life cycle assessment in forestry - formec · life cycle assessment in forestry what is lca? life...
TRANSCRIPT
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
52nd International Symposium on Forestry Mechanization42nd edition of the Council on Forest Engineering06 - 10 October 2019, Sopron | Forchtenstein (Hungary | Austria)
Martin KÜHMAIER1, Christian KANZIAN1, Iris KRAL1, Gerhard PIRINGER2
1University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU)2University of Applied Sciences Burgenland
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Why is it relevant to talk about LCA?
How do we supply societies needs without harming the environment or future generations’ ability to meet their needs?
We have many options to meet our demands
How to choose the “best” option?
11k2.wordpress.com
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
What is LCA?
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a tool to assess the potential environmental impacts of products, systems, or services at all stages in their life cycle [ISO 14001:2004].
www.kyoceradocumentsolutions.comPiringer 2016
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
History of LCA
1969
1972
www.nuffoodsspectrum.in
1979
LCAFirst LCA-Journal
1991 1996
First ISO Standard
1997
UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative
2003
www.theguardian.com
thelcacentre.com
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
History of LCA in forestry
Pulp andpaperindustryinitiative
First LCA studies
1993
COST LCA offorestproducts
2001
0102030405060708090
100
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Publ
icat
ions
per
yea
r
Year
Integration of forestryprocesses in Ecoinvent
2013
Fuelwoodinitiates a boom in LCA studies
2006
1993
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
20 years of LCA in forestry
Klein et al. (2015)
28 studies:22 different peer-reviewed studies,four original reports and two databases
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
20 years of LCA in forestry
Klein et al. (2015)
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
ISO standard 14040 (methodology)
Interpretation
Impact Assessment
Inventory Analysis
Goal and Scope Definition
Venditti et al. 2009
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Life cycle inventory
All relevant stages of the life of a product needs to be included
- Raw Materials/Energy Needs- Manufacturing- Transportation, Storage & Distribution- Use, reuse, and maintenance - Recycle & Waste Management
Venditti et al. 2009
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Impact Assessment – Global Warming Potential
coolaustralia.org
Lifetime (years) GWP (100 years)Carbon dioxide CO2 30–95 1Methane CH4 12 28Nitrous oxide N20 121 265CFC-12 CCl2F2 100 10 200HCFC-22 CHClF2 12 1 760Tetrafluoromethane CF4 50 000 6 630Hexafluoroethane C2F6 10 000 11 100Sulfur hexafluoride SF6 3 200 23 500Nitrogen trifluoride NF3 500 16 100
EEA
IPCC
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Databases and software
openlca.org
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Forest machines – fuel consumption & emissions
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Num
ber o
f obs
erva
tions
Fuel consumption Fuel consumption & emissions Emissions Argnani 2019
355 observations from 158 studies
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Harvester – fuel consumption
Argnani 2019
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Case Study – Chain SawFuel consumption
Klugmann (2006). Laufzeiten und Kosten der Motorsäge in der Holzernte. Report Nr. 39/2006
Fuel
con
sum
ptio
n(l/
m³)
DBH (cm)
Tree speciesSoftwood
Hardwood
163 observations
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Case Study – Chain SawFuel consumption & emissions
Data loggerSingle boardcomputer & WLAN
FlowmeterRev-counterHall effect sensor
Temperature sensor
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Husqvarna 372XPHusqvarna 550XPG
