middle voice in*bantu · introduction • “the)middle (or medial) voice is)considered to bethe...

51
Middle voice in Bantu Sebastian Dom, Leonid Kulikov and Koen Bostoen Ghent University

Upload: others

Post on 25-Mar-2020

13 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Middle voice in  Bantu

Sebastian  Dom,  Leonid  Kulikov  and Koen  BostoenGhent University

Outline

• Introduction• Middle markers  in  Bantu• Conclusion

Introduction

Introduction

• “The  middle (ormedial)  voice is  considered to be the most  heterogeneous voice category.”  (Shibatani 2004:1149)

• “Crucially,  it is  almost impossible to discern any syntactic core of  allthe functions from the middle domain.”  (Kazenin 2001:923)• Valency-­‐decreasing:  reflexive,  reciprocal,  passive,  anticausative,  antipassive• Not obligatory in  potential constructions,  not unproblematic with logophoricmiddles,  and does  not take  place with deponents

Introduction

OUR  WORKING  DEFINITION• Middle is  voice category characterized by high  degree of  polysemy• Cluster  of  functional categories determined by crosslinguistic,  typological research  (Kemmer 1993,  Kulikov  2013)• Key semantic notion is  low  degree of  elaboration of  events (Kemmer1993)• Typically marked through verbal morphology in  Bantu languages• Semantic space centered around three basic  voice constructions:  reciprocal -­‐ reflexive -­‐ passive

Direct  Reflexive

One-­‐Participant    Events

Reciprocal

NaturalReciprocalEvents

Collective

NaturalCollectiveEvents

Grooming

ChainingEvents

Indirect  Reflexive

IndirectMiddle

LogophoricReflexive

LogophoricMiddle

Two-­‐ParticipantEvents

PassiveMiddle

Passive

EmotionMiddle

CognitionMiddle

SpontaneousAction  or  Process

PotentialPassive

Facilitative

TranslationalMotion

Non-­‐TranslationalMotion

Change  InBody  Posture

Stative

Semantic map  of  the middle domainAdaptation  of  Kemmer (1993:202)

Introduction

IMPORTANT  TYPOLOGICAL  OBSERVATIONS  REGARDING  MIDDLE  MARKING  (KEMMER  1993:20-­‐21)

• Middle marking can be lexically determined and encode syntacticprocesses (cf.  also discussion in  Arce-­‐Arenales et  al.  1993)

• Lexical classes:  body  action  middles,  sociative middles,  cognition middles,  spontaneous events• Syntactic processes:  reciprocal,  reflexive,  passive,  anticausative,  antipassive,  auto-­‐benefactive (Kulikov  2013)

Introduction

IMPORTANT  TYPOLOGICAL  OBSERVATIONS  REGARDING  MIDDLE  MARKING  (KEMMER  1993:20-­‐21)

• Idiosyncratic distribution within lexical classes

German:  sich hinsetzen ‘sit down’,  sich hinlegen ‘lie down’;  but  aufstehen ‘stand  up’

Changana:   ku ti-­‐tsakela ‘be(come)  happy’;  but  ku hundzuka ‘be(come)  angry’

Introduction

IMPORTANT  TYPOLOGICAL  OBSERVATIONS  REGARDING  MIDDLE  MARKING  (KEMMER  1993:20-­‐21)

• Some degree of  synchronic variation

French:   l’eau bouille vs.   l’eau se bouille ‘the water  boils’    le glace fond   vs. le glace se fond   ‘the ice  melts’

Hungarian:  kéredz-­‐ vs.  kéredz-­‐ked-­‐ ‘ask,  request’

Old  Norse:  hugna vs.  hugna-­‐sk ‘think,  feel’

Introduction

TYPOLOGY  OF  MIDDLE  MARKING  SYSTEMS  (Kemmer 1993:24-­‐26)

• One-­‐form  middle system:  usually MM  =  RM

REFLEXIVE MIDDLEGerman Er  sieht sich. Er  fürchtet sich.

‘He  sees himself.’ ‘He  is  afraid.’French Il se frappe. Il se plaint.

