IST programmeIST programme

INTEGRATED PROGRAMME INTEGRATED PROGRAMME PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS 2004PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS 2004

Outline of presentationOutline of presentation

Why IPPA 2004 ?Why IPPA 2004 ?

Main findingsMain findings– Facts and figuresFacts and figures

– PortfolioPortfolio• Reinforce European strengths Reinforce European strengths

• Exploit new opportunitiesExploit new opportunities

• Ensure the co-evolution of technology and applicationsEnsure the co-evolution of technology and applications

• Future visions and emerging technologies (FET) Future visions and emerging technologies (FET)

• Support infrastructure developmentSupport infrastructure development

SWOT analysisSWOT analysis

The futureThe future– Portfolio analysis and impact observatoryPortfolio analysis and impact observatory

WHY IPPA 2004 ?WHY IPPA 2004 ?

Contribute to impact analysis Contribute to impact analysis Help define priorities for IST WP 2005-06 Help define priorities for IST WP 2005-06 Contribute to IST priorities in FP7 Contribute to IST priorities in FP7

1.1.Consolidation of call 1 and call 2 statistical analysis Consolidation of call 1 and call 2 statistical analysis

2.2.Snapshot of the project portfolio for each SOSnapshot of the project portfolio for each SO# of projects by instrument and budget# of projects by instrument and budgetBudget distribution (%) per participating countryBudget distribution (%) per participating countryBudget for top 20 beneficiariesBudget for top 20 beneficiariesBudget per organisation typeBudget per organisation typeObjectives and planned deliverables Objectives and planned deliverables For each SO, coverage in terms of effort, actors and expected For each SO, coverage in terms of effort, actors and expected impact impact

3.3.SWOT analysis.SWOT analysis.

Facts and Figures Facts and Figures

Call 1Call 1– Closed April 2003 – funding Closed April 2003 – funding € 1070m€ 1070m– 236 projects negotiated and launched236 projects negotiated and launched

Call 2Call 2– Closed October 2003 – funding Closed October 2003 – funding € 525m€ 525m– 148 projects under negotiation or launched148 projects under negotiation or launched

Joint Call with production technologiesJoint Call with production technologies – Closed April 2003 – funding € 60mClosed April 2003 – funding € 60m

FET (Future and Emerging technologies) OpenFET (Future and Emerging technologies) Open– Continuous call – funding Continuous call – funding € 60m€ 60m

IST Calls 2003-04 : Implementation IST Calls 2003-04 : Implementation

1,9 out of 3,8 Billion € spent 1,9 out of 3,8 Billion € spent in calls in 2003-04in calls in 2003-04

More than 400 projects More than 400 projects supported supported – Out of 2500 proposals Out of 2500 proposals

receivedreceived

More than 6500 More than 6500 participationsparticipations

OversubscriptionOversubscription

CA1%

IP57%

NOE15%

SSA2%

STREP25%

Funding per InstrumentIST Calls 1 & 2

Participation (I)Participation (I)

Funding per MS (%) - FP5/FP6

0

5

10

15

20

25

FP5 FP6 (Call 1+2)

Participation (II)Participation (II)

Funding per participating country (NMS/ACC/AS/Other)

0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5

PolandHungary

Czech RepublicSloveniaCyprus

LithuaniaEstonia

LatviaSlovakia

MaltaTurkey

BulgariaRomania

SwitzerlandNorway

IsraelIceland

Liechtenstein3rd Countries

Funding (% of total)

call 2

call 1

IST Calls 2003-04 : IST Calls 2003-04 : ParticipationParticipation

IndustryAcademia

Non-profit org.

Participants HighlightsParticipants Highlights

Organisations from Germany #1 in 15 out of 23 SOsOrganisations from Germany #1 in 15 out of 23 SOs The Fraunhofer Ges. Institutes in top 20 in 21 SOs The Fraunhofer Ges. Institutes in top 20 in 21 SOs University of Karlsruhe best funded university University of Karlsruhe best funded university Italian organisations #1 in 4 SOs Italian organisations #1 in 4 SOs France #1 in 3 SOsFrance #1 in 3 SOs

Industry top participants : Philips, CEA, Alcatel, Industry top participants : Philips, CEA, Alcatel, Telefonica, France Telecom, Siemens, Ericsson and Telefonica, France Telecom, Siemens, Ericsson and NokiaNokia

Top 20 participantsTop 20 participants

FRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFT FRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFT INTERUNIVERSITAIR MICRO-ELECTRONICA CENTRUM VZWINTERUNIVERSITAIR MICRO-ELECTRONICA CENTRUM VZW DAIMLERCHRYSLER AGDAIMLERCHRYSLER AG COMMISSARIAT A L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUECOMMISSARIAT A L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUE SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFTSIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT FRANCE TELECOMFRANCE TELECOM CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUECENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE UNIVERSITAET KARLSRUHE (TH)UNIVERSITAET KARLSRUHE (TH) TELEFONICA TELEFONICA STMICROELECTRONICS SASTMICROELECTRONICS SA PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NEDERLAND B.V.PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NEDERLAND B.V. BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLCBRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC INSTITUTE OF COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTER SYSTEMSINSTITUTE OF COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AGINFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLANDTECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND CONSIGLIO NAZIONALE DELLE RICERCHECONSIGLIO NAZIONALE DELLE RICERCHE KUNGLIGA TEKNISKA HOEGSKOLANKUNGLIGA TEKNISKA HOEGSKOLAN DFKI GMBHDFKI GMBH THALES COMMUNICATIONS S.A.THALES COMMUNICATIONS S.A. UNIVERSITAT POLITECNICA DE CATALUNYAUNIVERSITAT POLITECNICA DE CATALUNYA

