laccase as a new enzymatic label for enzyme immunoassay
TRANSCRIPT
This article was downloaded by: [University of North Carolina]On: 12 November 2014, At: 11:28Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH,UK
Analytical LettersPublication details, including instructions forauthors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lanl20
Laccase as a New EnzymaticLabel for Enzyme ImmunoassayOlga V. Skorobogat'ko a , Andrey L. Gindilis a , ElenaN. Troitskaya a , Alexander M. Shuster a & AlexanderI. Yaropolov aa A. N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry, RussianAcademy of Sciences , 117071, Moscow, RussiaPublished online: 22 Aug 2006.
To cite this article: Olga V. Skorobogat'ko , Andrey L. Gindilis , Elena N. Troitskaya ,Alexander M. Shuster & Alexander I. Yaropolov (1994) Laccase as a New EnzymaticLabel for Enzyme Immunoassay, Analytical Letters, 27:15, 2997-3012, DOI:10.1080/00032719408000307
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00032719408000307
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all theinformation (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform.However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make norepresentations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness,or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and viewsexpressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, andare not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of theContent should not be relied upon and should be independently verified withprimary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for anylosses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages,and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly orindirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of theContent.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan,sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone isexpressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found athttp://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
orth
Car
olin
a] a
t 11:
28 1
2 N
ovem
ber
2014
ANALYTICAL LETTERS, 27(15), 2997-3012 (1994)
LACCASE AS A NEW ENZYMATIC LABEL FOR ENZYME
IMMUNOASSAY.
KEY WORDS Laccase; Immuno-laccase Conjugates; Enzyme
Immunoassay .
Olga V.Skorobogat'ko, Andrey L. Gindilis, Elena N.Troitskaya,
Alexander M.Shuster, Alexander 1.Yaropolov.
ANBach Institute of Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117071 Moscow, Russia.
ABSTRACT
A new immunochemical reagent is suggested containing as an
enzyme marker laccase obtained from the cultural liquid of basidial
fungi Coriolus hirsutus. The feasibility of immuno-laccase conjugates in
different versions of immunoanalysis (sandwich, competitive and indirect
enzyme immunoassay) was demonstrated. The assay based on antibodv-
laccase conjugates is simpler than that employing antibody-peroxidase
2997
Copyright 0 1994 by Marcel Dekker, Inc.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
orth
Car
olin
a] a
t 11:
28 1
2 N
ovem
ber
2014
2998 SKOROBOGAT’KO ET AL.
conjugates, since in the former case air oxygen is used as the second
substrate of the enzymatic reaction.
INTRODUCTION
Enzyme immunoassay is widely used in biological sciences,
medicine, food industry, etc.l92. One of the most important advantages
of enzyme immunoassay is its high sensitivity which is achieved as a
rule, due to high catalytic activity of enzyme markers conjugated with
different ligands (antigens, antibodies, cofactors, biotin, protein A, etc.).
This means that selection of the marker enzyme and method of
conjugate synthesis is of prime importance for successful realization of
enzyme immunoassay. The choice of enzymes that can be employed as
markers is rather wide 2; however the most often used enzyme is
horseradish peroxidase 3. Despite of a number of this enzyme undoubtful
advantages resulting from catalytic and physicochemical properties,
peroxidase is also characterized by certain short comings such as strong
background coloration of the reaction mixture caused by the presence of
hydrogen peroxide and formation of inactive intermediate compound of
the enzyme in the course of catalysis, as well as some others
comprehensively described in the literature 1945.
We suggest to use as a marker enzyme laccase obtained from the
cultural liquid of basidial fungi Coriolus hirsutus. Laccase catalyzes the
oxidation of polyphenols, polyamines and some inorganic ions in the
presence of oxygen 5 9 6 9 7 . The enzyme represents a glycoprotein with
molecular mass of 55,000 consisting of a single polypeptide chain and
containing 17% of carbohydrate moieties per protein molecule. Previous
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
orth
Car
olin
a] a
t 11:
28 1
2 N
ovem
ber
2014
LACCASE 2999
investigations 8 showed that laccase possesses considerable pH and
thermostability. The values of Km determined for laccase and peroxidase
for a common series of chromogenic substrates are close to each other
and equal to OJ8-OJ9 mM and 0.2 mM respectively 4~7,899. The value of
Km for oxygen determined for laccase from different fungi is about 10-5
M, so that the enzyme is saturated with oxygen in the air atmosphere.
Laccase has following advantages as a marker enzyme compared
to peroxidase:
a) it accepts oxygen as the second substrate and hence is not inactivated
during the reaction;
b) it is less sensitive to the presence of metal ions varying oxidation
state in the reaction medium;
c) laccase based immunoassay can be carried out with standard reagent
and equipment used in peroxidase based analysis.
