northern nevada teaching american history project october 2011 debating the constitution...

45
Northern nevada teaching american history project October 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Upload: keeley-hudgens

Post on 15-Jan-2016

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Northern nevada teaching american history project

October 2011

Debating the ConstitutionAnti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-

1788

Page 2: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Recap: the process of writing & ratifying the Constitution

A. The Federal Convention, Philadelphia, May-September 1787

Page 3: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Recap: the process of writing & ratifying the Constitution

A. The Federal Convention, Philadelphia, May-September 1787

B. The ratification process in the states and among the people, September 1787-July 1788 (and all the way to 1790 in Rhode Island)

Page 4: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Analysis #1: Essays of Brutus, Number 1

A. Opening paragraphs: the importance of this moment, and of this debate. Posterity will remember you for what you decide now—and for the results of your decision (liberty or tyranny).

Page 5: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Analysis #1: Essays of Brutus, Number 1

A. Opening paragraphs: the importance of this moment, and of this debate. Posterity will remember you for what you decide now—and for the results of your decision (liberty or tyranny).

B. Key point (third paragraph): “when the people once part with power, they can seldom or never resume it again but by force.” So be careful what you decide now.

Page 6: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Analysis #1: Essays of Brutus, Number 1

A. Opening paragraphs: the importance of this moment, and of this debate. Posterity will remember you for what you decide now—and for the results of your decision (liberty or tyranny).

B. Key point (third paragraph): “when the people once part with power, they can seldom or never resume it again but by force.” So be careful what you decide now.

C. Brutus’s big question: Can a unified (consolidated) government work over a territory as vast, and a population as large, as that of the United States—while still preserving the people’s liberty?

Page 7: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

“one great republic,” or “thirteen confederated republics”?OR: Can a consolidated government work over a territory as

broad, and a population as large, as the United States?

Point of agreement: we all want a free government.

Page 8: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

“one great republic,” or “thirteen confederated republics”?OR: Can a consolidated government work over a territory as

broad, and a population as large, as the United States?

Democracy? No: won’t work in such a large territory.

Point of agreement: we all want a free government.

Page 9: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

“one great republic,” or “thirteen confederated republics”?OR: Can a consolidated government work over a territory as

broad, and a population as large, as the United States?

Democracy? No: won’t work in such a large territory.

Republic? Sure—but what is a good representative?

Point of agreement: we all want a free government.

Page 10: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

“one great republic,” or “thirteen confederated republics”?OR: Can a consolidated government work over a territory as

broad, and a population as large, as the United States?

Democracy? No: won’t work in such a large territory.

Republic? Sure—but what is a good representative?

Knows the mind and shares the views of his constituents

Point of agreement: we all want a free government.

Page 11: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

“one great republic,” or “thirteen confederated republics”?OR: Can a consolidated government work over a territory as

broad, and a population as large, as the United States?

Democracy? No: won’t work in such a large territory.

Republic? Sure—but what is a good representative?

Knows the mind and shares the views of his constituents

Classical republics: small territory; homogeneous populations

Point of agreement: we all want a free government.

Page 12: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

“one great republic,” or “thirteen confederated republics”?OR: Can a consolidated government work over a territory as

broad, and a population as large, as the United States?

Democracy? No: won’t work in such a large territory.

Republic? Sure—but what is a good representative?

Knows the mind and shares the views of his constituents

In a vast republic, you’d need so many representatives in Congress that nothing could get done.

Classical republics: small territory; homogeneous populations

Point of agreement: we all want a free government.

Page 13: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

“one great republic,” or “thirteen confederated republics”?OR: Can a consolidated government work over a territory as

broad, and a population as large, as the United States?

Democracy? No: won’t work in such a large territory.

Republic? Sure—but what is a good representative?

Knows the mind and shares the views of his constituents

In a vast republic, you’d need so many representatives in Congress that nothing could get done.

Classical republics: small territory; homogeneous populations

Point of agreement: we all want a free government.