‘He  hits  himself.’ ‘He  complains.’

Introduction

TYPOLOGY  OF  MIDDLE  MARKING  SYSTEMS  (Kemmer 1993:24-­‐26)

• Two-­‐form  cognate system:  MM  (light)  <  RM  (heavy)

REFLEXIVE MIDDLEDutch Hij  ziet  zichzelf. Hij  kleedt  zich aan.

‘He  sees himself.’ ‘He’s getting dressed.’Russian Ivan  uvidel sebja. On  utomil-­‐sja.

‘Ivan  saw himself.’ ‘He  grew weary.’

Introduction

TYPOLOGY  OF  MIDDLE  MARKING  SYSTEMS  (Kemmer 1993:24-­‐26)

• Two-­‐form  non-­‐cognate system:  MM  ||  RM

REFLEXIVE MIDDLELatin se -­‐rTurkish kendi-­‐ -­‐In-­‐

Introduction

WHAT  ABOUT  BANTU?

• Kemmer’s formal typology presumes that languages have  a  single  MM which is  either cognate or  non-­‐cognate with the RM  (although see the discussion on  p.26  on  systems  that can be classified in  between two types)

• Changana (S53)  and Pangwa (G64)  à one-­‐form  middle system  (Kemmer 1993:26)  

(1)  Reflexive/middle  -­‐ti-­‐ku ti-­‐tekela ‘take  for  oneself’  (p.17) INDIRECT  MIDDLEku-­‐ti-­‐milela ‘germinate,  sprout’  (p.19) SPONTANEOUS  EVENTku ti-­‐tsakela ‘be(come)  happy’  (p.21) EMOTIVE  MIDDLEku ti-­‐nwaya ‘scratch,  rub  oneself’  (p.61) BODILY  ACTION  MIDDLE

(2)  Reciprocal/middle  -­‐an-­‐ (Kemmer analyzes  this  suffix  as  -­‐na,  probably  after  the  original  source)ku ringa-­‐na ‘be  similar’ NATURALLY  RECIPROCALku hamba-­‐na ‘be  separate,  be  different’ idem.ku thlanga-­‐na ‘reunite,  be  reunited’ SOCIATIVE  MIDDLE

Introduction

• Bantu languagesàmultiple-­‐form  system

• PB *-­‐ik-­‐ neuter*-­‐am-­‐ positional (stative)*-­‐an-­‐ associative (reciprocal)*-­‐uk-­‐ separative itr.  (reversive)*-­‐i-­‐ reflexive

Middle markers  in  Bantu

Neuter *-­‐ik-­‐

• 3  groups of  constructions

• First  group:  Logical object  of  active clause  is  promoted to subject  position and logical subject  is  demoted or  omitted.  PrototypicalInitiators  such as  Actors/Agents (and Instruments)  often cannotsurface in  oblique phrases,  whereas non-­‐prototypical Initiators  suchas  (generic)  Experiencers and Natural  Forces can.

• Includes anticausative,  mediopassive and passive

Neuter *-­‐ik-­‐

(3) BENA (G63)  (Morrison  2011:307) ANTICAUSATIVE

u-­‐tu-­‐bihi a-­‐haa-­‐deeny-­‐ih-­‐ile   igólo.  

AUG12-­‐CL12-­‐tree     SP12-­‐PST3-­‐break-­‐NT-­‐FV   yesterday

‘The  twig  broke  yesterday.’

(4) CHEWA  (Dubinsky  &  Simango 1996:751) MEDIOPASSIVE

mbale zi-­‐na-­‐tsuk-­‐ik-­‐a   (*ndi Naphiri).

plates   AGR-­‐PST-­‐wash-­‐NT-­‐FV   by  Naphiri

‘The  plates  were  washed  (*by  Naphiri).’

(5) TUMBUKA  (Chavula 2016:65) PASSIVE

Nduna zi-­‐ka-­‐cem-­‐ek-­‐a na Chikulamayembe.

