motivation

31
Welcome To The Presentation Of Motivation

Upload: farihaahmad

Post on 20-Jan-2015

612 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Motivation

Welcome To The Presentation Of Motivation

Page 2: Motivation

Introduction

Group Name- Pandemonium

Group Members:

Kaniz Fatima Irin------------------ID-10111101121-----Intake------23rd

Fariha Ahmad----------------------ID-10111101092-----Intake------23rd

Tarich Khalasi----------------------ID-10112101111-----Intake------24th

Monira Kazal-----------------------ID-08092101218------Intake------18th

Program-BBA

Bangladesh University of Business & Technology

Page 3: Motivation

Fariha Ahmad

ID-10111101092

Intake-23rd

Page 4: Motivation

Definition Of Motivation The term motivation has been derived from the

word “Motive”, which means the urge to do something or not to do something. Motivation is to give reason, incentive, enthusiasm, or interest that causes a specific action or certain behavior. Motivation is present in every life function. Simple acts such as eating is motivated by hunger. Education is motivated by desire for knowledge. There are two main kinds of motivation: intrinsic and extrinsic. Intrinsic motivation is internal. It occurs when people are compelled to do something out of pleasure, importance, or desire. Extrinsic motivation occurs when external factors compel the person to do something.

Page 5: Motivation

Kinds And Examples Of Motivation

• Examples of Intrinsic MotivationWriting short stories because a writer really enjoys writing them, reading a nonfiction book because the reader is curious about the topic, and playing chess because the player enjoys effortful thinking are some intrinsic motivation examples.

• Examples of Extrinsic MotivationThere are many possible extrinsic motivation examples.  The writer who only writes poems to be submitted to poetry contests would be one example of extrinsic motivation. The person who dislikes sales but accepts a sales position because he or she desires to earn an above average salary is another example of extrinsic motivation.  

Page 6: Motivation

Difference Between Motivation And Satisfaction

Motivation and satisfaction are concepts that are much talked about in an organizational setup. These are important tools in the hands of management to achieve the goals of an organization in a better manner.

Motivation refers to any stimulus that controls and guides human behavior. In an organizational setup, motivation could be anything from incentives, perks, promotion and even encouragement from the boss on completion of a given task.

Satisfaction refers to a feeling that people have when they have completed a job that is considered difficult. In fact, having done the job well is what brings satisfaction to most people. The pleasure or joy of doing a job is what is called as job satisfaction.

Page 7: Motivation

Difference Between Motivation And Satisfaction

• Motivation is what is believed to be behind the behavior or employees. It also regulates the performance levels.

• Satisfaction is joy or pleasure of working and it is the sense of accomplishment after having done a job in a flawless manner.

• Motivation can be extrinsic as well as intrinsic. While salary, promotion, incentives, perks and rewards are examples of extrinsic motivation, job satisfaction is a type of intrinsic motivation

• People continue with their jobs even when they have no job satisfaction as long as there is motivation in the form of good salary and perks.

Page 8: Motivation

Hierarchy Of Needs TheoryIt was in 1943 a Psychologist Mr. Abraham Harold Maslow suggested his Theory of Human Motivation.The Maslow's Pyramid of Human Needs is explained below :-

1.Physiological Needs : Physiological needs are the basic needs for sustaining human life. These needs include food, shelter, clothing, rest, air, water, sleep. These basic human needs lie at the lowest level in the hierarchy of needs as they have priority over all other needs.

2. Security / Safety Needs : These are the needs connected with the psychological fear of loss of job, property, natural calamities or hazards, etc. An employee wants protection from such types of fear.

Page 9: Motivation

Hierarchy Of Needs Theory 3. Social Needs : An employee is a human being is rightly treated as a

social animal. He desires to stay in group. He feels that he should belong to one or the other group and the member of the group should accept him with love and affection.

4. Esteem Needs : This category of needs include the need to be respected by others, need to be appreciated by others, need to have power and finally prestigious position. Once the previous needs are satisfied, a person feels to be held in esteem both by himself and also by others.