OR, you’d have too few representatives to reflect the variety of interests.

Page 14: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

“one great republic,” or “thirteen confederated republics”?OR: Can a consolidated government work over a territory as

broad, and a population as large, as the United States?

Democracy? No: won’t work in such a large territory.

Republic? Sure—but what is a good representative?

Knows the mind and shares the views of his constituents

In a vast republic, you’d need so many representatives in Congress that nothing could get done.

Classical republics: small territory; homogeneous populations

And in a vast republic, there’d always be clashing interests—nothing could get done.

Point of agreement: we all want a free government.

OR, you’d have too few representatives to reflect the variety of interests.

Page 15: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

“one great republic,” or “thirteen confederated republics”?OR: Can a consolidated government work over a territory as

broad, and a population as large, as the United States?

Democracy? No: won’t work in such a large territory.

Republic? Sure—but what is a good representative?

Knows the mind and shares the views of his constituents

In a vast republic, you’d need so many representatives in Congress that nothing could get done.

Classical republics: small territory; homogeneous populations

And in a vast republic, there’d always be clashing interests—nothing could get done.

Point of agreement: we all want a free government.

How are the laws executed (carried out)?

The government maintains a standing army to enforce them.

The people come to the aid of the magistrate, when called.

OR, you’d have too few representatives to reflect the variety of interests.

Page 16: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

“one great republic,” or “thirteen confederated republics”?OR: Can a consolidated government work over a territory as

broad, and a population as large, as the United States?

Democracy? No: won’t work in such a large territory.

Republic? Sure—but what is a good representative?

Knows the mind and shares the views of his constituents

In a vast republic, you’d need so many representatives in Congress that nothing could get done.

Classical republics: small territory; homogeneous populations

And in a vast republic, there’d always be clashing interests—nothing could get done.

Point of agreement: we all want a free government.

How are the laws executed (carried out)?

The government maintains a standing army to enforce them.

The people come to the aid of the magistrate, when called.

Who pays for that army? The people, through taxes.

OR, you’d have too few representatives to reflect the variety of interests.

Page 17: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

“one great republic,” or “thirteen confederated republics”?OR: Can a consolidated government work over a territory as

broad, and a population as large, as the United States?

Democracy? No: won’t work in such a large territory.

Republic? Sure—but what is a good representative?

Knows the mind and shares the views of his constituents

In a vast republic, you’d need so many representatives in Congress that nothing could get done.

Classical republics: small territory; homogeneous populations

And in a vast republic, there’d always be clashing interests—nothing could get done.

Point of agreement: we all want a free government.

How are the laws executed (carried out)?

The government maintains a standing army to enforce them.

The people come to the aid of the magistrate, when called.

Who pays for that army? The people, through taxes.

What does the army do? Destroys the people’s liberty.

OR, you’d have too few representatives to reflect the variety of interests.

Page 18: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

“one great republic,” or “thirteen confederated republics”?OR: Can a consolidated government work over a territory as

broad, and a population as large, as the United States?

Democracy? No: won’t work in such a large territory.

Republic? Sure—but what is a good representative?

Knows the mind and shares the views of his constituents

In a vast republic, you’d need so many representatives in Congress that nothing could get done.

Classical republics: small territory; homogeneous populations

And in a vast republic, there’d always be clashing interests—nothing could get done.

Point of agreement: we all want a free government.

How are the laws executed (carried out)?

The government maintains a standing army to enforce them.

The people come to the aid of the magistrate, when called.

Who pays for that army? The people, through taxes.

What does the army do? Destroys the people’s liberty.

This happens only if the people have confidence in the magistrate.

OR, you’d have too few representatives to reflect the variety of interests.

Page 19: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

“one great republic,” or “thirteen confederated republics”?OR: Can a consolidated government work over a territory as

broad, and a population as large, as the United States?

Democracy? No: won’t work in such a large territory.

Republic? Sure—but what is a good representative?