CL10.minister SP10-­‐PST-­‐call-­‐NT-­‐FV with CL1.Chikulamayembe

‘The  ministers  were called for by Chikulamayembe.’

Neuter *-­‐ik-­‐

• Second  group of  constructions are  patient-­‐oriented potentials:  subject  is  typically patient-­‐like  participant  to which a  quality,  denotedby the marked verb,  is  attributed

• Includes potential passive and facilitative

Neuter *-­‐ik-­‐(6) SWAHILI  (G42)  (Seidl  &  Dimitriadis  2002:254) POTENTIAL  PASSIVE

godoro   li-­‐na-­‐lal-­‐ik-­‐a.mattress   SM5-­‐PRS-­‐sleep-­‐NT-­‐FV

‘This  mattress  can  be  slept  on.’(7) TSWANA  (S31)  (Creissels  2002:403) FACILITATIVE  (POSITIVE)

Mae  a  thubega  motlhofo.

màɩ   á-­‐thúb-­‐ɛχ-­‐à   mɷtɬhɷfɷ.  CL6.œuf   SP6-­‐casser-­‐NT-­‐FIN   facilement‘Les  œufs  se  cassent  facilement.’  (‘The  eggs  break  easily.’)

(8) TUMBUKA  (N21)  (Chavula  2016:84) FACILITATIVE  (NEGATIVE)tiyi wa-­‐ku-­‐mw-­‐ek-­‐a yayi na cifundizi.CL1.tea SM1-­‐PRS-­‐drink-­‐NT-­‐FV NEG with NP7.heat

‘Tea  can  hardly  be  drunk  when  it  is  hot.’

Neuter *-­‐ik-­‐

• Third and last  type  of  constructions restricted to verbs of  perception:  Experiencer is  demoted/omitted and subject  position is  eitheroccupied by promoted Stimulus  participant  or  covert  genericparticipant  (=  impersonal construction with expletive agreement)

• Incudes Stimulus constructions and Evidential constructions

Neuter *-­‐ik-­‐(9) LUGANDA (JE15) (Luganda  Corpus  of  Deo Kawalya) STIMULUS  CONSTRUCTION

[…]  birabike bulungi nga biteredde.bi-­‐lab-­‐ik-­‐e   bu-­‐lungi   nga bi-­‐tereer-­‐e.  

SM8-­‐see-­‐NT-­‐SBJ   CL14-­‐nice   like   SM8-­‐be.in.order-­‐SBJ‘[…]  so  that  they  look  like  they  are  nice  and  in  order.’

(10) LURAGOOLI  (JE32)  (Bowler  &  Gluckman 2016) EVIDENTIAL  CONSTRUCTIONa. e-­‐hol-­‐ek-­‐a                      kuresa vu-­‐geni vu-­‐ar-­‐ɛ vu-­‐hare INDIRECT  (HEARSAY)

9-­‐hear-­‐AC-­‐FV        like 15-­‐party 15-­‐COP-­‐FV 15-­‐good

‘It  sounds  like  the  party  was  fun.’ DIRECT  (AUDITORY)b. ga-­‐hol-­‐ek-­‐a kuresa vu-­‐geni vu-­‐ar-­‐ɛ vu-­‐hare

6-­‐hear-­‐AC-­‐FV like 15-­‐party 15-­‐COP-­‐FV 15-­‐good

‘It  sounds  like  the  party  was  fun.’

Neuter *-­‐ik-­‐

• Not canonical middle marker• Its locus  in  middle domain spans only patient-­‐oriented constructions• Rather large  part  of  -­‐ik-­‐ constructions are  generally notincluded/discussed in  literature on  middle• Potential passive,  stative,  stimulus,  evidential

• However,  -­‐ik-­‐ conforms  to the definition of  ‘middle’  as  encoding a  “cluster  of  deagentivized (intransitivized)  syntactic patterns”  that“focus  the activity expressed by the base  verb on  the first  argument  (Subject)”  (Kulikov  2013:265).

