institute of navigation and satellite geodesy n w …

1
Introduction Roland Pail, Reinhard Mayrhofer INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION AND SATELLITE GEODESY GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Gravity Field Simulator for the Evaluation of Future Gravity Field Mission Concepts S SW W NW SE INAS This case study is based on a 3-days repeat orbit configuration (cf. ). A single orbit (black) has a very low spatial resolution, which is improved by a second orbit interleaved (red). Successively interleaving orbits (green, blue) improve the ground track distribution further. Fig. 2 Along these orbits, gravity signals are computed based on the global gravity model EGM96, complete to degree/order 200, and the gravity field is recovered. shows the (omission) errors in terms of gravity anomalies of the individual orbit configurations. Using 8 satellites in parallel, already after 3 days a gravity field model up to degree 200 can be resolved. Fig. 4 Fig.1: Resolution space of a repeat orbit of days and revolutions (after: Sneeuw, 2007). a b How to get rid of ocean tide aliasing ? Fig. 1 shows the resolution space for an ideal repeat orbit of days and revolutions. The product of space and time resolution is constant, i.e., a higher space resolution automatically means a lower time resolution. Consequently, the single- satellite concept can never perform better than the black hyperbola, and only satellite formations can reach the enhanced resolution space in the lower left of the hyperbola. a b Numerical Case Studies Exemplarily, the simulator shall be applied to demonstrate the benefit of satellite formations. This is done in an extremely simplified environment: the observation type is the gravitational potential, which is measured noise-free along ideal repeat orbits. How to derive a degree/order 200 gravity field model in 3 days ? One of the key problems with GRACE is tidal aliasing. In this simulation, the ocean tide signal related to the constituent M2 is superposed to the (noise-free) static gravity field signal (D/O 50) along a 10 days repeat orbit. shows the deterioration of the static gravity field estimates by this high-frequency temporal variation signal. Fig. 5 (left) Satellite formation: shift in longitude (interleaved orbits) Satellite formation: Time shift (coinciding ground track) Fig.2: Improving spatial resolution by means of interleaved orbits. Fig.3: Improving time resolution by means of coinciding tracks with time shift. t =0 0 t = 6h 12min 1 Start time: 1 satellite 8 satellites 4 satellites 2 satellites Fig.4: Cumulative gravity anomaly errors [mGal] at degree/order 200 for several satellite configurations. The temporal resolution of the configuration is improved by a second satellite, which follows the first satellite on the identical track, but with a time delay of a quarter period of M2 (~6h 12min). demonstrates, that by this increase of the temporal resolution, optimized for the M2 signal, the static gravity field can be perfectly recovered. Fig. 5 (right) mGal mGal mGal Fig.5: Tidal aliasing in the static gravity field solution due to the M2 ocean tide (left); improvement by increasing the time resolution (right), optimized for this specific problem. Shortcomings of currently operated satellite gravity missions and the geophysical signals derived from the resulting gravity field models can be attributed to several issues: the specific characteristics of the measurement signal and its error (covariance) structure, superposition of different geophysical signals, the specific orbit configuration and the related space and time resolution leading to aliasing effects. Many of these limitations can be reduced by satellite formations, i.e., a constellation of several satellites orbiting in parallel. For the design of future gravity field mission concepts, the investigation of the specific characteristics of different formation concepts and their potential to reduce the above- mentioned problems is of great importance. Therefore, a numerical test environment is set up, which allows to investigate the specific characteristics of different formation concepts under simplified, but still realistic conditions. Gravity field signals which can be synthetized include: - static gravity field models - direct and solid Earth tides - ocean tides - non-tidal temporal variation signals (hydrology, ocean, cryosphere, atmosphere). Meas. concepts & Gravity field functionals Gravity Field Signals Simulator Architecture The gravity field simulator generates observation time series for the most commonly used observation concepts and gravity field functionals: - GPS-SST (potential, accelerations, ...); - inter-satellite tracking (ranges, range rates); - gradiometry. The observation time series are defined along arbitrary orbits (realistic orbits, ideal repeat orbits). Optionally, realistic stochastic models and noise time series are applied. Gravity Field Recovery In this closed-loop environment, gravity field models are recovered from the observation time series, applying either a rigorous adjustment, or a block-diagonal approximation (in the case of ideal repeat orbits). Correspondingly, also aliasing problems (related to periodic and non-periodic temporal variation signals) and signal separation problems (contribution by individual geophysical sources) can be investigated.

Upload: others

Post on 16-Mar-2022

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Introduction

Roland Pail, Reinhard Mayrhofer

INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION AND SATELLITE GEODESY

GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

Gravity Field Simulator for the Evaluation

of Future Gravity Field Mission ConceptsS

SW

W

NW

SE

INAS

This case study is based on a 3-days repeat orbit configuration (cf.). A single orbit (black) has a very low spatial resolution,

which is improved by a second orbit interleaved (red).Successively interleaving orbits (green, blue) improve the groundtrack distribution further.

Fig. 2

Along these orbits, gravity signals are computed based on theglobal gravity model EGM96, complete to degree/order 200, andthe gravity field is recovered. shows the (omission) errors interms of gravity anomalies of the individual orbit configurations.Using 8 satellites in parallel, already after 3 days a gravity fieldmodel up to degree 200 can be resolved.

Fig. 4

Fig.1: Resolution space of a repeat orbit of days and

revolutions (after: Sneeuw, 2007).

How to get rid of ocean tide aliasing ?

Fig. 1 shows the resolution space for an ideal repeat orbit of days

and revolutions. The product of space and time resolution isconstant, i.e., a higher space resolution automatically means a lower

time resolution. Consequently, the single-satellite concept can never perform better thanthe black hyperbola, and only satelliteformations can reach the enhanced resolutionspace in the lower left of the hyperbola.

Numerical Case Studies

Exemplarily, the simulator shall be applied to demonstrate thebenefit of satellite formations. This is done in an extremely simplifiedenvironment: the observation type is the gravitational potential,which is measured noise-free along idealrepeat orbits.

How to derive a degree/order 200

gravity field model in 3 days ?

One of the key problems with GRACE is tidal aliasing. In thissimulation, the ocean tide signal related to the constituent M2 issuperposed to the (noise-free) static gravity field signal (D/O 50)along a 10 days repeat orbit. shows the deterioration ofthe static gravity field estimates by this high-frequency temporalvariation signal.

Fig. 5 (left)

Satellite formation:shift in longitude

(interleaved orbits)

Satellite formation:Time shift

(coinciding ground track)

Fig.2:Improving spatial

resolution by meansof interleaved orbits.

Fig.3:Improving time

resolution by meansof coinciding tracks

with time shift.

t = 00

t = 6h 12min1

Start time:

1 satellite

8 satellites4 satellites

2 satellites

Fig.4: Cumulative gravityanomaly errors [mGal]at degree/order 200 forseveral satelliteconfigurations.

The temporal resolution of the configuration is improved by a secondsatellite, which follows the first satellite on the identical track, but witha time delay of a quarter period of M2 (~6h 12min).demonstrates, that by this increase of the temporal resolution,optimized for the M2 signal, the static gravity field can be perfectlyrecovered.

Fig. 5 (right)

mGal

mGal mGal

Fig.5: Tidal aliasing in the static gravity field solution due to the M2 ocean tide (left);improvement by increasing the time resolution (right), optimized for this specific problem.

Shortcomings of currently operated satellite gravity missions and the geophysicalsignals derived from the resulting gravity field models can be attributed to severalissues: the specific characteristics of the measurement signal and its error (covariance)structure, superposition of different geophysical signals, the specific orbit configurationand the related space and time resolution leading to aliasing effects. Many of theselimitations can be reduced by satellite formations, i.e., a constellation of severalsatellites orbiting in parallel.For the design of future gravity field mission concepts, the investigation of the specificcharacteristics of different formation concepts and their potential to reduce the above-mentioned problems is of great importance. Therefore, a numerical test environment isset up, which allows to investigate the specific characteristics of different formationconcepts under simplified, but still realistic conditions.

Gravity field signals which can be synthetizedinclude:

- static gravity field models- direct and solid Earth tides- ocean tides- non-tidal temporal variation signals (hydrology,

ocean, cryosphere, atmosphere).

Meas. concepts & Gravity field functionals

Gravity Field Signals

Simulator Architecture

The gravity field simulator generates observation time series for the most commonlyused observation concepts and gravity field functionals:- GPS-SST (potential, accelerations, ...);- inter-satellite tracking (ranges, range rates);- gradiometry.

The observation time series are defined along arbitrary orbits (realistic orbits, idealrepeat orbits). Optionally, realistic stochastic models and noise time series are applied.

Gravity Field Recovery

In this closed-loop environment, gravity field models are recovered from theobservation time series, applying either a rigorous adjustment, or a block-diagonalapproximation (in the case of ideal repeat orbits).

Correspondingly, also aliasing problems (relatedto periodic and non-periodic temporal variationsignals) and signal separation problems(contribution by individual geophysical sources)can be investigated.