lead teacher workshop 2

45
ead Teacher Workshop

Upload: lacota-bailey

Post on 31-Dec-2015

36 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Lead Teacher Workshop 2. Purpose of this session is…. To consider how your school’s current approach to assessment supports teachers to make overall teacher judgements (OTJs). Continue to explore the mathematics behind the National Standards - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Page 2: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Purpose of this session is…

To consider how your school’s current approach to assessment supports teachers to make overall teacher judgements (OTJs).

Continue to explore the mathematics behind the National Standards

Share and discuss examples of reporting to refect on current reporting systems.

Page 3: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Overview (9.10 – 12.00)

•What are the current issues?•Strand – Geometry and the Standards•Revising the Number Framework•Making OTJ’s using evidence from a child in

your school.

Morning Tea•Reporting principles•Share and discuss report templates

Page 4: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Warm Up

Space Zapper

(FIO Link Number Book 1, Page 8)

Page 5: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Reflection on the Implementation of National Standards

How have you used the learning from the first lead teachers workshop? (if attended).

What are your current successes and challenges?

Put each of these onto separate postits.

Page 6: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Clarification of questions from our last session.

• Why is there no ‘well above’ when there is ‘well below’?

• The Ministry require the numbers of children at well below for funding reasons. Schools are welcome to use ‘well above’ if they wish.

• Is there a separate progression for ELLs in Maths?• No. Maths is an academic language for all -however

be reasonable!!!• Has the Expectation grid been finalised? • Yes - it is on the wiki now.• Are examples of plain language comments coming?• Term 3

Page 7: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Engaging with the Standards through a rich task

Map Making (from the NZ Orienteering Manual)

• Make a map using the objects in your bag. • Hide the ‘treasure’• Describe how to get your teddy bear to the

treasure.

Write down the language you used.

Place yourself on the progressions.

Page 8: Lead Teacher Workshop 2
Page 9: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

N, E, S, W NE, SE, NW SW,

NNE, NNW 175 degrees

SSE, SSW north

ENE WNW

ESE WSW

What’s the difference between a grid reference and a co-ordinate?

Page 10: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Engaging with other tasks, focusing on Level 1

•Bears (Group Solutions)

•Exemplar (from 2nd tier support)

How do these differ from the map making task?

Page 11: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

What makes a rich mathematical task?

It must be accessible to everyone at the start.It needs to allow further challenges and be extendible.It should invite learners to make decisions.It should involve learners in speculating, hypothesis making &• testing, proving & explaining, reflecting, interpreting.It should not restrict learners from searching in other directions.It should promote discussion and communication.It should encourage originality/invention.It should encourage ‘what if’ and ‘what if not’ questions.It should have an element of surprise.It should be enjoyable. Ahmed (1987)

Page 12: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

How could you adapt the teddies activity to make it richer?

Page 13: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

What does this have to do with making an Overall Teacher Judgement?

Page 14: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

An Overall Teacher Judgement (OTJ) involves… Ref: tki.org.nz/Overall-teacher-judgement

drawing on and applying the evidence gathered up to a particular point in time in order to make an overall judgement about a student’s progress and achievement

Is this different to teachers continually adjusting their teaching to match learning needs based on what they notice? – If so, how?

Page 15: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Assessment Key Messages (page 12)

• When assessing a student’s achievement and progress, the teacher needs to make an overall teacher judgement (OTJ) about the student in relation to the whole standard (paragraph 1).

• A strong understanding of Number is vital …..the expectations for Number are the most critical requirement for meeting a standard” (paragraph 5).

• ..independently and most of the time (paragraph 4).

Page 16: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Revisiting The Number Framework

Stage

Stage Description, e.g. Advanced Counting

Page 17: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

The Number Framework

Stages

1 2 3 4

One-to-One Counting

Counting From One on

materials

Counting From One by

imaging

Advanced

Counting

Stage

5

Stage

6

Stage

7

Stage

8

Early Additive

Part-Whole

Advanced Additive

Part-Whole

Advanced Proportional

Part-Whole

Advanced Multiplicativ

e

Part-Whole

Page 18: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

1 2 3 4 5

After 1 year

After 2

years

After 3

years

End of Y4

End of Y5

End of Y6

End of Y7

End of Y8

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Curriculum levels

Mathematics Standards

Numeracy Strategy

Stages

Adult Numeracy Level

Page 19: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Where does

Grace sit for

Number?

Page 20: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Where does

Grace sit for

Number?

Page 21: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Stage 5, EA, Level 2

part-whole using addition facts, e.g. 18 + 8 Place value units without renaming, e.g. 40 + 50 = 90, 42 + 21 = 63and 87 – 30 = 57, 87 – 35 = 52

Multiplication using addition facts, e.g. 8 + 8 as 2 x 8, 6 tens as 6 x 10 ,

part whole using subtraction facts, e.g. 37-9 and simple connection between add/sub e.g.14-6=? solved using 7+7.Place value with simple renaming,e.g. 49 + 24 = , and 73 – 9

Multiplication using halving,e.g.14÷2=7 as 7+7 =14, doubling, and simple known facts e.g .2 x 6 = 12 so 3 x 6 = 18 (adding on),

What is the difference between ‘After 3 years at school’ and ‘By the end of Y4’?