Direct  Reflexive

One-­‐Participant    Events

Reciprocal

NaturalReciprocalEvents

Collective

NaturalCollectiveEvents

Grooming

ChainingEvents

Indirect  Reflexive

IndirectMiddle

LogophoricReflexive

LogophoricMiddle

Two-­‐ParticipantEvents

PassiveMiddle

Passive

EmotionMiddle

CognitionMiddle

SpontaneousAction  or  Process

PotentialPassive

Facilitative

Stimulus-­‐OrientedEvents

Evidential

TranslationalMotion

Non-­‐TranslationalMotion

Change  InBody  Posture

Stative

Canonical middle

-ik-

Associative *-­‐an-­‐

• Characteristically polysemous throughout Bantu

“In addition to expressing reciprocity, examples of related but not exactly reciprocal uses areattested from all over Bantu. In Nen (A44; …), the reflex of *-­‐an-­‐ is used to express joint actions byseveral agents (and also plurality of the addressee of imperative forms). In Kela (C75), *-­‐an-­‐expresses repetitive or intensive actions, in Songye (L22) it expresses actions directed towardsseveral other people, and in Shona (S12) it is “used of a single subject with reference to its partsand their relation to one another” (Fortune 1955:219; e.g. =gony-­‐an-­‐a ‘curl’ < =gony-­‐a ‘bend’).Similar examples could be cited from many other languages.” (Schadeberg 2003:76)

Associative *-­‐an-­‐

• Bostoen  et  al. 2015:  extensive overview of  polysemy of  reflexes of  *-­‐an-­‐ in  Bantu• Sociative/collective• Reciprocal• Natural  collective• Natural  reciprocal• Chaining• Antipassive• Intensive/extensive• Iterative• Comitative/instrumental• Body  action  middle• Cognition middle• Spontaneous event  middle• Mediopassive• Potential

Associative *-­‐an-­‐

• Bostoen  et  al. 2015:  extensive overview of  polysemy of  reflexes of  *-­‐an-­‐ in  Bantu• Sociative/collective• Reciprocal• Natural  collective• Natural  reciprocal• Chaining• Antipassive• Intensive/extensive• Iterative• Comitative/instrumental• Body  action  middle• Cognition middle• Spontaneous event  middle• Mediopassive• Potential

Associative *-­‐an-­‐

• Bostoen  et  al. 2015:  extensive overview of  polysemy of  reflexes of  *-­‐an-­‐ in  Bantu• Sociative/collective• Reciprocal• Natural  collective• Natural  reciprocal• Chaining• Antipassive• Intensive/extensive• Iterative• Comitative/instrumental• Body  action  middle• Cognition middle• Spontaneous event  middle• Mediopassive• Potential

Associative *-­‐an-­‐

• Bostoen  et  al. 2015:  extensive overview of  polysemy of  reflexes of  *-­‐an-­‐ in  Bantu• Sociative/collective• Reciprocal• Natural  collective• Natural  reciprocal• Chaining• Antipassive• Intensive/extensive• Iterative• Comitative/instrumental• Body  action  middle• Cognition middle• Spontaneous event  middle• Mediopassive• Potential

Associative *-­‐an-­‐

• Bostoen  et  al. 2015:  extensive overview of  polysemy of  reflexes of  *-­‐an-­‐ in  Bantu• Sociative/collective• Reciprocal• Natural  collective• Natural  reciprocal• Chaining• Antipassive• Intensive/extensive• Iterative• Comitative/instrumental• Body  action  middle• Cognition middle• Spontaneous event  middle• Mediopassive• Potential

Associative *-­‐an-­‐

• Bostoen  et  al. 2015:  extensive overview of  polysemy of  reflexes of  *-­‐an-­‐ in  Bantu• Sociative/collective• Reciprocal• Natural  collective• Natural  reciprocal• Chaining• Antipassive• Intensive/extensive• Iterative• Comitative/instrumental• Body  action  middle• Cognition middle• Spontaneous event  middle• Mediopassive• Potential