Partial currentGas analyzer
Measurement Speed
Case Study – Chain SawFuel consumption & emissions
Exhaust pipe modul
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Emissions measured Carbon monoxide (CO), NDIR Carbon dioxide (CO2), NDIR Nitric oxide (NO), IR Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), NDUV Oxygen (O2), paramagnetic
Gas analysis equipment
Case Study – Chain SawFuel consumption & emissions
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Case Study – Chain SawFuel consumption & emissions
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Case Study – Chain SawFuel consumption & emissions
Fuel
con
sum
ptio
n(g
/h)
Beach
Tree speciesSpruce
Chain saw
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Two-thirds of the emissions for the harvesting process
CO2 emissions amount to 0.03% of the stored CO2
Manufacturing process is not relevant Galovits 2019
Case Study – Chain SawGlobal warming potential
67%
33%
0%0,000
0,020
0,040
0,060
0,080
0,100
0,120
0,140
0,160
0,180
0,200
Felling and processingwith chain saw
Supply of fuel Production of chain saw
kg C
O2
equ
m-3
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Case study – Cable ForwarderInput & Output
0.2 m³ Piece volume14 m³ Load volume271 m Extraction distance
12.4 m³/h Productivity
Extracting with cable forwarder
1 hour
Diesel9.927 kg
Forwarder6.43 * 10-5
Lubricants0.354 kg
Transfer (trailer)19.5 tkm
Transfer (own machine)
0.02 h
Timber12.4 m³
Nitrogen oxidesNMVOC, non-methane volatile organic compounds, unspecified originPAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsParticulates, < 2.5 umParticulates, > 10 umParticulates, > 2.5 um, and < 10umSeleniumZinc
AmmoniaBenzo(a)pyreneCadmiumCarbon dioxide, fossilCarbon monoxide, fossilCopperDinitrogen monoxideDioxins, measured as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxinMethane, fossilNickel
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Case study – Cable ForwarderGlobal warming potential
64%
12% 9% 13%3%
0,00
0,50
1,00
1,50
2,00
2,50
3,00
Extraction withcable yarder
Production ofcable yarder
Transfer cableyarder
Supply of diesel Supply oflubricants and oil
kg C
O2
equ
m-3
Two-thirds of the emissions for extraction process
CO2 emissions amount to 0.4% of the CO2 stored the wood stored
Potential savings
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Case study - Forest roadsGlobal warming potential
64%; 6,99
59%; 5,66
4%; 0,42
15%; 1,41
35%; 3,78
21%; 2,01
0,00 2,00 4,00 6,00 8,00 10,00 12,00
Tannleiten
Kofljoch
kg CO2 equ m-3
Planning and supervision Tree felling EarthworksDrainage Embankment stabilisation Maintenance
Kofljoch Tannleiten
Length [m] 690 660
Timber [m³] 1,900 1,700
Excavator[hours]
242 209
Culverts [n] 14 0
Mansory [m] 25 0
Graveltransport [tkm]
15,000 45,000
Machinetransport [tkm]
1,200 4,140
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Comparison of harvesting systems in steepterrain
Wanzenböck 2019
8,02
3,94 3,94
8,026,85
0,350,70
0,702,58
2,58
0,0
3,0
6,0
9,0
12,0
Chain saw -Cable yarder CTL
Chain saw -Cable forwarder
CTL
Cable harvester- Cable
forwarder CTL
Cable harvester- Cable yarder
CTL
Chain saw -Cable yarder -Processor WT
kg C
O2
equ
m-3
Extracting Extracting & Processing Felling Felling & Processing
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Wanzenböck 2019
Comparison of harvesting systems in steepterrain – Scenario analysis
0
5
10
15
20
D 60 m D 180 m D 540 m
kg C
O2
equ
m-3
Chain saw - Cable yarder CTL Chain saw - Cable forwarder CTLCable harvester - Cable forwarder CTL Cable harvester - Cable yarder CTLChain saw - Cable yarder - Processor WT
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Global warming potential for timber supply in Austria
GWP = 26.2 kg CO2 pro m³
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
New Technologies:Chain saw: Fuel vs Battery
Austria (Europe) could save up to 800 t CO2 equ (16,000 t CO2 equ ) per year with a complete switch to chain saw battery technologies.
