legal pitfalls & protections in mental health treatment january 20, 2012 david ivers mitchell...
TRANSCRIPT
LEGAL PITFALLS & PROTECTIONS IN MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENTJanuary 20, 2012
David IversMitchell Blackstock Ivers & Sneddon Law Firm1010 West Third StreetLittle Rock, Arkansas 72201(501) [email protected]
These materials are for instructional purposes only, and are not to be relied on for legal advice. Legal counsel should always be consulted for specific problems or questions.
1
MITCHELL BLACKSTOCKMITCHELL BLACKSTOCK IVERS SNEDDON PLLC
Table of Contents
Speaker Biography...................................................... 3 Malpractice................................................................. 4 Informed Consent........................................................ 5 Legal Safeguards....................................................... 15 Other Treatment Issues.............................................. 18 Power of Attorney...................................................... 19 Advanced Psychiatric Directives.................................... 20 Guardianship............................................................. 22 Rights of Individuals with Mental Illness........................ 25 Still On the Books...................................................... 29 “Enlightened” View Since 1975..................................... 30 Right to Refuse Treatment........................................... 31 Sterilization............................................................... 36
2
Speaker Biography David Ivers, J.D. is an attorney in Little Rock with the firm of
Mitchell, Blackstock, Ivers & Sneddon. Mr. Ivers’ practice focuses on health law, including healthcare legislation, healthcare reform, Medicaid, Medicare, fraud and abuse laws, compliance, and HIPAA/HITECH. He represents numerous healthcare providers, including behavioral health. Mr. Ivers also handles employment matters for healthcare providers. He is one of the authors of the Arkansas Medical Society’s Legal Guide, which explains legal topics of relevance to healthcare providers. He attended Arkansas State University (Wilson Award winner 1984) and graduated with honors from UALR School of Law in 1992. Since that time, he has worked at the Mitchell Blackstock Law Firm where he has been a partner since 1997.
3
Malpractice "Medical injury" or "injury" under Ark. Code Ann. 16-114-201
means any adverse consequences resulting from professional services by provider: without informed consent in breach of warranty or in violation of contract from failure to diagnose from premature abandonment of a patient or of a course of
treatment from failure to properly maintain equipment or appliances
necessary to the rendition of such services or otherwise arising out of or sustained in the course of
such services.
4
Informed Consent
Must obtain informed consent before initiating treatment, procedure, or surgery.
Battery – no consent Malpractice – not “fully informed”
5
Informed Consent -- continued
Lack of informed consent exists if you: Fail to give type of information regarding
treatment, procedure, or surgery as would customarily have been given by other providers with similar training and experience in the same or similar locality.
6
Informed Consent – Content
Content should include: Dx (if applicable) Nature of contemplated treatment or
procedure Risks involved Probability of success Risks of foregoing the procedure Existence of any alternatives
7
Informed Consent -- Who may consent (20-9-602)
Arkansas Code 20-9-602 applies to “any surgical or medical treatment or procedure …that is suggested, recommended, prescribed, or directed by a licensed physician.”
Even though non-physicians not addressed, best course is to follow statute.
