king edward memorial park foreshore community liaison ... · pdf fileking edward memorial park...
TRANSCRIPT
King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore
Community Liaison Working Group
5 June 2017
2
CONTENTS
Progress report
Upcoming works
Focus on hoarding works
Focus on sheet piling
Mitigation
LBTH presentation
Permanent and temporary artwork
3
KEMPF
4
Playground
5
Site hoarding
6
Upcoming works
7
Focus on hoarding works
Free Trade
Wharf
KEMPF Site
8
Site hoarding
9
Cofferdam Impact Piling Works
• Total Number of Piles: 278
• Total Number of Driven Piles: 45 approx. (16%)
• Average amount of driving time per pile: 17 Minutes continuous
• Average amount of driving time per pile: 22 Minutes intermittent
• 1600 hours of general piling works, with approximately 13 hours of impact piling
• June, 2 Piles
• July, 9 Piles
• Aug, 12 Piles
• Sep, 6 Piles
• Oct, 2 Piles
• Nov, 2 Piles
• Dec, 10 Piles
Indicative
10
Cofferdam – Chambers Wharf
11
Noise and Vibration – Best Practice
‘Super silent’ generators Giken Super crush
Re-designed pressure
washersAcoustic panels
12
Shadwell Basin – slipway
13
Mitigation
14
Mitigation
• ‘Special Case’ procedure – Non-statutory off-site mitigation &
compensation policy
• ‘Standard Case’ procedure – discretionary offer made by Tideway
15
Special Case Procedure
• ‘Special Case’ procedure is in accordance with the Non-statutory off-site mitigation and compensation policy.
• Offers a mechanism for residents to apply for additional mitigation if they have special circumstances which are exacerbated by exposure to the effects of construction, eg.noise and/or vibration.
• Special circumstances could include night shift workers, vulnerable persons who are housebound or those with a recognised medical condition.
• Mitigation could include:- secondary glazing for habitable rooms, eg living rooms or bedrooms
- respite periods away from the works during more intrusive construction activities or,
- temporary rehousing for the duration of the construction works.
• Special circumstances could also include those who have a demonstrable loss as a direct result of the construction, e.g loss of rent or business.
• All Special Case applications are assessed by the Independent Compensation Panel (ICP) and are assessed individually on a case by case basis.
16
Special Case Procedure – How To Apply
• Apply and make yourself known to the project, either by email,
phone or verbally to one of the team.
Email - helpdesk@tideway-london
Phone – 08000 30 80 80
• Tideway’s TAPs and Mitigation Lead will contact you and talk you
through the process, either over the phone or in person.
• Your application needs to include:
- Clear statement / description of how the works are affecting you.
- Supporting documentation eg. evidence of being a nightshift worker, or
evidence from a GP or medical consultant
- Clear identification of what specific mitigation you are applying for, e.g
secondary glazing, temporary respite / rehousing etc.
• Your supporting documentation will then be reviewed by the
Independent Compensation Panel (ICP).
17
Standard Case procedure
• New mitigation procedure which will run in parallel to the existing Special Case & TAPs mitigation
• Discretionary offer by Tideway available for days when impact piling of cofferdam sheet piles at King Edward Memorial Park Foreshore site may occur.
• Qualifying residents can select mitigation without needing to submit an application to be considered a Special Case by the Independent Compensation Panel (ICP).
• Only for impact piling days, not available for days when sheet piles are installed by push piling or vibration piling.
• Impact piling days will be notified in advance by email.
• In order to qualify for the Standard Case mitigation, residents must fulfil both the following criteria:
a) Residents must permanently live within the Geographical Area, and
b) Residents must have one of the identified Characteristics
• The new Standard Case procedure was initially developed for Chambers Wharf site with input from the local agencies.
• Only available to residential, not available to commercial properties.
18
Standard Case – Geographical Area
Geographical Area For Standard Case Zone – Version dated 5th June 2017
Standard Case Zone
Approximate Cofferdam
19
Standard Case – Characteristics
• In order to qualify for the Standard Case, residents must fulfil at
least one of the following criteria:
• Residents with children of a pre-school age
• Residents with children of a school age
• Residents in full time education who live at the property during term
time
• Residents who are over state retirement age and are fully retired
• Residents who have retired early due to ill health
• Residents who work from home
• Residents with a recognised medical condition.