Huber & Nemestothy 2019
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
Felling Felling & Delimbing Felling, Delimbing &Cross-cutting
Cross-cutting
kg C
O2
equ
m-3
Fuel mix Battery
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
A general reduction of 5% in fuel consumption in timber harvesting and transport in Austria (Europe) would reduce the global warming potential by approx. 20,000 t CO2 equ (400,000 t CO2 equ ).
New Technologies:Reduction of fuel consumption
2,50
2,60
2,70
2,80
2,90
3,00
3,10
3,20
3,30
3,40
BAU Reduction 2 % Reduction 5 % Reduction 10 % Reduction 20 %
kg C
O2
equ
m-3
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Assuming that the use of biodiesel can reduce emissions by 40% in timber harvesting and by 16% in road transport, this would mean an annual saving of 45,000 t CO2 equ (900,000 t CO2 equ) for harvesting in Austria (Europe) and an additional 57,000 t CO2 equ (1,140,000 t CO2 equ) timber transport.
Klvac & Skoupy 2009 Ecoinvent 2019
New Technologies:Change from diesel to biodiesel
0,00
5,00
10,00
15,00
20,00
25,00
30,00
35,00
Harvester Forwarder Truck
kg C
O2
equ
m-3
Diesel Bio diesel
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
An increase of the rail share to 30% would bring an annual saving in Austria of 16,800 t CO2 equ. With a railway share of 50%, it would even be 84,000 t CO2 equ.
BAUEcoinvent 2019
Schmitz 2018
New Technologies:Change of modal split
27,0 26,1 25,2 24,3 23,4 22,6 21,7 20,8 19,9 19,1 18,2 17,3 16,4 15,5 14,7 13,8
0,0
5,0
10,0
15,0
20,0
25,0
30,0
100Truck 0Railway
95Truck
05Railway
90Truck
10Railway
85Truck
15Railway
80Truck
20Railway
75Truck
25Railway
70Truck
30Railway
65Truck
35Railway
60Truck
40Railway
55Truck
45Railway
50Truck
50Railway
45Truck
55Railway
40Truck
60Railway
35Truck
65Railway
30Truck
70Railway
25Truck
75Railway
kg C
O2
equ
m-3
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Baumvolumen [m³] 0,64
Stückvolumen [m³] 0,32
Stückanzahl [n] 1,84
BHD [cm] 45,97
Baumhöhe [m] 29,67
Beastungsprozent [%] 47,87
Rückedistanz [m] 142
Neigung der Rückedistanz [%] 58,5
Ladedistanz [m] 71
Zuzugsdistanz [m] 29,84
Fuhrenvolumen [m³] 14
Transportdistanz Rundholz, mit LKW [km] 50
Transportdistanz Rundholz, mit Bahn [km] 200
Transportdistanz Hackgut [km] 108
Code ProzessProduktivität
[m³/PSH15]CC [kg CO2
equ/PSH15]CC [kg CO2
equ/m³]
3.1 Fällen, mit Motorsäge, AT 7,93 2,68 0,343.1.N Fällen, mit Akku-Motorsäge, AT 6,73 0,52 0,00
3.2 Fällen und Entasten, mit Motorsäge, AT 3,37 1,56 0,003.2.N Fällen und Entasten, mit Akku-Motorsäge, AT 2,86 0,31 0,00
3.3 Fällen, Entasten und Trennschnitt, mit Motorsäge, AT 2,30 0,71 0,003.3.N Fällen, Entasten und Trennschnitt, mit Akku-Motorsäge, AT 1,95 0,27 0,00
TILCA - Systemrechner 1.0- Ökobilanzierung neuer Technologien bei der Holzbereitstellung vom Waldort bis zum Werk -
Objective: To calculate the global warming potential for selected supply chains
Selection by check box
