model toxics in packaging legislation
DESCRIPTION
Model Toxics in Packaging Legislation. Sharon Yergeau NH Department of Environmental Services NEWMOA Environmental Summit Providence, Rhode Island September 28, 2005. Model Toxics in Packaging Legislation. Why do we need it? Where has the law been adopted? How does it work? - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Model Toxics in Packaging Legislation
Sharon Yergeau
NH Department of Environmental Services
NEWMOA Environmental Summit
Providence, Rhode Island
September 28, 2005
Model Toxics in Packaging Legislation
• Why do we need it?
• Where has the law been adopted?
• How does it work?
• How is it administered? TPCH
Packaging supports our economy.
Containers and
Packaging32%
Nondurable Goods27%
Durable Goods16%
Food Waste11%
Yard Trimmings12%
Other2%
Source: Miller, C. 2002. “Garbage by the Numbers” NSWMA Research Bulletin 02-02, July 2002.
MSW Composition by Product
MSW Toxicity
Model Toxics in Packaging Legislation; Where has the law been adopted?
• Model legislation developed in 1989
• CONEG adopted in 1990
• Basis for legislation in 19 US states
• European Union Directive
• Asian countries
States with Legislation
Model Toxics in Packaging Legislation;How does it work?
• Restricts the use of four heavy metals: Cd (Cadmium) Cr+6 (Hexavalent chromium) Pb (Lead) Hg (Mercury)
• Agreed to through a collaborative effort by states and industry
Summary of Model Legislation;How does it work?
• Applies to packaging and packaging components
• Prohibits intentional introduction• Limits incidental presence (total
concentration by weight): 600 ppm (0.06%) 2 years after adoption250 ppm (0.025%) 3 years after adoption100 ppm (0.01%) 4 years after adoption
Compliance & Certification
• Affected industries self-certify
• Creates supply chain responsibility
• Certificates furnished upon request
• Allowance for exemptions
Supply Chain Responsibility
• Begins with sales/distribution• Request for a Certificate of Compliance for
a specific product/package• Seller/distributor asks their supplier• Primary supplier asks secondary supplier,
and so on until all the materials that have gone into the package are covered
Exemptions
• Manufactured prior to effective date
• Comply with federal health & safety
• Recycled content (post-consumer)
• No feasible alternative (but not advertising!)
• Reused and regulated by federal H&S
• Controlled distribution and reuse
• Glass/ceramic with vitrified label
How is the law administered? Toxics in Packaging Clearinghouse
TPCH supports implementation of the model.
Minimizes administrative burden for states
Coordinates exemption requests
Promotes consistency and uniformity
Information resource and Internet contact
Venue for ongoing review of Model legislation
TPCH Members
• Member States:
Connecticut, Iowa, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Minnesota, Rhode Island, Maine
• Industry AdvisorsAmerican Plastics CouncilSociety of Glass and Ceramic DecoratorsSteel Recycling Institute
Success Stories
• Wine Bottles
• Lead Soldered Cans
Recent Success Story
• Domestic Company
• Battery was fine;
• Lead solder was not.
What’s Next
EPA Source Reduction Ass’t. Grant Program • Compliance Assessment
• Source Reduction Outreach for Non-
Compliant Packaging
• Environmental Preferable Purchasing (EPP)
Outreach to Supply Chain
To join the TPCH orfor additional information:
Visit our website
www.toxicsinpackaging.org
Sharon Yergeau, NHDES
(603) 271-2918 or [email protected]
Patty Dillon, TPCH Program Manager
(802) 254-8911 or [email protected]