introduction to subsurface exploration - chihping lin...

47
Introduction to Subsurface Exploration Introduction to Subsurface Exploration Objectives Planning Test Pits Soil Borings Soil/Rock Sampling In Situ Tests

Upload: dinhduong

Post on 07-Apr-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Introduction to Subsurface Exploration

    Introduction to Subsurface Exploration

    ObjectivesPlanningTest PitsSoil BoringsSoil/Rock SamplingIn Situ Tests

  • Site CharacterizationDefine objectives of explorationBackground studyDesign subsurface exploration program

    Boring # and depthSampling # and depthIn-situ testing methods and #

    Characterize Soil and RockDevelop idealized soil profilePerform monitoring instrumentation

    Objectives

  • Objectives

    Get Stratigraphy and G.W.TDetermine engineering properties

    In Situ TestsDisturbed samples, index testsUndisturbed samples, Lab tests

    Background study

  • Background study

    Planning

    Boring # and DepthRelated to (a) knowledge of site conditions, (b) Type of foundationIn general, clay deposit produce more well defined strata and sand can be more locally variableAllow for cross sections

  • Planning (contd)# of borings

    Rule of thumb: 1 boring per 2500 ft2 of building area

    Approximate spacing of boreholes

    Planning (contd)Depth of borings

    Depth > 2B (Strength concern)Depth D1 at (v / q) < 0.1 Depth D2 at (v / v0) < 0.05 Minimum Depth = min(D1, D2)In deep excavations, depth > 1.5 depth of excavation

  • 65600m25000m21.523m1.5~2

  • Test PitsExamine soil strataGround Water TableSeepage ConditionRetrieve disturbed and undisturbed samplesPerform density and strength tests in situIdentify organic soil, bedrock ripability, potential borrow soils, etc.

  • -

  • Test Pits

    Examine fault zone for evidence of recent movement.Identify slickensides evidence of slope movementLimitations:

    Depth limit (10~20)Stability of WallsG. W. T.

  • Soil Borings

    Hand Augur, Power AugurContinuous Flight AugurHollow Stem AugurRotary Drilling (Rotary Wash)Percussion DrillingWireline System

    Hand Augur, Power Augur

    Remove disturbed samplesDetermine soil profileLocate G.W.T.Limitations:

    Above G.W.T. in granular soilsBelow G.W.T. must be med-stiff clayDifficult to penetrate dens sand and stiff-hard clay. Practical limit ~ 10

  • http://www.mastrad.com/mackit.htm

    Hand Augur and Core Sampler

    http://ewr.cee.vt.edu/environmental/teach/smprimer/core/coresmp.mov?

  • Continuous Flight Augur

    Rapid drilling and disturbed samplesIn soils with some cohesionHole will collapse in granular and soft soils

  • Hollow Stem Augur

    Hollow stem serve as a casing to keephole openCan get SPT test resultsCannot penetrate very strong soil orrock.Problem when sampling below G.W.T.

    Rotary Drilling (Rotary Wash)

    Can obtain all types of samples in soil & rock, undisturbed, disturbed, cores.Require relatively large expensive equipment.Require pumps for circulating fluid (mud)Holes requires stabilization

  • Rotary DrillingExcept circular water, there are two ways to keep

    stabilizationCasing

    Used in sands and gravels, and soft clay, esp. below G.W.T.Installation very slow, and removed can be very time consuming.

    Mud SlurrySlurry may be from natural soils or slurry by adding BentoniteCant determine G.W.T.

  • Percussion drilling

    FastNo samplesGravel

    Wireline System

  • Soil/Rock Sampling

    Disturbed samplesSplit spoon samplerStandard penetration testSoil sampler (sand, silt, peat)

    Undisturbed SamplesShelby tube (Thin wall tube)Piston sampler

    Rock Cores

    Split Spoon Sampler

    Standard Penetration TestSplit-Spoon Sampler

    ~ 2 in length2 O.D.1.5 I.D. w/o liner1.375 I.D. w/ linerArea ratio = (Do2-Di2)/Di2 ~ 110%.

