of critical need who are highly qualified to improve outcomes for children with disabilities

5

PDP Investments

Program Improvement

Program Improvement

Preparation National Centers

Program Evaluation

Program Evaluation

5

Program Objectives

Objective 1. Improve the curricula of IDEA training programs to ensure that personnel preparing to serve children with disabilities are knowledgeable and skilled in practices that reflect the current knowledge base. Objective 2. Increase the supply of teachers and service providers who are highly qualified for and serve in positions for which they are trained. Objective 3. Enhance the efficiency of the expenditure of Federal dollars under this program

Program Improvement

Training on - Preparing Annual Performance

ReportsUsing Logic ModelsWriting Performance MeasuresImproving Performance

Measurement Data Quality FY 2011 Priority Submission

Requirements

As required by the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) of 1993, OSEP has developed a strategic plan for measuring performance and will collect information to assess progress and performance.(P. A-3, FY 2011 325D, 325K, 325T Appl icat ion Package)

Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA)

Performance Measure 1 Percentage of projects that incorporate

evidence-based practices into their curricula.

20072008

20092010

0102030405060708090

100

41.555.5

48.7

91.3

Performance Measure 2Percentage of scholars completing OSEP- funded training programs who are knowledgeable and

skilled in evidence based practices for infants, toddlers, children, and youth with disabilities.

20062007

20082009

2010

05

1015202530354045

43.539.1

40.6

Performance Measure 3Percentage of program scholars who exit preparation programs prior to completion due to poor academic

performance

20062007

20082009

2010

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3 3

1.82

1.41.6

Performance Measure 4Percentage of funded degree/certification program recipients who are working in the area(s) in which they were trained upon program

completion.

20062007

20082009

2010

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

8075.3

69.469.7 73.273.4

Performance Measure 5 Percentage of funded degree/certification program recipients who are working in the area(s) in which they were trained upon program

completion and who are fully qualified under IDEA.

20062007

20082009

2010

01020304050607080

70.265.3

69

CHALLENGES: HQT status is determined by LEA teacher assignment. Therefore extreme caution must be used when drawing conclusions about the program, because data may represent economic conditions rather than PDP program quality. Consider providing TA on teacher assignments to targeted states.

Performance Measure 7 The Federal cost per degree/certification program recipient who completed the program.

20072008

20092010

23000

23500

24000

24500

25000

25500

23,763

25,12324,774

24,418