jingwan huo, chris yuan synthesis and characterization of fe 3 o 4 -tio 2 three- dimensional ordered...
TRANSCRIPT
Synthesis and characterization of Fe3O4-TiO2 three-dimensional ordered macroporous nano-absorbent material for heavy metal removal
Jingwan Huo, Chris YuanH
eavy
met
al r
emov
al
proc
esse
s
Solid/liquid separation
Absorption
High efficiency
Low cost
Insensitivity to toxic substancesIon exchange
Biological removal
Figure 1. Schematic of synthesis process of Fe3O4-TiO2 magnetic composite for heavy metal removal
Mechanism of absorption:
Take Cu2+ for example, its adsorption onto Fe3O4 surface hydroxyl
groups in the pH region of 2-6 can be described as below:
-FeO- + H+ = -FeOH
-FeOH + H+ = -FeOH2+
-mFeOH + Cu2+ = -(Fe-O)mCu(2-m)+ + mH+
Where –FeOH is the surface hydroxyl site.
The preparation of Fe3O4-TiO2 3DOM absorbent are consist of 3 steps: 1) preparation of 3DOM TiO2
structure, 2) synthesis of Fe3O4 nanopartilces, 3) assemble Fe3O4 nanoparticles onto 3DOM TiO2
Methods and Results
Figure 2 SEM image of PMMA colloidal crystals
Figure 3 SEM image of 3DOM TiO2 material
The large pores have a size of 300 nm, and in each large pores there are three circular windows formed where the PMMA spheres were contacted to each other.
PMMA spheres have an average diameter of 310 nm with a narrow distribution, and the spheres were close-packed into an fcc lattice
Results
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
20
40
60
80
100
pHC
oppe
r re
mov
al %
Fe3O4 nanoparicles with size ~40 nm were successfully synthesized through hydrothermal method. From Figure 3 b) and c), Fe3O4 nanoparticles were dispersed onto walls of 3DOM TiO2 material, and the loading amount need further optimization.
Figure 3 SEM image of a) amino-functionalized Fe3O4 nanoparticles, b) Fe3O4-TiO2 composite under high magnification, c) Fe3O4-TiO2
composite under low magnification
Figure 5 Copper ion removal at different pH
The capacity of Cu (II) adsorbed was monitored by measuring Cu (II) concentrations of the initial and final solutions, which is shown in Figure 4 below. At pH=10, the Cu (II) removal efficiency reached ~98%