Knows the mind and shares the views of his constituents

In a vast republic, you’d need so many representatives in Congress that nothing could get done.

Classical republics: small territory; homogeneous populations

And in a vast republic, there’d always be clashing interests—nothing could get done.

Point of agreement: we all want a free government.

How are the laws executed (carried out)?

The government maintains a standing army to enforce them.

The people come to the aid of the magistrate, when called.

Who pays for that army? The people, through taxes.

What does the army do? Destroys the people’s liberty.

This happens only if the people have confidence in the magistrate.

Confidence comes from knowing one’s rulers. Is that possible in a large republic?

OR, you’d have too few representatives to reflect the variety of interests.

Page 20: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

“one great republic,” or “thirteen confederated republics”?OR: Can a consolidated government work over a territory as

broad, and a population as large, as the United States?

Democracy? No: won’t work in such a large territory.

Republic? Sure—but what is a good representative?

Knows the mind and shares the views of his constituents

In a vast republic, you’d need so many representatives in Congress that nothing could get done.

Classical republics: small territory; homogeneous populations

And in a vast republic, there’d always be clashing interests—nothing could get done.

Point of agreement: we all want a free government.

How are the laws executed (carried out)?

The government maintains a standing army to enforce them.

The people come to the aid of the magistrate, when called.

Who pays for that army? The people, through taxes.

What does the army do? Destroys the people’s liberty.

This happens only if the people have confidence in the magistrate.

Confidence comes from knowing one’s rulers. Is that possible in a large republic?

Government will have to resort to force (army).

OR, you’d have too few representatives to reflect the variety of interests.

Page 21: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

“one great republic,” or “thirteen confederated republics”?OR: Can a consolidated government work over a territory as

broad, and a population as large, as the United States?

Democracy? No: won’t work in such a large territory.

Republic? Sure—but what is a good representative?

Knows the mind and shares the views of his constituents

In a vast republic, you’d need so many representatives in Congress that nothing could get done.

Classical republics: small territory; homogeneous populations

And in a vast republic, there’d always be clashing interests—nothing could get done.

Point of agreement: we all want a free government.

How are the laws executed (carried out)?

The government maintains a standing army to enforce them.

The people come to the aid of the magistrate, when called.

Who pays for that army? The people, through taxes.

What does the army do? Destroys the people’s liberty.

This happens only if the people have confidence in the magistrate.

Confidence comes from knowing one’s rulers. Is that possible in a large republic?

Government will have to resort to force (army).

OR, you’d have too few representatives to reflect the variety of interests. Conclusion: a consolidated, extended republic is

a recipe for destroying the people’s liberty.

Page 22: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Analysis #2: Madison, “The Federalist,” number 10

A. Madison’s big challenge: to explain how a republic—and the citizens’ liberty—can survive when the territory is as vast, and the population as large & diverse, as in the U.S.

Page 23: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Analysis #2: Madison, “The Federalist,” number 10

A. Madison’s big challenge: to explain how a republic—and the citizens’ liberty—can survive when the territory is as vast, and the population as large & diverse, as in the U.S.

B. The first paragraph: what’s a major advantage of a “well-constructed union”?

Page 24: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Analysis #2: Madison, “The Federalist,” number 10

A. Madison’s big challenge: to explain how a republic—and the citizens’ liberty—can survive when the territory is as vast, and the population as large & diverse, as in the U.S.

B. The first paragraph: what’s a major advantage of a “well-constructed union”?

C. Notice his language: with what kinds of words does he describe this problem?

Page 25: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Analysis #2: Madison, “The Federalist,” number 10

A. Madison’s big challenge: to explain how a republic—and the citizens’ liberty—can survive when the territory is as vast, and the population as large & diverse, as in the U.S.