IST Calls 2003-04 : ConcentrationIST Calls 2003-04 : Concentration

Concentration of effort and building critical mass Concentration of effort and building critical mass – Total number of projects selected : Total number of projects selected :

3 times less than FP5 for an equivalent budget3 times less than FP5 for an equivalent budget– Average budget of Integrated Projects : Average budget of Integrated Projects :

5 times larger than FP5 projects 5 times larger than FP5 projects

Setting up & managing larger projects : a challengeSetting up & managing larger projects : a challengeAverage project funding

FP5 all instruments

FP6 average

FP6 STREP

FP6 IP

FP6 NoE

FP6 CA/SSA

012

34567

89

10

IST Calls 2003-04 : IntegrationIST Calls 2003-04 : Integration

More intensive collaboration between various actorsMore intensive collaboration between various actors– Integrated Projects: 2-3 times as many partners per projectIntegrated Projects: 2-3 times as many partners per project– From industry, academia and public research labs From industry, academia and public research labs

Concern over SME participationConcern over SME participation

Integration of effort in an enlarged Europe importantIntegration of effort in an enlarged Europe important International co-operationInternational co-operation

Average number of participants FP5-FP6

FP5 all instruments

FP6 average

FP6 STREP

FP6 IP

FP6 NoE

FP6 CA

FP6 SSA

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Lessons for WP 2005-06 preparationLessons for WP 2005-06 preparation

Large oversubscription in some fieldsLarge oversubscription in some fields– ““Networked Government, Networked Business”, “ICT forHealth”, Networked Government, Networked Business”, “ICT forHealth”,

“Technology Enhanced Learning/ Access to Cultural Heritage”, “software”, “Technology Enhanced Learning/ Access to Cultural Heritage”, “software”, “Risk Management” and “Mobile applications”: Around 10%“Risk Management” and “Mobile applications”: Around 10%

Low SMEs participationLow SMEs participation– Call1: 16%; Call2: 17%Call1: 16%; Call2: 17%– NoEs : 7%; IPs: 15%; STREPs: 24%NoEs : 7%; IPs: 15%; STREPs: 24%

Integration of the ICT research effort in an enlarged Integration of the ICT research effort in an enlarged EuropeEurope– Participation of Member States that joined the EU recently and of Participation of Member States that joined the EU recently and of

Associated Candidate Countries below expectations (3 to 4%)Associated Candidate Countries below expectations (3 to 4%)

International co-operationInternational co-operation– Domain-specific approaches are neededDomain-specific approaches are needed

Lessons on new instrumentsLessons on new instruments

Observations coherent with conclusions of the Marimon panel.Observations coherent with conclusions of the Marimon panel. Further concentration Further concentration More ambitious proposals (IPs)More ambitious proposals (IPs) STREPs continue to be a flexible and well understood instrument STREPs continue to be a flexible and well understood instrument

Issues concerning NoEs:Issues concerning NoEs:

– governing rules governing rules – optimal size of NoEs.optimal size of NoEs.– added-value wrt co-ordination actions or SSAs.added-value wrt co-ordination actions or SSAs.– budgeting rules budgeting rules – practical implementation of “lasting integration”.practical implementation of “lasting integration”.– integration across disciplines or across borders. integration across disciplines or across borders. – lack of industrial involvement in NoEs. lack of industrial involvement in NoEs.

Portfolio analysisPortfolio analysis

Budget distribution for strategic areas (%)

Reinforce Leadership

27%

New opportunities

24%

Applications31%

Frontier of knowldege

7%

Infrastructure11%

450 MEuros

420 MEuros

120 MEuros

130 MEuros

480 MEuros

Reinforce leadership where Europe has demonstrated Reinforce leadership where Europe has demonstrated strengths, e.g.strengths, e.g.

– mobile communications and services, broadband communicationsmobile communications and services, broadband communications– micro-opto electronics & µsystems, micro-opto electronics & µsystems, – networked audiovisual systems...networked audiovisual systems...

Seize new opportunities that arise from the ‘AmI’ vision and Seize new opportunities that arise from the ‘AmI’ vision and address weaknesses / threats critical for its realisation, e.g.address weaknesses / threats critical for its realisation, e.g.

