lecture 17 arch 631 seismic design 3 architectural structures iii...

6
1 F2009abn sixteen seismic design Seismic Design 1 Lecture 17 Applied Architectural Structures ARCH 631 lecture © Reuters 2004 APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS ARCH 631 DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2019 Seismic Design 2 Lecture 16 Architectural Structures III ARCH 631 F2007abn Earthquake Design dynamic vs. static loading amplification of static affect time duration acceleration & velocity F2009abn Earthquake Design hazard types surface fault ruptures ground failures tsunamis (sea waves) Seismic Design 3 Lecture 17 Architectural Structures III ARCH 631 http://nisee.berkeley.edu/godden Seismic Design 4 Lecture 16 Architectural Structures III ARCH 631 F2007abn Earthquake Design hazard types: ground shaking

Upload: others

Post on 23-Jun-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Lecture 17 ARCH 631 Seismic Design 3 Architectural Structures III …faculty.arch.tamu.edu/media/cms_page_media/4350/notes16... · 2019-01-23 · 3 8 ture 16 III RCH 631 n t t Low

1

F2009abn

sixteen

seismic design

Seismic Design 1

Lecture 17

Applied Architectural Structures

ARCH 631

lecture

© Reuters 2004

APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES:

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS

ARCH 631

DR. ANNE NICHOLS

SPRING 2019

Seismic Design 2

Lecture 16

Architectural Structures III

ARCH 631

F2007abn

Earthquake Design

• dynamic vs. static loading

– amplification of static affect

– time duration

– acceleration & velocity

F2009abn

Earthquake Design

• hazard types

– surface fault ruptures

– ground failures

– tsunamis (sea waves)

Seismic Design 3

Lecture 17

Architectural Structures III

ARCH 631

http://nisee.berkeley.edu/godden

Seismic Design 4

Lecture 16

Architectural Structures III

ARCH 631

F2007abn

Earthquake Design

• hazard types: ground shaking

Page 2: Lecture 17 ARCH 631 Seismic Design 3 Architectural Structures III …faculty.arch.tamu.edu/media/cms_page_media/4350/notes16... · 2019-01-23 · 3 8 ture 16 III RCH 631 n t t Low

2

F2007abnSeismic Design 5

Lecture 16

Architectural Structures III

ARCH 631

Earthquake Design

• fundamental considerations

– building configuration

• symmetry with respect to mass

– stiffness or vibration control

• symmetry with respect to lateral resistance

mechanisms

• member sizes, rigidity, braces, dampers

– anchorage of parts and components

• seismic joints

– “tie the building together”

Seismic Design 6

Lecture 16

Architectural Structures III

ARCH 631

F2007abn

Earthquake Design

• building response

Seismic Design 7

Lecture 16

Architectural Structures III

ARCH 631

F2007abn

Earthquake Design

• building response

– seismic joints

– L, T, H

shapes bad

Seismic Design 8

Lecture 16

Architectural Structures III

ARCH 631

F2008abn

Earthquake Design

• building response

– center of mass

• ex.:

– center of rigidity

• ex. (R = 1/):

– torsion (eccentricity)

NS

NSW

xWx

y

yE R

xRr

Page 3: Lecture 17 ARCH 631 Seismic Design 3 Architectural Structures III …faculty.arch.tamu.edu/media/cms_page_media/4350/notes16... · 2019-01-23 · 3 8 ture 16 III RCH 631 n t t Low

3

Seismic Design 8

Lecture 16

Architectural Structures III

ARCH 631

F2007abn

• lateral ground movement

• drift

Low-Rise Response

Seismic Design 9

Lecture 16

Architectural Structures III

ARCH 631

F2007abn

Frequency and Period

• natural period of vibration

– avoid resonance

– hard to predict seismic period

– affected by soil

– short period

• high stiffness

– long period

• low stiffness

“To ring the bell, the sexton must pull

on the downswing of the bell in time

with the natural frequency of the bell.”