5. Self-actualisation Needs : Here, a person feels that he should accomplish something in his life. He wants to utilize his potentials to the maximum extent and desires to become what one is capable of becoming. A person desires to have challenges and achieves something special in his life or in the area of his specialization.

Page 10: Motivation

ERG TheoryClayton P. Alderfer's ERG theory from 1969 condenses Maslow's five human needs into three categories: Existence, Relatedness and Growth.

Page 11: Motivation

ERG Theory

• Existence NeedsInclude all material and physiological desires (e.g., food, water, air, clothing, safety, physical love and affection).

• Relatedness NeedsEncompass social and external esteem; relationships with significant others like family, friends, co-workers and employers . This also means to be recognized and feel secure as part of a group or family.

• Growth NeedsInternal esteem and self actualization; these impel a person to make creative or productive effects on himself and the environment (e.g., to progress toward one's ideal self). This includes desires to be creative and productive, and to complete meaningful tasks.

Page 12: Motivation

Theory X And Theory Y In his 1960 book, The Human Side of Enterprise, Douglas McGregor proposed two

theories by which to view employee motivation. He avoided descriptive labels and simply called the theories Theory X and Theory Y.

Page 13: Motivation

Theory X And Theory Y Theory X assumes that the average person:

• Dislikes work and attempts to avoid it.

• Has no ambition, wants no responsibility, and would rather follow than lead.

• Is self-centered and therefore does not care about organizational goals.

• Resists change.

• Is gullible and not particularly intelligent.

• Essentially, Theory X assumes that people work only for money and security.

• Theory Y makes the following general assumptions:

• Work can be as natural as play and rest.

• People will be self-directed to meet their work objectives if they are committed to them.

• People will be committed to their objectives if rewards are in place that address higher needs such as self-fulfillment.

• Under these conditions, people will seek responsibility.

• Most people can handle responsibility because creativity and ingenuity are common in the population.

Page 14: Motivation

Kaniz Fatima Irin

ID-10111101121

Intake-23rd

Page 15: Motivation

Two-Factor Theory

In 1959, Frederick Herzberg, a behavioral scientist proposed a two-factor theory or the motivator-hygiene theory. According to Herzberg, there are some job factors that result in satisfaction while there are other job factors that prevent dissatisfaction. According to Herzberg, the opposite of “Satisfaction” is “No satisfaction” and the opposite of “Dissatisfaction” is “No Dissatisfaction”.

Hygiene factors- Hygiene factors are those job factors which are essential for existence of motivation at workplace. These do not lead to positive satisfaction for long-term. But if these factors are absent / if these factors are non-existant at workplace, then they lead to dissatisfaction. In other words, hygiene factors are those factors which when adequate / reasonable in a job, pacify the employees and do not make them dissatisfied.

Page 16: Motivation

Two-Factor Theory Motivational factors- According

to Herzberg, the hygiene factors cannot be regarded as motivators. The motivational factors yield positive satisfaction. These factors are inherent to work. These factors motivate the employees for a superior performance. They are called satisfiers. These are factors involved in performing the job.

Examples of Hygiene factors and Motivational factors are shown on the right side of this slide.

Page 17: Motivation

McClelland’s Theory Of Needs In his acquired-needs theory, David McClelland proposed that an individual's

specific needs are acquired over time and are shaped by one's life experiences. Most of these needs can be classed as either achievement, affiliation, or power.

The need for achievement (n-ach)

The n-ach person is 'achievement motivated' and therefore seeks achievement, attainment of realistic but challenging goals, and advancement in the job.

The need for authority and power (n-pow)

The n-pow person is 'authority motivated'. This driver produces a need to be influential, effective and to make an impact. their ideas to prevail. There is also motivation and need towards increasing personal status and prestige.

The need for affiliation (n-affil)

The n-affil person is 'affiliation motivated', and has a need for friendly relationships and is motivated towards interaction with other people. The affiliation driver produces motivation and need to be liked and held in popular regard. These people are team players.