– multimodal interfaces, semantic-based knowledge handling,.. multimodal interfaces, semantic-based knowledge handling,.. – embedded systems,... embedded systems,... – Knowledge and computing GRIDs, Knowledge and computing GRIDs, – Security and dependability,…Security and dependability,…

Defining the SOs: Five main groups (1)Defining the SOs: Five main groups (1)

Defining the SOs: five main groups (2) Defining the SOs: five main groups (2)

Continued support to leading / challenging applications, Continued support to leading / challenging applications, responding to emerging needs,responding to emerging needs, e.g. e.g.

– eeHealth, eInclusion, eLearning and culture, Health, eInclusion, eLearning and culture, – Entertainment and leisure contentEntertainment and leisure content– business support tools, networked organisations,...business support tools, networked organisations,...

Support to research at the frontier of knowledgeSupport to research at the frontier of knowledge– FET open FET open – FET proactiveFET proactive– Cognitive systemsCognitive systems

Support to infrastructure developmentSupport to infrastructure development– Research networking test bedsResearch networking test beds– Open development platformsOpen development platforms– IST for safety in transport, risk management,..IST for safety in transport, risk management,..

Reinforce leadership where Europe has demonstrated strengthReinforce leadership where Europe has demonstrated strength

MicroelectronicsMicroelectronics

MicrosystemsMicrosystems

Mobile and broadband communicationsMobile and broadband communications

Audio-visual systems and consumer electronicsAudio-visual systems and consumer electronics

Objective : Objective : maintain and further develop Europe’s position maintain and further develop Europe’s position on the global scale on the global scale

• improved structuring of research activities improved structuring of research activities • continuity of action continuity of action • standards and open environmentsstandards and open environments• pushing the limits of technologypushing the limits of technology

FocusFocus CMOS – Post CMOS: 89 MEuros CMOS – Post CMOS: 89 MEuros

2 CA1%

2 IP53%

2 NOE20%

3 SSA1%

7 STREP25%

Funding per participating country

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

DE FR BE NL IT UK IL FI SE GR ES AT PL RU IE CZ CH NO PT UA LT TR HR HU DK BY

Fu

nd

ing

(%)

Top 20 partners

0 2 4 6 8 10

IMECPHILIPS

STMICROELECTRONICSCOMMISSARIAT A L'ENERG.

ASML NETHERLANDS B.V.CARL ZEISS SMT AG

INFINEONXTREME TECHNOLOGIES

CNRSFRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFT

DCA-INSTRUMENTS OYIBM ISRAEL

ATMEL GERMANYISILTEC

DEMOKRITOSNETHER. APPL. SCIEN. RES.

PACT XPPXENOCS

THALES COMMUNICATIONS S.A.UNIVERSITAET KARLSRUHE (TH)

SAGEM SA

Funding (%)

HES19%

IND43%

REC29%

SME9%

FP 6-IST Call 1: Processes, Materials, Equipment & Devices - A European Nano-Electronics Cluster

NanoCMOS & SINANOSi Processes & Devices for

features down to 10 nm

NanoCMOS & SINANOSi Processes & Devices for

features down to 10 nm

Altern. BEopto on Si(PICMOS)

Altern. BEopto on Si(PICMOS)

Altern. FE Ge & high k

(ET4US)

Altern. FE Ge & high k

(ET4US)New Memory

Concepts(Nosce Memorias)

New MemoryConcepts

(Nosce Memorias)

Materials & DefectsMaterials

& DefectsNano

Devices &Architectures

Nano Devices &

Architectures

Virtual300mm

(Fl.Wafer)0

Virtual300mm

(Fl.Wafer)0

12 projects of ca. 89 M€ funding...

Design&Technol.for compound PAs

(TARGET)

Design&Technol.for compound PAs

(TARGET)

More Moore EUV 45/32/22 nm node

More Moore EUV 45/32/22 nm node

Litho-Metrology(Ocsli)

Litho-Metrology(Ocsli)

Example: IP NANOCMOSExample: IP NANOCMOS

FundingFunding: 24.17 million euro (first phase of 27 months): 24.17 million euro (first phase of 27 months)

PartnersPartners: STMicroelectronics, Philips, Infineon, IMEC, CEA-LETI, CNRS, FhG-IISB, : STMicroelectronics, Philips, Infineon, IMEC, CEA-LETI, CNRS, FhG-IISB, ZFM, IBS, Isiltec, Magwel, ACIES.ZFM, IBS, Isiltec, Magwel, ACIES.

