oak ridge national laboratory u. s. department of energy 1 hybrid poplar production in minnesota on...
TRANSCRIPT
1OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Hybrid Poplar Production in Minnesota on a Large
Scale
Mark DowningAgricultural Economist
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
2OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Acknowledgements
• A diverse presentation such as this one benefits from years of on-going collaboration with a variety of backgrounds and disciplines and circumstances. I would like to thank:
• Kate Baldwin, Janet Cushman, Lynn Wright, Anthony Turhollow, Lynn Kszos, Marie Walsh, Bob Perlack, John Stoll, Rick Freeman, Gregg Marland, Robin Graham, Randy Curlee, Rick Pierce, Ron Stoffel, Bob Hansen, Ralph Overend, Teofilo Ozuna, Jonathan Overly, Greg Larson, Dean Schmidt, Ernie Schmitt, Jerry Tuskan, Tom Kroll, Bill Bergusen, Don Riemenschneider, Dan Langseth, Dan Netzer, Terri Lundblad, Sarah Rensink, Sheila Faber, Eric Streed, JoAnn Joannides, Scott Josiah, Burt English, John Ferrell and Steve Hanson.
• Notwithstanding their invaluable contributions, any mistakes or errors within this presentation remain my own responsibility. The views necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. Government, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and UT-Battelle.
3OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
MN hybrid poplar
• Some project history• Methodology to collect data• Look at cost and yield• Current status• What’s next
4OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Background
• Collaboration• Motivation
– RD&D– Process– Data
collection
5OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Assumptions
• ~1500 acres• 4 clones planted in 1994• 17 landowners• Data collection• Synthesis and analysis
6OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Data Caveat
• May be incomplete• May be incorrect or imprecise• May be miscalculated• May be misleading• Annual costs vs field summaries
7OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Cost of productionAnnual Per-Acre Hybrid Poplar Production Costs
(Range shown by vertical bars; site average shown by line)
(50)
-
50
100
150
200
250
300
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Stand Age
Co
st p
er
acr
e
8OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Cost of productionoffset disk and plow 15.00tandem disk 8.00disk/chisel 15.00Round- up application 19.00tandem disk cultivate/harrow 8.00burn down and herbicide as needed 10.00apply Linuron/Lorox 34.00tree stock/ship/store 73.00planting cost (8X8) spacing 49.00first cultivation 10.00second cultivation 10.00third cultivation 10.00herbicide application 15.00 AVERAGE COST PER ACRE 276.00
9OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Cost of productionLandowner 14 Operation 1 (1994) 2 3 4 5 6 7
(2000)
Field size 121
Yield Per acre increment 1.618 3.892 5.207 6.652
Site increment 195 469 6.28 802
Cumulative per acre
1.62 5.51 10.72 17.32
Total Cost
Site preparation cultivate 1941
herbicide 2376
Total Preparation 4317
Maintenance Stock 8276 26
Plant 5750 15
Total Planting 14026 41
Maintenance Cultivate/mow 504 756 296 44
herbicide 2703 712 3721 48
insecticide 92 1418 2770 1149
Total Maintenance 3207 1468 4017 136 1466 2770 1149
Average Costs 179 13 33 1 12 23 10
10OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Figure 2Relationship Between Total Cost and Field Size
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Field Size in Acres
$/ac
re i
n
Yea
rs 1
an
d 2
11OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Figure 3 Relationship Between
Maintenance Cost and Field Size
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350Field size in acres
Main
en
an
ce c
ost
in
$/a
cre
years
1-3
12OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Yield
• Weed competition• Soil structure• Landowner commitment• Hand plant vs machine plant• Soil variability
13OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Cost threeFigure 4Site average hybrid poplar production (cumulative)
[Thick line is average of the average across all sites]
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Stand Age
Dry
tons
per
acr
e
16OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Results
• Project with available data• Best of the best clones planted• Pesticide/herbicide labeling• Collaboration – public/private• Synthesis and analysis• New clone sampling on site
17OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Discussion
• Tough to deal with landowners• USDA and DOE funding• USDA and DOE policy• Data collection is tough• Synthesis and analysis
18OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Now what?
• Data collection• DNR scaling, auction and harvest• Highest and best use• CRP• Research continuity