new sample prep and data analysis 012908[1] - agilent · technique for pesticide residue analysis...
TRANSCRIPT
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
New Sample Preparation and Data
Analysis for Analyzing Hundreds of Pesticides
in Foods
E. Blanke, S. Bracht, P. FürstChemical and Veterinary ControlLaboratoryD – 48147 Münster, Germany
Chin-Kai (Kai) Meng, Ph.D. Agilent TechnologiesWilmington, DE 19808, USA
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
Chemical and Veterinary Control LaboratoryOverview
Governmental institution of the federal state, North Rhine-Westphalia Central official laboratory for inspecting:
Food of animal and plant origin, wine, tobacco
Commodities, materials with food contact
Cosmetics
Toys
Diagnosis of animal diseases and epizootics
>160 personnels (32 scientists)
Accreditated under ISO/DIN/EN 17025
Around 700 validated methods
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
Samples Analyzed Yearly
• 8,500 food samples (including cosmetics)
• 25,000 meat samples (3 plate inhibition screening tests for antibiotics)
• 250,000 blood samples from food producing animals (for animal diseases)
• 30,000 cerebric samples for BSE
• 1,500 feed samples
• 400 samples for radioactivity
• 800 samples (food/feed) for pesticides
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
Sample Prep Method Used Previously
DFG S 19
• sample weight: 100 g• extraction with acetone/water• liquid – liquid partitioning with cyclohexane/ethyl acetate• Gel permeation chromatography (GPC)
Clean up with silica gel GC/MS; GC/NPD
GC-ECD
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
Sample Prep Method Used Previously
DFG S 19
☺ multi-residue method(more than 300 pesticides)
☺ sensitive (4 g sample/mL)
☺ applicable for multitude of matrices
labor- and time- consuming
high solvent consumption
several GC runs (>10) required for each sample
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
extraction
clean-up QuEChERS method
QuickEasyCheapEffectiveRuggedSafe
GC-MSLC-MS/MS
QuEChERS - Multi-class, Multi-residue Approach
A Low Cost, Highly Effective Sample Preparation Technique for Pesticide Residue Analysis
M. Anastassiades et al., 2003, J. AOAC Int, 86:412–431.
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
QuEChERS OverviewSamples are milled in frozen state (dry ice is added) to get the best
recovery. Extraction is done in acetonitrile buffered at pH 5 – 5.5. After centrifuged, the organic phase is cleaned-up by dispersive SPE using PSA (and GCB as necessary). Additional MgSO4 is added to remove any residual water. The PSA treated extract is acidified with formic acid to improve the stability of base-sensitive pesticides. The extract is ready for GC and LC analysis.
For samples with low water content (<80%), water is added before the initial extraction to get a total of ca. 10 mL water.
Quality control is performed by adding ISTD to the acetonitrileextraction step.
PSA: primary secondary amine GCB: graphitized carbon black
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
Sample Requirement
Sample size: 1 – 2 kg (representative sample)
Cutting sample into suitable size (2 cm x 2 cm) for milling
Put cut samples in a polyethylene bag, seal the bag and freeze (@ -18 oC) overnight prior to cryogenic milling
Store flat in freezer
Seal the bag
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
Sample Preparation (Strawberry) - cryogenic milling
Initial milling without dry ice
Add dry ice, continue milling
Stir while milling
Gradually increase milling speed
Frozen sample
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
QuEChERS Uses Less Glassware
QuEChERS
Courtesy of Dr. Jon Wong, FDA, College Park, Maryland
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
A batch of A batch of 66--12 extracts12 extracts can be prepared can be prepared inin 3030--40 min40 min by a by a single analystsingle analyst with with ≈≈$1$1--33 of disposable materials per sample and of disposable materials per sample and generate generate <12 mL solvent waste<12 mL solvent waste and only a and only a rere--usable itemusable item (FEP tube) for cleaning.(FEP tube) for cleaning.