The aim of the present work was to develop laccase conjugates
suitable for immunoanalysis and to demonstrate their feasibility in
different versions of enzyme immunoassay in comparison with
immunoperoxidase conjugates of similar composition.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Buffers
The most frequently used ,uffers were: 0.0 M potassium
phosphate buffer (PBS) pH 7,4, (buffer "A'); 0.01 M PBS, pH 7,4,
containing 415 M sodium chloride (buffer "B); 0,Ol M PBS, pH 7,4,
containing 0,15 M sodium chloride and 0,05% Tween-20 (buffer "C");
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
orth
Car
olin
a] a
t 11:
28 1
2 N
ovem
ber
2014
3000 SKOROBOGAT'KO ET AL.
0.01 M PBS, pH 7.4, containing 0,15 M sodium chloride, 0,05% Tween-
20, 05% ovalbumin and OJ% cow fetal serum (buffer "D).
Enzvmes
Laccase was separated from the cultural liquid of basidial fungi
Coriolus hirsutus by precipitation with ammonium sulfate. Homogeneous
enzyme preparation was obtained by using a two-step purification
procedure 8 involving ion exchange chromatography on
Di+ethylaminoethylcellulose (Whatman Chemical Separation, Ltd, Kent,
UK) and gel-filtration on Toyopearl HW-55 (Toyo Soda MFG, Co., Ltd,
Japan).
AntiFens and Antibody
Homogeneous pig insulin was a generous gift from
Dr.IA.Donetsky.
Goat antimouse immunoglobulins and their conjugates with
peroxidase were obtained from Sigma Chemical Company, USA.
Mouse and rabbit class immunoglobulins, rabbit antimouse and
rabbit antihuman immunoglobulins were obtained as described 10.
Monoclonal antibodies E10A2 against insulin were kindly supplied
by Dr.T.V.Cherednikova and purified by affinity chromatography on
insulin-Sepharose 4B column.
Calculation of the Amount of IgG
Immunoglobulin concentrations were determined from adsorption
at 280 nm assuming extinction coefficient ts cm2 fmg and molecular
mass 150,000 11.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
orth
Car
olin
a] a
t 11:
28 1
2 N
ovem
ber
2014
L ACC AS E 3001
Preparation of insulin-SeDharose 4B
The affine sorbent insulin-Sepharose 4B was prepared according
to a standard procedure recommended by manufacturer (Pharmacia Fine
Chemicals AB, Uppsala, Sweden), which includes covalent attachment of
insulin (10 mg) to CN-Br-activated Sepharose.
Affinity-Purification of Monoclonal Antibodies against Insulin
Ascitic fluid (02-LO ml) containing 5-10 mg of monoclonal
antibodies was applied to a chromatography column (5 x 10 mm) packed
with insulin-Sepharose. Unadsorbed proteins were eluted with buffer "B.
Monoclonal antibodies were then eluted with 0.l M glycine-HC1 buffer,
pH 3,O. The eluate was immediately neutralized by addition of 02 M
TRIS-HCL buffer, pH 8.0. The fractions, containing monoclonal
antibodies were dialyzed against 0,02 M TRIS-HCL buffer, pH 7.4 and
stored at 40C in the presence of 0,l M NaN3.
Assav of Laccase
Catalytic activity of laccase was measured spectrophotometrically
using pyrocatechol 8 (Reachim, Russia) at 410 nm or 2,2'-azino-di(3-
eth~~benzthiazoline-6-sulphonic acid 374 (ABTS) (Sigma Chemical
Company, USA) at 405 nm as substrates. Before use pyrocatechol was
purified by sublimation in vacuum.
Svnthesis of conjugates bv periodate method
To a solution of 6 mg laccase in 1 ml of distilled water solution
of sodium periodate was added to a final concentration 0,12 M. The
mixture was incubated for 20 min in dark at room temperature and
diaked against 0.01 M potassium acetate buffer, pH 45, at
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
orth
Car
olin
a] a
t 11:
28 1
2 N
ovem
ber
2014
3002 SKOROBOGAT'KO ET AL.
4OC. The enzyme solution obtained in this way was gradually
supplemented with antibodies until enzyme/antibody molar ratio reached
the value of 2.5 and incubated at room temperature for 2 h, the pH
value of the mixture being kept at 68-9.0. After that sodium borohydride
was added to the solution in the amount of 1 mg per mg of laccase and
the mixture was incubated for 2 h at 4OC. The obtained conjugate was
dialyzed against 5 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 65 at 4 C for 16-
18 h. The conjugate was stored in 50% aqueous glycerol at -18OC 12.