F2007abnSeismic Design 10

Lecture 16

Architectural Structures III

ARCH 631

Earthquake Design

• codes

– purpose is to provide a simple uniform

method of determining potential

earthquake forces in any location with

enough accuracy to ensure a safe and

economical building design

– National Earthquake Hazards

Reduction Program (NEHRP)

– evaluate structural response (spectrum) to

earthquake (motion vs. time)

Seismic Design 11

Lecture 16

Architectural Structures III

ARCH 631

F2007abn

Earthquake Design Loads

• derived from W & amplification factors

• at base of structure:

– Z, zone

– I, importance (1.0 – 1.5)

– C, stiffness related to period of vibration

– RW, response modifications

for building type (1.25 – 8)

• distribution per floor

– simple vs. tall -

WRZICWV

WhhW xx

Page 4: Lecture 17 ARCH 631 Seismic Design 3 Architectural Structures III …faculty.arch.tamu.edu/media/cms_page_media/4350/notes16... · 2019-01-23 · 3 8 ture 16 III RCH 631 n t t Low

4

F2012abn

Earthquake Design Loads (ASCE-7)

• at base of structure:

– W, usually dead load but can include some live load

– Cs, seismic design coefficient

– SDS, short period design spectral response acceleration

– SD1, one second design spectral response acceleration

– R, response modification factor

– I, importance factor

– T, building period

– S1, mapped one-second spectral acceleration Seismic Design 13

Lecture 16

Applied Architectural Structures

ARCH 631

WCVS

)I/R(

SC DS

S

)I/R(T

SD1

but not greater than

F2012abn

Earthquake Design Loads (ASCE-7)

Seismic Design 14

Lecture 16

Applied Architectural Structures

ARCH 631

F2009abn

Earthquake-Resistant Structures

• absorb energy input from ground motion

• pins can’t, rigid frames can

– energy goes into forming plastic hinges (ductility)

– continuous

– steel, timber or reinforced concrete

• redundancy helpful

• use rigid diaphragms

• horizontal members fail before verticalsSeismic Design 13

Lecture 17

Architectural Structures III

ARCH 631

http://nisee.berkeley.edu/godden

Seismic Design 13

Lecture 16

Architectural Structures III

ARCH 631

F2007abn

Earthquake Design

• soft first stories

– problematic

– ground level story weaker than those above

• usually higher

• reduced strength in vertical elements

• significantly increased mass above

Page 5: Lecture 17 ARCH 631 Seismic Design 3 Architectural Structures III …faculty.arch.tamu.edu/media/cms_page_media/4350/notes16... · 2019-01-23 · 3 8 ture 16 III RCH 631 n t t Low

5

Seismic Design 14

Lecture 16

Architectural Structures III

ARCH 631

F2007abn

Earthquake Design

• want horizontal elements to fail before

vertical elements do

Seismic Design 15

Lecture 16

Architectural Structures III

ARCH 631

F2007abn

Earthquake Design

• passive base isolation

– low stiffness layer

between foundation

and structure

Seismic Design 16

Lecture 16

Architectural Structures III

ARCH 631

F2007abn

Earthquake Design

• tuned mass damping systems

Seismic Design 17

Lecture 16

Architectural Structures III

ARCH 631

F2007abn

Earthquake Design

• dampers

• elastomer bearings

– neoprene or rubber

• sliding systems

• friction pendulum

systems

Page 6: Lecture 17 ARCH 631 Seismic Design 3 Architectural Structures III …faculty.arch.tamu.edu/media/cms_page_media/4350/notes16... · 2019-01-23 · 3 8 ture 16 III RCH 631 n t t Low

6

F2011abn

Sendai Mediatheque, Japan, 2011

Seismic Design 19

Lecture 16

Architectural Structures III

ARCH 631

© Wizneko 2011

F2013abn

Damage Levels – FEMA

Seismic Design 22

Lecture 16

Applied Architectural Structures

ARCH 631

• Operational

– minimal or no damage to structure

– extremely low risk to life safety

• Immediate Occupancy

– minimal to no damage to structure, minor

damage to non-structural,

– very low risk to life safety

F2013abn

Damage Levels – FEMA (cont.)

Seismic Design 23

Lecture 16

Applied Architectural Structures

ARCH 631

• Life Safety

– may have extensive damage to structure,

some repair may be economically

impractical

– low risk to life safety

• Collapse Prevention

– not suffered complete or partial collapse,

may have severe internal damage to

structure, likely complete economic loss

– damage that poses risk to life safety

Seismic Design 18

Lecture 16

Architectural Structures III

ARCH 631

F2007abn

Architectural Considerations

Video – Buildings at Risk