nasbite international conference march 30th, 2017 chris ......apr 09, 2017 · myle duong, global...
TRANSCRIPT
-
NASBITE International ConferenceMarch 30th, 2017Chris Schrage, CGBPMyle Duong, Global Marketing
-
- 2 -
-
- 3 -
" Culture is more often a source of conflict than of synergy. Cultural differences are a nuisance at best and often a disaster."
Dr. Geert Hofstede,
Emeritus Professor,
Maastricht University
-
The motivation to understand other cultures is more than just a touch-
feely, lofty ideal.
It’s directly tied to the bottom line.
David Livermore, PH.D.
-
- 5 -
The basis of Cultural Intelligence
Academic Intelligence
(IQ)
Non-Academic Intelligence
Emotional (EQ)
Social Practical
Cultural Intelligence
(CQ)
-
- 6 -
Aspects of Cultural Intelligence
Drive
• Interest, confidence, and drive to adapt cross-culturally
Knowledge
• Understanding intercultural norms and differences
Strategy
• Making sense of culturally diverse experiences and planning accordingly
Action
Changing verbal and nonverbal actions appropriately when interacting cross-culturally
-
- 7 -
Cultural Intelligence Assessment
Speech Acts
Verbal
Non-Verbal
Action
Planning
Awareness
Checking
Strategy
Business
Values& Norms
Socio-Linguistic
Leadership
Knowledge
Intrinsic interest
Extrinsic interest
Self-efficacy
Drive
-
- 8 -
RESULTS OF HIGH CQ
Profitability
Job Performance
Cross-Cultural AdjustmentPersonal
Well-Being
© 2015 Cultural Intelligence Center
-
- 9 -
From low to high CQ
React to External Stimuli
Recognize
Other Cultural Norms Motivated to learn more
Accommodate other Cultural Norms into your thinking
Adjust to other Cultural Norms into your behavior
Automatically adjusting
Thinking and Behavior when
getting appropriate cues
-
- 10 -
Strategies to Enhance CQ Drive
Face Biases
Count the cost of Cultural Mishaps
Hands-on Experiences
-
- 11 -
Strategies to Enhance CQ Knowledge
Know yourself and personal culture.
When reading ad copy, ask if this is shaped by culture?
Find a culture coach or broker
-
- 12 -
Strategies to Enhance CQ Strategy
NOTICE. Don’t Judge
Plan your encounter
Reflect afterward
-
- 13 -
Strategies to Enhance CQ Action
Observe and Record
Variations in verbal and nonverbal behavior
Practice New Behaviors
Adapt how your give
instructions, foster
interaction and provide
feedback
-
- 14 -
Worldwide Norms
LOW MODERATE HIGH
© 2015 Cultural Intelligence Center
25% 50% 25%
-
- 15 -
CQ Profile Summary
© 2015 Cultural Intelligence Center
-
- 16 -
Assessment Format
Rating Scale
• Compared to my peers, I am sure I can handle the stress of interacting with people from cultures that are new to me
• Given a choice, I prefer working with people from different cultural backgrounds
Multiple Choice
• In culturally diverse situations, do you rely primarily on your
• Cultural knowledge or Technical knowledge?
-
- 17 -
Study Abroad Statistics
Source: Institute of International Education
-
- 18 -
Gains from studying abroad
Foreign Language skills
Cross cultural communication skills
Experience working with diverse team members
Knowledge of chosen career field
Abilities to adapt to new environments and handling difficult situations
Source: Gilman Scholarship Internship Evaluation Survey, 2016
-
- 19 -
Selection Criteria for Global Companies
Intellectual Skills
Motivation
Interpersonal Skills
CQ Knowledge
CQ Drive
CQ Action
-
- 20 -
Demographics
-
- 21 -
Hypothesis 1There is significant increase in all categories of CQ Intelligence from studying abroad.