Preparation of solid-phase sorbent with antigens
Polystyrene plates (Dynatech) were incubated with various
antigens such as pig insulin, rabbit antimouse immunoglobulins or rabbit
antihuman immunoglobulins. Antigen concentration was 10 mg/l in 0,05
M carbonate buffer, pH 9.0.
Sandwich Enzyme Immunoassay Procedure for Determination of Mouse
Polystyrene plates with adsorbed rabbit antimouse
immunoglobulins were incubated with known concentration of mouse
immunoglobulins at 37OC in buffer "D. After 2 h the mixture was
removed and plates were rinsed with buffer "C". Solution of laccase
conjugate with goat antibodies against mouse immunoglobulins (2
pg/ml) was placed into pits and after 1 h incubation at 37% plates
were rinsed with buffer "C" as described above. Catalytic activity of
immunosorbed laccase was measured spectrophotometrically by means of
Dinatech MP 600 immunoassay reader (USA) using ABTS as a
substrate.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
orth
Car
olin
a] a
t 11:
28 1
2 N
ovem
ber
2014
LACCASE 3003
Enzyme Immunoassav Procedure for Determination of Insulin by
Competitive Method
Plates with adsorbed insulin were incubated with solution
containing known concentrations of freely dissolved insulin and laccase
conjugate with monoclonal antibodies against insulin (2 pglml) for 1 h
at 37OC. After that the solution was removed and plates were rinsed
with buffer "C" as described above. Catalytic activity of bound enzyme
was measured using ABTS as a substrate.
Indirect Enzyme Immunoassav for Determination of Monoclonal
Antibodies against Insulin
Plates with adsorbed insulin were treated with monoclonal antibodies
against insulin followed by the twofold titration of the latter in buffer
'ID. After 2 h incubation at 37OC the plates were rinsed with buffer "C"
and incubated with laccase conjugate with goat antimouse
immunoglobulins in buffer " A for 1 h at 37OC. The catalytic activity of
immunosorbed enzyme was measured as described above.
Comparison of Absolute Sensitivities of Immunoperoxidase and
Immunolaccase Coniueates
Plates with adsorbed human immunoglobulins were treated with
different concentrations of immunoperoxidase and immunolaccase
conjugates (goat antihuman antibodies conjugated with marker enzyme)
in buffer " A and incubated for 1 h at 37OC following by rinsing of the
plates with buffer "C" and determination of enzymatic activity as
described above.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
orth
Car
olin
a] a
t 11:
28 1
2 N
ovem
ber
2014
3004 SKOROBOGAT'KO ET AL.
The plates with adsorbed rabbit antibodies against human
immunoglobulins were treated with various known concentrations of
human immunoglobulins in buffer 'ID, incubated for 1 h at 37OC rinsed
with buffer "C" and incubated with conjugates of laccase and peroxidase
with antihuman antibodies for 1 h at 37% Catalytic activity of
immunosorbed enzyme was measured as described above.
Definition of the Sensitivity of Dose Response Curves
The sensitivity of dose response curves for enzyme immunoassay
technique was taken as the minimal amount of investigated substances
which gave peroxidase or laccase activities bound significantly above that
non-specifically bound in the absence of investigated substances
(background).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Homogeneous laccase preparation obtained from cultural liquid of
basidial fungi Coriolus hirsutus contained 17% of carbohydrate moieties
per protein molecule as determined by phenol-sulfur method. Thus the
polypeptide/carbohydrate ratic. in laccase (17% for 55,000 total
molecular mass) and peroxidase (11% for 40,000) are practically the
same. For this reason the synthesis of laccase-antibody conjugates was
performed using the non-modified periodate method.
Synthesized conjugates of laccase with different kinds of
antibodies exhibited high enzymatic activity, viz. 75-80% of initial activity
of laccase taken for synthesis. Clearly the oxidation of carbohydrate
moieties of laccase does not lead to significant changes in active site of
the enzyme which could cause a decrease in catalytic activity. Hence the
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
orth
Car
olin
a] a
t 11:
28 1
2 N
ovem
ber
2014
LACCASE 3005
periodate method can be used to synthesize immunolaccase conjugates
with high retention of catalytic activity. Laccase conjugates prepared in
this way retain their immunological and enzymatic activity for at least 1
year when stored in 50% aqueous glycerol at -18OC.
