markhenning
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: MarkHenning](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061300/54c6bfa34a7959c4648b45fd/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Benefit of a Cross Media Brand Strategy
![Page 2: MarkHenning](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061300/54c6bfa34a7959c4648b45fd/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Digital is a channel NOT a strategy
Not meant to be utilized stand alone Complements traditional marketing communications Provides connections and integration across campaign
![Page 3: MarkHenning](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061300/54c6bfa34a7959c4648b45fd/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Online Marketing Goal /Measurement Hierarchy
Reach
Brand
Behavior
SEARCHVIDEO
(pre-roll)
(viral)
SITEDISPLAY
(large and smaller units)
(opt-in only)
Media StrategyWhat is the brand trying to accomplish?
MAIL DIGITALOUTDOOR
TV RADIOPRINT
Dot size = strength
![Page 4: MarkHenning](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061300/54c6bfa34a7959c4648b45fd/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Online Marketing Goal /Measurement Hierarchy
Reach
Brand
Behavior
SEARCHVIDEO
(pre-roll)
(viral)
SITEDISPLAY
(large and smaller units)
(opt-in only)
Dot size = strength
Digital StrategyWhat is the brand trying to accomplish?
![Page 5: MarkHenning](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061300/54c6bfa34a7959c4648b45fd/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Cross MediaWhat Synergies can we Expect?
Source: Dynamic Logic CrossMedia Research N=32 2004 – 2007Delta = Exposed-Non-Exposed
TV
AidedBrand
Awareness
MessageAssociation
BrandFavourability
PurchaseIntent
7.6 3.92.9
4.6
Incremental Effect of Mediumon Brand Metrics: Overall Studies
Average Percentage Point Increaseover Non-Exposed Baseline
Avera
ge D
elt
a
Case Study
![Page 6: MarkHenning](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061300/54c6bfa34a7959c4648b45fd/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Digital provides incremental benefit
TV
TV+ Digital
AidedBrand
Awareness
MessageAssociation
BrandFavourability
PurchaseIntent
7.6 3.92.9
4.63.7
1.71.6
1.0
Incremental Effect of Mediumon Brand Metrics: Overall Studies
Average Percentage Point Increaseover Non-Exposed Baseline
Avera
ge D
elt
a
Case Study
Source: Dynamic Logic CrossMedia Research N=32 2004 – 2007Delta = Exposed-Non-Exposed
![Page 7: MarkHenning](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061300/54c6bfa34a7959c4648b45fd/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Incremental Effect of Mediumon Brand Metrics: Overall Studies
Average Percentage Point Increaseover Non-Exposed Baseline
TV + Digital + Print
TV
TV + Digital
AidedBrand
Awareness
MessageAssociation
BrandFavourability
PurchaseIntent
7.6 3.92.9
4.63.7
1.71.6
1.0
5.7
5.7
7.3
7.0
Avera
ge D
elt
a
Asia Pacific Norms are more positive
towards digital and have higher
persuasion metric increases
Case Study
Source: Dynamic Logic CrossMedia Research N=32 2004 – 2007Delta = Exposed-Non-Exposed
Integrated Media Plan Works Best!
![Page 8: MarkHenning](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061300/54c6bfa34a7959c4648b45fd/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
A Cross Media Case Study
Background:
Test launch of a new car model Launch campaign comprised TV, Press and Digital The key brand goal was to increase purchase consideration
![Page 9: MarkHenning](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061300/54c6bfa34a7959c4648b45fd/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The overall media campaign reached 74% of the target audience
TV Only42%
TV + Press14%
TV + Digital4%
All 34%
Unexposed26%
Total TV – 64%
Total Press – 26%
Total Digital – 12%
Press + Digital 1%
Press only7%
Digital Only 2%
![Page 10: MarkHenning](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061300/54c6bfa34a7959c4648b45fd/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Total uplift in brand consideration was 11%
35 35
11
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Pre Post
% C
onsi
dera
tion
Uplift
Base
Base: Total target audience sampled
![Page 11: MarkHenning](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061300/54c6bfa34a7959c4648b45fd/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Uplift in consideration driven by all mediaTV contributed the most
35 35
6
41
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Pre Post
% C
onsi
der
atio
n
Digital
Press
TV
Base
Base: Total target audience sampled
![Page 12: MarkHenning](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061300/54c6bfa34a7959c4648b45fd/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Digital and Press over-deliver relative to investment
6.00
7.00
1.80
0.25
4.00
1.00
Uplift In Consideration Cost Of Media (£m)
Digital
Press
TV
Base: Total target audience sampled
![Page 13: MarkHenning](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061300/54c6bfa34a7959c4648b45fd/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Digital was most efficientat delivering consideration uplift
% u
plif
t in
consi
dera
tion p
er
£m
sp
ent
Base: Total target audience sampled
TV%
Press%
Digital%
0.6 1.6 3.9
![Page 14: MarkHenning](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061300/54c6bfa34a7959c4648b45fd/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
But, different channels drove different aspects of the brand
TV Press Online Total Uplift
An up and coming brand 4.8 2.3 9.8 16.9
A leading brand 6.2 0.0 2.0 8.2
A brand that I can trust 1.6 6.8 1.0 9.4
Is a friendly brand 1.2 0.3 0.7 2.2
Always first with new ideas 5.4 3.1 9.8 18.2
A Premium brand 8.2 0.2 4.8 13.2
Stands out from the crowd 4.6 6.0 4.1 14.7
Base: Total target audience sampled
Points change in Brand Metric due to each media
![Page 15: MarkHenning](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061300/54c6bfa34a7959c4648b45fd/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
13% of the total campaign effectwas due to media synergies
5.40
3.40
0.75
0.60
0.60
0.25
Shift in metric resulting frommedium working in synergywith other media in thecampaign
Shift in metric resulting frommedium on its own withoutsynergy effects
+6%
Base: Total target audience sampled
+4.0% +1.0%
TV Press Online
![Page 16: MarkHenning](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022061300/54c6bfa34a7959c4648b45fd/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
How important is brand consistency across digital channels?
A: CrucialB: Somewhat important
C: Not important