    140#, 30, (6, 6, 6)Typically 4 in top 10, then every 5

    Area ratio < 10%considered undisturbed

  • Soil sampler

    Undistrubed SamplerShelby Tube

    2.5 and 3 are most commonArea ratio ~ 10%For sand, put a spring core catcher at the end of shelby tube

    Piston SamplerThin wall tube with a piston, 50 mm~120 mmFor sensitive soils, this is betterThe presence of the piston prevent distortion by not admitting excess soilUse piston tube to achieve vacuum in sampler for extraction of sample

  • Shelby Tube

    PistonSampler

  • Sample disturbance

    Undisturbed sampling of sands

    FreezingPiston with circulation tubes with nitrogen gas.

    ImpregnationA substance that would harden (gel) with little

    to no expansion.

  • Coring of rock

    Core barrel + Coring bitSingle tubeDouble tube

    Recovery Ratio(length of core recovered/theoretical length of

    rock cored)Rock Quality Designation (RQD)Sum(length of recovered pieces >=

    4)/(theoretical length of rock cored)

    Rock drilling

  • In-Situ Geotechnical Tests for Soils

  • SPT

    Representative SPT Profile

    Downtown Memphis

    0

    4

    8

    12

    16

    20

    24

    28

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    SPT-N (bpf)

    Dep

    th (m

    eter

    s)

    1982 B11982-B3

    1982-B5

    Soil Profile

    Silty Sand

    Sandy Silt

    Gravelly Sand

    Desiccated OC Clay

    Clayey Sand

    OC Clay

    Fill

    Gravelly Sand

  • SPTMethodStandardizationN values are very dependent on

    Equipment used (Em)Size of hole (Cb)Type of spoon lined or unlined (Cs)Length of rods (Cr)OperatorTo standardized find N60 60% of theoretical energy

    N60=Em Cb Cs Cr N/0.6

    SPT

    Correction for overburden stressto standard of 1 tsf (~100 kPa)Nc = Cn NCn=0.77 log10(20 Pa/v)=f(v)(N60)1 = Cn N60, which is used in estimating many engineering parameters, particular for seismic design work.

  • SPT

    Correction for ground watere.g. above G.W.T., N=30 for medium-dense silty fine sand, below G.W.T. N=45 because the soil is dilative and SPT cause negative u.Terzaghi recommended

    (N60)1 =15+((N60)1 15)/2, for (N60)1 >15 and silty sands or find sands below G.W.T.

    SPT Applications

    Development of engineering propertiesGranular soil: Dr, , E, LiquefactionCohesive Soil: not much

    Site specific correlations w/ lab test results is about all that can be done, although Cu and OCR have been related to SPT results.

    Settlement and bearing capacity of granular soils

  • SPT

    AdvantageInexpensiveAvailabilitySample obtainedHuge databaseAble to penetrate local hazard

    Disadvantage Operate dependent Accuracy is poor Not good for gravel No continuous profile No good correlation for

    clay

    N

    DR = relative densityT = unit weightLI = liquefaction index' = friction anglec' = cohesion intercepteo = void ratioqa = bearing capacityp' = preconsolidationVs = shear waveE' = Young's modulus = dilatancy angleqb = pile end bearingfs = pile skin friction

    SAND

    cu = undrained strengthT = unit weightIR = rigidity index' = friction angleOCR = overconsolidationK0 = lateral stress stateeo = void ratioVs = shear waveE' = Young's modulusCc = compression indexqb = pile end bearingfs = pile skin frictionk = permeabilityqa = bearing stress CLAY

    Is One Number Enough???

  • Cone Penetrometers

    Electronic Steel Probes with 60 Apex TipASTM D 5778 ProceduresHydraulic Push at 20 mm/sNo Boring, No Samples, No Cuttings, No SpoilContinuous readings of stress, friction, pressure

    CPT

  • Cone Penetration Tests (CPT)

    Mobile 25-tonne rigs withenclosed cabins to allowtesting under all weather conditions

    Cone Trucks

    CPT Profile

    0

    4

    8

    12

    16

    20

    24

    28

    0 20 40 60

    qt (MPa)

    Dep

    th (m

    eter

    s)

    0

    4

    8

    12

    16

    20

    24

    28

    0 500 1000

    fs (kPa) u b (kPa)

