neil b. cohen jeffrey d. forchelli professor of law brooklyn law school
TRANSCRIPT
Neil B. CohenJeffrey D. Forchelli Professor of Law
Brooklyn Law School
Not a restatement of current law, but a guide to reform
Goals are economic in nature – facilitate use of movable property, both tangible and intangible, as collateral so as to facilitate increased access to credit at lower cost
Security rights in all types of movable property, both tangible and intangible
Limited exclusions
Recommendation 4(b)
Also governs sales of receivables
Functional approach – substance over form
General rules applying to all types of transactions creating security rights in all types of assets
Adjustments for particular types of asset and for particular types of transactions such as acquisition finance (e.g., purchase-money security rights/r.o.t.)
Created by agreement Writing required unless security right is
possessory (actual physical possession only, no constructive possession)
Security right may secure future obligations Security right may encumber after-acquired
assets Limited effectiveness of certain anti-
assignment clauses in receivables Automatic security right in proceeds
Several methods available Registration of notice (not recordation of
security agreement) Actual possession of tangible assets “Control” of bank account Notation on certificate of title or registration
in specialized registry
Primary method of third-party effectiveness Minimal information required
◦ Identifier (name) of grantor and secured creditor◦ Description of encumbered assets◦ Duration and maximum amount secured, if
applicable Indexed by grantor identifier Minimal fees – only enough to recover costs
of operation
Other secured parties◦ General rule: first to register or become effective
against third parties◦ Special “superpriority” rule for acquisition finance
Judgment creditors
Transferees of the collateral
Distinguish from enforcement of underlying rights, such as enforcement of an intellectual property right against an infringer or enforcement of receivable against debtor on the receivable
Judicial and non-judicial enforcement allowed
Basic concept of commercial reasonableness for non-judicial disposition
For tangible assets, most issues governed by law of the State in which asset is located
For intangible assets, most issues governed by law of the State in which grantor is located
Adjustments for security rights in intellectual property?