Objectives:Objectives: keeping Europe at the forefront of nano-electronicskeeping Europe at the forefront of nano-electronics pushing the limits of semiconductor performance and densitypushing the limits of semiconductor performance and density pioneering changes in materials, process modules, device architectures and pioneering changes in materials, process modules, device architectures and

interconnections, modelling and simulation work. interconnections, modelling and simulation work. demonstrating the feasibility of 45nm CMOS technologiesdemonstrating the feasibility of 45nm CMOS technologies exploratory research on critical issues for 32nm and 22nm technologiesexploratory research on critical issues for 32nm and 22nm technologies aims at pilot manufacturing of 45nm technology in 2008-09aims at pilot manufacturing of 45nm technology in 2008-09

Part of a coordinated strategic effort:Part of a coordinated strategic effort:

MEDEA+ proposal for second phase (integration and validation 45nm CMOS MEDEA+ proposal for second phase (integration and validation 45nm CMOS 300mm wafer)300mm wafer)

links with SINANO Network-of-Excellence (9,9 M€ funding, 3 years, 43 partners)links with SINANO Network-of-Excellence (9,9 M€ funding, 3 years, 43 partners)

ADEQUAT-1

1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

0.35m FE; 0.35m BE

ADEQUAT-2 0.25m FE; 0.35m BE

0.18m FE; 0.25m BE

ACE 0.18-0.15m FE; 0.18m BE

HUNT

ARTEMIS 65 nm FE

NANOCMOS45demo+ 32/22 studies, followed by MEDEA+ 45 nm full int.

ADEQUAT +COIN

ADEQUAT

DAMASCENE Copper inter.

100 nm FE

MEDEA+ T201 90 nm Full Integr

NESTOR

ULISSE Cu/low k

45/32/22 FE

MEDEA+ T20765 nm Full Integr.

Some Key European Technology Projects

Mobile and Wireless Systems beyond 3GMobile and Wireless Systems beyond 3G

7 IP69%

3 NOE10%

3 SSA1%

8 STREP20%

Funding per participating country

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

DE FR UK ES FI IT SE GR DK P T NL IE BE HU AT NO IL P L CH SI CY IN LU RU CN

Fu

nd

ing

(%

)

Top 20 partners

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFTTELEFONICA

MOTOROLA SASFRANCE TELECOM

ERICSSON ABAALBORG UNIVERSITET

THALES COMMUNICATIONSTHE UNIVERSITY OF SURREY

ALCATEL SEL AGTECHNICAL RES. CENTRE FINLAND

FRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFT COMMISSARIAT A L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUE

INST. OF COM. AND COMPUTER SYS.NOKIA CORPORATION

RHEINISCH-WESTF. TECHN. HOCHSCHULE AACHENALCATEL SPACE

PORTUGAL TELECOM INOVACAONOKIA GMBH

T-SYSTEMS NOVAINSTITUT EURECOM

DOCOMO COM. LABS. EUROPE

Funding (%)

HES29%

IND48%

OTH1%

REC15%

SME7%

102 MEuro

Different Cycles of Innovation

Networks

Radio

Long cycles – up to a decadeInvestigation and test of new radio technologyRegulation and allocation of spectrumDevelopment of radio products

Medium cycles – several yearsfor IP based functions (e.g. for mobility)

Short cycles – up to ~ a yearDynamic evolution of servicesRegular updates of targets required

Services

System

s B3G

in

Networks

Radio

Long cycles – up to a decadeInvestigation and test of new radio technologyRegulation and allocation of spectrumDevelopment of radio products

Medium cycles – several yearsfor IP-based functions (e.g. for mobility)

Migration to IPv6 will take longer

Short cycles – up to a yearDynamic evolution of servicesRegular updates of targets required

Services

op

eration

Source: Mobile Technology Platform

Mobile and Wireless Systems beyond 3GMobile and Wireless Systems beyond 3G

End to end service delivery

/Convergence

DAIDALOS

End to end service delivery

/Convergence

DAIDALOS

Satellite overlay network MAESTRO

SATNEX (NoE)

Satellite overlay network MAESTRO

SATNEX (NoE)

Dynamic network composition WWI AMBIENT

Personal Area networks

MAGNET

Smart Antennas

ACE (NoE)

Dynamic network composition WWI AMBIENT

Personal Area networks

MAGNET

Smart Antennas

ACE (NoE)

Re-configurable radio

and networks

E2R

Re-configurable radio

and networks

E2R

UWB systems PULSERS

New Radio access for terrestrial systems Beyond 3G

WINNER

NEWCOM (NoE)

UWB systems PULSERS

New Radio access for terrestrial systems Beyond 3G

WINNER

NEWCOM (NoE)

New instrumentscoverage

DaidalosDaidalos

wireless infrastructure ad hocfixed wirelesswireless infrastructureinfrastructure ad hocad hocfixedfixed

DVB - T W - CDMA TD - CDMA Ethernet WLAN Bluetooth

MobilityPricing

ManagementNetwork

AdaptationContent

Informationcontext

Mobility PricingPricingManagementNetworkNetwork

management AdaptationContent

AdaptationContent

Informationcontext

Informationcontext MobilityMobility

SignallingBroadcast

Multicast Information

LocationBroadcast

MulticastBroadcastMulticast Information

Location

Location information

QoSMeteringResource

MonitoringResource

ManagementSecurityA4C QoSMetering

ResourceMonitoring

ResourceManagement

SecurityQoSQoSMeteringMeteringResource

Monitoring

ResourceMonitoring

ResourceManagementResourceManagement

SecuritySecurityA4C

Service Provisioning

Application / Content

Rules and policy engine Context inference engine Personalisation user interfaces

Platform for Pervasive Applications

Multimedia

Telephony - SIPConferencing Mobile data transfer

Session migration

Access Technologies

Pervasive services framework and API

Personalised information deliveryand communication

Context adaptation

Mobile IPv6

Broadband for AllBroadband for All

2 CA3%

4 IP57%

2 NOE9%

1 SSA1%

9 STREP30%

Funding per participating country

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

DE ES FR IT UK BE NO IL SE NL GR DK HU AT P T P L CH RO SI FI BR RU HR TR

Fund

ing

(%)

Top 20 partners

0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5

ALCATEL BELLTELEFONICA

TELECOM ITALIAALCATEL SEL

FRANCE TELECOMLUCENT TECHNOLOGIES NED.

SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFTT-SYSTEMS NOVA

ERICSSON ABTELENOR COMMUNICATION IIMAIN.NET COMMUNICATIONS

DISENO DE SISTEMAS EN SILICIOINTERUNIVERSITAIR MICRO-ELECTR. CENT.

ALCATEL CITBRITISH TELECOM

BUDAPEST UNIV. OF TECHN. AND ECO.INST. OF COM. AND COMPUTER SYS.

POWER PLUS COMMUNICATIONSDANMARKS TEKNISKE UNIVERSITET

TELENOR ASA

Funding (%)

HES22%

IND53%

OTH1%

REC10%

SME14%

85.4 MEuro

Broadband Projects CoverageBroadband Projects Coverage

Optical CoreNetwork Technologies

Broadband Access Technologies

NOBEL (IP)

LA

SA

GN

E

Monitoring and Measurement

Economics of the Internet

Network- and Service- Management

Convergence and Interoperability

OPERA (IP)MUSE (IP)ATHENABROADWANU-BROADCAPANINAOBANEURO-NGI (NoE)DAIDALOSFLEXINET

DIADEM

BREAD (CA)

MOME (CA)

COCOMBINE (SSA)E

-PH

OT

ON

(N

oE

), S

AT

LIF

EA

CE

(N

oE

), G

AN

DA

LF

MESCAL, SEINIT

Explore new opportunities Explore new opportunities that will lead to future marketsthat will lead to future markets

Opto-electronicsOpto-electronics

Embedded technologies Embedded technologies

Semantic-based knowledge systemsSemantic-based knowledge systems

Display technologies Display technologies

Intelligent interfaces and environments Intelligent interfaces and environments

Security-related developments Security-related developments

GRID research GRID research

Opto-electronics and PhotonicsOpto-electronics and Photonics

3 IP38%

3 NoE30%

10 STP32%

56 MEuro

Funding per participating country

0,00%5,00%10,00%15,00%20,00%25,00%30,00%35,00%40,00%

German

y

United

King

dom

Franc

eIta

ly

Switzer

land

Finlan

d

Poland

Nether

lands

Belgium

Spain

Greece

Denmark

Sweden

Austria

Russia

n Fed

erati

on

Turke

y

Hunga

ryIsr

ael

Belaru

s

Portug

al

Irelan

d

Roman

ia

Lithu

ania

Czech

Rep

ublic

Slovakia

Canad

a

Fu

nd

ing

(%

)

Top 20 partners

0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 4,5

CNRS

FhGTHALES

University of Leeds

Philips GmbH Forschungslaboratorien

Schott SpecialglasUniversity of Cambridge

University of Kassel

EPFL

Alcatel-CITTechnische Universitaet Dresden

RWTH

Siemens Aktiengesellschaft

Aixtron AGCEA

Covion Organic Semiconductors

Heriot-Watt University

National Nanotechnology Laboratoy Ist. per la Sintesi Organica e la Fotoreattivita

Deutsche Thomson-Brandt

Funding (%)

13.5%

HE41%

IND27%

OTH1%

RES31%

SME estimate: 13%

The ResearchBricks:

Solid-State

Sources and

Sources arrays

Materials and microstructures

Passive Components Photonic

ICs

Sensors

The Cements:Integration Technologies

Manufacturing Scalability

Education and Training

Minimally-Invasive Diagnostics and

Therapies, biophotonics

Photonic sensors and imagers

GrandChallenges: Low-Cost High-

Bandwidth to all - Terabyte

storage

Environment / Security / Other

Industrialsectors

Health care / Life Science

Telecom / infotainment

CCoverageoverage

H. Rajbenbach OPTIMIST-EPIC-COST, Athens 2004

Active components(Lasers and LED)

Active / passive integration(Photonic Integrated circuits)

Microelec / Photonic integration

Nanophotonics, Photonic crystals

Passive components

Photonics: Technology coverage

IPSTREPNoE

16 selected proposals

Biopho

tonics

/

Med

Teleco

m

Enviro

nmen

t

Secur

ity

Consu

mer

electr

onics

,

Lightin

g

SC/fiber lasers

MEPHISTO

e-PIXnet

PHOREMOST

OL

LA

TE

RA

NO

VA

NEMOB

RIG

HT

.EU

WAPITI MUFINS

FUNFOX

NITWAVE

FAST-ACCESS

URANUS

AT

HO

S +

MIC

RO

HO

LA

S

Storage

THz sourcesOrganic LEDs

PICMOS SynQPSK

Blue lasers

Research:Research:

Terahertz Sensing & Imaging for:Terahertz Sensing & Imaging for:

- Biotechnology (bio molecule and DNA sensing)- Biotechnology (bio molecule and DNA sensing)

- Healthcare (medical imaging)- Healthcare (medical imaging)

- Security (access control, explosives, bio-agents)- Security (access control, explosives, bio-agents)

- Process Monitoring (micro- nanoelectronics)- Process Monitoring (micro- nanoelectronics)

Partnership:Partnership:

Large Industry (Large Industry (BAe Systems, Evotec, Renishaw, Thales)BAe Systems, Evotec, Renishaw, Thales)

SMES (SMES (Alpes Lasers, Femtolasers, TeraView)Alpes Lasers, Femtolasers, TeraView)

Universities (Universities (Aachen, Delft, Durham, Leeds, Neuchatel, FreiburgAachen, Delft, Durham, Leeds, Neuchatel, Freiburg

Paris-VII, Pisa, Wien)Paris-VII, Pisa, Wien)

Contract:Contract:

IP, 4 years, 5 M€ grantIP, 4 years, 5 M€ grant

Example: TERANOVAExample: TERANOVA

H. Rajbenbach

Embedded systemsEmbedded systems

Top 20 partners

0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5

INRIAARC Seibersdorf research

Centre Nat. de la Recherche Scientifique

Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya ERICSSON

Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan

European Space AgencyTTTech Computertechnik

Università di Pisa

Technical University of ViennaTechnische Universiteit Eindhoven

University of Twente

RHEINISCH-WESTF. TECHN. HOCHSCHULEUNIVERSITY OF PATRAS

Swiss Federal Institute of Techn.

Automatic Control Lab, ETH ZurichLund University

Chalmers University of Technology

SIRA LTDTRIALOG

Eur. Aeronautic Defence and Space Company

Funding (%)

Funding per participating country

0,00%

5,00%

10,00%

15,00%

20,00%

25,00%Fu

ndin

g (%

)

HE41%

IND34%

OTH7%

RES18%

58 MEuro

IP Example: DECOS (19 Partners )IP Example: DECOS (19 Partners )

Industrial PartnersIndustrial Partners: :

Audi Electronics Venture, Audi Electronics Venture, Airbus, EADS, Infineon, Airbus, EADS, Infineon, TTTech, Fiat, Profactor, Hella, TTTech, Fiat, Profactor, Hella, Liebherr, Thales, EsterelLiebherr, Thales, Esterel

Research CentersResearch Centers::

ARC Seibersdorf (Co-ordinator), ARC Seibersdorf (Co-ordinator), SP Swedish Test. & Res. Inst.SP Swedish Test. & Res. Inst.

Universities: Universities:

TU Vienna, TU Darmstadt, TU TU Vienna, TU Darmstadt, TU Hamburg, Uni Kassel, Uni Kiel, Hamburg, Uni Kassel, Uni Kiel, Uni BudapestUni Budapest

Duration:Duration: 3 Years, 3 Years,

Budget:Budget: 14.3 Mio € 14.3 Mio €

EU Funding:EU Funding: 9 Mio €9 Mio €

DECOS MotivationDECOS Motivation

Electronic Hardware Cost ReductionElectronic Hardware Cost Reduction (fewer ECU’s, cables, connectors)(fewer ECU’s, cables, connectors)

Enhanced Dependability by Design Enhanced Dependability by Design (clear partitioning of safety-critical (clear partitioning of safety-critical and non safety-critical subsystems and non safety-critical subsystems by design)by design)

Reduced Development Costs Reduced Development Costs (modular certification, reuse of software (modular certification, reuse of software components, structured integration forcomponents, structured integration forcommunication & computational elements)communication & computational elements)

Diagnosis and Maintenance Diagnosis and Maintenance (diagnosis of transient and intermittent component (diagnosis of transient and intermittent component failures)failures)

Intellectual Property (IP) ProtectionIntellectual Property (IP) Protection

Facilitate the systematic design & deployment of “Facilitate the systematic design & deployment of “integratedintegrated” electronic ” electronic subsystems in embedded systems through:subsystems in embedded systems through:

DECOS Application AreasDECOS Application Areas

AutomotiveAutomotive

AerospaceAerospace

RailwaysRailways

Industrial ControlIndustrial Control

Medical SystemsMedical Systems

Autonomous Autonomous SystemsSystems

DECOS will develop structured guidelines for domain-independant DECOS will develop structured guidelines for domain-independant and technology independent integration.and technology independent integration.

New opportunitiNew opportunities:es: F Focus Semantic-based knowledge systemsocus Semantic-based knowledge systems

1CA2%

4IP46%

4NOE33%

1SSA2%

6STREP17%

Top 20 partners

0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4

FRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFTNATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND

BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLCUNIVERSITAET INNSBRUCKUNIVERSITAET KARLSRUHE

INST. NAT. DE RECH. EN INFORM. ET AUTOM.THE UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD

CENTRE FOR RES. AND TECHN. HELLASMOTOROLA LIM ITED

SAP AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT SYSTEMEXEROX - THE DOCUMENT CO.