20
Standard Case – Mitigation Available
• If a resident permanently lives within the Geographical Area and
they fulfil one of the specified characteristics, then they can select
one of the following discretionary mitigation offer for impact piling
days:
1. Daily Daytime Respite Payment – daily payment to assist resident to go out if they so wish
2. Temporary Office / Working Space – For those who work from home
• Should a resident request alternative mitigation not listed above
(such as respite with overnight accommodation or temporary
rehousing), then they would need to make an application to be
considered a ‘Special Case’.
21
Standard Case – Next steps
• Residents within the Geographical Area will receive a letter in the
near future.
• Tideway have appointed a Case Support Adviser to assist residents
in applying to be a Standard Case and advising what mitigation is
available.
• Residents outside the Geographical Area can still apply to be
considered a ‘Special Case’ but their case will need to be assessed
by the ICP.
Primary Legislation
Act of Parliament
Planning Act 2008
Secondary Legislation
Secretaries of State
The Thames Water Utilities Limited
(Thames Tideway Tunnel) Order 2014
(S.106 Legal Agreement)
Approved Plans Requirements
Project Wide and Site Specific
Example:
• PW6 (Project Wide 6): Works to be
implemented in accordance with:
Code of Construction Practice Part A
Coder of Construction Practice Part B
Schedule 17
Procedure for
discharge of
Requirements
Draft Submission
28 days – Site
Notice
Main Submission
8 Weeks
History of the Tideway DCO
• October 2010 – Phase 1 consultation
• May 2011 - CABE Sketch Review
• June 2011 – CABE Scheme Review
• February 2012 – Phase 2 Consultation
• February 2013- Date of submission
• September 2013 - Examination Begins
• September 2014 – Order approved by the Secretary of
State
Summary of Project Wide and Site Specific
Requirements
Project Wide Requirements Site Specific Requirements
PW1: Interpretations/definitions KEMPF1: CoCP Part B
PW2: Time Limits KEMPF2: Location of permanent works
PW3: Phasing of the authorised development – Project wide KEMPF3: Detailed design approval for permanent above-ground structures
PW4: Phasing of the Authorised Development KEMPF4: Detailed design approval for signature ventilation columns
PW5: Drive Strategy KEMPF5: Detailed design approval for river wall and foreshore structure
PW6: CoCP Part A KEMPF6: Landscaping works
PW7: Air Management Plan KEMPF7: Works to reconfigure the multi-purpose sports pitch, relocated the
children’s play area and associated landscaping
PW8: Monitoring of and protective works to listed buildings and structures KEMPF8: Temporary works platform
PW9: Built heritage recording KEMPF9: Contaminated Land
PW10: Signage for temporary footpath diversions KEMPF10: Archaeology
PW11: Interpretation strategy KEMPF11: Construction Traffic Management Plan
PW12 Excavated material and waste KEMFP12: Travel Plan
PW13: Groundwater and dewatering monitoring and management KEMPF13: Specification of accesses (construction and operational)
PW14: Operational Noise KEMPF14: Surface water drainage
PW15: River Transport Strategy KEMPF15: Highway works
PW16: Completion of construction KEMPF16: Section 106 Agreement / Undertaking
PW17: Noise and vibration trigger values KEMPF17: Commissioning Works
PW18: Notice of maintenance works KEMPF18: Working Hours
PW19: Baseline Monitoring
Extract of the DCO
Drawing NumbersRequirements
Adam Hussain
Senior Planning Officer
London Borough of Tower Hamlets
27
Permanent and Temporary Artwork
28
Hoarding Commission
The Process
• Following an open call, the three shortlisted artists visited the site prior to
developing their proposals.
• The selection panel was held on 22 February. A representative from the
Community Liaison Working Group (CLWG) participated, along with
representatives from Tideway and CVB (the Main Works Contractor) and
LB Tower Hamlets.
The Proposal
• Artists Matheson Marcault (Holly Gramazio and Sophie Sampson) are
working with local community groups to develop a series of games that can
be played in the park and the surrounding area. The rules for these games
are being developed into a visually striking design for the hoarding area
adjacent to the play area and tennis courts.