B. The first paragraph: what’s a major advantage of a “well-constructed union”?

C. Notice his language: with what kinds of words does he describe this problem?

D. Second paragraph: What’s his definition of a FACTION?

Page 26: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Advantage of a well-constructed union:Break & control the violence of FACTION

Page 27: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Advantage of a well-constructed union:Break & control the violence of FACTION

Remove causes Control effects

Page 28: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Advantage of a well-constructed union:Break & control the violence of FACTION

Remove causes Control effects

Destroy liberty

Worse than the disease

Page 29: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Advantage of a well-constructed union:Break & control the violence of FACTION

Remove causes Control effects

Destroy liberty

Worse than the disease

Give everyone the same opinions

Impracticable

Page 30: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Advantage of a well-constructed union:Break & control the violence of FACTION

Remove causes Control effects

Destroy liberty

Worse than the disease

Give everyone the same opinions

Impracticable

Minority faction

No problem

Page 31: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Advantage of a well-constructed union:Break & control the violence of FACTION

Remove causes Control effects

Destroy liberty

Worse than the disease

Give everyone the same opinions

Impracticable

Minority faction

No problem

Majorityfaction

Page 32: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Advantage of a well-constructed union:Break & control the violence of FACTION

Remove causes Control effects

Destroy liberty

Worse than the disease

Give everyone the same opinions

Impracticable

Minority faction

No problem

Majorityfaction

PROBLEM: need to secure public good & private rights. HOW?

Page 33: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Advantage of a well-constructed union:Break & control the violence of FACTION

Remove causes Control effects

Destroy liberty

Worse than the disease

Give everyone the same opinions

Impracticable

Minority faction

No problem

Majorityfaction

PROBLEM: need to secure public good & private rights. HOW?

DEMOCRACY? No. (Why not?)

Page 34: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Advantage of a well-constructed union:Break & control the violence of FACTION

Remove causes Control effects

Destroy liberty

Worse than the disease

Give everyone the same opinions

Impracticable

Minority faction

No problem

Majorityfaction

PROBLEM: need to secure public good & private rights. HOW?

DEMOCRACY? No. (Why not?)

REPUBLIC?Yes! (Why?)

Republic = “refine & enlarge” the public views (representation)

Page 35: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Advantage of a well-constructed union:Break & control the violence of FACTION

Remove causes Control effects

Destroy liberty

Worse than the disease

Give everyone the same opinions

Impracticable

Minority faction

No problem

Majorityfaction

PROBLEM: need to secure public good & private rights. HOW?

DEMOCRACY? No. (Why not?)

REPUBLIC?Yes! (Why?)

Small republic?

Republic = “refine & enlarge” the public views (representation)

Page 36: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Advantage of a well-constructed union:Break & control the violence of FACTION

Remove causes Control effects

Destroy liberty

Worse than the disease

Give everyone the same opinions

Impracticable

Minority faction

No problem

Majorityfaction

PROBLEM: need to secure public good & private rights. HOW?

DEMOCRACY? No. (Why not?)

REPUBLIC?Yes! (Why?)

Small republic?

NO. Fewer factions = more chance that one will win. Fewer people = more chance that bad people will win.

Republic = “refine & enlarge” the public views (representation)

Page 37: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Advantage of a well-constructed union:Break & control the violence of FACTION

Remove causes Control effects

Destroy liberty

Worse than the disease

Give everyone the same opinions

Impracticable

Minority faction

No problem

Majorityfaction

PROBLEM: need to secure public good & private rights. HOW?

DEMOCRACY? No. (Why not?)

REPUBLIC?Yes! (Why?)

Small republic?

Large republic?

NO. Fewer factions = more chance that one will win. Fewer people = more chance that bad people will win.

Republic = “refine & enlarge” the public views (representation)

Page 38: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Advantage of a well-constructed union:Break & control the violence of FACTION

Remove causes Control effects

Destroy liberty

Worse than the disease

Give everyone the same opinions

Impracticable

Minority faction

No problem

Majorityfaction

PROBLEM: need to secure public good & private rights. HOW?

DEMOCRACY? No. (Why not?)

REPUBLIC?Yes! (Why?)