Page 22: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Making a Best Fit Overall Teacher Judgement

(OTJ)

Page 23: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Observation of ProcessEvidence gained from informal assessment opportunities:

Learning ConversationsEvidence arising from Learning Conversations:

Test OutcomesEvidence gained from assessment tools, including standardised tools:

•Conferencing•Interviewing•Questioning•Explaining•Discussing

Overall Teacher

Judgement

Sources of evidence to support OTJ:

What is your initial assessment about where a child is at? Then use other evidence to defend/adjust your judgement.

Page 24: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Observation of ProcessEvidence gained from informal assessment opportunities:

Learning ConversationsEvidence arising from Learning Conversations:

Test OutcomesEvidence gained from assessment tools, including standardised tools:

•Conferencing•Interviewing•Questioning•Explaining•Discussing

Overall Teacher

Judgement

Sources of evidence to support OTJ:

What is your initial assessment about where a child is at? Then use other evidence to defend/adjust your judgement.

•Classroom Observation•Student books and tasks•Running Records•Student peer assessment•Gloss and IKAN

•6 year Observation Survey•PAT•Star•E-asTTle/AsTTle V4•GLoSS and IKAN

Page 25: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Alignment of formal tools

Page 26: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

FirstMake a “best fit” overall teacher judgment.What is your ‘gut feel’ about that child then support it

with evidence.

SecondConsider judgment in relation to student’s age or year

level

Third Identify next teaching and learning steps

Page 27: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Which standard is the best fit for each of these students?

Page 28: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Student A

So if he is a Y6 student he is.. above, at, below, well below?

Strengths, weaknesses?

Next learning steps?

Page 29: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Student B

Page 30: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Student C

Page 31: Lead Teacher Workshop 2
Page 32: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Your Turn!1. Share samples of work/other evidence

(informal and formal) about a child in your class.

2. All make independent judgements of that child (using the progressions to help).

3. Discuss and compare your judgements.

Page 33: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Moderation of OTJs

Why is this useful?To get a shared understanding of: • what students should be able to do at each standard• what student work should look like at each standard• how formal assessment tools relate to the standards• consitency of OTJ’s

Page 34: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Critical Questions for schools.

1. What should these children’s next learning steps be, and what does that mean for my teaching?

2. Which children do we need to consider as a whole staff or syndicate?

Page 35: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Curriculum/National Standards Reference Points

5 8Advanced

Proportional

High Achievers

High Achievers

High Achievers

High Achievers

High Achievers

High Achievers

47

Advanced Multiplicative

Cause for Concern

36

Advanced Additive

Cause for Concern

Cause for Concern

At Risk

25

Early Additive

Cause for Concern

Cause for Concern

At Risk At Risk

14

Advanced Counting

Cause for Concern

Cause for Concern

At Risk At Risk

3Counting from

One by Imaging

Cause for Concern

At Risk At Risk

2Counting from

One on Materials

At Risk

1One to One Counting

Cause for Concern

0Emergent

At Risk

NZC Strategy Stage

After 1 year

After 2 years

After 3 years

End of Year 4

End of Year 5

End of Year 6

End of Year 7

End of Year 8

End of Year 9

Page 36: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Reporting• NAG 2A (a) report to students and their

parents on the students’ progress and achievement in relation to National Standards. Reporting to parents in plain language in writing must be at least twice a year;

Reporting to the Board of Trustees:• Including in the school’s annual report the

number of students at, above, below and well below the standard including Maori, Pasifika and gender

Page 37: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Questions from the Self Review Tool for Reporting

– How do we ensure our reporting clearly describes students’ progress and achievement?

– How do we ensure our students are able to contribute to reporting?

– How do we develop effective partnerships with parents, families/whanau?

Page 38: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Reporting to parents

• Standards are written for ‘end of year’• Could report in relation to:

– The standard the student meets (i.e. best fit)– The year level standard (above, at below well

below) or – a scale the school is currently using.

• Need to report to parents in writing twice a year.• The first report should be in relation to expected

progress and achievement towards the end of year target. - If they have already met it - tell them so and what’s next?

Page 39: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Principles for reporting

• Involves the students

• Supports learning and next steps

• Language clear and easily understood

• Honest and transparent

• No surprises

• Strengthens educational partnerships with students and whānau

Page 40: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

What do parents want to know?

• What their child can do and how they have progressed

• Their child’s progress and achievement in relation to the standard for their year level

• Their child’s goals • How they can help

Page 41: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Tips for writing in plain language (from Reporting to Parents on TKI)

• Keep words, sentences and paragraphs short and simple. Bullet points work well for clarity.

• Inform then show, e.g. a piece of maths work.

• Encourage student comments.

• Leave out anything that is not relevant.

• Use a summary sentence to get to the point first, then explain in more detail.

• Use language that is familiar and easy to understand.

• When explaining a learning process, use actual examples where practical.

• Avoid jargon where possible. If absolutely necessary explain what it means every time.

• Be personal: use ‘I’, ‘my’, ‘their’, ‘her/he’, ‘you’.

• For assessment results – give clear final results

Page 42: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Share report examples

Page 43: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Planning Time

• What questions have been clarified?• What will you take away to use with your staff.

• http://mathsleadteachers.wikispaces.com/Albany+Browns+Bay+Cluster

Page 44: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

I SpyDeal out the cards in 4 rows of 8. The caller looks then says “I spy …..•the number before / after /in between…•a pair that make 10•two numbers that make…. 15)•two numbers with a difference of…•two numbers whose product is….etc.

The cards must be touching vertically, horizontally or diagonally

Page 45: Lead Teacher Workshop 2

Thought for the day

If you always do what you’ve always done -

you’ll always get what you’ve always got.