Games for specific landscaping in the park
Games which reference sport
31
Hoarding Commission
Methodology / Community involvement
• During April and May the artists met and worked with five different local
groups. Workshops included discussions, game creation and development,
as well as playing games previously developed by Matheson Marcault.
• So far they have worked with:
- young children from Ideas Store Watney Market
- older people from Prime Time Club, Ideas Store Watney Market
- children and young people at Shadwell Basin Outdoor Activity Centre
- children from St Peter’s After School Club
- young people from The Rooted Forum girl’s youth group at Tarling East
Community Centre
• The artists have also met the Tennis Manager to discuss how players might
use and interact with the hoarding adjacent to the tennis courts.
32
Hoarding Commission
Methodology / Community involvement
• Following the workshops, Holly and Sophie have developed and tried out
games that fit several different themes including games about nature,
monsters and colours.
• The games are simple physical games that can be played on your own or in
small groups, with no special equipment. For example:
- COLOUR SPOTS: When you're about to leave, pick two colours - say, blue and
orange. One player looks for blue things; the other looks for orange. Who can spot
the most things in their colour before you leave the park?
- MONSTER HUNTER: Choose your favourite monster! [image showing a selection
of 8-10 monsters]. Make a face to copy that monster - can everyone else guess
which monster you picked?
Programme
• They will continue with play testing the games on Wednesday 7 June
between 16:00 and 17:00. The games and instructions will be formed into
visual imagery for the hoarding. Installation is anticipated in June.
• The initial designs will be shared with the CLWG and a launch event held
once installed.
33
34
East: The Shipping Parishes – Gateway to the World
Site Narrative: Sailortown, international diaspora and
progressive politics
36
Permanent Integrated Commission
The Selection Process
• The selection panel was held on the 26 January – representatives were
invited from LBTH (unable to attend due to prior engagement) and the
CLWG (no response), a representative from a local arts organisation
attended with Tideway staff.
• The site specific narratives of the HIS relate to the close historical links with
mercantile and dock communities that have been associated with the
contrasting impact of former British maritime power and trading empire on
different ethnic, social and economic groups, locally and internationally.
Artist & Proposal
• Hew Locke, an artist with an international profile, has been appointed. His
proposal comprises a series of unique cast bronze boats representative of
the history of the Thames and shifting population of the East End, placed
on low plinths around the foreshore site. Creating a trail through the
foreshore site, linking the new public realm with the park.
• These currently include: a Tug, Chinese Junk, Thames 19th Century
Paddle Cruiser, John Hawkins (slave ship), Thames Barge and a
Bangladeshi river boat.
37
Hew Locke - Previous Work
38
Permanent Integrated Commission
Methodology and Community Involvement
• Hew has been gathering information on the appropriate heritage of the
boats, their decoration and symbolism. Histories will be suggested by
specific decorative details and cargos which has been the focus of his
consultation.
• Hew has undertaken significant research with guilds and companies
(Watermen & Lightermen, Hudson Co, East India Company, Thames Iron
Works), history from the Elizabethan period – including the various waves
of immigration and different diaspora groups in the area.
• Further research includes visits to St Matthias Church (built by the East
India Co.), St John’s Churchyard Wapping and its sailors’ gravestones, and
St Paul’s Church Shadwell where Captain Cook worshipped.
• Hew has met with and consulted: the Maritime Museum and Museum of
London; the Boitok Group (St Hilda’s East Community Centre), the
Coriander Club (Spitalfields City Farm) and the Chinese Association.
• Future consultation is planned with the Hermitage Community Moorings
and Tarling East Community Centre.
42
Permanent Integrated Commission
Design and Approval Process and Timeline
• May/June/July: Design development – creating drawings of the plinths and
drawings, maquettes and collages of the surface details for the sculptures;
security, accessibility and associated costs
• 12th June: Design Council Cabe design review
• June/July/August: further detailed artwork development.
• Completion of design work in September.
• The artwork forms part of the project planning application
• The timescale for fabrication and installation has yet to be confirmed.
Future Community Engagement
• Hew is looking at ways for future engagement during the fabrication stage,
the casting of the bronze, and post installation.