Associative *-­‐an-­‐

• Bostoen  et  al. 2015:  extensive overview of  polysemy of  reflexes of  *-­‐an-­‐ in  Bantu• Sociative/collective• Reciprocal• Natural  collective• Natural  reciprocal• Chaining• Antipassive• Intensive/extensive• Iterative• Comitative/instrumental• Body  action  middle• Cognition middle• Spontaneous event  middle• Mediopassive• Potential

Direct  Reflexive

One-­‐Participant    Events

Reciprocal

NaturalReciprocalEvents

Collective

NaturalCollectiveEvents

Grooming

ChainingEvents

Indirect  Reflexive

IndirectMiddle

LogophoricReflexive

LogophoricMiddle

Two-­‐ParticipantEvents

PassiveMiddle

Passive

EmotionMiddle

CognitionMiddle

SpontaneousAction  or  Process

PotentialPassive

Facilitative

TranslationalMotion

Non-­‐TranslationalMotion

Change  InBody  Posture

Stative

Antipassive

Intensive/Extensive

Iterative

Comitative/Instrumental

Agent-­‐OrientedPotential

Canonical middle

-an-

Positional *-­‐am-­‐

• “The  common  element  of  meaning is  ‘assuming a  position’,  or  -­‐ whenused in  a  perfective aspect  form  -­‐ ‘to be in  a  position’.”  (Schadeberg  2003:75)• Closely related to middle classes  of  non-­‐translational motion  andchange  in  body  posture• Items  in  Bantu Lexical Reconstruction 3  provide wider range  of  middlesemantics:  positional -­‐ spontaneous event  -­‐ non-­‐translational motion  -­‐ emotion -­‐ translational motion  -­‐ cognition

Positional *-­‐am-­‐• Positional *bátam être  couché  à  plat;  être  plat be  flat  or  level;  (i)  lie  flat

*dʊdam être  droit be  straight

*bókam être  assis  sp. sit  sp.

• Spontaneous *pákam être  serré,  être  coincé be  jammed,  be  wedged

*còmam être  inséré,  être  placé  dans be  inserted,  put  in

*bòmbam être  trempé be  wet

• Non-­‐translational  motion *jɪnam se  pencher bend  over

*jácam ouvrir  la  bouche;  bâiller open  the  mouth;  yawn

*pàpam battre  des  ailes,  voleter flap  wings,  flutter

• Emotion *bʊngam être  triste be  sad

*cʊnam être  de  mauvaise  humeur to  be  in  a  bad  humour

*dápam être  gourmand be  greedy  in  eating

• Translational  motion *dʊngam aller  droit go  straight

*búgam pagayer paddle

*tèntam se  mettre  en  haut  de go  at  the  top  of

• Cognition *dúdam oublier forget

Positional *-­‐am-­‐

• Known to encode passive construction in  many zone  C  languages

LEKE  (C14)  (Vanhoudt 1987:177-­‐178)Passive:bo-­‐wɔng-­‐am-­‐e bɔɔngɔmɔ ‘être  ramassé’bo-­‐kund-­‐am-­‐e bokundámá ‘être  enterré’bo-­‐sund-­‐am-­‐e bosundame ‘laisser  ôter  de  la  tête  par  quelqu’un’bo-­‐tub-­‐am-­‐e   botubame ‘être transpercé,  piqué’

Positional *-­‐am-­‐

• Known  to  encode  passive  construction  in  many  zone  C  languages

LEKE  (C14)  (Vanhoudt  1987:177-­‐178)Middle:  bo-­‐wus-­‐am-­‐e   búúsámé   ‘se  cacher,  aller  aux  toilettes’bo-­‐zíng-­‐am-­‐e   bozíngámé   ‘s’enrouler’bo-­‐yɛk-­‐am-­‐é   bɛɛkyɛmɛ   ‘s’incliner’bo-­‐yɛk-­‐y-­‐am-­‐é   bɛɛkyámɛ   ‘se  laisser  incliner’bo-­‐da-­‐am-­‐e   bodamé   ‘s’étendre’