Page 18: Motivation

Cognitive Evaluation Theory

A theory dealing with the effect of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. It assumes that intrinsically motivated behavior is affected by a person's innate need to feel competent and self-determining in dealing with the environment. The theory asserts that there are two main ways extrinsic rewards affect intrinsic motivation. First, the reward may have a controlling affect by being perceived as the primary reason for participating in an activity. Secondly, a reward may have an informational aspect, which affects the recipient's opinion of his or her own competence. Most rewards have a controlling aspect and an informational aspect. The combined effects may either increase or decrease an individual's intrinsic motivation. Rewards that have mainly a controlling aspect tend to decrease intrinsic motivation.

Page 19: Motivation

Goal-Setting Theory

The famous goal setting theory was put forward by Dr Edwin Locke in the late 1960s. It is widely recognized as the most valid and useful motivation theories. Today, we all use it and set our goals. Not only company and organizations use it, we use it in our lives too.

1. Goals should be specific

Goals such as "Become a top sales" or "Sell as many products as I can" are too vague and therefore have no effect on motivation. Instead, one should set more specific goals. Specific means quantitative. For example, one may set a goal such as "sell 500 products per month". This is a specific target. If one uses the specific result as a source of motivation and she/he will perform better.

Page 20: Motivation

Goal-Setting Theory 2. Goals Should Be Challenging

Make each goal a challenge . If the goal can be easily achieved, without difficulty, it is not very motivational. Hard goals are more motivating than easy goals, because when a goal is challenging, a will try best and generate enough enthusiasm to get it done. When the goal has been accomplished, the person will feel very happy and will get high rewards too.

3. Goals should be achievable

Goals can't be unattainable, of course. If the goals are not realistic to achieve, people may lose confidence in the end. So when goal is set, people have to make sure that they can achieve it. The goal should be challenging and difficult, and people should believe that they can achieve it too. When developing goals, people have to make sure the goals are not only specific, challenging, and achievable, but also are measurable and have a target date for attainment.

Page 21: Motivation

Tarich Khalasi

ID-10112101111

Intake-24th

Page 22: Motivation

Self-Efficacy Theory The concept of self-efficacy lies at the center of psychologist Albert Bandura’s

social cognitive theory. According to Albert Bandura, self-efficacy is "the belief in one’s capabilities to organize and execute the courses of action required to manage prospective situations.“

The Role of Self-Efficacy:

Bandura and others have found that an individual’s self-efficacy plays a major role in how goals, tasks, and challenges are approached.

People with a strong sense of self-efficacy:

View challenging problems as tasks to be mastered

Develop deeper interest in the activities in which they participate

Form a stronger sense of commitment to their interests and activities

Recover quickly from setbacks and disappointments

People with a weak sense of self-efficacy:

Avoid challenging tasks

Believe that difficult tasks and situations are beyond their capabilities

Focus on personal failings and negative outcomes and quickly lose confidence in personal abilities.

Page 23: Motivation

Self-Efficacy Theory

Sources of Self-Efficacy:

1. Mastery Experiences:

Performing a task successfully strengthens our sense of self-efficacy. However, failing to adequately deal with a task or challenge can undermine and weaken self-efficacy.

2. Social Modeling:

Witnessing other people successfully completing a task is another important source of self-efficacy, which is called social modeling.

3. Social Persuasion:

Getting verbal encouragement from others helps people overcome self-doubt and instead focus on giving their best effort to the task at hand.

Page 24: Motivation

Reinforcement Theory

Reinforcement theory of motivation was proposed by BF Skinner and his associates. It states that individual’s behavior is a function of its consequences. It is based on “law of effect”, i.e., individual’s behavior with positive consequences tends to be repeated, but individual’s behavior with negative consequences tends not to be repeated.