8
Informed Consent – Who may consent(20-9-602) -- continued Adults Parents for minor child or adult child of “unsound mind” Married person, whether adult or minor Females regardless of age when in connection with pregnancy or
childbirth (not abortion) Persons in loco parentis and formal guardians Emancipated minors Unemancipated minors “of sufficient intelligence to understand and
appreciate the consequences” Adults for minor siblings or adults sibling of unsound mind Grandparents in absence of corresponding authorized parent Married persons for spouse of unsound mind Adult children for parents of unsound mind Incarcerated minors Foster parents or preadoptive parents with some restrictions
9
Informed Consent -- continued
Material issues for jury: Whether person of “ordinary intelligence and awareness”
could “reasonably be expected to know of the risks or hazards”
Whether the injured patient (or person giving consent) actually knew of the risks or hazards
Whether the injured party would have undergone treatment regardless of risk or did not wish to be informed
Whether it was reasonable for provider to limit information because it could substantially affect patient’s condition
10
Informed Consent -- continued
Objective, not subjective standard (Aronson v. Harriman, 1995)
Does not apply in emergencies (consent presumed)
11
Informed Consent -- continued
Do’s and Don’ts Fill in blanks before, not after getting signature
on the form (Kelsey v. NARMC, 2011) Don’t present to client who is medicated
heavily (Kelsey) If you say a “physician/nurse/therapist has
discussed,” then make sure he/she has If client’s competency in doubt, get guardian’s
signature or person authorized on his/her behalf
12
Informed Consent – Forms
Sample forms online or for purchase “Informed Consent in Psychotherapy
& Counseling: Forms, Standards & Guidelines, & References,” available at http://kspope.com/consent/ index.php#forms
Obtain legal review of forms in light of your particular practice
13
Informed Consent – Special Situations
Neuroleptic (antipsychotic) medications
“Innovative treatment” (Johnson opinion, Roaf concurring)
Research on humans Detailed rules apply and greater
protections are proposed (OHRP) http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp
Any situation with enhanced risk14
Some Legal Safeguards
At Intake: Fees and billing policies/Payment Agreement Consider specifying which services available if limited On-call/after-hours mental health emergency
numbers Suicide risk screen Informed Consents Permission to Transport if anticipated (make sure
your insurance covers) Client/guardian signature
15
Legal Safeguards -- continued Suicide risk assessment in crisis or when risk factors
present Document “against medical advice” (Young v. Gastro-
Intestinal Center, 2005) AIMS & EPS assessments when clinically indicated If client needs services you don’t provide, make referral
and document Carefully document reasons for discharge,
recommendations, etc. If you take responsibility upon discharge from inpatient
setting, follow discharge instructions or carefully document departure (Est. of Beard v. DaySpring)
16
Legal Safeguards -- continued Make sure all staff aware of mandatory reporting
requirements List which clinical abbreviations are not to be used due
to risk of confusion, mistake Develop protocols for high-alert and look-alike/sound-
alike meds Document response to changes in client status Policies and training on suicide risk detection and
prevention Remove access to anything that could be used as
weapon or instrument of self-harm
17
Other Treatment Issues Don’t count on malpractice insurance if you go
outside the bounds of professional conduct (McQuay v. Guntharp, 1999, fondling breasts)
Follow procedures but not blindly – Dodson v. Charter Behavioral Health System
Tarasoff Exception -- Confidentiality gives way to duty to warn of imminent harm
18
Power of Attorney
Written authorization for someone else to act on your behalf. “Springing” – effective only when declared
incompetent “Durable” – goes into effect immediately, “Health Care POA” – Relates only to health
care matters One size does not fit all – read before relying
19
Advanced Psychiatric Directives
Advisable for clients in event of crisis In Arkansas, two situations are covered
by “advance directive” statute: terminally ill permanently unconscious Some states have specific statutes for
Psychiatric Advance Directives, but Arkansas does not
20
Advanced Psychiatric Directives -- continued
Arkansas statute authorizing a “Durable Power of Attorney” can be used because very flexible
Form on DBHS website is Durable Power of Attorney, but uses terminology of Psychiatric Advance Directivehttp://humanservices.arkansas.gov/dbhs/Documents/ DBHS% 20Website%20-%20Psychiatric%20Advance%20Directive% 20brochure%20(consumers)%20June% 202011.pdf
21
Guardianship Guardian may be appointed for any incapacitated
person A professional must perform eval that includes:
medical and physical condition; adaptive behavior; intellectual functioning; and recommendation as to the specific areas for which assistance is
needed and the least restrictive alternatives available.
A Person must be “substantially without capacity to care for himself or herself or his or her estate.”
22
Guardianship – Typical formIn the Circuit Court of __________ County, Arkansas.