Several authors 13914 showed that immunoperoxidase conjugates
synthesized using periodate method are quite heterogeneous in terms of
molecular mass which is explained probably by the high reactivity of
aldehyde groups formed during the reaction of the enzyme with m-
periodate. However for practical purposes fractionation of heterogeneous
conjugate preparations is not necessary 1 so immunolaccase conjugates
used in our experiments were not subjected to any separation procedures.
As a rule the choice of the type of enzyme immunoassay to be
used is dictated by aims of the investigation. For example the indirect
enzyme immunoassay is usually employed for quantitative determination
of specific antibodies against pathogens in serum l2. Sanctsich enzyme
immunoassay is mostly often used for antigens with several epitops 12 and so on. In this connection we investigated the feasibility of
immunolaccase conjugates in different types of enzyme immunoassay. In
the case of the sandwich enzyme immunoassay the mouse
immunoglobulins were used as antigens whereas rabbit antimouse
antibodies and laccase-bound goat antimouse antibodies were employed
as first and second antibodies respectively. Experimental protocol is
described in details in Materials and Methods. Results are presented in
Fig.1. The data show that this type of immunoassay provides reliable
determination of antigen concentrations as low as 2,5*10-= M which
demonstrates high sensitivity of the immunolaccase conjugate taken at
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
orth
Car
olin
a] a
t 11:
28 1
2 N
ovem
ber
2014
3006
2.0 D
405
I .o
0.0
SKOROBOGAT’KO ET AL.
-12.0 -1 1 -10 -9 -8
Ig DgGl
FIG. 1. Scheme of the sandwich enzyme immunoassay employed for determination of mouse immunoglobulms concentration using laccase conjugates with goat antimouse antibodies. Conjugate concentration - 2 pg/ml, substrate - ABTS, incubation time - 30 min at room temperature.
concentration of 2 yg protein/ml. According to previous reports l5,
similar concentrations of conjugates of alkaline phosphatase and
peroxidase are used in immunoassays based on these marker enzymes.
Owing to recent progress in hybridome technology the least of
widely used techniques has being supplemented with the indirect enzyme
immunoassay which is successfully used for the detection and
quantitative determination of antibodies against bacterial and viral
antigens 12.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
orth
Car
olin
a] a
t 11:
28 1
2 N
ovem
ber
2014
LACCASE 3007
0.75
405
0.60
0.45
0.30
0.15
0.00 I I I I I I
-9.5 -9.0 -8.5 -8.0 -7.5 -7.0
lg [mon ABI
FIG. 2. Calibration curve for determination of monoclonal antibodies against insulin concentration by mean of the indirect enzyme immunoassay. Conjugate concentration - 2 pg/ml, substrate - ABTS, incubation time - 30 min at room temperature.
In the present work this method was used for quantitative
determination of monoclonal antibodies against insulin (see Materials
and Methods for experimental details). The sensitivity of the analysis
was 1 ng of antibodies per sample at the concentration of the detecting
conjugate 2 p g protein/ml (Fig.2). Thus, the suggested reagent can be
successfully used for the hybridome screening as well as for
determination of different antigens such as, Plasmodia, Trypanosoma,
Vibrio cholerae, ect., whose sensitivity of the assay was expressed in
nanomoles of the substance 16.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
orth
Car
olin
a] a
t 11:
28 1
2 N
ovem
ber
2014
3008
1.5
D 405
1
0.5
0.0
SKOROBOGAT’KO ET AL.
-9.5 -8.5 -7.5 -8.5
FIG. 3. Calibration curve for determination of insulin concentration by the competitive enzyme immunoassay. Conjugate concentration - 2 pg/ml, substrate - ABTS, incubation time - 30 min at room temperature.
One of the most sensitive versions of enzyme immunoassay is the
competitive method allowing determination of picogramm amounts of
analytes. However, the specificity of this method is markedly dependent
on the specificity of antibodies used 15. We showed that the competitive
method is applicable for quantitative determination of insulin using the
laccase conjugate with monoclonal antibodies E10A2 (Fig.3). The data
shows that the method provides reliable determination of insulin
concentration as low as 1 ng/ml. Evidently, this is due to the high
specificity of monoclonal antibodies E10A2 which are characterized by
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
orth
Car
olin
a] a
t 11:
28 1
2 N
ovem
ber
2014
LACCASE 3009
405 1'5 1 D
1.0 -
0.5 -
0.0 / I I I I 1
0 50 100 150 200 250
t, min
FIG.4. Time dependence of the accumulation of the chromogenic product during incubation with immunolaccase (1) and immunoperoxidase (2) conjugates. Conjugate concentration - 2 pg/ml, substrate - ABTS, investigations provided at room temperature.
the value of Kd=5*10-10 M 17, It should be mentioned that the
competitive enzyme immunoassay of insulin using monoclonal antibodies
E10A2 and peroxidase as a marker enzyme allows one to determine 3
ng/ml of insulin at immunoperoxidase conjugate concentration 5 pg
protein/ml 17.