Consistently high recoveries (mostly 90Consistently high recoveries (mostly 90--110% with RSDs < 5%) of a wide range of 110% with RSDs < 5%) of a wide range of GCGC-- and LCand LC--amenable pesticides are amenable pesticides are achieved from many matrices. achieved from many matrices.
QuEChERS Advantages
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
229 pesticides analyzed by GC-MS and LC-MS-MS
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
<20 20-49 50-69 70-79 80-89 90-110 111-120 >120
%Recovery
Perc
enta
ge o
f Pes
ticid
es
10 ng/g Lettuce10 ng/g Orange25 ng/g Orange50 ng/g Lettuce100 ng/g Lettuce100 ng/g Orange
Recoveries in the QuEChERS method
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
Dispersive SPE Comparable to Cartridge SPE
Courtesy of Dr. Frank Schenck, FDA, Atlanta Georgia
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
inter-laboratory validation of the “buffered” QuEChERS method
13 labs in 7 countries (USA, Canada, Denmark, Germany, The Netherlands, Spain, and UK)
21 fortified samples (at 10 - 1,000 ng/g at 3 paired levels) with 20 diverse pesticides plus 6 incurred pesticides in 3 commodities (grape, lettuce, and orange)
analysis by (LVI-)GC/MS and LC/MS-MS
QuEChERS Collaborative Study
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
New Pesticide Analysis Method
QuEChERS☺ Multi-residue method
☺ fast sample preparation
☺ low solvent consumption
low final sample concentration (1 g/mL)
normally several analytical runs (in SIM) necessary
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
Sample Analysis Objective
Multi-residue and data analysis for 927pesticides with one GC/MS injection
• injection of 10 µL
• simultaneous SIM/Scan data acquisition
• data analysis with spectra deconvolution (AMDIS)
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
System Configuration
• 7890GC / 5975 inert MSD, Retention Time locked
• PTV injection port
• 30 m x 0.25 mm x 0.25 µm HP-5MS column
• Synchronous SIM/Scan acquisition
• Deconvolution Reporting Software, DRS (G1716AA)
• RT locked DRS Pesticide Library (927 compounds)
(G1672AA)
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
What is Deconvolution?“…in the broad sense of extracting one signal from a complex mixture...” (From AMDIS)
There are four deconvoluted components under the white TIC.
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
AMDIS
Automatic Mass spectral Deconvolution andIdentification System
• Developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
• Developed to detect chemicals in violationof Chemical Weapons Convention (mustminimize false positives and false negativesin reporting)
• Used to identify target compounds incomplex matrices
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
50
170 280
50170280
31075
75
185
185
310
160
160
Eliminate Ions Don’t Fit the Criteria
Extracted Ion Chromatograms
(EIC)
Ion grouping criteria:
1. Same RetTime at apex
2. Same peak width
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
50
170 280
50170280
Spectrum is Deconvoluted/Cleaned
Related ions are grouped together as
a component.
A component in AMDIS
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Ion 41
Ion 42
Ion 43
Ion 154
Ion 98
Ion 55
Ion 56
Ion 57
Ion 99
Ion 116
Ion 131
Ion 248
Deconvolve EICs (after de-skewing) of a Pear Extract
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
Extract All “Components” from EICs
11.20 11.40 11.60 11.80 12.00 12.20 12.40 12.60 12.80 13.00 13.20 13.40
No,
Ions not related
Yes,
Ions are related
Ion grouping criteria:
1. Same RetTime at apex
2. Same peak width
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
AMDIS Deconvolution Pulls Out Individual Components and their Spectra
TIC & Spectrum
TIC Sum of ions in Component 1
Sum of ions in Component 3
Sum of ions in Component 2
Deconvolution
Deconvoluted peaks and spectra
Search “cleaned” components against a library for hits.
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
Carbaryl
PeachScan at 5.615 min
Deconvoluted/extracted spectrum
Library spectrum
The power of deconvolution is appreciated while comparing the top two spectra (raw scan and the compound spectrum hidden in the raw scan).
A component in the scan above.