Small republic?

Large republic?

NO. Fewer factions = more chance that one will win. Fewer people = more chance that bad people will win.

Republic = “refine & enlarge” the public views (representation)

More citizens per rep.

Page 39: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Advantage of a well-constructed union:Break & control the violence of FACTION

Remove causes Control effects

Destroy liberty

Worse than the disease

Give everyone the same opinions

Impracticable

Minority faction

No problem

Majorityfaction

PROBLEM: need to secure public good & private rights. HOW?

DEMOCRACY? No. (Why not?)

REPUBLIC?Yes! (Why?)

Small republic?

Large republic?

NO. Fewer factions = more chance that one will win. Fewer people = more chance that bad people will win.

Republic = “refine & enlarge” the public views (representation)

More citizens per rep.

Harder for bad people to win by bribery

Page 40: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Advantage of a well-constructed union:Break & control the violence of FACTION

Remove causes Control effects

Destroy liberty

Worse than the disease

Give everyone the same opinions

Impracticable

Minority faction

No problem

Majorityfaction

PROBLEM: need to secure public good & private rights. HOW?

DEMOCRACY? No. (Why not?)

REPUBLIC?Yes! (Why?)

Small republic?

Large republic?

NO. Fewer factions = more chance that one will win. Fewer people = more chance that bad people will win.

Republic = “refine & enlarge” the public views (representation)

More citizens per rep.

More different factions

Harder for bad people to win by bribery

Page 41: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Advantage of a well-constructed union:Break & control the violence of FACTION

Remove causes Control effects

Destroy liberty

Worse than the disease

Give everyone the same opinions

Impracticable

Minority faction

No problem

Majorityfaction

PROBLEM: need to secure public good & private rights. HOW?

DEMOCRACY? No. (Why not?)

REPUBLIC?Yes! (Why?)

Small republic?

Large republic?

NO. Fewer factions = more chance that one will win. Fewer people = more chance that bad people will win.

Republic = “refine & enlarge” the public views (representation)

More citizens per rep.

More different factions

Harder for bad people to win by bribery

Harder for any faction to win a national majority

Page 42: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Advantage of a well-constructed union:Break & control the violence of FACTION

Remove causes Control effects

Destroy liberty

Worse than the disease

Give everyone the same opinions

Impracticable

Minority faction

No problem

Majorityfaction

PROBLEM: need to secure public good & private rights. HOW?

DEMOCRACY? No. (Why not?)

REPUBLIC?Yes! (Why?)

Small republic?

Large republic?

NO. Fewer factions = more chance that one will win. Fewer people = more chance that bad people will win.

Republic = “refine & enlarge” the public views (representation)

More citizens per rep.

More different factions

Harder for bad people to win by bribery

Harder for any faction to win a national majority

bad reps. won’t win a national majority

Page 43: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Advantage of a well-constructed union:Break & control the violence of FACTION

Remove causes Control effects

Destroy liberty

Worse than the disease

Give everyone the same opinions

Impracticable

Minority faction

No problem

Majorityfaction

PROBLEM: need to secure public good & private rights. HOW?

DEMOCRACY? No. (Why not?)

REPUBLIC?Yes! (Why?)

Small republic?

Large republic?

NO. Fewer factions = more chance that one will win. Fewer people = more chance that bad people will win.

Republic = “refine & enlarge” the public views (representation)

More citizens per rep.

More different factions

Harder for bad people to win by bribery

Harder for any faction to win a national majority

bad reps. won’t win a national majority

Large republic = good!

Page 44: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Concluding questions

A. What were the key disagreements between Anti-Federalists (such as Brutus) and Federalists (such as Madison)?

Page 45: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT OCTOBER 2011 Debating the Constitution Anti-Federalists vs. Federalists, 1787-1788

Concluding questions

A. What were the key disagreements between Anti-Federalists (such as Brutus) and Federalists (such as Madison)?

B. Do we see elements of these disagreements today?