kamloops.#2.nov.2012

33
Putting the Big Literacy Ideas to Work in Primary Classrooms Kamloops Tuesday, October 30 th , 2012 Tuesday, November 27 th , 2012 Faye Brownlie

Upload: faye-brownlie

Post on 13-Jan-2015

148 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

2nd half day session for teams of educators from schools. Developing readers in primary classrooms: research and practice.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

Putting the Big Literacy Ideas to Work in Primary Classrooms

Kamloops  Tuesday,  October  30th,  2012  Tuesday,  November  27th,  2012  

Faye  Brownlie  

Page 2: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

Learning Intentions •  I  can  find  evidence  of  current  reading  research  and  the  big  ideas  of  literacy  in  my  pracEce  and  become  curious  about  incorporaEng  a  pracEce  that  is  different  to  me  

•  I  can  consider  the  impact  of  my  language  on  my  learning  community  

•  I  am  leaving  with  a  quesEon  and  a  plan  

Page 3: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

1.  Every  child  reads  something  he  or  she  chooses.  2.  Every  child  reads  accurately.  3.  Every  child  reads  something  he  or  she  

understands.  4.  Every  child  writes  about  something  personally  

meaningful.  5.  Every  child  talks  with  peers  about  reading  and  

wriEng.  6.  Every  child  listens  to  a  fluent  adult  read  aloud.  

Page 4: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

•  What would happen if…

•  Belief •  Practice

Page 5: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

We  now  have  good  evidence  that  virtually  every  child  who  enters  an  American  kindergarten  can  be  reading  on  level  by  the  end  of  first  grade  (Mathes,  et  al,  2004;  Phillips  &  Smith,  2010;  VelluEno,  et  al,  1996).    

-­‐Richard  Allington,  keynote  address,  IRA,  2011  

Page 6: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

98% on grade level at year end:  Mathes,  et  al  (2004);  VelluEno,  et  al  (1996);  

Phillips,  et  al  (1998)  

•  Every  successful  intervenEon  study  used  either  1-­‐1  expert  tutoring  or  1-­‐3  very  small  group  expert  reading  instrucEon.    

•  None  of  the  studies  used  a  scripted  reading  program.    

•  All  had  students  engaged  in  reading  2/3  of  the  lesson.    

Page 7: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

-­‐grades  1  and  2  –  60  minutes  reading,  30  minutes  on  skill  

-­‐aim  for  your  kids  to  read  6  books  in  school  and  6  more  a`er  school  

Page 8: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

High Success Reading •  99%  accuracy  •  Reading  in  phrases  •  90%  comprehension  

Page 9: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

Only  1  out  of  153  beginning  reading  programs  made  a  difference  in  achievement.  

*If  the  program  is  not  listed,  there  is  no  reliable  research  to  support  it.    R.  Allington,  2012  

What  Works  Clearinghouse,  as  quoted  in  EducaEon  Week,  August  15,  2007  

Page 10: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

The  struggling  reader,  no  mader  what  grade  the  child  is  in,  has  not  built  an  efficient  reading  process  system  to  make  meaning  from  texts  or  help  him  or  her  solve  problems  when  stuck…  

For  teachers,  that  means  learning  how  to  teach  in  support  of  the  child  as  he  or  she  gains  more  control  of  strategic  acEons.            -­‐Johnson  &  Keier  

Page 11: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

Did  that  make  sense?  

Page 12: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

How  did  you  figure  that  out?  

Page 13: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

M  –  meaning  

Does  this  make  sense?  

S  –  language  structure  Does  this  sound  right?  

V  –  visual  informaEon  Does  this  look  right?  

Page 14: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

The  best  way  to  develop  phonemic  segmentaEon  is  through  invented  spelling;  children  with  pens  and  pencils,  drawing  and  wriEng.  

 -­‐Marilyn  Adams,  1990  

-­‐about  20%  of  children  do  not  develop  phonemic  segmentaEon  readily  

Page 15: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

•  K/1  –    spend  a  maximum  of  10  minutes/day  on  phonics  –  small  impact  on  phonic  knowledge;  no  difference  on  comprehension  

•  Beyond  grade  1  –  no  staEsEcal  difference  for  any  phonics    

•  NaEonal  Reading  Panel  

Page 16: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

Worksheets  

•  Don’t  underesEmate  the  child’s  capacity.    

•  How  complex  is  this  task?  

•  Is  this  making  meaning  or  matching  thinking?  

Page 17: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

Teach Content to All  

 Learning in Safe Schools, 2nd ed. - Brownlie, King, 2011"

Page 18: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

Model Guided practice Independent practice Independent application  

Pearson  &  Gallagher  (1983)  

Page 19: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

Think  Aloud:      Students  need  

•  A  model  •  Guided  pracEce  in  following  the  model  

•  An  opportunity  to  pracEce  the  strategy,  with  support  as  needed  

•  Choice  in  the  degree  of  complexity  they  use  to  complete  the  task  

Page 20: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

Sea  Oder  Pup  

Page 21: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

Sea  Oder  Pup  -­‐  Victoria  Miles  (Orca)  

There  is  a  forest  of  seaweed  in  the  ocean.      

It  is  a  forest  of  kelp.    At  the  bodom  of  the  

 kelp  forest,  Mother  sea  oder  searches  for  

 food.  

Page 22: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

High  above,  her  pup  is  waiEng.    He  is  

 wrapped  in  a  piece  of  kelp  so  he  can’t  

 dri`  away  while  Mother  is  down    below.  

Page 23: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

Gr. 3 Writing: Model – a small moment Establish criteria Kids write Descriptive feedback on

criteria  Pearson  &  Gallagher  (1983)  

Learning Intention: I can write and describe a small event from my morning.

Page 24: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

•  Choose a topic •  Write in front of the students •  Students describe ‘what works’ in your writing •  Students choose a ‘morning’ topic •  Students write •  Students self-assess •  Students meet with peers to share and provide

feedback

Page 25: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

All  alone,  I  stepped  into  my  car.    With  my  map  in  hand,  I  began  to  drive.    At  the  lights  I  turned  le`,  then  the  map  said  to  turn  right.    “Oh,  no!”      The  sign  said,  “Road  closed”.          “Help,”  I  thought.    “What  am  I  going  to  do?”  

Page 26: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

Notices…criteria •  Mystery

•  Opening

•  Detailed

•  Sounds like you (Voice)

Page 27: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012
Page 28: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012
Page 29: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012
Page 30: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

No plan, no point

Page 31: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

Professional Collaboration •  InteracEve  and  on-­‐going  process  •  Mutually  agreed  upon  challenges  

•  Capitalizes  on  different  experEse,  knowledge  and  experience  

•  Roles  are  blurred  •  Mutual  trust  and  respect  

•  Create  and  deliver  targeted  instrucEon  •  GOAL:    beder  meet  the  needs  of  diverse  learners  

Page 32: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

Goal:  

to  support  students  in  working  effecEvely  in  the  classroom  environment  

Page 33: Kamloops.#2.nov.2012

The Class Review  

What are the strengths of the class?

What are your concerns about the class as a whole?

What are your main goals for the class this year?

What are the individual needs in your class?