    0

    4

    8

    12

    16

    20

    24

    28

    -200 0 200 400 600 800

    qt

    ub

    fs

  • Comparison CPT and SPTDowntown Memphis

    0

    4

    8

    12

    16

    20

    24

    28

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    SPT-N (bpf) and qc (MPa)

    Dep

    th (m

    eter

    s)1982 B11982-B31982-B5CPT-qc (MPa)

    Soil Profile

    Silty Sand

    Sandy Silt

    Gravelly Sand

    Desiccated OC Clay

    Clayey Sand

    OC Clay

    Fill

    Gravelly Sand

    CPT

    MethodMechanical Dutch coneElectric cone

    MeasurementsTip resistanceSleeve frictionWater pressureOthers

  • CPT

    ApplicationsSoil identificationGranular soil: Dr, , E, LiquefactionCohesive soil: Su, OCR

    Robertson and Campanellas correlation (1983)between qc, Fr, and soil type

    SPT-N vs. CPT-qc

  • qc-0-DrFor NC quartz sand qc-0-

    For NC quartz sand

    CPT

    AdvantageContinuous profileAccuratePore water pressureInexpensiveFast

    Disadvantage Doesn't work in

    gravel No sample Limited penetration

    depth

  • 60o

    fs

    qc

    Vs

    u1

    u2

    Cone Tip Stress, qtPenetration Porewater Pressure, uSleeve Friction, fsArrival Time of Downhole Shear

    Wave, ts

    Obtains Four Independent Measurements with Depth:

    Seismic Piezocone Test

    Downhole Shear Wave Velocity

    Anchoring SystemAutomated SourcePolarized WaveDownhole Vs

  • Vane Shear Test

    Vane Shear Test

  • Vane Shear Test

    Vane Shear Test

    Used primarily to access the undrainedstrength of soft clay.Method

    Borehole, pipe, Push and rotateRelate peak strength to undrained strength, SuRotate continued for 10~25 revolution to remold soil and then the residual strength is measured

  • Vane Shear Test

    Assumptions in evaluationUndrainedIsotropicNo disturbance due to insertionNo progressive failure (perfect plasticity)

    Su = k Tk: correction factor

    Vane Shear Test

    AdvantageFast and economicalReproducible in homogeneous depositsSignificant data baseVery good for estimating sensitvity

    DisadvangeSu is the only application

  • Pressuremeter Test (PMT)

    MethodPre-bore PMTSelf-boring PMT

    MeasurementPressure-deformationrelationship

    Pressuremeter Test (PMT)

  • Pressuremeter Test (PMT)

    Pressuremeter Test (PMT)

  • Evaluation of Pressuremeter test

    Pressuremeter Test (PMT)

    ApplicationsEsitmating soil strength parametersA better approach is to use the PMT results directly for foundation design

  • Pressuremeter Test (PMT)Advantage

    Stress-strain response obtainedKo is obtained (SBPMT better in this regard)Excellent tool for pile (esp. lateral load)

    DisadvantageSoil stratigraphy must be known in advanceExcess pore water pressure not knownDependent on borehole disturbanceMore time consuming and expensiveMisleading if soil is highly anisotropic

    Dilatometer Test (DMT)

  • Dilatometer Test (DMT)

    MethodMeasurements

    ThrustA-pressure (0.05 mm)B-pressure ( 1.1 mm)C-pressure (0.05 mm )Corrections for readings

    Dilatometer Test (DMT)

  • Dilatometer Test (DMT)

    ApplicationsSAND: Classification, Stratigraphy, Liquefaction, Dr, State parameter, Clay: Su, Kh, Coeff. Of consol., Stress history, M, E, G

  • Determination ofsoil descriptionand unit weight(Schmertmann,1986)

    Dilatometer Test (DMT)Advantage

    Simple and rapid, rugged, less disturbedGood for horizontal stress, OCRNearly continuous profile

    DisadvantageLimited field exposureAvailability Difficult in hard soilThrust measurement complicates the systemNo sample obtained

  • Plate Load Test (PLT)

    Evaluation of PLT (Sand)

  • Evaluation of PLT (Clay)

    Screw plate test