A comparative investigation of immunoperoxidase and
immunolaccase conjugates showed (Fig.4) that in the case of laccase the
formation of chromogen during ABTS oxidation is much higher than in
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
orth
Car
olin
a] a
t 11:
28 1
2 N
ovem
ber
2014
3010 SKOROBOGAT'KO ET AL.
D405
0.5
0.0 I -10.5 -9.0 -7.5
lg [IgGl
FIGS. Determination of the human immunoglobulins concentration by sandwich enzyme using conjugates of antihuman IgG withimg::rJ) and antihuman IgG- peroxidase (2). Substrate - ABTS, incubation time - 30 min at room temperature.
the case of peroxidase (i.e., after 120 min incubation the absorbance of
the reaction mixture with laccase was three times higher than that with
peroxidase).
In contrast to peroxidase which forms inactive intermediate
compound in the course of the reaction, laccase is not inhibited by
reaction products 478. Comparison of absolute sensitivities of conjugates
also confirms this conclusion (Fig.5). The data shows that sensitivity
limits for immunolaccase and immunoperoxidase conjugates differ by the
factor of three and are equal to 7.7*10-11 M and 23*10-10 M
respectively.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
orth
Car
olin
a] a
t 11:
28 1
2 N
ovem
ber
2014
LACCASE 301 1
It should be noted that the background oxidation of the
chromogenic substrate is much less pronounced in the presence of
oxygen as compared to hydrogen peroxide. In blank experiments
preincubation of the solid phase with buffer followed by the treatment
with irnmunolaccase reagent lead to an average change in absorbance at
405 nm of 0,l units/h. The data obtained can be explained by the
presence of hydrogen peroxide in the chromogenic mixture used in the
case of peroxidase-catalyzed reaction.
In conclusion laccase from Coriolus hirsutus can be successfully
used as a marker enzyme for enzyme immunoassay. We have confirmed
experimentally advantages of laccase as compared to peroxidase both in
absolute sensitivity of the immunoassay and catalytic properties
demanded from the marker enzyme.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. 6. 7. 8.
9. 10.
11. 12.
13.
REFERENCES T.T. Ngo and H.M. Lenhoff, Eds., in "Enzyme-mediated immunoassay", Mir, Moscow, 1988, 444. BJ. Gould and V. Marks in Monosotopic immunoassay, Acad.Press, N-Y, 1988, 3. E. Ishikava, S. Hashida, T. Kohno, K. Tanaka in Monosotopic immunoassay, Acad.Press, N-Y, 1988, 27. B. Porstman, T. Porstman in Monosotopic immunoassay, Acad.Press, N-Y, 1988, 57. J.H. Bovaird, T.T. Ngo, Clinchem., 2, 2423, (1982). A.M. Mauer, E. Harel, Phytochem., a, 193, (1979). A.M.Mauer, Phytochem., 26, 11, (1978). A.L. Ghindilis, E.O. Zhazhina, YuA. Baranov, A.I. Yaropolov, VS. Gavrilova, Biokhimiya, 53, 735, (1988). C. Blake and B.Y. Jould, Bich.Bioph.Res.Commun, m, 533, (1984). BAL. Hurn and S.M. Chantler, Methods in Enzymology, 70, 104, (1980). Y.L. Palmer and A. Nisonoff, Biochem.2, 863, (1964). PX. Nakane and A. Kawaio, J.Histochem.Cytochern., 22, 1084, (1974). S. Avrames, T. Ternynck and J.L. Guesdon, ScandJ.Immunol., 8, 7, (1978).
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
orth
Car
olin
a] a
t 11:
28 1
2 N
ovem
ber
2014
3012 SKOROBOGAT’KO ET AL.
14. A. Yu. Karulin, B.B. Dzantiev, A.V. Zherdev, A.M. Egorov,
15. A. Jeanson, J.-M. Cloes, Bouchet M. and T. Reirtier,
16. 17. T.V. Cherednikova, M.Yu. Rubtsova, M.V. Demcheva, E.M.
Biotekhnologiya, I, 324, (1989).
J.Immunol.Methods, 111, 261, (1988). A. Voller and D. de Savigny, J.Immunol.Methods, &, 1, (1981).
Gavrilova, A.M. Egorov, Biotekhnologiya, 5, 612, (1989).
Received June 15, 1994 Accepted July 31 , 1994
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f N
orth
Car
olin
a] a
t 11:
28 1
2 N
ovem
ber
2014