In the Matter of CD,an Incapacitated Person (a Minor) Case No. __________
LETTERS OF GUARDIANSHIPBe it known that AB, whose address is __________, having been duly
appointed guardian of the person and estate (person/estate) of CD, anincapacitated person (a minor) and having qualified as such guardian, ishereby authorized to have the care and custody of and to exercise controlover the person and to take possession of and administer the property(have the care and custody of and to exercise control over the person) (totake possession of and administer the property) of said incapacitatedperson (minor), as authorized by law.
Dated this _____ day of __________ , 20___.(SEAL)
[NOTE--May be “limited” guardianship – read before relying.]
23
Guardianship – Public Guardian
Available for “incapacitated person receiving services from any public agency”
Office of Public Guardian for Adults located within DHS
24
Rights of Individuals with Mental Illness
U.S. CONSTITUTION 5th Am. Due Process 8th Am. Cruel and Unusual Punishment 14th Am. Equal Prot, Due Process (Sometimes privacy, free speech &
thought, and other liberty interests)
25
Rights -- continued
Federal Statutes Americans with Disabilities Act Civil Rights of Institutionalized
Persons Act Fair Housing Amendments Act Individuals with Disabilities Education
Act
26
Rights -- continued
Arkansas Constitution Art. 19, Section 19. “It shall be the
duty of the General Assembly to provide by law for the … treatment of the insane.”
Due Process, Equal Protection, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Fair Trial
27
Rights -- continued
Arkansas Statutes Civil Commitment (inpt & outpt) Criminal Commitment Arkansas Civil Rights Act (Rules of Evidence)
28
Still on the Books
“It shall be the duty of all peace officers to arrest any insane or drunken persons whom they may find at large and not in the care of some discreet person.” (Ark. Code Ann. 20-47-101)
29
“Enlightened” view since 1975 Mental illness alone not enough to lock up someone, at
least not since O’Connor v. Donaldson, 1975.
“May the State fence in the harmless mentally ill solely to save its citizens from exposure to those whose ways are different? One might as well ask if the State, to avoid public unease, could incarcerate all who are physically unattractive or socially eccentric. Mere public intolerance or animosity cannot constitutionally justify the deprivation of a person's physical liberty.” -- Justice Stewart (O’Connor v. Donaldson)
30
Right to Refuse Treatment –Civil Commitments Can be civilly committed if danger to self or
others Some limits under Arkansas statute:
In initial period of evaluation and treatment, no psychotherapy or medications whose effects last longer than 72 hours
No psychosurgery if involuntary admitted Electroconvulsive therapy may be used against
patient’s wishes if clear and convincing proof that such treatment is necessary
Short and long-acting meds may be used during 45-day and 180-day admission periods
31
Right to Refuse Treatment – Criminal Settings
Generally talking about psychotropic medications
Forcing antipsychotic meds on convicted prisoner is unconstitutional except in limited circumstances, e.g., danger to self or others, health at risk (Washington v. Harper, 1990)
32
Right to Refuse Treatment – Criminal--continued State can force antipsychotic meds solely to restore
competency only if: 1. Important government interest at stake (rendering
defendant competent for trial) 2. Involuntary medication will significantly further
that state interest 3. No less restrictive means 4. Medications unlikely to have side effects that
impair defendant in trial 5. Medically appropriate (Sell v. U.S., 2003)
33
Right to Refuse Treatment – Criminal -- continued
State cannot execute insane (Ford v. Wainwright, 1986)
State cannot execute prisoner while incompetent, but can force administration of medication to restore competency for purposes of execution (Singleton v. Norris, 8th Cir. 2003) If in prisoner’s “best medical interests”
34
Right to Refuse Treatment – Community
“Kendra’s Laws”: involuntary “assisted outpatient treatment,” for persons with mental illness who, in view of their treatment history and present circumstances, are unlikely to survive safely in the community without supervisionhttp://www.omh.ny.gov/omhweb/Kendra_web/Ksummary.htm
35