federalists and anti-federalists

15
Federalists and Anti-Federalists What’s the difference?

Upload: warren-huber

Post on 31-Dec-2015

26 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Federalists and Anti-Federalists. What’s the difference?. Enter the Time Machine. The year is 1787 The Revolutionary War is over, and the United States of America is now on its own to decide how to rule itself Being a new country isn’t easy: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Federalists and Anti-Federalists

Federalists and Anti-Federalists

What’s the difference?

Page 2: Federalists and Anti-Federalists

Enter the Time Machine

The year is 1787 The Revolutionary War is over, and the

United States of America is now on its own to decide how to rule itself

Being a new country isn’t easy: The states disagree about what kind of

government they want The framers disagree about what kind of

government they want People are becoming frustrated and rebelling

against the current government

Page 3: Federalists and Anti-Federalists

Enter the Constitution At the Constitutional Convention,

representatives from each state (except Rhode Island) begin to write a list of rules to replace the weak Articles of Confederation

Most delegates want a strong national government

However, they also wanted to have strong local governments

After much debate, the Constitution was finally signed in September 1787

It was then sent to the states to be approved

Page 4: Federalists and Anti-Federalists

Enter the Anti-Federalists Some framers thought the Constitution

gave the government too much power Congress held too much power, given in the

“necessary and proper clause” The executive branch held too much power and

could easily become a king They argued that states should have more

power because they were closer to the people…what could a national government possibly know about state and city problems?

Elbridge Gerry - Antifederalist

Page 5: Federalists and Anti-Federalists

Enter the Anti-Federalists

Also, there was no Bill of Rights How could they ensure that the national

gov’t wasn’t going to take away personal freedoms?

This point was the focus of the Anti-Federalists campaign against ratification of the Constitution

Page 6: Federalists and Anti-Federalists

Patrick Henry, Anti-Federalist“The necessity of a Bill of Rights appears to me

to be greater in this government than ever it was in any government before…All rights not expressed an unequivocally reserved to the people are implied and incidentally relinquished to the rulers…If you intend to reserve your unalienable rights, you must have the most express stipulation; for…if the people do not think it necessary to reserve them, they will supposed to be given up”

Page 7: Federalists and Anti-Federalists

So…Do You Agree?

What do you think… Is the national government too big? Do we really need a Bill of Rights? What’s better for the people – a strong

national government or a strong state government?

Page 8: Federalists and Anti-Federalists

Enter the Federalists

The Federalists supported the Constitution as it was

The Constitution had a strong sense of CHECKS AND BALANCES, or a balance of power between the three branches of the national government and the local and state governments

Page 9: Federalists and Anti-Federalists

Enter the Federalists

They also argued that by listing specific rights the gov’t might be able to violate others that were left off Why list some if you can’t list them all?

Page 10: Federalists and Anti-Federalists

The Federalist Papers The Federalists wrote the

“Federalist Papers” to encourage states to approve the Constitution

They argued that without a strong nat’l gov’t the country would fall into anarchy

Also claimed that because 8 states already had Bills of Rights in their state constitutions then there was no need to add another

Page 11: Federalists and Anti-Federalists

So…Do You Agree?

What do you think… Does the national government work fine

the way it is? Do we really need a Bill of Rights if

everything is so well done in the Constitution?

Page 12: Federalists and Anti-Federalists

Enter the “Fight”

The Constitution needed 9 of the 13 states to approve it in order for it to become law

Both sides (the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists) tried to convince people their side was correct

After great debate, the states finally ratified the Constitution…only if there was a Bill of Rights

Page 13: Federalists and Anti-Federalists

Enter the Bill of Rights While Federalists didn’t think it was really

necessary, they agreed to add a Bill of Rights so that both sides would be happy

The rights would be added as amendments…meaning they were seen as “official changes, corrections, or additions”

The Bill of Rights were based upon the constitutions developed by the states

There were a total of ten amendments added…and they became known as “The Bill of Rights”

Page 14: Federalists and Anti-Federalists

Who Was Right?

Which side had the best argument…the Federalists or the Anti-Federalists?

Why? Does the Constitution really need a

Bill of Rights? Why or why not? If you were alive back in 1787, how

would you vote?

Page 15: Federalists and Anti-Federalists

Assignment

In partners, create a two-sided poster. On one side, create an advertisement for the Federalist position. On the other side, create an advertisement for the Anti-Federalist position. You must include at least two arguments made by each side. Use the following resources as needed: