jpet fast forward. published on june 3, 2005 as doi:10...

33
JPET #89284 1 Modulation of Ca 2+ Channels by ORL1 Receptors Natively Expressed in Rat Stellate Ganglion Neurons Innervating Cardiac Muscle Victor Ruiz-Velasco, Henry L. Puhl, Brad C. Fuller, and Andrew D. Sumner Department of Anesthesiology (V.R.-V) Department of Medicine (A.D.S.) Penn State College of Medicine Hershey, PA 17033-0850 Laboratory of Molecular Physiology (H.L.P.) National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Bethesda, MD 20892-8155 and Guthrie Vascular Laboratories (B.C.F.) Guthrie Healthcare System Sayre, PA 18840 JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10.1124/jpet.105.089284 Copyright 2005 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284 at ASPET Journals on July 5, 2020 jpet.aspetjournals.org Downloaded from

Upload: others

Post on 24-Jun-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

1

Modulation of Ca2+ Channels by ORL1 Receptors Natively Expressed in Rat Stellate Ganglion

Neurons Innervating Cardiac Muscle

Victor Ruiz-Velasco, Henry L. Puhl, Brad C. Fuller, and Andrew D. Sumner

Department of Anesthesiology (V.R.-V)

Department of Medicine (A.D.S.)

Penn State College of Medicine

Hershey, PA 17033-0850

Laboratory of Molecular Physiology (H.L.P.)

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism

Bethesda, MD 20892-8155

and

Guthrie Vascular Laboratories (B.C.F.)

Guthrie Healthcare System

Sayre, PA 18840

JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10.1124/jpet.105.089284

Copyright 2005 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 2: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

2

Running Title:

ORL1 receptors in SG neurons couple to Ca2+ channels

Address for Correspondence:

Victor Ruiz-Velasco, Ph.D.

Department of Anesthesiology, H187

Penn State College of Medicine

Hershey, PA, 17033-0850, USA

Phone: 717-531-6076

FAX: 717-531-6221

e-mail: [email protected]

No. of Text Pages: 26; No. of Tables: 0; No. of Figures: 5; No. of References: 40;

No. of Words in Abstract: 227; No. of Words in Introduction: 365;

No. of Words in Discussion: 1402

Abbreviations: SG, stellate ganglion; ORL1, opioid receptor-like 1; Noc, nociceptin; NE,

norepinephrine; VIP, vasoactive intestinal peptide; UFP-101, [Nphe1,Arg14,Lys15]N/OFQ-NH2;

Deltorphin, [Ala2]-deltorphin II; U-50488, trans-(-)-3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-

pyrrolidinyl)cyclohexyl]benzeneacetamide hydrochloride; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor;

PTX, pertussis toxin; DiI, 1,1’-didodecyl-3,3,3’,3’-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate;

TEA-OH, tetraethylammonium hydroxide; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

Recommended Section: Cellular and Molecular

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 3: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

3

Abstract

Postganglionic sympathetic nerve terminals innervate cardiac muscle and express ORL1

receptors, the most recently described member of the opioid receptor subclass. ORL1 receptors

are stimulated by the endogenous heptadecapeptide nociceptin (Noc). To better understand how

the signaling events by Noc regulate sympathetic neuron excitability, the goal of the present

study was to determine whether sympathetic stellate ganglion (SG) neurons, innervating the

heart, natively express ORL1 opioid receptors and couple to Ca2+ channels. SG neurons in adult

male rats were retrograde labeled with a fluorescent tracer via injection of the ventricular muscle

employing ultrasound imaging. Thereafter, N-type Ca2+ channel modulation was investigated

using the whole-cell variant of the patch-clamp technique. Exposure of labeled SG neurons to

Noc resulted in a concentration-dependent inhibition of Ca2+ currents (with an estimated EC50 of

193 ± 14 nM). Preexposure of SG neurons to the ORL1 receptor blocker, UFP-101, significantly

decreased the Noc-mediated Ca2+ current inhibition. The Ca2+ current inhibition was also

blocked by pertussis toxin pretreatment, indicating that signaling occurs via Gαi/o G proteins.

Finally, the full-length ORL1 receptor cDNA in SG neurons was cloned and sequenced. Of the

two known alternatively spliced variants in rats, sequencing analysis showed that the ORL1

receptor expressed in SG neurons is the short form. Overall, these results suggest that stimulation

of post-synaptic ORL1 receptors by Noc in SG neurons regulates cardiac sympathetic activity.

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 4: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

4

Introduction

The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor and the three ‘classical’ opioid receptor subtypes

(mu, kappa and delta) are members of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily. The

heptadecapeptide nociceptin, (Noc, also known as orphanin/FQ) is the endogenous ORL1

receptor ligand. ORL1 receptors are coupled to members of the pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive

Gαi/o G protein family. Stimulation of ORL1 receptors by Noc results in inhibition of voltage-

gated Ca2+ channels, activation of G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K+ channels, and negative

coupling to adenylyl cyclases (for review, see New and Wong, 2002).

Although the ORL1 receptor-nociceptin system is known to be involved in pain transmission

in the central nervous system (Meunier et al., 2000), recent evidence has shown that opioid

receptors are widely distributed in the peripheral nervous system and are capable of eliciting

potent cardiovascular responses (for review, see Kapusta 2000; Malinowska et al., 2002). Noc,

for example, evokes a decrease in arterial blood pressure and heart rate when administered

intracerebroventricularly, intrathecally or intravenously (Giuliani et al., 1997a; Salis et al., 2000;

Giuliani et al., 2000; Hashiba et al., 2003). Noc has also been found to exert an inhibitory

neuromodulation on transmitter release in the heart (Giuliani and Maggi, 1997b) and blood

vessels (Bucher 1998; Malinowska et al., 2000). These studies suggest that the presence of

ORL1 receptors in the central and peripheral nervous systems regulates cardiac function by

modulating autonomic neurotransmission (e.g. inhibition of norepinephrine, NE, release).

Increases in both blood pressure and heart rate, observed following electrical stimulation of

preganglionic cardiac efferent sympathetic nerve fibers, were inhibited by Noc in a dose-

dependent manner (Malinowska et al., 2001). This response was shown to occur through the

stimulation of ORL1 receptors located presynaptically on the postganglionic sympathetic nerve

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 5: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

5

endings. Postganglionic neurons arising from the stellate ganglion (SG) provide the main

sympathetic innervation to the heart and play a significant role in regulating cardiac function

(Wallis et al., 1996). Accordingly, the purpose of the present study was to determine whether SG

neurons, innervating cardiac muscle, possess ORL1 receptors and to examine the signal

transduction pathways involved in Ca2+ channel modulation. In addition, the identification of the

ORL1 receptor splice variant expressed in SG neurons was explored.

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 6: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

6

Methods

Stellate ganglion (SG) labeling and isolation

All experimental procedures performed were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and

Use Committee (IACUC) at Penn State College of Medicine and conformed to the guidelines of

the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Stellate

ganglion (SG) neurons were retrograde labeled employing ultrasound imaging as described

previously (Fuller et al., 2004). Briefly, adult male Wistar rats (225-450 g) were anesthetized

with intraperitoneal administration of ketamine HCl (75 mg/kg) and xylazine (5 mg/kg). The

heart was ultrasonographically imaged using either a Sonoline Sienna or Sequoia C256

Echocardiography system (Siemens Medical Solutions, Mountain View, CA) equipped with a

7.5 or 14 MHz probe, respectively. Thereafter, under echocardiographic guidance, either True

Blue (2.5% in H2O, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) or DiIC12(3) (1,1’-didodecyl-3,3,3’,3’-

tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate, 1% in DMSO, Molecular Probes) was injected into the

ventricular muscle employing a syringe with a 30 gauge needle. The total volume injected

ranged from 50 to 100 µl.

Five to 12 days following dye injection the rats were sacrificed by CO2 anesthesia and

decapitated. The SG was removed and cleared of connective tissue in cold Hanks’ balanced salt

solution. Thereafter, the SG was incubated for 60 min in a shaking water bath at 35oC in Earle’s

balanced salt solution with 0.6 mg/ml collagenase Type D (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis,

IN), 0.4 mg/ml trypsin (Worthington Biochemicals, Freehold, NJ) and 0.1 mg/ml DNase Type I

(Sigma, St. Louis, MO). After the incubation period, the cells were dissociated in a culture flask

by vigorous shaking and the dispersed neurons were centrifuged twice for 6 min at 50 X g and

resuspended in minimal essential medium (MEM; Gibco, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10%

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 7: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

7

fetal calf serum, 1% glutamine and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution (Gibco). Neurons were

then plated into 35 mm tissue culture plates coated with poly-L-lysine and stored in a humidified

incubator containing 5% CO2 in air at 37oC.

Fluorescence images of DiI-labeled neurons were captured with an Orca-ER 1394 cooled

CCD camera (Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Japan) and IPLab software (Scanalytics, Fairfax, VA)

on an inverted microscope (TE2000, Nikon, Japan) equipped with an epifluorescence unit and G-

2E/C filter set (Nikon) containing an excitation filter at 540 + 12 nm, a dichroic beam splitter of

565 nm (long pass) and an emission filter at 620 + 30 nm.

Electrophysiology and data analysis

For electrophysiological recordings, labeled cells were identified with an inverted

microscope (Diaphot 300, Nikon) equipped with an epifluorescence unit and G-2E/C and UV/2A

(excitation filter at 355 + 25 nm, dichroic mirror cut-on at 400 nm long pass and emission filter

at 420 nm, long pass, Nikon) filter cube sets for DiI and True Blue, respectively.

Ca2+ currents were recorded at room temperature (21-24°C) employing the whole-cell

patch-clamp technique. The pipettes were pulled from borosilicate glass capillaries (Corning

7052; Garner Glass, Claremont, CA) on a Flaming-Brown (P-97) micropipette puller (Sutter

Instrument Co., San Rafael, CA), coated with Sylgard (Dow Corning, Midland, MI) and fire

polished. Whole-cell currents were acquired with a patch-clamp amplifier (Axopatch 1-C, Axon

Instruments, Foster City, CA), analog filtered at 5-10 kHz (-3 dB; 4-pole Bessel) and digitized

using custom designed software (S4) on a Power PC computer (Power Computing Corp., Austin,

TX) equipped with a 16-bit analog-to-digital converter board (ITC16, Instrutech Corp., Elmont,

NY). Cell membrane capacitance and series resistance (80-85%) were electronically

compensated. Data and statistical analyses were performed with the Igor Pro (Lake Oswego, OR)

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 8: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

8

and Prism 4 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA) software packages, respectively.

Changes in Ca2+ currents were assessed using a standard t-test. P < 0.05 was considered

statistically significant. Graphs and current traces were produced with the Igor Pro and Canvas

(Deneba Software, Miami, FL) software packages.

The pipette solution contained (mM): 120 N-methyl-D-glucamine, 20 tetraethylammonium

hydroxide (TEA-OH), 11 EGTA, 10 HEPES, 10 sucrose, 1 CaCl2, 4 Mg-ATP, 0.3 Na2ATP, and

14 tris creatine phosphate. The pH was adjusted to 7.2 with methanesulfonic acid and HCl (20

mM) and the osmolality was 296–302 mosmol/kg. The external solution consisted of (mM): 145

TEA-OH, 10 HEPES, 15 glucose, 10 CaCl2, and 0.0003 tetrodotoxin (TTX). The pH was

adjusted to 7.4 with methanesulfonic acid and the osmolality was 317–323 mosmol/kg.

The concentration-response curve for Noc was determined by sequential application of

increasing concentrations of the agonist. In order to avoid effects of desensitization by Noc, no

more than 3 concentrations were tested in each cell and electrophysiological recordings from

neighboring cells were avoided. In most cases, prior to the end of the recordings 3 µM Noc (e.g.

3rd application) was applied to obtain the maximal Ca2+ current inhibition. In this set of

experiments, a sequential application of Noc was not performed until the Ca2+ current amplitude

returned to the control value. The results were pooled and each point represents the mean ± SEM.

The concentration-response curve was fit to the Hill equation: I = 1/[1 +(k/[Noc])n] where I is the

normalized Ca2+ current inhibition, k is a constant, [Noc] is Noc concentration and n is Hill

factor.

Solutions and drugs

Stock solutions of Noc, [D-Ala2]-deltorphin II, U-50488 and endomorphin-1 (all from Tocris

Cookson, Ellisville, MO) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, Phoenix Pharmaceuticals,

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 9: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

9

Belmont, CA) were prepared as stock solutions in H20 and diluted to their final concentration

just prior to use. Pertussis toxin (PTX, List Biological Laboratories, Inc., Campbell, CA) was

prepared in H20 and added to the culture medium (12-20 h) at a final concentration of 500 ng/ml.

UFP-101, a kind gift from Dr. Giro Calo, was also prepared in H20 and applied via the perfusion

system at least 10 minutes before seal formation and maintained for the duration of the

experiment. Drug application to the cells under study was performed by placing a custom-

designed gravity-fed perfusion system approximately 100 µm from the neuron.

Isolation of the full-length rat ORL1 receptor cDNA

Total RNA was isolated from SG obtained from adult Wistar rats, described above.

Thereafter, total RNA was purified with the RNeasy® miniprep kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA).

Approximately 1 µg of total RNA was used to generate oligo dT primed first strand cDNA using

the Advantage™ RT for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kit (Clontech, BD Biosciences, Palo

Alto, CA). Primers for the full length PCR were generated based on the ORL1 receptor sequence

from GenBank Acc# NM_031569. The primers used were: 5’- GAT CGG ATC CAC CAT GGA

GTC CCT CTT TCC TGC TC and 3’- GAT CCT CGA GTC ATG CTG GCC GTG GTA CTG

TC. The restriction enzyme sites for BamHI and XhoI were added to the N and C terminal

primers, respectively. The full length ORL1 receptor PCR product was generated using Pfu

Turbo® DNA polymerase (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and subcloned with the Zero Blunt®

TOPO® PCR Cloning Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Positive clones were sequenced

employing BigDye® terminators (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and ABI 377 DNA

sequencer (Applied Biosystems). The nucleotide sequence was deposited in GenBank

(AY152731).

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 10: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

10

Results

The purpose of the present study was to examine the functional coupling of Ca2+ channels

and ORL1 receptors in SG neurons innervating rat heart muscle. In this subpopulation of

neurons, N-type Ca2+ channel subtypes contribute greater than 50% of the total Ca2+ currents in

rats (Kukwa et al., 1998; Fuller et al., 2004). Rat sympathetic SG neurons were retrograde

labeled employing ultrasound guided dye injection in order to circumvent surgical procedures

(Fuller et al., 2004). Figure 1A and B show the phase and fluorescence image of SG neurons

acutely dissociated from a rat which had been injected with the fluorescent tracer DiI in the heart

six days prior to cell isolation. Figure 1B illustrates that one of the three neurons shown has been

effectively labeled with DiI.

The initial set of experiments was performed to determine the opioid receptor subtypes

expressed in SG neurons. Figure 2A shows the time course of peak Ca2+ current of a labeled SG

neuron exposed to three opioid receptor subtype agonists. Traces representing the responses are

shown in Figure 2B. Cells were held at -80 mV and the test pulse was changed to +10 mV for 50

ms every ten seconds. Application of the selective mu (µ) opioid receptor agonist endomorphin I

(10 µM) did not elicit a response from the cell (Figure 2A and B). On the other hand, exposure of

3 µM Noc led to approximately a 75% inhibition of Ca2+ currents. Finally, bath application of the

kappa (κ) opioid receptor agonist U-50488 (10 µM) caused a Ca2+ current inhibition of nearly

10% (Figure 2A and B). The summarized results plotted in Figure 2C also show that the delta (δ)

opioid receptor agonist Deltorphin II (2 µM) did not lead to significant inhibition of Ca2+

currents. These results suggest that the soma of SG neurons do not natively express the three

classical opioid receptors and that a reproducible (all 8 neurons tested) and robust inhibitory

response of Ca2+ currents can be recorded following Noc exposure.

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 11: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

11

The next set of experiments was undertaken to determine the concentration-response

relationship for Noc-stimulated ORL1 Ca2+ current inhibition in labeled SG neurons. The Ca2+

currents were recorded as described for figure 2A. Figure 3A and 3B illustrate that exposure of

0.03 and 1 µM Noc caused a 7 and 75% inhibition of Ca2+ currents, respectively. The Noc

concentration-response curve is shown in Figure 3C. Results are expressed as Ca2+ current

inhibition (normalized to 3 µM Noc) plotted against log [nociceptin] and then fitted using the

Hill equation. The estimated EC50 was 193 ± 14 nM (n = 3-13 neurons).

Next, the ability of the selective ORL1 receptor antagonist UFP-101 (Calo et al., 2002) to

affect the coupling of Ca2+ channels with ORL1 receptors was tested. Neurons were preincubated

for at least 10 minutes with 10 µM UFP-101 prior to Noc (1 µM) application. Figure 3D is a

summary comparing the Ca2+ current inhibition in cells exposed to either Noc or Noc + UFP-

101. Under control conditions, Noc caused a mean Ca2+ current inhibition of 70 ± 3% (SEM, n

=4) inhibition. On the other hand, UFP-101 treatment completely eliminated the Noc-mediated

Ca2+ current inhibition to 6 ± 2% (SEM, n =4). The inset in Figure 3D shows the Ca2+ currents

elicited before and after application of Noc + UFP-101.

In this set of experiments the signaling components involved in ORL1 receptor-mediated

Ca2+ channel inhibition were examined. ORL1 receptors typically couple to the PTX-sensitive

Gαi/o G protein subfamily. Figure 4A shows the time course of peak Ca2+ currents following

application of Noc (3 µM) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, 10 µM). VIP stimulates a G-

protein coupled receptor subtype that preferentially couples to the PTX-insensitive Gαs G protein

subfamily (Zhu and Ikeda, 1994). The inset in Figure 4A shows the Ca2+ current traces before

and after agonist exposure. The Ca2+ current inhibition mediated by Noc and VIP were 64 ± 4%

(SEM, n=10) and 54 ± 5% (SEM, n=6), respectively. A separate group of SG neurons was

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 12: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

12

pretreated overnight with PTX and the time course of peak Ca2+ currents is shown Figure 4B.

The plot and inset show that application of Noc resulted in a small inhibition of Ca2+ currents

when compared to control neurons. Conversely, when the neuron was exposed to VIP, Ca2+

current inhibition was similar to that observed in control neurons. Figure 4C is a summary that

illustrates PTX pretreatment disrupted the coupling between ORL1 receptors and Ca2+ channels

such that the Noc-mediated Ca2+ current inhibition was significantly decreased (P < 0.05).

We next wanted to determine whether the Noc-mediated inhibitory effects on Ca2+ currents

occurred in a voltage-dependent (VD) manner. N-type Ca2+ channel currents are modulated by

various neurotransmitters resulting in ‘kinetic slowing’ of the rising Ca2+ currents during a

depolarizing test pulse (for review see Ikeda and Dunlap, 1999). The kinetic slowing is thought

to be the result of a VD relief of channel block during the test pulse. The VD relief of Ca2+

channel inhibition leads to ‘facilitation’ of Ca2+ currents and can be observed by applying a

‘double pulse’ voltage protocol (Ikeda 1991). Employing this voltage paradigm, Ca2+ current

amplitude is measured from the test pulses (+ 10 mV) occurring after and before the conditioning

pulse to +80 mV. One hallmark of VD inhibition is an enhanced postpulse current amplitude.

Figure 4D shows superimposed Ca2+ current traces evoked with the ‘double-pulse’ voltage

protocol (shown at the top) before (upper trace) and after (lower trace) Noc (3 µM) exposure. In

the absence of agonist, it can be seen that the conditioning pulse had a minor effect on the

postpulse current amplitude. The presence of a ‘tonic facilitation’ in sympathetic neurons has

been shown to result from a small degree of basal G protein activation (Ikeda 1991; Ruiz-

Velasco and Ikeda, 2000). Following bath application of Noc, the Ca2+ currents displayed both a

VD block and kinetic slowing as evidenced by the biphasic rising phase (upper trace). It should

be mentioned that the conditioning pulse did not fully restore current amplitude in the presence

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 13: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

13

of Noc. This is possibly a result of a voltage-independent modulation of Ca2+ channels and

involves second messenger pathways (Ikeda and Dunlap, 1999; Beedle et al., 2004).

At least two ORL1 receptor splice variants have been reported to be expressed in rat

sympathetic (superior cervical and lumbar) and sensory neurons (Xie et al., 1999). The long

variant contains an 84 base pair insertion in the receptor’s second extracellular loop domain. This

additional sequence contains a putative N-linked glycosylation site. In this set of experiments,

we wanted to ascertain which ORL1 receptor subtype was present in SG neurons. Following

mRNA isolation and PCR amplification with primers (see Methods), the receptor was cloned.

Figure 5 shows the nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence of the cloned ORL1 receptor in

SG neurons. Of the eight clones obtained, none contained the 84 base insertion described above.

The boxed amino acid sequences represent putative transmembrane segments. This sequence

corresponds to the short splice variant of the ORL1 receptor (Xie et al., 1999). When compared

to other deduced amino acid sequences derived from short splice variant forms isolated from rat

brain (GenBank Acc #s NM_031569, D16438 and U07871), there is a 100% homology. Thus,

from these results, the long splice variant does not appear to be expressed in rat SG neurons.

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 14: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

14

Discussion

The series of aforementioned experiments explored the coupling mechanisms between the

opioid ORL1 receptor and Ca2+ channels in rat SG neurons. Administration of the endogenous

ORL1 receptor ligand, Noc, has been reported to exert vasopressor effects. The cardiovascular

actions produced by Noc are a result of the peptide’s ability to modulate autonomic

neurotransmission at several levels (Kapusta 2000). For instance, Noc can inhibit NE release in

sympathetic neurons innervating blood vessels (Malinowska et al., 2000), vas deferens (Bigoni et

al., 1999) and rat tail artery (Bucher 1998). In addition, the hypotensive and bradycardiac effects

of Noc administration have been shown to correlate with decreases in plasma NE levels (Hashiba

et al., 2003). Finally, a recent report found that ORL1 receptors are present in rat sympathetic

neurons innervating cardiac muscle (Malinowska et al., 2001). Since ORL1 receptors and N-type

Ca2+ channels have been found to form a physical complex (Beedle et al., 2004), it was

hypothesized that Noc-stimulated ORL1 receptors would modulate Ca2+ channels in SG neurons.

Thus, we took advantage of our ability to retrograde label SG neurons with a fluorescent tracer in

a noninvasive manner to focus on the signaling mechanisms underlying the modulation of Ca2+

channels by Noc-stimulated ORL1 receptors.

Our initial findings suggest that in acutely isolated SG neurons the three classical opioid

receptors (µ, κ, and δ) are not expressed in the soma. These results are supported by previous

studies that reported opioid peptides modulate preganglionic rather than postganglionic nerve

activity in rat (Mo et al., 1994), cat (Prosdocimi et al., 1986) and guinea pig (Ledda et al., 1984)

SG neurons. Although these earlier studies did not focus on ion channel modulation, they

provide evidence that suggests these opioid receptor subtypes do not modulate postganglionic

transmission in SG neurons. An alternative explanation may be that stimulation of these

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 15: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

15

receptors does not lead to N-type Ca2+ channel modulation. Further studies need to be performed

to explore this possibility.

The measured potency of the Noc-mediated Ca2+ current inhibition in this study was

comparable to the values reported by others in pyramidal neurons (Knoflach et al., 1996) and

cultured cells (Morikawa et al., 1998). However, the EC50 value was greater than that found in

periaqueductal grey neurons (Connor and Christie, 1998), rat dorsal root ganglion (DRG)

neurons (Beedle et al., 2004) and nearly 200-fold higher in rat superior cervical ganglion (SCG)

neurons (Larsson et al., 2000). One possible reason for the discrepant findings between

sympathetic SCG and SG neurons may be the rat strain employed. Wistar rats were used in the

present study, while Sprague-Dawley rats were employed by Larsson et al., 2000. Secondly, we

recorded Ca2+ currents from neurons that were incubated overnight following cell dissociation,

while Larsson and colleagues measured Ca2+ channel currents within 3 to 8 hours of cell

isolation. And thirdly, differences in ORL1 receptor expression density between both neuron cell

types may also account for these discrepancies. Finally, the difference in potency between the

present study and that in rat DRG neurons (Beedle et al., 2004) may be a result of the ORL1

receptor splice variant expressed in each neuron type. For example, a recent molecular study

(discussed below) found that ORL1 mRNA is present in both SCG and DRG (Xie et al., 1999).

However, expression of the long splice variant is dominant in the former while expression of the

shorter splice variant is greater in the latter.

In the present study, the signaling elements involved in coupling ORL1 receptors and Ca2+

channels were also investigated. As ORL1 receptors, and opioid receptors in general, are well

established to couple to PTX-sensitive Gαi/o protein subunits (New and Wong, 2002), we found

that Ca2+ channel inhibition was significantly decreased in SG neurons pretreated with the toxin.

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 16: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

16

Similar findings have been previously published (Morikawa et al., 1998; Connor et al., 1999;

Larsson et al., 2000; Beedle et al., 2004; Yeon et al., 2004). Nevertheless, it has been reported

that ORL1 receptors are also capable of coupling to other PTX-insensitive Gα protein subunit to

modulate other effectors (Chan et al., 1998; Chan and Wong 2000).

In this study the modulation of N-type Ca2+ channel currents by Noc-stimulated receptors

was further examined. The VD inhibition of Ca2+ currents is membrane-delimited and mediated

by the free Gβγ dimers that are released following receptor stimulation (Herlitze et al., 1996;

Ikeda 1996). Exposure of labeled neurons to Noc resulted in the VD inhibition of Ca2+ currents,

as observed by kinetic slowing and an increase in postpulse facilitation. Although it is not

exactly clear how binding of Gβγ is coupled to the activation machinery of N-type Ca2+

channels, our observations also point to Gβγ as the active moiety that modulates N-type Ca2+

channels. These observations have been reported in other neurons and expression systems

(Morikawa et al., 1998; Connor et al., 1999; Larsson et al., 2000; Beedle et al., 2004; Yeon et al.,

2004). In a more detailed study of Noc’s modulation of Ca2+ channels, evidence has been

presented to indicate that ORL1 receptors form a physical signaling complex with N-type Ca2+

channels that results in tonic VD inhibition (Beedle et al., 2004). In that report, it was shown that

the agonist-independent, tonic VD inhibition of N-type Ca2+ channels occurred in both rat DRG

neurons and tsa-201 transfected cells. The tonic inhibition was more noticeable in small DRG

than in large DRG neurons (Beedle et al., 2004).

Pharmacological studies employing ORL1-κ opioid receptor chimeras have shown that the

second extracellular loop plays an essential role in ORL1 receptor binding and activation

(Mollereau et al., 1999; New and Wong 2002). Previous reports have shown that at least two

ORL1 opioid receptor splice variants (long and short) are present in rats (Wang et al., 1994; Xie

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 17: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

17

et al., 1999). The long splice variant contains an additional 84 base pair sequence (28 amino

acids) that codes for an N-linked glycosylation sequence in the second extracellular loop.

Currently, expression or functional data exploring the consequence of this additional sequence is

not available and needs to be further examined. Interestingly, Xie and colleagues (1999) found

that the ratio of long to short splice variant expression, as measured by mRNA levels, in rat

sympathetic lumbar and superior cervical ganglion (SCG) neurons was approximately 5:1. More

recent studies indicate the existence of several additional splice variants (Curro et al., 2001) and

an 81 base insertion in the second extracellular loop due to retention of intron 3 (Xie et al.,

2000). This retained intron is in the same location as the 84 base insertion mentioned above but

leads to an inframe stop resulting in a truncated receptor protein. However, in the present study

only the short splice variant was detected in mRNA samples isolated from SG neurons. Thus, it

appears that ORL1 receptor expression in rat peripheral sympathetic neurons may occur in a

differential manner and may also help explain the differences in N-type Ca2+ channel modulation

between SG and SCG (Larsson et al., 2000) or DRG neurons (Beedle et al., 2004) indicated

above.

Recent observations by Malinowska and colleagues (Malinowska et al., 2000-2002) have

shown that intravenous exposure of Noc in anesthetized rats led to a decrease in blood pressure

and heart rate. As ORL1 receptors are expressed in central and peripheral nervous systems, the

Noc-induced effects likely occur at several levels. For instance, Noc has been shown to inhibit

the inotropic response produced by electrically-evoked NE release from sympathetic nerve

endings in the guinea pig isolated atrium (Giuliani and Maggi 1997b). Thus, the findings of the

present study further aid in elucidating some of the underlying mechanisms that are involved in

the regulation of the cardiovascular system following Noc administration. This study focused on

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 18: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

18

SG neurons, the sympathetic input to cardiac muscle. These findings suggest that the Noc-

induced hypotension and bradycardia, observed by others (Giuliani et al., 1997a; Malinowska et

al., 2001) is the result of neurotransmitter release modulation via N-type Ca2+ channel inhibition

in SG neurons. The presence of ORL1 receptors in SG neurons, therefore likely regulate Noc-

induced cardiac inotropism.

In summary, our results show that sympathetic SG neurons innervating cardiac muscle

express ORL1 receptors that modulate N-type Ca2+ channels following exposure to Noc. The

ORL1 receptor-Ca2+ channel coupling mechanism is PTX-sensitive and blocked by the UFP-101

compound. Moreover, the inhibition of N-type Ca2+ channels is VD and membrane-delimited.

Cloning experiments of the ORL1 receptor revealed one receptor subtype or one splice variant in

adult rats.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Giro Calo (Dept. of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Section of

Pharmacology, Univ. of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy) for kindly supplying UFP-101.

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 19: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

19

References

Beedle AM, McRory JE, Poirot O, Doering CJ, Altier C, Barrere C, Hamid J, Nargeot J,

Bourinet E, and Zamponi GW. (2004) Agonist-independent modulation of N-type calcium

channels by ORL1 receptors. Nature Neurosci 7:118-125.

Bigoni R, Giuliani S, Calo G, Rizzi A, Guerrini R, Salvadori S, Regoli D, and Maggi CA. (1999)

Characterization of nociceptin receptors in the periphery: in vitro and in vivo studies. Naunyn-

Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 359:160-167.

Bucher B. ORL1 receptor-mediated inhibition by nociceptin of noradrenaline release from

perivascular sympathetic nerve endings of the rat tail artery. (1998) Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s

Arch Pharmacol 358:682-685.

Calo G, Rizzi A, Bigoni R, Guerrini R, Salvadori S, and Regoli D. Pharmacological profile of

nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptors. (2002) Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 29:223-228.

Chan JSC, Yung LY, Lee JWM, Wu Y-L, Pei G, and Wong YH. (1998) Pertussis toxin-

insensitive signaling of the ORL1 receptor: coupling to Gz and G16 proteins. J Neurochem

71:2203-2210.

Chan ASL and Wong YH. (2000) Regulation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase by the ORL1 receptor

through multiple G proteins. J Pharmacol and Exp Ther 295:1094-1100.

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 20: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

20

Connor M and Christie MJ. (1998) Modulation of Ca2+ channel currents of acutely dissociated

rat periaqueductal grey neurons. J Physiol 509:47-58.

Connor M, Vaughan CW, Jennings EA, Allen RG, and Christie MJ. (1999) Nociceptin, Phe1ψ-

nociceptin1-13, nocistatin and prepronociceptin154-181 effects on calcium channel currents and a

potassium current in rat locus coeruleus in vitro. Br J Pharmacol 128:1779-1787.

Curro D, Yoo JH, Anderson M, Song I, Del Valle J, and Owyang C. (2001) Molecular cloning of

the orphanin FQ receptor gene and differential tissue expression of splice variants in rat. Gene

266:139-145.

Fuller BC, Sumner AD, Kutzler MA, and Ruiz-Velasco V. (2004) A novel approach employing

ultrasound guidance for percutaneous cardiac muscle injection to retrograde label rat stellate

ganglion neurons. Neurosci Lett 363:252-256.

Giuliani S, Tramontana M, Lecci A, and Maggi CA. (1997a) Effect of nociceptin on heart rate

and blood pressure in anaesthetized rats. Eur J Pharmacol 333:177-179.

Giuliani S, and Maggi CA. (1997b) Prejunctional modulation by nociceptin of nerve-mediated

inotropic responses in guinea-pig left atrium. Eur J Pharmacol 332:231-236.

Giuliani S, Lecci A, and Maggi CA. (2000) Nociceptin and neurotransmitter release in the

periphery. Peptides 21:977-984.

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 21: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

21

Hashiba E, Hirota K, Kudo T, Calo G, Guerrini R, and Matsuki A. (2003) Effects of

nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor ligands on blood pressure, heart rate, and plasma catecholamine

concentrations in guinea pig. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 367:342-347.

Herlitze S, Garcia DE, Mackie K, Hille B, Scheuer T, and Catteral WA. (1996) Modulation of

Ca2+ channels by G-protein βγ subunits. Nature 380:258-262.

Ikeda SR. (1991) Double-pulse calcium channel current facilitation in adult rat sympathetic

neurones. J Physiol 439:181-214.

Ikeda SR. (1996) Voltage-dependent modulation of N-type Ca2+ channels by G-protein βγ

subunits. Nature 380:255-258.

Ikeda SR and Dunlap K. (1999) Voltage-dependent modulation of N-type calcium channels: role

of G protein subunits. Adv Sec Mess Phospho Res. 33:131-151.

Kapusta DR. (2000) Neurohumoral effects of orphanin FQ/nociceptin: relevance to

cardiovascular and renal function. Peptides 21:1081-1099.

Knoflach F. Reinscheid RK, Civelli O, Kemp JA. (1996) Modulation of voltage-gated calcium

channels by orphanin FQ in freshly dissociated hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci 16:6657-6664.

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 22: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

22

Kukwa W, Macioch T, and Szulczyk PJ. (1998) Stellate neurons innervating the rat heart express

N, L and P/Q calcium channels. J Auton Ner Sys 74:143-151.

Larsson KP, Olsen UB, and Hansen AJ. (2000) Nociceptin is a potent inhibitor of N-type Ca2+

channels in rat sympathetic ganglion neurons. Neuroscience Lett 296:121-124.

Ledda F, Mantelli L, Corti V, and Fantozzi R. (1984) Inhibition of the cardiac response to

sympathetic nerve stimulation by opioid peptides and its potentiation by morphine and

methadone. Eur J Pharmacol 102:443-450.

Malinowska B, Kozlowska H, Koneczny B., and Schlicker E. (2000) Nociceptin inhibits the

neurogenic vasopressor response in the pithed rat via prejunctional ORL1 receptors. Naunyn-

Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 361:80-84.

Malinowska B, Piszcz J, Koneczny B, Hryniewicz A, and Schlicker E. (2001) Modulation of the

cardiac autonomic transmission of pithed rats by presynaptic opioid OP4 and cannabinoid CB1

receptors. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 364:233-241.

Malinowska B, Godlewski G, and Schlicker E. (2002) Function of nociceptin and opioid OP4

receptors in the regulation of the cardiovascular system. J Physiol Pharmacol 53:301-324.

Meunier J-C, Mouldeous L, and Topham CM. (2000) The nociceptin (ORL1) receptor:

molecular cloning and functional architecture. Peptides 21:893-900.

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 23: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

23

Mo N, Wallis DI, and Watson A. (1994) Properties of putative cardiac and non-cardiac neurons

in the rat stellate ganglion. J Auton Ner Sys 47:7-22.

Mollereau C, Mouledous L, Lapalu S, Cambois G, Moisand C, Butour J-L, and Meunier J-C.

(1999) Distinct mechanisms for activation of the opioid receptor-like 1 and κ-opioid receptors by

nociceptin and dynorphin A. Mol Pharm 55:324-331.

Morikawa H, Fukuda K, Mima H, Shoda T, Kato S, and Mori K. (1998) Nociceptin receptor-

mediated Ca2+ channel inhibition and its desensitization in NG108-15 cells. Eur J Pharmacol

351:247-252.

New DC and Wong YH. (2002) The ORL1 receptor: Molecular pharmacology and signaling

mechanisms. Neurosignals 11:197-212.

Prosdocimi M, Finesso M, and Gorio A. (1986) Enkephalin modulation of neural transmission in

the cat stellate ganglion: pharmacological actions of exogenous opiates. J Auton Ner Sys 17:217-

230.

Ruiz-Velasco V and Ikeda SR. (2000) Multiple G-protein βγ combinations produce voltage-

dependent inhibition of N-type calcium channels in rat superior cervical ganglion neurons. J

Neurosci 20:2183-2191.

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 24: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

24

Salis MB, Emanueli C, Milia AF, Guerrini R, and Madeddu P. (2000) Studies of the

cardiovascular effects of nociceptin and related peptides. Peptides 21:985-993.

Wallis D, Watson AHD, and Mo N. (1996) Cardiac neurons of autonomic ganglia. Mic Res Tech

35:69-79.

Wang JB, Johnson PS, Imai Y, Persico AM, Ozenberger BA, Eppler CM, and Uhl GR. (1994)

cDNA cloning of an orphan opiate receptor gene family member and its splice variant. FEBS

Lett 348:75-79.

Xie G-X, Meuser T, Pietruck C, Sharma M, and Palmer PP. (1999) Presence of opioid receptor-

like (ORL) receptor mRNA splice variants in peripheral sensory and sympathetic neuronal

ganglia. Life Sci 64:2029-2037.

Xie G, Ito E, Maruyama K, Pietruck C, Sharma M, Yu L, Pierce Palmer P. (2000) An

alternatively spliced transcript of the rat nociceptin receptor ORL1 gene encodes a truncated

receptor. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 77:1-9.

Yeon K-Y, Sim M-Y, Choi S-Y, Lee SJ, Park K, Kim JS, Lee J-H, Lee K-M, and Oh SB. (2004)

Molecular mechanisms underlying calcium current modulation by nociceptin. Neuroreport

15:2205-2209.

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 25: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

25

Zhu Y and Ikeda SR. (1994) VIP inhibits N-type Ca2+ channels of sympathetic neurons via a

pertussis toxin-insensitive but cholera toxin-sensitive pathway. Neuron 13:657-669.

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 26: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

26

Footnotes

This study was supported by National Institute of Health Grant HL-074311 to V.R.-V.

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 27: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

27

Legends for Figures

Figure 1: Phase contrast (A) and fluorescence (B) image of SG neurons isolated from an adult

rat six days following DiI injection to the cardiac muscle. The fluorescence image was obtained

with a filter set specific for DiI (540 nm excitation and 620 nm emission). The fluorescence

image was pseudocolored; scale bar represents 20 µm.

Figure 2: Effect of opioid receptor agonists on Ca2+ channel currents and facilitation of

nociceptin-mediated Ca2+ current inhibition. A. Time course of Ca2+ current amplitudes of

labeled SG neurons were recorded every 10 seconds by applying a 50 ms depolarizing test pulse

to +10 mV from a holding potential of -80 mV. Filled bars indicate application of 10 µM

endomorphin I, 3 µM nociceptin and 10 µM U-50488. B. Superimposed current traces from SG

neuron in A recorded before and during opioid receptor agonist application. C. Summary of

mean (± SEM) Ca2+ current inhibition produced by each opioid receptor agonist: nociceptin

(ORL1), Deltorphin II (δ, 2 µM), U-50488 (κ) and Endomorphin I (µ). Numbers in parentheses

indicate the number of experiments.

Figure 3: Nociceptin concentration-response relationship of labeled SG neurons and sensitivity

to UFP-101. A. Time course of Ca2+ current amplitude inhibition acquired from the sequential

application of 0.03 and 1 µM nociceptin in labeled SG neurons. Currents were evoked every 10 s

by a single 50 ms test pulse to +10 mV from a holding potential of -80 mV. B. Superimposed

current traces from the neuron in A represent those before and during agonist application. C.

Nociceptin-mediated Ca2+ current inhibition. The peak Ca2+ current inhibition was normalized to

the peak current evoked by 3 µM nociceptin. Each data point represents the mean (± SEM). D.

Summary graph showing the mean (± SEM) Ca2+ current inhibition produced by 1 µM

nociceptin and 1 µM nociceptin + 10 µM UFP-101. Inset shows superimposed current traces

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 28: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

JPET #89284

28

before (control) and after application of nociceptin + UFP-101. Numbers in parentheses indicate

the number of experiments.

Figure 4: Nociceptin-mediated Ca2+ current inhibition is pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive and

voltage-dependent. A, B. Time course of Ca2+ current amplitudes of labeled SG neurons acquired

as in Figure 2A in control (A) and PTX-treated (500 ng/ml, B) labeled SG neurons. Filled bars

indicate application of 3 µM nociceptin and 10 µM VIP. D. Summary of mean (± SEM) Ca2+

current inhibition produced by nociceptin and VIP. Numbers in parentheses indicate the number

of experiments. * p < 0.05 compared to Control, Student’s t-test. D. Superimposed Ca2+ current

traces evoked with the double-pulse voltage protocol (shown at top) in the absence (lower traces)

and presence (upper traces) of 3 µM nociceptin in a labeled SG neuron.

Figure 5: Rat SG ORL1 receptor cDNA nucleotide sequence and its predicted amino acid

sequence. The nucleotide sequence is numbered from the start codon ATG and the stop codon is

represented by the asterisk. The receptor’s putative seven transmembrane domains are boxed.

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 29: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 30: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 31: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 32: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from

Page 33: JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI:10 ...jpet.aspetjournals.org/.../03/jpet.105.089284.full.pdf · JPET #89284 4 Introduction The opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor

This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.JPET Fast Forward. Published on June 3, 2005 as DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.089284

at ASPE

T Journals on July 5, 2020

jpet.aspetjournals.orgD

ownloaded from