THE UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOLTELEFONICA

UNIVERSITY OF LONDONPHILIPS ELECTRONICS NEDERLAND

J OZEF STEFAN INSTITUTECONSIGLIO NAZIONALE DELLE RICERCHE

VERENIGING CHR. WETENSCH. ONDERWIJ SEMPOLIS GMBH

THOMSON MULTIMEDIA R & D FRANCE SNC

Funding (%)

HES42%

IND22%

OTH2%

REC20%

SME14%

73 MEuroFunding per participating country

0

24

6

8

1012

14

1618

20

DE UK FR AT ES IT NL IE GR IL CH SI BE SE FI BG NO DK CZ MT P L P T RO HU TR LI CY

Fund

ing

(%)

Leading and challenging applications Leading and challenging applications responding to emerging needsresponding to emerging needs

e-Government e-Government e-Business e-Business ICT for health careICT for health care e-Inclusione-Inclusion e-Safety e-Safety e-Learninge-Learning e-Culture e-Culture

ObjectiveObjective: :

– Exploit new markets that will emerge from the deployment of societal Exploit new markets that will emerge from the deployment of societal applications applications

– Bring technology closer to people’s needs Bring technology closer to people’s needs

EGov/eBusinessEGov/eBusiness

1CA1%

7IP60%

1NOE19%

2SSA1%

11STREP19%

Funding per participating country

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

IT UK DE ES FR NL GR NO BE FI PT IE AT SE PL CH LU DK IL TR SI MX CZ BR HU EE IS CY BG LT SK

Fund

ing

(%)

HES30%

IND27%

OTH8%

REC13%

SME20%

TBD2%

EGov/eBusiness participationEGov/eBusiness participation

Top 20 partners

0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4

SAP AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT SYSTEMEFRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFT

SINTEFCOMPUTAS AS

UNINOVAT.X.T. E-SOLUTIONS

INTERNAT. BUS. MACHINES BELGIUMUNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI ROMA

DEUTSCHES FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM CENTRO RICERCHE FIAT

TECHN. RES. CENTRE OF FINLANDIMP. COLL. OF SCIENCE, TECHN. AND

UNIVERSITE HENRI POINCARE NANCY 1UNIVERSITEIT VAN AMSTERDAM

CONSIGLIO NAZIONALE DELLE RICERCHECOUNCIL CENT. LAB. OF THE RES.

T6 PICCOLA SOCIETA COOP.GRUPPO FORMULA

SUN MICROSYSTEMS IBERICATES

CENTRE DE RECH. PUBLIC HENRI TUDOR

Funding (%)

Top 20 partners

0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5

BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONSVISA INTERNATIONAL

AIRIAL CONSEILTHE UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD

ASS. IMPRESA POLITECNICOFRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFT

GRUPO CORPORATIVO GFI INFORMATICAOXFORD COMPUTER CONSULTANTS

THE UNIVERSITY OF SURREYCETIM

HEWLETT PACKARD ITALIANAIBM GLOBAL SERVICES ESPANA

ECOLE DES HAUTES ETUDES COMM.INDRA SISTEMAS

EPEKTASISSTOWARZYSZENIE "MIASTA W

PLANET ERNST & Y OUNGCSTB

BUSINESS FLOW CONSULTINGERASMUS UNIVERSITEIT ROTTERDAM

INTELLIGENT SOFTWARE COMPONENTS

Funding (%)

eBusiness

eGovernment

Leading applications:Leading applications: Focus eGovernment Focus eGovernment

Maturity

Text-to-Speech and Speech Synthesis

Technology Trigger

Peak of Inflated Expectations

Trough of Disillusionment

Slope of Enlightenment

Plateau of Productivity

Visibility

As of June 2003

WirelessFidelity and

802.11b

Speech Recognition for Telephony and Call Centers

VoIP

PKI

Mobile Payments

Location "Aware" Services and Technology

Peer-to-Peer Technologies

Internal Web Services

External Web Services

Deployments

Open Source Web Infrastructure Servers

Open Source Desktop Applications

Public Sector Vertical Applications

Biometrics

Natural Language Search

Smart Cards

Semantic Web

E-Tags

HOPSSAFIR GUIDE

ONTOGOVQUALEG

COSPA

FLOSSPOLS

eMAYORUSE-ME.GOVINTELCITIES

TERREGOV

42

ICT functionalities to deliver an Integrated Open System City Platform (IOSCP)………..

e-Inclusion

Local eGovernment Interface based on XML, XSL, VRML, eGIF & other standards

Decision and analysis system supported by GIS and other analysis tools such as data

mining, etc.