Implmentation of productivity models
- stand data
- location data
Decision support:LCA of timber supply chains
Code ProzessProduktivität
[m³/PSH15]CC [kg CO2
equ/PSH15]CC [kg CO2
equ/m³]
3.1 Fällen, mit Motorsäge, AT 7,93 2,68 0,343.1.N Fällen, mit Akku-Motorsäge, AT 6,73 0,52 0,00
3.2 Fällen und Entasten, mit Motorsäge, AT 3,37 1,56 0,003.2.N Fällen und Entasten, mit Akku-Motorsäge, AT 2,86 0,31 0,00
3.3 Fällen, Entasten und Trennschnitt, mit Motorsäge, AT 2,30 0,71 0,003.3.N Fällen, Entasten und Trennschnitt, mit Akku-Motorsäge, AT 1,95 0,27 0,00
3.4 Fällen, Entasten und Trennschnitt, mit Harvester, AT 31,92 91,83 0,003.4.N2 Fällen, Entasten, Entrinden und Trennschnitt, mit Harvester, AT 17,71 91,83 0,00
3.5 Fällen, Entasten und Trennschnitt, mit Seilharvester, AT 23,59 73,81 0,00
3.6 Rücken, Rundholz, mit Traktor und Krananhänger, bis Forststraße, AT 6,37 15,48 0,003.7 Rücken, Schlagabraum, mit Traktor und Krananhänger, bis Forststraße, AT 10,20 15,48 0,003.8 Rücken, Rundholz, mit Schlepper, bis Forststraße, AT 4,31 34,09 0,003.9 Rücken, Bäume, mit Schlepper, bis Forststraße, AT 4,31 34,09 0,00
3.10 Rücken, Bäume, mit Traktor und Seilwinde, bis Forststraße, AT 9,21 11,90 0,003.11 Rücken, Rundholz, mit Traktor und Seilwinde, bis Forststraße, AT 9,21 11,90 0,003.12 Rücken, Bäume, mit Seilgerät, bis Forststraße und Aufarbeiten, Bäume, mit integriertem Prozessor, AT 8,41 48,50 5,773.13 Rücken, Rundholz, mit Sappel, bis Forststraße, AT 3,00 0,00 0,003.14 Rücken, Rundholz, mit Forwarder, bis Forststraße, AT 74,07 49,71 0,003.15 Rücken, Schlagabraum, mit Forwarder, bis Forststraße, AT 7,50 49,71 0,003.16 Rücken, Rundholz, mit Seilforwarder, bis Forststraße, AT 14,96 45,78 0,003.17 Rücken, Rundholz, mit Seilgerät, bis Forststraße, AT 8,34 43,35 0,00
3.18 Trennschnitt, mit Motorsäge, AT 11,90 2,68 0,003.18.N Trennschnitt, mit Akku-Motorsäge, AT 10,10 0,52 0,00
3.19 Entasten und Trennschnitt, mit Bagger-Prozessor, AT 13,00 71,89 0,00
3.20 Hacken, Energieholz, mit LKW und Aufbau-Hacker, AT 26,83 172,25 0,00
4.1 Transport, Rundholz, mit Traktor und Anhänger, AT 0,004.2 Transport, Rundholz, mit Rundholz-LKW, AT 8,424.3 Transport, Rundholz, mit Bahn, AT 8,284.4 Transport, Hackgut, mit Traktor und Anhänger, AT 0,004.5 Transport, Hackgut, mit Schüttgut-LKW, AT 0,00
Summe 22,81
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Conclusion & Outlook
General overview of LCA in timber supply
Comparison of best practice examples worldwide
- New technologies
- Improvement of operational procedures
Including LCA in machine development and harvesting planning
Considering technical, economic and social requirementsKoller GmbH 2019
Life Cycle Assessment in Forestry
Than
kyo
u!
The project „Life-cycle-assessment of new technologies of timber supply from the forest to the plant” was funded by:
Austrian Federal Ministry for Sustainability and Tourism
Austrian Federal Forests
Forstbetrieb Franz Mayr-Melnhof-Saurau