lgc update

7
LGC UPDATE 2012 NCGFOA Summer Conference Sharon Edmundson 7/16/2012

Upload: dezso

Post on 25-Feb-2016

36 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

LGC UPDATE. 2012 NCGFOA Summer Conference. Sharon Edmundson. 7/16/2012. ACCOUNTING IMPLICATIONS OF HB 1779. Two primary concerns Recording of revenue and cost of collections Tax collection percentage calculation for budgeting and reporting purposes. ACCOUNTING IMPLICATIONS OF HB 1779. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: LGC UPDATE

LGC UPDATE2012 NCGFOA Summer Conference

Sharon Edmundson7/16/2012

Page 2: LGC UPDATE

2

ACCOUNTING IMPLICATIONS OF HB 1779

• Two primary concerns

o Recording of revenue and cost of collections

o Tax collection percentage calculation for budgeting and reporting purposes

Page 3: LGC UPDATE

3

ACCOUNTING IMPLICATIONS OF HB 1779

• Revenue and Cost of Collectionso Revenue will be received from DOR in a manner

similar to sales tax and other shared revenue monthly distributions net of cost of collections

o Units will record revenue net of costs as a property tax revenue

o No recording of costs by local unitso No recording of a levy for motor vehicle taxes, no

recording of a receivable of total levy at local levelo Will accrue a receivable at fiscal year end similar to

sales tax for the taxes that were paid to the State before year end but not yet distributed to local units

Page 4: LGC UPDATE

4

ACCOUNTING IMPLICATIONS OF HB 1779

• G.S. 159-13(b) (6) states that “The estimated percentage of collection

of property taxes shall not be greater than the percentage of the levy

actually realized in cash as of June 30 during the preceding fiscal

year. For purposes of the calculation under this subdivision only, the

levy for the registered motor vehicle tax under Article 22A of Chapter

105 of the General Statutes shall be based on the nine‑month period

ending March 31 of the preceding fiscal year, and the collections

realized in cash with respect to this levy shall be based on the

12‑month period ending June 30 of the preceding fiscal year.”

Page 5: LGC UPDATE

5

ACCOUNTING IMPLICATIONS OF HB 1779

• Will be asking General Assembly to revise this statute to

remove the reference to the motor vehicle tax levy

• Hopeful this can be done early in the session

• Tax collection percentage will not include motor vehicle

taxes

o Unit has no control over the collection process

o Tax collector in unit will not be charged with collecting

motor vehicle tax

Page 6: LGC UPDATE

6

Questions?

July 16, 2012

Page 7: LGC UPDATE

Thank you!Together , we can build and maintain a fiscally strong and prosperous North Carolina.

www.NCTreasurer.com [email protected]