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
Fenbuconazole
PeachScan at 10.776 min
Deconvoluted/extracted spectrum
Library spectrum
A component in the scan above.
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
Endosulfan, alpha
Scan at 7.538 min
Deconvoluted/extracted spectrum
Library spectrum
Peach
A component in the scan above.
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
Fast GC and 3-Way Splitter System(Sample prepared using QuEChERS protocol at US FDA)
• Agilent application simultaneously collected GC and MS signals (RT locked) using a 3-way splitter. The location (RT) of the GC peaks from µECD and FPD (P) helped to confirm the targets found by AMDIS (deconvolution).
• Each GC run is at the 3x speed using a 240V oven. With deconvolution, less peak resolution is required. Each run is finished in less than 15 minutes.
FDA uses 4 injections (FPD + SIM, ELCD + SIM), 50 minutes each, for multi-residue analysis
Application Note 5989-7670EN: Replacing Multiple 50-Minute GC and GC-MS/SIM Analyses with One 15-Minute Full-Scan GC-MS Analysis for Non-targeted Pesticides Screening and >10x Productivity Gain
2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00
5000000
1e+07
1.5e+07
2e+07
2.5e+07
3e+07
3.5e+071.838
2.703
3.519
3.932
4.696
5.640 6.6807.093
7.556
9.081
9.538
10.559 12.382
Endosulfan (alpha)
Tetrachloro-m-xylene
Captan
Phosmet
Carbaryl
µECD
2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00
1000000
2000000
3000000
4000000
50000003.641
4.773
9.358
9.523
9.826
9.91011.066
Tributyl phosphate Phosmet
FPD (P)
TIC
Peach
2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00200000
600000
1000000
1400000
1800000
2200000
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
DRS Report from a SIM data file – for Additional Confirmation (4 ions for each target compound)
Full-scan Deconvolution vs. FPD/ELCD/SIM
21 ± 614 ± 2Endosulfan sulfateEndosulfan sulfate47 ± 534 ± 4Endosulfan (beta)Endosulfan (beta)26 ± 416 ± 2Endosulfan (alpha)Endosulfan (alpha)
153 ± 47205 ± 10ChlorothalonilChlorothalonilTomatoFenbuconazolePyridaben
230 ± 23320 ± 37PhosmetPhosmetPropiconazole I and IIEndosulfan (alpha)CaptanCarbarylPeachAzoxystrobinChlorthal-dimethyl
25 ± 2 ppb25 ± 3 ppbDiazinonDiazinonGinsengGC-MS/SIMGC-FPDFDA (FPD,ELCD,SIM)Agilent DRS (full scan/TID)
1 15-min injection (splitter) found these
4 50-min injections found these
FDA quant results
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
Can We Quant on Deconvoluted Ions?
• YES!
• MSD ChemStation Rev. E.02
• DRS A.04
Software Demo
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
Summary
QuEChERS - Analyses of real samples had same results as earlier (labor- and time- consuming) sample prep protocol
GC/MS in synchronous SIM/Scan mode combined with GC detectors and deconvolution reporting software (DRS) enables pesticide residue analysis at 10 µg/kg (ppb) and below in various food commodities from one injection
Quantitiation on the deconvoluted (cleaned) ions provides more accurate results
Data analysis time was about 15 min for each sample (screen and semi-quant 927 pesticides)
QuEChERS+DRS is a fast and comprehensive multi-residuepesticide analysis methodology.
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
Questions?
Application Note 5989-7670EN: Replacing Multiple 50-Minute GC and GC-MS/SIM Analyses with One 15-Minute Full-Scan GC-MS Analysis for Non-targeted Pesticides Screening and >10x Productivity Gain
e-seminar
January 29, 2008
Thank you for attending Agilent Technologies’e-Seminar today.
For a full listing of our e-Seminar offerings as well as our hands-on training classes, please go
to our website at: www.agilent.com/chem/education
Or register for
to receive regular updates
Stay currentwith e‐notes