Integrated multi-dimensional database with intelligent

information management. Includes: spatial data for buildings

and land, economic, social, and environmental data.

e-Mobility System

e-Land Use

System

e-Admin System

-

Integrated Open System City Platform

Wired

System

Wireless System

Project Number 507860

FP6 Integrated ProjectFP6 Integrated Project

eHealtheHealth

5 IP51%

3 NOE19%

1 SSA1%

11 STREP29%

Funding per participating country

0

5

10

15

20

25

IT UK ES GR DE BE FR AT NL CY SE FI IL DK PL HU CZ PT TR IE CH SI NO MT RO

Fu

nd

ing

(%

)

Top 20 partners

0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5

PHILIPSFONDAZIONE S RAFFAELE

ITACAJ OANNEUM RES. FORSCHUNGSGESELL.

UNIVERSIDAD POLITECNICA DE MADRIDATOS ORIGIN

UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI PISAAIRIAL CONSEIL

UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINAPHILIPS INTERNATIONAL

PHILIPS ELECTRONICS UK KARL-FRANZENS-UNIVERSITAET GRAZ

GUY ' S AND ST. THOMAS' HOSPITALHITECH SNT

THE UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOLEMPHASIS SYSTEMS AE

BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM ITALIA.MEDTRONIC IBERICA SA

KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVENFUNDACION VODAFONE

ASSOCIAZIONE IMPRESA POLITECNICO

Funding (%)

HES28%

IND28%

OTH11%

REC9%

SME24%

TBD0%

FETFET

HES74%

IND0%

OTH4%

REC22%

SME0%

Top 20 partners

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

IMP. COLLEGE OF SCIENCE, TECHN. AND MED.

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND

ALBERT-LUDWIGS-UNIVERSITAET FREIBURG

TECHN. RES. CENTRE OF FINLAND

UNIVERSITAET AUGSBURG

TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITAET WIEN

J OHANNES GUTENBERG-UNIVERSITAET

VER. VOOR CHRIS. WETENSCHAP. ONDERWIJ S

UNIVERSITAT J AUM E I DE CASTELLON

COMM ISSARIAT A L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUE

UNIVERSITE MONTPELLIER II

STICHTING KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT

INST. NAT. DE RECH. EN INFORM . ET EN AUTOM.

UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI

UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI FIRENZE

BIBLIOTECA J OSEP LAPORTE

STICHT. CENTR. BEG.ORG. INTERCOL. TOETSING

Funding (%)

HES68%

IND

9%

OTH

0%

REC17%

SME

4%

TBD

2%

Top 20 partners

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

RUHR-UNIVERSITAET BOCHUMAARHUS UNIVERSITET

UNIVERSITAET KARLSRUHECENTRE NAT. RECH. SCIENTIFIQUE

SC. SUP. DI STUDI UNIV. E DI PERFEZION.SANT'ANNAKUNGLIGA TEKNISKA HOEGSKOLAN

FRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFTCONSIGLIO NAZIONALE DELLE RICERCHE

KOEBENHAVNS UNIVERSITETSONY France

Future Partner(s)COLLEGIUM BUDAPEST

TELECOM ITALIA LEARNING SERVICES UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI ROM A

UNIVERSITAET PADERBORNSIEM ENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

SICSUPPSALA UNIVERSITET

NAT. TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENSUNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI SIENAUNIVERSITEIT VAN AMSTERDAM

Funding (%)

Open

Proactive

Conclusion: SWOT analysis (I)Conclusion: SWOT analysis (I)

StrengthsStrengths– FP6 orientations have been well received FP6 orientations have been well received – Focus on Europe’s major strengths continues Focus on Europe’s major strengths continues – FET remains an incubator FET remains an incubator – From short-term to long term and from generic to applied From short-term to long term and from generic to applied

research. research.

WeaknessesWeaknesses– High oversubscription in some fieldsHigh oversubscription in some fields– SME participation SME participation – Participation of New Member StatesParticipation of New Member States– Participation of third countries Participation of third countries

Conclusion: SWOT analysis (II)Conclusion: SWOT analysis (II)

OpportunitiesOpportunities

– Multi-disciplinarity Multi-disciplinarity – New Member States New Member States – Embedding of ICT in applicationsEmbedding of ICT in applications– Impact on EU-wide policiesImpact on EU-wide policies– Key technologies will help solve trust and security challengesKey technologies will help solve trust and security challenges– FET as a pathfinder FET as a pathfinder

ThreatsThreats

– New instruments need new and adequate ways of management and New instruments need new and adequate ways of management and monitoringmonitoring

– Involvement of SMEsInvolvement of SMEs– IPR issues in large consortia IPR issues in large consortia – Concentration on short term issuesConcentration on short term issues– Role and performance of NoEs in some areas.Role and performance of NoEs in some areas.– Fragmented value chains, still more integration..Fragmented value chains, still more integration..– Different innovation cyclesDifferent innovation cycles

Next stepsNext steps

Statistics: need to be refined Statistics: need to be refined

Content: analysis needs to be deepened: More Content: analysis needs to be deepened: More semanticssemantics

IPPA as an integral part of wider Impact AnalysisIPPA as an integral part of wider Impact Analysis