Significant at the .01 level
MeanStandard Deviation
TSignificance
Level
CQ Drive Pre 77.985 12.754-3.381 .001
CQ Drive Post 83.246 14.194
CQ Knowledge Pre 45.062 16.980-7.231 .000
CQ Knowledge Post 60.508 16.260
CQ Strategy Pre 71.646 14.104-4.979 .000
CQ Strategy Post 80.477 11.869
CQ Action Pre 62723 17.889-4.687 .000
CQ Action Post 72.446 15.535
Key takeaway:
CQ scores increase significantly from studying abroad
-
- 22 -
Hypothesis 2
Significant at the .05 level
Long term programs increase CQ Intelligence more than Short term programs.
Duration MeanStandard Deviation
TSignificance
LevelCQ Drive
PostShort 82.556 15.032
-.867 .389Long 86.636 8.755
CQ Knowledge
Post
Short 58.826 16.947-2.542 .018
Long 68.273 9.498
CQ Strategy
Post
Short 80.870 12.016.589 .558
Long 78.546 11.457
CQ Action Post
Short 72.556 16.193.125 .901
Long 71.909 12.430
Key takeaway:
Long term programs increase CQ Knowledge significantly
more than Short term programs
-
- 23 -
Hypothesis 3Traveling to countries where English is not the first language improves one’s Socio-linguistic score.
Country Language
MeanStandard Deviation
T Significance
Level
Sociolinguistic Pre Scores
English 20.181 20.831-.208 .836
Non-English 21.648 21.423
Sociolinguistic Post Scores
English 34.818 29.832-.140 .889
Non-English 36.167 38.988
Key takeaway:
For the sample tested, Sociolinguistic scores remained
the same between English and Non-English speaking
countries
-
- 24 -
Hypothesis 4Males and females show statistically different results in Post CQ scores.
Gender MeanStandard Deviation
TSignificance
Level
CQ Drive PostMale 83.294 13.591
.016 .987Female 83.229 14.541
CQ Knowledge Post
Male 62.529 14.000.594 .555
Female 59.791 17.068
CQ Strategy Post
Male 78.353 11.472-.857 .395
Female 81.229 12.032
CQ Action Post
Male 71.647 16.209-.245 .807
Female 72.729 15.456
Key takeaway:
Males and females learn equally from studying abroad
-
- 25 -
Hypothesis 5Culture intensive programs have a higher impact on post CQ scores than regular study abroad programs.
Significant at the .05 level
Program Cultural Intensity
MeanStandard Deviation
TSignificance
Level
CQ Drive PostCulture 86.393 11.908
1.573 .121Educational 80.865 15.437
CQ Knowledge Post
Culture 61.429 18.283.395 .694
Educational 59.811 14.772CQ Strategy
PostCulture 77.143 44.528
1.909 .061Educational 68.892 11.706
CQ Action Post
Culture 77.143 13.1962.182 .033
Educational 68.889 16.381
Key takeaway:
Participants of culture intensive programs are able to
strongly adapt appropriately to cross-cultural situations.
-
- 26 -
Summary of Hypotheses and Results
Fully SupportedH1
• There is significant increase in all categories of CQ from studying abroad.
Partially SupportedH2
• Long term programs increase CQ Knowledge significantly more than short term programs.
Failed to SupportH3
• For the sample tested, sociolinguistic levels remained unchanged when studying in English and non-English speaking countries
Failed to SupportH4
• Males and Females learn equally when studying abroad
Partially SupportedH5
• Participants of culture intensive programs are able to strongly adapt appropriately to cross cultural situations
-
- 27 -
Main Limitations
Sample Size
• 65 participants
• New study
Data
• Circumstantial differences
• Intention
-
- 28 -
Implications for Future Research
Paves way for future analysis
Evidence to benefactors
Study abroad long term value
-
- 29 -
"In today's very complicated world, it's really educational exchange that is the hope that we can find ways to work together and to understand each other better."
Peggy Blumenthal
-
谢谢شكرا
Merci
Akpe
-
Myle DuongGlobal Marketing honors student
University of Northern [email protected]
Chris Schrage, MBA, CGBGGlobal Opportunities Coordinator
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]