Positional *-­‐am-­‐

• Known  to  encode  passive  construction  in  many  zone  C  languagesNTOMBA  (C35a)  (Mangulu  2010:168)-­‐tɛl-­‐   ‘être  debout’ > -­‐tɛl-­‐ɛm-­‐ɛ   ‘se  dresser,  se  tenir  debout’-­‐βom-­‐   ‘tuer’ > -­‐βom-­‐am-­‐a   ‘être  tué’-­‐túŋg-­‐   ‘se  prendre’ > -­‐túŋg-­‐am-­‐a   ‘être  pris’

BOLIA  (C35b)  (Mamet  1960:37)kela   ‘faire’   > kelama   ‘être  fait’  kúla   ‘battre,  frapper’ > kúlama   ‘être  battu’  tanda   ‘déployer’   > tandema   ‘être  déployé’ténaka   ‘couper’   > ténakema ‘être  coupé’lɛmbɛ   ‘frapper’   > lɛmbɛmɛ   ‘être  frappé’

Positional *-­‐am-­‐

• Known  to  encode  passive  construction  in  many  zone  C  languages

LINGALA  (C36d)  (Meeuwis  2010:155-­‐156)

“The  extension  -­‐am-­‐  (rarely,  -­‐em-­‐)  occurs  in  passive  forms.  The  agent,  if  expressed,  is  identified  by  means  of  a  prepositional  phrase  with  na  (‘by’).”

Mbóngo   e-­‐bómb-­‐ám-­‐ákí   na  moyíbi.money          3SG.INAN-­‐hide-­‐PASS-­‐PAST1  by  thief‘The  money  was  hidden  by  the  thief.’

LOMONGO  (C61)  (Hulstaert  1965:247,  249)-­‐am-­‐ :  « Ce  suffixe  s’emploie  dans  les  deux  sens :  le  passif  et  le  statif-­‐inchoatif. »

Bobúngá  bonko  bóbúngama  wɛyɔwɛyɔ.‘Cette  faute  est  commise  fréquemment.’

Direct  Reflexive

One-­‐Participant    Events

Reciprocal

NaturalReciprocalEvents

Collective

NaturalCollectiveEvents

Grooming

ChainingEvents

Indirect  Reflexive

IndirectMiddle

LogophoricReflexive

LogophoricMiddle

Two-­‐ParticipantEvents

PassiveMiddle

Passive

EmotionMiddle

CognitionMiddle

SpontaneousAction  or  Process

PotentialPassive

Facilitative

TranslationalMotion

Non-­‐TranslationalMotion

Change  InBody  Posture

Stative

Canonical middle

-am-

Separative itr.  *-­‐uk-­‐

• Intransitive member  of  separative couple *-­‐ud-­‐/-­‐uk-­‐

• Word  list  provided in  Schadeberg  (1982)  of  PB  verbs with *-­‐uk-­‐,  manyof  which denote middle situation types

• In  Cuwabo (P34)  -­‐uk-­‐ developed canonical passive function (Guérois &  Bostoen  2015)• Two passive morphemes:  -­‐iw-­‐ (<*-­‐ibʊ)  and  -­‐uw-­‐ (<  *-­‐uk-­‐)

Separative itr.  *-­‐uk-­‐

• -­‐uw-­‐ as  passive marker  in  Cuwabo (P34)

mi-­‐ri dhí-­‐ni-­‐ó-­‐j-­‐uw-­‐á na nyenyéleCL4-­‐tree SP4-­‐IPFV.DJ-­‐15-­‐eat-­‐PASS-­‐FV by CL10.ant‘The  trees  are  being eaten by the ants.’

