1 update on the personnel preparation program student data report: purpose, results, and issues dr....
TRANSCRIPT
1
Update on the Personnel Preparation Program Student Data Report: Purpose, Results, and Issues
Dr. Bonnie Jones, OSEP
Karen Schroll, Westat
Dr. Marsha Brauen, Westat
2
Student Data Report (SDR)
OSEP collects data annually on students who are receiving OSEP grant support.
Grantees enter student-level data for each student supported on the grant.
The report provides a full profile of students as they enter, progress through, and exit grant-supported training programs.
3
Student Data Report (continued)
Student characteristics (e.g., gender, age) Student training and employment prior to
entry in grant-supported training Current training information (e.g., degree
pursuing, training area) Employment during training Student status at exit from grant-supported
training Employment information at exit from grant-
supported training
4
www.OSEPppd.org
Data are collected online. Grantees receive a user ID and password. They have 60 days to enter data. The website includes the following reports:
Summary of data entered for each student; Summary of key items for each student on
grant. Data from FY2001, FY2002, FY2003, and
FY2004 are posted on the homepage.
5
History of data collection
Piloted in FY2000 Data collected for FY2001, FY2002,
FY2003, and FY2004 Purpose: To provide OSEP with
information needed to assess the effectiveness of the resources expended to train educators
6
Response rates
87.496.0 97.3 98.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
FY2001 FY2002 FY2003 FY2004Per
cent
of
Gra
ntee
s R
espo
ndin
g
7
Reporting good data
Grantees: Report data only on students funded with OSEP
monies Use the same ID for a student each year – they do
not create a new ID for a student each year; Keep a list of the IDs assigned to their students; and Exit students from the system when they stop funding
them. Students are considered to have completed training
when they complete all courses grantees intended to fund them for.
8
Who are we training?
Data on students new to grant-supported training in FY2004
9
Gender
15.4%
84.6%
Male
Female
10
Race/ethnicity
1.2
3.0
12.0
10.1
1.7
1.4
70.6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
White
More than one race
Percent
11
Disability status
5.0%7.1%
87.9%
Don't know
Has a disability
Does not have adisability
12
Age
7.9
15.1
26.0
1.5
49.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
50 and over
40 - 49
30 - 39
21 - 29
Under 21
Percent
13
Prior degree area
21.9%
43.0%
35.1%General education
Special education orrelated services
Outside of education
14
Status at the end of FY2004
N %
Completed the program 2,473 32.3
Active participant 4,467 58.3
Exited prior to completion 721 9.41
15
Completion status
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Per
cen
t
FY2001 FY2002 FY2003 FY2004
Completed theprogram
Activeparticipant
Exited prior tocompletion
16
What factors are related to completion and noncompletion of the training program?
17
Reasons for exiting prior to completion – FY2004
N %
Continued enrollment in this or another training program, but no OSEP monies provided
203 29.2
Grant support terminated due to grant ending 135 19.4
Poor academic/ field-based performance 97 14.0
Other personal reasons 80 11.5
Multiple exit reasons 72 10.4
Transfer to another program in special education 35 5.0
Health of self or family 27 3.9
Moved 14 2.0
Multiple personal reasons 14 2.0
Obtained employment 12 1.7
Transfer to another program not in special education 5 0.7
Financial stress or burden 1 0.1
Total 695 99.9
Frequency missing = 26
18
Gender and program completion
Male Female
Completed the program 31577.4%
2,13782.5%
Did not complete the program 9222.6%
45517.6%
Total 407100%
2,592100%
19
Percent of students who did not complete the program
77.9
22.1
77.5
22.4
78.9
21.1
83.2
16.8
0
20
40
60
80
100
Per
cen
t
FY2001 FY2002 FY2003 FY2004
Male
Female
20
Race/ethnicity and program completion
White(non
Hispanic)Non-White
Completed the program 1,73883.0%
71078.5%
Did not complete the program
35617.0%
19421.5%
Total 2,094100%
904100%
21
Percent of students who did not complete the program
59.8
40.2
63.4
36.6
60.4
39.6
64.7
35.3
0
20
40
60
80
100
Per
cen
t
FY2001 FY2002 FY2003 FY2004
Non-White
White (non-Hispanic)
22
Disability status and program completion
Has a disability
Does not have a
disability
Completed the program 17577.8%
2,16482.9%
Did not complete the program
5022.2%
44517.1%
Total 225100%
2,609100%
23
Percent of students who did not complete the program
91.6
8.4
90.3
9.7
87.8
12.2
89.9
10.1
0
20
40
60
80
100
Per
cen
t
FY2001 FY2002 FY2003 FY2004
Has a disability
Does not have adisability
24
Percent of students who did not complete the program, by age
3.3%
46.8%
27.4%
14.3%
8.2%
Under 21
21 - 29
30 - 39
40 - 49
50 and over
25
Percent of students who did not complete the program
66.4
33.6
65.7
34.3
55.3
44.7
50.1
49.9
0
20
40
60
80
100
Per
cen
t
FY2001 FY2002 FY2003 FY2004
Under 30
30 and older
26
Degree pursued and program completion among program exiters
Postdoc/ PhD
Ed Spec
Ed Spec and
State Cred
Masters Masters and
State Cred
Bach Assoc State Cred
Grantee Endors/ Courses
only
Completed the
program
6050.0%
10370.1%
7670.4%
74084.2%
60088.0%
19174.3%
7980.6%
38484.0%
23187.2%
Did not complete
the program
6050.0%
4429.9%
3229.6%
13915.8%
8212.0%
6625.7%
1919.4%
7316.0%
3412.8%
Total 120100%
147100%
108100%
879100%
682100%
257100%
98100%
457100%
265100%
27
Questions?
Please feel free to contact us.Karen Schroll (301) 610-4856
Bonnie Jones (202) [email protected]