Reinforcement theory of motivation overlooks the internal state of individual, i.e., the inner feelings and drives of individuals are ignored by Skinner. This theory focuses totally on what happens to an individual when he takes some action. Thus, according to Skinner, the external environment of the organization must be designed effectively and positively so as to motivate the employee. This theory is a strong tool for analyzing controlling mechanism for individual’s behavior. However, it does not focus on the causes of individual’s behavior.

Page 25: Motivation

Reinforcement Theory

The managers use the following methods for controlling the behavior of the employees:

Positive Reinforcement- This implies giving a positive response when an individual shows positive and required behavior. For example - Immediately praising an employee for coming early for job. This will increase probability of outstanding behavior occurring again.

Negative Reinforcement- This implies rewarding an employee by removing negative / undesirable consequences.

Punishment- It implies removing positive consequences so as to lower the probability of repeating undesirable behavior in future. In other words, punishment means applying undesirable consequence for showing undesirable behavior.

Extinction- It implies absence of reinforcements. In other words, extinction implies lowering the probability of undesired behavior by removing reward for that kind of behavior

Page 26: Motivation

Monira Kazal

ID-08092101218

Intake-18th

Page 27: Motivation

Equity Theory Psychologist John Stacey Adams put forward his equity theory model in 1962. The

theory deals with one's own perception.

The core of the equity theory is the principle of balance or equity. As per this motivation theory, an individual’s motivation level is correlated to his perception of equity, fairness and justice practiced by the management. Higher is individual’s perception of fairness, greater is the motivation level and vice versa. While evaluating fairness, employee compares the job input (in terms of contribution) to outcome (in terms of compensation) and also compares the same with that of another peer of equal cadre/category. D/I ratio (output-input ratio) is used to make such a comparison.

This can be illustrated by the following equation:

Page 28: Motivation

Equity Theory Negative Tension state: Equity is perceived when this ratio is equal. While if this

ratio is unequal, it leads to “equity tension”. J.Stacy Adams called this a negative tension state which motivates him to do something right to relieve this tension. A comparison has been made between 2 workers A and B to understand this point.

Referents: The four comparisons an employee can make have been termed as “referents”. The referent chosen is a significant variable in equity theory. These referents are as follows:

Self-inside: An employee’s experience in a different position inside his present organization.

Self-outside: An employee’s experience in a situation outside the present organization.

Other-inside: Another employee or group of employees inside the employee’s present organization.

Other-outside: Another employee or employees outside the employee’s present organization.

Page 29: Motivation

Expectancy Theory

The expectancy theory was proposed by Victor Vroom of Yale School of Management in 1964.

The Expectancy theory states that employee’s motivation is an outcome of how much an individual wants a reward (Valence), the assessment that the likelihood that the effort will lead to expected performance (Expectancy) and the belief that the performance will lead to reward (Instrumentality). In short, Valence is the significance associated by an individual about the expected outcome. It is an expectation and not the actual satisfaction that an employee expects to receive after achieving the goals. Expectancy is the faith that better efforts will result in better performance. Expectancy is influenced by factors such as possession of appropriate skills for performing the job, availability of right resources, availability of crucial information and getting the required support for completing the job.

Page 30: Motivation

Expectancy Theory

Instrumentality is the faith that if a person performs well, then a valid outcome will be there. Instrumentality is affected by factors such as believe in the people who decide who receives what outcome, the simplicity of the process deciding who gets what outcome, and clarity of relationship between performance and outcomes. Thus, the expectancy theory concentrates on the following three relationships: Effort-performance relationship: What is the likelihood that the individual’s effort be recognized in his performance appraisal?

Performance-reward relationship: It talks about the extent to which the employee believes that getting a good performance appraisal leads to organizational rewards.

Rewards-personal goals relationship: It is all about the attractiveness or appeal of the potential reward to the individual.

Vroom was of view that employees consciously decide whether to perform or not at the job. This decision solely depended on the employee’s motivation level which in turn depends on three factors of expectancy, valence and instrumentality.

Page 31: Motivation

Thank You!