Direct  Reflexive

One-­‐Participant    Events

Reciprocal

NaturalReciprocalEvents

Collective

NaturalCollectiveEvents

Grooming

ChainingEvents

Indirect  Reflexive

IndirectMiddle

LogophoricReflexive

LogophoricMiddle

Two-­‐ParticipantEvents

PassiveMiddle

Passive

EmotionMiddle

CognitionMiddle

SpontaneousAction  or  Process

PotentialPassive

Facilitative

TranslationalMotion

Non-­‐TranslationalMotion

Change  InBody  Posture

Stative

Canonical middle

-uk-

Reflexive *-­‐i-­‐

• South-­‐Western  Bantu languages demonstrate reflexive-­‐reciprocal-­‐middle polysemy (Bostoen  2010)

Kwamashi:  -­‐cí-­‐REFL -­‐thaura ‘scratch’ > -­‐cí-­‐thaura ‘to scratch  oneself’MID -­‐cí-­‐enga ‘dress  well,  wear ornaments’  (grooming)MID -­‐cí-­‐neka ‘stand  on  tiptoe’  (change  in  body  posture)MID -­‐cí-­‐uba ‘be at  peace’  (emotion)

Reflexive *-­‐i-­‐

• South-­‐Western  Bantu languages demonstrate reflexive-­‐reciprocal-­‐middle polysemy (Bostoen  2010)

Kwamashi:  -­‐cí-­‐RECP ka-­‐tú-­‐cí-­‐mon-­‐ine rero.

NEG-­‐SP1PL-­‐REC-­‐see-­‐PRF today‘We  have  not seen each other today.’

Reflexive *-­‐i-­‐

• Distribution:  Cokwe-­‐Lucazi groupLanguage Polysemy Prefix Suffix

Cokwe (K11) YES -­‐li-­‐ -­‐an-­‐

Ngangela (K12) YES -­‐li-­‐ -­‐an-­‐

Lucazi (K13) YES -­‐li-­‐ -­‐sian-­‐

Luvale (K14) YES -­‐li-­‐ -­‐asan-­‐

Mbunda (K15) YES -­‐li-­‐ ?

Reflexive *-­‐i-­‐

• Distribution:  Lunda group

• Cokwe-­‐Lucazi group =  core area  of  ‘reflexive-­‐reciprocal’  polysemy

Language Polysemy Prefix Suffix

Salampasu (L51) NO -­‐i-­‐ -­‐asyan-­‐

Lunda (L52) YES -­‐di-­‐ -­‐añan-­‐

Ruund (L53) NO -­‐i:-­‐ -­‐ijaan-­‐

Reflexive *-­‐i-­‐

• Reflexive-­‐middle polysemy also apparent  from Bantu languageexamples in  Kemmer (1993)

CHANGANAReflexive/middle  -­‐ti-­‐ku ti-­‐tekela ‘take  for  oneself’  (p.17) INDIRECT  MIDDLEku-­‐ti-­‐milela ‘germinate,  sprout’  (p.19) SPONTANEOUS  EVENTku ti-­‐tsakela ‘be(come)  happy’  (p.21) EMOTIVE  MIDDLEku ti-­‐nwaya ‘scratch,  rub  oneself’  (p.61) BODILY  ACTION  MIDDLE

Direct  Reflexive

One-­‐Participant    Events

Reciprocal

NaturalReciprocalEvents

Collective

NaturalCollectiveEvents

Grooming

ChainingEvents

Indirect  Reflexive

IndirectMiddle

LogophoricReflexive

LogophoricMiddle

Two-­‐ParticipantEvents

PassiveMiddle

Passive

EmotionMiddle

CognitionMiddle

SpontaneousAction  or  Process

PotentialPassive

Facilitative

TranslationalMotion

Non-­‐TranslationalMotion

Change  InBody  Posture

Stative

Canonical middle

-i-

Conclusion

Conclusion

• Typologically interesting:  multiple  form  system

• Claim  is  not that extensions should be analyzed as  MMs for Bantu as  a  whole

• Middle status  =  language-­‐specific

• Semantic range  in  middle domain  can be different  from one languageto another

Conclusion

• None  of  the extensions is  a  “typical”  MM  àmany developedmeanings within and outside ofmiddle domain

• Is  it helpful/meaningful for Bantuists and/or  general linguists tocategorize/label  these  extensions as  ‘middle’?  • CON:  Functions not always exclusively ‘middle’• PRO:  Recurrent polysemy and semantic range  within middle domain  can bemotivated through properties (semantic and syntactic)  related to middle voice